Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2002, p. 2242-2254, Vol. 22, No. 7
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.7.2242-2254.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,1 Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics,5 Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030,4 Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Oxford OX1 3QU, Great Britain,2 Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191113
Received 30 October 2001/ Returned for modification 11 December 2001/ Accepted 19 December 2001
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rb functions, in part, to regulate E2F transcriptional activity. E2F transcription factors are composed of a DNA binding DP subunit and one of five E2F family members. Association of Rb with E2F1 to E2F4 leads to inhibition of E2F transcriptional activity either by blocking the E2F transactivation domain or by active repression via recruitment of histone deacetylase (19, 23). Phosphorylation of Rb by Cdks is thought to result in the release of Rb and its associated chromatin remodeling enzymes from E2F, thereby facilitating transcriptional activation of numerous target genes (49).
p107 and p130 are members of the Rb family of proteins and contain two domains, the A and B pockets, which are responsible for binding to transforming oncogenes such as E1A. Like Rb, p107 and p130 block transcription of E2F-regulated genes but function exclusively through interactions with E2F4 and E2F5 (19, 39). Analysis of mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking either p107/p130 or Rb indicate that p107/p130 and Rb regulate the expression of different sets of E2F-responsive genes (28). Until recently, it was thought that the major, if not exclusive substrate of cyclin D1/Cdk4 was Rb (40, 45). However, the finding that mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking p107/p130 or E2F4/E2F5 are insensitive to growth arrest by p16 expression challenges this view (11, 20). These observations indicate that Rb family members function combinatorially to control cell cycle transitions (16, 53) and that cyclin D1/Cdk4 may participate in the functional inactivation of all three family members. In fact, earlier biochemical studies had placed cyclin D1/Cdk4 upstream of p107 inactivation: p107 becomes hyperphosphorylated as cells traverse the G1/S-phase transition and ectopic expression of cyclin D1/Cdk4 induces p107 hyperphosphorylation, as well as inactivation of its growth-suppressive and E2F-binding activities (7, 63). However, these experiments did not address whether the effects of cyclin D/Cdk4 on p107 were direct or reflect CKI sequestration and Cdk2 activation.
Other lines of evidence suggest a role for cyclin A and E/Cdk2 in the regulation of p107. In contrast to D-type cyclins, cyclins E and A/Cdk2 form stable complexes with p107 during late-G1 and S phases (36). Both cyclins interact with p107 and the related p130 protein, at least in part, through a conserved RXL-type cyclin/Cdk2 binding motif within the spacer region (2, 12, 21, 62, 67, 68). This cyclin-binding motif is present in a number of cyclin/Cdk2 binding proteins, including substrates, such as Rb, E2F-1, Skp2, Cdh1, human papillomavirus (HPV) replication protein E1, p220NPAT, and Cdc6, and inhibitor proteins, such as p21Cip1, p27Kip1, and p57Kip2 (2, 3, 13, 17, 18, 21, 34, 42, 43, 51, 52, 54, 60, 61). The RXL motif binds to a conserved "hydrophobic patch" on cyclins A and E (10, 52, 55). This RXL-dependent interaction of substrates with cyclins A and E is thought to facilitate their phosphorylation by the Cdk2 subunit (1). However, the functional significance of the interaction between p107 and cyclin/Cdk2 complexes is unclear since p107 growth suppression activity does not appear to be regulated by these kinases in vivo (7).
Although several key residues in the "hydrophobic patch" to which the RXL motif binds are conserved in the D-type cyclins, it is not clear whether D-type cyclins depend upon RXL motifs for the recognition of p107 or any other substrate. Dutta and coworkers (61) showed that an RXL-containing peptide derived from p21Cip1 competitively inhibits cyclin/Cdk2 kinase activity but does not affect cyclin D1/Cdk4 kinase activity. On the other hand, when the E2F1-derived RXL was fused to the C terminus of an otherwise nonphosphorylatable mutant of Rb that contains phosphoacceptor sites but lacks RXL sequences, in vitro phosphorylation by cyclin D/Cdk4 was restored (3).
In this study we provide the first biochemical evidence that cyclin D/Cdk4 directly phosphorylates and regulates p107 in vivo. Moreover, we show that, while p107 and cyclin D1/Cdk4 do not form a stable complex, the ability of cyclin D1/Cdk4 to overcome p107-mediated growth arrest is enhanced by the presence of an intact RXL motif, presumably for a transient enzyme:substrate interaction. In vitro, this interaction allows more efficient phosphorylation of four sites in p107 whose modification is required to inactivate p107's growth-suppressive activity in tissue culture cells.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids. pcDNA3-p107HA was used as a template for site-directed mutagenesis to generate pcDNA-p107A4HA in which K657-L660 were replaced by alanine. To construct baculoviruses, BamHI/XbaI fragments containing p107HA or p107A4HA were inserted into pBlueBac4.5 (Invitrogen) prior to cotransfection with Bac-N-Blue DNA into Sf9 cells. To generate EYFP-p107 fusion constructs, SacII/XbaI fragments containing p107HA or p107A4HA were cloned into pEYFP-C1 (Clontech). pGEX-2TK/p107(618-672) and pGEX-2TK/p107A4(618-672) were generated by PCR amplification by using pcDNA/p107HA or pcDNA3/p107A4HA as templates with the 5' primer (CCATATGCACCCAAGAG) and the 3' primer (CCGAATTCAGATCTTGTCC). The PCR products were cloned into pTOPO2.1 (Invitrogen). p107(618-672) and p107A4(618-672) as NdeI/BamHI fragments were then ligated into the NdeI/BamHI site of pGEX-2TK. Phosphorylation site mutations were generated by conventional PCR based mutagenesis by using high-fidelity Taq polymerase (Roche). All constructs were sequenced in their entirety to rule out spurious mutations. The sequences of oligonucleotides employed here are available upon request.
Protein purification.
Recombinant p107HA and p107A4HA were purified from infected Sf9. Briefly, cells were lysed in NETN buffer (0.5% Nonidet P-40, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM NaF, 30 mM p-nitrophenylphosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) containing freshly added protease inhibitors (1 µg/ml of antipain, leupeptin and aprotinin). Cleared lysates were incubated with anti-HA monoclonal antibody (BAbCO 16B12; dilution 1:150) and protein A/G plus agarose (Santa Cruz) at 4°C for 2 h. Cyclin D1/glutathione S-transferase (GST)-Cdk4, GST-cyclin A/Cdk2, and GST-cyclin E/Cdk2 complexes were expressed in Hi5 cells and purified by using GSH-Sepharose (Pharmacia), followed by elution with 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 20% glycerol, and 20 mM glutathione (pH 8.0) as described previously (15). For purification of p107 spacer mutants, the indicated pGEX2TK-p107(618-672) constructs were transformed into BL21(DE3) cells. For each construct, 100 ml of culture was induced with 400 nM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) for 4 h. Cells were collected and resuspended in NETN buffer with protease inhibitors, followed by sonication. Cleared lysates were incubated with GSH-Sepharose for 2 h at 4°C. Immobilized GST-p107(618-672) proteins were eluted with 50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 20% glycerol, and 20 mM glutathione (pH 8.0). In some experiments, p107(618-672) (100 µg) was cleaved from GST by using thrombin (0.1 U) at room temperature for 6 h. Thrombin activity was terminated by adding phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride at a final concentration of 1 mM. The pGEX-2TK plasmid places a protein kinase A phosphorylation site at the N terminus of p107(618-672) that is retained after thrombin cleavage. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford assays (Bio-Rad). In some cases, the relative concentrations of p107(617-672) proteins were determined by measuring the [
-32P]ATP incorporation after incubation with protein kinase A (Sigma) in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5)-15 mM MgCl2 in the presence of 50 µM ATP and 25 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (37°C for 30 min).
For immunoprecipitation of p107 from C33A cells, asynchronous cells from four 150-mm dishes were collected and lysed in 0.5% NETN with freshly added protease inhibitors. Anti-p107 monoclonal antibodies (Santa Cruz SC-250; dilution 1:100) and protein A/G plus agarose (Santa Cruz) were added to the cleared lysate and rotated at 4°C for 2 h. Immune complexes were washed three times with NETN and two times with 1x kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5], 15 mM MgCl2) before kinase assays were performed.
In vitro kinase assays.
In vitro kinase assays were performed in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5)-15 mM MgCl2 in the presence of 50 µM ATP and 5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP. The reaction was incubated at 37°C for 30 min and terminated by adding 2x sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer.
In vivo labeling. U2OS cells were transfected with pcDNA3-p107HA by using FuGENE 6. At 24 h after transfection, cells were labeled with [32P]orthophosphate (1 mCi/ml) for 6 h before being harvested. Cells were lysed in NETN buffer supplemented with 5 mM NaF, 30 mM p-nitrophenylphosphate, 20 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). The cleared lysate was subjected to immunoprecipitation by using a mixture of antibodies (anti-HA, anti-p107 [SD9], and anti-p107 [C-18]) to facilitate efficient capture of p107. The immune complex was washed three times with NETN and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on a 4 to 12% gel prior to autoradiography and peptide mapping.
Phosphopeptide mapping. Phosphorylated p107 was fractionated by SDS-PAGE and gels transferred to nitrocellulose prior to autoradiography. Radiolabeled p107 was excised, and filters were then treated with 10 µg of sequencing-grade trypsin (Roche) in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate at 37°C overnight. The resulting tryptic peptides were oxidized with performic acid and processed as previously described (9). Approximately 4,000 cpm were subjected to two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping on a thin-layer cellulose glass plate (VWR). Electrophoresis was carried out in a solution composed of 88% formic acid-acetic acid-H2O (50:156:1,794 [vol/vol/vol]; pH 1.9) for 45 min at 1,024 V by using the Hunter Thin Layer Electrophoresis System (HTLE-7000). The second dimension was developed by ascending chromatography in n-butanol-pyridine-acetic acid-H2O (75:50:15:60 [vol/vol/vol/vol]) for 12 h. Phosphopeptides were visualized by autoradiography.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization mass spectrometry with delayed extraction (Voyager-DE; Perspective Biosystems) was used for the identification of phosphopeptides, as described previously (65). An electrospray ion trap mass spectrometer (LCQ, Finnigan) coupled on-line with a capillary high-pressure liquid chromatograph (Magic 2002) was used for identification of phosphorylation sites. A MAGICMS C18 column (5 micron particle diameter) was used for liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis.
Phosphoamino acid analysis and phosphopeptide sequencing. For phosphoamino acid analysis, peptides were scraped off the electrophoresis plate and eluted from the cellulose support by using 88% formic acid-acetic acid-H2O (50:156:1,794 [vol/vol/vol/vol]; pH 1.9) three times with 200 µl each time, followed by a single elution with 200 µl of H2O. Pooled elutions were dried and hydrolyzed in 6 N HCl at 110°C for 1 h. The sample was dried and dissolved in 20 µl of 88% formic acid-acetic acid-H2O (50:156:1,794 [vol/vol/vol]; pH 1.9) prior to being mixed with phosphoamino acid standards. The sample was applied to a thin-layer cellulose glass plate, followed by electrophoresis as previously described (9). The positions of phosphoamino acid standards were visualized by 0.25% ninhydrin dissolved in acetone and marked with a pencil. Radiolabeled phosphoamino acids were visualized by autoradiography. For phosphopeptide sequencing, eluted phosphopeptides were subjected to automated Edman degradation (Baylor Protein Core Facility), and the radioactivity in each cycle was determined by liquid scintillation.
Pulse bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling and immunofluorescence. At 24 h after transfection, cells were incubated with 50 µM BrdU for 6 to 10 h prior to fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde. Cells were washed two times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and permeablized with 0.1% Triton X-100-PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with anti-BrdU monoclonal antibodies (Amersham RPN 202) at 37°C for 4 h, followed by washing with PBS. Anti-BrdU antibodies were detected by using Alexa 594-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies (1:200 in 50% goat serum-PBS). The cells were washed two times with PBS and incubated in DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) solution (a 1:2,000 dilution in PBS from a stock of 2 mg/ml) for 5 min at room temperature. Coverslips were mounted with 20 µl of Vectashield (H-1000; Vector Laboratories, Inc.) and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus).
Sequence analysis and modelling. Sequence conservation analysis was performed after the sequences of A-, D-, and E-type cyclins were aligned by using CLUSTALW 1.6. The sequences used were human cyclin E1 (A40270), mouse cyclin E1 (X75888), frog cyclin E2 (Q91780), human cyclin E2 (AF106690), mouse cyclin E2 (Q9Z238), fly cyclin E1 (S41756), zebra fish cyclin E1 (P47794), human cyclin A2 (X68303), cow cyclin A2 (X68321), fly cyclin A (JC1390), clam cyclin A (A26328), mouse cyclin D1 (S78355), human cyclin D3 (M92287), zebra fish cyclin D1 (S62730), human cyclin D1 (A38977), fly cyclin D (U41808), and rat cyclin D2 (D16308). The resulting alignment was analyzed in the program Aesop (M. Noble, unpublished data) to identify conserved residues that contribute to the cyclin molecular surface. Amino acids with similar properties (L, I, and V; S and T; D and E; Y and F; and R and K) were treated as identical. Residues 100% conserved by this criterion are indicated in Fig. 1.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To test this possibility, we generated a p107 mutant (p107A4) in which the cyclin binding motif (Lys-Arg-Arg-Leu) at residues 657 to 660 was replaced by four alanine residues. Similar mutations in other RXL motifs have been shown to abolish association with A- or E-type cyclins (32, 43). Coding sequences for this p107 mutant, as well as for wild-type p107, were fused at the N terminus with enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) and placed under control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. p107A4 retained the ability to interact with E2F4 in insect cell coinfection experiments (data not shown) and, as such, this mutant protein was expected to block cell proliferation via repression of E2F target genes. Wild-type p107 and p107A4 were transiently expressed in p107-sensitive Saos-2 cells, and the number of p107-expressing S-phase cells was assessed by measuring BrdU incorporation. Fewer than 2% of cells expressing EYFP-p107A4 were in S phase 36 h after transfection versus 35% of cells transfected with pCMV-EYFP alone (Fig. 2). The extent of growth suppression by p107A4 was similar to that seen with wild-type p107 (Fig. 2). Consistent with previous studies, cotransfection of vectors expressing cyclin D1/Cdk4 led to a dramatic reversal of growth suppression by p107, with 36% of cells in S phase (Fig. 2), indicating a virtually complete reversal of G1 arrest mediated by p107. In contrast, cotransfection of cyclin D1/Cdk4 with EYFP-p107A4 resulted in a much smaller increase in S-phase cells (up to 14%) (Fig. 2). Reversal of growth suppression required catalytically active Cdk4, since cotransfection of cyclin D1 and a catalytically inactive Cdk4 mutant (D158N) led to only 5% of the cells entering S phase (Fig. 2). These results indicate that the RXL motif in the spacer region of p107 contributes to its inactivation by cyclin D1/Cdk4.
|
Cdk is overcome by cyclin E/Cdk2 (38; data not shown). To verify that the p107A4 mutant was defective in association with cyclin E, Saos-2 cells expressing cyclin EMyc, together with p107HA or p107A4HA, were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-p107 antibodies and blotted for cyclin EMyc (Fig. 3B). While cyclin EMyc was found to associate with p107 (lane 4), no association was seen with p107A4 (lane 5). Similar results were obtained in binding experiments performed with purified proteins from insect cells (Fig. 3A). These results suggest that the inability of cyclins E and A to overcome p107-mediated growth arrest is not simply a result of its sequestration and/or inhibition by p107 via the RXL motif.
|
|
-32P]ATP in the presence or absence of cyclin D1/Cdk4 (20 nM). As shown in Fig. 5A, p107 was phosphorylated by an associated kinase activity (lane 1) but the extent of phosphorylation was greatly increased upon addition of cyclin D1/Cdk4 (lane 2). Peptide mapping revealed that phosphopeptide 8 was prominent in samples lacking exogenous cyclin D1/Cdk4, whereas multiple phosphopeptides, including peptides 1, 3, 6, and 9, were formed in the presence of cyclin D/Cdk4 (Fig. 5A and B). These peptides were among those found to be efficiently phosphorylated by cyclin D1/Cdk4 by using recombinant p107. In a second experiment, we expressed p107HA in Saos-2 cells. We reasoned that p107 isolated from these cells, which are arrested in G1, would lack phosphorylation events important for p107 inactivation and, therefore, that these sites would be available for modification by cyclin D1/Cdk4 in vitro. We found that phosphopeptides 1, 3, 6, and 9 were efficiently phosphorylated, while phosphopeptide 8 was weakly phosphorylated (Fig. 5C). These data suggested that phosphopeptides 1, 3, 6, and 9 might be important for p107 inactivation by cyclin D1/Cdk4. In a third experiment, we addressed the in vivo phosphorylation status of p107. p107-insensitive U2OS cells were transfected with pCMV-p107HA and metabolically labeled with orthophosphate prior to immunoprecipitation and peptide mapping (Fig. 5D). Phosphopeptides 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9 were detected in the in vivo-labeled p107, a finding consistent with the peptides observed with in vitro modified p107 isolated from mammalian cells or recombinant p107 from insect cells (Fig. 4D and 5D).
|
Cdk4) led to the absence of phosphopeptides 1, 3, 6, and 9, as demonstrated by mixing experiments. Similarly, single (T369A) and double (S964A/S975A) mutants displayed loss of peptide 6 or peptides 1 and 3, respectively (Fig. 6F). Therefore, we conclude that phosphopeptide 1 derives from phosphorylation of S964 and that phosphopeptide 6 derives from phosphorylation of T369 (Fig. 6E). We found that p107
Cdk4 contains several prominent phosphopeptides in addition to those that we identified (Fig. 6F). The majority of these peptides are present in wild-type p107 peptide maps but at low stoichiometry. The simplest explanation for these results is that mutation of preferred sites leads to enhanced phosphorylation of sites that are normally phosphorylated but with low efficiency.
|
|
Cdk4 protein is resistant to inactivation, it would induce growth arrest in these cells. Therefore, we expressed EYFP-p107 and EYFP-p107
Cdk4 (containing alanine at T369, S640, S964, and S975) in U2OS cells and determined the number of EYFP-positive S-phase cells by BrdU incorporation. EYFP-p107 had a modest effect of BrdU incorporation relative to EYFP alone (35% versus 50% BrdU-positive, EYFP-positive cells). In contrast, only 13% of EYFP-p107
Cdk4-expressing cells were BrdU positive, when expressed at levels similar to that found with wild-type EYFP-p107 (Fig. 7A, B, and C).
|
Cdk4 blocked cell division to an extent similar to that found with wild-type p107 (Fig. 7A). However, in contrast with wild-type p107, coexpression of cyclin D1/Cdk4 was unable to reverse growth arrest mediated by the p107
Cdk4 mutant (Fig. 7A, B, and D). Thus, the results of these two assays are consistent with the idea that phosphorylation of p107 on key sites modified preferentially by cyclin D1/Cdk4 is required to reverse the growth-suppressive function of p107. RXL-mediated phosphorylation on nonconsensus Cdk phosphorylation sites. Structure-function studies with peptide substrates have defined S/T-P-X-K/R as a consensus sequence for Cdk2 and Cdc2 (26, 47, 59). The specificity of cyclin D1/Cdk4 has not been studied as intensely but in Rb, several Cdk4 phosphorylation sites conform to this consensus (15, 30, 64). Interestingly, the majority of preferred Cdk4 phosphorylation sites in p107 (S964, S975, T369, and S640) did not conform to the Cdk consensus. This, coupled with the apparent decrease in preference for these sites in the p107A4 mutant lacking the cyclin interaction motif in the spacer region (Fig. 4), led us to examine the role of the RXL motif in facilitating phosphorylation of S640 in greater detail. This residue is located near the RXL motif beginning at residue 658. We produced a GST fusion protein containing p107 (residues 618 to 672), i.e., p107(618-672), with or without the RXL motif (Fig. 8A). To aid in the analysis, we generated nonphosphorylatable point mutations at the two potential Cdk phosphorylation sites in this region (S640A and S650A). p107 fragments were then released from GST by treatment with thrombin. In vitro kinase assays with these p107 spacer fragments revealed that the vast majority of phosphorylation occurs on S640, since its mutation to alanine largely abolished phosphorylation by Cdk2 and Cdk4 (Fig. 8B and data not shown). The extent of phosphorylation observed was 7% of wild-type p107(618-672) (lanes 1 and 2). In fact, this level of phosphorylation was indistinguishable from a mutant lacking both S640 and S650 (lane 4). In contrast, mutation of S650 had little effect on the extent of phosphorylation (90% relative to wild-type p107) (lane 3). Importantly, the extent of phosphorylation of the RXL mutant (A4) was less than 1%, indicating a strict requirement for the RXL motif in phosphorylation of S640 in this p107 fragment (Fig. 8B, lane 5, and C). Interestingly, we found that mutation of S643 to arginine, which generates a more typical Cdk consensus site at S640, led to a 15-fold increase in phosphorylation at S640 in the context of a mutant lacking the RXL motif (Fig. 8D, lanes 1, 3, and 4). In contrast, this S643R mutation had no effect on S640 phosphorylation in the context of an intact RXL motif (Fig. 8D, lanes 1 and 2). Previous crystallographic studies indicate that basic residues in peptide substrates form hydrogen bonds with phosphothreonine 160 in Cdk2 and also with the main-chain oxygen of I270 in cyclin A3, thereby contributing to substrate binding (10). Thus, our data suggest that one role of the RXL motif may be to allow for efficient phosphorylation of substrate sequences lacking a basic residue at the +3 position. This may be important in the case of cyclin D1/Cdk4 since the majority of the sites modified in p107 and p130 lack basic residues at position +3 (Fig. 9).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we have addressed the question of how cyclin D1/Cdk4 controls the activity of p107 and the role of the RXL motif in p107 in this process. Several facts were established. First, although expression of cyclin D1/Cdk4 readily overcame growth suppression by p107 in a Saos-2 cotransfection assay, mutation of the RXL motif located in the spacer domain in p107 substantially reduced the efficiency of reversal by cyclin D1/Cdk4. This effect required catalytically active Cdk4, since mutation of the active site D145 essentially abolished the ability of cyclin D1/Cdk4 to overcome p107-mediated growth arrest (Fig. 2). This is consistent with a direct role for cyclin D1/Cdk4 as opposed to a role in CKI sequestration (57). Second, cyclin D1/Cdk4 phosphorylates p107 with a specificity distinct from that seen with cyclin A and cyclin E/Cdk2 (Fig. 4). The efficiency of Cdk4 preferred phosphorylation events is reduced when the RXL motif is abolished by mutation, a finding consistent with the effects of this mutation on reversal of growth suppression in transfected cells (Fig. 2). Third, we identified four phosphorylation sites that are preferentially targeted by cyclin D1/Cdk4 in vitro, and these sites are phosphorylated in tissue culture cells (Fig. 5 and 6). Fourth, replacement of these four major cyclin D1/Cdk4 phosphorylation sites in p107 by nonphosphorylatable alanine residues (p107
Cdk4) leads to a dominantly acting p107 protein. Expression of p107
Cdk4 in p107-insensitive U2OS cells leads to a dramatic reduction in BrdU-positive cells relative to wild-type p107 (Fig. 7). This effect is reminiscent of that recently observed with a nonphosphorylatable p130 protein (21). Moreover, growth suppression by p107
Cdk4 in Saos-2 cells is not efficiently overcome by coexpression of cyclin D1/Cdk4, indicating that phosphorylation of one or more of these sites is required for p107 inactivation and for cyclin D1/Cdk4 to promote proliferation in the face of p107 expression (Fig. 7). These data are consistent with the recent finding that cells lacking p107 and p130 are insensitive to the growth suppressive effects of p16 overexpression (11, 20). Thus, there is now both genetic and biochemical data directly linking Cdk4 function with inactivation of both p107 and p130. This further supports the idea that the p16/cyclin D signaling pathway is not a simple linear pathway but instead has two branches that independently regulate E2F-1, E2F-2, E2F-3, and E2F-4 family members through Rb and E2F-4 and E2F-5 through p107 and p130 (11).
The domain structures and the positions of Cdk4 phosphorylation sites in Rb (15, 30, 64), p107 (this work), and p130 (21) are summarized in Fig. 9. The data indicate that Cdk4-mediated phosphorylation of these proteins occurs primarily in three locations: (i) near the border between the N terminus and the A pocket, (ii) in the spacer region located between the A and B pockets, and (iii) in the C pocket. This overall conservation of modification events suggests that the biochemical mechanism of pocket protein inactivation is conserved in all three family members.
A total of 13 phosphorylation sites preferred by cyclin D1/Cdk4 have now been identified in three pocket proteins (15, 21, 30, 31, 37, 64). Among these sequences, the -2 position was found to contain proline in nine cases and two other phosphorylation sites contained proline at -3. Thus, these data would indicate that cyclin D/Cdk4 complexes strongly prefer substrates containing proline residues at -2 or -3. Previous studies with peptide substrates have suggested a preference for basic residues at position +3 for Cdk2 and Cdc2 (26, 59). At this position, arginine or lysine side chains make salt bridges with a phosphate group present on Thr-160 in Cdk2, the site of modification by Cdk activating kinase. This interaction likely increases the affinity of substrates for the kinase and may also help orient the substrate (10). Although the majority of Cdk4 sites in Rb contain a basic residue at the +3 position, this situation is rare in p107 and p130. One such site in p107 is S640, which contains a serine at the +3 position (S643). We have found that phosphorylation of S640 in the context of a spacer fragment of p107 is fully dependent upon the presence of an intact RXL motif with all three cyclin/Cdk complexes examined (Fig. 8 and data not shown). Interestingly, phosphorylation at S640 in the absence of an intact RXL motif could be partially restored upon replacement of S643 by arginine (Fig. 8D). These data suggest that RXL motifs can facilitate the phosphorylation of substrate sequences that lack a basic residue at +3. In principle, the presence of an RXL motif in a substrate can greatly expand the types of sequences available within Cdk phosphorylation sites because the loss of binding energy in substrates with suboptimal sequences can be partially compensated for by RXL-mediated substrate recruitment.
It has been proposed that cyclin D1/Cdk4 mediated phosphorylation of Rb allows access of cyclin E/Cdk2 to the pocket region to phosphorylate sites that complete the inactivation process (22). What is the role of cyclin E and cyclin A/Cdk complexes in p107 regulation? Although it is clear that these kinases assemble with p107 and p130 in a sequential manner during cell division, the precise roles for these interactions are unclear (36, 58, 67). Previous studies have provided evidence that interaction of p107 with cyclin A/Cdk2 may serve an inhibitory function, much like Cdk inhibitors, while simultaneously leading to p107 phosphorylation (62, 67). However, it appears that E- and A-type cyclin/Cdk complexes are not sufficient to inactivate the growth-suppressive function of p107, presumably because they do not efficiently target sites that are required for p107 inactivation (7, 63; the present study). We also note that coexpression of cyclin E/Cdk2 cannot reverse the growth-suppressive effects of a mutant p107 protein lacking the spacer RXL motif despite the fact that this mutant p107 protein does not stably associate with cyclin E (Fig. 2 and 3). Thus, it would appear that, in contrast to the situation with a nonphosphorylatable Rb protein, active cyclin E/Cdk2 complexes are unable to bypass p107 growth arrest (5, 38, 41). This reinforces the notion that growth arrest by p107 and Rb occur via distinct mechanisms.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant GM54137 and the Welch Foundation to J.W.H. A portion of this work was performed with the support of a Vallee Visiting Professorship at Oxford University to J.W.H.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Adams, P. D., W. R. Sellers, S. K. Sharma, A. D. Wu, C. M. Nalin, and W. G. Kaelin, Jr. 1996. Identification of a cyclin-Cdk2 recognition motif present in substrates and p21-like cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:6623-6633.
3.
Adams, P. D., X. Li, W. R. Sellers, K. B. Baker, X. Leng, J. W. Harper, Y. Taya, and W. G. Kaelin, Jr. 1999. Retinoblastoma protein contains a C-terminal motif that targets it for phosphorylation by cyclin-Cdk complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1068-1080.
4. Aktas, H., H. Cai, and G. M. Cooper. 1997. Ras links growth factor signaling to the cell cycle machinery via regulation of cyclin D1 and the Cdk inhibitor p27KIP1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3850-3857.[Abstract]
5. Alevizopoulos, K., J. Vlach, S. Hennecke, and B. Amati. 1997. Cyclin E and c-Myc promote cell proliferation in the presence of p16INK4a and of hypophosphorylated retinoblastoma family proteins. EMBO J. 16:5322-5333.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Bartek, J., J. Bartkova, and J. Lukas. 1997. The retinoblastoma protein pathway in cell cycle control and cancer. Exp. Cell Res. 237:1-6.[CrossRef][Medline]
7.
Beijersbergen, R. L., L. Carlee, R. M. Kerkhoven, and R. Bernards. 1995. Regulation of the retinoblastoma protein-related p107 by G1 cyclin complexes. Genes Dev. 9:1340-1353.
8.
Blain, S. W., E. Montalvo, and J. Massague. 1997. Differential interaction of the cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) inhibitor p27Kip1 with cyclin A-Cdk2 and cyclin D2-Cdk4. J. Biol. Chem. 272:25863-25872.
9. Boyle, W. J., P. van der Geer, and T. Hunter. 1991. Phosphopeptide mapping and phosphoamino acid analysis by two-dimensional separation on thin-layer cellulose plates. Methods Enzymol. 201:110-149.[Medline]
10. Brown, N. R., M. E. Noble, J. A. Endicott, and L. N. Johnson. 1999. The structural basis for specificity of substrate and recruitment peptides for cyclin-dependent kinases. Nat. Cell Biol. 1:438-443.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Bruce, J. L., R. K. Hurford, Jr., M. Classon, J. Koh, and N. Dyson. 2000. Requirements for cell cycle arrest by p16INK4a. Mol. Cell 6:737-742.[CrossRef][Medline]
12.
Castano, E., Y. Kleyner, and B. D. Dynlacht. 1998. Dual cyclin-binding domains are required for p107 to function as a kinase inhibitor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:5380-5391.
13. Chen, J., P. Saha, S. Kornbluth, B. D. Dynlacht, and A. Dutta. 1996. Cyclin-binding motifs are essential for the function of p21CIP1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4673-4682.[Abstract]
14. Cheng, M., P. Olivier, J. A. Diehl, M. Fero, M. F. Roussel, J. M. Roberts, and C. J. Sherr. 1999. The p21(Cip1) and p27(Kip1) CDK "inhibitors" are essential activators of cyclin D-dependent kinases in murine fibroblasts. EMBO J. 18:1571-1583.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Connell-Crowley, L., J. W. Harper, and D. W. Goodrich. 1997. Cyclin D1/Cdk4 regulates retinoblastoma protein-mediated cell cycle arrest by site-specific phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:287-301.[Abstract]
16.
Dannenberg, J. H., A. van Rossum, L. Schuijff, and H. te Riele. 2000. Ablation of the retinoblastoma gene family deregulates G1 control causing immortalization and increased cell turnover under growth-restricting conditions. Genes Dev. 14:3051-3064.
17.
Delmolino, L. M., P. Saha, and A. Dutta. 2001. Multiple mechanisms regulate subcellular localization of human CDC6. J. Biol. Chem. 276:26947-26954.
18. Dynlacht, B. D., K. Moberg, J. A. Lees, E. Harlow, and L. Zhu. 1997. Specific regulation of E2F family members by cyclin-dependent kinases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3867-3875.[Abstract]
19.
Dyson, N. 1998. The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev. 12:2245-2262.
20. Gaubatz, S., G. J. Lindeman, S. Ishida, L. Jakoi, J. R. Nevins, D. M. Livingston, and R. E. Rempel. 2000. E2F4 and E2F5 play an essential role in pocket protein-mediated G1 control. Mol. Cell 6:729-735.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Hansen, K., T. Farkas, J. Lukas, K. Holm, L. Ronnstrand, and J. Bartek. 2001. Phosphorylation-dependent and -independent functions of p130 cooperate to evoke a sustained G1 block. EMBO J. 20:422-432.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Harbour, J. W., R. X. Luo, S. A. Dei, A. A. Postigo, and D. C. Dean. 1999. Cdk phosphorylation triggers sequential intramolecular interactions that progressively block Rb functions as cells move through G1. Cell 98:859-869.[CrossRef][Medline]
23.
Harbour, J. W., and D. C. Dean. 2000. The Rb/E2F pathway: expanding roles and emerging paradigms. Genes Dev. 14:2393-2409.
24.
Hauser, P. J., D. Agrawal, B. Chu, and W. J. Pledger. 1997. p107 and p130 associated cyclin A has altered substrate specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 272:22954-22959.
25. Hoffmann, I., G. Draetta, and E. Karsenti. 1994. Activation of the phosphatase activity of human cdc25A by a cdk2-cyclin E-dependent phosphorylation at the G1/S transition. EMBO J. 13:4302-4310.[Medline]
26.
Holmes, J. K., and M. J. Solomon. 1996. A predictive scale for evaluating cyclin-dependent kinase substrates. A comparison of p34cdc2 and p33cdk2. J. Biol. Chem. 271:25240-25246.
27.
Huang, D., J. Moffat, W. A. Wilson, L. Moore, C. Cheng, P. J. Roach, and B. Andrews. 1998. Cyclin partners determine Pho85 protein kinase substrate specificity in vitro and in vivo: control of glycogen biosynthesis by Pcl8 and Pcl10. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:3289-3299.
28.
Hurford, R. K., Jr., D. Cobrinik, M. H. Lee, and N. Dyson. 1997. pRB and p107/p130 are required for the regulated expression of different sets of E2F responsive genes. Genes Dev. 11:1447-1463.
29. Kitagawa, M., H. Higashi, I. Suzuki-Takahashi, K. Segawa, S. K. Hanks, Y. Taya, S. Nishimura, and A. Okuyama. 1995. Phosphorylation of E2F-1 by cyclin A-cdk2. Oncogene 10:229-236.[Medline]
30. Kitagawa, M., H. Higashi, H. K. Jung, I. Suzuki-Takahashi, M. Ikeda, K. Tamai, J. Kato, K. Segawa, E. Yoshida, S. Nishimura, and Y. Taya. 1996. The consensus motif for phosphorylation by cyclin D1-Cdk4 is different from that for phosphorylation by cyclin A/E-Cdk2. EMBO J. 15:7060-7069.[Medline]
31.
Knudsen, E. S., and J. Y. Wang. 1996. Differential regulation of retinoblastoma protein function by specific Cdk phosphorylation sites. J. Biol. Chem. 271:8313-8320.
32. Krek, W., M. E. Ewen, S. Shirodkar, Z. Arany, W. G. Kaelin, Jr., and D. M. Livingston. 1994. Negative regulation of the growth-promoting transcription factor E2F-1 by a stably bound cyclin A-dependent protein kinase. Cell 78:161-172.[CrossRef][Medline]
33.
LaBaer, J., M. D. Garrett, L. F. Stevenson, J. M. Slingerland, C. Sandhu, H. S. Chou, A. Fattaey, and E. Harlow. 1997. New functional activities for the p21 family of CDK inhibitors. Genes Dev. 11:847-862.
34. Lacy, S., and P. Whyte. 1997. Identification of a p130 domain mediating interactions with cyclin A/cdk 2 and cyclin E/cdk 2 complexes. Oncogene 14:2395-2406.[CrossRef][Medline]
35.
Lavoie, J. N., G. l'Allemain, A. Brunet, R. Muller, and J. Pouyssegur. 1996. Cyclin D1 expression is regulated positively by the p42/p44MAPK and negatively by the p38/HOGMAPK pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 271:20608-20616.
36.
Lees, E., B. Faha, V. Dulic, S. I. Reed, and E. Harlow. 1992. Cyclin E/cdk2 and cyclin A/cdk2 kinases associate with p107 and E2F in a temporally distinct manner. Genes Dev. 6:1874-1885.
37. Lees, J. A., K. J. Buchkovich, D. R. Marshak, C. W. Anderson, and E. Harlow. 1991. The retinoblastoma protein is phosphorylated on multiple sites by human cdc2. EMBO J. 10:4279-4290.[Medline]
38. Leng, X., L. Connell-Crowley, D. Goodrich, and J. W. Harper. 1997. S-phase entry upon ectopic expression of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases in the absence of retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation. Curr. Biol. 7:709-712.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Lipinski, M. M., and T. Jacks. 1999. The retinoblastoma gene family in differentiation and development. Oncogene 18:7873-7882.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Lukas, J., D. Parry, L. Aagaard, D. J. Mann, J. Bartkova, M. Strauss, G. Peters, and J. Bartek. 1995. Retinoblastoma-protein-dependent cell-cycle inhibition by the tumour suppressor p16. Nature 375:503-506.[CrossRef][Medline]
41.
Lukas, J., T. Herzinger, K. Hansen, M. C. Moroni, D. Resnitzky, K. Helin, S. I. Reed, and J. Bartek. 1997. Cyclin E-induced S phase without activation of the pRb/E2F pathway. Genes Dev. 11:1479-1492.
42.
Ma, T., N. Zou, B. Y. Lin, L. T. Chow, and J. W. Harper. 1999. Interaction between cyclin-dependent kinases and human papillomavirus replication-initiation protein E1 is required for efficient viral replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:382-387.
43.
Ma, T., B. A. Van Tine, Y. Wei, M. D. Garrett, D. Nelson, P. D. Adams, J. Wang, J. Qin, L. T. Chow, and J. W. Harper. 2000. Cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation of p220(NPAT) by cyclin E/Cdk2 in Cajal bodies promotes histone gene transcription. Genes Dev. 14:2298-2313.
44. Matsushime, H., M. E. Ewen, D. K. Strom, J. Y. Kato, S. K. Hanks, M. F. Roussel, and C. J. Sherr. 1992. Identification and properties of an atypical catalytic subunit (p34PSK-J3/cdk4) for mammalian D type G1 cyclins. Cell 71:323-334.[CrossRef][Medline]
45.
Medema, R. H., R. E. Herrera, F. Lam, and R. A. Weinberg. 1995. Growth suppression by p16ink4 requires functional retinoblastoma protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6289-6293.
46.
Meyerson, M., and E. Harlow. 1994. Identification of G1 kinase activity for cdk6, a novel cyclin D partner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:2077-2086.
47. Minshull, J., R. Golsteyn, C. S. Hill, and T. Hunt. 1990. The A- and B-type cyclin-associated cdc2 kinases in Xenopus turn on and off at different times in the cell cycle. EMBO J. 9:2865-2875.[Medline]
48. Morgan, D. O. 1997. Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:261-291.[CrossRef][Medline]
49.
Muller, H., A. P. Bracken, R. Vernell, M. C. Moroni, F. Christians, E. Grassilli, E. Prosperini, E. Vigo, J. D. Oliner, and K. Helin. 2001. E2Fs regulate the expression of genes involved in differentiation, development, proliferation, and apoptosis. Genes Dev. 15:267-285.
50.
Parry, D., D. Mahony, K. Wills, and E. Lees. 1999. Cyclin D-CDK subunit arrangement is dependent on the availability of competing INK4 and p21 class inhibitors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1775-1783.
51. Petersen, B. O., J. Lukas, C. S. Sorensen, J. Bartek, and K. Helin. 1999. Phosphorylation of mammalian CDC6 by cyclin A/CDK2 regulates its subcellular localization. EMBO J. 18:396-410.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. Russo, A. A., P. D. Jeffrey, A. K. Patten, J. Massague, and N. P. Pavletich. 1996. Crystal structure of the p27Kip1 cyclin-dependent-kinase inhibitor bound to the cyclin A-Cdk2 complex. Nature 382:325-331.[CrossRef][Medline]
53.
Sage, J., G. J. Mulligan, L. D. Attardi, A. Miller, S. Chen, B. Williams, E. Theodorou, and T. Jacks. 2000. Targeted disruption of the three Rb-related genes leads to loss of G1 control and immortalization. Genes Dev. 14:3037-3050.
54. Saha, P., Q. Eichbaum, E. D. Silberman, B. J. Mayer, and A. Dutta. 1997. p21CIP1 and Cdc25A: competition between an inhibitor and an activator of cyclin-dependent kinases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4338-4345.[Abstract]
55. Schulman, B. A., D. L. Lindstrom, and E. Harlow. 1998. Substrate recruitment to cyclin-dependent kinase 2 by a multipurpose docking site on cyclin A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:10453-10458.
56. Sherr, C. J. 1994. G1 phase progression: cycling on cue. Cell 79:551-555.[CrossRef]