Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, May 2003, p. 3497-3505, Vol. 23, No. 10
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.10.3497-3505.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Mutagenesis, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540,1 Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582,3 PRESTO, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan2
Received 23 October 2002/ Returned for modification 4 December 2002/ Accepted 27 February 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is a subfamily of genes that encode different ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2) (Ubcs). On the other hand, ubiquitin ligases (E3) are varied, depending on their structures. Recently, a growing number of ubiquitin ligases (E3) has been found. A combination of specialized ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and ubiquitin ligases is responsible for highly specific recognition of the target proteins.
The timings of sequential activation and inactivation of Cdk kinases are important for regulation of the cell cycle (31). Synthesis of mitotic cyclin, association of mitotic cyclin to Cdk kinases, and phosphorylation-dephosphorylation of Cdk kinases achieve activation of mitotic Cdk kinases, whereas inactivation of the mitotic Cdk kinases is mainly achieved by degradation of mitotic cyclin (51). The mitotic cyclin/Cdc2 complex is a key regulator of mitosis (30). Activation of mitotic cyclin/Cdc2 kinase is important for initiation of mitotic events, i.e., nuclear envelope breakdown, chromosome condensation, and mitotic-spindle formation. On the other hand, degradation of mitotic cyclin is important for exit from mitosis (24, 29). Degradation of mitotic cyclin is regulated by a ubiquitin-proteasome system (28).
The ubiquitin ligase for ubiquitination of mitotic cyclin is a multicomponent ubiquitin ligase, APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome) (13, 16, 19, 39, 43). APC/C consists of at least 11 core components in budding yeast (51). APC/C activity requires a conserved subfamily of WD40 proteins called Cdc20 and Cdh1/Hct1 in budding yeast, which are fizzy and fizzy related in Drosophila and humans (22, 36, 38, 45). These proteins associate with APC/C and function as cell cycle-specific activators of APC/C. Recently, it was reported that Cdc20 and Cdh1 recognize their substrates by physically interacting with the target proteins (14, 37). The fission yeast homologues of Cdc20 and Cdh1 are Slp1 and Ste9/Srw1, respectively. Slp1 is essential for metaphase-anaphase transition and is thought to be an activator of APC/C at mitosis (25). Ste9/Srw1 is an activator of APC/C at G1 phase and is not required for the metaphase-anaphase transition (20, 46). Ste9/Srw1 associates with APC/C, and its association is regulated by phosphorylation (4, 47).
In a biochemical analysis of Xenopus and clam oocyte extracts, UBC4 and UBCx/E2-C were identified as ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes for mitotic cyclin (2, 50). Xenopus UBC4 is more processive than UBCx for ubiquitination of mitotic cyclin in a biochemical analysis (40, 50). A dominant negative form of E2-C and its human homologue UbcH10 were shown to cause mitotic arrest in mammalian cells (3, 41). Furthermore, the human and budding yeast Ubc4 proteins physically interact with a RING-H2 finger domain-containing APC/C component, Apc11, in vitro (10, 23, 40). On the other hand, human UbcH10 physically interacts with a cullin homology domain-containing APC/C component, Apc2, in vitro (40).
Fission yeast UbcP1/Ubc4, a homologue of UBC4 (Table 1), causes mitotic arrest when it is overexpressed (17). Previously, we reported that UbcP4/Ubc11, a fission yeast homologue of UBCx/E2-C, is essential for the transition of mitosis (32). Mitotic cyclin with high Cdc2 kinase activity accumulated in UbcP4/Ubc11-depleted cells. However, all of these results did not elucidate the functional difference and relationship between these two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in vivo.
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Isolation and disruption of the ubcP1+ gene. Fission yeast genomic DNA was partially digested with Sau3AI and cloned into a BamHI site of pUC119. This fission yeast genomic library was screened with a ubcP1+ cDNA fragment. The isolated DNA fragment containing the ubcP1+ gene was digested with PstI (this site is in the linker of pUC119) and EcoRI and cloned into the PstI and EcoRI sites of pUC119. This plasmid was digested with BamHI and EcoRV, and a fragment containing ubcP1+ was replaced with a fragment containing ura4+. A wild-type diploid strain was transformed with this fragment. Transformants were selected for uracil autotrophy, and gene disruption was confirmed by PCR and Southern blot analysis.
Construction of strain ubcP1-P61S. The fragment of a ubcP1+ gene in pUC119 was amplified by PCR with an M13 RV primer (TaKaRa) and primer CTGAATTCATTTTACATTTCTTTC (the EcoRI site is underlined), cloned into the EcoRI and PstI sites of pUC119, and mutagenized with primer GGTGGCTTGAATGAGTAGTCCG (the mutated nucleotide is underlined) as recommended in the TaKaRa construction manual for in vitro mutagenesis primers. The mutation was verified by sequencing. This allele was designated ubcP1-P61S. The mutagenized plasmid was digested with SnaBI, and a fragment containing ura4+ was introduced. Wild-type strain JY741 was transformed with this ubcP1-P61S::ura4+ fragment, and transformants with uracil autotrophy were selected at 25°C, duplicated to a fresh plate containing 5 µg of Phloxine B per ml, and incubated at 36°C. Temperature-sensitive strains were isolated on the basis of the red color of the colonies at 36°C. Homologous recombination was verified by Southern blotting, and a mutation was verified by sequencing. We also found that G was changed to A at position 5 in the second intron of the ubcP1-P61S gene. This mutation might have been introduced by misincorporation in the PCR process for site-directed mutagenesis.
Antibodies. Anti-Cdc13 serum was described by Osaka et al. (32). Anti-Cdc2 (PSTAIRE) antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antiubiquitin monoclonal antibody was purchased from CHEMICON International, Inc. Anti-multiubiquitinated protein monoclonal antibodies FK1 and FK2 were purchased from MBL. Anti-Ste9 antibody was a gift from Sergio Moreno.
Western blotting. The method used to prepare total protein for sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was described by Kaiser et al. (18). Protein samples were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto nitrocellulose filters. Proteins were detected by primary antibodies, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham), and ECL Western blotting detection reagent (Amersham).
Purification of ubiquitinated Cdc13-HA6His. Cells (10 optical density at 600 nm units) were disrupted in extraction buffer (8 M guanidine-HCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM imidazole) with glass beads. Extracts were clarified by microcentrifugation (15,000 x g, 10 min), and the protein concentration was determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad). One hundred microliters (50%, vol/vol) of Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) agarose (QIAGEN) was added to the 300 µg of total protein extracts. After protein binding, the Ni-NTA agarose was washed intensively with the extraction buffer and a protein buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol). Binding proteins were eluted with SDS-gel loading buffer containing 100 mM imidazole by boiling for 5 min and analyzed by Western blotting
Other methods. Flow cytometry was performed on a Becton Dickinson FACScan apparatus with propidium iodide staining of cells as described previously (32). For phenotypic analysis, cells were fixed with methanol and stained with 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The standard DNA technique used was described by Sambrook et al. (33).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ubcP1, was first grown in medium without thiamine, and then thiamine was added to the medium to repress the expression of UbcP1. About 20 h after the addition of thiamine, the
ubcP1 mutant stopped cell division (Fig. 1B). At 24 h after addition of thiamine, cells were fixed and their chromosomes were stained with DAPI (Fig. 1C). The cells exhibited abnormal mitosis with highly condensed chromosomes. About 40% of the cells had condensed chromosomes that were not separated, about 15% of the cells had condensed and displaced chromosomes, and about 10% of the cells had the cut (cell untimely tone) phenotype, in which the condensed chromosomes were disrupted by septation. The DNA content of the arrested cells was 2c (data not shown). These results indicate that ubcP1+ is required for progression of mitosis.
|
ubcP1 cells to repress the expression of UbcP1. At the indicated times after addition of thiamine, protein samples were prepared. The level of Cdc13 was analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Cdc13 serum (Fig. 2). At about 12 h after the addition of thiamine, Cdc13 began to accumulate in the UbcP1-depleted cells. The accumulation of Cdc13 began before the growth arrest (compare Fig. 1B and 2), suggesting that Cdc13 accumulation did not result from the cell cycle arrest at mitosis.
|
ubcP1 cells at 4 h after the shift to 36°C (Fig. 2A). At this time point, although the DNA content of a small number of cells remained at 2c, a significant number of strain cdc10
ubcP1 cells were arrested at the G1 phase (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that Cdc13 is stabilized in UbcP1-depleted cells even at the G1 phase. We previously reported that Cdc13 also accumulated in UbcP4-depleted cells (32). When similar synchronization experiments were done with strain cdc10
ubcP4 cells, essentially the same results were obtained when UbcP4 was depleted in G1-arrested cells (Fig. 3C and D). In these G1 cells, Cdc13 was degraded by the APC/CSte9 pathway (4, 20, 46). As previously reported, Cdc13 was stabilized when Ste9 was absent in G1-arrested cells (Fig. 3E and F) (20). These results indicate that Cdc13 is stabilized in UbcP1- or UbcP4-depleted cells at the G1 phase. Thus, we concluded that two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, UbcP1 and UbcP4, are directly required for the degradation of Cdc13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously reported that ubcP4+ is essential for progression of mitosis (32). Cdc13 accumulates in UbcP4-depleted cells. Overexpression of UbcP4 partially rescues cut9-665, a temperature-sensitive mutation in one of the APC/C components (34). Cells harboring both the ubcP4-140 and cut9-665 mutations exhibit a synergistic effect on temperature sensitivity (our unpublished data). These results suggest a functional relationship between UbcP4 and APC/C. However, we did not show that UbcP4 is directly involved in the ubiquitination of Cdc13.
Here we show that ubcP1+ is also essential for progression of mitosis. Cdc13 is stabilized in UbcP1- or UbcP4-depleted cells arrested at the G1 phase. Cdc13 degradation mediated by APC/CSte9 activity requires the functions of these two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. The patterns of ubiquitination of Cdc13 are different in the mutant cells of these two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. These results suggest that UbcP1 and UbcP4 are directly involved in the ubiquitination of Cdc13 with APC/C in a nonredundant fashion in vivo.
We show that the activity of APC/CSte9 depends on the functions of UbcP1 and UbcP4. These results indicate that these two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes function with APC/CSte9. However, Ste9/Srw1 functions as an activator of APC/C for Cdc13 ubiquitination during the G1 phase and its function is not required during the metaphase-anaphase transition (4, 20, 46, 47). On the other hand, Slp1 is thought to be an activator of APC/C for ubiquitination of Cdc13 during the mitotic transition (25). slp1-deficient cells exhibit abnormal mitosis, which resembles the phenotype of ubcP1- or ubcP4-deficient cells. We found that the functions of both UbcP1 and UbcP4 are required at mitosis in exponentially growing cells. Furthermore, we found that Cdc13 accumulated in exponentially growing asynchronous UbcP1-depleted (Fig. 2) or UbcP4-depleted (32) cells. Our findings suggest that these two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes are also required for the ubiquitination of Cdc13 by the APC/CSlp1 pathway.
What, then, is the functional difference between UbcP1 and UbcP4 in Cdc13 degradation? In both ubcP1- and ubcP4-deficient cells, polyubiquitination and degradation of Cdc13 are defective. The ubiquitin chains on Cdc13 are short in ubcP1-deficient (and ubcP4-functional) cells. This low-molecular-weight ubiquitination is achieved by the UbcP4 pathway because ubiquitinated Cdc13 is totally reduced in UbcP4-deficient cells. A possible explanation for these results is that the polyubiquitination of Cdc13 is a two-step reaction; i.e., the UbcP4 pathway initiates ubiquitination of Cdc13, and the UbcP1-pathway elongates the short ubiquitin chains on Cdc13. This idea is consistent with the finding that UBC4 is more processive than UBCx for ubiquitination of mitotic cyclin in a biochemical analysis of Xenopus oocyte extract (40, 50). In Xenopus oocyte extract, two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, UBC4 and UBCx, were found to function with ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1 and APC/C for ubiquitination of the mitotic cyclin. Furthermore, a ubiquitination reaction involving UBC4 lengthens the ubiquitin chains on mitotic cyclin more than does the reaction involving UBCx. However, in this system, only one ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, UBC4 or UBCx, is required for the ubiquitination of mitotic cyclin. In contrast, according to our findings, efficient polyubiquitination of mitotic cyclin requires both ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, UbcP1 and UbcP4, at least in fission yeast. One possible mechanism is that Cdc13 is initially ubiquitinated by a complex containing APC/C and UbcP4, ubiquitinated Cdc13 is transferred to another complex containing APC/C and UbcP1, and ubiquitin chains are elongated. Another possibility is that APC/C, UbcP4, and UbcP1 exist in the same complex. Thus, the initiation and elongation reactions are achieved by the same complex by UbcP4 and UbcP1, respectively. Whether the two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes exist in the same complex or not is unknown because we could not identify the interaction between the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and the APC/C component in vivo in fission yeast. We cannot rule out the possibility that UbcP1 interacts and functions with another ubiquitin ligase (for example, elongation E3). However, our results do not rule out the possibility that the two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes cooperate in the ubiquitination of mitotic cyclin. Another possibility is that the localizations of these two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes are different and that differently localized Cdc13 proteins differ in accessibility as well.
What is the biological significance of a two-step reaction model of the ubiquitination of mitotic cyclin? The timing of the degradation of mitotic cyclin is important for genomic stability. For example, unregulated inactivation of Cdc2 kinase in fission yeast causes overreplication (5, 12). In budding yeast, unregulated inactivation of Cdk kinase activity by overproduction of Sic1 and Rum1 also causes unregulated replication (35). In mammals, polyploidization of megakaryocytic cell lines is associated with reduced levels of cyclin B1 protein (52). Thus, tight regulation of mitotic cyclin degradation is required for the prevention of unregulated degradation of mitotic cyclin and overreplication of DNA.
In the case of securin protein Cut2, the timing of degradation is also important for accurate segregation of chromosomes (49). UbcP1 and UbcP4 may be required for the degradation of Cut2 because chromosome segregation is defective in both ubcP1- and ubcP4-deficient cells. It is important to examine whether the two ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes are also required in the ubiquitination of Cut2 as they are in the ubiquitination of Cdc13.
Budding yeast UBC4/5 and UBC11 are homologues of ubcP1+ and ubcP4+, respectively. UBC4/5- and/or UBC11-deficient strains of budding yeast did not have significant phenotypes. In these cells, mitotic cyclin Clb2 also does not stabilize (42). We suppose that this difference reflects the difference of functional redundancy of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes between budding yeast and fission yeast. It is not clear whether other organisms, such as mammals, have adopted the functional redundancy of fission yeast. However, our results strongly suggest that research related to the functions of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in fission yeast is strongly advantageous for studying the ubiquitin-proteasome system.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Part of this workk was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Aristarkhov, A., E. Eytan, A. Moghe, A. Admon, A. Hershko, and J. V. Ruderman. 1996. E2-C, a cyclin-selective ubiquitin carrier protein required for the destruction of mitotic cyclins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:4294-4299.
3. Bastians, H., L. M. Topper, G. L. Gorbsky, and J. V. Ruderman. 1999. Cell cycle-regulated proteolysis of mitotic target proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 10:3927-3941.
4. Blanco, M. A., Sanchez Diaz, A., J. M. de Prada, and S. Moreno. 2000. APCste9/srw1 promotes degradation of mitotic cyclins in G1 and is inhibited by cdc2 phosphorylation. EMBO J. 19:3945-3955.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Broek, D., R. Bartlett, K. Crawford, and P. Nurse. 1991. Involvement of p34cdc2 in establishing the dependency of S phase on mitosis. Nature 349:388-393.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Ciechanover, A. 1998. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: on protein death and cell life. EMBO J. 17:7151-7160.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Ciechanover, A., A. Orian, and A. L. Schwartz. 2000. Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis: biological regulation via destruction. Bioessays 22:442-451.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Ellison, K. S., T. Gwozd, J. A. Prendergast, M. C. Paterson, and M. J. Ellison. 1991. A site-directed approach for constructing temperature-sensitive ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes reveals a cell cycle function and growth function for RAD6. J. Biol. Chem. 266:24116-24120.
9. Fujimuro, M., H. Sawada, and H. Yokosawa. 1994. Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies specific to multi-ubiquitin chains of polyubiquitinated proteins. FEBS Lett. 349:173-180.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Gmachl, M., C. Gieffers, A. V. Podtelejnikov, M. Mann, and J. M. Peters. 2000. The RING-H2 finger protein APC11 and the E2 enzyme UBC4 are sufficient to ubiquitinate substrates of the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:8973-8978.
11. Gordon, C., G. McGurk, P. Dillon, C. Rosen, and N. D. Hastie. 1993. Defective mitosis due to a mutation in the gene for a fission yeast 26S protease subunit. Nature 366:355-357.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Hayles, J., D. Fisher, A. Woollard, and P. Nurse. 1994. Temporal order of S phase and mitosis in fission yeast is determined by the state of the p34cdc2-mitotic B cyclin complex. Cell 78:813-822.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Hershko, A., D. Ganoth, V. Sudakin, A. Dahan, L. H. Cohen, F. C. Luca, J. V. Ruderman, and E. Eytan. 1994. Components of a system that ligates cyclin to ubiquitin and their regulation by the protein kinase cdc2. J. Biol. Chem. 269:4940-4946.
14. Hilioti, Z., Y. S. Chung, Y. Mochizuki, C. F. Hardy, and O. Cohen Fix. 2001. The anaphase inhibitor Pds1 binds to the APC/C-associated protein Cdc20 in a destruction box-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 11:1347-1352.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Iacovoni, J. S., P. Russell, and F. Gaits. 1999. A new inducible protein expression system in fission yeast based on the glucose-repressed inv1 promoter. Gene 232:53-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Irniger, S., S. Piatti, C. Michaelis, and K. Nasmyth. 1995. Genes involved in sister chromatid separation are needed for B-type cyclin proteolysis in budding yeast. Cell 81:269-278.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Javerzat, J. P., G. Cranston, and R. C. Allshire. 1996. Fission yeast genes which disrupt mitotic chromosome segregation when overexpressed. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:4676-4683.
18. Kaiser, C., S. Michaelis, and A. Mitchel. 1994. Methods in yeast genetics, 1994 edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
19. King, R. W., J. M. Peters, S. Tugendreich, M. Rolfe, P. Hieter, and M. W. Kirschner. 1995. A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B. Cell 81:279-288.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Kitamura, K., H. Maekawa, and C. Shimoda. 1998. Fission yeast Ste9, a homolog of Hct1/Cdh1 and Fizzy-related, is a novel negative regulator of cell cycle progression during G1 phase. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:1065-1080.
21. Kominami, K., H. Seth Smith, and T. Toda. 1998. Apc10 and Ste9/Srw1, two regulators of the APC-cyclosome, as well as the CDK inhibitor Rum1 are required for G1 cell-cycle arrest in fission yeast. EMBO J. 17:5388-5399.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Kramer, E. R., C. Gieffers, G. Holzl, M. Hengstschlager, and J. M. Peters. 1998. Activation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by proteins of the CDC20/Fizzy family. Curr. Biol. 8:1207-1210.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Leverson, J. D., C. A. Joazeiro, A. M. Page, H. Huang, P. Hieter, and T. Hunter. 2000. The APC11 RING-H2 finger mediates E2-dependent ubiquitination. Mol. Biol. Cell 11:2315-2325.
24. Luca, F. C., and J. V. Ruderman. 1989. Control of programmed cyclin destruction in a cell-free system. J. Cell Biol. 109:1895-1909.
25. Matsumoto, T. 1997. A fission yeast homolog of CDC20/p55CDC/Fizzy is required for recovery from DNA damage and genetically interacts with p34cdc2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:742-750.[Abstract]
26. Maundrell, K. 1993. Thiamine-repressible expression vectors pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene 123:127-130.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Mitsuzawa, H., H. Seino, F. Yamao, and A. Ishihama. 2001. Two WD repeat-containing TATA-binding protein-associated factors in fission yeast that suppress defects in the anaphase-promoting complex. J. Biol. Chem. 276:17117-17124.
28. Murray, A. W. 1995. Cyclin ubiquitination: the destructive end of mitosis. Cell 81:149-152.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Murray, A. W., M. J. Solomon, and M. W. Kirschner. 1989. The role of cyclin synthesis and degradation in the control of maturation promoting factor activity. Nature 339:280-286.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Nurse, P. 1990. Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M phase. Nature 344:503-508.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Nurse, P. 1994. Ordering S phase and M phase in the cell cycle. Cell 79:547-550.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Osaka, F., H. Seino, T. Seno, and F. Yamao. 1997. A ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in fission yeast that is essential for the onset of anaphase in mitosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3388-3397.[Abstract]
33. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1990. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, second edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
34. Samejima, I., and M. Yanagida. 1994. Bypassing anaphase by fission yeast cut9 mutation: requirement of cut9+ to initiate anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 127:1655-1670.
35. Sanchez Diaz, A., I. Gonzalez, M. Arellano, and S. Moreno. 1998. The Cdk inhibitors p25rum1 and p40SIC1 are functional homologues that play similar roles in the regulation of the cell cycle in fission and budding yeast. J. Cell Sci. 111:843-851.[Abstract]
36. Schwab, M., A. S. Lutum, and W. Seufert. 1997. Yeast Hct1 is a regulator of Clb2 cyclin proteolysis. Cell 90:683-693.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Schwab, M., M. Neutzner, D. Mocker, and W. Seufert. 2001. Yeast Hct1 recognizes the mitotic cyclin Clb2 and other substrates of the ubiquitin ligase APC. EMBO J. 20:5165-5175.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Sigrist, S. J., and C. F. Lehner. 1997. Drosophila fizzy-related down-regulates mitotic cyclins and is required for cell proliferation arrest and entry into endocycles. Cell 90:671-681.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Sudakin, V., D. Ganoth, A. Dahan, H. Heller, J. Hershko, F. C. Luca, J. V. Ruderman, and A. Hershko. 1995. The cyclosome, a large complex containing cyclin-selective ubiquitin ligase activity, targets cyclins for destruction at the end of mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 6:185-197.[Abstract]
40. Tang, Z., B. Li, R. Bharadwaj, H. Zhu, E. Ozkan, K. Hakala, J. Deisenhofer, and H. Yu. 2001. APC2 Cullin protein and APC11 RING protein comprise the minimal ubiquitin ligase module of the anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:3839-3851.
41. Townsley, F. M., A. Aristarkhov, S. Beck, A. Hershko, and J. V. Ruderman. 1997. Dominant-negative cyclin-selective ubiquitin carrier protein E2-C/UbcH10 blocks cells in metaphase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:2362-2367.
42. Townsley, F. M., and J. V. Ruderman. 1998. Functional analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae UBC11 gene. Yeast 14:747-757.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Tugendreich, S., J. Tomkiel, W. Earnshaw, and P. Hieter. 1995. CDC27Hs colocalizes with CDC16Hs to the centrosome and mitotic spindle and is essential for the metaphase to anaphase transition. Cell 81:261-268.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Varshavsky, A. 1997. The ubiquitin system. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:383-387.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Visintin, R., S. Prinz, and A. Amon. 1997. CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science 278:460-463.
46. Yamaguchi, S., H. Murakami, and H. Okayama. 1997. A WD repeat protein controls the cell cycle and differentiation by negatively regulating Cdc2/B-type cyclin complexes. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:2475-2486.
47. Yamaguchi, S., H. Okayama, and P. Nurse. 2000. Fission yeast Fizzy-related protein srw1p is a G1-specific promoter of mitotic cyclin B degradation. EMBO J. 19:3968-3977.[CrossRef][Medline]
48. Yamano, H., J. Gannon, and T. Hunt. 1996. The role of proteolysis in cell cycle progression in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 15:5268-5279.[Medline]
49. Yanagida, M. 2000. Cell cycle mechanisms of sister chromatid separation; roles of Cut1/separin and Cut2/securin. Genes Cells 5:1-8.[Abstract]
50. Yu, H., R. W. King, J. M. Peters, and M. W. Kirschner. 1996. Identification of a novel ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme involved in mitotic cyclin degradation. Curr. Biol. 6:455-466.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Zachariae, W., and K. Nasmyth. 1999. Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev. 13:2039-2058.
52. Zhang, Y., Z. Wang, D. X. Liu, M. Pagano, and K. Ravid. 1998. Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of cyclin B is accelerated in polyploid megakaryocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1387-1392.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|