Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2002, p. 1027-1035, Vol. 22, No. 4
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.4.1027-1035.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211
Received 1 October 2001/ Returned for modification 2 November 2001/ Accepted 28 November 2001
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B, YY-I, Sp1, and SAF transcription factor DNA-binding elements. Although SAA biosynthesis takes place mostly in the liver, nonhepatic expression of this protein appears to be important because many pathological conditions, such as amyloidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and atherosclerosis, that are linked to abnormal SAA expression are manifested in nonhepatic organs. Induction of the rabbit gene for SAA2 in nonhepatic tissues is regulated primarily by activation of the SAF family of transcription factors, which contain multiple Cys2-His2-type zinc fingers at the C-terminal end (44). A member of this family, SAF-1, shows a high degree of homology with MAZ/Pur-1 proteins, and this suggests that SAF-1 is a member of the MAZ/Pur-1 family of transcription factors (6, 22). Members of the SAF-1/MAZ/Pur-1 family of proteins are involved in the regulation of a variety of genes, including those for SAA, c-myc, insulin, CD4, the serotonin 1A receptor,
-fibrinogen, CLC-K1, and phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (6, 12, 18, 22, 36, 38, 44, 55). SAF-1 DNA-binding activity is normally detected in many tissues at a low level, but many inflammatory agents, including lipopolysaccharide (48), IL-1, IL-6 (45), and minimally modified low-density lipoprotein (46), are known to increase its DNA-binding activity and overall transactivating potential. In a recent study, we have shown that protein kinase C ß regulates phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-mediated activation of SAF-1 (39). As different inflammatory agents are known to activate different signaling pathways, it is likely that an additional protein kinase(s) is involved in the regulation of SAF activity in response to diverse inflammatory agents. The mechanisms by which SAF-1 and other members of its family are activated in response to IL-1 and IL-6 are unclear. The present study was undertaken to address this aspect. IL-1 and IL-6, in conjunction with tumor necrosis factor alpha, have been found to participate in the induction of a broad group of acute-phase proteins during periods of inflammation (16). The effector cascades through which IL-1 and IL-6 mediate their regulatory response have been elucidated, at least in part, and shown to include the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signal transduction pathways (1, 5, 9, 11, 17, 21, 23, 25, 35, 37, 51, 54). MAP kinases are a family of protein serine/threonine kinases that are activated in response to various extracellular stimuli and mediate signal transduction from the cell surface to the nucleus. In mammalian cells, three major MAP kinase pathways have been identified (reviewed in reference 9). These include the ERK (p42/p44 MAPK), JNK/SAPK, and p38MAPK group of proteins. Due to considerable structural similarities, multiple MAP kinase pathways are often activated by the same stimulus. However, there are many instances that show that each MAP kinase pathway has its own regulatory features that allow each member to be unique.
The amino acid sequence P-X-S/T-P, in which X is any amino acid, has been identified as a consensus MAP kinase recognition site in which either S or T is the phosphorylation site (2). The SAF-1 protein contains a PAPPPTPQAP sequence at its amino-terminal end that can act as a potential MAP kinase phosphorylation site. In the present report, we show that inhibitors of the MAP kinase signaling pathway markedly reduce expression of SAF-regulated promoters. Furthermore, by using two forms of SAF-1 with mutations at the MAP kinase phosphorylation site, we show that both the DNA-binding and transactivating abilities of SAF-1 are regulated by MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids. An SAF-CAT reporter plasmid was constructed by ligating three tandem copies of the SAF DNA-binding element, bp -254 to -226 of the SAA promoter (48), into plasmid vector pBLCAT2 (29). Plasmid pCMVFLAG-SAF1 was prepared by first attaching, in frame, the FLAG epitope at the N terminus of the full-length SAF-1 cDNA; the resulting FLAG-SAF1 cDNA was further subcloned in vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen).
Mutagenesis and production of bacterium expressed wild-type and mutant SAF-1 proteins. Threonine-to-alanine and threonine-to-valine substitution mutant proteins were generated by megaprimer PCR using appropriate oligonucleotides approximately 35 bp in length. In order to effectively amplify the GC-rich sequences present in the SAF-1 sequence, GC-melt (CLONTECH) was added to the PCR mixture. The PCR products were subcloned in vector pTZ19U (U.S. Biological Corp.) and sequenced for verification of mutations. A FLAG epitope was attached at the N-terminal end prior to subcloning in the pcDNA3 vector for expression in eukaryotic cells.
For bacterial expression and preparation of proteins, wild-type SAF1 cDNA and mutant SAF1 cDNAs were subcloned in vector pAR(
R1)59/60 (4), which contains a FLAG epitope and a heart muscle kinase phosphorylation site. The recombinant proteins were produced in bacterial strain BL21(DE3)pLysS. Briefly, after cell growth to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5, isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added (1 mM final concentration) to induce protein synthesis and cells were grown for another 4 h. Recombinant proteins were purified with an anti-FLAG antibody column (Sigma Chemical Co.).
Construction of a chimeric GAL4-SAF1 plasmid. Plasmid RSV-GAL4DBD (15), encoding the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 (amino acids 1 to 147), driven by the Rous sarcoma virus promoter, and followed by a BamHI site, was used to prepare a GAL4-SAF1 construct. The wild type and two substitution mutant forms, threonine to alanine and threonine to valine, of the full-length SAF-1 cDNA were fused in frame C terminal to GAL4 amino acids 1 to 147 at the BamHI site. The resulting RSV-GAL4DBD-SAF1 plasmid and mutant derivative clones were subjected to DNA sequencing to verify in-frame coding of the fusion protein. A reporter CAT-encoding gene with minimum basal activity and three tandem copies of the GAL4 binding element, known as the upstream activating sequence (UAS), was used to monitor the transactivation potential of the chimeric proteins.
In vitro phosphorylation and immunoprecipitation.
The phosphorylation reaction was performed in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)-10 mM MgCl2-100 µM unlabeled ATP-10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (6,000 Ci/mmol)-0.1 µg of affinity-purified FLAG epitope-containing wild-type and mutant SAF-1 protein or 20 to 50 ng of synthetic SAF-1 peptide-1.0 U of purified MAP kinase (Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp.) at 30°C for 30 min in a total volume of 50 µl. Phosphorylated synthetic SAF peptide was fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-14% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and 32P-labeled phosphopeptide was detected by autoradiography. The samples containing the FLAG epitope-tagged SAF protein were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.) by gentle agitation at 4°C for 16 h in immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1% [vol/vol] NP-40, 0.1% SDS, 2.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mg of benzamidine per ml). Next, 50 µl of protein G-agarose beads (Boehringer Mannheim) was added and the mixture was further incubated for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were washed five times with immunoprecipitation buffer, resuspended in 10 µl of SDS-PAGE sample loading buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 2% SDS, 5% ß-mercaptoethanol), and boiled for 10 min prior to SDS-11% PAGE.
To determine the target amino acid in the 32P-labeled phosphopeptide that is phosphorylated by MAP kinase, the radioactive phosphopeptide was excised from the dry polyacrylamide gel, eluted with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 7.8)-0.1% SDS-5% ß-mercaptoethanol, and precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid. The phosphopeptide was completely hydrolyzed in 6 N HCl at 110°C for 2 h. Phosphoamino acids were separated by thin-layer chromatography and detected by autoradiography, and their migration positions were compared with those of authentic phosphoamino acid markers.
In vivo phosphorylation and immunoprecipitation. HIG82 and HepG2 cells were grown in cultures in DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum for 24 h. The cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate (0.5 mCi/ml) in phosphate-free DMEM for 8 h with or without cytokines, a combination of IL-1ß (200 U/ml) and IL-6 (500 U/ml) and MAP kinase inhibitors as indicated. Some cells received a 20 µM concentration of either PD98059, SB203580, or SB202474. In a separate in vivo phosphorylation of SAF-1, HIG82 cells were transfected with either wild-type SAF-1 or two mutant derivatives, SAF-1(V71) and SAF-1(A71). In addition, some transfection reaction mixtures contained a MAP kinase (ERK1) expression plasmid (provided by M. Cobb). Forty hours after transfection, the cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate as described above. After labeling, the 32P-labeled cells were washed quickly in phosphate-free DMEM and lysed by addition of hot lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 1% SDS, 1% NP-40, 3 mM vanadate, 2.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The lysates were collected in microcentrifuge tubes and heated at 95°C, and the SDS concentration was reduced to 0.05% by addition of lysis buffer without SDS. The 32P-labeled proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-SAF1 antibody or preimmune serum by incubation of the mixture for 16 h at 4°C. Next, protein G-Sepharose beads (Boehringer Mannheim) were added and the mixture was further incubated for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were extensively washed, resuspended in SDS-PAGE sample loading buffer, and boiled for 10 min. The samples were analyzed by SDS-11% PAGE and autoradiographed.
Nuclear extracts and EMSA. Nuclear extracts were prepared as described earlier (47) from HIG82 and HepG2 cells that were treated with various agents as described in the figure legends and elsewhere in the text. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed with nuclear extracts containing equal protein amounts as described previously (47). Protein concentrations were measured by Bradford's method (7). Bacterium-expressed and affinity-purified FLAG-SAF1 proteins, both wild-type and mutant forms, were used in the EMSA as the source of DNA-binding factor. For antibody interaction studies, anti-SAF1 serum (48) and anti-FLAG serum (Sigma Chemical Co.) were added to the reaction mixture during preincubation for 30 min on ice. Radiolabeled probes were prepared by incorporating 32P at the double-stranded SAF DNA-binding element. Two complementary oligonucleotides, 5"-GGCTTCCTCTCCACC-3" and 3"-CGAAGGAGAGGTGGG-5", were annealed to prepare the double-stranded SAF DNA-binding element.
Bacterium-expressed wild-type and mutant SAF-1 proteins (0.1 µg) were phosphorylated with 1.0 U of activated mouse MAP kinase (Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp.) in a volume of 10 µl. After phosphorylation, proteins were incubated with the radioactive SAF DNA-binding element probe in accordance with the EMSA procedure described earlier (39). In some reaction mixtures, SB220025 (200 µM) was added during in vitro phosphorylation of proteins. In some reaction mixtures, calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (4 U), with or without phosphatase inhibitors (NaF [50 mM], okadaic acid [5 µM], and sodium orthovanadate [1 mM]), was added during in vitro phosphorylation of the proteins.
Western blot analysis. Cell lysates (50 µg of protein) prepared from transfected cells were separated by SDS-11% PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with phosphate-buffered saline-0.05% Tween 20 supplemented with 5% nonfat dry milk at room temperature for 2 h. Anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma) was diluted 1:1,000 in phosphate-buffered saline-0.05% Tween 20 buffer plus 1% bovine serum albumin, and the membrane was incubated for 24 h in this buffer at 4°C. In some reaction mixtures, anti-SAF1 antibody was used. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody was used as the secondary antibody. Bands were detected by using a chemiluminescence detection system (Amersham Life Science Ltd.).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
-32P]ATP, and purified MAP kinase (Fig. 4B). Further analysis revealed threonine as the phosphate acceptor (Fig. 4C). These data suggested that the PPTP sequence motif of SAF-1 is a potential phosphorylation site for MAP kinase.
|
-32P]ATP and further immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG antibody (Fig. 5B). A Western blot assay was done to verify the input and integrity of SAF-1 proteins in each lane (Fig. 5C). While wild-type SAF-1 was phosphorylated by MAP kinase (Fig. 5B, lane 2), both of the mutant proteins remained unphosphorylated (Fig. 5B, lanes 5 and 8), indicating that mutation of the PPTP region abrogates the ability of MAP kinase to phosphorylate this protein. The specificity of this assay was verified by using SB220025, which inhibited the phosphorylation of the wild-type SAF-1 protein (Fig. 5B, lane 3). This result also indicated that only one MAP kinase phosphorylation site, threonine 71, is present in SAF-1.
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SAF-1 contains one MAP kinase phosphorylation site, PPTP, in the N-terminal region. A similar sequence motif that can be found in the human MAZ and mouse Pur-1 proteins remains uncharacterized. Conservation of this structural motif among these diverse species is indicative of its indispensability. Here, we showed that this site can be phosphorylated by MAP kinase and that mutation of Thr-71, at the core of this motif, reduces the DNA-binding ability and transactivating potential of mutant proteins. In vivo phosphorylation of SAF-1 during IL-1- and IL-6-mediated stimulation of cells was significantly diminished in the presence of inhibitors of MAP kinase (Fig. 3). However, the fact that these inhibitors did not completely block in vivo phosphorylation of SAF-1 indicates that other protein kinases are also involved, albeit at a lower level, in the phosphorylation of SAF-1 during cytokine stimulation of cells. It is interesting that SB203580 and SB202190 are more effective than PD98059 at inhibiting SAF-1 activity. PD98059 is known to be more specific for inhibition of the MEK
ERK signaling pathway (34), while SB203580 and SB202190 are selective in the regulation of the p38 MAP kinase group of proteins (24, 49). Because both groups of inhibitors inhibited SAF-1 function, we believe that SAF-1 can be activated by both the ERK1/2 and p38 MAP kinase signaling pathways, perhaps at different levels. The significance of the participation of both signaling pathways is not clear, but the possibility of cross talk between these two different pathways cannot be ruled out. Involvement of ERK1/2 and p38 MAK kinase in the regulation of transforming growth factor ß-mediated induction of the aggrecan-encoding gene was recently demonstrated (57).
Exactly how MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation enhances the DNA-binding ability and transactivating potential of SAF-1 is still not very clear from the results of this study. The MAP kinase phosphorylation site is present at the N-terminal region of SAF-1, which appears to contain a transactivating domain. This notion is supported by the results presented in Fig. 9. The GAL4 reporter system, which depends on the presence of an activation domain from a heterologous system, showed that MAP kinase phosphorylation site mutation impairs the transactivation potential of SAF-1. However, an increase in the DNA-binding ability of SAF-1 could arise due to the presence of a DNA-binding domain in this region that becomes activated during phosphorylation. It is equally possible that, under normal conditions, SAF-1 remains in such a form that its DNA-binding domain is masked by the N-terminal end. Phosphorylation by MAP kinase at the N-terminal end not only increases its transactivation potential but also unmasks the DNA-binding domain and thereby increases its DNA-binding ability. The exact nature and location(s) of the different domains of SAF-1 have yet to be determined. However, it is tempting to speculate that phosphorylation of threonine 71 changes the configuration of SAF-1 in such a way that not only favors its increased binding to the promoter but also facilitates its interaction with other proteins involved in associating with the basal transcriptional machinery. Incidentally, phosphorylation of CREB by protein kinase A improves its interaction with the components of transcription factor IID (14). It is also possible that phosphorylation increases SAF-1's ability to interact with other transcription factors that might act as a bridge between SAF-1 and the basal transcriptional machinery. Consistent with this possibility, we have seen that interaction of SAF-1 with Sp1 synergistically enhances its transactivation potential (45). Since Sp1 is known to recruit transcription factor IID via its interaction with TAFII130 (33), association of Sp1 with SAF-1 possibly acts as a bridge between SAF-1 and TAFs. Further investigation along this line, which is under way, is necessary for proper understanding.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to M. Cobb, M. Blanar, and E. Flemington for generous gifts of pCMV-ERK1, pAR(
RI)59/60, pRSVGAL4DBD, and GAL4-CAT plasmid DNA samples.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Alvarez E., I. C. Northwood, F. A. Gonzalez, D. A. Latour, A. Seth, C. Abate, T. Curran, and R. J. Davis. 1991. Pro-Leu-Ser/Thr-Pro is a consensus primary sequence for substrate protein phosphorylation. Characterization of the phosphorylation of c-myc and c-jun proteins by an epidermal growth factor receptor threonine 669 protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 266:15277-15285.
3.
Betts, J. C., J. K. Cheshire, S. Akira, S., T. Kishimoto, and P. Woo. 1993. The role of NF-
B and NF-IL6 transactivating factors in the synergistic activation of human serum amyloid A gene expression by interleukin-1 and interleukin-6. J. Biol. Chem. 268:25624-25631.
4.
Blanar, M. A., and W. J. Rutter. 1992. Interaction cloning: identification of a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that interacts with c-Fos. Science 256:1014-1018.
5.
Blenis, J. 1993. Signal transduction via the MAP kinases: proceed at your own RSK. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5889-5892.
6.
Bossone, S. A., C. Asselin, A. J. Patel, and K. B. Marcu. 1992. MAZ, a zinc finger protein binds to c-myc and C2 gene sequences regulating transcriptional initiation and termination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:7452-7456.
7. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
8.
Brinckerhoff, C. E., T. I. Mitchell, M. J. Karmilowicz, B. Kluve-Beckerman, and M. D. Benson. 1989. Autocrine induction of collagenase by serum amyloid A-like and 2-microglobulin-like proteins. Science 243:655-657.
9.
Cobb, M. H., and E. J. Goldsmith. 1995. How MAP kinases are regulated. J. Biol. Chem. 270:14843-14846.
10.
Coetzee, G. A., A. F. Strachan, D. R. van der Westhuyzen, H. C. Hoppe, M. S. Jeenah, and F. C. DeBeer. 1986. Serum amyloid A containing human high density lipoprotein 3: density, size and apolipoprotein composition. J. Biol. Chem. 261:9644-9651.
11. Dinarello, C. A. 1998. Interleukin-1, interleukin-1 receptors and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist. Int. Rev. Immunol. 16:457-499.[Medline]
12. Duncan, D. D., A. Stupakoff, S. M. Hedrick, K. B. Marcu, and G. Siu. 1995. A Myc-associated zinc finger protein binding site in one of the four important functional regions in the CD4 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3179-3186.[Abstract]
13.
Edbrooke, M. R., D. W. Burt, J. K. Cheshire, and P. Woo. 1989. Identification of cis-acting sequences responsible for phorbol ester induction of human serum amyloid A gene expression via a nuclear factor
B-like transcription factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:1908-1916.
14.
Ferreri, K., G. Gill, and M. Montminy. 1994. The cAMP-regulated transcription factor CREB interacts with a component of the TFIID complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1210-1213.
15.
Flemington, E. K., S. H. Speck, and W. G. Kaelin. 1993. E2F-1-mediated transactivation is inhibited by complex formation with the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:6914-6918.
16. Ganapathi, M. K., D. Rzewnicki, D. Samols, S. L. Jiang, and I. Kushner. 1991. Effect of combinations of cytokines and hormones on synthesis of serum amyloid A and C-reactive protein in Hep3B cells. J. Immunol. 147:1261-1265.[Abstract]
17. Garrington, T. P., and G. I. Johnson. 1999. Organization and regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11:211-218.[CrossRef][Medline]
18.
Her, S., R. A. Bell, A. K. Bloom, B. J. Siddall, and D. L. Wong. 1999. Phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase gene expression. Sp1 and Maz potential for tissue-specific expression. J. Biol. Chem. 274:8698-8707.
19.
Huang, J. H., and W. S. L. Liao. 1994. Induction of mouse serum amyloid A3 gene by cytokines requires both C/EBP family proteins and a novel constitutive factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4475-4484.
20. Husebekk, A. B., B. Skogen, G. Husby, and G. Marhaug. 1985. Transformation of amyloid precursor SAA to protein-AA and incorporation in amyloid fibrils in vivo. Scand. J. Immunol. 21:283-287.[CrossRef][Medline]
21.
Itoh, S., T. Hattri, H. Hayashi, Y. Mizutani, M. Todo, T. Takii, D. Yang, J. C. Lee, S. Matsufuji, Y. Murakami, T. Chiba, and K. Onozaki. 1999. Antiproliferative effect of IL-1 is mediated by p38 MAP kinase in human melanoma cell A375. J. Immunol 162:7434-7440.
22.
Kennedy, G. C., and W. J. Rutter. 1992. Pur-1, a zinc finger protein that binds to purine rich sequences, transactivates an insulin promoter in heterologous cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:11498-11502.
23. Kishimoto, T., T. Taga, and S. Akira. 1994. Cytokine signal transduction. Cell 76:253-262.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Lee, J. C., J. T. Laydon, P. C. McDonnell, T. F. Gallagher, S. Kumar, D. Green, D. McNulty, M. J. Blumenthal, J. R. Heys, S. W. Landvatter, J. E. Strickler, M. M. McLaughlin, I. R. Slemens, S. M. Fisher, G. P. Livi, J. R. White, J. L. Adams, and P. R. Young. 1994. A protein kinase involved in the regulation of inflammatory cytokine biosynthesis. Nature 372:739-746.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Lewis, T. S., P. S. Shapiro, and N. G. Ahn. 1998. Signal transduction through MAP kinase cascades. Adv. Cancer Res. 74:49-139.[Medline]
26.
Li, X., and W. S. L. Liao. 1991. Expression of rat serum amyloid A1 gene involves both C/EBP like and NF-
B like transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 266:15192-15201.
27. Liang, J. S., and J. D. Sipe. 1995. Recombinant human serum amyloid A (apoSAAp) binds cholesterol and modulates cholesterol flux. J. Lipid Res. 36:37-46.[Abstract]
28.
Lowell, C. A., R. S. Stearman, and J. F. Morrow. 1986. Transcriptional regulation of serum amyloid A gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 261:8453-8461.
29.
Luckow, B., and G. Schutz. 1987. CAT constructions with multiple unique restriction sites for the functional analysis of eukaryotic promoters and regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:5490.
30. Mackiewicz, A., M. K. Ganapathi, D. Scultz, D. Samols, J. Reese, and I. Kushner. 1988. Regulation of rabbit acute phase protein biosynthesis by monokines. Biochem. J. 253:851-857.[Medline]
31. Malle, E., A. Steinmetz, and J. G. Raynes. 1993. Serum amyloid A (SAA): an acute phase protein and apolipoprotein. Atherosclerosis 102:131-146.[CrossRef][Medline]
32.
Meek, R. L., S. Ureili-Shoval, and E. P. Benditt. 1994. Expression of apolipoprotein serum amyloid A mRNA in human atherosclerotic lesions and cultured vascular cells: implications for serum amyloid A function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3186-3190.
33.
Näar, A. M., P. A. Beaurang, K. M. Robinson, J. D. Oliner, D. Avizonis, S. Scheek, J. Zwicker, J. T. Kadonaga, and R. Tjian. 1998. Chromatin, TAFs, and a novel multiprotein coactivator are required for synergistic activation by Sp1 and SREBP-1a in vitro. Genes Dev. 12:3020-3031.
34.
Pang, L., T. Sawada, S. J. Decker, and A. R. Saltiel. 1995. Inhibition of MAP kinase kinase blocks the differentiation of PC-12 induced by nerve growth factor. J. Biol. Chem. 270:13585-13588.
35. Park, J., G. J. Gores, and T. Patel. 1999. Lipopolysaccharide induces cholangiocyte proliferation via an IL-6 mediated activation of p44/p42 MAP kinase. Hepatology 29:1037-1043.[CrossRef][Medline]
36.
Parks, C. L., and T. Shenk. 1996. The serotonin 1A receptor gene contains a TATA less promoter that responds to MAZ and Sp1. J. Biol. Chem. 271:4417-4430.
37.
Raingeaud, J. S. Gupta, J. S. Rogers, M. Dickens, J. Han, R. J. Ulevitch, and R. J. Davis. 1995. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and environmental stress cause p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation by dual phosphorylation on tyrosine and threonine. J. Biol. Chem. 270:7420-7426.
38.
Ray, A. 2000. A SAF binding site in the promoter region of human
-fibrinogen gene functions as an IL-6 response element. J. Immunol. 165:3411-3417.
39.
Ray, A., A. P. Fields, and B. K. Ray. 2000. Activation of transcription factor SAF involves its phosphorylation by protein kinase C. J. Biol. Chem. 275:39727-39733.
40.
Ray, A., M. Hannink, and B. K. Ray. 1995. Concerted participation of NF-
B and C/EBP heteromer in lipopolysaccharide induction of serum amyloid A gene expression in liver. J. Biol. Chem. 270:7365-7374.
41. Ray, A., and B. K. Ray. 1993. Analysis of the promoter element of serum amyloid A gene and its interaction with constitutive and inducible nuclear factors from rabbit liver. Gene Expr. 3:151-162.[Medline]
42.
Ray, A., and B. K. Ray. 1994. Serum amyloid A gene expression under acute-phase conditions involves participation of inducible C/EBP-ß and C/EBP-
and their activation by protein phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4324-4332.
43. Ray, A., and B. K. Ray. 1996. A novel cis-acting element is essential for cytokine-mediated transcriptional induction of the serum amyloid A gene in nonhepatic cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:1584-1594.[Abstract]
44.
Ray, A., and B. K. Ray. 1998. Isolation and functional characterization of cDNA of serum amyloid A-activating factor that binds to the serum amyloid A promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:7327-7335.
45.
Ray, A., H. Schatten, and B. K. Ray. 1999. Activation of Sp1 and its functional co-operation with serum amyloid A-activating sequence binding factor in synoviocyte cells trigger synergistic action of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 in serum amyloid A gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 274:4300-4308.
46. Ray, B. K., S. Chatterjee, and A. Ray. 1999. Mechanism of minimally modified LDL-mediated induction of serum amyloid A gene in monocyte/macrophage cells. DNA Cell Biol. 18:65-73.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Ray, B. K., and A. Ray. 1997. Involvement of an SAF-like transcription factor in the activation of serum amyloid A gene in monocyte/macrophage cells by lipopolysaccharide. Biochemistry 36:4662-4668.[CrossRef][Medline]
48.
Ray, B. K., and A. Ray. 1997. Induction of serum amyloid A (SAA) gene by SAA-activating sequence-binding factor (SAF) in monocyte/macrophage cells. Evidence for a functional synergy between SAF and Sp1. J. Biol. Chem. 272:28948-28953.
49.
Saklatvala, J., L. Rawlinson, R. J. Waller, S. Sarsfield, J. C. Lee, L. F. Morton, M. J. Barnes, and R. W. Farndale. 1996. Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in platelet aggregation caused by collagen or a thromboxane analogue. J. Biol. Chem. 271:6586-6589.
50. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
51. Schlessinger, J. 1994. SH2/SH3 signaling proteins. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 4:25-30.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. Sipe, J. D. 1994. Amyloidosis. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 31:325-354.
53. Strissel, K. J., M. T. Girard, J. A. West-Mays, W. B. Rinehart, J. R. Cook, C. E. Brinckerhoff, and M. E. Fini. 1997. Role of serum amyloid A as an intermediate in the IL1 and PMA-stimulated signaling pathways regulating expression of rabbit fibroblast collagenase. Exp. Cell. Res. 237:275-287.[CrossRef][Medline]
54. Taga, T., and T. Kishimoto. 1997. Gp130 and the interleukin-6 family of cytokines. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15:797-819.[CrossRef][Medline]
55.
Uchida, S., Y. Tanaka, H. Ito, F. Saitoh-Ohara, J. Inazawa, K. K. Yokoyama, S. Sasaki, and F. Marumo. 2000. Transcriptional regulation of the CLC-K1 promoter by myc-associated zinc finger protein and kidney-enriched Krüppel-like factor, a novel zinc finger repressor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:7319-7331.
56. Uhlar, C. M., and A. S. Whitehead. 1999. Serum amyloid A, the major vertebrate acute-phase reactant. Eur. J. Biochem. 265:501-523.[Medline]
57.
Watanabe, H., M. P. de Caestecker, and Y. Yamada. 2001. Transcriptional cross-talk between Smad, ERK1/2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways regulates transforming growth factor-ß-induced aggrecan gene expression in chondrogenic ATDC5 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:14466-14473.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|