Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2003, p. 4598-4610, Vol. 23, No. 13
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.13.4598-4610.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Molecular Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine IV,1 Department of Physiology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany2
Received 2 December 2002/ Returned for modification 7 January 2003/ Accepted 18 April 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The regulation of TERT involves transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms. Sequence analysis has revealed that the human TERT promoter contains binding sites for several transcription factors (35). There is also growing evidence for posttranscriptional regulation of TERT. Thus, telomerase enzyme activity can be posttranscriptionally regulated by the kinases c-Abl, protein kinase C, ERK1/2, and Akt (5, 27, 30, 31, 33, 35, 38, 54, 61, 65). Moreover, binding proteins, like heat shock proteins (HSPs), seem to be required for telomerase enzyme activity (29). Recently, the translocation of TERT has been described as a third mechanism for posttranscriptional regulation (36, 53). Thereby, TERT was shown to be imported from the cytoplasm into the nucleus in T cells and smooth muscle cells upon stimulation with growth factors (36, 41). Another study demonstrated that 14-3-3 signaling proteins bind to TERT and thereby prevent nuclear export (53). Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that active human telomerase has a regulated intranuclear localization that is dependent on the cell cycle state, transformation, and DNA damage (60).
Generally, the exchange of small molecules and macromolecules in and out of the nucleus proceeds through nuclear pore complexes (51). Nuclear pores allow passage in essentially two modes: passive diffusion and facilitated translocation (43). Since passive diffusion is inefficient as the diffusing objects approach a size limit of 40 kDa (46), larger macromolecules cross the nuclear pore in a complex consisting of transport receptorsexportins for nuclear export and importins for nuclear importand the small GTPase Ran (43). The gradient in Ran-GTP concentration across the nuclear envelope thereby is crucial for the directionality of the transport (43).
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been implicated in aging, apoptosis, and numerous diseases (6, 12, 22, 59). Upon production of high levels of ROS from exogenous or endogenous sources, the redox balance is perturbed and cells are shifted into a state of oxidative stress, which subsequently leads to modifications of intracellular proteins and lipids and to direct DNA damage (47). When the stress is severe, survival of the cell is dependent on the repair or replacement of damaged molecules, which can result in induction of apoptosis in severely damaged cells.
Since the enzyme TERT seems to be involved in processes of aging and apoptosis, we wanted to disclose a potential link between ROS and human TERT (hTERT), by investigating the regulation of hTERT by oxidative stress. Here, we demonstrate that oxidative stress induces the depletion of hTERT from the nucleus via export through the nuclear pores. Nuclear export is initiated by ROS-induced phosphorylation of tyrosine 707 within hTERT by the Src kinase family. Interference with the Src kinase family-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of hTERT inhibits depletion of nuclear hTERT and thereby potentiates the antiapoptotic capacity of hTERT.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Ran wild type (Ran wt) was cloned out of cDNA by using sense (5'-GCGAATTCATGGCTGCGCAGGGAGAG) and antisense (5'-GCGGATCCGAACAGGTCATCCTCATCCGGGAGAGC) primers incorporating EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites. The amplified DNA was restriction digested with EcoRI and BamHI and subcloned into pcDNA3.1myc-his vector. Sequencing confirmed the correct orientation and the entire coding region. Ran Q69L, Ran G19V, and RanT24N mutants were introduced into Ran wt by site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene).
Cell culture and transfection. 293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. 293 cells were transfected with Lipofectamine/Plus according to the manufacturer's protocol (Gibco BRL) as previously described (24) with a transfection efficiency of 90% ± 4%.
Telomerase enzyme activity measurement. Telomerase enzyme activity was measured with a commercially available PCR-based assay according to the manufacturer's protocol (Roche) as previously described (58).
In brief, after PCR amplification, PCR products were used for detection of telomerase enzyme activity by either (i) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or (ii) telomerase-mediated DNA laddering. (i) For ELISA, The PCR products are immobilized via the biotin-labeled TS primers (provided with the assay) to a streptavidin-coated microtiter plate. The linearity of the assay was ensured by the positive controls provided by the company, and as negative controls, H2O was used in the presence of the biotinylated primers. (ii) For the telomerase-mediated DNA laddering, PCR products were resolved on a 12% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel. After transfer to positively charged nylone membranes, the 6-bp telomerase-specific ladder was detected with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase and the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham).
Separation of nuclear and cytosolic fractions. Nuclear and cytosolic fractions were separated with a commercially available kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Pierce). In brief, cells were scraped off the dish and centrifuged at 800 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The resulting pellet was resolved in cytosolic extraction reagent I (CERI buffer; provided by Pierce) and incubated for 10 min at 4°C. After addition of CERII buffer (provided by Pierce) and further incubation for 1 min at 4°C, samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 16,000 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatant contained the cytosolic fraction. The resulting pellet was resuspended in nuclear extraction reagent (NER) buffer and incubated for 60 min at 4°C. After centrifugation for 15 min at 16,000 x g at 4°C, the resulting supernatant was obtained as the nuclear fraction. The purity of the nuclear and cytosolic fractions was ensured by immunoblotting with topoisomerase 1 (nuclear) and HSP70 (cytosolic).
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. Lysates (500 µg) were immunoprecipitated with 5 µg of Ran antibody or myc antibody overnight at 4°C. After incubation with A/G Plus agarose (Santa Cruz) for 2 h at 4°C, the resulting beads were washed, subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer, and dissolved by SDS-PAGE.
Immunoblotting was performed with antibodies directed against TERT (1:200, overnight, 4°C; Calbiochem); Ran, myc, and topoisomerase 1 (2 h, 1:250; all Santa Cruz); tubulin (2 h, 1:500; Neomarkers); HSP70 and phosphotyrosine clone 4G10 (overnight, 4°C, 1:500; Upstate Biotechnologies); and actin (2 h, 1:2,000; Sigma). Antibodies were detected by the Amersham ECL enhanced chemiluminescence system.
Immunostaining. For immunostaining, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 and 3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).
For coimmunostaining, cells were first incubated with an antibody against myc (mouse, 1:50; overnight, 4°C; Santa Cruz), and Texas red-conjugated Fab fragment antimouse antibody was used as secondary antibody (1:250, 1 h; Jackson ImmunoResearch, Inc.). Since the antitubulin antibody is from the same host species as the myc antibody (mouse), the cells were then incubated with an excess of unconjugated Fab fragment antimouse antibody to block the first secondary antibody step. Afterwards, cells were incubated with tubulin antibody (mouse, 1:50, 2 h; Neomarkers) and with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Fab fragment antimouse antibody (1:150, 1 h, room temperature; Jackson ImmunoResearch, Inc.). Nuclei were counterstained with 0.2 µg of DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) per ml.
For confocal microscopy, cells were incubated with tubulin antibody (mouse, 1:50, 2 h; Neomarkers) and with FITC-conjugated Fab fragment antimouse antibody (1:150, 1 h, room temperature; Jackson ImmunoResearch, Inc.). Afterwards, cells were incubated with an antibody against myc directly conjugated with tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (sc-40; 1:100, 2 h; Santa Cruz). When indicated, nuclei were incubated with TO-PRO-3 iodide (1:4,000, 5 min; Molecular Probes). Cells were visualized by confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM 510 META; magnification, 1:63 oil).
To quantify the cells with predominantly nuclear TERT-myc staining, 300 cells per staining were counted by three independent observers.
Negative controls were performed as follows. Texas red-conjugated Fab fragment antimouse antibody was used, and coimmunostaining with tubulin was performed as described above. Cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy (Zeiss Axiovert 100; magnification, 1:63).
Detection of oxidative stress. Cells were incubated with 20 µM 2',7' dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA) or 5 µM dihydroethidium (DHE) for 30 min (Molecular Probes). Cells were trypsinized for 2 min, the reaction was stopped with media, and cells were washed with PBS. Fluorescence intensity was measured by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis.
Apoptosis. Apoptosis was determined by FACS analysis with annexin V-phycoerythrin (PE) binding and 7-amino-actinomycin (7AAD)-FITC staining (Pharmingen). Apoptotic cells were defined as annexin V positive and 7AAD negative. In brief, cells were trypsinized in the dish and pelleted. After being washed twice with annexin binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, 140 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2 [pH 7.4]), cell pellets were resuspended in 50 µl of annexin binding buffer and incubated with 2.5 ng (each) of annexin V-PE and 7AAD-FITC per ml for 20 min. The reaction was terminated by addition of 250 µl of annexin binding buffer and then analyzed by FACS.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
/CHX) is known to induce endogenous oxidative stress (14, 26, 62). Indeed, incubation with TNF-
/CHX time dependently increased formation of endogenous ROS, with maximum levels after 30 min as determined by FACS analysis with H2DCF-DA or DHE (Fig. 2A and B). The increase in endogenous ROS formation was blocked by polyethylene glycol-superoxide dismutase (PEG-SOD) (Fig. 2B). The resulting induction of endogenous ROS was accompanied by a translocation of telomerase enzyme activity from the nucleus into the cytosol (Fig. 2C). C2-ceramide, another stimulus known to induce endogenous oxidative stress with a maximum at 6 h in neuronal PC12 cells (14), also profoundly altered the localization of telomerase enzyme activity after 6 h of treatment (Fig. 2C).
|
/CHX for 30 min in the presence or absence of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC). The localization of overexpressed hTERT was also altered from the nucleus into the cytoplasm after TNF-
/CHX treatment, as demonstrated by Western blot analysis of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions (Fig. 2D) and immunostaining (Fig. 2E). NAC inhibited TNF-
/CHX-induced changes in cellular hTERT localization (Fig. 2D and E). Nuclear export of hTERT occurs via the nuclear pores. Having demonstrated that exogenous and endogenous oxidative stress causes changes in the localization of endogenous as well as overexpressed hTERT, we wanted to get insights into the underlying mechanism. Recently, it has been shown that the nuclear export receptor CRM1 can bind to TERT (53). This receptor in concert with the GTPase Ran can bind large cargo molecules and transport them through the nuclear pores into the cytosol. The best-characterized inhibitor for CRM1-Ran-dependent transport is leptomycin B (31a). Therefore, we investigated whether leptomycin B inhibits oxidative stress-induced hTERT translocation. Indeed, leptomycin B inhibited H2O2-induced hTERT export into the cytosol, as shown by immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoblotting after biochemical separation of the nuclear and cytosolic fractions (Fig. 3 A and B). Moreover, H2O2-induced translocation of telomerase enzyme activity from the nuclei into the cytosol was prevented by leptomycin B treatment (Fig. 3C and D).
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies indicated that TERT localization is a highly regulated process. Thus, TERT is translocated from cytoplasm to the nucleus after activation of T lymphocytes (36). Likewise, stimulation of smooth muscle cells with growth factors increased nuclear TERT (41). These studies suggest that proproliferative stimuli induce an increase in nuclear telomerase enzyme activity to maintain telomere length and subsequently the proliferative capacity of the cells. In contrast, the present study demonstrates that ROS induce the export of hTERT. The question remains how ROS initiate complex formation and export. Several previous studiesmainly with yeasthave shown involvement of oxidative stress in nuclear transport via the Ran GTPase. However, these studies reported that ROS induced the shuttling of proteins from the cytoplasm to the nucleus (11). One of the identified targets in mammals that is shuttled from the cytoplasm into the nucleus upon ROS formation is mitogen-activated protein kinase 1/2 (MAPK1/2) (1). We could also document that the MAPK1/2 is reduced in the cytoplasmic fraction in response to oxidative stress under conditions in which hTERT is exported from the nucleus into the cytoplasm (data not shown). Thus, nuclear export of hTERT induced by ROS appears to be mediated by a rather specific mechanism instead of a general effect of ROS on the export machinery.
We demonstrate that the nuclear export of hTERT is regulated by a Ran GTPase-dependent process via the export receptor CRM1. This is evidenced by coimmunoprecipitation of hTERT with Ran and CRM1. These data are in accordance with recent findings by Seimiya et al., who showed that different TERT mutants can be exported from the nucleus (53). Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of the CRM1-binding capacity to its export cargos with leptomycin B or overexpression of a dominant-negative Ran construct prevented ROS-induced nuclear export of hTERT. In contrast to recent findings, we were unable to detect any coimmunoprecipitation of hTERT with 14-3-3 proteins (data not shown), which led us speculate that nuclear export of hTERT induced by oxidative stress may involve a different mechanism. Moreover, it has to be noted that the association of TERT with 14-3-3 proteins seems to be independent of the phosphorylation status of TERT, which also differs from the study presented here (53).
We further identified tyrosine phosphorylation of hTERT as the signal required for nuclear export by a Ran GTPase-dependent process. Oxidative stress is well known to regulate signaling pathways by tyrosine phosphorylation (23, 56). Our data demonstrate that the putative Src phosphorylation site at position Y707 of hTERT is phosphorylated after H2O2 stimulation and that Y707 phosphorylation is required for hTERT-Ran binding. Thus, Src kinase-dependent phosphorylation of TERT mediates TERT binding to Ran in response to oxidative stress to facilitate nuclear export via the export receptor CRM1. In contrast, inhibition of the tyrosine kinase c-Abl, which was previously shown to phosphorylate and inactivate TERT (31), did not prevent H2O2-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of hTERT (data not shown). Interestingly, tyrosine phosphorylation has been described as a signal for nucleocytoplasmic shuttling for different targets, including transcription factors STAT5 and STAT1 (39, 64) and now for hTERT as reported here. Moreover, we detected localization of src in the nucleus, which further underscored the concept that hTERT tyrosine phosphorylation takes place in the nucleus in a Src kinase family-dependent manner (data not shown). Thus, tyrosine phosphorylation in concert with nuclear localization signals and nuclear export signals makes an important contribution to the cellular localization of proteins.
The activity of TERT is not limited to the extension of telomere ends but also appears to be involved in regulation of apoptosis (3, 7, 15, 27, 38, 45, 61). The molecular mechanism by which TERT regulates apoptosis is not yet clear. It has recently been shown that overexpression of hTERT into fibroblasts prevents oxidative stress-induced apoptosis, but did not inhibit oxidative stress-induced replicative senescence (19). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that hTERT is involved in regulation of apoptosis independent of the preservation of telomere length. This assumption is supported by data from Gonzalez-Suarez, who demonstrated that in keratinocyte-targeted telomerase-transgenic mice, the epidermis is highly responsive to phorbol ester and wound healing is increased, although telomere length is not changed (18). These data suggest that telomerase actively promotes proliferation in cells independent of telomere length. Moreover, these telomerase-transgenic mice showed an increased incidence of spontaneous cancer compared to their wild-type littermates, despite the fact that both wild-type and transgenic mice have very long telomeres (17). In line with these findings, the antiapoptotic capacity of hTERT shown in this study was detected within a few hours after transfection of the hTERT constructs. Thus, hTERT seems to exert its antiapoptotic activity in the nucleus, presumably due to illegitimate healing of DNA breaks (19) and independent of direct telomere elongation (3).
Taken together, our data disclose a mechanism by which exogenous H2O2 as well as endogenous oxidative stress can induce dramatic changes in hTERT localization. Prevention of nuclear export of hTERT by using a nonphosphorylatable Y707 construct or a nuclear targeting vector significantly enhanced the antiapoptotic activity of TERT against ROS-dependent apoptosis induction. Thus, depletion of nuclear hTERT by ROS may amplify cellular sensitivity to apoptosis, irrespective of the effects on telomere length reduction and cellular senescence.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ha 2868/2-1 and SFB 553 Project C21B6). Jörg Hoffmann was supported by a fellowship from the Boehringer Ingelheim Fond.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Blackburn, E. H. 2000. Telomere states and cell fates. Nature 408:53-56.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Blasco, M. A. 2002. Telomerase beyond telomeres. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2:627-633.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Bodnar, A. G., M. Ouellette, M. Frolkis, S. E. Holt, C. P. Chiu, G. B. Morin, C. B. Harley, J. W. Shay, S. Lichtsteiner, and W. E. Wright. 1998. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science 279:349-352.
5. Breitschopf, K., A. M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler. 2001. Proatherosclerotic factors induce telomerase inactivation in endothelial cells through an Akt-dependent mechanism. FEBS Lett. 493:21-25.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Chandra, J., A. Samali, and S. Orrenius. 2000. Triggering and modulation of apoptosis by oxidative stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 29:323-333.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Chin, L., S. E. Artandi, Q. Shen, A. Tam, S. L. Lee, G. J. Gottlieb, C. W. Greider, and R. A. DePinho. 1999. p53 deficiency rescues the adverse effects of telomere loss and cooperates with telomere dysfunction to accelerate carcinogenesis. Cell 97:527-538.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Colgin, L. M., and R. R. Reddel. 1999. Telomere maintenance mechanisms and cellular immortalization. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9:97-103.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Counter, C. M., W. C. Hahn, W. Wei, S. D. Caddle, R. L. Beijersbergen, P. M. Lansdorp, J. M. Sedivy, and R. A. Weinberg. 1998. Dissociation among in vitro telomerase activity, telomere maintenance, and cellular senescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:14723-14728.
10. de Lange, T. 1998. Telomeres. Nature 392:753-754.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Ferrigno, P., F. Posas, D. Koepp, H. Saito, and P. A. Silver. 1998. Regulated nucleo/cytoplasmic exchange of HOG1 MAPK requires the importin beta homologs NMD5 and XPO1. EMBO J. 17:5606-5614.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Finkel, T., and N. J. Holbrook. 2000. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of aging. Nature 408:239-247.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Fischer-Fantuzzi, L., and C. Vesco. 1988. Cell-dependent efficiency of reiterated nuclear signals in a mutant simian virus 40 oncoprotein targeted to the nucleus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:5495-5503.
14. France-Lanord, V., B. Brugg, P. P. Michel, Y. Agid, and M. Ruberg. 1997. Mitochondrial free radical signal in ceramide-dependent apoptosis: a putative mechanism for neuronal death in Parkinson's disease. J. Neurochem. 69:1612-1621.[Medline]
15. Fu, W., J. G. Begley, M. W. Killen, and M. P. Mattson. 1999. Anti-apoptotic role of telomerase in pheochromocytoma cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274:7264-7271.
16. Furumoto, K., E. Inoue, N. Nagao, E. Hiyama, and N. Miwa. 1998. Age-dependent telomere shortening is slowed down by enrichment of intracellular vitamin C via suppression of oxidative stress. Life Sci. 63:935-948.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. González-Suárez, E., J. M. Flores, and M. A. Blasco. 2002. Cooperation between p53 mutation and high telomerase transgenic expression in spontaneous cancer development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7291-7301.
18. Gonzalez-Suarez, E., E. Samper, A. Ramirez, J. M. Flores, J. Martin-Caballero, J. L. Jorcano, and M. A. Blasco. 2001. Increased epidermal tumors and increased skin wound healing in transgenic mice overexpressing the catalytic subunit of telomerase, mTERT, in basal keratinocytes. EMBO J. 20:2619-2630.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Gorbunova, V., A. Seluanov, and O. Pereira-Smith. 2002. Expression of hTERT does not prevent stress-induced senescence in normal human fibroblasts, but protects the cells from stress-induced apoptosis and necrosis. J. Biol. Chem. 277:38540-38549.
20. Greider, C. W., and E. H. Blackburn. 1985. Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in Tetrahymena extracts. Cell 43:405-413.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Greider, C. W., and E. H. Blackburn. 1989. A telomeric sequence in the RNA of Tetrahymena telomerase required for telomere repeat synthesis. Nature 337:331-337.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Griendling, K. K., and D. G. Harrison. 1999. Dual role of reactive oxygen species in vascular growth. Circ. Res. 85:562-563.
23. Griendling, K. K., D. Sorescu, B. Lassegue, and M. Ushio-Fukai. 2000. Modulation of protein kinase activity and gene expression by reactive oxygen species and their role in vascular physiology and pathophysiology. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 20:2175-2183.
24. Haendeler, J., M. Ishida, L. Hunyady, and B. C. Berk. 2000. The third cytoplasmic loop of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor exerts differential effects on extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/ERK2) and apoptosis via Ras- and Rap1-dependent pathways. Circ. Res. 86:729-736.
25. Hanke, J. H., J. P. Gardner, R. L. Dow, P. S. Changelian, W. H. Brissette, E. J. Weringer, B. A. Pollok, and P. A. Connelly. 1996. Discovery of a novel, potent, and Src family-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Study of Lck- and FynT-dependent T cell activation. J. Biol. Chem. 271:695-701.
26. Heller, R. A., and M. Kronke. 1994. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-mediated signaling pathways. J. Cell Biol. 126:5-9.
27. Hemann, M. T., K. L. Rudolph, M. A. Strong, R. A. DePinho, L. Chin, and C. W. Greider. 2001. Telomere dysfunction triggers developmentally regulated germ cell apoptosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:2023-2030.
28. Hemann, M. T., M. A. Strong, L. Y. Hao, and C. W. Greider. 2001. The shortest telomere, not average telomere length, is critical for cell viability and chromosome stability. Cell 107:67-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Holt, S. E., D. L. Aisner, J. Baur, V. M. Tesmer, M. Dy, M. Ouellette, J. B. Trager, G. B. Morin, D. O. Toft, J. W. Shay, W. E. Wright, and M. A. White. 1999. Functional requirement of p23 and Hsp90 in telomerase complex. Genes Dev. 13:817-826.
30. Kang, S. S., T. Kwon, D. Y. Kwon, and S. I. Do. 1999. Akt protein kinase enhances human telomerase activity through phosphorylation of telomerase reverse transcriptase subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 274:13085-13090.
31. Kharbanda, S., V. Kumar, S. Dhar, P. Pandey, C. Chen, P. Majumder, Z. M. Yuan, Y. Whang, W. Strauss, T. K. Pandita, D. Weaver, and D. Kufe. 2000. Regulation of the hTERT telomerase catalytic subunit by the c-Abl tyrosine kinase. Curr. Biol. 10:568-575.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Kudo, N., N. Matsumori, H. Taoka, D. Fujiwara, E. P. Schreiner, B. Wolff, M. Yoshida, and S. Horinouchi. 1999. Leptomycin B inactivates CRM/exportin 1 by covalent modification at a cysteine residue in the central conserved region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:9112-9117.
32. Lee, S.-H., and M. Hannink. 2001. The N-terminal nuclear export sequence of IkBalpha is required for RanGTP-dependent binding to CRM-1. J. Biol. Chem. 276:23599-23606.
33. Li, H., L. Zhao, Z. Yang, J. W. Funder, and J. P. Liu. 1998. Telomerase is controlled by protein kinase Calpha in human breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273:33436-33442.
34. Lindsay, M. E., J. M. Holaska, K. Welch, B. M. Paschal, and I. G. Macara. 2001. Ran-binding protein 3 is a cofactor for CRM1-mediated nuclear protein export. J. Cell. Biol. 153:1391-1402.
35. Liu, J. P. 1999. Studies of the molecular mechanisms in the regulation of telomerase activity. FASEB J. 13:2091-2104.
36. Liu, K., R. J. Hodes, and N.-P. Weng. 2001. Telomerase activation in human T lymphocytes does not require increase in telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) protein but is associated with hTERT phosphorylation and nuclear translocation. J. Immunol. 166:4826-4830.
37. Macara, I. G. 2001. Transport into and out of the nucleus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65:570-594.
38. Mattson, M. P., and W. Klapper. 2001. Emerging roles for telomerase in neuronal development and apoptosis. J. Neurosci. Res. 63:1-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. McBride, K. M., G. Banninger, C. McDonald, and N. C. Reich. 2002. Regulated nuclear import of STAT1 transcription factor by direct binding of importin-alpha. EMBO J. 21:1754-1763.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Meyerson, M., C. M. Counter, E. N. Eaton, L. W. Ellisen, P. Steiner, S. D. Caddle, L. Ziaugra, R. L. Beijersbergen, M. J. Davidoff, Q. Liu, S. Bacchetti, D. A. Haber, and R. A. Weinberg. 1997. hEST2, the putative human telomerase catalytic subunit gene, is up-regulated in tumor cells and during immortalization. Cell 90:785-795.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Minamino, T., and S. Kourembanas. 2001. Mechanisms of telomerase induction during vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Circ. Res. 89:237-243.
42. Nakamura, T. M., and T. R. Cech. 1998. Reversing time: origin of telomerase. Cell 92:587-590.[Medline]
43. Nakielny, S., and G. Dreyfuss. 1999. Transport of proteins and RNAs in and out the nucleus. Cell 99:677-690.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Nordberg, J., and E. S. Arner. 2001. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidants, and the mammalian thioredoxin system. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 31:1287-1312.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Oh, H., G. E. Taffet, K. A. Youker, M. L. Entman, P. A. Overbeek, L. H. Michael, and M. D. Schneider. 2001. Telomerase reverse transcriptase promotes cardiac muscle cell proliferation, hypertrophy, and survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:10308-10313.
46. Paine, P. L., L. C. Moore, and S. B. Horowitz. 1975. Nuclear envelope permeability. Nature 254:109-114.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Parman, T., M. J. Wiley, and P. G. Wells. 1999. Free radical-mediated oxidative DNA damage in the mechanism of thalidomide teratogenicity. Nat. Med. 5:582-585.[CrossRef][Medline]
48. Persic, L., M. Righi, A. Roberts, H. R. Hoogenboom, A. Cattaneo, and A. Bradbury. 1997. Targeting vectors for intracellular immunisation. Gene 187:1-8.[CrossRef][Medline]
49. Rongish, B. J., and W. H. Kinsey. 2000. Transient nuclear localization of Fyn kinase during development in zebrafish. Anat. Rec. 260:115-123.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Rudolph, K. L., S. Chang, M. Millard, N. Schreiber-Agus, and R. A. DePinho. 2000. Inhibition of experimental liver cirrhosis in mice by telomerase gene delivery. Science 287:1253-1258.
51. Ryan, K. J., and S. R. Wente. 2000. The nuclear pore complex: a protein machine bridging the nucleus and cytoplasm. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:361-371.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. Sachdev, S., S. Bagchi, D. D. Zhang, A. C. Mings, and M. Hannink. 2000. Nuclear import of IkB
is accomplished by a Ran-independent transport pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1571-1582.
53. Seimiya, H., H. Sawada, Y. Muramatsu, M. Shimizu, K. Ohko, K. Yamane, and T. Tsuruo. 2000. Involvement of 14-3-3 proteins in nuclear localization of telomerase. EMBO J. 19:2652-2661.[CrossRef][Medline]
54. Seimiya, H., M. Tanji, T. Oh-Hara, A. Tomida, I. Naasani, and T. Tsuruo. 1999. Hypoxia up-regulates telomerase activity via mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in human solid tumor cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 260:365-370.[CrossRef][Medline]
55. Sloan-Lancaster, J., W. Zhang, J. Presley, B. L. Williams, R. T. Abraham, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, and L. E. Samelson. 1997. Regulation of ZAP-70 intracellular localization: visualization with the green fluorescent protein. J. Exp. Med. 186:1713-1724.
56. Suzuki, Y. J., H. J. Forman, and A. Sevanian. 1997. Oxidants as stimulators of signal transduction. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 22:269-285.[CrossRef][Medline]
57. Uetz, P., S. Fumagalli, D. James, and R. Zeller. 1996. Molecular interaction between limb deformity proteins (formins) and Src family kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 271:33525-33530.
58. Vasa, M., K. Breitschopf, A. M. Zeiher, and S. Dimmeler. 2000. Nitric oxide activates telomerase and delays endothelial cell senescence. Circ. Res. 87:540-542.
59. White, C. R., T. A. Brock, L. Y. Chang, J. Crapo, P. Briscoe, D. Ku, W. A. Bradley, S. H. Gianturco, J. Gore, B. A. Freeman et al. 1994. Superoxide and peroxynitrite in atherosclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1044-1048.
60. Wong, J. M., L. Kusdra, and K. Collins. 2002. Subnuclear shuttling of human telomerase induced by transformation and DNA damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:731-736.[CrossRef][Medline]
61. Wong, K. K., S. Chang, S. R. Weiler, S. Ganesan, J. Chaudhuri, C. Zhu, S. E. Artandi, K. L. Rudolph, G. J. Gottlieb, L. Chin, F. W. Alt, and R. A. DePinho. 2000. Telomere dysfunction impairs DNA repair and enhances sensitivity to ionizing radiation. Nat. Genet. 26:85-88.[CrossRef][Medline]
62. Woo, C. H., Y. W. Eom, M. H. Yoo, H. J. You, H. J. Han, W. K. Song, Y. J. Yoo, J. S. Chun, and J. H. Kim. 2000. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha generates reactive oxygen species via a cytosolic phospholipase A2-linked cascade. J. Biol. Chem. 275:32357-32362.
63. Yang, J., E. Chang, A. M. Cherry, C. D. Bangs, Y. Oei, A. Bodnar, A. Bronstein, C. P. Chiu, and G. S. Herron. 1999. Human endothelial cell life extension by telomerase expression. J. Biol. Chem. 274:26141-26148.
64. Zeng, R., Y. Aoki, M. Yoshida, K. Arai, and S. Watanabe. 2002. Stat5B shuttles between cytoplasm and nucleus in a cytokine-dependent and -independent manner. J. Immunol. 168:4567-4575.
65. Zhu, H., W. Fu, and M. P. Mattson. 2000. The catalytic subunit of telomerase protects neurons against amyloid beta-peptide-induced apoptosis. J. Neurochem. 75:117-124.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||