Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2002, p. 2487-2497, Vol. 22, No. 8
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.8.2487-2497.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pharmacology,1 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 275992
Received 4 October 2001/ Returned for modification 2 November 2001/ Accepted 9 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Vav proteins (Vav, Vav2, and Vav3) are mammalian members of the Dbl family of proteins (7). All Vav proteins have similar structural organizations. Like all Dbl family proteins, Vav proteins possess a Dbl homology (DH) domain followed by a COOH-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (8, 39). Previous studies indicate that the DH domain interacts directly with Rho family GTPases to catalyze GDP release (8, 39). The Vav DH domains exhibit broad GTPase specificity and serve as GEFs for multiple Rho GTPases (RhoA, RhoG, Rac1, and Cdc42), although different studies have reached contrasting conclusions regarding the specific GTPases targeted by Vav (1, 12, 17, 23, 28, 35, 43).
The invariant topography of DH and PH domains (DH/PH domain) found in all Dbl family proteins suggests a critical role for the PH domain in regulation of DH domain function. Extensive structure-function analyses of the DH/PH domains of various Dbl family proteins suggest that the PH domain may serve two distinct functions to modulate DH domain activity (8, 39). First, the PH domain may act as a positive modulator of the intrinsic catalytic activity of the DH domain. For example, a comparison of the catalytic activities of the DH and DH/PH domains derived from several Dbl family proteins (e.g., Dbl, Trio, and Dbs) showed that the GEF activity exhibited by a PH-containing protein was up to 100-fold greater than that measured for the DH domain alone in vitro (24, 34, 44). Second, it may serve a membrane-targeting function and regulate DH domain interaction with its membrane-bound GTPase substrates. For example, the loss of function caused by mutation of the PH domains of Lfc and Dbs could be reversed by addition of a plasma membrane targeting sequence (40, 41).
In contrast to what has been observed for many Dbl family proteins, the PH domains of Vav proteins appear to serve as negative regulators of DH domain function and no role in membrane targeting has been described. Han and colleagues determined that the PH domain of Vav serves as a negative regulator of DH domain GEF activity in vitro (18). This negative regulatory function is promoted by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-phosphate (PIP2), a substrate of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), and is antagonized by the PI3K product, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-phosphate (PIP3). Hence, PI3K activation is proposed to facilitate the activation of Vav. Consistent with a negative regulatory function for the PH domain, Ma et al. determined that a variant of Vav with its PH domain deleted was activated constitutively in vivo (26). In evaluations of PH domain function in NH2-terminally truncated and constitutively activated versions of Vav proteins, mutation of the PH domains of Vav and Vav3 did not cause significant alteration in GEF activity in vitro or growth and/or morphological transforming activity in vivo, suggesting that the PH domain is not a critical regulator of Vav DH domain function (18, 28). Since the role of the PH domain in Vav2 function has not been addressed, it has not been previously established whether the PH domains of Vav family proteins exhibit similar or distinct functions.
Vav proteins also contain additional protein-protein or protein-lipid interaction domains that flank the DH/PH domains. A calponin homology domain and an acidic amino acid-rich domain positioned NH2 terminal to the DH and PH domains serve negative regulatory roles in Vav function (7). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the NH2-terminal region relieves this negative regulatory function. Hence, mutant versions of all three Vav proteins with the NH2 termini deleted are activated constitutively in a phosphorylation-independent fashion and exhibit potent transforming activity (2, 20). COOH terminal to the PH domain are a cysteine-rich domain (CRD) and an Src homology 2 (SH2) domain that is flanked by two SH3 domains. The role of the SH domains is to facilitate the phosphorylation of Vav (7). Consistent with this role, the SH domains are dispensable for the transforming activities of the NH2-terminally truncated and transforming versions of Vav (35). In contrast, mutational analyses determined that the CRD is critical for the growth and/or morphological transforming activity of Vav and Vav3 (11, 28). While the precise role of the CRD in Vav function is not known, the impaired GEF activity in vitro of a Vav3 CRD mutant, coupled with the capacity of the isolated Vav3 CRD to bind to RhoA in vitro, argues that the CRD may facilitate DH domain interaction with its GTPase substrates (28). Thus, the CRD may substitute functionally for the PH domain and hence render the PH domain dispensable for Vav function. Whether the CRD can also regulate Vav association with membranes has not been determined.
In light of the incomplete or conflicting observations regarding the role of the PH domain and CRD in Vav function, we have evaluated the biological and biochemical contributions of the PH domain and the CRD to Vav2 catalytic activity in vitro and signaling and transforming activity in vivo. In contrast to previous observations with Vav and Vav3, we found that an intact PH domain is not required for the catalytic activity of the DH domain in vitro but is required for complete biological and catalytic activity of Vav2 in vivo and facilitates Vav2 association with membranes. Similarly, mutation of the CRD also impaired Vav2 signaling and transformation, in part, by impairing the intrinsic catalytic activity of the DH domain. Finally, we found that PI3K activation enhanced the signaling and transforming activity of Vav2; this enhancement involves the PH domain but does not promote Vav2 association with membranes. Taken together, our observations suggest the PH domain and the CRD are both essential for complete Vav2 activity but that they serve distinct functions in regulating DH domain activity.
|
|
|---|
Cell culture and transformation assay. NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% calf serum. DNA transfections for transformation assays were performed by using the calcium phosphate precipitation method as described previously (9). For each assay, the cognate empty vector was used as a control. The transfected cultures were maintained in culture media for 14 days, fixed, and stained with crystal violet (0.5%), and the number of foci of transformed cells was then quantitated. NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing the Vav2 mutants were established by transfection of pCGN-vav2 constructs and isolation of drug-resistant colonies after growth in medium supplemented with hygromycin (400 µg/µl). Multiple drug-resistant colonies (>100) were pooled together to establish stable cell lines for use in the various assays described.
Transient expression reporter gene assays. NIH 3T3 cells were transfected by Lipofectamine Plus according to the manufacturer's protocol. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were starved for 12 to 14 h with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 0.5% bovine calf serum. Analyses of the cell lysates of the transiently transfected NIH 3T3 cells were performed using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents and a Monolight 2010 luminometer (Analytical Luminescence). The (SREm)2 reporter plasmid contains a luciferase gene whose expression is under the control of a serum response factor (SRF)-responsive promoter as has been described previously (38). All assays were performed at least in triplicate.
Guanine nucleotide exchange assays. cDNA fragments encoding either human Vav2-DPC (residues 192 to 573) or the Vav2 PH domain (K407A) and CRD (K533A, K538A, K563A, and V568E) mutants were generated by PCR and inserted into the NcoI/XhoI sites of bacterial expression vector pET-28a (Novagen). The bacterial expression constructs were transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21 (DE3), and protein expression was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) at 22°C. The recombinant proteins were His6 tagged at their COOH termini and were purified from bacterial lysate on a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose column (Qiagen). Bacterially expressed glutathione S-transferase (GST)-RhoA(F25N), GST-Rac1(WT), and GST-Cdc42(WT) proteins were kindly provided by J. Sondek.
Fluorescence spectroscopy analysis of N-methylanthraniloyl (mant)-GDP incorporation into GDP-preloaded Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA was carried out with a Perkin-Elmer LS 50 B spectrometer at 20°C as described previously (1). Exchange reaction mixtures containing 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 400 nM mant-GDP (Biomol), and 2 µM GTPase were prepared and allowed to equilibrate with continuous stirring. After equilibration, each Vav2 polypeptide was added to 100 nM, and the relative mant fluorescence (excitation
[
ex] = 360 nm; emission
[
em] = 440 nm) was monitored. All experiments were performed in duplicate.
|
|
|---|
We determined previously that NH2-terminal deletion of all sequences upstream of the DH domain of Vav2 (amino acids 1 to 191) results in a constitutively activated, highly transforming Vav2 mutant (1). In the present study, we determined that the COOH-terminal SH3-SH2-SH3 domain sequence is also dispensable for Vav2 transforming and signaling activity (Fig. 1 and 2). Thus, as has been reported for Vav (35), the fragment of Vav2 that contains the DH, PH, and CRD regions alone (designated Vav2-DPC) defines a minimal functional, transforming unit of Vav2. Therefore, we introduced mutations into an HA epitope-tagged version of Vav2-DPC to evaluate the role of the PH domain and CRD in Vav2 transforming activity.
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Primary structure and protein expression levels of the human Vav2 truncation and point mutants. (A) Schematic structure of full-length human Vav2, NH2-terminal and COOH-terminal truncation mutants, and PH domain and CRD point mutants. Horizontal lines below full-length Vav2 show the predicted translational product of each truncation or point mutant initiated at the indicated amino acid. NH2-terminally truncated Vav2 ( 1-191) is a strongly transforming variant of Vav2, and further COOH-terminal truncation to generate the Vav2-DPC fragment (DPC) did not reduce this activity. Therefore, to avoid potential complications in interpretation, all PH and CRD point mutants were generated in the background of the highly transforming Vav2-DPC fragment. Vertical lines, mutations in the PH domain (K407A and W503L) and the CRD (K533A, K538A, K563A, and V568E). Truncation mutants containing the DH and PH domains (DP) or DH domain (D) were also generated. The 1-191 and wild-type and mutant Vav2-DPC, -DP, and -D sequences were fused in frame to an HA epitope tag at the NH2 terminus. (B) Expression of the Vav2-DPC, truncation, and point mutants in stably and transiently transfected NIH 3T3 cells.
|
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Mutation of the Vav2 PH domain decreases Vav2 transforming and signaling activity. (A) NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with the empty pCGN-hygro plasmid (Vector) or pCGN-hygro plasmids encoding the various PH domain mutants (Fig. 1; 1 µg per 60-mm-diameter dish). The appearance of transformed foci was quantitated on day 14. The values represent the averages ± standard errors of three dishes and are representative of at least three independent assays. WT, wild type. (B) NIH 3T3 cells were transiently transfected with the empty pCGN-hygro plasmid or pCGN-hygro plasmids encoding the various PH domain mutants (100 ng per 60-mm-diameter dish), together with a mutant serum response element luciferase reporter plasmid to determine stimulation of SRF. Fold activation was determined by the number of relative luciferase units relative to the number of units seen with the empty vector control. Data are representative of at least three independent assays performed on duplicate plates.
|
We evaluated the expression of each mutant protein to determine if these point mutants were altered in protein stability. First, we assessed the levels of protein expression when Vav2-DPC and each mutant were expressed in transiently transfected NIH 3T3 cells. Second, we transfected NIH 3T3 cells with the empty pCGN-hygro mammalian expression vector and pCGN-hygro encoding Vav2-DPC and the W503L and K407A mutant proteins to establish mass populations of stably transfected cells. We detected comparable levels of protein expression for all mutants in the transiently or stably transfected NIH 3T3 cells, suggesting that the different amino acid substitutions did not cause a significant alteration in protein stability (Fig. 1B).
We next performed focus formation transformation assays with NIH 3T3 cells to evaluate the effect of the PH domain mutations on Vav2 transforming activity. Surprisingly, we found that, compared to that of Vav2-DPC, the transforming activity of the K407A mutant was decreased greater than threefold whereas the W503L mutant completely lost transforming activity (Fig. 2A). These results contrast with those made with Vav and Vav3 (26, 28) and demonstrate that a functional PH domain, within the context of the intact Vav2-DPC cassette, is required for full Vav2 transforming activity.
We next determined whether mutations in the PH domain correlated with decreased activation of the SRF signaling pathway mediated by Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA activation. NIH 3T3 cells were transiently transfected with expression vectors encoding Vav2-DPC and the PH domain mutant proteins. We found that the decreased transforming potential of the PH domain mutants correlated directly with a reduced ability to stimulate SRF activation (Fig. 2B). Vav2-DPC expression greatly enhanced SRF activity (70-fold), whereas the K407A mutant exhibited an approximately 10-fold-reduced ability to stimulate SRF activity and the W503L mutant was completely inactive.
Vav2 does not require an intact PH domain for the activation of GTPases in vitro, but a PH domain is required for facilitating membrane association Based on observations from structure-function analyses of other Dbl family proteins, the PH domain may be critical for the intrinsic catalytic activity of the DH domain (24, 34, 44) or, alternatively, may regulate the subcellular location of Vav2 to facilitate DH domain interaction with its membrane-bound GTPase substrates (40, 41). To distinguish between these two possibilities, we next investigated the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of wild-type and mutant Vav2-DPC in vitro. For these analyses, we purified bacterially expressed hexahistidine-tagged versions of wild-type Vav2-DPC and Vav2-DPC PH domain mutants and analyzed the activity of these proteins by quantitation of mant-GDP incorporation into bacterially expressed Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA proteins. Although both mutant proteins were expressed at equivalent levels in E. coli, the W503L mutant protein was completely insoluble when isolated, thereby preventing any detailed biochemical analysis. Consequently, we were only able to evaluate the consequences of the K407A mutant for exchange activity in vitro.
RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 alone did not exhibit significant intrinsic GDP dissociation activity in vitro (Fig. 3). As we found for Vav2-D and Vav2-DP (1), Vav2-DPC stimulated rapid GDP dissociation from Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA, which was complete within approximately 20 min (Fig. 3). Interestingly, the wild-type and K407A mutant Vav2-DPCs exhibited identical exchange activities on Rac1 (Fig. 3A). We also found that the K407A mutant displayed slightly decreased but comparable exchange activities toward Cdc42 and RhoA (Fig. 3). Therefore, mutation of residue K407 which was designed to eliminate phosphoinositide binding and is necessary for activity in vivo did not alter the GTPase specificity or catalytic activity of the Vav2-DPC fragment in vitro.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Stimulation of mant-GDP incorporation into Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA by the Vav2 PH domain mutants in vitro. The abilities of bacterially expressed wild-type Vav2-DPC and Vav2-DPC PH domain mutants (50 nM) to stimulate the incorporation of mant-GDP into bacterially expressed (2 µM) Rac1 (A), Cdc42 (B), and RhoA (C) were measured by fluorescence spectroscopy ( ex = 360 nm; em = 440 nm). Arrows, time point (300 s) at which the Vav2 PH or CRD polypeptides were added to the exchange reaction mixture. Results are representative of two independent assays.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. The Vav2 PH domain, but not the CRD, influences subcellular distribution. NIH 3T3 cells were transiently transfected with the empty pCGN mammalian expression vector and pCGN plasmids encoding the various PH domain and CRD mutants (Fig. 1; 1 µg per 60-mm-diameter dish). Subcellular fractions were prepared 48 h after transfection by lysis of cells in hypotonic buffer (0.1 M Tris [pH 7.4], 0.5 M MgCl2, 1 mM Pefabloc, 1 µM leupeptin, 2 µM pepstatin, 0.1% aprotinin) and addition of NaCl to adjust the ionic strength to 0.15 M, followed by ultracentrifugation for 30 min at 100,000 x g as described previously (5). Proteins in the crude S100 (S) and P100 (P) fractions were precipitated with 5 ml of acetone for 1 h at 4°C, collected by centrifugation at 2,000 x g for 30 min, and resuspended in 100 µl of electrophoresis sample buffer. Equal volumes of each fraction were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and protein expression was determined by Western blot analysis using the anti-HA epitope antibody.
|
To better characterize the role of the CRD in Vav2-mediated transformation and signaling, we introduced missense mutations into the CRD of Vav2-DPC at conserved, charged, surface-exposed regions that are not predicted to affect the structural integrity of the CRD. These point mutations were generated based on homology sequence alignments of CRD sequences for the various Vav family members, Raf-1, and protein kinase C (PKC) (19); known ligand-binding sequences of other CRDs; and our previously determined nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of the Raf-1 CRD (Fig. 5) (27). Structural studies on the Raf-1 CRD revealed binding determinants in the CRD that selectively interfere with ligand binding interactions. Based on these analyses, we changed lysines 533 and 538 to alanines [mutants Vav2-DPC(K533A) and Vav2-DPC(K538), respectively] (Fig. 1A and 5). These residues in Vav2 correspond to residues L149 and F151 in Raf-1, which appear to directly contact Ras but not 14-3-3 or phosphatidylserine (42). We also mutated lysine 563 to alanine and valine 568 to glutamic acid [mutants Vav2-DPC(K563A) and Vav2-DPC(V568E), respectively] (Fig. 1A). These residues correspond to a region in Raf-1 that, for the most part, has not been characterized.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Alignment of representative CRDs. The conserved cysteine and histidine residues in the different Raf serine/threonine kinases and Vav protein CRDs were aligned. Black shading, identical residues; gray shading, highly conserved residues, dashes, gaps in the alignment with PKC C1A. Residues in PKC C1A involved in diacylglycerol (DAG) and membrane binding (membrane) are indicated (19). Residues in human c-Raf-1 involved in Ras and 14-3-3 binding are also indicated (19). Arrows, residues that were mutated in human Vav2.
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Mutation of the Vav2 CRD decreases Vav2 transforming and signaling activity. (A) NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with the empty pCGN-hygro plasmid or pCGN-hygro plasmids encoding the various CRD mutants (Fig. 1; 1 µg per 60-mm-diameter dish). The appearance of transformed foci was quantitated on day 14. The values represent the averages ± standard errors of three dishes and are representative of at least three independent assays. WT, wild type. (B) NIH 3T3 cells were transiently transfected with empty pCGN plasmid or pCGN plasmids encoding the various CRD mutants (100 ng per 60-mm-diameter dish), together with the SRF luciferase reporter plasmid. Fold activation was determined by the number of relative luciferase units relative to the number of units seen with the empty vector control. Data are representative of at least three independent assays performed on duplicate plates.
|
Vav2 requires an intact CRD for the activation of GTPases in vitro. An intact CRD may be critical for the intrinsic catalytic activity of the DH domain (28) or, alternatively, by analogy to the CRD of PKC, may regulate subcellular location to facilitate DH domain interaction with its membrane-bound GTPase substrates (19). To address these two possibilities, we evaluated the GEF activity and specificity of bacterially expressed Vav2-DPC proteins containing the CRD mutations. We observed two unexpected results from these analyses. First, although all four CRD mutations compromised GEF activity in vitro, the degree of impairment was not uniform for all three Rho GTPases and was most severe for RhoA. For example, whereas K538A, K563A, and K568E mutants showed a slight but reproducible decrease in exchange on Rac and Cdc42 (Fig. 7A and B), all three were severely compromised in their ability to mediate exchange on RhoA (Fig. 7C). Substitution of K533, a residue in the region that corresponds to the phorbol ester binding site of PKC, caused the most-severe reductions in exchange activity toward all three GTPases. Vav2-DPC harboring this substitution retained a small amount of activity toward Rac1 and Cdc42 but was almost completely inactive on RhoA (Fig. 7). Second, the degree of impairment in GEF activity in vitro did not correlate directly with the impairment in signaling and transforming activity. Although K563E caused the most drastic reduction in transforming activity, it was the K533A mutant that was the most impaired in GEF activity. These results indicate that the CRD is critical for regulating the intrinsic catalytic activity of the DH domain, most critically for RhoA, and the consequences of the CRD mutations for transforming activity cannot be ascribed solely to perturbation of the intrinsic guanine nucleotide exchange activity.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Stimulation of mant-GDP incorporation into Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA by the Vav2 CRD mutants in vitro. The ability of bacterially expressed wild-type (WT) Vav2-DPC (50 nM) and Vav2-DPC with the listed substitutions within the CRD (50 nM) to stimulate the incorporation of mant-GDP into bacterially expressed (2 µM) Rac1 (A), Cdc42 (B), and RhoA (C) was measured by fluorescence spectroscopy ( ex = 360 nm; em = 440 nm). Arrows, time point (300 s) at which the Vav2 CRD polypeptides were added to the exchange reaction mixture. Results are representative of two independent assays.
|
95%), the Vav2 CRD K533A, K538A, and V568E mutants exhibited only slight reductions in the amount of protein in the membrane-containing fraction (30 to 40% in P100) compared to Vav2-DPC (Fig. 4). However, Vav2-DPC(K563A) had a significantly decreased amount of protein in the P100 fraction (20% of total protein). Thus, these results support a role for the CRD in contributing to Vav2 membrane association and suggest that the impaired transforming activity of the K563A mutant is due, in part, to impaired intrinsic catalytic activity as well as impaired interaction with membranes in vivo PI3K activation enhances Vav2 activity via the PH domain. Our mutational analyses showed that the PH domain regulates DH domain activity in vivo but not in vitro. Based on the observations made with the PH domain of Vav and other Dbl family proteins, one possible role of the Vav2 PH domain may be to bind products of PI3K that in turn facilitate Vav2 activation (18). To determine if PI3K products are regulators of Vav2 activity, we tested whether coexpression of activated PI3K would cooperate with Vav2-DPC to cause enhanced signaling and focus-forming activity. NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with the expression vector encoding Vav2-DPC, either alone or with an expression vector encoding a plasma membrane-targeted and constitutively activated variant of the p110 catalytic subunit of PI3K (p110-CAAX) (33). Expression of p110-CAAX alone did not result in any focus formation, whereas Vav2-DPC alone caused the appearance of 67 foci per dish; coexpression of p110-CAAX caused a twofold synergistic enhancement of this activity (Fig. 8A). Activated PI3K alone did not activate SRF and also caused a similar twofold enhancement of Vav2-DPC stimulation of SRF (Fig. 8B). These results suggest that products of PI3K appear to stimulate Vav2-DPC activity in vivo. Finally, to verify that p110-CAAX was active, we monitored the phosphorylation state of a PI3K target, Akt/protein kinase B, using phosphospecific Akt antibodies (Fig. 8C). Expression of p110-CAAX caused an increase in Akt phosphorylation. Interestingly, Vav2-DPC also caused Akt phosphorylation, which was enhanced by coexpression of p110-CAAX.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Coexpression of activated PI3K causes enhancement of the transforming and signaling activities of Vav2 DPC but has minimal effect on the Vav2 PH or CRD mutants. Assays were performed as described in the legends for Fig. 2 and 5 except that 500 ng of the pZIP-NeoSV(x)1 empty vector (black bars) or pZIP-NeoSV(x)1 encoding activated PI3K (p110-CAAX) (open bars) was cotransfected with 100 ng of pCGN-hygro plasmid DNA encoding the indicated Vav2 protein. (A) NIH 3T3 cells were cotransfected with control plasmid pCGN-hygro (vector) encoding the indicated Vav2 PH domain mutant proteins (Fig. 1; 100 ng per 60-mm-diameter dish), together with pZIP-NeoSV(x)1 (vector) or pZIP-p110-CAAX (500 ng per 60-mm-diameter dish). Values are the averages ± standard errors for two dishes and are representative of three independent assays. WT, wild type. (B) NIH 3T3 cells were transiently transfected with the above plasmids along with a luciferase reporter construct for SRF transcriptional activity. Data are representative of at least three independent assays performed on duplicate plates. (C) The expression of p110-CAAX in the SRF reporter assay (B) was analyzed by Western blotting 20 µg of total cell lysates with an anti-Akt and an anti-phospho-Akt (P-Akt) antibody.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Coexpression of activated PI3K and Vav2-DPC caused a synergistic increase in the level of Rac1-GTP but did not increase Vav2-DPC membrane association. (A) NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing Vav2-DPC, p110CAAX, or both were cultured for 24 h in low serum (0.1%) and lysed, and the lysates were used in GST pull-down assays using GST-PAK Rac binding domain (RBD) immobilized on glutathione agarose beads. Bound proteins and total cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Rac1 antibodies. The expression of Vav2-DPC was analyzed by Western blotting total cell lysates with an anti-HA antibody. The expression of p110-CAAX was analyzed by Western blotting total cell lysates with an anti-phospho-Akt antibody (data not shown). (B) PI3K activation does not enhance Vav2-DPC association with membranes. NIH 3T3 cells were cotransfected with the control plasmid pCGN (vector) encoding Vav2-DPC (1 µg per 60-mm-diameter dish), together with pZIP-NeoSV(x)1 (vector) or pZIP-p110CAAX (500 ng per 60-mm-diameter dish). Subcellular fractionation was performed as described for Fig. 4.
|
|
|
|---|
Previous mutagenesis studies evaluated the importance of the PH domain in Vav and Vav3 function and concluded that the PH domain served either a negative regulatory, or dispensable, role in Vav DH domain function. For example, Ma et al. found that deletion of the PH domain in full-length Vav resulted in a constitutively activated variant (26). Movilla and Bustelo observed that mutation of the invariant tryptophan residue in the PH domain of Vav3, in the context of the isolated DH/PH/CRD fragment, did not alter exchange activity in vitro or biological activity in NIH 3T3 cells (28). Thus, we were surprised to find that introduction of missense mutations in the PH domain impaired or abolished Vav2-DPC signaling and transforming activity. Why do our observations differ from those of other studies? One possibility is that the PH domain may have functions in Vav2 distinct from those in Vav and Vav3. The PH domain is one of the less conserved domains among Vav family proteins (6). However, we have also found that mutation of the PH domain of Vav, in the context of the DH/PH/CRD fragment, also abolishes signaling and transforming activity (T. Palmby, K. Abe, and C. J. Der, submitted for publication). Therefore, in our analyses, the PH domain has equivalent and necessary roles in the functions of two Vav family proteins. Thus, at present, we do not have a straightforward explanation for the different observations. Nevertheless, our conclusion that the PH domain serves a positive regulatory role in Vav2 DH domain function is similar to observations made for other Dbl family proteins. Finally, we should also stress that our studies evaluated PH domain function in a truncated, constitutively activated Vav2 protein variant. Whether the PH domain also serves a positive regulatory role in the full-length protein remains unresolved.
Structure-function analyses of other Dbl family proteins established two possible roles for the PH domain in regulating DH domain function. First, a comparison of the catalytic activities of the isolated DH and DH/PH domains of several Dbl family proteins (Dbl, Trio, and Dbs) found that the presence of the PH domain caused up to a 100-fold-enhanced guanine nucleotide exchange activity in vitro (24, 34, 44). However, we found that the K407A mutation in the PH domain did not significantly perturb catalytic activity in vitro. While we were unable to evaluate this issue with the more drastic W503L mutation, which is expected to completely perturb PH domain structure, Movilla and Bustelo found that the equivalent mutation in the PH domain of Vav3 also did not impair catalytic activity in vitro (28). Thus, in contrast to results of observations for other Dbl family proteins (24, 34, 44), the PH domain does not greatly influence the intrinsic catalytic activity of the DH domain. Finally, the PH domains of some Dbl family proteins were observed to be critical for protein function yet could be replaced by a plasma membrane-targeting sequence (40, 41). Our observation that the two PH domain mutations greatly impaired Vav2-DPC association with the membrane fraction is consistent with a role for the PH domain in promoting DH domain interaction and activation of its membrane-associated GTPase substrates. In support for such a role, we found that addition of a membrane-targeting sequence partially restored the transforming activity of the K407A mutant version of Vav (Palmby et al., submitted). However, addition of a membrane-targeting sequence to the more drastic W503L version of Vav did not restore the ability of this mutant Vav to transform NIH 3T3 cells or activate SRF. Thus, the PH domains of Vav proteins must serve a function independent of membrane targeting.
Previous studies showed that deletion of the CRD or introduction of missense mutations that disrupt the structural integrity of this domain eliminated the transforming activity of Vav and Vav3 in vivo and in vitro (11, 28). Consistent with these studies, we have shown that truncation of the CRD also completely eliminates the biological activity of the Vav2-DPC cassette. While these analyses clearly demonstrate the critical role of the CRD for the function of all Vav family proteins, they do not provide much insight into what that role may be.
Similar to the CRD of the Raf-1 serine/threonine kinase, the CRDs of Vav family proteins are atypical in that they do not bind diacylglycerol or phorbol esters and instead may bind small GTPases and other membrane lipids. However, we and others have shown that the Raf-1 CRD interacts with multiple, distinct ligands that regulate Raf-1 kinase activity (4, 13, 15, 16, 25, 42). Therefore, we further investigated the functional contributions of the Vav2 CRD by introducing specific missense mutations at surface-exposed residues not predicted to disrupt the global fold of the CRD. These mutations were based on our previously determined nuclear magnetic resonance solution structure of the CRD of Raf-1 and on mutagenesis analyses of the CRD of PKC and Raf-1 (27, 32, 36). These mutants all decreased Vav2 transforming and signaling activity to various degrees. Interestingly, the impairment in catalytic exchange activity for these mutants did not correlate directly with the impairment in biological activity. In particular, the K533A mutant was significantly reduced in its catalytic activity toward Rac, Cdc42, and RhoA in vitro, while the K538A and V568E mutants showed decreased activity toward RhoA alone. Despite this difference, all three showed comparable, modest reductions in transforming activity. Thus, while our results indicate that the Vav2 CRD is involved in mediating DH domain catalytic activity, by analogy to the CRD of Raf-1, we also suggest that the Vav2 CRD may also facilitate interaction with other molecules that can influence DH domain function in vivo.
Movilla and Bustelo observed that the CRD of Vav3 could bind to its GTPase substrates in vitro and suggested that the CRD may facilitate DH domain interaction with its substrates (28). Our observation that mutation of the CRD impaired Vav2 catalytic activities in vitro is also consistent with this observation. Therefore, experiments to determine if the Vav2 CRD mutants are deficient in substrate binding would help elucidate the exact residues that may be important for specific GTPase recognition or other protein ligands that are required for complete catalytic activation.
Another possible role for the CRD of Vav2 may be to serve as a lipid binding, membrane-targeting sequence. The tandem CRDs from various PKC isoforms have been shown to promote translocation to the plasma membrane upon interaction with diacylglycerol and phorbol ester (19). Although the CRD of Vav2 does not bind phorbol esters, it may function to target Vav2 to the plasma membrane by interacting with membrane-associated phospholipids or other protein ligands. However, specific mutations in the CRD (K533A, K538A, and V568E) that impaired Vav2 function did not cause a significant alteration in membrane association. Furthermore, we found that the loss of function due to mutation of the CRD of Vav could not be corrected by addition of a plasma membrane-targeting sequence (Palmby et al., submitted). Thus, it seems unlikely that the CRD facilitates the membrane association of Vav or Vav2. Studies to determine if the CRD mutants can interact with the 14-3-3 adapter protein or with other cellular proteins would help determine whether the CRD serves as a protein interaction domain, analogous to the Raf-1 kinase.
Finally, previous studies suggest that the products of PI3K, such as PIP3, can associate with the PH domains of Vav and Sos to promote the activation of these Dbl family proteins in vitro and in vivo (18, 29). Our in vitro exchange analyses showed that the K407A PH domain mutant, which is expected to be impaired in phosphoinositide binding, retained strong catalytic activity. Thus, we anticipated that products of PI3K would not enhance Vav2 activity in vivo. However, we found that PI3K activation synergistically stimulated Vav2 transforming and signaling activity. Since expression of PI3K with Vav2 resulted in enhanced formation of GTP-bound Rac1, this indicates that PI3K products may enhance the intrinsic catalytic activity of the DH domain in vivo. Thus, our results are consistent with the observations of Han and colleagues, who propose that PIP3 association with the PH domain enhances the intrinsic catalytic activity of the DH domain of Vav (18).
Interestingly, the PI3K modulation of biological activity was independent of membrane association, as our fractionation analyses showed no difference in subcellular localization of the Vav2-DPC fragment in the presence of a constitutively activated PI3K. According to previous studies (21), in order to promote a PI3K-mediated membrane targeting event, PI3K products must exhibit high-affinity binding and have at least a 25-fold-higher affinity for PIP3 than for PIP2 for a PH domain to function as a PI3K-stimulated membrane-targeting domain, such as the PH domain of Akt. Therefore, our observation that PI3K activation enhanced Vav2 activity in vivo independent of promoting plasma membrane association was not surprising. Our observations argue that the PH domain will only facilitate membrane association by cooperating with other membrane-targeting domains. This mechanism is illustrated by findings that efficient recruitment of the ß-adrenergic receptor kinase (ßARK) to membranes requires the cooperative binding of the COOH terminus of ßARK to Gß
subunits and of the PH domain of ßARK to PIP2 (31). Additionally, we found that, unlike the PH domain of the Akt serine/threonine kinase, the isolated PH domain of Vav did not show PI3K activation-mediated association with the plasma membrane (T. Palmby and C. J. Der, unpublished data). Thus, Vav2 catalytic activity and function, but not subcellular location, appear to be positively modulated by activation of PI3K, and this enhanced activity requires intact CRD and PH domains.
In summary, our observations show that, unlike other Dbl family members, Vav2 requires both a PH domain and a CRD in addition to its catalytic DH domain to transform NIH 3T3 cells. Our studies further demonstrate that PI3K lipid second messengers synergistically enhance Vav2 transforming and signaling activity in the context of Vav2-DPC but have no effect on polypeptides harboring missense mutations in either the PH domain or the CRD. Finally, these analyses suggest the both the PH domain and the CRD contribute a second essential function independent of membrane association in order to facilitate guanine exchange activity of the DH domain and that this function may encompass binding to other protein or lipid ligands.
Our research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to C.J.D. (CA55008 and CA63071) and S.L.C. (CA84480-01A1), and M.A.B. was supported by an NIH training grant fellowship and by a Leukemia & Lymphoma Society postdoctoral fellowship.
|
|
|---|
, a Rac guanosine exchange factor, and Rac. Mol. Cell Biol. 18:4744-4751.
. J. Biol. Chem. 269:2961-2970.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»