Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2002, p. 1150-1157, Vol. 22, No. 4
0270-7306/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.4.1150-1157.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267,1 Neurology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital East, Charlestown, Massachusetts 021292
Received 13 June 2001/ Returned for modification 20 August 2001/ Accepted 2 November 2001
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
How NF2 functions as a tumor suppressor is being intensively studied. The type and location of mutations do not predict schwannoma cell proliferation (18). Schwannoma cells express the Schwann cell marker proteins S100 and vimentin and often the intermediate filament protein GFAP (20, 21) and usually grow slowly in vitro (16, 32, 35).
The NF2 protein, merlin or schwannomin, belongs to the ERM (ezrin-moesin-radixin) family of membrane-cytoskeleton linking proteins. ERM proteins have N-terminal halves that interact with membrane proteins and a C-terminal region that mediates binding to the actin cytoskeleton (2). Merlin lacks the C-terminal actin-binding site common to ERM proteins but binds actin via its N-terminal domain (6, 48). Merlin also interacts with the cytoskeleton indirectly through ERM proteins (11, 15, 24, 27, 29). If merlin regulates the actin cytoskeleton, loss of NF2 in schwannomas is expected to cause tumor formation through disruption of cell shape, cell matrix, and cell-cell communication or signaling functions attributed to actin-plasma membrane interactions.
Comparison of primary normal human Schwann cells (NHSCs) and cells isolated from schwannomas (32) revealed striking differences between the two cell types. Schwannoma cells had five- to sevenfold-larger surface areas and actin-rich membrane ruffles on contact with laminin that were absent in NHSCs. The actin cytoskeletal changes could not be linked to the NF2 mutation because genetic information on the tumors analyzed was unavailable.
If these cytoskeletal abnormalities are due to the absence of merlin, then introduction of merlin into these cells should rescue the aberrant cytoskeletal phenotype. To carry out quantitative experiments on the very small numbers of primary human schwannoma cells available, and since human Schwann cells are largely resistant to transfection and retroviral infection (16), we used the technique of TAT protein transduction pioneered by Nagahara et al. (28). When added to culture medium, TAT proteins enter cells in a concentration-dependent manner and are refolded, presumably by endogenous chaperones (28, 40). Using this technique, we generated merlin fusion proteins containing an 11-amino-acid NH2-terminal domain from the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) TAT protein. Here we present evidence that merlin isoform 1 reverses the abnormal cytoskeletal phenotypes of schwannoma cells from tumors that occurred sporadically or in NF2 or schwannomatosis patients.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genetic analysis of tumor specimens. We amplified the first 15 NF2 exons from genomic tumor DNA and separated products on nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels to identify single-strand conformational polymorphisms (SSCP) (19). Comparison with known controls allowed identification of aberrant mobility. Sequencing determined the molecular basis for each aberration. SSCP and sequencing of genomic DNA from peripheral blood specimens were limited to exons with alterations in paired tumor specimen. Loss-of-heterozygosity analysis used primer pairs from polymorphic microsatellite markers proximal to NF2 (D22S275 and D22S193), distal to NF2 (D22S268 and D22S430), and intragenic markers (D22S929 and NF2TET) (19). We analyzed all blood tumor pairs with a minimum of two informative markers.
Cell culture. Normal human nerves were bathed for 5 days in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)-10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)-penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco)-2 µM forskolin (Calbiochem)-14 ng of recombinant human glial growth factor (rhGGF2) per ml (23). Medium was changed every two days. Tumors were dissociated immediately on receipt in the lab. Nerve and tumor dissociation was done for 4 to 6 h at 37°C in 20 ml of L15 medium (Gibco) with 1.25 U of dispase (Boehringer-Mannheim) per ml, 0.05% collagenase (Worthington Biochemicals), and gentamicin (50 µg/ml). Samples were centrifuged, and pellets were resuspended in serum-free N2 medium with 2 µM forskolin plus 14 ng of rhGGF and 50 µg of gentamicin per ml (growth medium) and then plated onto poly-L-lysine-coated dishes (32). To avoid cell loss, tumor cells were plated in 100 µl of growth medium for 10 min, and then 1.5 ml of growth medium was added. Typical tumor specimens resulted in sufficient cells for plating in a single 35-mm dish.
Expression and purification of TAT-merlin. We used primer-based PCR to tag the human cDNAs encoding merlin isoforms 1 and 2 with a human c-Myc epitope (24) and inserted them into the EcoRI site of pTAT (28), producing pmTAT-NF2-1 and pmTAT-NF2-2, respectively. Mutant merlin (L64P), found in some NF2 patients and segregating with disease (http://neurosurgery.mgh.harvard.edu/NFresrch.htm), was generated using the Quick Change mutagenesis kit (Strategene). Sequencing confirmed the fidelity of PCR amplification and in-frame ligation.
Bacterial clones of BL21(DE3) transformed with pTAT-NF2-1 or pTAT-NF2-2 were cultured in Luria-Bertani broth to an optical density at 280 nm of 0.5 to 0.6. Isopropyl-1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) was then added to 0.4 mM. After 3 to 5 h of shaking at low speed, cells were pelleted at 3,000 x g and then suspended in lysis buffer (300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 0.1% Triton X-100). After 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 100 µg of lysozyme per ml addition, the cell suspension was placed on ice for 20 min, ultrasonicated, and then clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant contained native TAT-merlin that was further purified using Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid column and a desalting PD-10 column (28). Protein concentration was measured with a BCA kit (Pierce).
Ruffling assays. Purified TAT protein was added to the N2 medium bathing schwannoma cells for 5 h. The cells were then washed and trypsinized, and 5 x 103 to 10 x 103 cells were plated onto laminin-coated cover slips as a 20-µl drop in N2 medium (32). Fifteen minutes later, wells were flooded with N2 plus 10% FBS for 30 min, and then cells fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. To identify Schwann cells, we stained with anti-rabbit S100ß antibody (1:6,000, Dako) followed by tetramethyl rhodamine isocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Jackson Labs) and 4,4-difluoro-3a,4a-diaza-S-indacene BODIPY Fluor or Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (Molecular Probes) for visualizing microfilaments. Monoclonal anti-Myc antibody 9E10 was used to visualize TAT-merlin. Cells were viewed and photographed on a Zeiss LSM510. Percent membrane ruffling was calculated as the number of S100-positive Schwann cells exhibiting ruffles divided by the total number of Schwann cells counted. For each sample, at least 100 Schwann cells were counted.
Perimeter measurements. Five thousand cells were plated on laminin-coated cover slips, allowed to adhere for 15 min, and then incubated in N2 plus 10% FBS for 3 h. Cells were fixed and stained as described above. For each sample, the perimeters of 20 cells were traced, and areas were calculated using Metamorph software (Universal Imaging).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Genetic analysis of tumor and blood specimens. A possible explanation for variability in the percentage of cells showing aberrant actin cytoskeleton within an individual tumor is that specific NF2 mutations influence the extent of ruffling and cell spreading. To determine whether variability in the percentage of cells with ruffling correlates with a specific type of NF2 mutation, genetic analysis was performed on tumors from eight NF2 patients and three schwannomatosis patients. Typical mutations were detected in the NF2 gene in 9 of 11 tumors studied (Table 2). In six of eight tumors from NF2 patients, the mutation detected was also present in the corresponding blood sample, indicating that it was the germ line mutation causing the patient's NF2. None of the mutations detected in tumors from schwannomatosis patients were detected in the blood sample, consistent with previous results showing lack of germ line NF2 mutation in these patients (19).
|
Second hits were detected in 7 of 12 tumors studied. In a single case (NF2-3), a second mutation was detected in the tumor and not found in the blood sample. In six other tumors, loss of heterozygosity of flanking and/or intragenic markers was seen in the tumor specimen relative to the blood. In all cases, loss or retention was seen with all informative markers studied, as expected. The data are consistent with loss of NF2 function in schwannoma cells, but the extent of the F-actin cytoskeletal abnormalities did not correlate with the type of NF2 mutation.
TAT-linked merlin protein enters schwannoma cells. To test the feasibility of using TAT-linked proteins to transduce cells, TAT-merlin protein with a C-terminal Myc tag was generated (Fig. 2A and B).Normal human Schwann cells in culture contain such low levels of merlin that it is not detectable on Western blots. Normal human Schwann cells treated with TAT-merlin for 5 h and then washed contained TAT-merlin (detected by anti-Myc) on Western blotting (Fig. 2C, lane 2). When 5 h of exposure was followed by a 16-h washout (Fig. 2C, lane 3), little Myc-tagged merlin was detected. Schwannoma cells were incubated with TAT-merlin and then washed, fixed, and stained with anti-Myc antibody (Fig. 2E). After 5 h of incubation, merlin protein was detected at the plasma membrane, as anticipated (10, 38, 39, 42). All cells were labeled by anti-Myc, indicating merlin introduction. Since Myc staining was not detectable with shorter incubations, subsequent experiments used 5 h of incubation in TAT proteins.
|
|
|
We previously showed that schwannoma cells ruffle on contact with fibronectin and collagen as well as on laminin. Because laminin and fibronectin but not collagen are enriched in schwannomas, we tested if the reversal occurs on fibronectin. TAT-merlin isoform 1 but not TAT-merlin L64P inhibited ruffling of schwannoma cells plated onto fibronectin (not shown). The percentages of inhibition of ruffling on fibronectin and laminin were identical.
Coverslips containing cells exposed to TAT-merlin isoform 1 had significantly fewer schwannoma cells than did the untreated cells. Thirty minutes after plating, the number of TAT-merlin isoform 1-treated cells adhering to the coverslips decreased in a dose-dependent manner; at 60 µg of TAT-merlin isoform 1 per ml in three experiments with cells from three different schwannomas, 34, 6, and 21% of cells were adherent (not shown) compared to untreated controls. Lack of attachment was not observed when cells were treated with TAT-merlin isoform 2 or when NHSCs were treated with TAT-merlin isoform 1 at 60 µg/ml (not shown). When TAT-merlin-treated schwannoma cells were counted 3 h after plating, 72% of cells were attached (not shown). Thus, concurrent with loss of ruffling, introduction of merlin causes transient inhibition of cell attachment.
Three hours after plating, most TAT-merlin isoform 1-treated schwannoma cells had surface areas smaller than those of the untreated controls and comparable to those of NHSCs. Figure 4C shows size measurements on cells from a sporadic schwannoma, a schwannoma from an NF2 patient, and a schwannoma from a schwannomatosis patient. In each case, exposure to TAT-merlin isoform 1 but not TAT-merlin isoform 2 dramatically reduced cell size.
To determine the specificity of this approach, normal human Schwann cells were treated with TAT-merlin isoform 1, TAT-merlin L64P, or merlin with no TAT. No changes in cell morphology were observed (not shown). No cells with ruffling membranes or increase in cell size were detected (not shown). Furthermore, the number of attached cells was not significantly different in each group (number of attached cells: no TAT-merlin, 855 cells/coverslip; TAT-merlin L64P, 836 cells/cover- slip; TAT-merlin isoform 1, 968 cells/coverslip).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Schwannoma cells, like normal Schwann cells, express matrix-binding integrins
2ß1 and
6ß1 (34). Within schwannomas, cells are surrounded by a laminin- and fibronectin-rich matrix (5). Cells bind to the matrix via cell surface receptors, including a ß1 integrin, with which merlin coprecipitates (30). Our previous data showed ruffling and spreading defects when schwannoma cells contact laminin and fibronectin (32). Here we show that schwannoma cells of all three classes ruffle on contact with laminin. TAT-merlin reversed ruffling on both laminin and fibronectin.
Integrin activation stimulates Rho and Rac GTPases, to which ERM proteins have been directly linked (22, 41). Shaw et al. placed merlin in the Rac-JNK signaling pathway and showed that merlin is a substrate for Rac-mediated phosphorylation (43). They proposed a model in which active, dephosphorylated merlin attenuates Rac signals and inactive, phosphorylated merlin potentiates Rac signaling. Our results in schwannoma cells, which lack merlin, are consistent with this model, as they have increased ruffling that can be inhibited by dominant negative Rac (32). Hyperactivation of Rac may result from elevated Rac activation, decreased Rac inactivation, or merlin-mediated control of Rac localization. The lack of biochemical quantities of schwannoma cells precludes differentiation among these possibilities at this time.
In addition to its role in actin cytoskeletal organization (33), Rac signaling can enhance cell proliferation stimulated by adhesion to fibronectin (26). Overexpression of merlin increased cell growth in confluent cells, and merlin and the haluronic acid receptor CD44 form a molecular switch specifying cell growth arrest or proliferation (27).
We chose to focus our analysis on schwannoma cell cytoskeletal defects for several reasons. First, cell proliferation is elevated in cells from some but not all schwannomas, while cytoskeletal defects are present in cells from all tumors (32). Second, cytoskeletal alterations may be linked to changes in cell growth and ultimately tumor formation. Altered schwannoma cell-matrix interactions are likely to be relevant to cell growth and the integrity of the cytoskeleton.
The percentage of schwannoma cells exhibiting membrane ruffling and increased cell size varies from tumor to tumor. There seem to be two populations of Schwann cells per tumor, one that exhibits cytoskeletal abnormalities and one that does not, because the percentage of cells with abnormal actin cytoskeleton does not change with increased passage number. We cannot exclude the possibility that phenotypic differences reflect normal Schwann cells within the sample through contamination from normal nerve during tumor resection. However, genetic analysis failed to reveal large amounts of contaminating wild-type allele, and several tumors analyzed were removed via open craniotomy, making this unlikely (see the discussion in reference 45). The reproducible heterogeneity among cells from individual tumors might also reflect the two histological areas in schwannomas, Antoni A and B (7), with cells from these regions having different phenotypes. A related possibility is a predisposition for a second genetic event(s) occurring in some but not all cells.
The severity of individual patients' disease was not obviously correlated with the extent of membrane ruffling or cell size. For example, two tumors from a single patient with severe disease (NF2-5 and NF2-6) had high ruffling membranes but one had 35% and the other 100% large cells. Two other patients, NF2-8 and NF2-1, had very similar severe disease, but 40 and 35% of their cells were ruffled.
Also, there was no correlation between the percentage of cells with aberrant ruffling and those that had large cell size in a given tumor cell strain, and ruffling was observed independent of cell size. This leaves open the possibility of different genetic or epigenetic changes in addition to NF2 mutation underlying the two phenotypes. The idea that an additional mutation(s) secondary to NF2 mutation is necessary for formation of schwannomas is supported by evidence in the NF2 conditional knockout mouse. In these mice, schwannomas occur at low frequency, although most Schwann cells are predicted to have lost NF2 function (9). If mutations occur at loci other than NF2 in human schwannoma formation, they remain unidentified.
We hypothesized that if lack of merlin causes abnormal cytoskeletal organization, then adding merlin back to schwannoma cells would reverse the phenotype. Initiating mutations, when reversed, are sufficient to control tumor growth even late in tumorigenesis (4). When treated with TAT-merlin isoform 1, schwannoma cells exhibited a decrease in membrane ruffling and had a smaller surface area. There are several reasons to believe that this effect was specific. First, this effect was not mimicked by TAT-ß-galactosidase or by merlin without a TAT sequence. Second, this effect was both dose and time dependent. Although the mechanism by which TAT fusion proteins transduce cells is not known, TAT protein effects are concentration dependent (28). Third, the effects of TAT-merlin were reversible. Reversibility could occur if TAT-merlin inside cells becomes degraded and/or if TAT-merlin uses the TAT transporter mechanism to exit cells when the extracellular TAT-merlin concentration is lower than that inside the cells. In either case, the reversibility argues that the ruffling phenotype occurs only when TAT-merlin isoform I was present inside the cells. Finally, similar levels of TAT-merlin isoform 1 did not affect attachment or the actin cytoskeleton of normal human Schwann cells.
TAT-merlin isoform 2 did not reverse the cytoskeletal defects in schwannoma cells although the alternatively spliced NF2 mRNA is present in Schwann cells (1, 24). Similarly, only merlin isoform 1 complements growth defects in transformed cell lines (44). The merlin fusion proteins used here were tagged at their C and N termini. These tags did not compromise the ability of TAT-merlin isoform 1 protein to reverse the cytoskeletal phenotypes, in spite of evidence that missense mutations that impair merlin folding inhibit its ability to suppress growth and cell spreading (14). Our results are consistent with those of Shaw et al., who showed that a C-terminally Myc-tagged merlin isoform 1 inhibits phosphorylation of c-jun N-terminal kinase downstream of Rac as effectively as or better than untagged merlin (43). However, we cannot rule out the possibility that untagged amino and/or carboxy termini are necessary for TAT-merlin isoform 2 to function in Schwann cells.
Previous studies utilizing merlin over- and underexpression and merlin missense mutants all reported loss of cell adhesion in cell lines (13, 17, 46). Interestingly, the introduction of TAT-merlin caused a transient reduction in attachment to laminin, concomitant with decreased membrane ruffling, of schwannoma cells but not normal human Schwann cells. Cell type-specific merlin usage or relative merlin concentration could explain these varied results. TAT-merlin induced attenuation of cell-substrate interaction and of ruffling are likely related phenotypes, consistent with the view that merlin acts as a tumor suppressor by regulating cell-matrix interaction.
We conclude that merlin isoform 1 is sufficient to reverse the abnormal F-actin cytoskeletal phenotypes exhibited by NF2-deficient tumor cells. TAT-linked proteins are taken up into the nervous system (40), so in view of the specificity of TAT-merlin for schwannoma cells, it could in principle be used therapeutically. Our experiments therefore lay the foundation for epigenetic complementation studies in NF2 mouse models and for treating NF2-deficient tumors using TAT-merlin, which may, in the future, be used alone or in conjunction with other therapies.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by NIH CA 78524 to W.I. and N.R., NS35878 to M.M., and FS CA 80385 to A.-M.B.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bretscher, A., D. Chambers, R. Nguyen, and D. Reczek. 2000. ERM-Merlin and EBP50 protein families in plasma membrane organization and function. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 16:113-143.[CrossRef][Medline]
3.
Bruder, C. E., C. Hirvela, I. Tapia-Paez, I. Fransson, R. Segraves, G. Hamilton, Z. Z. Zhang, D. G. Evans, A. J. Wallace, et al. 2001. High resolution deletion analysis of constitutional DNA from neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients using microarray-CGH. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:271-282.
4. Chin, L., A. Tam, J. Pomerantz, M. Wong, J. Holash, N. Bardeesy, Q. Shen, R. O'Hagan, J. Pantginis, et al. 1999. Essential role for oncogenic Ras in tumour maintenance. Nature 400:468-472.[CrossRef][Medline]
5.
d'Ardenne, A. J., P. Kirkpatrick, and B. C. Sykes. 1984. Distribution of laminin, fibronectin, and interstitial collagen type III in soft tissue tumours. J. Clin. Pathol. 37:895-904.
6. den Bakker, M. A., P. H. Riegman, A. P. Suurmeijer, C. J. Vissers, M. Sainio, O. Carpen, and E. C. Zwarthoff. 2000. Evidence for a cytoskeleton attachment domain at the N terminus of the NF2 protein. J. Neurosci. Res. 62:764-771.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Erlandson, R. A., and J. M. Woodruff. 1982. Peripheral nerve sheath tumors: an electron microscopic study of 43 cases. Cancer 49:273-287.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Evans, D. G., L. Trueman, A. Wallace, S. Collins, and T. Strachan. 1998. Genotype/phenotype correlations in type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2): evidence for more severe disease associated with truncating mutations. J. Med. Genet. 35:450-455.[Abstract]
9. Giovannini, M., E. Robanus-Maandag, M. van der Valk, M. Niwa-Kawakita, V. Abramowski, L. Goutebroze, J. M. Woodruff, A. Berns, and G. Thomas. 2000. Conditional biallelic Nf2 mutation in the mouse promotes manifestations of human neurofibromatosis type 2. Genes Dev. 14:1617-1630.
10. Gonzalez-Agosti, C., L. Xu, D. Pinney, R. Beauchamp, W. Hobbs, J. Gusella, and V. Ramesh. 1996. The merlin tumor suppressor localizes preferentially in membrane ruffles. Oncogene 13:1239-1247.[Medline]
11. Gronholm, M., M. Sainio, F. Zhao, L. Heiska, A. Vaheri, and O. Carpen. 1999. Homotypic and heterotypic interaction of the neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor protein merlin and the ERM protein ezrin. J. Cell Sci. 112:895-904.[Abstract]
12. Gutmann, D. H., A. Aylsworth, J. C. Carey, B. Korf, J. Marks, R. E. Pyeritz, A. Rubenstein, and D. Viskochil. 1997. The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. JAMA 278:51-57.
13.
Gutmann, D. H., L. Sherman, L. Seftor, C. Haipek, K. Hoang Lu, and M. Hendrix. 1999. Increased expression of the NF2 tumor suppressor geneproduct, merlin, impairs cell motility, adhesion and spreading. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8:267-275.
14.
Gutmann, D. H., A. C. Hirbe, and C. A. Haipek. 2001. Functional analysis of neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2) missense mutations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:1519-1529.
15. Huang, L., E. Ichimaru, K. Pestonjamasp, X. Cui, H. Nakamura, G. Y. Lo, F. I. Lin, E. J. Luna, and H. Furthmayr. 1998. Merlin differs from moesin in binding to F-actin and in its intra- and intermolecular interactions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 248:548-553.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Hung, G., R. Faudoa, X. Li, Z. Xeu, D. E. Brackmann, W. Hitselberg, E. Saleh, F. Lee, D. H. Gutmann, et al. 1999. Establishment of primary vestibular schwannoma cultures from neurofibromatosis type-2 patients. Int. J. Oncol. 14:409-415.[Medline]
17. Huynth, D. P., and S. M. Pulst. 1996. Neurofibromatosis 2 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides induce reversible inhibition of schwannomin synthesis and cell adhesion in STS26T and T98G cells. Oncogene 13:73-84.[Medline]
18. Irving, R. M., T. Harada, D. A. Moffat, D. G. Hardy, J. L. Whittaker, J. H. Xuereb, and E. R. Maher. 1997. Somatic neurofibromatosis type 2 gene mutations and growth characteristics in vestibular schwannoma. Am. J. Otol. 18:754-760.[Medline]
19. Jacoby, L. B., D. Jones, K. Davis, D. Kronn, M. P. Short, J. Gusella, and M. MacCollin. 1997. Molecular analysis of the NF2 tumor-suppressor gene in schwannomatosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61:1293-1302.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Johnson, M. D., A. D. Glick, and B. W. Davis. 1988. Immunohistochemical evaluation of Leu-7, myelin basic-protein, S100-protein, glial-fibrillary acidic-protein, and LN3 immunoreactivity in nerve sheath tumors and sarcomas. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 112:155-160.[Medline]
21. Kawahara, E., Y. Oda, A. Ooi, S. Katsuda, I. Nakanishi, and S. Umeda. 1988. Expression of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 12:115-120.[Medline]
22. Maeda, M., T. Matsui, M. Imamura, S. Tsukita, and S. Tsukita. 1999. Expression level, subcellular distribution and rho-GDI binding affinity of merlin in comparison with ezrin/radixin/moesin proteins. Oncogene 18:4788-4797.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Marchionni, M. A., A. D. Goodearl, M. S. Chen, O. Bermingham-McDonogh, C. Kirk, M. Hendricks, F. Danehy, D. Misumi, J. Sudhalter, et al. 1993. Glial growth factors are alternatively spliced erbB2 ligands expressed in the nervous system. Nature 362:312-318.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Meng, J. J., D. J. Lowrie, H. Sun, E. Dorsey, P. D. Pelton, A-M. Bashour, J. Groden, N. Ratner, and W. Ip. 2000. Interaction between two isoforms of the NF2 tumor suppressor protein, merlin, and between merlin and ezrin, suggests modulation of ERM proteins by merlin. J. Neurosci. Res. 62:491-502.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Merel, P., K. Haong-Xuan, M. Sanson, A. Moreau-Aubry, E. K. Bijlsma, C. Lazaro, J. P. Moisan, F. Resche, I. Nishisho, et al. 1995. Predominant occurrence of somatic mutations of the NF2 gene in meningiomas and schwannomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 13:211-216.[Medline]
26. Mettouchi, A., S. Klein, W. Guo, M. Lopez-Lago, E. Lemichez, J. Westwick, and F. Giancotti. 2001. Integrin-specific activation of Rac controls progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Mol. Cell 8:115-127.[CrossRef][Medline]
27.
Morrison, H., L. Sherman, J. Legg, F. Banine, C. Isacke, C. A. Haipek, D. H. Gutmann, H. Ponta, and P. Herrlich. 2001. The NF2 tumor suppressor gene product, merlin, mediates contact inhibition of growth through interactions with CD44. Genes Dev. 15:968-980.
28. Nagahara, H., A. M. Vocero-Akbani, E. L. Snyder, A. Ho, D. G. Latham, N. A. Lissy, M. Becker-Hapak, S. A. Ezhevsky, and S. F. Dowdy. 1998. Transduction of full-length TAT fusion proteins into mammalian cells: TAT-p27Kip1 induces cell migration. Nat. Med. 4:1449-1452.[CrossRef][Medline]
29.
Nguyen, R., D. Reczek, and A. Bretscher. 2001. Hierarchy of merlin and ezrin N- and C-terminal domain interactions in homo- and heterotypic associations and their relationship to binding of scaffolding proteins EBP50 and E3KARP. J. Biol. Chem. 276:7621-7629.
30. Obremski, V. J., A. M. Hall, and C. Fernandez-Valle. 1998. Merlin, the neurofibromatosis type 2 gene product, and beta1 integrin associate in isolated and differentiating Schwann cells. J. Neurobiol. 37:487-501.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Parry, D. M., M. M. MacCollin, M. I. Kaiser-Kupfer, K. Pulaski, H. S. Nicholson, M. Bolesta, R. Eldridge, and J. F. Gusella. 1996. Germ-line mutations in the neurofibromatosis 2 gene: correlations with disease severity and retinal abnormalities. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 59:529-539.[Medline]
32. Pelton, P. D., T. A. Rizvi, L. Sherman, M. A. Marchionni, P. Wood, R. A. Friedman, and N. Ratner. 1998. Ruffling membrane, stress fiber, cell spreading and proliferation abnormalities in human Schwann cells. Oncogene 17:2195-2209.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Ridley, A. J., H. F. Paterson, C. L. Johnston, D. Diekmann, and A. Hall. 1992. The small GTP-binding protein Rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell 70:401-410.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Roche, P. H., D. Figarella-Branger, L. Daniel, N. Bianco, W. Pellet, and J. F. Pellissier. 1997. Expression of cell adhesion molecules in normal nerves, chronic axonal neuropathies and Schwann cell tumors. J. Neurol. Sci. 151:127-133.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Rosenbaum, C., L. Kluwe, V. F. Mautner, R. E. Friedrich, H. W. Muller, and C. O. Hanemann. 1998. Isolation and characterization of Schwann cells from neurofibromatosis type 2 patients. Neurobiol. Dis. 5:55-64.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Rouleau, G. A., P. Merel, M. Lutchman, M. Sanson, J. Zucman, C. Marineau, K. Hoang-Xuan, S. Demczuk, C. Desmaze, B. Plougastel, et al. 1993. Alteration in a new gene encoding a putative membrane-organizing protein causes neuro-fibromatosis type 2. Nature 363:515-521.
37. Ruttledge, M. H., A. A. Andermann, C. M. Phelan, J. O. Claudio, F. Y. Han, N. Chretien, S. Rangaratnam, M. MacCollin, P. Short, et al. 1996. Type of mutation in the neurofibromatosis type 2 gene (NF2) frequently determines severity of disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 59:331-342.[Medline]
38. Sainio, M., F. Zhao, L. Heiska, O. Turunen, M. den Bakker, E. Zwarthoff, M. Lutchman, G. A. Rouleau, J. Jaaskelainen, et al. 1997. Neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor protein colocalizes with ezrin and CD44 and associates with actin-containing cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci. 110:2249-2260.[Abstract]
39. Scherer, S. S., and D. H. Gutmann. 1996. Expression of the neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor gene product, merlin, in Schwann cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 46:595-605.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Schwarze, S. R., K. Hruska, and S. F. Dowdy. 2000. Protein transduction: unrestricted delivery into all cells? Trends Cell Biol. 10:290-295.[CrossRef][Medline]
41.
Shaw, R. J., M. Henry, F. Solomon, and T. Jacks. 1998. RhoA-dependent phosphorylation and relocalization of ERM proteins into apical membrane/actin protrusions in fibroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:403-419.
42. Shaw, R. J., A. I. McClatchey, and T. Jacks. 1998. Localization and functional domains of the neurofibromatosis type II tumor suppressor, merlin. Cell Growth Differ. 9:287-296.[Abstract]
43. Shaw, R. J., J. G. Paez, M. Curto, A. Yaktine, W. M. Pruit, I. Saotome, J. P. O'Brian, V. Gupta, N. Ratner, C. J. Der T. Jacks, and A. I. McClatchey. 2001. The NF2 tumor suppressor, merlin, functions in Rac-dependent signaling. Dev. Cell 1:63-72.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Sherman, L., H-M. Xu, R. T. Geist, S. Saporito-Irwin, N. Howells, P. Ponta, P. Herrlich, and D. Gutmann. 1997. Interdomain binding mediates tumor growth suppression by the NF2 gene product. Oncogene 15:2505-2509.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Stemmer-Rachamimov, A. O., L. Xu, C. Gonzalez-Agosti, J. A. Burwick, D. Pinney, R. Beauchamp, L. B. Jacoby, J. F. Gusella, V. Ramesh, et al. 1997. Universal absence of merlin, but not other ERM family members, in schwannomas. Am. J. Pathol. 151:1649-1654.[Abstract]
46. Stokowski, R. P., and D. R. Cox. 2000. Functional analysis of the neurofibromatosis type 2 protein by means of disease-causing point mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66:873-891.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Trofatter, J. A., M. M. MacCollin, J. L. Rutter, J. R. Murrell, M. P. Duyao, D. M. Parry, R. Eldridge, N. Kley, A. G. Menon, K. Pulaski, et al. 1993. A novel moesin-, ezrin-, radixin-like gene is a candidate for the neurofibromatosis 2 tumor suppressor. Cell 72:791-800.[CrossRef][Medline]
48. Xu, H-M., and D. H. Gutmann. 1998. Merlin differentially associates with the microtubule and actin cytoskeleton. J. Neurosci. Res. 51:403-415.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|