Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2003, p. 5664-5679, Vol. 23, No. 16
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.16.5664-5679.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Carolina Cardiovascular Biology Center,1 Departments of Medicine,2 Pharmacology,3 Cell and Developmental Biology,4 Genetics,5 Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,7 Department of Cardiology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany6
Received 20 December 2002/ Returned for modification 3 March 2003/ Accepted 20 May 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
During the earliest stages of mammalian development, endothelial cells arise from precursors located both in the extraembryonic compartment and within the embryo proper. Differentiation of endothelial cells from precursors occurs in close proximity to primitive hematopoeitic cells in structures called blood islands, and it is widely accepted that a population of bipotential cells in the early developing embryo can give rise to both hematopoietic (32) and endothelial (71) cell lineages (and possibly also some smooth muscle cell populations as well [20, 27; P. Carmeliet, Comment, Nature 408:43, 45, 2000]). These cells are termed hemangioblasts and can be identified by the presence of fetal liver kinase 1 (flk-1, also known as vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor 2) and other markers (46). Persistent expression of flk-1 in these cells is associated with differentiation along the endothelial cell lineage, whereas loss of flk-1 expression characterizes differentiating hematopoietic progeny (70). During mouse embryonic development, hemangioblasts are initially located in the aorto-gonadal-mesonephric (AGM) region and in the yolk sac. Yolk sac-derived hemangioblasts are the source of primitive hematopoietic and endothelial cells that express some but not all markers of mature endothelium and that form a primitive vasculature (11, 12). Precursor cells within the AGM region are also fated to give rise to hematopoietic and endothelial cell lineages (47). The AGM region hosts hemangioblasts (54); it is a source of the definitive hematopoietic system and contributes to the definitive vasculature in the mouse embryo (40). The molecular events that determine the generation and differentiation of endothelial cell precursors are not well defined at present.
A number of signaling pathways downstream of endothelial cell differentiationnotably, those activated by members of the vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin familyhave been implicated in vascular patterning (22). In addition, positive and negative cell surface markers are available for the characterization of embryonic endothelial cells and their precursors; among them are flk-1 (which decorates hemangioblasts and all endothelial cells) and PECAM and VE-cadherin (which identify more mature endothelial cells) (18). In contrast, upstream signaling molecules and transcription factors that trigger mesodermal differentiation toward the vascular endothelial cell lineage are less well understood. Notably, recent studies have indicated a necessary role for Indian hedgehog, a secreted ligand for the Patched receptor, in blood island formation and endothelial cell precursor specification (8, 19); however, the effects of Indian hedgehog are not specific to the vasculature, and other signals must surely cooperate with Indian hedgehog signaling to establish the cues necessary to recruit vascular progenitors from their mesodermal precursors.
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) represent another family of signaling molecules that have been implicated, albeit less directly, in hematopoietic and endothelial cell differentiation. BMPs are members of the transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) superfamily of proteins, which consists of more than 30 members classified into several subgroups according to their structural features. Signaling events mediated by these proteins are tightly regulated and play crucial roles in embryonic development. In Drosophila, Decapentaplegic (Dpp), the homolog of vertebrate BMP2 and BMP4, and its specific antagonist, Short gastrulation (Sog), the homolog of vertebrate Chordin (Chd), form a gradient that is necessary for dorsal-ventral patterning of the embryo (21). In vertebrates, BMPs were initially described by their ability to induce ectopic bone and cartilage formation (64). However, BMP expression studies and loss-of-function mouse models have demonstrated a broad range of activities of the different BMP family members for various cell types. BMP signaling plays an essential role in left-right asymmetry of the embryo, neurogenesis, mesoderm patterning, and organogenesis (4). BMP2 or BMP4 is required for the genesis of hematopoietic cell lineages in Xenopus (37, 66), and BMP4 cooperates with VEGF to specify lymphohematopoietic cell development in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells (44). In addition, recent studies have implicated BMPs in angiogenesis through a VEGF-dependent pathway (17).
Because so little is known about the early events in endothelial cell specification, we have sought to identify their molecular determinants using an inductive approach. We have used differentiating mouse ES cell-derived embryoid bodies grown in attached cultures as a model of blood vessel development; the anatomic and molecular events in embryonic endothelial cell differentiation and blood vessel development are faithfully recapitulated in this model (65, 67). In this report, we describe the cloning and characterization of BMP-binding endothelial cell precursor-derived regulator (BMPER), which binds BMP4 and inhibits BMP-dependent developmental events in several models, including Smad activation, mesoderm specification, and endothelial cell differentiation.
|
|
|---|
ES cell culture. R1 mouse ES cells were grown on gelatinized tissue culture plates with maintenance medium containing conditioned medium from human 5637 bladder carcinoma cells. Differentiation was initiated by harvesting ES cell aggregates with dispase and culturing embryoid bodies in differentiation medium (Dulbecco modified Eagle medium with 10% fetal calf serum and 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol). Cells were initially grown in bacterial dishes to allow for the formation of cystic embryoid bodies and were plated on tissue culture dishes after 60 h for attachment. Attached embryoid bodies were grown under these conditions for various times (5).
For BMP-dependent ES cell differentiation assays, R1 cells were grown under conditions in which embryoid bodies survive but significant endothelial cell differentiation occurs only after stimulation with growth factors (2, 43). After commencement of differentiation, ES cells were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% knockout SR serum replacement (Gibco) in bacterial dishes. After 48 h, cells were placed in six-well tissue culture dishes with fresh medium and transfected with pSecTag2BMPER (see below) or control plasmid by using the Fugene-6 method. Recombinant BMP4 or BMP4 preincubated with neutralizing antibody MAB757 was added to the dishes 24 h after transfection. On day 5 of differentiation, the medium was replaced, and BMP4 or BMP4-MAB757 was added again. On day 7, the embryoid bodies were dissolved to single-cell suspensions by using trypsin and were analyzed by flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry and cell sorting. ES cells were harvested with trypsin, washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and passed through a 40-µm cell strainer. Cells were stained with the appropriate antibody for 30 min, washed twice in PBS-0.1% BSA, and analyzed by using a Becton Dickinson FACScan with Cytomation Summit software. For cell sorting experiments, 107 cells were harvested in a similar manner, stained with PE-conjugated anti-flk-1 antibody, washed, and sorted into the respective positive or negative population by using a MoFlo instrument (Cytomation).
RNA preparation, Northern blotting, and PCR. Total RNA from cells in culture or sorted cell suspensions was prepared by guanidinium isothiocyanate extraction and centrifugation through cesium chloride (53).
The quality of the RNA was analyzed by agarose-formaldehyde gel electrophoresis, and quantification was performed spectrophotometrically. For Northern blotting, total RNA was separated by agarose-formaldehyde gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane by capillary action (53). The membrane was subjected to hybridization in hybridization buffer (Quickhyb; Stratagene) with [32P]dCTP randomly labeled cDNA fragments and was exposed to film. An adult mouse multiorgan blot was purchased from OriGene Technologies. Semiquantitative PCR was performed with the following primers: flk-1forward, 5'-GGACTTCCTGACCTTGGAGC-3', and reverse, 5'-GGGGTAGTGTAGTCAGGAGC-3'; glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G3PDH)forward, 5'-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3', and reverse, 5'-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3'; and BMPERforward, 5'-CCCGGCTGAGCCATGTGTCC-3', and reverse, 5'-CAGCTCCACAGACTTGGTCC-3'.
cDNA library cloning and subtractive PCR. flk-1-positive and flk-1-negative cDNA libraries were cloned by using a modification of Clontech SMART technology. Reverse transcription of total RNA from sorted ES cells was performed with a modified oligo-dT primer containing an internal priming site, and an asymmetrical primer site was attached at the 5' end of the reverse transcription product. The cDNA libraries were amplified by PCR with the internal priming site. An flk-1-enriched cDNA library was created by subtracting the flk-1-negative library from the flk-1-positive library by using subtractive PCR technology (PCR-SELECT; Clontech). The resulting cDNA library was cloned into vector pCR2.1 (Invitrogen), transformed into Escherichia coli, plated on Luria-Bertani-ampicillin agar, and screened for inserts with blue-white color selection. White colonies were grown in 96-well plates and used as a template for insert amplification by PCR. PCR products were spotted to create two identical nylon membranes and were hybridized separately with [32P]dCTP randomly labeled probes derived from the flk-1-positive and flk-1-negative sorted cDNA libraries. Differentially expressed clones were sequenced. The full-length BMPER cDNA fragment was cloned by 3' and 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends with adult mouse lung RNA as a template. For mammalian expression, the coding sequence, without the signal peptide, was cloned into pSecTag2 (Invitrogen) to create pSecTag2BMPER, which contains a carboxy-terminal Myc tag for immunodetection and the mouse kappa-chain immunoglobulin signal sequence at the amino terminus for efficient secretion (35).
Western blotting, protein purification, and coimmunoprecipitation. COS-7 cells were transfected with pSecTag2BMPER by using the Fugene-6 method to obtain Myc-tagged protein. At 24 h after transfection, the medium was changed to OptiMEM-1, and cell supernatants were collected. To obtain cell lysates, cells were washed with PBS and harvested in radioimmunoprecipitation buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EGTA, 1% Igepal, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate). Cell supernatants were concentrated with Amicon Centriplus columns and analyzed by gel electrophoresis. Empty vector transfections were used as controls. For BMP4 coimmunoprecipitation, samples were immunoprecipitated with an anti-Myc-agarose conjugate for 2 h at room temperature in immunoprecipitation (IP) binding buffer {150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM CaCl2, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% deoxycholate, 0.1% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), 5% glycerol, 0.1% BSA}. Samples were washed three times in IP binding buffer, pellets were resuspended in IP binding buffer, and BMP4 (5 nM) and/or competing proteins (125 nM) were added for 2 h of incubation. Samples were washed again three times in IP binding buffer without BSA and an additional three times in radioimmunoprecipitation buffer for the competition experiment and resuspended in 6x loading buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, 30% glycerol, 4% SDS, 0.05%, bromophenol blue, 1 M ß-mercaptoethanol), and Western blotting was performed.
Reporter gene assay. A pGL2-based reporter construct containing an Smad5-binding sequence (3GC2) upstream of the luciferase reporter gene was kindly provided by M. Kato (26). 293T cells grown in six-well plates were transfected with the reporter gene and pSecTag2BMPER or empty vector (control). BMP4 (final concentration, 0.5 nM) was added at 18 h after transfection. At 38 h after transfection, cells were harvested in reporter lysis buffer (Promega), and luciferase activity was analyzed by luminometry with a luciferase assay system (Promega). Each condition was analyzed with at least six independent samples, and each sample was analyzed in triplicate.
In situ hybridization. Embryos were collected at different times from pregnant CD-1 mice. After fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, embryos were stained with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probe or a respective sense control. Digoxigenin was detected with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody (Roche), and the reaction was developed by adding nitroblue tetrazolium chloride-5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate toluidine salt (Promega). For in situ analysis of sections, whole embryos were fixed as described above, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 10 µm, and placed on frosted slides before staining was performed (7).
Xenopus laevis embryos and microinjections. X. laevis embryos were obtained by in vitro fertilization (59) and dejellied by cysteine treatment (0.1x MBS [8.8 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM KCl, 0.07 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM MgSO4, 0.5 mM HEPES, 0.25 mM NaHCO3, pH 7.5] -2% L-cysteine hydrochloride [pH 8.1] for 2 min; then 10 rinses with 0.1x MBS) about 1 h after cortical rotation. Embryos for microinjection were transferred to 1x MBS containing 4% Ficoll type 400 (Sigma) (10). Full-length capped sense mRNA of BMPER and X. laevis BMP4 (pSP64) were synthesized by using T7 and SP6 RNA polymerases, respectively (mMESSAGE mMACHINE; Ambion). For misexpression studies, 420 or 840 pg of the BMPER transcript and 50 pg of the BMP4 transcript were injected into the marginal zone of either two ventral or two dorsal cells at the four-cell stage close to the first cleavage furrow, either alone or in combination, by using a nitrogen pressure-driven system (Narishige IM-300). The embryos were transferred to 0.1x MBS 2 h after injection, allowed to develop to the desired stages, and scored for secondary axis formation or the development of dorsoanterior structures (dorsoanterior index [33]) at stage 14 or 32. The embryos were staged as described by Nieuwkoop and Faber (45). The results (see Fig. 8A) are combined totals from two independent experiments.
![]() View larger version (57K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Effects of BMPER on dorsal-ventral axis development in X. laevis. (A) Summary of the effects of BMPER injection into Xenopus blastomeres at the four-cell stage. n, number of embryos. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (B to D) Axis formation in Xenopus embryos at stage 14. Bar, 750 µm. (B) Control. (C) Dorsally injected. (D) Ventrally injected. Single asterisk, primary axis; double asterisk, secondary axis. (E and F) Representative embryos at stage 32. Bar, 1 mm. (E) Control. (F) Ventrally injected. (G) Mesoderm marker gene expression in activin A-treated animal caps, as analyzed by RT-PCR at stage 10. +, injected; -, not injected; H4, histone H4.
|
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The BMPER full-length cDNA sequence has been deposited in GenBank under accession number AY263358.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Screening for differentially expressed cDNAs in endothelial cell precursors. (A) Outline of the screening strategy. (B) Time course of flk-1 expression in embryoid body cultures. Hours are given to indicate the time after the initiation of differentiation. Single-cell solutions of embryoid bodies were stained with PE-conjugated anti-flk-1 antibody. Subsequent studies were performed to coincide with the initial wave of flk-1 cell surface expression. (C) Separation of flk-1-positive endothelial cell precursors from flk-1-negative cells by sorting of a mixed single-cell solution of embryoid body cultures at 98 h. Reanalysis demonstrated near homogeneity of the postsorting populations. (D) PCR (25 cycles) for flk-1 with cloned cDNA libraries from flk-1-positive or -negative cells as a template. Highly efficient enrichment of flk-1 was seen. G3PDH was amplified as a control. (E) PCR for flk-1 with the flk-1-positive cDNA library before (upper panel) or after (lower panel) subtraction of the flk-1-negative library as a template. After subtraction, flk-1 was enriched approximately 32-fold (25).
|
![]() View larger version (72K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Cloning and analysis of the BMPER cDNA and gene. (A) Nucleotide (upper row) and deduced amino acid (lower row) sequences. The open reading frame contains 2,055 bases coding for 685 amino acids. The predicted molecular mass is 76.1 kDa. The hydrophobic signal sequence, CR domains 1 to 5, a partial von Willebrand D (vWD) domain, and a trypsin inhibitor (TI) domain are underlined. (B) Exon-intron organization of the gene locus on mouse chromosome 9A4. (C) Structures of Crossveinless-2, Chordin, and Kielin in comparison to that of BMPER. TSP, thrombospondin domain.
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. BMPER mRNA expression in differentiating embryoid bodies and adult tissue. (A) Expression of BMPER in flk-1-positive and flk-1-negative cells sorted from differentiating embryoid bodies, as determined by semiquantitative PCR. (B) Northern analysis with cDNAs for BMPER, flk-1, and 18S rRNA (as an indicator of RNA loading) to probe total RNA obtained from embryoid body (EB) cultures on the indicated days of differentiation or from undifferentiated ES cells (ES). After hybridization with BMPER, a single band of 3.5 kb was visible. (C) Northern analysis with a BMPER cDNA probe of polyadenylated RNA from the indicated adult mouse tissues. Filters were probed with ß-actin to visualize RNA loading. BMPER mRNA expression was highest in the heart, lungs, skin, and brain.
|
![]() View larger version (96K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Localization of BMPER mRNA in developing mouse embryos. (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization of a mouse day 9.5 embryo with a digoxigenin-labeled BMPER antisense cDNA probe. Note the midline staining in the rostral telencephalon (arrow). Bar, 500 µm. (B) Transverse section from the same embryo at the level indicated in the diagram at the lower left. Bar, 80 µm. tv, telencephalic vesicle. (C) Magnification of the frontal area from panel B. Bar, 20 µm. (D) Transverse section of the embryo shown in panel A at the level indicated in the diagram. Bar, 80 µm. nt, neural tube; rp, Rathke's pouch; s, somite; nc, notochord. Cells that appear to be migrating ventrally toward the branchial arch and heart region express BMPER. (E to H) In situ hybridization of sections from a day 10.5 mouse embryo. Arrows indicate the AGM region. (E and F) Overview of BMPER staining (E) versus that of the sense control (F) at the level indicated in the diagram. Bar, 400 µm. (G) Magnification of panel E. Bar, 150 µm. da, dorsal aorta. Note the staining of cells ventrolateral to the dorsal aorta and a ring-shaped layer of stained cells around the dorsal aorta (arrowheads). (H) Magnification of panel F. Bar, 50 µm. pg, primitive gut.
|
BMPER RNA was also detected in yolk sacs. At day 9.5, BMPER transcripts were expressed in a reticular staining pattern consistent with staining of the developing yolk sac vasculature (Fig. 5A) (48, 63). In yolk sac sections at day 10.5, BMPER was detected in endothelial cells lining the inner layer of the vascular wall (Fig. 5B). BMPER RNA was also detected in cell lines derived from yolk sac (C166) and intraembryonic (MEC) endothelial cells (Fig. 5C). Taken together, these analyses indicate that BMPER is expressed in primitive members of the endothelial cell lineage in both the embryonic and the extraembryonic compartments.
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. BMPER expression in extraembryonic tissues and endothelial cell lines. (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization of a yolk sac at day 9.5. Bar, 200 µm. (B) In situ hybridization of a sectioned yolk sac at day 10.5. Arrowheads indicate BMPER-positive cells. Bar, 70 µm. (C) Northern analysis of total RNA from cultured mouse intraembryonic endothelial cells (MEC) and cultured mouse yolk sac-derived embryonic endothelial cells (C166) with a BMPER cDNA probe.
|
Expression of BMPER in cultured mammalian cells (as a carboxy-terminal Myc-tagged protein) resulted in the detection of a protein with the appropriate molecular mass in cell lysates (Fig. 6A). The full-length protein was also detected in cell supernatants, as was a smaller protein, of about 42 kDa, which likely represents a carboxy-terminal proteolytic fragment, as has been described for other BMP-associated secreted proteins, such as Chordin (36) and Chordin-like protein (43). The presence of this fragment only in the secreted fraction suggests that cleavage is dependent on an extracellular protease. Based on the sequence similarity between BMPER and other BMP-binding proteins, we tested the association of BMPER with BMP4 and found that recombinant BMP4 could indeed be efficiently and specifically immunoprecipitated by Myc-tagged BMPER that was immunopurified after expression in COS-7 cells (Fig. 6B). We used competition assays to determine whether the related BMPs BMP2 and BMP6, which overlap in expression with BMPER along the dorsal midline (34), could also bind BMPER (1); both of these proteins in a 25-fold excess efficiently competed for binding between BMPER and BMP4 (Fig. 6C), indicating that BMPER may also bind these proteins. Bovine fibroblast growth factor in similar concentrations did not compete for BMPER binding, demonstrating the specificity of this assay.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Mammalian expression of BMPER and BMP binding. (A) COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with vector pSecTag2BMPER, which is tagged with a Myc epitope at the carboxyl terminus, or empty vector. Supernatant medium and whole-cell lysates were obtained and subjected to Western blot analysis with an anti-Myc antibody. The arrow indicates full-length BMPER. (B) Myc-tagged BMPER purified from cell supernatants was incubated with recombinant BMP4, as indicated, and reaction mixtures were immunoprecipitated (IP) with an anti-Myc antibody, followed by Western blotting for BMP4 (lower panel). BMP4 was immunoprecipitated only in the presence of BMPER. In the third lane, BMP4 (10 ng) was loaded directly as a control. The efficient immunoprecipitation of BMPER was confirmed by blotting for Myc (upper panel). n.s., nonspecific. (C) Competition with BMP4 binding was used to determine the promiscuity of BMPER interactions with BMPs. Competition for coimmunoprecipitation of BMP4 with BMPER was tested in the presence of a 25-fold molar excess of BMP2, BMP6, or bovine fibroblast growth factor (bFGF).
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Effects of BMPER expression on BMP4 activity in mammalian cells. 293T cells were transiently transfected with an Smad5-dependent luciferase reporter plasmid and pSecTag2BMPER or control plasmid, as indicated. A plasmid expressing ß-galactosidase was cotransfected to control for transfection efficiency. Recombinant BMP4 or a control, as indicated, was added after 18 h and incubated for an additional 20 h. Luciferase activity was normalized for transfection efficiency and expressed as a percentage of the activity in untreated cells (mean and standard deviation).
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Coinjection of BMPER and BMP4. (A) Effects of coinjection of BMPER and BMP4 (50 pg) into both ventral blastomeres at the four-cell stage versus injection of BMPER alone. Embryos were scored for secondary axis formation at stage 14. Symbols: , single axis; , secondary axis. (B) Effects of coinjection of BMPER (840 pg) and BMP4 (50 pg) into both dorsal blastomeres versus injection of BMP4 alone. Embryos were scored for dorsoanterior structures at stage 32. DAI, dorsoanterior index. Symbols: , BMP4, 25 embryos; , BMP4 plus BMPER, 21 embryos.
|
To examine BMPER function further in a model of mouse embryonic development, ES cells were grown under conditions that allow for cell survival but not for significant differentiation without the addition of growth factors (2, 43). Under these conditions, the stimulation of differentiating ES cells with BMP4 results in the development of an endothelial cell subpopulation after 7 days of differentiation, as determined by staining for the definitive endothelial cell marker VE-cadherin (Fig. 10). Neutralization of BMP4 by a blocking antibody inhibited the differentiation of this endothelial cell subpopulation. Comparable BMP4 inhibition was also observed in differentiating ES cells that were transfected with BMPER and subsequently stimulated with BMP4, although BMPER transfection alone had no effect on endothelial cell differentiation in the absence of stimulation. The quantitative analysis of three independent experiments indicated a significant reduction of VE-cadherin-positive cells in the MAB757- and BMP4-treated embryoid bodies as well as in the BMPER-transfected and BMP4-treated embryoid bodies compared to those treated with BMP4 alone (Fig. 10F). These results further confirm the BMP-inhibiting activity of BMPER and indicate that this activity may serve to modulate the differentiation of endothelial cells and their precursors in response to developmental cues, as suggested by the developmental expression and cellular function of this secreted protein.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Effects of BMPER on BMP-dependent differentiation of ES cells into endothelial cells. Embryoid bodies were incubated for 7 days under serum-free conditions. Definitive endothelial cells were detected by flow cytometry with an anti-VE-cadherin rat immunoglobulin G2 antibody and the respective fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibody. (A and B) VE-cadherin-positive cells were rare in the absence of BMP4 (A), and BMPER expression had a minimal effect under these conditions (B). (C and D) Expansion of the endothelial cell population increased in the presence of recombinant BMP4 (1 nM) (C), but this effect was attenuated when recombinant BMP4 was preincubated for 30 min at 37°C with a blocking antibody (MAB757) at a final concentration of 2 µg/ml (D). (E) Similarly, the expression of BMPER inhibited endothelial cell differentiation induced by BMP4. Results for panels A to E are representative of three independent experiments. (F) BMP4-dependent endothelial cell differentiation in embryoid bodies, as determined on the basis of VE-cadherin-positive cells in treated cells. Error bars indicate standard errors of the mean. An asterisk indicates a P value of <0.05 for a comparison with BMP4-treated cells.
|
|
|
|---|
BMPs are a group of more than 30 proteins of the TGF-ß superfamily of extracellular regulators. BMPs activate heterodimeric serine/threonine kinase receptors, which in turn phosphorylate their intracellular substrates, the transcription factors Smad1 and Smad5, to activate BMP-dependent gene regulatory events (38). Molecules within the BMP signaling pathway are critical for a number of developmental events, including left-right asymmetry, mesoderm patterning, and the development of several organs, such as the nervous system and the heart (4). The classical BMP in Drosophila, Decapentaplegic, and its vertebrate homologs, BMP2 and BMP4, regulate the patterning of the embryonic dorsal-ventral axis (21). The activities of BMP family members are further regulated by extracellular binding partners. Chordin and its Drosophila homolog, Sog, are prototypical members of one family of binding partners. Full-length Chordin binds to BMP2 and BMP4 and inhibits their binding to BMP receptors, thus antagonizing BMP activity (50). In Xenopus, Chordin is permissive for the development of dorsally derived tissues, including somitic muscle and neuroectoderm. Chordin may be cleaved and its BMP-binding activity may be decreased (but not abolished) by the metalloprotease Tolloid. The functional interaction of Chordin and BMPs is further regulated by Twisted gastrulation, which stabilizes the association of full-length (but not cleaved) Chordin with BMP (36). Twisted gastrulation may therefore serve as an agonist or as an antagonist of BMP activity, depending on local gradients of Chordin and Tolloid.
Chordin contains four conserved 70-amino-acid CR repeats that comprise its BMP-binding activity. It is now recognized that the presence of CR repeats defines a group of proteins that bind to and, in general, antagonize BMPs, among these being Procollagen IIA, Neuralin, and Kielin (13, 39, 73). On the basis of the five CR repeats present in BMPER, we considered the possibility that it is also a BMP-binding protein. Indeed, we found that BMPER efficiently bound BMP4 (Fig. 6B and C) and that BMPER could repress BMP-dependent Smad5 transcriptional activation (Fig. 7). Additionally, BMPER could rescue BMP4-ventralized Xenopus embryos (Fig. 9B). In Xenopus animal caps, injection of BMPER mRNA completely abolished the transcription of Xvent-1 (Fig. 8G), which is a downstream transcriptional target of BMP4 signaling via Smad5 activation (23). Interestingly BMP4 activity itself was somewhat downregulated in this assay (although not to the extent of Xvent-1), consistent with reports of BMP4 autoregulation (2, 6). In addition, BMPER resulted in axis duplication activity when injected into early Xenopus embryos ventrally but had no effect when injected into dorsal blastomeres. These findings are in congruence with the consequences of injection of Chordin into the same locations (55).
Coinjections of BMPER and BMP4 into ventral blastomeres rescued the dorsalizing activity of BMPER, and coinjections into dorsal bastomeres rescued the ventralizing effect of BMP4, supporting the hypothesis that BMPER acts by antagonizing BMP4 (Fig. 9). Finally, using an established ES cell assay (43), we show that BMPER inhibits BMP4-dependent endothelial cell differentiation (Fig. 10E). It has been reported, with a similar model of differentiating ES cells, that the expression of a dominant-negative BMP receptor blocks differentiation into flk-1-positive lineages (2). The effects of BMPER in our studies are similar, providing further support for the notion that BMP signaling events are important in endothelial cell differentiation, with BMPER acting as an endothelial cell precursor-derived inhibitor of this process. We have demonstrated, using multiple methods, that BMPER is a new member of the group of CR repeat-containing BMP-binding partners. Under the conditions observed here, it acts as a BMP antagonist.
Structure of BMPER. In addition to five CR repeats, BMPER also contains a von Willebrand D domain (Fig. 2C), which in some situations functions as a multimerization module (3, 30, 31). Two additional CR repeat-containing proteins also have von Willebrand D domains. Kielin (a Xenopus BMP repressor) has 27 CR repeats and a carboxy-terminal von Willebrand D domain; Kielin has BMP-antagonizing activity, although its ability to interact with BMPs has not been formally demonstrated (39). Crossveinless-2 is a Drosophila protein that contains five CR domains and a carboxy-terminal von Willebrand D domain but no trypsin inhibitor domain. The gene encoding this protein was positionally cloned based on its requisite role in wing cross vein development (14). Although the biochemical function of Crossveinless-2 (in particular, whether it directly interacts with BMPs) has not been reported, it does interact with BMP activity genetically in Drosophila. In particular, Crossveinless-2 potentiates Decapentaplegic signaling in the wing. This finding suggests that, unlike other reported CR repeat-containing proteins that modulate BMP activity, Crossveinless-2 is an agonist rather than an antagonist of BMP function.
The size and domain structure of BMPER and Crossveinless-2 are similar, and they share 30% identity and 44% similarity at the amino acid level. It is possible that BMPER and Crossveinless-2 are orthologs, although the biochemical effects of BMPER presented in this report and the genetic functions of Crossveinless-2 with respect to BMP activity are incongruent. The possibility that these two proteins are structurally similar yet have divergent functions cannot be excluded. It is possible that the presence of the trypsin inhibitor domain in BMPER confers functions different from those of Crossveinless-2. More complex models can also be developed, based on the assumption that these proteins are indeed structural and functional homologs. The precedent of Twisted gastrulation, which has both pro- and anti-BMP activities depending on the concentrations and activities of Chordin and Tolloid (36), raises the possibility that antipodal functions may be a more general property of BMP-binding proteins.
In this context, it is interesting that a second Crossveinless phenotype exists in Drosophila; this phenotype is due to mutation of twisted gastrulation-2, a second twisted gastrulation gene that arose spontaneously in Drosophila (52). The similar phenotypes suggest that Twisted gastrulation-2 and Crossveinless-2 together activate Decapentaplegic signaling in Drosophila. Whether the mammalian homolog of Twisted gastrulation has a similar effect on BMPER remains to be determined (in contrast to Drosophila, mammals contain only one twisted gastrulation gene), but is an interesting possibility that would reconcile these two studies. Such a model is not entirely speculative. In our studies, we noted that BMPER undergoes proteolytic cleavage in the extracellular space (Fig. 6A) to yield a carboxy-terminal fragment of approximately 42 kDa. (An amino-terminal fragment may also be present but would not be detectable in our assays because our protein was tagged at the carboxyl terminus.) Because the effects of Twisted gastrulation as an agonist or antagonist of BMPs depends in large part on Tolloid-dependent cleavage of Chordin, it is tempting to speculate that cleavage of BMPER by a protease may ultimately alter its function toward BMP4, perhaps through interactions with Twisted gastrulation or a similar protein. Although this model is attractive, we have not yet found evidence for such a dual function, and in our diverse assays, BMPER consistently behaves as a BMP antagonist.
BMPER and angioblast differentiation. The design of our initial screen, to determine genes that are preferentially coexpressed with the flk-1 gene in differentiating ES cells, raises the interesting possibility that BMPER has a role in angioblast differentiation and/or vasculogenesis. With the exception of ALK1 (49) and endoglin (24, 29, 62), which are coreceptors for TGF-ß and BMP family members, a role for BMP family members in vascular formation has not been extensively studied. However, it is interesting that the deletion of several proteins involved in different steps of BMP signaling causes vascular phenotypes in mice. For example, bmp4 mutants have compromised blood and endothelial cell development resulting from defective blood island formation (68). Not surprisingly, the phenotype that results from the deletion of BMP receptor type I is very similar to the bmp4-/- phenotype (42). Most mouse embryos lacking bmp2 have, in addition to impaired mesoderm formation, defective heart development in the embryos that survived gastrulation (72). Targeted mutation of smad5, which encodes a transcription factor downstream of BMP2 or BMP4, results in the disorganization of yolk sac vasculature and heart development perturbation similar to that seen in bmp2 mutants (9). The general conclusion of these studies is that the BMP signaling pathway has a requisite role in vascular development. However, to our knowledge, the specific expression of BMP-related proteins in the vascular compartment has not yet been described, and so it is as yet unclear how BMPs mediate specific effects on vascular progenitors.
BMPER is expressed with marked specificity in flk-1-positive ES cells (Fig. 3A), which are generally considered to represent the earliest stage of the endothelial cell lineage in this model and in mouse embryos, and the temporal expression of BMPER closely mimics that of flk-1 (Fig. 3B). In mouse embryos, BMPER is expressed in the AGM region, which is enriched in cells of the vascular lineage, as well as in endothelial cells that have been incorporated into the aorta. As an inhibitor of BMP signaling (Fig. 7 to 9), BMPER would be expected to antagonize endothelial cell differentiation, and indeed this is the effect that we observed in differentiating ES cells, which recapitulate most of the early developmental events in vascular morphology (65, 67). Although the precise role of BMPER in endothelial cell differentiation requires further elucidation, our data indicate a model in which flk-1-positive cells express BMPER in order to modulate local BMP signaling. The expression of BMPER may inhibit the recruitment of additional flk-1-positive cells to prevent vascular overgrowth, or BMPER may be secreted to encourage the differentiation of other cell lineages that can arise from the same (or spatially adjacent) precursor cells. This model would predict that multipotential precursors may be primed to assume a vascular lineage in response to stimulation by BMPs and that the vascular expression of BMPER (and perhaps other proteins that modify BMP responses) determines which cells respond to local BMPs and which do not.
|
|
|---|
M.M. is a postdoctoral fellow supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. F.L.C. is supported by the American Heart Association. C.P. is an established investigator of the American Heart Association and a Burroughs Wellcome Fund clinician scientist in translational research. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL 61656, HL 03658, and HL 072347 to C.P.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»