Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2002, p. 2544-2555, Vol. 22, No. 8
0270-7306/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.22.8.2544-2555.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington 98105,1 Department of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada,2 Laboratory of Structural Cellular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 100213
Received 3 October 2001/ Returned for modification 5 November 2001/ Accepted 15 January 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30 proteins, or nucleoporins, which are present in multiple copies to yield an
50-MDa complex. The numbers of nucleoporins in humans and other vertebrate species are not known, but in these cells the NPCs appear more elaborate and have estimated masses of over 100 MDa. The structural organization of NPCs, and indeed many nucleoporins, are highly conserved from yeast to mammals (54, 67). In all species examined, nucleoporins can be divided into two broad categories: those that contain degenerate repeats of dipeptide FG and those that do not.
These FG repeat-containing nucleoporins have been shown to interact with a class of soluble factors termed karyopherins or kaps. Proteins and other macromolecules are directed across the nuclear envelope by the presence of specific nuclear localization signals (NLSs) (11) or nuclear export signals (NESs) (16, 19); karyopherins (kaps) bind to the NLSs and NESs of proteins and RNAs in the cytoplasm or nucleoplasm and mediate their translocation across the NPC. Karyopherins fall into two structurally related families: the ß-karyopherin and the
-karyopherin protein families (reviewed in references 21, 41, 47, and 69). There are 14 ß-kaps and only one
-kap represented in yeast, but in higher eukaryotes the families appear to be larger. To date, the general rule for kap cargo function suggests that ß-kaps interact directly with their cognate cargoes and escort them across the NPC. The exception to this comes from the first import pathway characterized. In this case, classical NLS (cNLS)-containing substrates are recognized by kap
(Kap60p/Srp1p in yeast), which in turn is bound to kap ß1 (Kap95p in yeast), and this complex mediates nuclear import. Thus it appears that kap
functions as an adapter for kap ß1 (15, 20, 47, 49). In yeast, the ß-karyopherin family includes 11 kaps that function as import receptors, 3 export kaps, and 1 kap that functions as both an import and export receptor (70). Surprisingly, only four of these karyopherins are essential, despite the fact that nonessential karyopherins transport cargoes essential for cell viability, suggesting considerable cross talk between the various transport pathways.
The soluble factor Ran is a small GTPase, believed to be a key regulator that provides directionality to nucleocytoplasmic transport, in part by regulating the formation of kap/cargo complexes (reviewed in references 6, 21, 42, 54, and 67). Two forms of Ran exist in the cell, a GTP-bound form and a GDP-bound form. The cytoplasmic localization of the Ran GTPase-activating protein (RanGAP) and the nuclear localization of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RanGEF) are believed to create a Ran-GDP/Ran-GTP gradient across the nuclear envelope, which appears to control the association and dissociation of kap/cargo complexes. For example, import kap/cargo complexes form in the cytoplasm. Once they traverse the NPC and encounter the high concentration of Ran-GTP in the nuclear environment, Ran-GTP binds the kap, stimulating complex dissociation and cargo release (51). In contrast, export complexes comprising the kap, its cargo, and Ran-GTP are formed cooperatively in the nucleus (18, 33), and these complexes are disrupted once they reach the cytoplasm, where RanGAP induces GTP hydrolysis (17, 31, 33). Other soluble factors such as Yrb1p (58), Yrb2p (64), and Nup2p (9, 10) appear to act as coactivators of the Ran cycle and aid in controlling the interaction of Ran with karyopherins and the NPC.
Ste12p is a transcription factor that plays a central role in a signaling pathway from the plasma membrane to the nucleus, which promotes yeast either to mate or to become filamentous, change their budding pattern, and invade solid substrates such as agar. Although the outcome depends on the cell type and the stimuli they receive, in either case, some of the same signaling elements are involved (Ste20p, Ste11p, and Ste7p), and both signal transduction pathways terminate in the phosphorylation and activation of Ste12p (13, 14, 22, 35, 46, 52). In the mating response, Ste12p forms a homomultimer, which binds to pheromone response elements (PREs) found upstream of genes required during mating (23, 26), inducing their transcription and triggering a number of cellular responses, which include polarized growth (or shmooing), cell cycle arrest in G1, and increased expression of proteins required for cell and nuclear fusion. In contrast, in the filamentous or pseudohyphal and invasive-growth transitions, activated Ste12p forms a heterodimer with a second transcription factor, Tec1p (39, 44). This protein complex then interacts with promoters containing PREs in close proximity to Tec1p binding sites (collectively termed filamentation/invasion response elements), and this induces the transcription of genes required for filamentous and invasive growth.
In this study we identify Ste12p as a nuclear import cargo for Kap121p. Kap121p is an essential member of the yeast ß-karyopherin family. We show that KAP121 mutants are defective for mating responses and cellular differentiation. Furthermore, we use new temperature-sensitive alleles of kap121, as well as overlay assays, in vitro binding assays, and in vivo fluorescence localization studies, to characterize the role of Kap121p in Ste12p import into the nucleus.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ura3-52/ura3-52 his3
200/his3
200 trp1-1/trp1-1 leu2-3,112/leu2-3,112 lys2-801/lys2-801). KAP121 strains are derivatives of DF5 and were produced as follows. The entire KAP121 open reading frame (ORF) was replaced on one chromosome in DF5 diploid cells by direct integration of a PCR product containing the URA3 gene. Correct integration was confirmed by PCR (2). For selection purposes, URA3 was then replaced with HIS3 (7). The KAP121 gene including 1,000 nucleotides upstream and downstream of the ORF was cloned into pRS316 and pRS314 to yield KAP121-URA3 and KAP121-TRP1, respectively. pKAP121-URA3 was transformed into diploid DF5 cells carrying one disrupted copy of KAP121 (kap121::ura3::HIS3). The diploids were sporulated, tetrads were dissected, and kap121::ura3::HIS3/pKAP121-URA3 haploids were selected and termed kap121
/pKAP121-URA3. The STE12 ORF was amplified by PCR from yeast genomic DNA and cloned into the EcoRI and HindIII sites of pYX242 (53), and the resulting recombinant plasmid was termed pSte12-GFP. STE12 gene fragments (nucleotides 1 to 759, 760 to 1485, and 1486 to 2064) were produced by PCR using oligonucleotides containing either a single EcoRI restriction site or both EcoRI and HindIII restriction sites at their 5' ends. These PCR fragments were cloned into the EcoRI site of pGEX-4T-3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and the resulting recombinants were termed pGST-Ste12p (aa1-252), pGST-Ste12p (aa253-493), and pGST-Ste12p (aa494-688), respectively. The same PCR fragments of the STE12 gene were also cloned into the EcoRI and HindIII sites of p12-GFP2-NLS (pKW431; a gift from K. Weis, University of California, San Francisco) (62). In each case, this resulted in the removal of the cNLS encoded by the p12-GFP-NLS plasmid, replacing it with the STE12 coding sequence in frame with a mutant (p12) NES followed by two green fluorescent protein (GFP) coding sequences. The resulting recombinant plasmids were termed pSte12p (aa1-252)-GFP, pSte12p (aa253-493)-GFP, and pSte12p (aa494-688)-GFP. Multicopy plasmid pRS426-STE12 was constructed by PCR amplification of the STE12 gene, including 500 nucleotides upstream and downstream of the ORF, from yeast genomic DNA and ligation of the fragment into the HindIII and XhoI sites of pRS426. The STE12-cNLS fusion was produced by PCR amplification of the STE12 gene, including 500 nucleotides upstream of the ORF, and an in frame fusion on the simian virus 40 (SV40) large T antigen NLS coding sequence (29) at its 3' end. This PCR fragment was cloned into the HindIII and EcoRI sites of pRS316.
Construction of the temperature-sensitive alleles.
kap121 mutants were made by the gapped plasmid repair method (45). Briefly, the KAP121 gene was amplified under mutagenic-PCR conditions (100 µM dGTP, 100 µM dCTP, 100 µM dTTP, 5 µM dATP) and cotransformed in a 10:1 ratio with the pKAP121-TRP1 plasmid (which had been digested with BalI and NdeI and gel purified to remove nucleotides 1 to 2392 of the KAP121 ORF) into kap121
/pKAP121-URA3 cells. The transformants were plated on SC-Ura-Trp (synthetic complete medium minus uracil and tryptophan) and incubated at 23°C. Colonies were replica plated to 5-fluoroorotic acid-containing medium (3) and incubated at 23 and 37°C to select cells lacking pKAP121-URA3. Mutants that grew at 23°C but not at 37°C were characterized further. Temperature-sensitive colonies were replica plated to YEPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose) and incubated at 23 and 37°C to confirm that the temperature-sensitive phenotype was not the result of nutritional requirements. Finally, mutants were tested for their ability to be complemented with a wild-type copy of KAP121. Colonies that fulfilled all of these requirements were classified as kap121 temperature-sensitive strains, and the plasmids containing the temperature-sensitive kap121 alleles were isolated and termed pkap121-18, pkap121-26, pkap121-34, and pkap121-41.
The kap95-14 temperature-sensitive strain is a derivative of DF5 and was produced as previously described (1).
Overlay blot assay. Yeast nuclei were prepared as previously described (56). The proteins were denatured in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and fractionated by hydroxyapatite (HA) high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Pooled column fractions were further separated by standard formic acid HPLC separation (56, 68). The proteins in each of the resulting column fractions were concentrated by trichloroacetic acid precipitation. Aliquots were then separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked and probed with cytosolic fractions isolated from yeast cells expressing protein A (pA)-tagged Kap121p and Kap123p as previously described (1, 57). Karyopherin-interacting proteins were identified by mass spectrometry as described previously (48, 55)
Recombinant-protein preparation. Glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins were expressed separately in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)(pLYS-S) (Novagen, Madison, Wis.). Overnight cultures were diluted and grown for 30 min at 37°C. The cells were induced to express the GST fusions by incubation at 37°C in 2 mM IPTG (isopropyl-1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside) for an additional 5 h. Cells were harvested, washed with water, and flash frozen in a dry ice-ethanol bath. The cell pellets were resuspended in STE (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1 mM EDTA)-1% Triton X-100 containing 1/100 solution P (0.4 mg of pepstatin A/ml, 18 mg of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride/ml [1]) and lysed by sonication. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 17,500 x g for 15 min at 4°C and stored at -80°C in 1-ml aliquots.
Ran preparation. Yeast Ran (Gsp1p) was expressed as a GST fusion in E. coli as described above. A 1-ml aliquot of the resulting protein lysate was thawed on ice and incubated with 200 µl of glutathione (GT) resin (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 h at 4°C with rotation. Beads were pelleted by centrifugation and washed four times with binding buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 6.8], 2 mM magnesium acetate, 150 mM potassium acetate [KOAc]). Ran was cleaved from the column with 0.3 U of thrombin (Sigma) at room temperature for 30 min with rotation, and 1 U of hirudin (Sigma) was then added to inhibit the thrombin. The cleaved Ran was collected through a microcentrifuge spin column, cleared of any residual GST proteins via incubation with 20 µl of fresh GT resin at 4°C for 30 min, and collected a second time through a fresh column. Purified Ran was then loaded with either GTP or GDP as described previously (51) and stored at -80°C.
In vitro binding assays. (i) Protein purification and binding. Protein lysates, produced as described above, were thawed, adsorbed to GT resin as described above, washed three times with transport buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.4], 110 mM KOAc, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 µM CaCl2, 1 µM ZnCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% Tween 20), once with transport buffer plus 500 mM NaCl, and three times with transport buffer. Kap121p was removed from the GT resin via incubation with 0.1 U of thrombin (Sigma) overnight at room temperature, and 1 U of hirudin (Sigma) was then added to inhibit the thrombin. Cleaved Kap121p was collected through a microcentrifuge spin column and cleared of any remaining GST-containing proteins as described above.
For in vitro binding reactions involving two proteins, the initial binding and purification steps were carried out as described above. Purified Kap121p was incubated with immobilized GST-Ste12p fusion proteins for 1 h at 4°C with rotation. Samples were centrifuged, and the unbound protein fractions were prepared for SDS-PAGE. The bound protein complexes were washed as described above and prepared for SDS-PAGE. SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining were then used to analyze equal amounts of both the unbound and bound fractions.
(ii) Ran release. Protein complexes were formed as described above and separated into aliquots. Ran-GTP, Ran-GDP, or GTP-loading buffer alone was added, and complexes were incubated with rotation at room temperature for 30 min. Unbound protein fractions were collected and prepared for SDS-PAGE. The bound protein complexes were washed three times with transport buffer and released from the beads by incubation with SDS-PAGE buffer. Proteins in the bound and unbound fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie blue staining. Kap121p present in the gel was quantified with ImageQuant as previously described (34). The amounts of Kap121p present in both the unbound and bound fractions were determined, and the Kap121p released from the complex was represented graphically as a percentage of total Kap121p (released Kap121p/[released Kap121p + bound Kap121p]) x 100%).
Microscopy. Wild-type and mutant cells expressing GFP-tagged proteins were grown in selection media, and the GFP chimeras were visualized directly by fluorescence microscopy with a Zeiss Axioskop 2. Images were captured with a Spot camera (Diagnostic Instruments Inc., Sterling Heights, Mich.). Where temperature shifts were required, cultures were grown to mid-logarithmic phase at 23°C and then shifted to a 30 or 37°C water bath for 3 h and maintained at this temperature on a heated microscope stage during examination.
Immunopurification studies and immunoblotting procedures. Aliquots of the GST-Ste12p (aa1-252), GST-Ste12p (aa253-493), and GST-Ste12p (aa494-688) bacterial lysates were thawed on ice and incubated with 200 µl of GT-Sepharose resin (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 h at 4°C with rotation. The beads were washed three times with transport buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.4], 110 mM KOAc, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 µM CaCl2, 1 µM ZnCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1% Tween 20, 1/1,000 solution P [1]), once with transport buffer plus 500 mM NaCl, and three times with transport buffer. Cleared whole-cell lysates from yeast strains expressing Kap95-pA (1, 57), Kap104-pA (1), Kap121-pA (57), and Kap123-pA (57), prepared as described previously (40), were incubated with the immobilized GST chimeras overnight at 4°C with rotation. The immobilized protein complexes were washed extensively with wash buffer (150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween 20, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1:1,000 solution P) and successively with wash buffer containing 500 mM, 1 M, and 2 M MgCl2 and finally with 0.5 M acetic acid. The proteins in each fraction were then precipitated with trichloroacetic acid and prepared for SDS-PAGE. Protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue or transferred to nitrocellulose and blocked with 5% skim milk (1). pA-tagged fusions were detected with rabbit immunoglobulin B (IgG; Cappel) and visualized with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and enhanced chemiluminescence.
fus1-LACZ assays.
DF5 mata and kap121-34 mata cells were transformed with pSB234 (66). These cells were grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.200, and the cultures were separated into aliquots, treated with 5 µM
-factor, and incubated at 23, 30, or 37°C. Samples were taken at various intervals after pheromone treatment, divided in half, and prepared for Western blot analysis or ß-galactosidase activity assays. For Western blot analysis whole-cell protein lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and blocked with 5% skim milk (1). The ß-galactosidase fusion and Gsp1p were detected with monoclonal anti-ß-galactosidase (57) and anti-Gsp1p, respectively, and visualized as described above. The ß-galactosidase activity assays were preformed as described in the Matchmaker 2-Hybrid manual (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.). Briefly, the OD600 of each culture was determined, and the cells were harvested, washed with Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4) (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.), and resuspended in 100 µl of Z buffer. The cells were lysed by flash freezing in liquid nitrogen and quick thawing in a 37°C water bath three times. Then 700 µl of 0.27% ß-mercaptoethanol and 0.56 mg of o-nitrophenyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside were added to each sample. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 30°C for 3 min, reactions were stopped by the addition of 400 µl of Na2CO3, mixtures were centrifuged, and the OD420 of each sample was determined. Units of ß-galactosidase activity were calculated with the following formula: 1,000 x OD420 of centrifuged reaction mixture/(OD600 of culture x volume of culture x minutes of assay) (66).
Quantitative mating assay. Quantitative mating assays were performed as previously described (61). Briefly, mid-logarithmic cultures of the strains to be tested and wild-type tester strains were grown at 23°C in selective or rich media. Culture concentrations were determined, and 2 x 106 cells of the strain to be tested were mixed with 107 cells of the wild-type tester strain. These mixtures were incubated at 30°C for 5 h and plated in a 1:1,000 dilution onto selective media to select for diploids. To determine the number of viable haploid cells of the strain being tested, the mating mixtures were also plated in a 1:1,000 dilution onto selective media to select for these haploids. The resulting haploid and diploid colonies were counted. Mating efficiency was expressed as a percentage of the input haploids of the strain being tested that formed diploid colonies (32).
Invasion assay.
To obtain invasion-competent strains with which to assay the role of KAP121 kap121-ts/pKAP121-URA3, haploids were crossed with SK1 (mat
) (37), an invasion-competent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. The resulting diploids were sporulated, and tetrads were dissected. The segregants were patched on SC-His-Ura, SC-His-Trp, and SC-His-Ura-Trp plates to identify strains containing pKAP121-URA3 as the only copy of KAP121. To determine which of these haploid strains were invasion competent, the cells were patched to YEPD plates with a toothpick and incubated at 30°C for 2 days and then the plates were washed with a gentle stream of deionized water to rinse cells from the agar surface, revealing cells that had invaded the agar (52). Four haploid strains, termed 121INV1-4, were identified. 121INV1 cells were then transformed with kap121 temperature-sensitive alleles on TRP1-based plasmids pkap121-18, pkap121-34, and pkap121-41. These transformants were then replica plated to 5-fluoroorotic acid-containing media to select for cells that had lost the wild-type KAP121-containing plasmid (pKAP121-URA3), yielding (otherwise) isogenic strains containing the temperature-sensitive allele of kap121 as the only copy of KAP121 (121INV1-kap121-18, 121INV1-kap121-34, and 121INV1-kap121-41). 121INV1-kap121-34 cells were also transformed with pRS426-STE12 and pRS316-STE12cNLS.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The C-terminal fragment of Ste12p interacts specifically with Kap121p. Previous studies suggest that the Kap121p and Kap123p transport pathways overlap and are capable of mediating the nuclear import of some common substrates (24, 57). To investigate the specific role that Kap121p plays in the nuclear import of Ste12p, immunopurification studies were used to determine whether recombinant, E. coli-expressed, GST-Ste12p fusion proteins could interact with other ß-karyopherins. Each GST-Ste12p chimera was immobilized on GT-Sepharose and incubated with lysates derived from yeast strains expressing pA-tagged copies of Kap95p, Kap104p, Kap121p, and Kap123p. Bound proteins were eluted from the column with increasing concentrations of MgCl2 and then with 0.5 M acetic acid. Coomassie blue staining and immunoblotting (Fig. 5) demonstrated that of the four karyopherins tested, the C terminus of Ste12p was enriched only with Kap121p. Together, the immunopurification data and the overlay blot analysis provided complementary evidence that Kap121p interacts specifically with Ste12p through the NLS-containing C-terminal fragment of the protein.
|
|
-factor in kap121-34 mata and wild-type mata cells. In both strains, ß-galactosidase activity peaked at 3 h after pheromone treatment, but at all temperatures tested kap121-34 cells displayed significantly less activity than wild-type cells and this was more pronounced at 37°C (Fig. 7). It should also be noted that the overall enzymatic activity was decreased in both wild-type and mutant cells at 37°C. The reasons for this are unclear, but this may partially explain a poor mating efficiency of even wild-type cells at 37°C (50) (data not shown).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here, we have focused on beginning to disentangle the web of interactions for a typical karyopherin, Kap121p. The transport pathway mediated by Kap121p heavily overlaps with that mediated by its closest relative, Kap123p. Both proteins import ribosomal proteins into the nucleus (57). However each also appears to have its own set of cargoes. For example, Kap121p appears to specifically import Pho4p (28), Pdr1p (8), and Spo12p (4), transcription factors that regulate phosphate homeostasis, multidrug resistance, and sporulation, respectively.
We sought to further characterize Kap121p by making new kap121 temperature-sensitive mutants and characterizing the phenotypes associated with them and, in parallel, attempting to comprehensively identify many potential Kap121p cargoes by overlay assays of nuclear proteins. One particularly interesting set of phenotypes associated with kap121 cells that we observed were defects in both the mating response and the transition to the pseudohyphal invasive form. While these two, apparently distinct, differentiation programs arise from different external stimuli and utilize different mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways to convey their signals to the nucleus, the pathways share some signaling elements and converge on a single nuclear transcription factor, Ste12p (22, 35, 52), a protein also identified as specifically interacting with Kap121p in our overlay assays. Depending on the MAP kinase pathway activated, the differential phosphorylation of Ste12p, and its interaction with partners, different transcriptional programs are activated, inducing either the mating response or pseudohyphal differentiation and invasive growth. Indeed, on the basis of our current knowledge, Ste12p is unique among known nuclear proteins in that its mislocalization could specifically disable both of these differentiation programs.
We thus tested if the nuclear import of Ste12p was dependent on Kap121p. Analysis of Ste12p-GFP chimeras demonstrated that Ste12p was not efficiently imported into nuclei of kap121 cells and remained cytoplasmic at the nonpermissive temperature. However, when a functional copy of KAP121 was added back to these cells, apparently normal Ste12p import was restored. Other transport pathways in these cells were not directly affected, establishing that the Kap121p transport pathway specifically affected the mislocalization of Ste12p. Furthermore, although Kap121p function has previously been shown to overlap with that of Kap123p, in agreement with our overlay assays, immunopurification studies suggest that Ste12p does not interact with Kap123p or other ß-karyopherins tested in this study.
Using in vitro binding studies we demonstrated that, like most other ß-karyopherins, Kap121p interacts directly with its cargo, Ste12p. In vivo fluorescence localization studies combined with in vitro binding studies determined that the C-terminal amino acids 494 to 688 of Ste12p contain this Kap121p-specific NLS. The previously identified NLS sequences of Kap121p cargoes are basic in nature but fail to bear any other notable similarities (4, 8, 25, 28, 43, 57). Furthermore, some of these experiments have found exceptionally large karyopherin-interacting NLS domains, suggesting that the similarity in NLSs recognized by Kap121p lies, in part, in the secondary structure. Although we have not fully defined which residues are necessary and sufficient for Ste12p NLS function, amino acid sequence alignments between the previously characterized Kap121p-interacting NLS of Pho4p and full-length Ste12p identified two short sequences within this C-terminal region of Ste12p and a larger sequence containing a gap that show similarity to the Pho4p NLS. However, only mutational and structural analysis of Ste12p will fully illustrate which residues in this C-terminal fragment constitute the minimal NLS and are required for Kap121p interaction. Furthermore, these results do not rule out the possibility that additional amino acid residues, perhaps outside of the C-terminal fragment, contribute to efficient Ste12p nuclear import and/or retention.
A role for Kap121p in Ste12p import suggests that an inability to efficiently import Ste12p in kap121 cells is the primary cause of the observed mating and invasive-growth defects. Indeed, expression of a Ste12p-dependent reporter in kap121 cells was compromised. Moreover, expression of a STE12-cNLS fusion or overexpression of STE12 in the kap121-34 strain suppressed both phenotypic defects. Together, these data suggest that, although other Kap121p cargoes are mislocalized in kap121-34 cells, the phenotypes we observed under these conditions are linked directly to Ste12p.
Here we have presented data demonstrating that Kap121p imports Ste12p into the nucleus and that kap121 mutants disrupt Ste12p function, thereby blocking the Ste12p-induced transcription and the differentiation pathways mediated by Ste12p. This work underscores the validity of our parallel approaches and provides a framework for future studies aimed at linking phenotypes associated with kap mutants to their transport cargoes. However, it is also apparent from our results that our ability to unravel the complexities of nuclear transport requires a comprehensive inventory of kap-cargo interactions. We are currently exploring methods to define these interactions.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are greatly indebted to Brian Chait and Wenzhu Zhang for mass spectrometric analysis and Ben Timney for supplying us with the Rpl25NLS-GFP fusion. We also thank Dwayne Weber for expert technical assistance; Patrick Lusk, Marcello Marelli, David Dilworth, and Tim Galitski for critical reading of the manuscript; and other members of the Aitchison and Wozniak labs for helpful discussions.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Aitchison, J. D., M. P. Rout, M. Marelli, G. Blobel, and R. W. Wozniak. 1995. Two novel related yeast nucleoporins Nup170p and Nup157p: complementation with the vertebrate homologue Nup155p and functional interactions with the yeast nuclear pore-membrane protein Pom152p. J. Cell Biol. 131:1133-1148.
3. Boeke, J. D., F. LaCroute, and G. R. Fink. 1984. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidine-5'-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol. Gen. Genet. 197:345-346.[CrossRef][Medline]
4.
Chaves, S. R., and G. Blobel. 2001. Nuclear import of Spo12p, a protein essential for meiosis. J. Biol. Chem. 276:17712-17717.
5. Clarke, P. R., and C. Zhang. 2001. Ran GTPase: a master regulator of nuclear structure and function during the eukaryotic cell division cycle? Trends Cell Biol. 11:366-371.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Cole, C. N., and C. M. Hammell. 1998. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: driving and directing transport. Curr. Biol. 8:R368-R372.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Cross, F. R. 1997. 'Marker swap' plasmids: convenient tools for budding yeast molecular genetics. Yeast 13:647-653.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Delahodde, A., R. Pandjaitan, M. Corral-Debrinski, and C. Jacq. 2001. Pse1/Kap121-dependent nuclear localization of the major yeast multidrug resistance (MDR) transcription factor Pdr1. Mol. Microbiol. 39:304-312.[CrossRef][Medline]
9.
Denning, D., B. Mykytka, N. P. Allen, L. Huang, B. Al, and M. Rexach. 2001. The nucleoporin Nup60p functions as a Gsp1p-GTP-sensitive tether for Nup2p at the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 154:937-950.
10.
Dilworth, D. J., A. Suprapto, J. C. Padovan, B. T. Chait, R. W. Wozniak, M. P. Rout, and J. D. Aitchison. 2001. Nup2p dynamically associates with the distal regions of the yeast nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 153:1465-1478.
11. Dingwall, C., and R. A. Laskey. 1991. Nuclear targeting sequences--a consensus? Trends Biochem. Sci. 16:478-481.[CrossRef][Medline]
12.
Dolan, J. W., and S. Fields. 1990. Overproduction of the yeast STE12 protein leads to constitutive transcriptional induction. Genes Dev. 4:492-502.
13. Elion, E. A. 2000. Pheromone response, mating and cell biology. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:573-581.[CrossRef][Medline]
14.
Elion, E. A. 1998. Routing MAP kinase cascades. Science 281:1625-1626.
15.
Enenkel, C., G. Blobel, and M. Rexach. 1995. Identification of a yeast karyopherin heterodimer that targets import substrate to mammalian nuclear pore complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 270:16499-16502.
16. Fischer, U., M. Michael, R. Luhrmann, and G. Dreyfuss. 1996. Signal-mediated nuclear export pathways of proteins and RNAs. Trends Cell Biol. 6:290-293.
17.
Floer, M., G. Blobel, and M. Rexach. 1997. Disassembly of RanGTP-karyopherin beta complex, an intermediate in nuclear protein import. J. Biol. Chem. 272:19538-19546.
18. Fornerod, M., M. Ohno, M. Yoshida, and I. W. Mattaj. 1997. CRM1 is an export receptor for leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Cell 90:1051-1060.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Gerace, L. 1995. Nuclear export signals and the fast track to the cytoplasm. Cell 82:341-344.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Gorlich, D., S. Kostka, R. Kraft, C. Dingwall, R. A. Laskey, E. Hartmann, and S. Prehn. 1995. Two different subunits of importin cooperate to recognize nuclear localization signals and bind them to the nuclear envelope. Curr. Biol. 5:383-392.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Gorlich, D., and U. Kutay. 1999. Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15:607-660.[CrossRef][Medline]
22.
Gustin, M. C., J. Albertyn, M. Alexander, and K. Davenport. 1998. MAP kinase pathways in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:1264-1300.
23.
Hagen, D. C., G. McCaffrey, and G. F. Sprague, Jr. 1991. Pheromone response elements are necessary and sufficient for basal and pheromone-induced transcription of the FUS1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:2952-2961.
24.
Isoyama, T., A. Murayama, A. Nomoto, and S. Kuge. 2001. Nuclear import of the yeast AP-1-like transcription factor Yap1p is mediated by transport receptor Pse1p, and this import step is not affected by oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 276:21863-21869.
25. Izaurralde, E., U. Kutay, C. von Kobbe, I. W. Mattaj, and D. Gorlich. 1997. The asymmetric distribution of the constituents of the Ran system is essential for transport into and out of the nucleus. EMBO J. 16:6535-6547.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Johnson, A. D. 1995. Molecular mechanisms of cell-type determination in budding yeast. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 5:552-558.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Kaffman, A., and E. K. O'Shea. 1999. Regulation of nuclear localization: a key to a door. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15:291-339.[CrossRef][Medline]
28.
Kaffman, A., N. M. Rank, and E. K. O'Shea. 1998. Phosphorylation regulates association of the transcription factor Pho4 with its import receptor Pse1/Kap121. Genes Dev. 12:2673-2683.
29. Kalderon, D., B. L. Roberts, W. D. Richardson, and A. E. Smith. 1984. A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location. Cell 39:499-509.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Karin, M., and T. Hunter. 1995. Transcriptional control by protein phosphorylation: signal transmission from the cell surface to the nucleus. Curr. Biol. 5:747-757.[CrossRef][Medline]
31.
Kehlenbach, R. H., A. Dickmanns, A. Kehlenbach, T. Guan, and L. Gerace. 1999. A role for RanBP1 in the release of CRM1 from the nuclear pore complex in a terminal step of nuclear export. J. Cell Biol. 145:645-657.
32.
Kunzler, M., J. Trueheart, C. Sette, E. Hurt, and J. Thorner. 2001. Mutations in the YRB1 gene encoding yeast ran-binding-protein-1 that impair nucleocytoplasmic transport and suppress yeast mating defects. Genetics 157:1089-1105.
33. Kutay, U., F. R. Bischoff, S. Kostka, R. Kraft, and D. Gorlich. 1997. Export of importin alpha from the nucleus is mediated by a specific nuclear transport factor. Cell 90:1061-1071.[CrossRef][Medline]
34.
Lee, D. C., and J. D. Aitchison. 1999. Kap104p-mediated nuclear import. Nuclear localization signals in mRNA-binding proteins and the role of Ran and RNA. J. Biol. Chem. 274:29031-29037.
35.
Liu, H., C. A. Styles, and G. R. Fink. 1993. Elements of the yeast pheromone response pathway required for filamentous growth of diploids. Science 262:1741-1744.
36. Lorenz, M. C., and J. Heitman. 1997. Yeast pseudohyphal growth is regulated by GPA2, a G protein alpha homolog. EMBO J. 16:7008-7018.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Lydall, D., Y. Nikolsky, D. K. Bishop, and T. Weinert. 1996. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature 383:840-843.[CrossRef][Medline]
38.
Macara, I. G. 2001. Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65:570-594.
39.
Madhani, H. D., and G. R. Fink. 1997. Combinatorial control required for the specificity of yeast MAPK signaling. Science 275:1314-1317.
40.
Marelli, M., J. D. Aitchison, and R. W. Wozniak. 1998. Specific binding of the karyopherin kap121p to a subunit of the nuclear pore complex containing nup53p, nup59p, and nup170p. J. Cell Biol. 143:1813-1830.
40.
Marelli, M., C. P. Lusk, H. Chan, J. D. Aitchison, and R. W. Wozniak. 2001. A link between the synthesis of nucleoporins and the biogenesis of the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Biol. 153:709-724.
41. Mattaj, I. W., and L. Englmeier. 1998. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: the soluble phase. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:265-306.[CrossRef][Medline]
42.
Moore, M. S. 1998. Ran and nuclear transport. J. Biol. Chem. 273:22857-22860.
43.
Mosammaparast, N., K. R. Jackson, Y. Guo, C. J. Brame, J. Shabanowitz, D. F. Hunt, and L. F. Pemberton. 2001. Nuclear import of histone H2A and H2B is mediated by a network of karyopherins. J. Cell Biol. 153:251-262.
44. Mosch, H. U., and G. R. Fink. 1997. Dissection of filamentous growth by transposon mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 145:671-684.[Abstract]
45. Muhlrad, D., R. Hunter, and R. Parker. 1992. A rapid method for localized mutagenesis of yeast genes. Yeast 8:79-82.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Pan, X., T. Harashima, and J. Heitman. 2000. Signal transduction cascades regulating pseudohyphal differentiation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3:567-572.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Pemberton, L. F., G. Blobel, and J. S. Rosenblum. 1998. Transport routes through the nuclear pore complex. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:392-399.[CrossRef][Medline]
48. Qin, J., D. Fenyo, Y. Zhao, W. W. Hall, D. M. Chao, C. J. Wilson, R. A. Young, and B. T. Chait. 1997. A strategy for rapid, high-confidence protein identification. Anal. Chem. 69:3995-4001.[Medline]
49.
Radu, A., G. Blobel, and M. S. Moore. 1995. Identification of a protein complex that is required for nuclear import and mediates docking of import substrate to distinct nucleoporins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:1769-1773.
50.
Reid, B. J., and L. H. Hartwell. 1977. Regulation of mating in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 75:355-365.
51. Rexach, M., and G. Blobel. 1995. Protein import into nuclei: association and dissociation reactions involving transport substrate, transport factors, and nucleoporins. Cell 83:683-692.[CrossRef][Medline]
52.
Roberts, R. L., and G. R. Fink. 1994. Elements of a single MAP kinase cascade in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mediate two developmental programs in the same cell type: mating and invasive growth. Genes Dev. 8:2974-2985.
53.
Rosenblum, J. S., L. F. Pemberton, N. Bonifaci, and G. Blobel. 1998. Nuclear import and the evolution of a multifunctional RNA-binding protein. J. Cell Biol. 143:887-899.
54.
Rout, M. P., and J. D. Aitchison. 2001. The nuclear pore complex as a transport machine. J. Biol. Chem. 276:16593-16596.
55.
Rout, M. P., J. D. Aitchison, A. Suprapto, K. Hjertaas, Y. Zhao, and B. T. Chait. 2000. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148:635-651.
56.
Rout, M. P., and G. Blobel. 1993. Isolation of the yeast nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 123:771-783.
57. Rout, M. P., G. Blobel, and J. D. Aitchison. 1997. A distinct nuclear import pathway used by ribosomal proteins. Cell 89:715-725.[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Schlenstedt, G., D. H. Wong, D. M. Koepp, and P. A. Silver. 1995. Mutants in a yeast Ran binding protein are defective in nuclear transport. EMBO J. 14:5367-5378.[Medline]
59. Schrick, K., B. Garvik, and L. H. Hartwell. 1997. Mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of the pheromone signal transduction pathway in the chemotropic response to pheromone. Genetics 147:19-32.[Abstract]
60.
Seedorf, M., and P. A. Silver. 1997. Importin/karyopherin protein family members required for mRNA export from the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8590-8595.
61. Sprague, G. F., Jr. 1991. Assay of yeast mating reaction. Methods Enzymol. 194:77-93.[Medline]
62. Stade, K., C. S. Ford, C. Guthrie, and K. Weis. 1997. Exportin 1 (Crm1p) is an essential nuclear export factor. Cell 90:1041-1050.[CrossRe