Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2002, p. 1460-1473, Vol. 22, No. 5
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.5.1460-1473.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Center for Cancer Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307
Received 22 August 2001/ Returned for modification 19 October 2001/ Accepted 28 November 2001
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies have shown that non-protein-coding transcripts from the V region promoters can be detected prior to recombination (1, 14, 59; reviewed in reference 49). These RNAs are termed sterile or germ line transcripts. Several studies have shown that expression of germ line transcripts roughly correlates with the occurrence of V-DJ recombination (24, 41, 59), suggesting a model in which germ line transcription promotes V-DJ recombination. However, other studies have shown that recombination efficiency does not always reflect promoter strength (1, 25). Most likely, a combination of promoter activity, proximity to the DJ gene segments, strength of the recombination signal sequence, and the timing and extent of chromatin opening accounts for the pattern of IgH recombination in B cells.
In isolation, VH region promoter activity is specific to cells of the lymphoid lineage, especially B lymphocytes (for recent reviews, see references 16, 28, and 33). However, the molecular basis of this selective IgH promoter expression is incompletely understood. Although several regulatory motifs, including E boxes, Ets sites, C/EBP binding sites, and pyrimidine-rich sequences have been shown to contribute to promoter activity in specific V region promoters (6, 8, 15, 45), a DNA element known as the octamer motif (5'-ATGCAAAT-3') appears to be the critical determinant of Ig promoter B-cell specificity (3, 9, 27, 29). The octamer is present in most Ig promoters (34); however, this same motif often occurs in the regulatory regions of other genes, many of which are non-B-cell specific. Examples include the regulatory regions of the U1 and U6 snRNA and histone H2B genes (30, 48). Furthermore, the known trans-acting factors that interact with the octamer element also cannot account for the B-cell specificity. Three of these factors are present in B cells: Oct-1, Oct-2, and OCA-B/Bob-1/OBF-1.
Oct-1 (47, 52, 55) is a founding member of the POU domain family of transcription factors (17) that recognizes the octamer motif and related sequences. Oct-1 is conjectured to be preferentially active at Ig promoters (36, 46), yet it is ubiquitously expressed in adult cells.
Oct-2 (5, 39, 51) is another POU domain protein capable of binding the octamer motif with similar affinity and specificity. It and the coactivator OCA-B/Bob-1/OBF-1 (13, 26, 54) have a more-B-cell-restricted expression pattern, but data from mouse knockout studies indicate that neither is required for early B-cell development and Ig transcription (7, 10, 19, 32, 43). The Oct-2/OCA-B double knockout has also been reported to produce B cells that express Ig (44). Consistent with these results, data from several laboratories indicate that physiological levels of Oct-2 and OCA-B fail to activate Ig promoters and that instead they act preferentially at the IgH intronic and 3' enhancer regions (36, 53, 57, 58).
We have used an in vivo approach in order to find and characterize additional cis regions and trans factors that mediate B-cell-specific IgH promoter transcription. In this approach, changes in IgH promoter activity were measured as changes in the amount of green fluorescent protein (GFP) produced from a cDNA linked to an IgH promoter (17.2.25; see Materials and Methods). Cells with increased GFP activity were monitored, enriched, and isolated using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).
During the course of these experiments, we observed that one murine pre-T-cell line, 2017 (50), could be selected to have levels of GFP that are 100-fold higher than the baseline. Several clones from this high-GFP population have been isolated and further characterized. We also report the delineation of a new cis-acting element downstream of the transcription initiation site in IgH promoters and the promoters of several other B-cell-specific genes.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 (12) was used as a PCR template with PCR primers containing restriction enzyme sites on their 5' ends. pµ
1 PCR products were digested with BglII and HindIII, gel purified, and ligated into the pGL3 backbone using T4 DNA ligase (Life Technologies). The full-length IgH promoter corresponded to residues from -154 to +35 relative to the transcription initiation site. The sequence of the IgH-154Bgl 5" primer used to amplify the promoter sequences was 5"-GGAGATCTGGATCCAGAGTTNGG-3'. The sequences of the 3" primers were as follows: IgH + 35Hind, 5"-GGAAGCTTGAGATTCAGTGTCT-3"; and IgH + 1Hind, 5"-GGAACGTTATGATGTTTGGTGTG-3". For the H2B promoter constructs, two oligonucleotides containing sequences from the human H2B promoter (48) were synthesized with phosphate groups on their 5" ends. The oligonucleotides were as follows: H2B-595"Bgl, 5"-GATCTTCTTCACCTTATTTGCATAAGCGATTCTATATAAAAGCGCCTTGTCATACCCTACTCACGA-3"; and H2B-593"Hind, 5"-AGCTTCGTGAGTAGGGTATGACAAGGCGCTTTTATATAGAATCGCTTATGCAAATAAGGTGAAGAA-3". The oligonucleotides were annealed together, creating a double-stranded molecule with BglII- and HindIII-compatible ends, and ligated directly into pGL3. The final portion of the H2B promoter incorporated into the luciferase construct spanned sequences from -59 to +1 relative to the transcription initiation site. The IgH-154 + 35 construct with the Eµ intronic enhancer was made by inserting a 700-bp enhancer sequence from the EVH186.2 construct (a gift of F. Alt) into a distal pGL3 XbaI site located approximately 2 kb upstream of the promoter sequence. The IgH-154 + 1/186.2 chimeric promoter was made by inserting a double-stranded oligonucleotide with HindIII overhangs and 5" phosphate groups into the HindIII site of the IgH-154 + 1 construct. The sequences of the oligonucleotides were as follows: 186.2HinTOP, 5"-AGCTTGATCACTGTTCTCTTTACAGTTACTGAGCACACAGGA-3"; and 186.2HinBOT, 5"-AGCTTCCTGTGTGCTCAGTAACTGTAAAGAGAACAGTGATCA-3". The sequence and orientation of the insert were confirmed by DNA sequencing and PCR.
Construction of the scanning promoter mutagenesis constructs utilized the EcoRV site located at -21 relative to the transcription initiation site in the 17.2.25 promoter. The full-length -154 to +35 luciferase construct was digested with EcoRV and HindIII, treated with alkaline phosphatase (Life Technologies), and gel purified. Oligonucleotides (73-mer) containing the promoter sequence between the EcoRV and HindIII sites and containing 3-bp mutations were amplified by seven rounds of PCR using Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer) and primers homologous to the 5' and 3' ends. The mutations were A
C, G
T, C
A, and T
G. As an example, the sequence of the oligonucleotide IgMut-15 was 5"-CGCAGCGATATCACAACCAAACATCATATGAGCCCTATCTTCTCTACAGACACTGAATCTCAAGCTTCGAGCC-3". The letters in bold indicate the positions of the mutation. The EcoRV and HindIII sites are underlined. The PCR primers were 5"-AGCCGCAGCGATATC-3" and 5"-AGCGGCTCGAAGCTT-3". The products were digested with EcoRV and HindIII and ligated into the digested -154 to +35 construct.
For GFP constructs, the pEGFP-1 plasmid (Clontech) was digested with BglII and HindIII, treated with alkaline phosphatase, and gel purified. The luciferase construct (-154 to +35) was digested with BglII and HindIII, gel purified, and ligated into the pEGFP-1 backbone creating the plasmid pEGFP-IgH-154 + 35.
Cell culture, transfections, and stable cell lines.
The cell lines 2017, BJA-B, M12, 70Z/3, and WERI-27 were grown in RPMI with HEPES (Life Technologies) plus 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (IFS) (HyClone), 2 mM L-glutamine, 50 U of penicillin-streptomycin/ml, and 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol. EL-4, p5424, and
4b were grown in Dulbeccos modified Eagle medium with HEPES (Life Technologies), 10% IFS, L-glutamine, penicillin-streptomycin, and 2-mercaptoethanol. When transfections were performed using electroporation, 2 x 106 subconfluent cells were harvested and resuspended in 400 µl of the appropriate medium without IFS. Ten micrograms of total DNA was added (typically 2 µg of luciferase reporter, 2 µg of pCMV-ßGal, and 6 µg of pUC18 DNA), and the reaction mixtures were incubated on ice for 10 min. Cells were electroporated with a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser set at 260 V, 960 µF, and 200
and with cuvettes with a gap length of 4 mm. After a further 10-min incubation on ice, the cells were plated in 10-cm-diameter dishes with 10 ml of complete medium. Cells were harvested and assayed after 24 h. Lipid-mediated transfection experiments used the FuGene6 transfection reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total DNA (2.5 µg) (typically 500 ng each of the luciferase construct and pCMV-ßGal and 1.5 µg of pUC18 DNA) were combined with 7.5 µl of transfection reagent in 200 µl of serum-free medium, and applied to 106 cells in six-well plates containing 3 ml of complete medium in each well. Cells were assayed after 24 h.
For the construction of stable cell lines harboring the Ig-GFP reporter, 10 µg of the plasmid pEGFP-IgH-154 + 35 was electroporated into 8 x 106 2017 cells. After 24 h, the cells were placed in 0.75 mg of active G418 (Life Technologies)/ml, diluted, and aliquoted into 20 96-well plates. Approximately 1 in 25 wells showed growth in G418. Viable clones were expanded and analyzed by flow cytometry. This protocol yielded approximately 80 founder clones per transfection.
FACS. Flow cytometry used Becton Dickinson FACScan and FACSCalibur machines. For cell sorting, the Becton Dickinson FACSVantage high-speed cell sorter was used. All analyses used CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson).
Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The Superscript system (Life Technologies) was used. Total RNA was prepared from 5 ml of subconfluent cells using RNAzol (Teltest). GFP-specific primers were as follows: GFP-1, 5'-TGAACCGCATCGAGCTGAAGGG-3'; GFP-2, 5"-TCCAGCAGGACCATGTGATCGC-3". V region-specific primers were as follows: J5585"L, 5"-TCCTCCTGTCAGTAACTGCAG-3"; J5583"FWIII, 5"-ATGATGGCAGTGCTGGAGGAT-3". For the GFP analysis, reactions were amplified for 24 cycles in an MJ Research PTC 100 thermal cycler. For the V region analysis, reactions were amplified for 39 cycles. After 28 cycles, parallel reaction mixtures containing actin primers (Ambion) were removed to retain the actin amplification in the linear range.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
4b, P5424, and 2017). The murine T-cell line EL-4, which has been reported to have high IgH promoter activity (36) was the sole exception. Comparing pre-B (70Z/3), mature B (M12), and activated plasma cell lines (BJA-B), we also noted an increase in promoter activity with the full-length promoter construct. These studies indicated the presence of a potential regulatory element located downstream of the transcription initiation site, as removal of the sequences downstream of +1 resulted in an approximately fourfold down-regulation of promoter activity (Fig. 2A). The deletion appeared to have a greater effect on cell lines derived from more mature B cells, such as BJA-B and M12, than with earlier stage B-cell lines such as 70Z.
|
To test whether the downstream sequence determinants can be complemented by sequences from another IgH promoter, a chimeric construct was made in which sequences from the VH 186.2 promoter (see Fig. 8 and reference 20) were placed immediately downstream of the IgH-154 + 1 construct. The final construct contained sequences from the 17.2.25 promoter to +1, a six-nucleotide HindIII site, and the sequence from the 186.2 promoter downstream of the transcription start site from +6 to +42. As shown in Fig. 2C, transient transfection of this construct into BJA-B cells restored full promoter activity.
|
Selection of clones for high IgH promoter-GFP expression. The above findings were reproduced when GFP was used in place of luciferase in transient transfection assays (data not shown). Therefore, stable 2017 cell lines were constructed in which the -154 + 35 IgH promoter was linked to GFP. The stable cell lines were single-cell cloned and designated 2017-Ig-GFP. Clone no. 9 had modest GFP activity and was used in these experiments. This clone significantly up-regulates GFP activity upon polyethylene glycol-mediated fusion with the B-cell line M12 (not shown), indicating that it is poised to strongly express the stably transfected IgH promoter if trans-acting factors present in B cells are supplied. Omitting either polyethylene glycol or the M12 cell line from the fusion mixture eliminated the up-regulation.
Using multiple rounds of FACS, rare 2017-IgH-GFP no. 9 cells were selected that expressed GFP more strongly than the parental cell type. Upon selection, cells appeared that expressed GFP 10- to 100-fold more than the parental population (Fig. 3A). Another 2017-IgH-GFP clone could be similarly selected, indicating that the ability to up-regulate the IgH promoter is intrinsic to the 2017 cell line and not the individual clone used. In contrast, a similarly engineered B-cell line could not be selected, even after multiple rounds of FACS (data not shown). Individual clones from the high-GFP population were designated 2017-IgH-GFP no. 9 m or h depending on the level of GFP expression gated in the final round of sorting (Fig. 3A). Several single-cell clones derived from this high-GFP population were isolated and analyzed in detail. The cells had a clumped appearance (Fig. 3D and E) and slightly lower growth rates (data not shown). Western blotting revealed no change in the expression of Oct-1, Oct-2, or OCA-B among these cell lines (data not shown). The GFP activity of these cell lines was stable, as they retained their characteristics even after 4 months in continuous culture. However, upon reselection with several rounds of FACS for a low-GFP phenotype, a stable low-GFP population can reemerge (data not shown).
|
|
/CD79a (-252 to +48) (gifts of R. Wall; for sequences, see Fig. 8) were up-regulated relative to the parental cell type (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the activity of the pre-T-cell receptor
promoter (a gift of B. Reizis) remained the same in all tested cell lines, suggesting that the increased activity is confined to B-cell-specific promoters (data not shown). These data indicate that multiple B-cell-specific promoters exhibit higher activity in the selected cell lines.
|
The IgH intronic enhancer appeared to remain largely inactive in the selected cell lines, as the ratio of activity of EVH186.2 to IgH-154 + 35 was approximately the same as that of the parental line (Fig. 5B). In contrast, the B-cell line 70Z/3 showed a dramatic increase in reporter activity when the construct with the enhancer was used. To more directly test this idea, we inserted the Eµ sequence from EVH186.2 into the IgH-154 + 35 construct by using a distal XbaI site (see Materials and Methods) and transfected this construct into the parental and selected 2017 cell lines. In this configuration, we observed a substantial increase in luciferase activity with the enhancer in 70Z/3 B cells, but a much more modest increase in activity with the parental 2017-IgH-GFP no. 9 cell line. While we observed an increase in reporter activity in two selected cell lines with both constructs, we did not observe any further up-regulation in the presence of the enhancer (Fig. 5C). We conclude that the high-GFP 2017 cell lines have been altered in a manner that potentiates the activity of multiple IgH promoters, but IgH intronic enhancer activity is not augmented.
To determine which regions of the IgH 17.2.25 promoter were necessary for the up-regulation in the selected cell lines, constructs lacking either the downstream regions or the octamer motif were tested in transient transfection assays. Among the constructs used, only those that lacked the sequences downstream of the transcription initiation site eliminated the higher promoter activity in the selected high-GFP clones relative to the parental cell type (data not shown). Scanning promoter mutants were used in the selected cell lines to determine which regions were important for the up-regulation (Fig. 5D). Mutations in +16, +17, and +18 and mutations in +19, +20, and +21 largely eliminated the increased promoter activity seen in the selected cells, indicating that this region was critical for the up-regulation. The mutant promoter constructs still retained significant activity over the backbone plasmid (not shown). Thus, the downstream sequences are a likely targets of the factor(s) mediating the up-regulation of promoter activity in the selected high-GFP cells.
High-density gene arrays were used to compare the mRNA expression profiles of the parental and two selected cell lines (m6 and h3), resulting in a list of 70 genes and expressed sequence tags whose expression coordinately changed by twofold or more (unpublished data). Notably absent from the list of genes with altered expression (but present on the array) were Oct-1, Oct-2, and OCA-B. Two up-regulated genes, as measured by the gene chip, were CD53 and L-selectin/MEL-14. We used commercial antibodies to stain for surface CD53 and L-selectin and analyzed the degree of expression using flow cytometry (Fig. 6). CD53 was significantly up-regulated in the selected cell line m6 compared to the 2017-IgH-GFP no. 9 parental cell line (compare Fig. 6B with 6A). L-selectin was up-regulated to a lesser extent, and in this case 2017-IgH-GFP no. 9 had a higher degree of baseline expression (compare Fig. 6F to 6E). Increased nonspecific binding of the secondary antibodies could be excluded as a factor in these results, as omitting the primary antibody eliminated the signal (Fig. 6C, D, G, and H). The GFP fluorescences of 2017-IgH-GFP no. 9 (Fig. 6I) and clone 6 (Fig. 6J) are also shown. These data suggest that the selected cell lines display an altered transcriptional profile compared to the parental cell line.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-41 light chain promoter using deletion and mutagenesis. They also have found that sequences near and downstream of the transcription initiation site are important for strong promoter activity as assayed by in vitro transcription (Fig. 8). Thus, analysis of two Ig promoters by using two different assay systems indicates that elements downstream of the transcription initiation site are important for controlling expression.
We have used an in vivo T-cell IgH transcription model to help elucidate new elements mediating high levels of IgH promoter expression. In this approach, 2017 cells carrying a 190-bp IgH promoter upstream of GFP were selected for high activity. This method was preferable to scoring the endogenous Ig locus because (i) the GFP activity was simple to assay and (ii) the protocol selects for higher activity of a relatively small promoter region rather than the megabase-scale endogenous IgH locus. The murine pre-T-cell line 2017 can autonomously modulate the activity of stable transfected IgH promoters, as no stimulus was given to the cells prior to sorting. In the first round of sorting, the top
0.1% of cells were selected. Expanding this population and assaying the cells in a second round, we observed that approximately 4% of the cells sorted into a high-GFP window. Assuming slightly slower growth for the high-GFP cells, we estimate that 1 in 20,000 cells carries the high-GFP phenotype in the original population. Although the emergence of the high-GFP variants was spontaneous, the activity was stable even after long periods of culture. Other reports have documented the ability of T-cell lines to intrinsically modulate the expression of certain genes. For example, the cell line EL-4 can spontaneously turn on or off the expression of NK-related surface markers and other markers such as CD4 and CD44 (11). In some cases, the changes were coordinate, as for example CD2 and CD3 would only change together.
The transfected 17.2.25 IgH promoter was more active in the selected cell lines. Scanning promoter mutagenesis experiments pinpointed the same region downstream of the transcription start site that was important for optimal B-cell expression in the up-regulation of promoter activity in the selected cells. This effect was investigated further by examining other promoters. In addition to two IgH promoters representing different VH family members (17.2.25 is a VH 81X/7183 family member and VH 186.2 is a member of the major J558 class), two other B-cell-specific promotersB29 and mb-1have increased activity in the selected cell lines relative to the parental cell lines and to the histone H2B promoter. In contrast, the pre-T-cell receptor
promoter remained equally active (not shown).
The difference between the levels of expression of the immunoglobulin promoters in the selected clones versus the parental cell lines strongly indicates that the activities of specific transcription factors are different in the two populations. However, the degree of up-regulation of the transiently transfected 17.2.25 IgH promoter in the selected cell lines (3- to 5-fold) was much less than the degree of up-regulation of the integrated promoter upstream of GFP (10- to 100-fold). This difference in the degree of transcriptional activation could be explained by differences in the chromatin state of the integrated and transiently transfected plasmids.
A simple explanation for the increase in expression of the IgH promoter in the selected cells would be that a rare event changed the methylation state or chromatin structure of the stable transfected reporter. Several points argue against such a local mechanism. First, multiple different stable transfected clones of 2017-IgH-GFP can be selected to have high GFP activity, indicating that the position(s) of integration does not affect the up-regulation of the IgH promoter. Second, this same promoter and other B-cell-specific promoters are up-regulated in the high-GFP cell lines when transiently transfected. In the case of the 17.2.25 IgH promoter, the up-regulation is sensitive to particular point mutations in transient transfection assays. Third, the endogenous IgH locus has apparently become activated in the selected cell lines (see below), suggesting a common function of specific trans factors at different chromosomal locations. Fourth, a gene chip indicates that a number of genes have an altered expression in the selected cell lines (Fig. 6 and unpublished data).
Interestingly, the 17.2.25 and 186.2 IgH promoters, and the B29 and mb-1 promoters, all contain pyrimidine-rich sequences near their transcription initiation sites. Specific mutations in the 17.2.25 sequence decreased promoter activity. Linker scanner mutations in the
-41 light chain promoter near and downstream of the transcription initiation site also compromise promoter activity (Hardy and Grosschedl, personal communication). Aligning these two promoter sequences resulted in no significant overall homology. However, the highest scoring alignments corresponded to the areas identified in the different screens (data not shown). This finding indicates that the two sequence elements may be functionally related.
We examined several other promoters from both the heavy and light chain V region genes of both mice and humans for similar sequences (Fig. 8). Many of these sequences contain obvious pyrimidine-rich sequences, typically downstream of the transcription initiation site. Although we chose promoters with minimal overall similarity to one another, all Ig V regions presumably derived from genetic duplication of an ancestral prototype, and thus aligning these promoters may highlight identity by descent. However, a Gibbs sampling algorithm (22) designed to detect conserved motifs distributed within a set of sequences produced a 14-nucleotide consensus when provided with the sequences shown in Fig. 8. The consensus is shown at the bottom of Fig. 8, and the top 25 perfect and near matches to the consensus (all of which are 9 of 14 nucleotides or better) are boxed. When the nucleotide sequences were scrambled, the algorithm did not produce a meaningful consensus. The derived sequence appears to consist of two half sites, one that is T/G rich and one that is A/C rich, with a pyrimidine-rich sequence in between them. Importantly, the nucleotide residues implicated in promoter expression by mutational analysis in the 17.2.25 heavy chain and
-41 light chain promoters (Fig. 8) overlapped with consensus sequences. We propose that factors recognizing this consensus sequence mediate higher promoter activity in B cells and in the selected T-cell lines. The biological significance of these sequences is buttressed by the finding that downstream nucleotides from the 186.2 promoter, containing the two boxed elements shown in Fig. 8, can restore full promoter activity to the -154 to +1 segment of the 17.2.25 promoter.
The endogenous IgH locus became activated in several of the selected cell lines, as RT-PCR showed the presence of spliced J558 V region transcripts. Although it is formally possible that the transcripts are derived from a recombined mature IgH mRNA, it is unlikely given the lack of activation of the IgH intronic enhancer in the selected cell lines and the lack of activation of constant region genes present on a murine 11,000-molecular-weight gene chip (11K gene chip). We have also been unable to detect IgH recombination in DNA prepared from the selected cell lines by PCR (data not shown). More likely, these RT-PCR products represent germ line transcripts. Stable expression of the Ig intronic enhancer-binding transcription factor E47 in 2017 has been shown to activate limited recombination and sterile transcription of the D-J regions, but not the V regions, of the IgH locus (42). Therefore, high-GFP selection of a 2017-IgH-GFP cell line expressing E47 could initiate IgH production. Such a system would provide an experimental platform by which to study factors that activate the IgH locus in a T-cell line.
The octamer motif was originally identified through its high conservation in Ig promoters (9, 34). Subsequently, the octamer was found in other non-B-cell-specific genes, appearing to rule it out as a specificity element. The description of B-cell-specific complexes forming on octamer elements, later shown to be due to Oct-2 (21, 40, 47, 52), rekindled the debate over octamer specificity. More recently, B cells derived from Oct-2 homozygous null mice were shown to be capable of expressing Ig. The coactivator OCA-B was also shown to be dispensable (19, 32, 43).
One explanation for these results is that an as yet unidentified cofactor mediates B-cell specificity through the octamer, possibly in conjunction with the ubiquitous factor Oct-1. Another possibility is that the octamer motif is not the sole mediator of Ig promoter activity or B-cell specificity. There is ample evidence to support this idea. A number of Ig heavy and light chain V region promoters lack consensus octamer sites and do not interact with Oct proteins in vitro but are nevertheless efficiently expressed (2). In one such promoter, activity was shown to be mediated by a pyrimidine-rich element termed
Y. Eaton and Calame also noted the presence of a pyrimidine-rich region in many Ig promoters, in this case upstream of the octamer and heptamer motifs (8). In their study, mutation of this element was as deleterious to the activity of the promoter as point mutation of the octamer. A similar sequence occurs upstream of the octamer in the 17.2.25 promoter used in these studies (centered at -105). Roeder and colleagues have used chimeric constructs containing portions of an IgH and the H2B promoter. Their data indicate that the determinants of promoter specificity lie not with the octamer sequence but with the core promoter (R. Roeder, personal communication). In support of this idea, we have found that nuclear extracts prepared from the selected high-GFP 2017 cells show an increased ability to form a specific nucleoprotein complex at the IgH core promoter relative to extracts from the unselected cell line (D. Tantin and P. A. Sharp, unpublished data).
Proteins that interact with promoter DNA proximal to and downstream of the transcription initiation site have been described previously. TFIID, for example, forms an extended footprint containing multiple downstream DNA contacts to approximately +35 on the adenovirus major late promoter (31). These contacts are especially important for promoter activity in the case of promoters with nonconsensus TATA regions (as with the IgH promoter), and they can be sequence specific (18). More recently, sequence-specific downstream promoter elements have been described for Drosophila and mammals (4). Current work is aimed at determining the nature of the factors that interact with these new Ig promoter elements.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
D.T. was supported by a fellowship from the Irvington Institute for Immunological Research. This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant PO1-CA42063 to P.A.S. and partially supported by Cancer Center Support (core) grant P30-CA14051 from the National Institutes of Health.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Atchison, M. L., V. Delmas, and R. P. Perry. 1990. A novel upstream element compensates for an ineffectual octamer motif in an immunoglobulin V kappa promoter. EMBO J. 9:3109-3117.[Medline]
3.
Ballard, D. W., and A. Bothwell. 1986. Mutational analysis of the immunoglobulin heavy chain promoter region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:9626-9630.
4.
Burke, T. W., and J. T. Kadonaga. 1997. The downstream core promoter element, DPE, is conserved from Drosophila to humans and is recognized by TAFII60 of Drosophila. Genes Dev. 11:3020-3031.
5.
Clerc, R. G., L. M. Corcoran, J. H. LeBowitz, D. Baltimore, and P. A. Sharp. 1988. The B-cell-specific Oct-2 protein contains POU box- and homeo box-type domains. Genes Dev. 2:1570-1581.
6. Cooper, C., D. Johnson, C. Roman, N. Avitahl, P. Tucker, and K. Calame. 1992. The C/EBP family of transcriptional activators is functionally important for Ig VH promoter activity in vivo and in vitro. J. Immunol. 149:3225-3231.[Abstract]
7.
Corcoran, L. M., M. Karvelas, G. J. Nossal, Z. S. Ye, T. Jacks, and D. Baltimore. 1993. Oct-2, although not required for early B-cell development, is critical for later B-cell maturation and for postnatal survival. Genes Dev. 7:570-582.
8.
Eaton, S., and K. Calame. 1987. Multiple DNA sequence elements are necessary for the function of an immunoglobulin heavy chain promoter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7634-7638.
9. Falkner, F. G., and H. G. Zachau. 1984. Correct transcription of an immunoglobulin kappa gene requires an upstream fragment containing conserved sequence elements. Nature 310:71-74.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Feldhaus, A. L., C. A. Klug, K. L. Arvin, and H. Singh. 1993. Targeted disruption of the Oct-2 locus in a B cell provides genetic evidence for two distinct cell type-specific pathways of octamer element-mediated gene activation. EMBO J. 12:2763-2772.[Medline]
11.
Gays, F., M. Unnikrishnan, S. Shrestha, K. P. Fraser, A. R. Brown, C. M. Tristram, Z. M. Chrzanowska-Lightowlers, and C. G. Brooks. 2000. The mouse tumor cell lines EL4 and RMA display mosaic expression of NK-related and certain other surface molecules and appear to have a common origin. J. Immunol. 164:5094-5102.
12. Grosschedl, R., and D. Baltimore. 1985. Cell-type specificity of immunoglobulin gene expression is regulated by at least three DNA sequence elements. Cell 41:885-897.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Gstaiger, M., L. Knoepfel, O. Georgiev, W. Schaffner, and C. M. Hovens. 1995. A B-cell coactivator of octamer-binding transcription factors. Nature 373:360-362.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Haines, B. B., and P. H. Brodeur. 1998. Accessibility changes across the mouse Igh-V locus during B cell development. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:4228-4235.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Hatada, E. N., S. Chen-Kiang, and C. Scheidereit. 2000. Interaction and functional interference of C/EBPbeta with octamer factors in immunoglobulin gene transcription. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:174-184.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Henderson, A., and K. Calame. 1998. Transcriptional regulation during B cell development. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:163-200.[CrossRef][Medline]
17.
Herr, W., R. A. Sturm, R. G. Clerc, L. M. Corcoran, D. Baltimore, P. A. Sharp, H. A. Ingraham, M. G. Rosenfeld, M. Finney, G. Ruvkin, et al. 1988. The POU domain: a large conserved region in the mammalian pit-1, oct-1, oct-2, and Caenorhabditis elegans unc-86 gene products. Genes Dev. 2:1513-1516.
18.
Kaufmann, J., and S. T. Smale. 1994. Direct recognition of initiator elements by a component of the transcription factor IID complex. Genes Dev. 8:821-829.
19. Kim, U., X. F. Qin, S. Gong, S. Stevens, Y. Luo, M. Nussensweig, and R. G. Roeder. 1996. The B-cell-specific transcription coactivator OCA-B/OBF-1/Bob-1 is essential for normal production of immunoglobulin isotypes. Nature 383:542-547.[CrossRef][Medline]
20.
Krawinkel, U., G. Zoebelein, and A. L. Bothwell. 1986. Palindromic sequences are associated with sites of DNA breakage during gene conversion. Nucleic Acids Res. 14:3871-3882.
21. Landolfi, N. F., J. D. Capra, and P. W. Tucker. 1986. Interaction of cell-type-specific nuclear proteins with immunoglobulin VH promoter region sequences. Nature 323:548-551.[CrossRef][Medline]
22.
Lawrence, C. E., S. F. Altschul, M. S. Boguski, J. S. Liu, A. F. Neuwald, and J. C. Wootton. 1993. Detecting subtle sequence signals: a Gibbs sampling strategy for multiple alignment. Science 262:208-214.
23.
LeBowitz, J. H., R. G. Clerc, M. Brenowitz, and P. A. Sharp. 1989. The Oct-2 protein binds cooperatively to adjacent octamer sites. Genes Dev. 3:1625-1638.
24. Lennon, G. G., and R. P. Perry. 1990. The temporal order of appearance of transcripts from unrearranged and rearranged Ig genes in murine fetal liver. J. Immunol. 144:1983-1987.[Abstract]
25. Love, V. A., G. Lugo, D. Merz, and A. J. Feeney. 2000. Individual V(H) promoters vary in strength, but the frequency of rearrangement of those V(H) genes does not correlate with promoter strength nor enhancer-independence. Mol. Immunol. 37:29-39.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Luo, Y., and R. G. Roeder. 1995. Cloning, functional characterization, and mechanism of action of the B-cell-specific transcriptional coactivator OCA-B. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4115-4124.[Abstract]
27. Mason, J. O., G. T. Williams, and M. S. Neuberger. 1985. Transcription cell type specificity is conferred by an immunoglobulin VH gene promoter that includes a functional consensus sequence. Cell 41:479-487.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Matthias, P. 1998. Lymphoid-specific transcription mediated by the conserved octamer site: who is doing what? Semin. Immunol. 10:155-163.[CrossRef][Medline]
29.
Mizushima-Sugano, J., and R. G. Roeder. 1986. Cell-type-specific transcription of an immunoglobulin kappa light chain gene in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:8511-8515.
30. Murphy, J. T., R. R. Burgess, J. E. Dahlberg, and E. Lund. 1982. Transcription of a gene for human U1 small nuclear RNA. Cell 29:265-274.[CrossRef][Medline]
31.
Nakajima, N., M. Horikoshi, and R. G. Roeder. 1988. Factors involved in specific transcription by mammalian RNA polymerase II: purification, genetic specificity, and TATA box-promoter interactions of TFIID. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:4028-4040.
32. Nielson, P. J., O. Georgiev, B. Lorentz, and W. Schaffner. 1996. B lymphocytes are impaired in mice lacking the transcriptional co-activator Bob1/OCA-B/OBF1. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:3214-3218.[Medline]
33. O'Riordan, M., and R. Grosschedl. 2000. Transcriptional regulation during B cell development. Immunol. Rev. 175:94-103.[CrossRef][Medline]
34.
Parslow, T. G., D. L. Blair, W. J. Murphy, and D. K. Granner. 1984. Structure of the 5' ends of immunoglobulin genes: a novel conserved sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:2650-2654.
35.
Parvin, J. D., and P. A. Sharp. 1991. Identification of novel factors which bind specifically to the core promoter of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene. J. Biol. Chem. 266:22878-22886.
36. Pfisterer, P., A. Annweiler, C. Ullmer, L. M. Corcoran, and T. Wirth. 1994. Differential transactivation potential of Oct1 and Oct2 is determined by additional B cell-specific activities. EMBO J. 13:1655-1663.[Medline]
37.
Poellinger, L., and R. G. Roeder. 1989. Octamer transcription factors 1 and 2 each bind to two different functional elements in the immunoglobulin heavy-chain promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:747-756.
38. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
39. Scheidereit, C., J. A. Cromlish, T. Gerster, K. Kawakami, C. G. Balmaceda, R. A. Currie, and R. G. Roeder. 1988. A human lymphoid-specific transcription factor that activates immunoglobulin genes is a homeobox protein. Nature 336:551-557.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Scheidereit, C., A. Heguy, and R. G. Roeder. 1987. Identification and purification of a human lymphoid-specific octamer-binding protein (OTF-2) that activates transcription of an immunoglobulin promoter in vitro. Cell 51:783-793.[CrossRef][Medline]
41.
Schlissel, M. S., L. M. Corcoran, and D. Baltimore. 1991. Virus-transformed pre-B cells show ordered activation but not inactivation of immunoglobulin gene rearrangement and transcription. J. Exp. Med. 173:711-720.
42.
Schlissel, M. S., A. Voronova, and D. Baltimore. 1991. Helix-loop-helix transcription factor E47 activates germ-line immunoglobulin transcription and rearrangement in a pre-T cell line. Genes Dev. 5:1367-1376.
43. Schubart, D. B., A. Rolink, R. G. Kosco-Vilbois, F. Botteri, and P. Matthias. 1996. B-cell-specific coactivator OBF-1/OCA-B/Bob1 required for immune response and germinal centre formation. Nature 383:538-542.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Schubart, K., S. Massa, D. Schubart, L. M. Corcoran, A. G. Rolink, and P. Matthias. 2001. B cell development and immunoglobulin gene transcription in the absence of Oct-2 and OBF-1. Nat. Immunol. 2:69-74.[CrossRef][Medline]
45.
Schwarzenbach, H., J. W. Newell, and P. Matthias. 1995. Involvement of the Ets family factor PU.1 in the activation of immunoglobulin promoters. J. Biol. Chem. 270:898-907.
46. Shah, P. C., E. Bertolino, and H. Singh. 1997. Using altered specificity Oct-1 and Oct-2 mutants to analyze the regulation of immunoglobulin gene transcription. EMBO J. 16:7105-7117.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Singh, H., R. Sen, D. Baltimore, and P. A. Sharp. 1986. A nuclear factor that binds to a conserved sequence motif in transcriptional control elements of immunoglobulin genes. Nature 319:154-158.[CrossRef][Medline]
48.
Sive, H. L., N. Heintz, and R. G. Roeder. 1986. Multiple sequence elements are required for maximal in vitro transcription of a human histone H2B gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3329-3340.
49. Sleckman, B. P., J. R. Gorman, and F. W. Alt. 1996. Accessibility control of antigen-receptor variable-region gene assembly: role of cis-acting elements. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:459-481.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Spolski, R., G. Miescher, F. Erard, R. Risser, H. R. MacDonald, and T. W. Mak. 1988. Regulation of expression of T cell gamma chain L3T4 and Ly-2 messages in Abelson/Moloney virus-transformed T cell lines. Eur. J. Immunol. 18:295-300.[Medline]
51.
Staudt, L. M., R. G. Clerc, H. Singh, J. H. LeBowitz, P. A. Sharp, and D. Baltimore. 1988. Cloning of a lymphoid-specific cDNA encoding a protein binding the regulatory octamer DNA motif. Science 241:577-580.
52. Staudt, L. M., H. Singh, R. Sen, T. Wirth, P. A. Sharp, and D. Baltimore. 1986. A lymphoid-specific protein binding to the octamer motif of immunoglobulin genes. Nature 323:640-643.[CrossRef][Medline]
53.
Stevens, S., J. Ong, U. Kim, L. A. Eckhardt, and R. G. Roeder. 2000. Role of OCA-B in 3'-IgH enhancer function. J. Immunol. 164:5306-5312.
54. Strubin, M., J. W. Newell, and P. Matthias. 1995. OBF-1, a novel B cell-specific coactivator that stimulates immunoglobulin promoter activity through association with octamer-binding proteins. Cell 80:497-506.[CrossRef][Medline]
55.
Sturm, R. A., G. Das, and W. Herr. 1988. The ubiquitous octamer-binding protein Oct-1 contains a POU domain with a homeobox subdomain. Genes Dev. 2:1582-1599.
56. Tanaka, M., J. S. Lai, and W. Herr. 1992. Promoter-selective activation domains in Oct-1 and Oct-2 direct differential activation of an snRNA and mRNA promoter. Cell 68:755-767.[CrossRef][Medline]
57. Tang, H., and P. A. Sharp. 1999. Transcriptional regulation of the murine 3' IgH enhancer by OCT-2. Immunity 11:517-526.[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Tomilin, A., A. Remenyi, K. Lins, H. Bak, S. Leidel, G. Vriend, M. Wilmanns, and H. R. Scholer. 2000. Synergism with the coactivator OBF-1 (OCA-B, BOB-1) is mediated by a specific POU dimer configuration. Cell 103:853-864.[CrossRef][Medline]
59. Yancopoulos, G. D., and F. W. Alt. 1985. Developmentally controlled and tissue-specific expression of unrearranged VH gene segments. Cell 40:271-281.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||