Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2003, p. 4485-4493, Vol. 23, No. 13
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.13.4485-4493.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
Received 10 February 2003/ Returned for modification 2 April 2003/ Accepted 17 April 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The exact mechanism leading to expansion of trinucleotide repeats is unknown. It is likely to be related to the ability of repeat tracts to form unusual DNA secondary structures such as hairpins and slipped-strand DNA duplexes, which can interfere with aspects of DNA metabolism (see reference 52 for a review). Both Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been used as model systems to study the instability of CTG/CAG repeats. Virtually every process that exposes single strands of DNA destabilizes triplet repeats, including transcription (2, 45), nucleotide excision repair (35, 38), mismatch repair (21, 42, 44, 46), replication (17, 22, 30, 43), and recombination (9, 18-20, 39, 40). CTG/CAG triplet repeats also cause double-strand DNA breaks in yeast (9, 20). Similarly, studies with mammalian cells have shown that DNA replication (6, 37), mismatch repair (23, 27, 53), and proximity to CpG islands (4) contribute to destabilization of triplet repeats. Based on these studies, several models of repeat expansion have been proposed (reviewed in references 3 and 52). Small changes in repeat length may be caused by the slippage of DNA polymerases, while larger changes may result from errors of DNA repair machinery. For example, if single- or double-strand breaks are formed close to the repeat tract, flaps, hairpins, or other complex DNA structures could form at the ends, leading to errors in DNA repair. Furthermore, alternative DNA structures formed at the repeat locus might by themselves be recognized by DNA repair proteins (such as mismatch repair machinery), which could lead to aberrant processing and promote repeat expansions or contractions (reviewed in reference 47).
Understanding the mechanisms that lead to expansion of triplet repeats may allow development of approaches to prevent the lengthening of repeat tracts or even to induce contractions of the expanded repeats in order to stop the progression of neurodegenerative disorders. To search for genetic factors or therapeutic treatments that affect repeat stability, it is critical to use a sensitive assay. Assays based on inactivation of a selectable reporter gene such as URA3 or chloramphenicol acetyltransferase have been developed for yeast (34, 41) and E. coli (14). However, to achieve the ultimate goal of finding a cure for triplet repeat diseases, it is essential to find treatments that are effective in mammalian cells. Presently, trinucleotide repeat instability is assayed in mammalian cells by methods such as small-pool PCR and GeneScan, which can detect frequencies of repeat change in the range from 10-2 to 10-3, and thus lack the sensitivity of a selectable genetic assay.
In this report we describe a new genetic assay for trinucleotide repeat contractions in mammalian cells that is selective and quantitative. The assay is based on the novel finding that long CAG repeats cloned into an intron of a reporter gene disrupt correct splicing and become incorporated into mRNA, thereby inactivating the gene. Using this system, we demonstrate that aphidicolin and hydroxyurea, which affect DNA replication, and gamma irradiation, which induces DNA breaks, destabilize long repeat tracts in mammalian cells. The selectable system that we have developed provides a versatile tool for the further analysis of CTG/CAG repeat instability.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Reporter cassettes for detection of repeat instability. CTG-CAG repeat tracts of various lengths were cloned in two orientations into intron 2 of the hamster APRT gene or the single intron in the human HPRT minigene, as described in Materials and Methods.
|
Cell lines. For integration of CAG repeat tracts at the endogenous APRT locus in CHO cells, the XhoI site in the third exon of the APRT gene in pJHW1 plasmids carrying (CAG)98 and (CAG)175 was cleaved, filled in, and ligated. FLP recombinase-mediated site-specific integration at the FRT site in RMP34 cells, which carry a wild-type APRT gene with an FRT site in the second intron (31), was expected to generate an upstream APRT- gene that carried the XhoI site mutation and a downstream gene that was APRT- by virtue of the CAG triplet repeat. As described previously (31), this procedure generates apparent single-step replacements at a frequency of about 25%. Two such single-step replacements were isolated from transfections with (CAG)98 and (CAG)175 and were shown by sequencing to carry (CAG)95 and (CAG)61, respectively, at the expected location in intron 2 in an otherwise wild-type APRT gene. The structure of the integrated constructs was verified by Southern blotting. It is unclear at what point the changes in repeat tract length occurred, but single colonies were isolated and confirmed by DNA sequencing to contain (CAG)95 and (CAG)61.
APRT and HPRT selection assays. Cells were plated at 5 x 105 cells per 100-mm-diameter plate in the presence of ALASA selection (50 µM azaserine, 25 µM alanosine, and 100 µM adenine) to select for APRT+ colonies or in the presence of HAT selection (0.1 mM hypoxanthine, 0.4 µM aminopterine, and 16 µM thymidine) to select for gpt+ or HPRT+ colonies. Plate contents were incubated undisturbed for 3 weeks. The colonies were then picked for analysis or stained with 1% Coomassie blue for counting.
Northern blot analysis and reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR). Northern blot analysis was performed by using the NorthernMax-Gly kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The probes for Northern analysis of APRT transcripts were two PCR products amplified from exons 2 and 3 of the APRT gene, which were subsequently labeled by random priming in the presence of [32P]dCTP.
For RT-PCR, total RNA was extracted from cells by using an RNA-Easy kit (Qiagen) and was then reverse transcribed and amplified with a Titan Single Tube RT-PCR kit (Roche). Primers that anneal within exons 2 (5'-ACCTTAAGTCCACGCATGGCGGCAAGATCG) and 3 (5'-CTTCCCTCGCTTCCGGATGAGCACACAGCC) were used for the APRT gene transcript. The following primers were used to amplify exon 2-exon 3 junctions from the human HPRT minigene: 5'-CCTTGATTTATTTTGCATACCTAATCATTATGCT and 5'-ACAATGTGATGGCCTCCCATCTCCTTCATC. These primers were designed so that they do not amplify the hamster HPRT gene from CHO cells.
PCR amplification of CTG/CAG repeat tracts and sequencing. CTG/CAG repeat tracts were amplified by using a GC-rich PCR amplification kit (Roche). The following primer pairs that anneal within intron 2 of the APRT gene or inside exons 2 and 3 were used to amplify and characterize contraction events: primers immediately flanking the repeat tract (5'-CCTCTAGAGTCGTCCTTGTAGCCGGGAATG and 5'-GCCTGGCCGAAAGAAAGAAATGGTCTGTGATCC); primers that anneal 100 bp away from the repeat tract (5'-GAAACACCCTAGGGTCGCTGAATGTCCACC and 5'-TAGCACATGTCAGGGCTACCGAATTCGCGG); primers that anneal 200 bp away from the repeat tract (5'-TAGGAGTAGCACCTAAGATGAACTAGATGC and 5'-AGTTCAGGGTATATGTCTGGGGTCACTTCC); and primers that anneal within the exons flanking the repeat tract, i.e., exon 2 (5'-ACCTTAAGTCCACGCATGGCGGCAAGATCG) and exon 3 (5'-CTTCCCTCGCTTCCGGATGAGCACACAGCC). Following initial characterization of contracted repeats by PCR, the PCR products were cloned by using a TOPO-2 PCR cloning kit (Invitrogen) and were sequenced.
Mutagenic treatments. Actively dividing cells were treated with 1.7 Gy of gamma irradiation or were incubated in the presence of 0.5 µg of aphidicolin/ml or 0.5 mM hydroxyurea for 12 h. The cells were then allowed to recover for 3 days. For each treatment, 2 x 107 treated cells were plated at a density of 5 x 105 cells per 100-mm-diameter dish and were incubated in the presence of APRT+ selection (ALASA) for 3 weeks and were stained with Coomassie blue. Aliquots of cells were plated on nonselective media to calculate survival and plating efficiency. The rate of formation of APRT+ clones was calculated by dividing the number of APRT+ clones by the survival rate (plated cells/surviving cells) and dividing by the number of population doublings that the cells underwent after treatment prior to applying APRT+ selection.
|
|
|---|
Effects of repeat orientation on the APRT phenotype were examined by transfection and by analysis of stable transformants. Plasmids carrying the modified APRT gene and an adjacent GPT gene (Fig. 1) were transfected into CHO RMP41 cells, which are APRT- (31), and the ratio of APRT+ to GPT+ colonies was determined (Table 1). In some cases, stable GPT+ transformants were isolated and screened by Southern blotting for single-copy integrants that carried the adjacent APRT gene, and then the ratio of APRT+ to GPT+ colonies was determined by plating the cells under appropriate selection conditions (Table 1). In both assays, all lengths of CTG repeat yielded approximately equal numbers of APRT+ and GPT+ colonies, indicating that repeats in the CTG orientation do not interfere with APRT expression, as expected from our previous results (33). By contrast, the outcome with repeats in the CAG orientation depended on the length of the tract. Plasmids with 32 or fewer repeats gave equal numbers of APRT+ and GPT+ colonies, whereas plasmids with (CAG)67, (CAG)98, or (CAG)175 gave few if any APRT+ colonies, indicating that long CAG tracts in some way kill the activity of the APRT gene.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Effect of CAG and CTG repeats of different lengths on APRT activity
|
Thus, long CAG repeat tracts inserted into an intron of a reporter gene such as APRT or HPRT can provide a convenient selectable assay to monitor contractions of the repeat tracts. To verify and characterize the selectable system and to analyze treatments that affect CAG repeat stability, we inserted two different long tracts of CAG repeats(CAG)61 and (CAG)95into the endogenous APRT gene in CHO cells, as described in Materials and Methods. By making comparison at a single, well-characterized chromosomal locus, we sought to avoid potential difficulties in interpretation that might arise due to chromosomal context effects. As described in detail later in Results, when APRT- cells carrying (CAG)61 or (CAG)95 were subjected to selection, the APRT+ colonies that arose all contained fewer CAG triplets, validating this selective system as a tool for studying contraction of long CAG repeats. Two APRT+ colonies, which carried (CAG)24 and (CAG)31, were isolated and used along with the parental APRT- cell lines with (CAG)61 and (CAG)95 to investigate the mechanism by which long CAG repeat tracts interfere with gene expression.
Long CAG repeat tracts interfere with correct splicing of reporter genes. To determine the mechanism by which CAG repeat tracts interfere with gene function in our system, we analyzed mRNAs from the modified APRT and HPRT genes by Northern blotting. The APRT(CAG)24, APRT(CAG)31, APRT(CAG)61, and APRT(CAG)95 cell lines produced mRNAs that increased in size with increasing repeat length (Fig. 2A). The APRT+ cell lines, APRT(CAG)24 and APRT(CAG)31, contained an mRNA of the correct size, whereas the APRT- cell lines, APRT(CAG)61 and APRT(CAG)95, produced only an aberrant product. This corresponds well to the phenotype of the cell lines, with APRT(CAG)24 and APRT(CAG)31 being APRT+, and APRT(CAG)61 and APRT(CAG)95 being APRT-. In addition, the amount of the APRT mRNA in APRT(CAG)61 and APRT(CAG)95 cell lines was reduced approximately 10-fold from that in the wild-type APRT cell line. Transiently transfected HPRT minigene constructs carrying different lengths of CAG repeats showed the same trends (Fig. 2B).
![]() View larger version (50K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Northern blot analysis of mRNA transcribed from APRT or HPRT genes. (A) Total RNA was extracted from an APRT- cell line carrying a deletion of the APRT gene, from wild-type (wt) APRT+ CHO cells, and from the APRT(CAG)24, APRT(CAG)31, APRT(CAG)61, and APRT(CAG)95 cell lines. (B) Total RNA was prepared from HPRT- CHO cells and from CHO cells transiently transfected with plasmids harboring the HPRT minigene alone or the HPRT minigene with insertions of CAG repeat tracts of various lengths. Equal amounts of total RNA were separated on agarose gels, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with probes to exon 2 and exon 3 of the APRT gene or to exons 1 and 2 of the HPRT minigene.
|
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. RT-PCR analysis of APRT and HPRT mRNA. (A) Total RNA was extracted from CHO cell lines carrying a deletion of the APRT gene, the wild-type (wt) APRT, and APRT genes with insertions of CAG repeats. (B) Total RNA was extracted from CHO cells transiently transfected with the control plasmid, a plasmid containing the intact human HPRT minigene, and a set of plasmids containing CAG repeat tracts of various lengths cloned into the intron of the HPRT minigene. Junctions between exons 2 and 3 of the hamster APRT gene and junctions between exons 2 and 3 of the human HPRT minigene were amplified by RT-PCR and were separated on agarose gels. The lower band in each lane corresponds to the product expected for correct splicing of exons 2 and 3. Upper bands correspond to transcripts containing the CAG exon incorporated between exons 2 and 3. MW, molecular weight.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Sequence analysis of APRT(CAG)n and HPRT(CAG)n mRNAs. RT-PCR products from the APRT(CAG)n and HPRT(CAG)n genes shown in Fig. 2 were cloned and sequenced. For each RT-PCR, the lower and upper bands were excised from a gel and were cloned individually. Shaded boxes indicate sequences that are included in the mRNA. (A) A typical splicing product containing the CAG repeat tract incorporated into APRT or HPRT mRNA is shown. Putative splicing signals for the CAG exon are indicated; capital letters indicate nucleotides that match the consensus for the branch point, the pyrimidine tract, and the splice sites. (B) Splicing product containing a CAG exon with an atypical 3' splice site and a short insertion upstream of the CAG exon. (C) A summary of various insertions incorporated between the exon borders in the atypical splicing products. Each splicing product contained only one such insertion. For all the insertions, homology can be found within the intronic sequences and the position of the homology is indicated. Insertions that are too short for homology to be uniquely defined are designated short inserts and are shown in a separate box. In the APRT gene, most of the insertions begin with a GC dinucleotide, incorporation of which may have been caused by a shift in the exon boundary. Insertions in the APRT mRNA that do not begin with GC are marked with an asterisk. The CCCGG insert in APRT mRNA matches two sequences in the 3' flanking region of the CAG repeat tract (see panels A and B).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Analysis of RT-PCR products from APRT and HPRT mRNA
|
In summary, Northern and RT-PCR analyses have demonstrated that CAG repeat tracts are recognized as exons and are incorporated into mRNA. The CAG exon shifts the reading frame, preventing synthesis of functional APRT or HPRT enzymes. Stop codons in the new reading frame presumably trigger nonsense-mediated decay, which may account for the lower-than-normal levels of mRNAs carrying the CAG exon (Fig. 2). The efficiency of splicing apparently depends on the length of the CAG repeat tract, with short tracts of repeats generating sufficient normal mRNA to confer an APRT+ or HPRT+ phenotype on cells.
Analysis of spontaneous contraction events recovered by using the APRT+ selection assay. To determine the frequency of spontaneous contractions, we used the APRT(CAG)61 and APRT(CAG)95 cell lines, which are APRT-. Cells were propagated under APRT- selection conditions, which kill APRT+ cells, in order to eliminate preexisting contraction events from the cell population. Then the cells were grown for 3 days (approximately 2.5 population doublings) without selection, plated under APRT+ selection, and kept in the presence of APRT+ selection until visible APRT+ colonies had formed. The colonies were counted to determine the rate of formation of APRT+ cells. For the APRT(CAG)61 cell line, the rate of reversion to APRT+ was 3.1 x 10-6 ± 0.9 x 10-6 per cell division, and for the APRT(CAG)95 cell line the rate was 1.4 x 10-6 ± 0.4 x 10-6 per cell division. To examine the nature of the events that lead to the APRT+ phenotype, we isolated individual APRT+ colonies, amplified the CAG region by PCR, and sequenced across the repeat tract. The majority of the colonies [18 of 18 from APRT(CAG)61 and 9 of 16 from APRT(CAG)95] contained a contracted CAG repeat tract, with no changes to the flanking sequences (Table 3). The CAG repeat tracts in these colonies ranged from 4 to 33 repeats, indicating that the maximum number of CAG repeats compatible with APRT activity is 33.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Analysis of sequences around CAG repeats in APRT+ clones derived from APRT(CAG)61 and APRT(CAG)95 cell lines
|
Effect of gamma irradiation and DNA replication inhibitors on CTG/CAG repeats. Studies with E. coli and yeast have suggested that double-strand breaks and stalled replication forks contribute to the instability of triplet repeats (9, 17, 20, 22, 30, 43). We have tested the effect of these factors on triplet repeat stability in mammalian cells by using the APRT(CAG)61 and APRT(CAG)95 cell lines. Cells were treated with 1.7 Gy of gamma irradiation to induce double-strand breaks or were incubated in the presence of 0.5 µg of aphidicolin/ml or 0.5 mM hydroxyurea for 12 h to disrupt replication forks. Following these treatments, cells were allowed to recover for 3 days and were plated under APRT+ selection, and the rates of APRT+ colony formation were determined (Fig. 5). Gamma irradiation, aphidicolin, and hydroxyurea increased the rate of APRT+ colony formation by the APRT(CAG)95 cell line by five- to sevenfold. In contrast, no stimulation of the rate was observed with the APRT(CAG)61 cell line, suggesting that the (CAG)61 repeat tract is not long enough to be destabilized effectively by these treatments. Stimulation of repeat contractions in the APRT(CAG)95 cell line by gamma irradiation and DNA replication inhibitors supports current models, which assert that DNA breaks and stalled replication forks contribute to repeat instability, and also shows that this cell line can be used as a sensitive tool to search for potential therapeutic agents for triplet repeat diseases in mammalian cells.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effect of hydroxyurea, aphidicolin, and gamma irradiation on the rate of CAG repeat contractions in APRT(CAG)61 and APRT(CAG)95 cell lines. Cells were treated with hydroxyurea (HU), aphidicolin (APC), and gamma irradiation ( ) as described in Materials and Methods and were incubated in the presence of APRT+ selection, and the number of APRT+ clones was scored. Approximately 107 cells were used for each treatment. All the treatments were repeated at least three times, and error bars represent the standard deviation.
|
|
|
|---|
We have demonstrated that our assay can be used with two different selectable genes, APRT and HPRT, in two different cell types: hamster CHO and HT1080 human fibrosarcoma cells. This selection system offers the possibility of analyzing triplet repeat stability in various cell types by using a common assay in order to study and compare cell lines with specific mutations or cell lines isolated from patients. The only requirement for a cell line is that it be either APRT- or HPRT-. Because the HPRT gene is located on the X chromosome, HPRT- variants can be readily selected from cell lines that carry a single functional copy of the X chromosome.
We have used this assay at the APRT locus in CHO cells to monitor contractions of repeat tracts from 95 or 61 repeats to 33 or fewer; that is, contractions of a minimum of 62 or 28 repeats, respectively. Since there seems to be a fairly sharp cutoff at 33 repeats for the APRT+ phenotype, it should be possible to construct parental cell lines with shorter repeat tracts in order to detect small contractions or with longer repeat tracts to assay larger ones. Contractions of at least 30 or more repeats, as detected by our present assay system, are perhaps the most relevant for studies designed to search for possible therapeutic agents. Only the treatments that induce substantial repeat contractions offer the possibility of a cure for patients whose genomes contain pathological expansions of triplet repeats.
The present selection assay is designed to detect contractions of CAG repeats, which represent an important avenue of research into treatment of triplet repeat diseases. Of equal importance, however, are the processes that lead to expansion of repeat tracts in the first place. Because APRT and HPRT genes can be selected in either direction, it should be possible, in principle, to design selection assays for expansion. For example, it may be feasible to use the APRT(CAG)33 cell line, which is APRT+, to select for expansions to longer repeat tracts, which are APRT-. Fortuitously, the crossover point in this assay33 repeatsis at the upper range of normal in the progression of the human disease and is perhaps ideally suited for studying the initial instability that leads to the disease state.
Effect of CAG repeat tracts on splicing.
We describe here a novel property of CTG/CAG repeat tracts from the myotonic dystrophy locus, which serves as the basis for our selectable assay. The CTG/CAG repeat tracts in the CAG orientation behave like exons, forcing themselves into the mRNA and interfering with correct splicing. Many exons are known to contain auxiliary splicing elements called exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs) (reviewed in reference 1). ESEs usually associate with introns containing weak flanking splice sites, and function to promote utilization of adjacent splice sites (reviewed in references 10 and 26). The majority of ESEs that have been identified are purine-rich repeats. Remarkably, a CA-rich motif has also been found to function as an ESE and to promote splicing in vivo and in vitro (7, 11, 25, 50, 54). We propose, therefore, that CAG repeat tracts can function as ESEs and that the longer the repeat tract is, the stronger is the ESE signal that it provides. The possibility that CAG repeat tracts act as ESEs is supported by examination of the putative splicing signals flanking the CAG exon. The putative 3' and 5' splicing signals (Fig. 4A) are derived from the natural sequences at the myotonic dystrophy locus, although they are oriented opposite to the direction of transcription. The 3' splice site signal UGGUCUGUGAUCCCCCCAG
C resembles the consensus (Y)
15NYAG
G, as does the 5' splice site signal (GG
GUACCG versus the consensus AG
GURAGU), but neither is a close match, and thus, they are likely to be weak. Indeed an alternative, presumably weaker 5' splice site, CG
GCTACA, was found among the RT-PCR products. It is unclear what sequence is used for the branch point; however, the sequence CTCAGC, which resembles the branch point consensus CTRAYY, would position the critical A residue 40 nucleotides upstream of the 3' splice site, well within the usual range for such signals (36). These observations are consistent with the idea that tracts of CAG repeats can enhance splicing in the absence of canonical splice sites and promote utilization of cryptic splice sites in the adjacent sequences. We do not know how the presence of long CAG tracts leads to the appearance of spliced products with shifted exon boundaries or extra nucleotides in addition to or in place of the CAG tract itself (Fig. 4C). We can speculate that long CAG repeat tracts disrupt the normal course of splicing, resulting in various aberrant products.
The effect of CAG repeat tracts on splicing may contribute to the etiology of trinucleotide repeat disorders. In the case of the myotonic dystrophy gene, the repeat tract is in the CTG orientation (52), which does not interfere with splicing. It is possible, however, that the presence of the repeat may affect the splicing of adjacent genes that are transcribed in the opposite direction. In the polyglutamine disorders, such as Huntington's disease and spinocerebellar ataxias 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7, the CAG repeat is expanded within an exon (reviewed in reference 55). Based on our results that a CAG tract can interfere with normal splicing and recruit various cryptic sequences as splice sites, we speculate that an expanded CAG tract within a functional exon may also promote utilization of aberrant splice sites. Alterations in the splicing of the adjacent downstream intron could lead to frameshifts and formation of truncated proteins containing polyglutamine tracts. Indeed, for huntingtin, atrophin-1, and the androgen receptor, the neurotoxicity of the expanded CAG repeat has been attributed to the formation of truncated polyglutamine-containing proteins (5, 15, 16, 24, 28, 32). The truncated versions of huntingtin and the androgen receptor have been detected in cells containing expanded CAG tracts but not in the normal cells (8, 12, 24, 32). Furthermore, overexpression of full-length huntingtin, atrophin-1, and the androgen receptor in tissue culture cells revealed that these proteins have predominantly cytoplasmic and/or perinuclear localization with some propensity to aggregate. In contrast, nuclear localization and aggregation, which are the hallmarks of the toxicity of polyglutamine proteins, have been observed only when truncated peptides harboring the expanded polyglutamine tracts were overexpressed (5, 15, 16, 24, 28, 32). It has been suggested that some processing of the full-length polyglutamine protein takes place in the cells, which liberates the toxic peptide (55). Based on the results presented here, we propose an alternative explanation: that the toxic peptides are produced by aberrant splicing of CAG-containing exons, which creates premature termination codons.
Mechanisms of repeat contraction. The rates of spontaneous repeat contractions leading to the APRT+ phenotype were 3.1 x 10-6 ± 0.9 x 10-6 and 1.4 x 10-6 ± 0.4 x 10-6 per cell generation for the (CAG)61 and (CAG)95 cell lines, respectively. It is somewhat surprising that the longer repeat tract appears to be more stable. In our system, however, in order to convert to the APRT+ phenotype, (CAG)61 has to contract by 28 repeats, while (CAG)95 has to contract by at least 62 repeats. Therefore, the lower rates of APRT+ colony formation in the (CAG)95 cell line may be due to a lower rate of large contractions.
The difference in rates is paralleled by a difference in the types of contraction events observed in the (CAG)61 and (CAG)95 cell lines. While all the colonies obtained from the (CAG)61 cell line were "clean" contractions involving only the CAG repeats, about 44% of the events from the (CAG)95 cell line carried deletions that extended into the DNA flanking the repeat tract. This observation suggests that the longer contractions in the (CAG)95 cell line may be generated in part by a mechanism different from the one that gives rise to the shorter contractions in the (CAG)61 cell line. For example, it could be that contraction of (CAG)61 repeats occurs mainly by formation of a hairpin followed by replication slippage, which leaves the flanking regions intact. In addition to this mechanism, it may be that larger hairpins formed by (CAG)95 repeats are recognized by DNA repair enzymes and are resolved via some kind of nonhomologous recombination event that involves DNA breakage and promotes deletions in the flanking sequences. Whatever the mechanism, it is important to note that both types of eventspure contractions and contractions with flanking deletionshave been observed in human patients suffering from triplet repeat diseases (see reference 33 for discussion).
Chemotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of triplet repeat diseases. Treatments with aphidicolin, hydroxyurea, and gamma irradiation induced contractions in (CAG)95 but not in (CAG)61. As discussed above, repeat contractions in (CAG)61 and (CAG)95 cell lines may occur, in part, by different mechanisms, with longer contractions being dependent on nonhomologous recombination events. It would be consistent, therefore, that gamma irradiation-induced DNA breaks, which are repaired via a recombination pathway, have stronger effects on large contractions in (CAG)95. Similarly, stalled replication forks induced by aphidicolin and hydroxyurea may be likelier to resolve by a recombination event if they involve a long hairpin in (CAG)95. In terms of chemotherapy, the observation that longer repeats show a greater increase in the rate of contractions following mutagenic treatment is very promising. The very long repeat tracts found in myotonic dystrophy, fragile X syndrome, and Friedreich ataxia may be especially sensitive to this kind of therapy.
The results presented in this report show that chemical treatments can induce contractions of trinucleotide repeat tracts, suggesting that chemotherapeutic approaches may be applicable to trinucleotide repeat diseases. The five- to sevenfold stimulation of repeat contractions that we observed with aphidicolin, hydroxyurea, and gamma irradiation is still too low to have any therapeutic significance. In addition, nonspecific mutagens like the reagents used here are likely to induce mutations in many other genomic sites. However, since trinucleotide repeat tracts form unusual DNA structures, it seems feasible that drugs can be found that specifically interact with long repeat tracts and promote high rates of contraction events. We believe that the selectable assay for triplet repeat contractions, reported here, will greatly facilitate the search for such drugs.
V.G. and A.S. contributed equally to this research.
This work was supported by a Human Frontier of Science postdoctoral fellowship to V.G. and an NIH grant (GM38219) and a Muscular Dystrophy Association grant to J.H.W.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»