Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2002, p. 6883-6894, Vol. 22, No. 19
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.19.6883-6894.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016
Received 4 April 2002/ Returned for modification 10 May 2002/ Accepted 3 July 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coactivators which have been identified include members of the p160 family (SRC-1/NCoA-1 [27, 42], TIF-2/GRIP-1/NCoA-2 [23, 50, 52] and AIB1/p/CIP/ACTR/RAC3/TRAM-1 [1, 12, 32, 48, 50]), the CBP/p300 family (9, 20, 27), RIP140 (8), NRC/ASC-2/PRIP/RAP250/TRBP (6, 28, 30, 34, 58), PGC-1 (44), ARA70 (56), p/CAF (4, 55), and NRIF3, which exhibits specificity for only the TRs and the RXRs (31). In addition to mediating the effects of nuclear hormone receptors, certain coactivators also appear to enhance the activity of other transcription factors such as NF-
B, c-Fos, and c-Jun (28).
The DRIPs/TRAPs are another class of factors which are recruited to ligand-bound nuclear hormone receptors (e.g., VDR and TR) (15, 45). The DRIPs and TRAPs are multiprotein complexes which appear to be similar, if not identical, and interestingly, are devoid of the p160 type of coactivators. Some of the polypeptides of the DRIP/TRAP complex also appear to be a part of the SMCC, CRSP, and ARC complexes (24, 40, 46). The DRIP/TRAP complexes associate with ligand-bound TR or VDR via an
220-kDa component referred to as PBP/TRAP220/DRIP205 (15, 45, 60), and other components of the complex interact with other transcription factors (24, 36, 40, 45, 46).
The association of coactivators with receptors occurs through receptor-interacting LXXLL modules of the coactivator (13, 22, 34, 37), which bind to a hydrophobic cleft in the ligand-bound receptor formed by several regions of the LBD (13, 14, 41). The p160 family of coactivators, RIP140, and TRAP220/DRIP205 contain multiple LXXLL motifs (22), which is consistent with the idea that a single molecule of the coactivator can bind a nuclear receptor dimer in vivo (13, 37).
We previously reported the cloning and characterization of NRC (nuclear receptor coactivator) (34) (also referred to as ASC-2/PRIP/RAP250/TRBP) from rat and human cells. NRC acts as a potent coactivator for nuclear hormone receptors (34) and other transcription factors, such as c-Fos, c-Jun, and NF-
B (28). The importance of NRC as an essential coregulator is reflected by the finding that NRC null mice are embryonic lethal (M. Mahajan and H. Samuels, unpublished data). NRC is organized into several modular domains which appear to play an important role in its function as a coactivator and coregulator for nuclear hormone receptors. NRC contains one functional LXXLL motif (LXXLL-1) that binds all nuclear receptors with high affinity. This appears to occur through the formation of NRC dimers, thus contributing two LXXLL motifs to bind nuclear receptor dimers (34). A region containing a second LXXLL motif (LXXLL-2) appears to be highly selective for estrogen-bound ERs. NRC harbors a potent N-terminal activation domain (AD1), which is as active as the VP16 activation domain, and a second activation domain (AD2), which overlaps with the receptor-interacting LXXLL-1 region. Receptor binding mediates a conformational change in NRC, resulting in enhanced activity of the coactivator (34). The C-terminal region of NRC appears to function as a modulatory domain which influences the overall activity of NRC. NRC binds CBP/p300 with high affinity in vivo (34) and in vitro (28), suggesting that NRC may be an important functional component of CBP/p300 complexes in the cell.
CBP and p300, which exhibit intrinsic histone acetyltransferase activity, function as transcriptional integrators for multiple factors, including p/CAF (a histone acetyltransferase) (55), NF-
B (43), the STATs (57), nuclear hormone receptors (9, 20, 27), the p160 family (50, 51), E1A (10), p53 (33), and NRC (28, 34). Although NRC appears to associate with CBP in vivo (34), the identity of other factors that are part of this or other NRC complexes that play a role in the action of NRC are unknown. In this study, we report the cloning and characterization of NRC-interacting factor 1 (NIF-1), which associates with and enhances the activity of NRC in vivo. NIF-1 is a novel nuclear protein of the recently proposed BED finger domain family (3) containing six zinc fingers which directly interacts with NRC but not with nuclear hormone receptors. Although NIF-1 does not bind directly to nuclear hormone receptors, it markedly enhances their ligand-dependent transcriptional activity in vivo. In addition, like NRC, NIF-1 also enhances the activities of c-Fos and c-Jun in vivo. Our results indicate that NIF-1 can be considered an example of an emerging new class of coregulators (which we refer to as cotransducers) which act as part of a complex in vivo to modulate coactivator activity.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Yeast two-hybrid screen.
NRC-b (amino acids 849 to 2,063) (see Fig. 6A) was cloned into pEG202
PL, a modified yeast LexA expression vector, and used as bait in a two-hybrid screen. pEG202
PL was derived from the parent vector pEG202, as described earlier (34). All methods and transformation procedures have been described previously (34). The yeast strain EGY48 harboring the LacZ reporter pSH18-34 (17) and pEG202
PL-NRC-b was transformed with the GH4C1 pJG4-5 cDNA library. Transformants were directly screened on 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) synthetic defined minimal medium (SD)-galactose-raffinose plates lacking Trp, Ura, His, and Leu. Putative positive clones were further purified on Trp-, Ura-, His-, and Leu- SD-galactose-raffinose plates. The purified clones were plated on SD-dextrose Trp-, Ura-, and His- plates to repress the expression of cDNAs from pJG4-5. Galactose-inducible interactions were verified upon replica plating each clone on Trp-, Ura-, His-, and Leu- X-Gal SD-galactose-raffinose and Trp-, Ura-, and His- X-Gal SD-dextrose plates. Yeast clones exhibiting a positive LacZ response on galactose-raffinose plates, but not on dextrose plates, were considered to be potential NRC-interacting clones. The putative cDNAs from positive clones were further verified against several different baits. The positive interactors were then sequenced and subjected to restriction digestion, size determination, and further analysis.
|
[mER
]) was kindly provided by Malcom Parker (35). All plasmids described below were generated by either PCR or restriction enzyme digestion and verified by sequencing and expression studies. Human pEX-NRC and various NRC fragments in pJG4-5
PL (B42 fusions) and pEG202
PL (LexA fusions), such as human NRC-c (amino acids 1,429 to 2,063), rat NRC.1, wild-type (WT) and mutant (MT) and human NRC (amino acids 849 to 1,153), which is analogous to the residues found in rat NRC.1, have been previously described (34). B42 and LexA fusions of rat NRC.1a (amino acids 849 to 995, WT and MT) and NRC.1b (amino acids 995 to 1,153) were amplified by PCR with specific primers and cloned into both pEG202
PL and/or pJG4-5
PL yeast vectors, sequenced, and examined for protein expression. Rat NRC.1a was cloned as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion in pGEX4T (GST-NRC.1a). LexA-human VDR (hVDR)-LBD was generously provided by David Moore, Baylor College of Medicine. hER
LBD in pJG4-5 was from Michael Garabedian, Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine. LexA-hER
LBD was produced by releasing the LBD from pJG4-5 and cloning it into pEG202
PL.
Cloning of human NIF-1 and NIF-1 expression plasmids.
Human NIF-1 was cloned by screening a lambda gt10 phage library derived from a human cell line, NTera-2D1 (kindly provided by Naoko Tanese and Angus Wilson, Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine). One of the positive phage clones (6B) containing a 4.5-kb cDNA insert was identified as a nearly full-length NIF-1 lacking 110 bp from the 5' end. The 3' end of the 6B phage includes a stop codon, about 315 bp of the 3' untranslated region sequence, and a short poly(A) tail. Full-length NIF-1 was generated by ligating a 226-bp HindIII-XhoI PCR product of an expressed sequence tag (EST) (BE297231) (see below) containing a consensus Kozak homology at the 5' end with an XhoI-EcoRI fragment of human NIF-1 (
4.5 kb) released from the 6B clone. The full-length NIF-1 cDNA was cloned into the pEX (34) and pcDNA3 vectors (Invitrogen) and contains coding sequences of 4,029 bp, with HindIII at the 5' end and EcoRI at the 3' end. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-NIF-1 was generated by releasing full-length NIF-1 cDNA from pEX-NIF-1 with HindIII-EcoRI and cloning it into pEGFP(C3) (Clontech). Human NIF-1 (6B) was also cloned into the EcoRI site of pJG4-5
PL. One of the EST clones (BE297231) (IMAGE Consortium) was sequenced completely, identified as an isoform of human NIF-1, and designated NIF-2. The NIF-2 cDNA lacking the first 222 nucleotides (N-terminal 74 amino acids) was released from pOTB7 with XhoI, end-filled, and cloned into the pJG4-5
PL and pEG202
PL yeast vectors at NcoI-filled ends. The following plasmids were cloned into the pJG4-5
PL and/or pEG202
PL yeast vectors (see Fig. 5). (i) Human NIF-1(f), the C-terminal region of human NIF-1 (representing amino acids 1043 to 1342), containing zinc finger 6, the leucine zipper-like motif, and the remainder of the C terminus was cloned into NcoI-filled XhoI sites. (ii) Human NIF-1(e), an SmaI-XhoI NIF-1 fragment representing amino acids 1138 to 1342, was ligated with NcoI-filled XhoI-cut vectors. This clone contains the leucine zipper-like motif and the remaining C terminus of NIF-1. (iii) Human NIF-1(b), a NotI-EcoRI-end-filled fragment representing amino acids 42 to 644 of the N-terminal region of NIF-1, was cloned into BamHI-end-filled yeast vectors. (iv) Human NIF-1(g), representing amino acids 1007 to 1150 and harboring zinc fingers 5 and 6, was generated by PCR with specific primers and cloned as an XhoI-EcoRI fragment.
|
MTV-IR-CAT (16), were used at concentrations of 50 to 100 ng/sample, and other plasmids, pEX-NRC and pEX-NIF-1, were used at concentrations of 0.7 to 1.2 µg/sample. GFP-NIF-1 was transfected into Cos1 cells by using calcium-phosphate coprecipitation, and the cell distribution of GFP-NIF-1 was analyzed by fluorescent microscopy and Hoechst dye staining of the nucleus 48 h later. Yeast and ß-galactosidase assays. All ß-galactosidase assays were performed at least twice in duplicate or triplicate. Various ligands, such as T3 for the TRs, 9-cis RA for RXR and RAR, and estradiol (E2), were used at concentrations of 1 µM while deoxycorticosterone for GR was used at a concentration of 10 µM. Yeast colonies were first grown exponentially in Ura-, His-, and Trp- SD-dextrose medium, washed, diluted to the appropriate density, and incubated in Ura-, His-, and Trp- SD-galactose-raffinose medium followed by quantitation of ß-galactosidase as described earlier (31, 34). ß-galactosidase units are expressed as (OD420 x 1,000)/(minutes of incubation x OD600 of the yeast suspension), where OD420 and OD600 are optical density at 420 and 600 nm, respectively.
In vivo association of NIF-1 with NRC. The mammalian GST expression vectors pEBG (expressing GST) and pEBG-NRC (expressing a GST fusion of full-length NRC) have been described earlier (34). pEX-FlagNIF-1 was cotransfected with pEBG or pEBG-NRC in 293T cells, and whole-cell extracts were prepared 36 h later, as described previously (34). Proteins remaining bound to the expressed GST proteins were purified with glutathione-agarose beads and processed for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-gel electrophoresis followed by Western blotting as described earlier (34). The Western blot was probed with M2 anti-Flag antibody to detect Flag-NIF-1.
In vitro binding of NIF-1 to GST-NRC. GST-NRC.1a was expressed in SG1117 Escherichia coli by induction with isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and then purified and immobilized to glutathione-agarose, as described previously (18, 19). NIF-1 was labeled by in vitro transcription-translation with [35S]L-methionine with rabbit reticulocyte lysates. Typically, 200 to 400 ng of GST protein bound to glutathione-agarose was used per assay. 35S-labeled proteins were mixed with GST or GST-NRC.1a beads. The samples were incubated at 4°C for 30 min in binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.7 at 25°C], 2 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.01% bovine serum albumin, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.25% NP-40, and 0.25 µM zinc acetate). The samples were then washed with the same incubation buffer, and the bound 35S-labeled protein was analyzed by SDS-gel electrophoresis followed by autoradiography.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The nucleotide sequences of NIF-1 and NIF-2 have been deposited in GenBank and assigned the following accession numbers: NIF-1/NIF-2, accession number AF395833; rat NIF, accession numbers AF309071 and AY079168.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B, c-Fos, and c-Jun (28, 34). Since the mechanism of transcriptional enhancement by NRC is not clearly understood, we sought to identify factors which may play a role in mediating these effects of NRC. In this study, we used a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify factors that functionally interact with NRC. A yeast LexA vector which expresses a fusion of the LexA DBD with NRC (amino acids 849 to 2063) was used as bait to screen the pJG4-5 GH4C1 cDNA library, which was used previously to identify NRC (34). pJG4-5 conditionally expresses cDNAs as B42 activation domain fusions. This screen identified a cDNA interactor (1.8 kb), which was found to be an ortholog of a putative transcript from a gene of unknown function identified in the human genome located on chromosome 20. The assembled transcript from this human genome sequence is predicted to encode a protein of 1,342 amino acids. We refer to this clone as NIF-1. Reverse transcription-PCR with mRNA from human T-47D and MCF-7 breast cancer cells, with primers from the predicted human sequence, identified an mRNA of the same size as that assembled from the NIF-1 genomic sequence. In addition, reverse transcription-PCR with GH4C1 mRNA, with primers from the predicted human cDNA sequence, indicated that an mRNA of similar size to the assembled NIF-1 sequence is expressed in GH4C1 cells.
Cloning, sequence, and predicted domain structure of NIF-1.
A human teratocarcinoma
gt10 cDNA library was screened with a 32P-NIF-1 cDNA probe generated from MCF-7 cells by PCR. Seven independent NIF-1 cDNA clones were identified. Upon comparison with the predicted transcript from the human genomic NIF-1 sequence, the longest clone isolated from the phage library was missing 110 nucleotides of coding sequence from the 5' end, whereas the 3' end extended beyond the stop codon and contains a poly(A) tail and a 3' untranslated region sequence. A database search identified a number of ESTs, seven of which were sequenced completely. One of the ESTs (BE297231) was found to be a full-length alternatively spliced form of NIF-1 which we refer to as NIF-2. The 5' end of this EST contained an authentic ATG and an in-frame stop codon upstream of the ATG, which is consistent with the predicted NIF-1 mRNA sequence. A PCR product containing the 110 nucleotides missing in NIF-1(6B) was generated from the EST DNA and ligated to NIF-1(6B) to generate a full-length NIF-1 clone. In addition to the human and rat NIFs, a GenBank search identified a NIF-related partial chicken cDNA clone (cFZF) (GenBank accession no. U27196) of unknown function.
Figure 1A compares the domain structure of the predicted amino acid sequence of NIF-1 with those of NIF-2 and the partial rat NIF cloned from GH4C1 cells with the yeast-two hybrid screen. NIF-1 contains 1,342 amino acids consisting of six predicted Cys-2/His-2-type zinc fingers, an LXXLL motif, a putative leucine zipper region near its C terminus, and a region of
35 amino acids rich in acidic amino acids towards the N terminus. Motif searches also indicate several putative protein kinase A and tyrosine kinase phosphorylation sites. In addition, a motif search identified that the region containing the first three Cys-2/His-2 zinc fingers of NIF-1 as a component of the recently described BED finger DNA-binding domain found in a number of transcriptional activators and repressors in Drosophila melanogaster (3, 21). Although the function of these BED finger domains is not understood, it has been suggested that these proteins may alter local chromatin architecture through association with insulator sequences in the DNA (3).
|
Cell and tissue distribution of NIF-1.
To study the subcellular localization of NIF-1, Cos1 cells were transfected with a pEGFP-NIF-1 expression vector and the cellular distribution of the GFP-NIF-1 was determined by fluorescent microscopy. As shown in Fig. 2, GFP-NIF-1 localizes exclusively to the cell nucleus, consistent with its possible function as a transcriptional regulator. A full-length 32P-labeled NIF-1 cDNA probe, predicted to identify both NIF-1 and NIF-2 mRNAs, was used to study the tissue distribution of human NIFs (Fig. 3). A multitissue Northern blot (Stratagene) was probed, and it detected a NIF-1 mRNA of
5 kb with relatively higher expression in the skeletal muscle, thymus, placenta, and blood. The colon, spleen, kidney, and lung showed moderate expression of NIF-1 mRNA, and the small intestine, heart, liver, and brain showed lower levels of expression of NIF-1 mRNA. Overexposure of the same blot detected an mRNA species of
2.5 kb, consistent with the size of NIF-2. This transcript was detected in the heart and skeletal muscle and to a lesser extent in the thymus, spleen, kidney, liver, placenta, and blood (not illustrated). NIF-2 was not detected in the small intestine and colon. The results of the Northern blot suggest that the NIF-1 mRNAs are of low abundance but are widely expressed.
|
|
|
Identification of the NIF-ID of NRC. A yeast two-hybrid assay was also used to identify the region of NRC which interacts with NIF-1 (Fig. 6A). Various regions of NRC were expressed as LexA fusions in yeast, and their interactions were compared with those of full-length NIF-1, NIF-2, and various deletions of NIF-1 conditionally expressed from pJG4-5. The NIF-1 interaction domain (NIF-ID) of NRC was localized to amino acids 849 to 995 of human NRC, which also contains the LXXLL-1 receptor interaction motif. To study the possible involvement or requirement of the NRC LXXLL-1 motif for direct interaction with NIF-1, we carried out yeast two-hybrid assays with LexA-NRC constructs containing either the WT (LVNLL) or MT (AVNAA) LXXLL-1 motif. The results indicate that LXXLL-1 is not required for the interaction of NRC with NIFs since the LXXLL-1 mutant forms of NRC interacted with NIF-1 as efficiently as the wild-type NRC forms.
The yeast two-hybrid data suggested that residues 849 to 995 of human NRC and the corresponding region of rat NRC are involved in the interaction with NIF-1. To document that this region of NRC binds to NIF-1 in vitro, we expressed this region of rat NRC as a GST fusion in E. coli and purified it with glutathione-agarose beads. 35S-labeled NIF-1, synthesized by in vitro transcription-translation in reticulocyte lysates, was incubated with
200 ng of purified GST or GST-NRC.1a at 4°C for 30 min in binding buffer with mild shaking. The GST-glutathione-agarose beads were washed, and the bound 35S-labeled proteins were analyzed by SDS-gel electrophoresis followed by autoradiography. As shown in Fig. 6B, 35S-labeled NIF-1 bound to GST-NRC.1a but not to GST, indicating that NIF-1 binds to the same region of NRC in vitro as determined in the yeast two-hybrid assay for which results are shown in Fig. 6A.
NIF-1 does not interact with nuclear hormone receptors but potentiates their ligand-dependent transcriptional activity.
Since NIF-1 interacts with NRC, and NRC has been shown to be a potent coregulator of ligand-bound nuclear hormone receptors, we sought to determine whether NIF-1 could modulate nuclear receptor activity. As shown in Fig. 1, NIF-1 contains an LXXLL motif and might thus interact with nuclear hormone receptors directly, even though it was cloned by using NRC as bait. To examine for this possibility, we studied the interaction of full-length B42-NIF-1, conditionally expressed from pJG4-5, with LexA fusions of nuclear receptor LBDs (chicken TR
[cTR
], ER
, RXR
, GR, RAR
, and PPAR
) in yeast (Fig. 7). In addition, a LexA fusion of full-length cTR
was also tested against full-length B42-NIF-1 and gave results similar to those obtained with the cTR
LBD. NIF-1 did not interact with any of these receptors with or without a cognate ligand, but it interacted strongly with LexA-NRC. To document that the LexA LBD fusions were expressed and responded to ligand in yeast (as reported previously), similar studies were carried out with B42-NRC. As expected, B42-NRC interacted with the LexA-cTR
LBD in a T3-dependent manner (Fig. 7). As previously described (34), all other nuclear hormone receptors showed similar binding with B42-NRC in the presence of their cognate ligands (data not shown)
|
|
, hRAR
, or hGR alone or with NIF-1. Ligand-dependent activation was studied by using T3 for TR, the RAR-selective ligand TTNPB for RAR, and Dex for GR. In each case, the expression of NIF-1 enhanced the extent of ligand-dependent activation by these receptors about threefold.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A central question is how coactivator binding to a ligand-bound receptor leads to transcriptional activation. The finding that p160 coactivators can associate with CBP/p300 suggests that transcriptional enhancement of nuclear receptors by coactivators involves the recruitment of large coactivator-associated complexes to the promoter-bound ligand-bound receptor. In addition, coactivators may exist in dynamic association with different complexes, thereby leading to marked diversity in the extent of activation which may be dependent on cell type, the transcription factor, and possibly the promoter context. Thus, different DRIP/TRAP complexes have been reported to contain both common and unique components, which are thought to be involved in the modulation of different transcription factors. For example, DRIP/TRAP, ARC, CRSP, SRB-mouse mediator, and SMCC are related but distinct multiprotein complexes involved in activation of the nuclear hormone receptors SREBP-1a/Sp1, NF-
B (p65), Sp1, E1A/VP16, and p53 (5, 24, 40, 45). It is remarkable that most of the complexes share common polypeptides despite the fact that the transcription factors modulated by these protein complexes are structurally and functionally distinct. Interestingly, the NAT complex (47), which represses activated transcription, shares components with other complexes involved in the activation described above. Thus, it is becoming increasingly clear that these transcriptionally active complexes contain unique components and also share a number of common factors.
We recently described the cloning of a novel coactivator, which we refer to as NRC, which is part of a CBP complex in vivo that does not appear to include SRC-1. In addition, TRBP (NRC) has also been reported to associate with DRIP130, a common component of some activator complexes, including the DRIP/TRAP complex. Thus, as with other coactivators, NRC may exist as a component of distinct multiprotein complexes which may each mediate specific effects with a subset of transcriptional regulators. In this study, we described the cloning and characterization of a novel factor from rat and human cells which interacts in vitro and in vivo with NRC and modulates the function of NRC in cells. Based on its ability to interact with NRC, we refer to this factor as NIF.
Human NIF-1 is a 1,342-amino-acid nuclear protein containing six Cys-2/His-2 zinc finger domains, an N-terminal acidic sequence of
35 residues rich in Glu and Asp, and an LXXLL motif and a putative leucine zipper-like motif in the C-terminal region. NIF-1 contains several putative protein kinase A and tyrosine kinase phosphorylation sites. In addition, the first three Cys-2/His-2 zinc fingers appear to be part of the recently proposed BED finger DNA-binding domain (3). This domain is found in proteins thought to be involved in activation or repression through association with insulator sequences in the DNA (21) and may thus act to modulate local chromatin structure. Human NIF-1 and the partial rat NIF clone identified in the yeast two-hybrid screen share 86% homology at the amino acid level. In particular, the zinc finger domains, LXXLL region, and the leucine zipper-like motif are highly conserved. A GenBank search identified a NIF-related partial chicken cDNA clone (cFZF) of unknown function. cFZF shares 62% homology with the corresponding region of human NIF-1 with divergence at zinc finger 5 and the leucine zipper-like regions. Interestingly, the LXXLL region is highly conserved in all three proteins. Although this LXXLL motif does not mediate interaction with NRC or the ligand-bound nuclear hormone receptors that we examined, its conservation implies that it may serve an important function in mediating other protein-protein interactions.
An EST database search identified a number of human NIF ESTs. DNA sequencing indicated that one of the ESTs (BE297231) (
2.2 kb) contained 5' and 3' coding sequences identical to those found in NIF-1. This cDNA appears to reflect an alternatively spliced form of NIF-1, which we refer to as NIF-2. NIF-2 lacks 559 residues between amino acids 184 and 743, containing zinc fingers 1 to 4. However, NIF-2 retains the NRC-ID, which includes zinc finger 6. In keeping with this, NIF-2 interacts with NRC in yeast two-hybrid assays. However, the role of NIF-2 with respect to NRC and its other functions remains to be elucidated. A multitissue Northern blot probed with full-length 32P-NIF-1 cDNA identified a widely expressed
5-kb transcript of low abundance and a less abundant
2.5-kb transcript which appears to be more restricted in its tissue expression. We assume that the
5-kb transcript is NIF-1 and the
2.5-kb transcript is NIF-2.
Full-length human NIF-1 binds NRC in vivo and in vitro, and extensive mapping with yeast two-hybrid assays indicates that the NRC-ID of NIF-1 occurs through a region containing zinc finger 6. Interestingly, a short region of 97 amino acids containing zinc finger 6, which is conserved in the rat and human NIFs and in chicken cFZF, appears to be sufficient for a strong interaction with NRC in yeast. A very weak interacting region containing zinc finger 1 was also detected (data not shown). Interestingly, zinc finger 1 shares a weak similarity with zinc finger 6. We also mapped a NIF-ID in NRC by using various regions of NRC in yeast two-hybrid assays. The domain was mapped to a 146-amino-acid region of NRC (amino acids 849 to 995) which also contains the LXXLL receptor-interacting domain of NRC. However, this LXXLL motif of NRC is not directly involved in the interaction of NRC with NIF-1 since mutation of the LXXLL motif (LVNLL to AVNAA), which eliminates NRC receptor interactions, did not alter the interaction of NRC with NIF-1. This suggests that NIF-1 and activated receptors could simultaneously interact with NRC. This finding is consistent with our observation that NIF-1 can enhance ligand-dependent transcriptional activation without directly interacting with nuclear hormone receptors.
We previously reported that NRC can enhance the activity of a large number of nuclear hormone receptors. In this study, we showed that NIF-1, which does not interact with receptors, also enhances the activity of expressed ER, TR, GR, and RAR in HeLa cells and endogenous TR and RXR in GH4C1 cells which contain NRC. In addition, the activity of c-Fos and c-Jun, which have been reported to be enhanced by NRC, are also enhanced by NIF-1. We presume that this modulation of ligand-bound nuclear hormone receptors by NIF-1 occurs through its interaction with NRC and not through the interaction of other factors. However, it is possible that NIF-1 could also be a component of other coactivator complexes not involving NRC. Further definition of whether NRC is required for the effect of NIF-1 on nuclear receptors, c-Fos, or c-Jun will require cells which do not express NRC.
Recently, in addition to NIF-1, three other factors, CAPER, PIMT, and CoAA (25, 26, 59), were reported to interact with NRC proteins (ASC-2/PRIP/TRBP). CAPER, PIMT, and CoAA are distinct proteins which each contain RNA binding motifs. In contrast, NIF-1 does not contain RNA binding motifs. CAPER was reported to interact directly with ER
and ERß but not with TR, GR, RXR, or PPAR, and it was reported to enhance activation by ER about threefold. PIMT appears to contain a methyltransferase activity. However, enhancement of stimulation by RXR or PPAR (
1.6-fold) did not require methyltransferase activity. Expression of CoAA enhanced the activity of GR, TR, and ER about threefold. Whether these changes reflect a direct or indirect interaction of PIMT or CoAA with nuclear receptors was not examined. Since CAPER, PIMT, and CoAA were each cloned as an interactor with NRC, further studies are needed to determine whether these factors, including NIF-1, are also integral components of other coactivator complexes in the cell.
Since NIF-1 does not directly associate with receptors but enhances their activities, it functions differently than previously described coactivators, which exert their effects through direct association with ligand-bound receptors. Thus, we suggest that NIF-1, and factors which behave similar to NIF-1, be referred to as cotransducers, which act in vivo either as part of a coactivator complex or downstream of a coactivator complex to modulate transcriptional activity. Examples of such factors include CARM1 and PRMT1 (11, 29, 53). How would a cotransducer such as NIF-1 enhance the activity of coactivators such as NRC? The mechanism(s) has not yet been defined, but it includes (i) the contribution of an activation surface, (ii) conformational alteration of a coactivator to expose an activation domain, (iii) interaction with other proteins to stabilize a multiprotein coactivator complex, (iv) direct association with the basal transcription machinery, or (v) modification of chromatin architecture as a BED domain protein. Since the Cys-2/His-2 class of zinc finger has been reported to be involved in DNA interactions, this raises the possibility that NIF-1 may directly bind DNA. Thus, in addition to being a component of a coactivator complex recruited to a transcription factor (e.g., nuclear receptors, c-Fos, and c-Jun) by a coactivator (e.g., NRC), NIF-1 might also act as a DNA-binding factor that modulates transcription by recruiting a coactivator complex to a specific target gene. Thus, NIF-1 may mediate its effects by acting through multiple mechanisms in the cell.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
-LBD vector, David Moore for the LexA-hTRß LBD, LexA-hGR LBD, LexA-hRXR
LBD, and LexA-hVDR LBD yeast vectors, Michael Garabedian for pJG4-5-hER
-LBD, Naoko Tanese for advice with phage screening, and Angus Wilson for the
gt10 human cDNA library. We also thank Shahana Mahajan for help. This research was supported by NIH grant DK16636 (to H.H.S.). Sequence analysis and database searches were done through the New York University Medical Center Research Computing Resource, which receives support from the National Science Foundation.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Aranda, A., and A. Pascual. 2001. Nuclear hormone receptors and gene expression. Physiol. Rev. 81:1269-1304.
3. Aravind, L. 2000. The BED finger, a novel DNA-binding domain in chromatin-boundary-element-binding proteins and transposases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:421-423.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Blanco, J. C. G., S. Minucci, J. Lu, X. J. Yang, K. K. Walker, H. Chen, R. M. Evans, V. Nakatani, and K. Ozato. 1998. The histone acetylase PCAF is a nuclear receptor coactivator. Genes Dev. 12:1638-1651.
5. Boyer, T. G., M. E. Martin, E. Lees, R. P. Ricciardi, and A. J. Berk. 1999. Mammalian Srb/mediator complex is targeted by adenovirus E1A protein. Nature 399:276-279.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Caira, F., P. Antonson, M. Pelto-Huikko, E. Treuter, and J. A. Gustafsson. 2000. Cloning and characterization of RAP250, a novel nuclear receptor coactivator. J. Biol. Chem. 275:5308-5317.
7. Carson-Jurica, M. A., W. T. Schrader, and B. W. O'Malley. 1990. Steroid receptor family: structure and functions. Endocr. Rev. 11:201-218.[Abstract]
8. Cavailles, N., S. Dauvois, F. L'Horset, S. Lopez, S. Hoare, P. J. Kushner, and M. G. Parker. 1995. Nuclear factor RIP140 modulates transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor. EMBO J. 14:3741-3751.[Medline]
9. Chakravarti, D., V. J. LaMorte, M. C. Nelson, T. Nakajima, I. G. Schulman, H. Juguilon, M. Montminy, and R. M. Evans. 1996. Role of CBP/P300 in nuclear receptor signalling. Nature 383:99-103.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Chakravarti, D., V. Ogryzko, H. Y. Kao, A. Nash, H. Chen, Y. Nakatani, and R. M. Evans. 1999. A viral mechanism for inhibition of p300 and PCAF acetyltransferase activity. Cell 96:393-403.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Chen, D., H. Ma, H. Hong, S. S. Koh, S. M. Huang, B. T. Schurter, D. W. Aswad, and M. R. Stallcup. 1999. Regulation of transcription by a protein methyltransferase. Science 284:2174-2177.
12. Chen, H., R. J. Lin, R. L. Schiltz, D. Chakravarti, A. Nash, L. Nagy, M. L. Privalsky, Y. Nakatani, and R. M. Evans. 1997. Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300. Cell 90:569-580.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Darimont, B. D., R. L. Wagner, J. W. Apriletti, M. R. Stallcup, P. J. Kushner, D. Baxter, R. J. Fletterick, and K. R. Yamamoto. 1998. Structure and specificity of nuclear receptor-coactivator interactions. Genes Dev. 12:3343-3356.
14. Feng, W., R. C. Ribeiro, R. L. Wagner, H. Nguyen, J. W. Apriletti, R. J. Fletterick, J. D. Baxter, P. J. Kushner, and B. L. West. 1998. Hormone-dependent coactivator binding to a hydrophobic cleft on nuclear receptors. Science 280:1747-1749.
15. Fondell, J. D., H. Ge, and R. G. Roeder. 1996. Ligand induction of a transcriptionally active thyroid hormone receptor coactivator complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:8329-8333.
16. Forman, B. M., J. Casanova, B. M. Raaka, J. Ghysdael, and H. H. Samuels. 1992. Half-site spacing and orientation determines whether thyroid hormone and retinoic acid receptors and related factors bind to DNA response elements as monomers, homodimers, or heterodimers. Mol. Endocrinol. 6:429-442.[Abstract]
17. Gyuris, J., E. Golemis, H. Chertkov, and R. Brent. 1993. Cdi1, a human G1 and S phase protein phosphatase that associates with Cdk2. Cell 75:791-803.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Hadzic, E., V. Desai-Yajnik, E. Helmer, S. Guo, S. Wu, N. Koudinova, J. Casanova, B. M. Raaka, and H. H. Samuels. 1995. A 10-amino-acid sequence in the N-terminal A/B domain of thyroid hormone receptor
is essential for transcriptional activation and interaction with the general transcription factor TFIIB. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4507-4517.[Abstract]
19. Hadzic, E., I. Habeos, B. M. Raaka, and H. H. Samuels. 1998. A novel multifunctional motif in the N-terminal A/B domain of T3R
modulates DNA-binding and receptor dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 273:10270-10278.
20. Hanstein, B., R. Eckner, J. DiRenzo, S. Halachmi, H. Liu, B. Searcy, R. Kurokawa, and M. Brown. 1996. p300 is a component of an estrogen receptor coactivator complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11540-11545.
21. Hart, C. M., O. Cuvier, and U. K. Laemmli. 1999. Evidence for an antagonistic relationship between the boundary element-associated factor BEAF and the transcription factor DREF. Chromosoma 108:375-383.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Heery, D. M., E. Kalkhoven, S. Hoare, and M. G. Parker. 1997. A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors. Nature 387:733-736.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Hong, H., K. Kohli, A. Trivedi, D. L. Johnson, and M. R. Stallcup. 1996. GRIP1, a novel mouse protein that serves as a transcriptional coactivator in yeast for the hormone binding domains of steroid receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:4948-4952.
24. Ito, M., C. X. Yuan, S. Malik, W. Gu, J. D. Fondell, S. Yamamura, Z. Y. Fu, X. Zhang, J. Qin, and R. G. Roeder. 1999. Identity between TRAP and SMCC complexes indicates novel pathways for the function of nuclear receptors and diverse mammalian activators. Mol. Cell 3:361-370.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Iwasaki, T., W. W. Chin, and L. Ko. 2001. Identification and characterization of RRM-containing coactivator activator (CoAA) as TRBP-interacting protein, and its splice variant as a coactivator modulator (CoAM). J. Biol. Chem. 276:33375-33383.
26. Jung, D. J., S. Y. Na, D. S. Na, and J. W. Lee. 2002. Molecular cloning and characterization of CAPER, a novel coactivator of activating protein-1 and estrogen receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 277:1229-1234.
27. Kamei, Y., L. Xu, T. Heinzel, J. Torchia, R. Kurokawa, B. Gloss, S.-C. Lin, R. A. Heyman, D. W. Rose, C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1996. A CBP integrator complex mediates transcriptional activation and AP-1 inhibition by nuclear receptors. Cell 85:403-414.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Ko, L., G. R. Cardona, and W. W. Chin. 2000. Thyroid hormone receptor-binding protein, an LXXLL motif-containing protein, functions as a general coactivator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6212-6217.
29. Koh, S. S., D. Chen, Y. H. Lee, and M. R. Stallcup. 2001. Synergistic enhancement of nuclear receptor function by p160 coactivators and two coactivators with protein methyltransferase activities. J. Biol. Chem. 276:1089-1098.
30. Lee, S. K., S. L. Anzick, J. E. Choi, L. Bubendorf, X. Y. Guan, Y. K. Jung, O. P. Kallioniemi, L. Kononen, J. M. Trent, D. Azorsa, B. H. Jhun, J. H. Cheong, Y. C. Lee, P. S. Meltzer, and J. W. Lee. 1999. A nuclear factor, ASC-2, is a cancer-amplified transcriptional coactivator essential for ligand-dependent transactivation by nuclear receptors in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 274:34283-34293.
31. Li, D., V. Desai-Yajnik, E. Lo, M. Schapira, R. Abagyan, and H. H. Samuels. 1999. NRIF3 is a novel coactivator mediating functional specificity of nuclear hormone receptors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:7191-7202.
32. Li, H., P. J. Gomes, and J. D. Chen. 1997. RAC3, a steroid/nuclear receptor-associated coactivator that is related to SRC-1 and TIF2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8479-8484.
33. Lill, N. L., S. R. Grossman, D. Ginsberg, J. DeCaprio, and D. M. Livingston. 1997. Binding and modulation of p53 by p300/CBP coactivators. Nature 387:823-827.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Mahajan, M. A., and H. H. Samuels. 2000. A new family of nuclear receptor coregulators that integrate nuclear receptor signaling through CREB-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5048-5063.
35. Mak, H. Y., S. Hoare, P. M. Henttu, and M. G. Parker. 1999. Molecular determinants of the estrogen receptor-coactivator interface. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:3895-3903.
36. Malik, S., W. Gu, W. Wu, J. Qin, and R. G. Roeder. 2000. The USA-derived transcriptional coactivator PC2 is a submodule of TRAP/SMCC and acts synergistically with other PCs. Mol. Cell 5:753-760.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. McInerney, E. M., D. W. Rose, S. E. Flynn, S. Westin, T. M. Mullen, A. Krones, J. Inostroza, J. Torchia, R. T. Nolte, N. Assa-Munt, M. V. Milburn, C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1998. Determinants of coactivator LXXLL motif specificity in nuclear receptor transcriptional activation. Genes Dev. 12:3357-3368.
38. McKenna, N. J., R. B. Lanz, and B. W. O'Malley. 1999. Nuclear receptor coregulators: cellular and molecular biology. Endocr. Rev. 20:321-344.
39. McKenna, N. J., and B. W. O'Malley. 2002. Combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear receptors and coregulators. Cell 108:465-474.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Naar, A. M., P. A. Beaurang, S. Zhou, S. Abraham, W. Solomon, and R. Tjian. 1999. Composite co-activator ARC mediates chromatin-directed transcriptional activation. Nature 398:828-832.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Nolte, R. T., G. B. Wisely, S. Westin, J. E. Cobb, M. H. Lambert, R. Kurokawa, M. G. Rosenfeld, T. M. Willson, C. K. Glass, and M. V. Milburn. 1998. Ligand binding and co-activator assembly of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
. Nature 395:137-143.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Onate, S. A., S. Y. Tsai, M.-J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley. 1995. Sequence and characterization of a coactivator of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 270:1354-1357.
43. Perkins, N. D., L. K. Felzien, J. C. Betts, K. Leung, D. H. Beach, and G. J. Nabel. 1997. Regulation of NF-kappaB by cyclin-dependent kinases associated with the p300 coactivator. Science 275:523-527.
44. Puigserver, P., Z. Wu, C. W. Park, R. Graves, M. Wright, and B. M. Spiegelman. 1998. A cold-inducible coactivator of nuclear receptors linked to adaptive thermogenesis. Cell 92:829-839.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Rachez, C., B. D. Lemon, Z. Suldan, V. Bromleigh, M. Gamble, A. M. Naar, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and L. P. Freedman. 1999. Ligand-dependent transcription activation by nuclear receptors requires the DRIP complex. Nature 398:824-828.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Ryu, S., and R. Tjian. 1999. Purification of transcription cofactor complex CRSP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:7137-7142.
47. Sun, X., Y. Zhang, H. Cho, P. Rickert, E. Lees, W. Lane, and D. Reinberg. 1998. NAT, a human complex containing Srb polypeptides that functions as a negative regulator of activated transcription. Mol. Cell 2:213-222.[CrossRef][Medline]
48. Takeshita, A., G. R. Cardona, N. Koibuchi, C. S. Suen, and W. W. Chin. 1997. TRAM-1, a novel 160-kDa thyroid hormone receptor activator molecule, exhibits distinct properties from steroid receptor coactivator-1. J. Biol. Chem. 272:27629-27634.
49. Toney, J. H., L. Wu, A. E. Summerfield, G. Sanyal, B. M. Forman, J. Zhu, and H. H. Samuels. 1993. Conformational changes in chicken thyroid hormone receptor
1 induced by binding to ligand or to DNA. Biochemistry 32:2-6.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Torchia, J., D. W. Rose, J. Inostroza, Y. Kamei, S. Westin, C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1997. The transcriptional co-activator p/CIP binds CBP and mediates nuclear-receptor function. Nature 387:677-684.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Voegel, J. J., M. J. Heine, M. Tini, V. Vivat, P. Chambon, and H. Gronemeyer. 1998. The coactivator TIF2 contains three nuclear receptor-binding motifs and mediates transactivation through CBP binding-dependent and -independent pathways. EMBO J. 17:507-519.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. Voegel, J. J., M. J. S. Heine, C. Zechel, P. Chambon, and H. Gronemeyer. 1996. TIF2, a 160 kDa transcriptional mediator for the ligand-dependent activation function AF-2 of nuclear receptors. EMBO J. 15:3667-3675.[Medline]
53. Wang, H., Z. Q. Huang, L. Xia, Q. Feng, H. Erdjument-Bromage, B. D. Strahl, S. D. Briggs, C. D. Allis, J. Wong, P. Tempst, and Y. Zhang. 2001. Methylation of histone H4 at arginine 3 facilitating transcriptional activation by nuclear hormone receptor. Science 293:853-857.
54. Ways, D. K., W. Qin, P. Cook, P. J. Parker, J. B. Menke, E. Hao, A. M. Smith, C. Jones, J. M. Hershman, M. E. Geffner, F. Su, H. H