Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2003, p. 5090-5106, Vol. 23, No. 14
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.14.5090-5106.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biology, Åbo Akademi University, BioCity,2 Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, FIN-20520 Turku,4 Department of Biology, Laboratory of Animal Physiology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku,6 Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland,1 Cancer Research Center, Moscow 115478, Russia,3 Laboratory of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 208925
Received 23 October 2002/ Returned for modification 4 December 2002/ Accepted 18 April 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cdk5 is critical for neuronal development, as demonstrated by abnormal corticogenesis and perinatal lethality in cdk5 knockout mice (27) and by abnormal neuronal migration, seizures, and adult lethality in mice deficient in p35, one of the protein activators of cdk5 (4). In addition, cdk5 is important in regulating differentiation and organization of muscle cells (16, 33). Moreover, the induction of cdk5 in rat skeletal muscle after nerve injury was recently reported, suggesting a role for cdk5 in muscle regeneration (8). In addition to its involvement in developing and regenerating muscle tissue, cdk5 is engaged in the neuregulin-mediated expression of AChRs at the NMJs (7). Cdk5 has multiple functions in neuronal tissues. It is involved in regulating neuronal survival, migration, neurite outgrowth, secretion, dopamine signaling, and cytoskeletal dynamics (reviewed in reference 5). However, the mechanisms underlying its regulatory functions in myogenic tissuesand its myogenic substratesare poorly characterized.
Consistent with the proposed organizational functions of cdk5 in the nervous system, cdk5 is found to be associated with cytoskeletal components in neurons (11, 41). Several of its identified substrates are in fact cytoskeletal proteins, such as tau (12, 31), MAP1, and the NF proteins (17, 20, 21, 28, 36). The importance of cdk5 in the regulation of the cytoskeleton is also emphasized by recent findings that link disturbed regulation and hyperactivation of cdk5 to several neuronal diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (1, 18, 24, 32), Parkinson's disease (3), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (2, 25), and more specifically to the cytoskeletal disruptions that are typical of these diseases (28).
The close correspondence of cdk5 and nestin expression patterns at early developmental stages in neuronal and muscle cells, and the established role of cdk5 as an important regulator of cytoskeletal dynamics, led us to explore the possible interaction between nestin and cdk5 in these tissues. Our study shows that, both in vitro and in cultured cells, cdk5 phosphorylated nestin preferentially over its partner IF protein, vimentin, and induced subsequent reorganization of the cytoplasmic nestin network. Furthermore, we observed a spatiotemporal match between the expression and activation of cdk5 and nestin and an association between cdk5 and nestin during early stages of myogenic development, indicating that the interaction between cdk5 and nestin is a characteristic feature at stages of coexpression and that nestin may function as a scaffold for cdk5. Finally, we show that cdk5 is a modulator of nestin organization and dynamics in differentiating myoblasts and that the cdk5-specific phosphorylation of nestin could be involved in the scaffolding or targeting of cdk5 and p35 signaling.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell cultures, plasmids, and transfections. Immortalized CNS ST15A neuronal precursor cells were cultured as described previously (34). For transfection, 2 x 106 cells were grown to 70% confluency, harvested, and resuspended in 400 µl of OPTIMEM reduced-serum medium. Cells were transfected with wild-type cdk5, wild-type cdk5 and p35, dncdk5, dncdk5 and p35, and p35 alone, and a noncoding plasmid was used as a mock control to compensate for possible effects of transfection. The p35, cdk5, and dncdk5 constructs for cell transfections were in pcDNA3.1His vector expressing a six-His tag and an Express epitope. A total of 20 µg of plasmid DNA was used for transfections. Cells were transfected by electroporation at 220 V/cm and 975 µF. Transfected cells were plated on poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips or cell culture dishes and incubated for 48 to 60 h before experiments. Mouse C2C12 myoblasts were cultured in Ham's F12 and DMEM (ratio, 1:1) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 2 mM glutamine. To induce differentiation, cells were plated at a density of 1 x 104 to 5 x 104 cells/cm2 on plastic dishes or coverslips and grown for 2 days before replacing growth medium with differentiation medium (DMEM supplemented with 2% fetal calf serum and 2 mM glutamine). Inhibition of cdk5 activity in differentiating C2C12 myoblasts was performed by culturing cells in differentiating medium in the presence of 10 µM of either of the cdk5 inhibitors, roscovitine or BL-I. The cells were incubated for 12 h in the presence of the inhibitor. For transfection, myoblasts were grown to 50 to 70% confluency, harvested, and resuspended in OPTIMEM2 x 106 cells in 400 µl of OPTIMEM per sample. Cells were transfected with wild-type cdk5, wild-type cdk5 and p35, dncdk5, dncdk5 and p35, p35 alone (21), and empty plasmid as a control for the possible effects of transfection. At 24 h after transfection, the cells were induced to differentiate by replacing the growth medium with differentiation medium. The transfection efficiencies varied between 20 and 30% for ST15A cells and between 5 to 10% for C2C12 myoblasts.
Antibodies. The nestin antibodies used were a monoclonal antibody (Invitrogen) and a polyclonal antibody against nestin (34) and a phosphopeptide antibody generated as described previously (34). Cdk5 was recognized by a polyclonal antibody (C-8) purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Three different antibodies were used to recognize p35the polyclonal antibodies, N-20 and C-19 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and a monoclonal p35 antibody (clones ES19 and ES24) purchased from Sigma. Specific cdk5- and p35-blocking peptides, respectively, obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology were used to test for specificity of the immunoreactions. An anti-Express antibody recognizing the Express epitope expressed in the pcDNA3.1His vector was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. A monoclonal actin antibody was purchased from Sigma.
Separation of IF fractions following extraction with Triton X-100. Triton X-100 buffer (25 mM HEPES [pH 7.6], 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM EGTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors) was added to cultured C2C12 cells at different time points of differentiation; cells were detached and collected, homogenized on ice, and centrifuged for 15,000 x g at 4°C for 45 min. The supernatant and the pellet fractions were dissolved in 3x Laemmli sample buffer for further SDS-PAGE and Western blotting analyses.
Animals and in situ injury. A total of 30 13- to 14-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats weighing between 420 and 640 g were used. The in situ injury was induced by microsyringe injection of 2.0 µg of notexin toxin (phospholipase A2; volume, 20 µl) to the lateral gastrognemius muscle of the left hind limb. The right muscle was left to serve as an intact control. As a sham control, 0.9% NaCl was injected into the right gastrognemius in half of the rats. The injuries were induced under quick ether anesthesia. Animals were allowed to move freely in their cages after the injury. Animals were killed by neck dislocation at 6, 12, or 24 h or at 2, 3, 5, 7, 21, or 28 days after injury. After sacrifice, the traumatized muscle was divided sagittally across the lesion into two samples. One sample was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for biochemical analysis. The other sample was either fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer per liter and embedded in paraffin or else was fresh frozen in isopentane cooled with liquid nitrogen. Frozen samples were stored at -70°C until processed further.
The following antisera and antibodies were used: rabbit polyclonal antinestin antiserum 130 or mouse monoclonal antibody to rat nestin (Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif.). NMJs were demonstrated by toxin histochemistry, which was performed by incubating frozen sections overnight in 1:200 BTX (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.), which specifically binds to AChRs. The bound primary antibodies were visualized by using the appropriate avidin-biotin-peroxidase kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.), which was also used for visualization of BTX.
IF preparations, in vitro phosphorylation of nestin, and phosphoamino acid analysis.
IFs were isolated from ST15A cells as described previously (34). For further cycles of disassembly and reassembly, reassembled IFs were recovered by centrifugation at 100,000 x g for 30 min. The filaments were solubilized in dissociation buffer containing urea (as described in reference 34). Following centrifugation at 14,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C, the supernatant was dialyzed into two changes of 500 volumes each of PBS containing 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, and protease inhibitors. IF preparations were phosphorylated with the activated cdk5 and p35 complex. For the reconstitution assay, 10 µl of bacterially expressed p35 and cdk5 (21) (stored in 20 mM Tris [pH 7.4] and 5% glycerol at -70°C), was mixed with 6 µl of 10x PBS, 2 µl of 1 mM EDTA and 1 mM DTT, and H2O to make 60 µl of the mix. The mix was incubated at 30°C for 2 h. Twenty microliters of IF preparation (nestin, 100 µg/ml; vimentin, 1,000 µg/ml) was phosphorylated with 5 µl of the reaction mix, 20 µl of kinase buffer (50 mM MOPS [pH 7.4], 5 mM MgCl2), 100 µM ATP, 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, protease inhibitors, and H2O to achieve a final volume of 50 µl. The kinase reaction was carried out at 30°C and stopped after 1 h by the addition of 3x Laemmli sample buffer. Phosphoamino acid analysis of the phosphorylated IF proteins was performed as described previously (34). In the text of this article, phosphorylation "in vitro" refers to phosphorylation of a purified substrate with purified kinase in the test tube. The term "in vivo" refers to metabolic phosphorylation inside the intact living cell. Therefore, in this context, "in vivo" does not refer to events in the intact animal.
Double-immunofluorescence confocal microscopy.
For double-label immunofluorescence experiments, cells were grown on coverslips. Cells were fixed and blocked as described previously (34) before incubation with monoclonal nestin antibody (Invitrogen) diluted 1:50 and either polyclonal cdk5 or p35 antibody (concentration, 4 µg/ml) for 30 min at room temperature, rinsed 3 times in PBS, and incubated with Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse Igs (Molecular Probes) and Alexa 546 anti-rabbit Igs (Molecular Probes). Cells were finally washed three times in PBS before being mounted in Mowiol 40-88 (32 459-0; Aldrich-Chemie, Steinheim, Germany) supplemented with 100 mg of 1.4.-diazabicyclo [2.2.2]-octan per ml (2780-2; Aldrich-Chemie). The fluorescence images were analyzed with a Leica TCS-SP confocal laser scanning microscope system (Leica, Heidelberg, Germany) equipped with an Ar-Kr laser (Omnichrome; Melels Griot, Carslbad, Calif.). Fluorophores were sequentially excited with wavelength peaks at 488 and 568 nm. Fluorescence detection windows were at
493 to 565 nm and
590 to 690 nm, respectively. Images stacks were acquired and processed into maximum projection images with Leica TCS NT/SP Scanware (version 1.6.587) software.
Western blotting. For Western blotting of transfected cell samples, equal amounts of protein were loaded on SDS-10% PAGE under reducing conditions and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking overnight at 4°C in 5% milk-PBS, membranes were probed at room temperature for 1 h with primary antibodies in 1% milk-PBS and 0.1% Tween 20; the membranes were then washed four times with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated with secondary antibodies coupled to horseradish peroxidase (at dilutions recommended by the manufacturer) and visualized by using an enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection kit (Amersham, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). For immunoblotting of muscle samples, protein extracts were prepared as described previously (40).
Immunocomplex kinase assay. Transfected cells were washed twice with cold PBS. Cells (4 x 106 per sample) were lysed with 600 µl of IP buffer (PBS [pH 7.4]; 1% NP-40; 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; 1 mM EDTA; 1 mM EGTA; 20 mM NaF; 1 mM PMSF; 10 µg of aprotinin, 10 µg of leupeptin, and 10 µg of pepstatin; and 0.5 mM DTT) for 30 min on ice. The samples were homogenized eight times with a 26-gauge needle and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The protein concentration was determined by using the Bradford assay, and the samples were normalized accordingly. Five microliters of anti-cdk5 IgG was added to the cell lysates. The samples were incubated with rotation at 4°C for 1 h followed by 30 min with protein A Sepharose. Complexes were washed three times with kinase buffer (100 mM HEPES [pH 7.0], 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MnCl2, 10 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 60 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 30 mM p-nitrophenylphosphate). The Sepharose A pellets were resuspended in 20 µl of kinase buffer containing H1 (100 µg/ml) or 20 µl of IF preparation (nestin, 10 µg/ml) in IF kinase buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.2], 60 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 2.5 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2). Five microliters of 5x ATP mix (1 mCi of [32P]ATP per ml and 125 µM cold ATP in kinase buffer) was added to start the reactions. Samples were incubated at 30°C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 3x sample buffer and boiled for 5 min. The samples were further centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 5 min and run on SDS-PAGE.
In vivo labeling and IP. Control and cdk5- and p35-cotransfected ST15A cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate 48 h after transfection, and the cell lysate was prepared as described previously (34). Nestin was immunoprecipitated by dilution of the cell lysate with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer without SDS (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 140 mM NaCl, 10 mM pyrophosphate, 5 mM EDTA, 0.4% NP-40, 100 mM PMSF, 10 µg of leupeptin per ml and 10 µg of antipain per ml) added to the polyclonal antinestin antibody 6 (34), and finally recovered with protein A Sepharose. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Gels were stained with either Coomassie brilliant blue or silver to control for equal loading of proteins; the gels were then dried and autoradiographed at -70°C by using Kodak X-Omat AR. For coimmunoprecipitation, cdk5- and p35-transfected or untransfected ST15A cells and differentiating C2C12 cells were lysed in IP buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 140 mM NaCl, 10 mM pyrophosphate, 5 mM EDTA, 0.4% NP-40, 100 mM PMSF, 10 µg of leupeptin per ml, and 10 µg of antipain per ml) for 30 min on ice. The lysate was lightly sonicated and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm (Eppendorf centrifuge 5417R) for 10 min. The supernatant was precleared with protein G and protein A Sepharose beads, respectively. Then, nestin and cdk5 were immunoprecipitated by monoclonal antinestin antibody or polyclonal cdk5 antibody and recovered with protein G Sepharose or protein A Sepharose. For negative controls, the lysate was incubated with Sepharose G beads or Sepharose A beads and mouse IgG or rabbit IgG, respectively. The immunoprecipitate was then immunoblotted for cdk5 or nestin.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Cdk5 is associated with nestin in neuronal progenitor ST15A cells. Cdk5 was coimmunoprecipitated with nestin from ST15A cells, demonstrating that cdk5 is associated with the nestin network at endogenous protein levels (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, immunoblotting of IF preparations with antibodies against cdk5 showed the presence of cdk5 in these preparations (Fig. 2B). IFs that have been depolymerized by urea are able to spontaneously polymerize when the urea is removed and a small amount of salt is added. Cdk5 cocycled with the IFs through two repeated cycles of assembly-disassembly-reassembly (Fig. 2B). The cdk5 associated with the IFs is not active, as shown by the lack of background phosphorylation of IF preparations (Fig. 1A). The in vitro data on retained nestin-cdk5 complexes after disassembly-assembly cycles corroborates a firm association between nestin and cdk5.
|
|
|
Undifferentiated myoblasts expressed nestin and very low levels of cdk5 and p35, as shown by immunoblotting (Fig. 5A). Between 24 and 36 h of differentiation, cdk5 and p35 levels were elevated, corresponding to the increased expression of the muscle differentiation marker myogenin and a slight increase in nestin expression (Fig. 5A). The increasing expression of cdk5 and p35 was associated with increased kinase activity, as shown by in vitro kinase assays (Fig. 3A). At this time, the cells showed morphological changes that are typical of differentiating cells, i.e., they became elongated and were aligned in a parallel manner (data not shown). Cdk5 kinase activity peaked at 36 to 48 h of differentiation and was then reduced at 72 h (Fig. 5A), when multinucleated myotubes had formed (data not shown). Although the cdk5 activity had declined at 72 h of differentiation, the myotubes still expressed high levels of cdk5. The decrease in cdk5 activity at 72 h corresponded to down-regulation of the cdk5 activator, p35 (Fig. 5A).
|
While nestin expression in the fully developed muscle is down-regulated to levels below the limit of immunoblot-based detection, nestin immunoreactivity remains at the NMJs in tissue sections of the adult rat muscle (39). Interestingly, the small amount of remaining nestin in adult muscle is coexpressed with p35 at the NMJs, as shown by immunohistochemical analysis (Fig. 5C). BTX, which binds specifically to AChRs, was used to identify NMJs (Fig. 5C). Similar results were obtained with cdk5 (data not shown). This analysis shows that the association between nestin and the cdk5 and p35 complex also remains during the adult stages of very low nestin expression.
Cdk5 is associated with nestin in differentiating myoblasts. In addition to the temporal agreement of the expression profiles of cdk5 and nestin during cell culture and in situ myogenesis, we wanted to determine whether these two proteins were also physically associated with each other. To this end, we tested whether cdk5 would colocalize with nestin and whether it would be associated with nestin in coimmunoprecipitation analysis of differentiating myoblasts. The spatial coorganization of cdk5 and nestin was demonstrated by high magnification confocal microscopy of double-labeled myoblasts at 48 h of differentiation (Fig. 6A). Cdk5 colocalized with nestin along nestin filaments and in larger aggregate-like structures. Cdk5 also coimmunoprecipitated along with nestin and vice versa in C2C12 cells at 24, 48, and 72 h of differentiation, as demonstrated by immunoblotting of the precipitates with nestin and cdk5 antibodies (Fig. 6B).
|
|
Successful transfection of C2C12 myoblasts was obtained only with undifferentiated proliferating cells. This limitation hampers detailed examination of causes and consequences, as the activation of cdk5 will be blocked prior to cdk5-mediated changes in nestin organization occurring later during differentiation. This implies that it is not possible to determine whether the loss of nestin organization is a specific effect of inhibited cdk5 or a secondary effect due to the abolished differentiation. In order to examine the effects on nestin organization induced by the inhibition of cdk5 activity at stages of differentiation when cells are already undergoing differentiation, we employed roscovitine and BL-I, both commonly used cdk5 inhibitors. At 48 and 60 h, control cells showed clear signs of differentiation, including elongated morphology and fusion of cells. At this stage, nestin showed a diffuse pattern with parallel arrays of filaments (Fig. 7C) compared to the extended network seen in undifferentiated myoblasts (Fig. 7A). In roscovitine-treated cells, the nestin network was condensed into large cytoplasmic aggregates (Fig. 7C). Treatment with BL-I yielded identical results (data not shown).
In order to confirm that the cdk5 inhibitor had affected nestin phosphorylation, we examined the phosphorylation of nestin at Thr-316 at these time points. Whole-cell extracts of roscovitine-treated and untreated C2C12 myoblasts were subjected to immunoblotting with antibodies against nestin phosphorylated at Thr-316. The samples were equalized with respect to nestin in order to determine changes in phosphorylation. Nestin showed very low constitutive phosphorylation at Thr-316 in proliferating C2C12 myoblasts. At 48 and 60 h of differentiation, phosphorylation at Thr-316 was increased (Fig. 7D). Treatment with the cdk5 inhibitor roscovitine led to decreased phosphorylation of Thr-316 at 48 and 60 h of differentiation, corresponding to the disruption of the nestin network (Fig. 7D). Identical results were obtained by using the other cdk5 inhibitor, BL-I (data not shown). These results further demonstrate the involvement of cdk5 in the phosphorylation-mediated regulation of nestin during differentiation of C2C12 cells.
Nestin phosphorylation at Thr-316 is associated with the soluble fraction. In order to examine the effect of nestin phosphorylation on the assembly and subcellular distribution of cdk5 and p35, Triton X-100 extraction of differentiating myoblasts was performed, and the soluble and pellet fractions were immunoblotted with nestin, pThr-316 nestin, and cdk5- and p35 antibodies (Fig. 8). The immunoblots showed an increase in nestin solubility during differentiation that was associated with phosphorylation of nestin at Thr-316 (Fig. 8). Phosphorylation of nestin at Thr-316 was exclusively associated with the soluble fraction (Fig. 8), indicating that phosphorylation of this site is involved in regulating the disassembly of nestin filaments. We have previously shown that mitotic reorganization of nestin is accompanied by increased phosphorylation at Thr-316 with subsequent disassembly of nestin (34).
|
Interestingly, immunoblotting with antibodies against cdk5 and p35 showed that, whereas cdk5 is present in both the soluble and the insoluble fraction, p35 is present only in the insoluble fraction, demonstrating that p35 is not associated with nestin that is phosphorylated at Thr-316 (Fig. 8). During differentiation, the amount of cdk5 in the soluble pool remained constant, whereas the amount of cdk5 associated with the cytoskeletal fraction increased (Fig. 8).
The interaction between p35 and nestin is regulated by cdk5 activity. Cdk5 and protein activators of cdk5, such as p35, p25, and p39, have been shown to be associated with cytoskeletal components in neurons (12, 14, 17, 41). However, no significant association between p35 and nestin was seen in differentiating myoblasts at 48 h, as demonstrated by double-label immunofluorescence and coimmunoprecipitation analysis (Fig. 9). Interestingly, when cdk5 was inhibited with roscovitine, an increased association between p35 and nestin could be observed (Fig. 9), indicating that the interaction between p35 and nestin is regulated by cdk5 activity. In contrast, the interaction between cdk5 and nestin appears not to be dependent on the activity of cdk5, as cdk5 was associated with nestin in IF preparations from CNS progenitor cells (Fig. 2) exhibiting no detectable cdk5 activity (Fig. 1A).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cdk5 is a bona fide nestin kinase in vitro and in vivo. Phosphorylation of IF preparations showed that cdk5 almost exclusively phosphorylates nestin over the partner IF protein, vimentin (Fig. 1). This was a surprising observation, since the cyclin-dependent serine and threonine kinases phosphorylate similar motifs on different IF proteins, and vimentin contains an SP consensus site (Ser-55) for proline-directed kinases, which could serve as a recognition site for cdk5. The specificity for nestin was further emphasized in vivo in transfected cells, in which overexpression of cdk5 and p35 in neuronal progenitor cells (Fig. 4A) and in myoblasts (Fig. 7) had prominent effects on nestin phosphorylation and organization, whereas the other major cytoskeletal components appeared to be unaffected (Fig. 4B). In view of the copolymerization of nestin and vimentin during filament formation, the disruption of nestin organization could have been anticipated to have effects on the vimentin network as well. On the other hand, based on the in vitro and in vivo phosphorylation data, cdk5 was not predicted to have a direct effect on vimentin, as it specifically phosphorylated nestin, whereas vimentin showed only minor phosphorylation by cdk5. Expression of a rod end deletion mutant nestin in vimentin-expressing nestin-free cells has been shown to affect the vimentin organization only mildly (22). The mutated nestin became incorporated into the vimentin network, albeit in an abnormal discontinuous fashion without altering vimentin organization, thus indicating that major organizational changes of nestin may occur without necessarily affecting its IF partner (22).
We have identified Thr-316 as an in vitro cdk5 phosphorylation site on nestin. The involvement of cdk5 in phosphorylating Thr-316 in vivo was supported by the increase in Thr-316 phosphorylation of native IF preparations phosphorylated by cdk5 in vitro (Fig. 1D), by the increase in phosphorylation of Thr-316 in cultured cells overexpressing cdk5 and p35, and by the decreased phosphorylation at this site in differentiating myoblasts treated with the cdk5 inhibitor roscovitine (Fig. 7D and 8). Thr-316 is a consensus site for cyclin-dependent kinases, and we have previously shown that the mitotic cdc2 kinase phosphorylates nestin at this site during mitosis with a subsequent increase in nestin solubility (34). The involvement of cdk5 in the regulation of nestin dynamics in vivo in differentiating myoblasts was followed by using the antibody specific for phospho-Thr-316. Cdk5 was demonstrated to phosphorylate nestin at Thr-316 during differentiation of myoblasts, and phosphorylation at this site was associated with increased nestin solubility. The diffuse nestin immunolabeling in cdk5- and p35-transfected C2C12 myoblasts indicates that the nestin network is disassembled, whereas nestin still appears to be filamentous in ST15A cells overexpressing cdk5 and p35. The difference of the in vivo filament organization in these cells is probably related to other posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation at different sites and/or regulation by interactions with associated proteins. In addition to the used Thr-316 indicator site for cdk5 activity, the cdk5-mediated regulation of nestin is likely to be rather complex and involve several other phosphorylation sites, as has been shown for the NFs that contain numerous KSP repeats that are phosphorylated by cdk5 (28, 36). The identified phosphorylation sites, Thr-1495 and Thr-316, are not the only targets for cdk5, as demonstrated by phosphoamino acid analysis, which showed strong phosphorylation of serine residues on nestin phosphorylated in vitro by cdk5 and by the presence of additional tryptic phosphopeptides from nestin phosphorylated in vitro by cdk5 (Fig. 1B and C).
Association of nestin and cdk5implications of nestin as a cdk5 and p35 scaffold. We show that cdk5 is physically associated with nestin in differentiating myoblasts, as demonstrated by immunocomplex assays and double-immunofluorescence labeling (Fig. 6). The close association between nestin and cdk5 raises the possibility that cdk5 regulates nestin; on the other hand, nestin could participate in targeting and regulation of cdk5 in myogenic cells. The intracellular localization of p35 also depends on factors regulating its degradation. Phosphorylation of p35 by the activated cdk5 plays an autoregulatory role in the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of p35 (29, 30). The rapid turnover of p35 may be a normal mechanism to prevent the formation of the more stable, abnormally active cdk5. The results on the interaction between nestin and p35 (Fig. 8 and 9) imply that a cdk5-mediated autoregulatory turnover loop is likely to take place on nestin. The observed association of p35 with nestin after cdk5 inhibitionand the fact that p35 was not associated with nestin phosphorylated at Thr-316implies that there would be cdk5-dependent turnover of p35 on the nestin-cdk5 complex. In fact, the degradation of p35 in differentiating myoblasts is inhibited by roscovitine treatment. Although roscovitine and BL-I are inhibitors that could possibly also affect cdks other than cdk5, our collected data indicate that the effects of the inhibitors were indeed mediated by cdk5 inhibition. Taken together, the results regarding the interaction between nestin and p35 and cdk5 indicate that nestin could serve as an organizing molecule or scaffold for cdk5 and p35 signaling. A model for the interaction between cdk5 and nestin during myogenic development is shown in Fig. 10.
|
Physiological relevance of nestin phosphorylation by cdk5. In addition to the suggested role in regulating nestin dynamics and cdk5 activity, the cdk5-mediated phosphorylation of nestin during myogenic differentiation may serve other functions as well. Our data show that phosphorylation of nestin by cdk5 is associated with increased solubility of nestin. In addition, cdk5 could be either directly or indirectly involved in regulating nestin turnover. Degradation via ubiquitination in a phosphorylation-modulated fashion was recently shown for keratins 8 and 18 (15). Nestin expression is down-regulated during differentiation, and nestin is replaced by other IF proteins in the adult organism. The lower-molecular-weight bands in the nestin immunoblots of differentiating C2C12 cells could reflect degradation of nestin. In fact, we have data that indicate that nestin is ubiquitinated in a phosphorylation-dependent manner during myogenic differentiation (T. He, C. Sahlgren, and J. E. Eriksson, unpublished observations). Cdk5 could also be involved in regulating the interaction between nestin and other IF proteins or other cytoskeletal components. A role for nestin as a linker protein interconnecting the cytoskeletal systems has recently been proposed (10, 38), and phosphorylation may be an important regulator of the dynamics of such interactions during myogenic development. The binding of NFs to microtubules has been shown to be inhibited by phosphorylation of NFs by cdk5 (23). These issues remain to be elucidated in forthcoming studies.
Although the exact physiological role of the interaction between cdk5 and nestin during the early stages of neuronal and myogenic development needs to be explored in greater detail, the results from this study demonstrate an important and novel link between cdk5 and nestin. The presence of a nestin-cdk5 complex is likely to have ramifications both in regulating nestin organization and in targeting the activity of p35 and cdk5 signaling. Taken together, we propose that the relationship between cdk5 and nestin is an intrinsic feature of myogenic differentiation and that cdk5 is involved in regulating nestin dynamics and organization during myogenic development.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by the Academy of Finland (Research Council for Environment and Natural Resources, grant 44191), the Erna and Victor Hasselblad Foundation, and the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation. C.M.S. was supported by the Turku Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bajaj, N. P., S. T. al-Sarraj, P. N. Leigh, V. Anderson, and C. C. Miller. 1999. Cyclin dependent kinase-5 (CDK-5) phosphorylates neurofilament heavy (NF-H) chain to generate epitopes for antibodies that label neurofilament accumulations in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and is present in affected motor neurones in ALS. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 23:833-850.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Brion, J. P., and A. M. Couck. 1995. Cortical and brainstem-type Lewy bodies are immunoreactive for the cyclin-dependent kinase 5. Am. J. Pathol. 147:1465-1476.[Abstract]
4. Chae, T., Y. T. Kwon, R. Bronson, P. Dikkes, E. Li, and T. H. Tsai. 1997. Mice lacking p35, a neuronal specific activator of Cdk5, display cortical lamination defects, seizures, and adult lethality. Neuron 18:29-42.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Dhavan, R., and L. H. Tsai. 2000. A decade of cdk5. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:749-759.
6. Frisen, J., C. B. Johansson, C. Török, M. Risling, and U. Lendahl. 1995. Rapid, widespread and longlasting induction of nestin contributes to the generation of glial scar tissue after CNS injury. J. Cell Biol. 131:453-464.
7. Fu, A. K., W. Y. Fu, J. Cheung, K. W. Tsim, F. C. Ip, J. H. Wang, and N. Y. Ip. 2001. Cdk5 is involved in neuregulin-induced AChR expression at the neuromuscular junction. Nat. Neurosci. 4:374-381.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Fu, W. Y., A. K Fu, K. C. Lok, F. C. Ip, and N. Y. Ip. 2002. Induction of Cdk5 activity in rat skeletal muscle after nerve injury. Neuroreport 13:243-247.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Grant, P., P. Sharma, and H. C. Pant. 2001. Cyclin dependent protein kinase 5 (cdk5) and the regulation of neurofilament metabolism. Eur. J. Biochem. 268:1534-1546.[Medline]
10. Herrmann, H., and A. Aebi. 2000. Intermediate filaments and their associates: multi-talented structural elements specifying cytoarchitecture and cytodynamics. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12:79-90.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Humbert, S., R. Dhavan, and L. Tsai. 2000. p39 activates cdk5 in neurons, and is associated with the actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci. 113:975-983.[Abstract]
12. Ishiguro, K., S. Kobayashi, A. Omori, M. Takamatsu, S. Yonekura, K. Anzai, K. Imahori, and T. Uchida. 1994. Identification of the 23 kDa subunit of tau protein kinase II as a putative activator of cdk5 in bovine brain. FEBS Lett. 342:203-208.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Kachinsky, A. M., J. A. Dominov, and J. B. Miller. 1994. Myogenesis and the intermediate filament protein, nestin. Dev. Biol. 165:216-228.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Kobayashi, S., K. Ishiguro, A. Omori, M. Takamatsu, M. Arioka, K. Imahori, and T. Uchida. 1993. A cdc2-related kinase PSSALRE/cdk5 is homologous with the 30 kDa subunit of tau protein kinase II, a proline-directed protein kinase associated with microtubule. FEBS Lett. 335:171-175.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Ku, N. O., and M. B. Omary. 1996. Keratins turn over by ubiquitination in a phosphorylation-modulated fashion. J. Cell Biol. 149:547-552.
16. Lazaro, J. B., M. Kitzmann, M. A. Poul, M. Vandromme, N. J. Lamb, and A. Fernandez. 1997. Cyclin dependent kinase 5, cdk5, is a positive regulator of myogenesis in mouse C2 cells. J. Cell Sci. 110:1251-1260.[Abstract]
17. Lee, K. Y., and R. N. Johnston. 1997. Neurofilaments are part of the high molecular weight complex containing neuronal cdc2-like kinase (nclk). Brain Res. 773:197-202.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Lee, M. S., Y. T. Kwon, M. Li, J. Peng, R. M. Friedlander, and L. H. Tsai. 2000. Neurotoxicity induces cleavage of p35 to p25 by calpain. Nature 405:360-364.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Lendahl, U., L. Zimmerman, and R. D. G. McKay. 1990. CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament proteins. Cell 60:585-595.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Lew, J., R. Winkfein, H. Paudel, and J. H. Wang. 1992. Brain proline-directed protein kinase is a neurofilament kinase which displays high sequence homology to p34cdc2. J. Biol. Chem. 267:25922-25926.
21. Li, B., S. L. Zhang, J. Gu, N. D. Amin, and H. C. Pant. 2000. Integrin
1/ß1-mediated activation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 activity is involved in neurite outgrowth and human neurofilament protein H Lys-Ser-Pro tail domain phosphorylation. J. Neurosci. 20:6055-6062.
22. Marvin, M. J., J. Dahlstrand, U. Lendahl, and R. D. McKay. 1998. A rod end deletion in the intermediate filament protein nestin alters its subcellular localization in neuroepithelial cells of transgenic mice. J. Cell Sci. 111:1951-1961.
23. Miyasaka, H., S. Okabe, K. Ishiguro, T. Uchida, and N. Hirokawa. 1993. Interaction of the tail domain of high molecular weight subunits of neurofilaments with the COOH-terminal region of tubulin and its regulation by
protein kinase II. J. Biol. Chem. 268:22695-22702.
24. Nath, R., M. Davis, A. W. Probert, N. C. Kupina, X. Ren, G. P. Schielke, and K. K. Wang. 2000. Processing of cdk5 activator p35 to its truncated form (p25) by calpain in acutely injured neuronal cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 274:16-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Nguyen, M. D., R. C. Lariviere, and J. Julien. 2001. Deregulation of cdk5 in a mouse model of ALS: toxicity alleviated by perikaryal neurofilament inclusions. Neuron 30:135-147.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Nikolic, M., H. Dudek, Y. T. Kwon, Y. F. Ramos, and L. H. Tsai. 1996. The cdk5/p35 kinase is essential for neurite outgrowth during neuronal differentiation. Genes Dev. 10:816-825.
27. Ohshima, T., J. M. Ward, C. G. Huh, G. Longenecker, Veeranna, H. C. Pant, R. O. Brady, L. J. Martin, and A. B. Kulkarni. 1996. Targeted disruption of the cyclin-dependent kinase 5 gene results in abnormal corticogenesis, neuronal pathology and perinatal death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:11173-11178.
28. Pant, A. C., Veeranna, H. C. Pant, and N. Amin. 1997. Phosphorylation of human high molecular weight neurofilament protein (hNF-H) by neuronal cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (cdk5). Brain Res. 765:259-266.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Patrick, G. N., P. Zhou, Y. T. Kwon, P. M. Howley, and L. H. Tsai. 1998. p35, the neuronal-specific activator of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5) is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway J. Biol. Chem. 273:24057-24064.
30. Patrick, G. N., L. Zukerberg, M. Nikolic, S. de la Monte, P. Dikkes, and L. H. Tsai. 1999. Conversion of p35 to p25 deregulates Cdk5 activity and promotes neurodegeneration. Nature 402:615-622.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Paudel, H. K. 1997. Phosphorylation by neuronal cdc2-like protein kinase promotes dimerization of
protein in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 272:28328-28334.
32. Pei, J. J., I. Grundke-Iqbal, K. Iqbal, N. Bogdanovic, B. Winblad, and R. F. Cowburn. 1998. Accumulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (cdk5) in neurons with early stages of Alzheimer's disease neurofibrillary degeneration. Brain Res. 797:267-277.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Philpott, A., E. B. Porro, M. W. Kirschner, and L. H. Tsai. 1997. The role of cyclin-dependent kinase 5 and a novel regulatory subunit in regulating muscle differentiation and patterning. Genes Dev. 11:1409-1421.
34. Sahlgren, C. M., A. Mikhailov, J. Hellman, Y.-H. Chou, U. Lendahl, R. D. Goldman, and J. E. Eriksson. 2001. Mitotic reorganization of the intermediate filament protein nestin involves phosphorylation by cdc2-kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 276:16456-16463.
35. Sejersen, T., and U. Lendahl. 1993. Transient expression of the intermediate filament nestin during skeletal muscle development. J. Cell Sci. 106:1291-1300.[Abstract]
36. Sharma, P., J. J. Barchi, X. Huang, N. D. Amin, H. Jaffe, and H. C. Pant. 1998. Site-specific phosphorylation of Lys-Ser-Pro repeat peptides from neurofilament H by cyclin-dependent kinase 5: structural basis for substrate recognition. Biochemistry 37:4759-4766.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Sjoberg, G., W. Q. Jiang, N. R. Ringertz, U. Lendahl, and T. Sejersen. 1994. Colocalization of nestin and vimentin/desmin in skeletal muscle cells demonstrated by three-dimensional fluorescence digital imaging microscopy. Exp. Cell Res. 214:447-458.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Steinert, P. M., Y. H. Chou, V. Prahlad, D. A. Parry, L. N. Marekov, K. C. Wu, S. I. Jang, and R. D. Goldman. 1999. A high molecular weight intermediate filament-associated protein in BHK-21 cells is nestin, a type VI intermediate filament protein. Limited co-assembly in vitro to form heteropolymers with type III vimentin and type IV
-internexin. J. Biol. Chem. 274:9881-9890.
39. Vaittinen, S., R. Lukka, C. M. Sahlgren, J. Rantanen, T. Hurme, U. Lendahl, J. E. Eriksson, and H. Kalimo. 1999. Specific and innervation-regulated expression of the intermediate filament nestin at neuromuscular and myotendinous junctions i