Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, September 2003, p. 6129-6138, Vol. 23, No. 17
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.17.6129-6138.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Received 19 March 2003/ Returned for modification 15 April 2003/ Accepted 6 June 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The heat shock response of Drosophila melanogaster is an ideal system for studying the processes of transcription activation and repression (6, 35). During heat shock, the transcription and translation of gene products cease, accompanied by the extremely rapid induction of the heat shock genes (27, 30, 41). The change in the transcriptional profile of Drosophila cells during heat shock is also reflected in the distribution of Ser10-phosphorylated histone H3 within the genome, visualized by the staining of salivary gland polytene chromosomes via standard immunochemical methods. After heat shock, H3 phosphorylation appears at sites containing the heat shock genes, whereas H3 becomes dephosphorylated at previously active genes concomitantly with their transcriptional repression. However, it is not known at this time whether histone phosphorylation occurs during the process of transcription initiation or elongation. This change in the distribution of phosphorylated H3 during heat shock is a dynamic process that requires the activity of a functional heat shock transcription factor (HSF) (32), further illustrating an intimate association of Ser10-phosphorylated H3 with active transcription (9, 10, 32, 43). The link between phosphorylated histone H3 and transcription suggests that this process may be regulated by the levels of H3 phosphorylation, which may in turn be determined by the activity of specific protein kinases and/or phosphatases.
Serine/threonine protein phosphatase type 2A (PP2A) is a heterotrimer consisting of catalytic, structural, and regulatory subunits. Although the catalytic and structural subunits are highly conserved and essential for proper enzymatic activity among all human and yeast isoforms of PP2A (18), the regulatory subunit is by contrast highly variable, imparting cellular compartment targeting information and substrate specificity for PP2A catalytic activity (20, 26). Inhibitory factors are known to attenuate PP2A catalytic activity by competing with the regulatory subunit for association with the PP2A trimer. This replacement of the regulatory subunit with other proteins can result in the partial or total loss of PP2A catalytic activity (15, 16, 44). This loss or misregulation of PP2A activity results in a variety of defects, such as increased cellular transformation (44) and abnormal chromosomal segregation (25). While PP2A has numerous roles in various cellular processes, such as cell cycle control (25, 39), and the integration of cellular signaling pathways, such as the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (28, 40, 45), a clear link between PP2A activity and the regulation of transcription has yet to be established.
Here we report that PP2A has a role in the process of transcription activation and inactivation. The PP2A enzyme is capable of dephosphorylating the Ser10-phosphorylated histone H3 isoform. Treatment of Drosophila salivary glands with strong phosphatase inhibitors and analysis of polytene chromosomes isolated from PP2A mutants demonstrate that loss of PP2A activity results in disruption of the characteristic redistribution of phosphorylated histone H3 during heat shock, with an increase of the phosphorylated H3 isoform at sites that do not contain heat shock genes. Further, these non-heat-shock gene-containing loci are actively transcribed and contain activated RNA polymerase II complexes. We also find that the SET protein, a strong cellular inhibitor of PP2A, is present at regions of active transcription within polytene chromosomes and can prevent dephosphorylation of Ser10-phosphorylated H3 by PP2A catalysis. These results suggest that regulation of PP2A activity via the SET protein might modulate changes in gene expression in Drosophila.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drug treatment of salivary glands and bromouridine triphosphate (BrUTP) labeling. Salivary glands were isolated from wandering third-instar Oregon R and twsP mutant larvae in complete Grace's medium (Sigma). For treatment, isolated glands were placed in glass culture tubes containing indicated concentrations of okadaic acid (Sigma) diluted in Grace's medium and heat shocked in a water bath at 37°C for 20 min. Following heat shock, the salivary glands were immediately fixed and squashed as above.
For in vivo labeling of nascent transcripts, we followed the method of Westwood and colleagues (8), with the following exceptions: salivary glands were incubated in culture tubes containing 10 mM BrUTP (Sigma) in complete Grace's medium with 400 µM DOTAP (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)/ml for 20 min at 37°C prior to squashing as above.
Immunocytochemistry. Slides were incubated overnight in antibody dilution buffer (1x phosphate-buffered saline, 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.05% Triton X-100) containing primary antibodies at concentrations of 1:100 anti-Ser10-phosphohistone H3 (kindly provided by David Allis and also purchased from Upstate Biotechnologies), 1:15 anti-SET, and antibromodeoxyuridine (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) or 1:1 anti-hyperphosphorylated RNA polymerase II (H5) (a gift from Joseph Gall). Following incubation, slides were washed three times in antibody dilution buffer and incubated with a 1:250 dilution of either fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G or Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories) for 1 h at 37°C. DNA probes were detected with a 1:100 dilution of FITC-conjugated antidigoxigenin (Roche). Slides were washed three times in antibody dilution buffer, rinsed briefly in phosphate-buffered saline, stained with 0.5 µg of 4',6-diaminidine-2-phenylindole (DAPI)/ml, and mounted in Vectashield antifade mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) for viewing.
Preparation of Drosophila protein extracts. Fifty wandering third-instar larvae were homogenized in cold sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 2% SDS, 0.001% bromophenol blue, 0.2 M DTT, 2% glycerol) using five strokes of a Dounce homogenizer. For heat-shocked larval extracts, 50 wandering third-instar larvae were heat shocked as described above and then immediately homogenized. Following homogenization, protein samples were immediately run on SDS-15% polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes for immunodetection. Following transfer to PVDF, the presence of Ser10-phosphorylated histone H3 in larval samples was detected by following standard immunoblot techniques, using anti-Ser10-phosphohistone H3 (kindly provided by David Allis, and also purchased from Upstate Biotechnologies).
Preparation of DNA probes and in situ hybridization. Digoxigenin-labeled DNA probes were prepared using the Prime-A-Gene random priming kit (Promega). The template used for random priming was a fragment corresponding to nucleotides +219 to +575 of the Drosophila hsp70 transcription unit amplified via PCR. Labeled probes were ethanol precipitated and stored in hybridization buffer (4x SSC [1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate], 50% formamide, 1x Denhardt's containing 0.4 mg of salmon sperm DNA/ml) until ready for use.
Polytene chromosomes were prepared and frozen in liquid N2 as described above. Coverslips were removed, and the slides were stored in ethanol at -70°C until ready for use. Slides were allowed to warm to room temperature, air-dried, and incubated in 2x SSC for 60 min at 65°C. The slides were then dehydrated through an ethanol series, air-dried, and denatured for 3 min in 0.07 M NaOH. Following denaturation, the slides were dehydrated again through an ethanol series and allowed to air dry at room temperature prior to hybridization.
For hybridization, boiled probes were added to the dried, denatured polytene squashes and covered immediately with a coverslip. The slide and coverslip were sealed with rubber cement and incubated at 37°C overnight in a humidified chamber. Following hybridization, coverslips were removed and the slides were washed under high-stringency conditions before proceeding directly to immunocytochemical treatment, as described above.
Preparation of SET antibody and in vitro SET protein expression. A Drosophila full-length SET cDNA was cloned in-frame into the pET15b vector (InVitrogen), expressed as a poly-His fusion protein, and purified using standard nickel-binding chromatography. Antibody production was carried out as previously described (12). For SET protein expression, a pET 15b vector (InVitrogen) containing the full-length SET cDNA was used as a template in the TnT coupled reticulocyte lysate expression system (Promega). SET protein was detected in the reticulocyte lysate using standard immunodetection protocols and anti-SET antibody.
In vitro PP2A assay. PP2A activity was measured as follows. Briefly, 5 µg of core histones prepared from Colcemid-treated HeLa cells (Upstate Biotechnology) was used as a substrate in assay buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.0], 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM MnCl2, 10 µg of BSA/ml, 50 µM leupeptin) containing 0.1 U of purified PP2A AC dimer (Upstate Biotechnology). Where indicated, either in vitro-translated SET protein (1 µl of the completed rabbit reticulocyte translation reaction, see above) or 50 nM okadaic acid (Sigma) were included in the assay buffer. Assay reactions were incubated for 60 min at 37°C and stopped by the 1:1 addition of 2x protein sample buffer (0.125 M Tris-Cl, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 2% ß-mercaptoethanol [pH 6.8]) and boiling at 100°C for 5 min. Assay samples were immediately run on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to PVDF membranes for immunodetection analysis. Following transfer to PVDF, the presence of Ser10-phosphorylated histone H3 in assay samples was detected by following standard immunoblot techniques, using anti-Ser10-phosphohistone H3.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
In addition, polytene chromosomes isolated from these mutants should resemble polytene chromosomes isolated from okadaic acid-treated salivary glands in that they should display Ser10-phosphorylated histone H3 at both heat shock and non-heat-shock gene loci during thermal stress. We find that this is indeed the case. Prior to heat shock, the distributions of phosphorylated H3 isoforms in polytene chromosomes prepared from wild-type and twsP mutant larvae are virtually indistinguishable (Fig. 3A and C). After a 20-min heat shock, polytene chromosomes prepared from heat-shocked wild-type larvae show phosphorylated H3 primarily at the heat shock loci. By contrast, chromosomes from twsP mutant larvae show a greater number of sites containing Ser10-phosphorylated H3 at non-heat-shock loci than wild-type controls (Fig. 3B and D). The presence of the Ser10-phosphorylated histone H3 isoform at numerous non-heat-shock gene-containing loci in twsP mutant larvae after heat shock supports our hypothesis that PP2A may have a role in the regulation of transcription during heat shock by controlling histone H3 dephosphorylation.
|
|
|
|
To determine if SET was present at a particular heat shock gene under non-heat-shock conditions, we used immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization with a portion of the hsp70 transcription unit as a probe to examine the distribution of SET protein on polytene chromosomes relative to the position of the hsp70 genes prior to heat shock. We found that before temperature elevation, the SET protein is absent or present at very low levels in the chromosome regions containing hsp70 genes (Fig. 6D). Following heat shock, SET staining increases dramatically at the heat shock gene loci, which also contain Ser10-phosphorylated H3 (Fig. 6E). This suggests that SET might be recruited to an actively transcribed gene during activation of transcription. Nevertheless, the SET protein is still present after heat shock at many loci that do not contain phosphorylated H3, suggesting that additional mechanisms must be in place to rapidly inhibit SET activity without requiring its disappearance from genes that are transcriptionally inactivated after temperature elevation.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data suggest a role for PP2A in the process of transcriptional control, possibly through the dephosphorylation of the Ser10-phosphorylated H3 isoform. This conclusion rests on the following experimental observations. Incubation of salivary glands with 50 nM okadaic acid results in the maintenance of Ser10-phosphorylated H3 at sites of non-heat-shock genes in polytene chromosomes after heat shock. Although okadaic acid can inhibit both PP2A and PP1, it is known that its effect is specific for PP2A at this concentration when tested with in vitro assays. PP2A is capable of dephosphorylating Ser10-phosphorylated histone H3 in an in vitro assay. In addition, hypomorphic mutations in a regulatory subunit of PP2A also result in the perdurance of phosphorylated H3 at non-heat-shock genes after thermal stress. The significance of this result is highlighted by the fact that the twsP allele used in these studies only decreases PP2A activity to 50% of normal levels. Finally, SET, an endogenous inhibitor of PP2A catalytic activity, prevents PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of the Ser10-phosphorylated H3 isoform in an in vitro assay and is detected at chromosomal loci containing actively transcribing genes upon their induction. Taken together, these observations support the conclusion that inhibition or attenuation of the catalytic activity of PP2A results in a lack of dephosphorylation of H3 associated with non-heat-shock genes, ultimately preventing the transcriptional repression of these genes.
The inference of a causal relationship between histone H3 phosphorylation and transcriptional activation is based on cytological observations of polytene chromosome staining using specific antibodies. The resolution of these measurements does not allow firm conclusions on whether H3 phosphorylation is associated with specific gene regions. Nevertheless, the perfect overlap in the patterns of the signals elicited by antibodies against the phosphorylated tail of histone H3 and activated RNA polymerase II suggests that indeed phosphorylated histone H3 is associated with active genes. Additional experiments involving chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis would be required to accurately map the specific gene regions associated with this modification and determine whether H3 phosphorylation is involved in the release of the paused RNA polymerase holoenzyme, transcriptional elongation, or other aspects of transcription. The nature of the protein kinase responsible for phosphorylation of histone H3 in actively transcribed genes is not known; but, in principle, this kinase could be pTEF-b. pTEF-b kinase activity is essential for the C-terminal phosphorylation, and subsequent activation, of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme during transcription (23). We find that the phosphorylation of histone H3 is unaffected at the heat shock gene loci in polytene chromosomes prepared from salivary glands treated with the pTEF-b kinase inhibitor DRB (data not shown), suggesting that serine-10 phosphorylation of histone H3 would occur independently of RNA polymerase II phosphorylation and by a mechanism involving a different protein kinase. Since a link between PP2A activity and mitotic Ser10 H3 phosphorylation is suggested by the phenotype of mts mutants (39), PP2A activity may therefore be focused on Ser10-phosphorylated histone H3 rather than the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II during repression of transcription.
Since the processes of transcription activation and repression are highly regulated, control of PP2A activity in the nucleus must be an important step in this process. We find that the SET protein, a highly selective and potent cellular inhibitor of PP2A (21, 29), inhibits PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of Ser10-phosphorylated H3 and colocalizes with regions of active transcription. In the context of the hsp70 gene, prior to gene induction, SET is not detected or is present at very low levels at the 87A and 87C chromosomal subdivisions where the hsp70 genes are located. Following activation of transcription, the amount of SET protein present at these two sites, as well as at other heat shock gene loci, increases dramatically, and this increase might result in inhibition of PP2A activity and subsequent increase in H3 phosphorylation. Attenuation of PP2A activity in vivo involves the replacement of the regulatory subunit of the PP2A heterotrimer with another competing protein, resulting in unregulated or nonspecific PP2A activity (18). This strategy of PP2A inhibition has been observed in several cases, including the action of the simian virus 40 small tumor antigen (44). It remains a strong possibility that the inhibition of PP2A catalytic activity by the SET protein at actively transcribing loci might occur via this method of competition with the regulatory subunit for association with the PP2A heterotrimer.
The detection of SET at some chromosomal loci that do not contain Ser10-phosphoryated H3 during heat shock suggests that the SET protein may itself be regulated as a consequence of the Drosophila heat shock response. This regulation might be accomplished by the presence of additional proteins or by covalent modification of the SET protein. Covalent posttranslational modification of the SET protein may be important for the PP2A inhibitory activity of the SET protein, since we find that recombinant SET protein expressed and purified from bacterial cells is not capable of inhibiting PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of Ser10-phosphorylated histone H3 (data not shown), but SET protein produced in a eukaryotic translation system is perfectly capable of inhibiting PP2A activity (Fig. 6A). A possible modification of the SET protein that could subsequently regulate its activity could be phosphorylation. SET does possess a consensus site for protein kinase C (1) and is known to exist as a phosphoprotein (33), suggesting a regulatory mechanism whereby the inhibition of PP2A by SET might be modulated through the phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of SET. In keeping with the observed kinetics of the heat shock response (27, 30, 41), dephosphorylation of the phospho-SET protein could serve as an extremely rapid means of inactivating SET at non-heat-shock genes. It is interesting that SET-mediated inhibition of PP2A can depend upon other cofactors, such as the SEB and HRX proteins, which regulate SET-PP2A interactions and subsequent PP2A inhibition during leukemogenesis (2, 29). Determining the precise effect of the heat shock response on the SET protein would therefore shed light on the role of SET during transcription.
The precise role of Ser10-phosphorylation of histone H3 tails in transcription is not known. One possibility is that this modification alters chromatin structure in a manner required for the assembly of the transcription complex, or it might serve as a signal for the recruitment of specific proteins at the promoter or for further covalent modifications of histone H3. An interesting alternative is suggested by recent results of Ahmad and Henikoff (9), who have found that transcriptional activation of rDNA arrays in Drosophila correlates with the replacement of histone H3 for the H3.3 variant. Since the antibodies used in our studies do not distinguish between H3 and H3.3, it is possible that the de novo phosphorylation we observe at sites of active transcription takes place on H3.3 molecules as they are incorporated into chromatin. Alternatively, phosphorylation of H3 might be a prerequisite for subsequent exchange with H3.3. This explanation would account for the lack of observations implicating H3 phosphorylation as a general mechanism for transcriptional activation of yeast genes. Since the only form of histone H3 found in yeast corresponds to the H3.3 variant (3, 4), an exchange between H3 and H3.3, and therefore H3 phosphorylation, might not be required for activation of transcription in this organism.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Award GM35463 from the National Institutes of Health.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address: Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York, NY 10016. | REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Adler, H. T., F. S. Nallaseth, G. Walter, and D. C. Tkachuk. 1997. HRX leukemic fusion proteins form a heterocomplex with the leukemia-associated protein SET and protein phosphatase 2A. J. Biol. Chem. 272:28407-28414.
3. Ahmad, K., and S. Henikoff. 2002. Histone H3 variants specify modes of chromatin assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(Suppl. 4):16477-16484.
4. Ahmad, K., and S. Henikoff. 2002. The histone variant h3.3 marks active chromatin by replication-independent nucleosome assembly. Mol. Cell 9:1191-1200.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Ajiro, K., H. Yasuda, and H. Tsuji. 1996. Vanadate triggers the transition from chromosome condensation to decondensation in a mitotic mutant (tsTM13) inactivation of p34cdc2/H1 kinase and dephosphorylation of mitosis-specific histone H3. Eur. J. Biochem. 241:923-930.[Medline]
6. Ashburner, M., and J. J. Bonner. 1979. The induction of gene activity in Drosophilia by heat shock. Cell 17:241-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Barratt, M. J., C. A. Hazzalin, E. Cano, and L. C. Mahadevan. 1994. Mitogen-stimulated phosphorylation of histone H3 is targeted to a small hyperacetylation-sensitive fraction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:4781-4785.
8. Chang, W. Y., N. A. Winegarden, J. P. Paraiso, M. L. Stevens, and J. T. Westwood. 2000. Visualization of nascent transcripts on Drosophila polytene chromosomes using BrUTP incorporation. BioTechniques 29:934-936.[Medline]
9. Cheung, P., K. G. Tanner, W. L. Cheung, P. Sassone-Corsi, J. M. Denu, and C. D. Allis. 2000. Synergistic coupling of histone H3 phosphorylation and acetylation in response to epidermal growth factor stimulation. Mol. Cell 5:905-915.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Clayton, A. L., S. Rose, M. J. Barratt, and L. C. Mahadevan. 2000. Phosphoacetylation of histone H3 on c-fos- and c-jun-associated nucleosomes upon gene activation. EMBO J. 19:3714-3726.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Dawson, J. F., and C. F. Holmes. 1999. Molecular mechanisms underlying inhibition of protein phosphatases by marine toxins. Front. Biosci. 4:D646-D658.[Medline]
12. Gerasimova, T. I., D. A. Gdula, D. V. Gerasimov, O. Simonova, and V. G. Corces. 1995. A Drosophila protein that imparts directionality on a chromatin insulator is an enhancer of position-effect variegation. Cell 82:587-597.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Guo, X. W., J. P. Th'ng, R. A. Swank, H. J. Anderson, C. Tudan, E. M. Bradbury, and M. Roberge. 1995. Chromosome condensation induced by fostriecin does not require p34cdc2 kinase activity and histone H1 hyperphosphorylation, but is associated with enhanced histone H2A and H3 phosphorylation. EMBO J. 14:976-985.[Medline]
14. Hendzel, M. J., Y. Wei, M. A. Mancini, A. Van Hooser, T. Ranalli, B. R. Brinkley, D. P. Bazett-Jones, and C. D. Allis. 1997. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma 106:348-360.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Hong, Y., E. J. Lubert, D. W. Rodgers, and K. D. Sarge. 2000. Molecular basis of competition between HSF2 and catalytic subunit for binding to the PR65/A subunit of PP2A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 272:84-89.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Hong, Y., and K. D. Sarge. 1999. Regulation of protein phosphatase 2A activity by heat shock transcription factor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 274:12967-12970.
17. Hsu, J. Y., Z. W. Sun, X. Li, M. Reuben, K. Tatchell, D. K. Bishop, J. M. Grushcow, C. J. Brame, J. A. Caldwell, D. F. Hunt, R. Lin, M. M. Smith, and C. D. Allis. 2000. Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 is governed by Ipl1/aurora kinase and Glc7/PP1 phosphatase in budding yeast and nematodes. Cell 102:279-291.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Janssens, V., and J. Goris. 2001. Protein phosphatase 2A: a highly regulated family of serine/threonine phosphatases implicated in cell growth and signalling. Biochem. J. 353:417-439.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Jenuwein, T., and C. D. Allis. 2001. Translating the histone code. Science 293:1074-1080.
20. Kamibayashi, C., R. Estes, R. L. Lickteig, S. I. Yang, C. Craft, and M. C. Mumby. 1994. Comparison of heterotrimeric protein phosphatase 2A containing different B subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 269:20139-20148.
21. Li, M., A. Makkinje, and Z. Damuni. 1996. The myeloid leukemia-associated protein SET is a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A. J. Biol. Chem. 271:11059-11062.
22. Lis, J. T., P. Mason, J. Peng, D. H. Price, and J. Werner. 2000. P-TEFb kinase recruitment and function at heat shock loci. Genes Dev. 14:792-803.
23. Marshall, N. F., and D. H. Price. 1995. Purification of P-TEFb, a transcription factor required for the transition into productive elongation. J. Biol. Chem. 270:12335-12338.
24. Mayer-Jaekel, R. E., H. Ohkura, P. Ferrigno, N. Andjelkovic, K. Shiomi, T. Uemura, D. M. Glover, and B. A. Hemmings. 1994. Drosophila mutants in the 55 kDa regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A show strongly reduced ability to dephosphorylate substrates of p34cdc2. J. Cell Sci. 107:2609-2616.[Abstract]
25. Mayer-Jaekel, R. E., H. Ohkura, R. Gomes, C. E. Sunkel, S. Baumgartner, B. A. Hemmings, and D. M. Glover. 1993. The 55 kd regulatory subunit of Drosophila protein phosphatase 2A is required for anaphase. Cell 72:621-633.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. McCright, B., A. M. Rivers, S. Audlin, and D. M. Virshup. 1996. The B56 family of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) regulatory subunits encodes differentiation-induced phosphoproteins that target PP2A to both nucleus and cytoplasm. J. Biol. Chem. 271:22081-22089.
27. McKenzie, S. L., S. Henikoff, and M. Meselson. 1975. Localization of RNA from heat-induced polysomes at puff sites in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:1117-1121.
28. Millward, T. A., S. Zolnierowicz, and B. A. Hemmings. 1999. Regulation of protein kinase cascades by protein phosphatase 2A. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24:186-191.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Minakuchi, M., N. Kakazu, M. J. Gorrin-Rivas, T. Abe, T. D. Copeland, K. Ueda, and Y. Adachi. 2001. Identification and characterization of SEB, a novel protein that binds to the acute undifferentiated leukemia-associated protein SET. Eur. J. Biochem. 268:1340-1351.[Medline]
30. Mirault, M. E., M. Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. Moran, A. P. Arrigo, and A. Tissieres. 1978. The effect of heat shock on gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 42:819-827.
31. Murnion, M. E., R. R. Adams, D. M. Callister, C. D. Allis, W. C. Earnshaw, and J. R. Swedlow. 2001. Chromatin-associated protein phosphatase 1 regulates aurora-B and histone H3 phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:26656-26665.
32. Nowak, S. J., and V. G. Corces. 2000. Phosphorylation of histone H3 correlates with transcriptionally active loci. Genes Dev. 14:3003-3013.
33. Pandey, A. V., S. H. Mellon, and W. L. Miller. 2003. Protein phosphatase 2A and phosphoprotein SET regulate androgen production by P450c17. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2837-2844.
34. Patturajan, M., R. J. Schulte, B. M. Sefton, R. Berezney, M. Vincent, O. Bensaude, S. L. Warren, and J. L. Corden. 1998. Growth-related changes in phosphorylation of yeast RNA polymerase II. J. Biol. Chem. 273:4689-4694.
35. Pauli, D., A. P. Arrigo, and A. Tissieres. 1992. Heat shock response in Drosophila. Experientia 48:623-629.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Preuss, U., G. Landsberg, and K. H. Scheidtmann. 2003. Novel mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 at Thr11 mediated by Dlk/ZIP kinase. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:878-885.
37. Schultz, D. C., K. Ayyanathan, D. Negorev, G. G. Maul, and F. J. Rauscher III. 2002. SETDB1: a novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins. Genes Dev. 16:919-932.
38. Shopland, L. S., and J. T. Lis. 1996. HSF recruitment and loss at most Drosophila heat shock loci is coordinated and depends on proximal promoter sequences. Chromosoma 105:158-171.[Medline]
39. Snaith, H. A., C. G. Armstrong, Y. Guo, K. Kaiser, and P. T. Cohen. 1996. Deficiency of protein phosphatase 2A uncouples the nuclear and centrosome cycles and prevents attachment of microtubules to the kinetochore in Drosophila microtubule star (mts) embryos. J. Cell Sci. 109:3001-3012.[Abstract]
40. Sontag, E. 2001. Protein phosphatase 2A: the Trojan Horse of cellular signaling. Cell Signal. 13:7-16.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Spradling, A., S. Penman, and M. L. Pardue. 1975. Analysis of drosophila mRNA by in situ hybridization: sequences transcribed in normal and heat shocked cultured cells. Cell 4:395-404.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Strelkov, I. S., and J. R. Davie. 2002. Ser-10 phosphorylation of histone H3 and immediate early gene expression in oncogene-transformed mouse fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 62:75-78.
43. Thomson, S., A. L. Clayton, and L. C. Mahadevan. 2001. Independent dynamic regulation of histone phosphorylation and acetylation during immediate-early gene induction. Mol. Cell 8:1231-1241.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Yang, S. I., R. L. Lickteig, R. Estes, K. Rundell, G. Walter, and M. C. Mumby. 1991. Control of protein phosphatase 2A by simian virus 40 small-t antigen. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:1988-1995.
45. Zolnierowicz, S. 2000. Type 2A protein phosphatase, the complex regulator of numerous signaling pathways. Biochem. Pharmacol. 60:1225-1235.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|