Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2002, p. 8467-8477, Vol. 22, No. 24
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.24.8467-8477.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Vascular Biology, Institute of Physiology,1 Institute of Biochemistry, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland,2 Department of Cell Pharmacology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Showa, Nagoya, Aichi 466-8500, Japan3
Received 27 February 2002/ Accepted 11 September 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
eNOS-mediated NO generation is a highly regulated cellular event. The mechanisms controlling eNOS activity involve multiple regulatory steps including gene expression, co- and posttranslational modification, intracellular localization, cofactors and phosphorylation (20). Although eNOS was originally described as a constitutive enzyme with enzyme activation achieved via calmodulin (CaM) binding in response to increased Ca2+, recent studies indicate that a variety of stimuli can modulate its expression at the transcriptional (15) and/or posttranscriptional level (6). Moreover, it is evidenced that phosphorylation of eNOS also modulates eNOS activity independent of Ca2+/CaM. Studies showed that Ser-1177 of human eNOS (Ser-1179 of bovine sequence) is phosphorylated directly by protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt (10, 18, 37), which results in an increase in electron flux through the reductase domain and increase in NO production (36). Shear stress and insulin have been shown to activate eNOS through the activation of PKB (14, 41). eNOS phosphorylation at Ser-1177 by PKB therefore represents another important regulatory mechanism of eNOS activation in addition to Ca2+/CaM-dependent pathway.
The Rho GTPase is a member of the Ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins (48). It cycles between inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound forms, and exerts the function through its effectors (25). Rho was initially identified as a signaling molecule that regulates cytoskeletal rearrangement and was considered to be primarily involved in cellular functions that are associated with cytoskeleton organization, such as platelet aggregation, smooth muscle cell (SMC) contraction, and cell migration. More recently, additional roles, including the regulation of gene expression and cell proliferation, have been reported (5, 45). All of these Rho-regulated cellular functions are important for the pathogenesis of vascular disease and have been gaining increasing attention in the cardiovascular research (17, 32). Moreover, studies from our own and other laboratories demonstrated that Rho via its downstream effector Rho kinase (ROCK) is also involved in eNOS gene expression by affecting its mRNA stability (12, 30, 31). However, the mechanism by which Rho/ROCK downregulates eNOS mRNA stability remains elusive, and a role of Rho/ROCK in regulation of eNOS enzyme activation is not known. Recently, simvastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase that blocks the synthesis of isoprenoids and thus inhibits lipid attachment for Rho and its subsequent membrane translocation and activation (32) was shown to activate PKB (29), which induce eNOS activation. This prompted us to investigate whether there is a cross talk between Rho/ROCK and the PKB pathway, and if so, whether this cross talk regulates eNOS phosphorylation and is responsible for the downregulation of eNOS expression by Rho.
|
|
|---|
-phosphatidyl-L-serine, L-
-phosphatidylinositol-4,5-diphosphate sodium salt and platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) were from Sigma; Redivue [
-32P]ATP and L-[U-14C]arginine monohydrochloride were from Amersham; thin-layer chromatography plates (silica-60; WF2545) from Merck; endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS) was from PromoCell GmbH; anti-eNOS monoclonal antibody was from BD Transduction Laboratory; anti-RhoA monoclonal antibody, protein A/G Plus-agarose, and glutathione-agarose were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.; anti-Akt, anti-phospho-Akt (Ser-473 and Thr-308) antibodies, anti-phospho-eNOS (Ser-1177) antibody, and the Akt kinase assay kit were from Cell Signaling Technology; anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10) agarose conjugate was from Upstate Biotechnology; anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) alkaline phosphatase (AP) conjugate and Western Blue stabilized substrate for AP from Promega. The recombinant glutathione S-transferase (GST)-TRBD (Rhotekin Rho binding domain 7-89 amino acid) fusion protein was purified as described previously (39). All of the cell culture materials were purchased from Gibco. Cultivation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and hSMCs. Endothelial cells were isolated from human umbilical veins as described previously (12). Briefly, fresh blood vessels were harvested in cold sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with antibiotics (100 U of penicillin and 100 µg of streptomycin/ml). The vessels were incubated with collagenase type II 75 U/ml for 20 min in PBS. Cell pellets were then collected by centrifugation, seeded in culture dishes coated with 1% gelatin and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 20 mmol of L-glutamine/liter, HEPES buffer solution, 100 U of penicillin and 100 µg of streptomycin/ml, 50 µg of ECGS/ml, 25 µg of heparin/ml, and 5% fetal calf serum (FCS). Endothelial cells are characterized by typical cobblestone and nonoverlapping appearance and indirect immunofluorescence staining by using specific antibodies against von Willebrand factor. Cultivation of human SMCs (hSMCs) isolated from human saphenous veins has been described prevously (51).
Generation of recombinant adenoviruses (rAd).
Expression plasmid encoding an active RhoA (pcDNA3.1-Rho63L) and a dominant-negative RhoA (pcDNA3.1-Rho19N) were kindly provided by Joseph J. Baldassare (24). pCMV constructs encoding a hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged active PKB (pCMV-m/p-HA-PKB
) and an inactive PKB (pCMV-HA-PKB
-K179A) were from B. Hemmings (3). pEF-BOS-myc constructs encoding a constitutively active ROCK (pEF-BOS-myc-CAT) and a dominant-negative form of ROCK [pEF-BOS-myc-RB/PH (TT)] have been described previously (1).
Generation of recombinant adenovirus expressing hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged RhoA, ROCK, and PKB
mutants driven by the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter was carried out through homologous recombination between cotransformed virusmid and the corresponding adenoviral transfer plasmid in Escherichia coli as described previously (21). The corresponding cDNAs were first subcloned into the adenoviral transfer vector pSTCO-HA.mcs for Rho and ROCK mutants or pcDNA3.1 for PKB
mutants, allowing the insertion of the transgene into the E1 region of a cloned
E1
E3 adenoviral backbone (vmRL-CMV1 or vmAdcDNA3, respectively) bearing an empty expression cassette homologous to the one of the pSTCO-HA.mcs or pcDNA3.1, respectively. The transfer plasmid pSTCO-HA-Rho63L, -Rho19N, -CAT, and -RB/PH (TT) was then digested with AclI and XhoI and cotransformed with SwaI-linearized vmRL-CMV1 into a recombination-proficient E. coli strain (BJ5183) by electroporation to allow homologous recombination in BJ5183. The plasmid pcDNA3.1-m/p-HA-PKB
and pcDNA3.1-HA-PKB
-K179A were digested with StuI and SspI and cotransformed with SwaI-linearized vmAdcDNA3 into BJ5183. The candidate recombinants were subsequently screened by colony PCR, followed by retransformation of positive clones into another strain HB101, allowing higher plasmid yield. The resultant recombinant virusmids were digested with PacI and transfected into E1-complementing packaging cells (HER911) to generate recombinant adenovirus. The primary crude lysates of the recombinant adenoviruses were prepared as viral stocks and used to infect HER911 cells for scale up of the viral preparation. The viral titer was determined by plaque assay. The recombinant adenovirus expressing HA-tagged LacZ and green fluorescent protein (rAd-HA-LacZ and rAd-GFP) was described previously (21).
Adenoviral infection. HUVECs were maintained in complete RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% FCS and ECGS at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and were passaged when they reached confluence. Cells were seeded at a density of 2 x 105/6-cm dish in complete RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% FCS and ECGS. 2 days later, cells were infected with the recombinant adenovirus at titers ranging from a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100 to 150 and further incubated in 0.2% FCS RPMI 1640 supplemented with ECGS for 18 h or 48 h before treatment and extraction.
Western blot. Cell extracts were prepared by lysing cells in extraction buffer (120 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 20 mM NaF, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 30 mM 4-nitrophenyl phosphate disodium salt hexahydrate, 1% NP-40, and 0.1 M phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]) as described previously (38). Next, 40-µg extracts were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electrophoretically transferred to an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore), and the resultant membrane was incubated overnight with the corresponding first antibody at 4°C with gentle agitation after being blocked with 5% skimmed milk. The protein was decorated with a corresponding anti-mouse or anti-rabbit AP-conjugated secondary antibody and detected by using Western Blue stabilized substrate. Quantification of the signals was performed by using NIH Image 1.62 software. In all of the plotted graphics, each point represents the average value from three to five independent experiments.
PKB/Akt kinase assay.
PKB/Akt kinase activity was analyzed by nonradioactive immunoprecipitation-kinase assay using the Akt kinase assay kit from Cell Signaling Technology. Then, 30-µg cell extracts (200 µl) were incubated 2 h with immobilized Akt 1G1 monoclonal antibody. After an extensive washing, the kinase reaction was performed at 30°C for 30 min in the presence of 200 µM cold ATP and GSK-3 substrate. Phosphorylation of GSK-3 was measured by Western blot by using phospho-GSK-3
/ß (Ser-21/9) antibody.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI 3-kinase) activity assay.
Cell extracts were prepared by lysing cells on ice for 15 min by the addition of 250 µl of lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 138 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl (pH 8.0) supplemented with 5% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM sodium-o-vanadate, 20 µM leupeptin, 18 µM pepstatin, 1% NP-40, 5 mM EDTA, and 20 mM NaF. Cell debris and nuclei were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, and 100 µg of the cell lysate was then immunoprecipitated with anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10) agarose conjugate for 3 h at 4°C. The agarose beads containing the immune complexes were next washed twice with wash buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 0.5 M LiCl) and twice with kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4; 5 mM MgCl2) and were then resuspended in 60 µl of kinase buffer (50) containing 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, 60 µM ATP, and 10 µg each of phosphatidylserine and PI 4,5-diphosphate (PIP2). The kinase reaction was allowed to continue for 10 min at 30°C. The reaction was then stopped by the addition of 200 µl of 1 N HCl. The lipid reaction products were extracted with 400 µl of CH3Cl-methanol (1:1), dried, and then resuspended in 20 µl of spotting solution (CH3Cl-methanol [2:1]) and analyzed on oxalate-treated thin-layer chromatography silica gel plate by using CH3Cl-acetone-methanol-acetic acid-H2O (80:30:26:24:14 [vol/vol/vol/vol/vol]) as the separation solvent. The product of PIP3 was quantified by phosphorimager densitometry (Bio-Rad) using ImageQuant software Quantity One (Bio-Rad).
Measurement of eNOS activity (L-citrulline assay). eNOS activity was measured by L-citrulline assay as previously described (22). Adenovirus-infected semiconfluent HUVECs were incubated at 37°C for 30 min in HEPES buffer (pH 7.4): 10 mM HEPES, 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 10 mM glucose, and 1.5 mM CaCl2 containing 0.25% bovine serum albumin. Then, 0.5 µCi of L-[14C]arginine/ml was added to each dish for 1 h before the reaction was stopped with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5 mM L-arginine and 4 mM EDTA. The cells were then denatured in 96% ethanol. After evaporation the soluble cellular components were dissolved in 20 mM HEPES-Na (pH 5.5) and applied to well-equilibrated Dowex (Na+ form) colum. The pellets were dissolved in Western blot extraction buffer for protein concentration determination. The [14C]citrulline content of the eluate was quantified by liquid scintillation counting. Citrulline production by the different infections was expressed in picomoles per microgram of cellular protein obtained after subtracting the basal citrulline release. The basal release was determined from the L-NAME (100 µM), 30-min preincubation-inhibitable radioactivity in noninfected cells.
Pull-down assay of GTP-RhoA. The activation of RhoA was assessed by a pull-down assay as described previously (44). In brief, HUVECs were washed with ice-cold Tris-buffered saline and lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.2; 1% Triton X-100; 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate; 500 mM NaCl; 10 mM MgCl2; 10 µg each of leupeptin and aprotinin/ml; 1 mM PMSF). Next, 200 µg of cell lysates was incubated with 10 µg of GST-TRBD beads at 4°C for 60 min. The beads were washed four times with buffer B (Tris buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 µg each of leupeptin and aprotinin/ml, and 0.1 mM PMSF). Bound Rho proteins were then detected by Western blot by using a monoclonal antibody against RhoA (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The total amount of RhoA in cell lysates was used as a control for the cross-comparison of Rho activity (level of GTP-bound Rho).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effects of Rho/ROCK on eNOS gene expression. (A) HUVECs were infected with recombinant adenovirus (rAd) expressing HA-tagged LacZ, active Rho (Rho63), dominant-negative Rho (Rho19), active ROCK (CAT), and dominant-negative ROCK (RB) as indicated, at titers ranging from 100 to 150 MOI, and incubated in 0.2% FCS-RPMI 1640 supplemented with ECGS for 48 h. Cells were then extracted without any treatment, and the expression of the transgenes were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HA antibody 12CA5. (B) The effect of the various transgenes on eNOS expression was examined by Western blotting with anti-eNOS antibody. (C) HUVECs were infected with recombinant adenovirus as indicated and serum-starved in 0.2% FCS culture medium for 24 h, followed by treatment with thrombin (4 U/ml) for 48 h. The expression of eNOS was detected by Western blotting. Actin in lower panels served as control for loading.
|
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Active Rho or ROCK inhibits phosphorylation and activity of PKB without affecting p85-PI 3-kinase activity. (A) HUVECs were infected and extracted as described in Fig. 1A. Panel a shows the effect of Rho or ROCK mutants on PKB activity. A total of 30 µg of lysates was used for immunoprecipitation with immobilized Akt 1G1 monoclonal antibody and subjected to in vitro kinase assay with GSK-3 as substrate. Phosphorylation of GSK-3 was measured by Western blot with phospho-GSK-3 /ß (Ser-21/9) antibody. In panel b, the extent of PKB phosphorylation was analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies specific for phosphorylated Thr-308 or Ser-473 of PKB as indicated, whereas total PKB expression was detected by Western blotting with antibodies that recognize PKB regardless of their phosphorylation status (lower panel). Shown are representative Western blots of five independent experiments. (B) HUVECs were either uninfected or infected, as indicated, and extracted at 18 h p.i. To inhibit PI 3-kinase, cells were treated with 250 nM wortmannin (WM) for 2 h before extraction. Cell lysates were assayed for PKB phosphorylation at Ser-473. (C) Lanes 1 to 6, HUVECs were either left uninfected or were infected as indicated and extracted at 18 h p.i. Cell lysates were assayed for PKB phosphorylation at Ser-473 (panel a) and in vitro PI 3-kinase activity in anti-phosphotyrosine (PY) immunoprecipitates (panel b) as described in Materials and Methods. Quantification of signal intensities by using the average of five independent experiments is shown in the right panels. Lanes 7 and 8, cell lysates prepared from untreated and PDGF-treated (50 ng/ml of PDGF-BB for 10 min) hSMCs were included as a positive control for PI 3-kinase activation.
|
v integrins (34, 35, 42). To demonstrate that the PKB activation upon adenoviral infection shown in Fig. 2A is PI 3-kinase dependent, PI 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin was used to block PI 3-kinase activation. In agreement with the established role of PI 3-kinase in PKB activation, integrin-mediated PKB activation upon control adenoviral infection was effectively inhibited by wortmannin treatment (Fig. 2B). Next, we sought to determine whether activation of Rho/ROCK pathway inhibits PI 3-kinase activation by analyzing the effect of active Rho or ROCK on PI 3-kinase activity in an in vitro PI 3-kinase assay in anti-phosphotyrosine immunoprecipitates (Fig. 2Cb). Surprisingly, in contrast to the strong phosphorylation or activation of PKB upon adenoviral infection (Fig. 2Ca, compare lane 1 with lane 2) and inhibition of PKB phosphorylation or activation by active Rho or ROCK (Fig. 2Ca, compare lanes 3 and 5 with lane 2), no obvious corresponding changes in PI 3-kinase activity could be observed, only a low basal PI 3-kinase activity was detected (Fig. 2Cb, lanes 1 to 6). To ensure that the whole procedures from cell extraction to immunoprecipitation with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody and lipid kinase reaction work properly to allow a detection of an PI 3-kinase activation, cell lysates were prepared from PDGF-stimulated hSMCs and included as a positive control for PI 3-kinase activation (Fig. 2Cb, lanes 7 and 8). Given that the inhibition of PI 3-kinase with wortmannin resulted in inhibition of PKB phosphorylation or activation (Fig. 2B), these data suggest that, in HUVECs and under our experimental condition, the basal PI 3-kinase activity is required for the PKB activity; however, PKB activation is unlikely to result from an activation of PI 3-kinase but may be from other mechanism such as inhibition of PTEN, inhibition of phosphatase 2A or even other unknown novel mechanism. The yet-to-be-clarified mechanism responsible for PKB activation would be therefore the target of Rho/ROCK to negatively regulate PKB activation shown here. Effect of Rho/ROCK on eNOS phosphorylation. The fact that PKB activates eNOS by phosphorylating the enzyme at Ser-1177 (10, 18, 37), and that Rho/ROCK suppresses PKB activation (Fig. 2), suggested that Rho/ROCK might negatively regulate eNOS activation, besides having suppression of its gene expression. To test this hypothesis, the effect of Rho or ROCK on eNOS phosphorylation at Ser-1177 was analyzed. Indeed, in parallel with the inhibition on PKB phosphorylation and activation (Fig. 2), eNOS phosphorylation was also suppressed upon expression of active Rho or ROCK (Fig. 3A). To verify that eNOS enzyme activity parallels its phosphorylation, eNOS activity was measured in parallel under the same experimental conditions by in vivo L-citrulline assay. In agreement with the previously demonstrated role of eNOS phosphorylation at Ser-1177 in activation of eNOS enzyme activity (10, 18, 37), eNOS activity correlates well with the eNOS phosphorylation (Fig. 3A, right panel), indicating that the modulation of the Rho/ROCK on eNOS phosphorylation indeed reflects their effects on eNOS activity. Of note, in contrast to experiments shown in Fig. 1B where cell lysates were prepared at 48 h postinfection (p.i) and eNOS expression was clearly downregulated upon active Rho or ROCK expression, in these experiments the cell lysates were prepared at 18 h p.i. to ensure that the suppression of eNOS phosphorylation is not a consequence of downregulation of eNOS expression by Rho or ROCK. As shown in Fig. 3A, lower panel, there was no significant effect on eNOS expression yet at this time point. Moreover, coexpression of the dominant-negative ROCK (RB) prevented Rho63-mediated decrease in both PKB phosphorylation and eNOS phosphorylation (Fig. 3B). To rule out the possibility that the reversal effect of RB on phosphorylation of PKB and eNOS is due to unexpected transcriptional effects on Rho63, the expression of Rho63 in the absence or presence of RB was determined by Western blot. No obvious difference was observed under this condition (Fig. 3C). We conclude that Rho not only downregulates eNOS expression (Fig. 1) (12, 30, 31) but also inhibits eNOS phosphorylation and activity via its downstream target ROCK.
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Rho inhibits phosphorylation of PKB and eNOS in parallel via its downstream target ROCK. Cells were infected as indicated and extracted at 18 h p.i. A representative Western blot from five (A) or three (B) independent experiments is shown under various conditions as indicated. Quantification of the data is shown in the corresponding right panels. (A) The extent of eNOS phosphorylation was analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies specific for phosphorylated Ser-1177 of eNOS (upper panel), whereas eNOS expression was analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies that recognize eNOS regardless of its phosphorylation status (lower panel). In parallel, under the same experimental conditions, eNOS activity was monitored by analyzing the cellular NO production measured as the formation of its coproduct [14C]citrulline. (B) The extent of eNOS and PKB phosphorylation was analyzed as described in Fig. 3A and 2, respectively. (C) The expression of HA-tagged LacZ, RB, and Rho63 was detected by Western blotting with monoclonal anti-HA antibody 12CA5.
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Active PKB reversed Rho63-mediated inhibition of phosphorylation but not of the expression of eNOS. Cells were infected as indicated, and the cell lysates were prepared 18 h p.i. (A and B) or 48 h p.i. (C). A representative Western blot from five independent experiments is shown under various conditions as indicated. Quantification of the data by using an average of five independent experiments is shown in the corresponding right panels. (A) Effect of PKB on Rho63-mediated dephosphorylation of eNOS and PKB and on cellular NO production measured as the formation of [14C]citrulline. (B) The expression of HA-tagged LacZ, active PKB (m/p), inactive PKB (KA), and Rho63 detected by Western blot with monoclonal anti-HA antibody 12CA5. (C) Effect of PKB on Rho63-mediated downregulation of eNOS gene expression.
|
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Role of Rho and PKB in thrombin-mediated downregulation of eNOS phosphorylation and expression. (A) Time course of Rho activation by thrombin. HUVECs were serum starved for 24 h and then treated with 4 U of thrombin/ml for the indicated time. The cell lysates were subjected to pull-down assay of GTP-Rho as described in Materials and Methods. (B) Effect of dominant-negative Rho (Rho19) and active PKB (m/p) on thrombin-induced dephosphorylation of eNOS and PKB. Cells were infected as indicated and serum starved in 0.2% FCS culture medium without ECGS for 24 h. The cells were then either left untreated (-) or were treated with 4 U of thrombin/ml (+) for 15 min. (C) Effect of Rho19 and m/p-PKB on thrombin-mediated downregulation of eNOS gene expression. Cells were infected and serum starved as in panel B, except that cells were treated with thrombin for 48 h instead of 15 min. Shown are representative blots from three (panel A) or five (panels B and C) independent experiments. Quantification of the data under each condition is shown in the corresponding right panels.
|
|
|
|---|
Rho GTPase has been shown to regulate a wide spectrum of cellular function (48). Increasing evidence suggests a role of Rho-regulated cellular function in mediating cardiovascular pathologies, such as smooth muscle hypercontraction (47), SMC growth and migration that account for neointimal formation of stenosis (13, 46), and platelet aggregation (40, 43). Moreover, in recent years, much has been learned about the role of Rho in modulating endothelial function. In the context of endothelial dysfunction, Rho has been reported to downregulate eNOS expression (12, 30, 31) and is essential for the basal production of endothelin-1 (23), a potent vasoconstrictor and mitogen that regulates vascular tone and remodeling (33). In agreement with previous reports, we demonstrate here that activation of Rho is sufficient to downregulate eNOS expression and is required for thrombin-mediated decrease in eNOS expression (Fig. 1). Moreover, in the present study, we provide additional evidence for an important role of Rho in modulating PKB/eNOS pathway. We show that the activation of Rho, either by ectopic expression of active mutant of Rho or by a pathological stimulus thrombin dramatically inhibited phosphorylation of eNOS in parallel to that of PKB (Fig. 2 and 3). Of interest, whereas thrombin-induced dephosphorylation of eNOS occurs within 15 min (Fig. 5B), it takes hours to days to achieve downregulation of eNOS expression (Fig. 5C) (12, 30, 31). The same is true with the constructs expressing active Rho or ROCK. Due to the fact that it takes at least more than 8 h to express the transgenes, we do not know exactly how rapidly the dephosphorylation was induced upon Rho63 expression. However, eNOS dephosphorylation could be already observed at 18 h p.i., at a time point when eNOS expression was not yet significantly affected (Fig. 3 and 4A). In this respect, signals such as thrombin would cause endothelial dysfunction via the activation of Rho that in turn leads to dephosphorylation or inactivation of eNOS and suppression of its gene expression. This mechanism may play an important role in acute coronary syndromes in patients with heart disease.
To date, a number of downstream effector proteins of Rho have been identified (5). Among them, ROCK is the most extensively studied. Many of the Rho-regulated cellular functions have been shown to be mediated by ROCK, such as smooth muscle contraction (2, 26, 28), cytoskeletal rearrangement and c-fos expression (7), and cytokinesis (52). We show here that Rho-induced dephosphorylation of PKB and eNOS is also mediated by ROCK. This conclusion is based on the observations that the active ROCK led to dephosphorylation of both PKB and eNOS (Fig. 2 and 3A), the dominant-negative ROCK prevented Rho63-mediated inhibition of PKB and eNOS phosphorylation (Fig. 3B).
Another important evidence we provide in this report is the cross talk between Rho/ROCK and PKB. The importance of this finding should be underscored by the fact that PKB serves as a multifunctional regulator of cell survival, growth, and glucose metabolism (9). With respect to its cardiovascular functions, PKB plays a critical role in endothelial cell survival (16, 19) and promotes angiogenesis (11, 29) mediated by vascular endothelial growth factor, in addition to its involvement in controlling vasomotor activity via regulating eNOS pathway as mentioned above. Here we demonstrate that the cross talk between Rho/ROCK and PKB pathways is responsible for Rho-mediated eNOS dephosphorylation. Two lines of evidence supported the involvement of PKB in Rho/ROCK-mediated inhibition of eNOS phosphorylation. The first evidence came from experiments with constitutively active mutants. The data in Fig. 2 and 3 show that dephosphorylation of PKB and eNOS by active Rho or ROCK closely parallel one another. The second piece of evidence is provided by the rescue experiment in which an active PKB, but not an inactive PKB, restored phosphorylation of eNOS in the presence of active Rho (Fig. 4A). Since evidence has been presented that eNOS phosphorylation by PKB led to increased NO production, we wish to point out that active PKB restored eNOS phosphorylation in the presence of active Rho mutant without restoring cellular NO production (Fig. 4A). Taking into account that eNOS activity was monitored by measuring the cellular NO production in living cells with L-[14C]arginine and that the effects of Rho and ROCK mutants on eNOS phosphorylation and cellular NO production parallel each other (Fig. 3A), a probable explanation would be that Rho/ROCK pathway may also downregulate other factors such as the availability of the substrate arginine or eNOS cofactor that are necessary for a normal cellular NO production but through other pathway(s) independent of PKB.
Although the role of PKB in eNOS phosphorylation leading to increased NO production is well documented and established, little is know about an involvement of PKB in eNOS gene expression. In view of the fact that PI 3-kinase was reported to be involved in eNOS gene expression (8, 27), and PKB is a well-characterized downstream signaling of PI 3-kinase, it is important to point out that active PKB did not rescue Rho63- or thrombin-mediated eNOS gene downregulation (Fig. 4C and 5C), indicating that PKB is not required for Rho63 or thrombin to downregulate eNOS expression. However, this does not rule out a role of PKB in the regulation of eNOS gene expression. One possibility could be that PKB does not play a role in the regulation of eNOS mRNA stability by thrombin or Rho and yet is involved in eNOS transcriptional regulation as reported in one study regarding regulation of eNOS gene expression by PI 3-kinase (8).
Regarding a role of PI 3-kinase in Rho/ROCK-mediated downregulation of PKB phosphorylation and activity by active mutants of Rho/ROCK, our data suggest that the inhibition of PKB activity by Rho/ROCK is unlikely to result from inhibition of PI 3-kinase activity since the PKB activation upon adenoviral infection or the inhibition of PKB activation by active Rho/ROCK is not accompanied by corresponding changes in PI 3-kinase activity (Fig. 2C). This is noteworthy in view of the fact that PI 3-kinase is strongly activated upon adenoviral infection in the human colon carcinoma cell line SW480 (34, 35). Thus, although the basal PI 3-kinase activity is required for PKB phosphorylation and activity in HUVECs under our experimental conditions (Fig. 2B), the PKB activation probably did not result from PI 3-kinase activation but may be from other mechanism such as inactivation of PTEN, inactivation of phosphatase 2A, or even some other unknown novel mechanism. What mechanism accounts for the PKB activation and would be therefore the target of Rho/ROCK to negatively regulate PKB activation reported in this study remains to be shown.
The data presented here are summarized as follows: a stimulus that activates Rho/ROCK pathway would lead to dephosphorylation of eNOS while simultaneously suppressing its expression by decreasing its mRNA stability to achieve rapid and long-term decrease in NO production. Whereas inhibition of PKB by Rho/ROCK is responsible for the negative regulation of eNOS phosphorylation, the downregulation of eNOS expression is attributed to another yet-to-be-identified pathway. An important task will be to further elucidate the mechanism by which Rho/ROCK inactivates PKB. In addition, the impact of the cross talk between the two pathways on other PKB-regulated cellular functions should be a worthwhile goal for future research.
and pCMV-HA-PKB
-K179A, and M. A. Schwartz for pGEX-2T-TRBD. This work was supported by the Swiss National Research Foundation (Nr 31-63811.00), the Stanley Thomas Johnson foundation, Roche Research Foundation (63-2000), and the Swiss Heart Foundation. X.-F.M. was a recipient of MHV-fellowship of Swiss National Research Foundation (Nr 32-63170.00).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»