Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2003, p. 6809-6822, Vol. 23, No. 19
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.19.6809-6822.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institut Européen de Chimie-Biologie, INSERM U441, 33600 Pessac, France
Received 15 January 2003/ Returned for modification 26 February 2003/ Accepted 24 June 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activation of Rho GTPases can be achieved in two different ways: by soluble factors binding to cell surface receptors or by extracellular matrix components interacting with clustered adhesion molecules of the integrin family. The Rho GTPases regulate actin dynamics by acting as molecular switches that transduce signals from activated membrane receptors to cytoskeleton organizers (52). When microinjected into fibroblasts, constitutively activated mutants of RhoA generate actin stress fibers and those of Rac1 induce lamellipodia, whereas constitutive active Cdc42 stimulates the formation of microspikes or filopodia (37). Cdc42 interacts with a variety of targets such as Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP), the protein kinases from the PAK (p21-activated kinase) family, and ACK (activated Cdc42-associated tyrosine kinase) (12), thereby influencing a diverse range of cellular responses including cell growth, RNA processing, and intracellular vesicle traffic both at the level of receptor-mediated endocytosis and transport from the Golgi stacks (12).
In addition to stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia, actin can also be arranged into peculiar dot-like structures called podosomes, because they were first thought to represent cellular feet (51). Ultrastructural analysis by transmission electron microscopy showed that podosomes are in fact peculiar glove finger invaginations found at the ventral membrane of the cell and directed towards the center, perpendicularly from the substratum (36). Podosomes share major structural components with focal contacts but are distinct in size, morphology, organization, and turnover. They are composed of a core of actin filaments and actin-associated proteins, surrounded by a ring of vinculin, talin, and paxillin (17). Such actin-based attachment structures are constitutively found in monocyte-derived hematopoietic cells including osteoclasts, macrophages, leukocytes, and immature dendritic cells, where they are believed to play a role in bone resorption, migration, diapedesis, and motility, respectively. In pathological settings, podosome formation has been observed in fibroblasts transformed by the Rous sarcoma virus (51). Recent data suggest that podosomes play a role in extracellular matrix degradation (32) similar to that of invadopodia, a related protrusive structure (7). Thus, podosomes appear to be structures that combine adhesive functions with proteolytic degradation of the extracellular matrix.
Little is known about podosome formation. Distinct molecular pathways have been described depending on the cell type considered, but Rho GTPases are always involved. In osteoclasts, podosome formation is dependent on Rho activity (6, 58). In macrophages, Cdc42 localizes at podosomes but its activation disrupts podosome organization (28). More recently, podosome assembly and polarization have been shown to require the concerted action of Cdc42, Rac, and Rho in immature dendritic cells (4). Finally, the Cdc42 effector WASP has been involved in podosome formation in primary human macrophages, in immature dendritic cells, and in rat 3Y1 fibroblasts transformed with v-src (4, 28, 32), suggesting that Cdc42 could be a common upstream regulator of podosome assembly in distinct cell types.
The endothelial cell cytoskeleton is particularly exposed to remodeling. Cytoskeletal dynamics is of prime importance in the physiology of endothelial cells engaged in an angiogenic or vasculogenic program. In the endothelium, cytoskeletal organization is regulated by adhesive interactions with neighboring cells or the extracellular matrix and allows endothelial permeability and vessel wall integrity. Plasticity is required for correct extravasation of blood-borne leukocytes at sites of inflammation. Lastly, the endothelial cells lining blood vessels are constantly subjected to shear stress, the tangential component of hemodynamic forces caused by blood flow, and this significantly influences their phenotype. In the present study, we have analyzed actin rearrangements in relation with GTPase activity in endothelial cells.
|
|
|---|
Cells transfection. Cells were transfected by using TransFast reagent (Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were seeded on coverslips at 50 to 70% confluence 1 day before transfection. For each coverslip, 0.5 µg of DNA, 1.5 µl of TransFast reagent, and 200 µl of serum-free medium were mixed and incubated on cells for 1 h. Complete medium was added, and cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence 24 h after transfection.
Reagents and antibodies. Puromycin, hygromycin B, IPTG, and Mowiol 4-88 were from Calbiochem. FCS was from Globepharm, and culture medium and antibiotics were from Gibco. Glutathione-Sepharose beads, propidium iodide, dimethyl sulfoxide, lipophosphatidic acid (LPA), bacterial collagenase type IV, fibronectin, and various chemicals were from Sigma. CNF1 and TatC3 were kindly supplied by J. Bertoglio (INSERM U461, Chatenay-Malabry, France). Rhodamine-phalloidin and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled secondary antibodies were purchased from Molecular Probes. Monoclonal antivinculin (hVIN-1) and antiVon-Willebrand factor were from Sigma, and anti-myc (9E10) and anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10) were kind gifts from Doreen Cantrell (London, United Kingdom). Anti-gelsolin antibody was kindly supplied by C. Chaponnier (University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland). Polyclonal Arp3 antibody was a generous gift from M. Welch (University of California, Berkeley). Anti-Rho, -Rac, and -Cdc42 antibodies were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology and Transduction Laboratories.
Expression constructs. Plasmids encoding GST-Rho-binding domain (RBD)-rhotekin and GST-Cdc42/Rac-interactive binding domain (CRIB)-PAK have been described elsewhere (43, 45). Constructs encoding wt, active, or dominant-negative mutants of either green fluorescent protein (GFP)-Rho, -Rac, or -Cdc42 were made and kindly provided by P. Fort (CNRS-UPR1086, Montpellier, France). The GFP expression vectors for N-WASP were previously reported (33). The GFP-WIP and GFP-WASP-interacting protein (WIP)-WASP binding domain constructs were subcloned from pEL vectors (33) into the eucaryotic pCB6 vectors.
Immunofluorescence microscopy. Subconfluent cells grown on glass coverslips were fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde prepared in cytoskeletal buffer (CB) (10 mM morpholineethanesulfonic acid, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EGTA, 5 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM glucose [pH 6.1]) for 10 min at room temperature and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 1 min. After 3 washes in CB, the cells were incubated in blocking solution (1% bovine serum albumin, 2% FCS in Tris-buffered saline) for 10 min, in primary antibody diluted in blocking solution for 30 min, and then in fluorescently labeled secondary antibody for 30 min. Between each step, cells were washed 3 times with Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2 [pH 7.5]). The coverslips were washed in water and mounted on microscope slides with Mowiol 4-88 mounting medium. Cells were analyzed by confocal microcopy with an Eclipse E800 Nikon microscope. The images were processed with Adobe Photoshop 5.5. Quantitation of cells showing podosomes was assessed in three independent experiments in which at least 200 cells were counted.
Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 activity assays. The Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 activity assays are based on the Rap1 activity assay (15). Rho protein activity assays were performed essentially as described in published protocols (41, 44).
Preparation of endothelial cells from aortic explants. Endothelial cells were isolated from freshly explanted human aorta fragments from patients undergoing cardiac surgery by using a modified version of a published protocol (3). The vessel was cut off under sterile conditions and cleaned free of connective tissue. The adventitia was peeled off from the media, and the fragment was incubated with collagenase. Endothelial cells were then harvested from the subendothelial bed and seeded on a glass coverslip in culture medium. The attached cells were then fixed, permeabilized, and processed for immunofluorescence. After 24 h, endothelial cells (80 to 85% cells positive for Von-Willebrand factor) formed round colonies of 5 to 30 cells.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effects of CNF1 on PAE cells. (A) PAE cells were treated with 0.5 µg of GST alone or GST-CNF1 per ml for 24 or 48 h. Cells were then fixed, permeabilized, and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin. Bar, 50 µm. (B) CNF1 activates RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 in PAE cells. Cells were treated with 0.5 µg of GST-CNF1/ml for 0, 2, 6, and 24 h. Cells were then lysed, and active GTPases were affinity precipitated with GST-RBD-rhotekin or GST-CRIB-PAK, eluted from the beads, and analyzed by Western blotting with the relevant antibodies. For each point, a fraction of the lysate was run to monitor the amount of GTPase before precipitation.
|
Activation of Cdc42 causes the formation of dot-like structures and loss of stress fibers. Although the three Rho GTPases were found to be activated by CNF1, we anticipated that not all three GTPases would be required for the observed dot-like structure assembly. To assess the individual role of each GTPase in this process, PAE cells were transfected with plasmids encoding GFP-tagged activated mutants of either Rho, Rac, or Cdc42. Cells expressing recombinant proteins were identified by GFP fluorescence 24 h after transfection, and their actin cytoskeletons were examined by rhodamine-phalloidin staining. As expected (37), the constitutively activated forms of RhoA and Rac1 induced stress fiber and lamellipodia formation, respectively (Fig. 2A). However, GFP-V12Cdc42 induced cells to lose stress fibers and to form dot-like structures (Fig. 2A), a phenotype reminiscent of that observed in CNF1-treated cells (Fig. 1A). Moreover, GFP-Cdc42 localized to the dot-like structures positive for actin (Fig. 2A) and to the Golgi region as previously shown (31). Nevertheless, control experiments showed that this GFP fusion protein was able to induce filopodia in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (Fig. 2A).
![]() View larger version (116K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Activated form of Cdc42 leads to actin-dot formation. (A) PAE cells were transfected with GFP-V14RhoA, GFP-L61Rac1, or GFP-V12Cdc42. NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with GFP-V12Cdc42. Twenty-four hours later, cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence. F-actin was labeled with rhodamine-phalloidin, and cells expressing the GFP-tagged constructs were visualized by the green GFP signal. Dot-like structures are shown (arrowheads). Bar, 50 µm. (B) Established PAE cells in which expression of V12Cdc42 is under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter were induced with (+IPTG) or without (-IPTG) IPTG. Cells were fixed after 24, 48, and 72 h. F-actin was labeled with rhodamine-phalloidin, and nuclei were labeled with propidium iodide. Cells displaying dot-like structures are shown (arrowheads). Bar, 100 µm.
|
The dot-like structures are podosomes. Podosomes represent an uncommon type of actin organization, only found so far in restricted subsets of cells from the hematopoietic lineage and dedicated to specific functions all involving adhesion. Therefore, in the context of endothelial cells, it was relevant to establish whether these dot-like structures represented real podosomes. A stack of optical sections obtained by confocal microscopy showed that actin dots were exclusively found at the ventral surface of the endothelial cell (Fig. 3). The original protocol described by Tarone et al. to evidence the adhesive nature of podosomes was used to investigate the interaction of actin-containing dots with the substratum (51). When cells were gently streamed with a jet of buffer, cell bodies were washed away and dots remained attached to the substratum like footprints of the ventral cell membrane (data not shown). Our data are thus consistent with the definition of podosomes as adhesive structures found at the ventral membrane of the cell and directed perpendicularly from the substratum (36). Vinculin, a focal adhesion protein normally found at the end of stress fibers in PAE cells redistributed to the actin dots (Fig. 4A). In addition, vinculin-containing adhesion complexes were present at the cell periphery but, in most cases, did not overlap with the ends of stress fibers. Compared to focal adhesions, these complexes seemed smaller and thinner and were often colocalized with F-actin, but they did not have the elongated shape of the characteristic Rho-regulated focal adhesion. These spots located at the cell periphery were reminiscent of the previously described Cdc42- or Rac-induced focal complexes (37, 42). Using higher magnification, we observed that vinculin was organized as a ring around actin dots (Fig. 4B), consistent with the podosome structure (29). Gelsolin, an actin-binding protein essential for podosome formation in osteoclasts (5), was detected in podosomes from PAE cells, and tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins also colocalized with the actin dots (Fig. 4C). VASP (vasodilatator-stimulated phosphoprotein) and cortactin were also present in the structures (data not shown). Identical experiments performed on CNF1-treated cells demonstrated the same protein distribution (data not shown). In summary, vinculin, gelsolin, tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, VASP, and cortactin can redistribute with F-actin to form podosomes in endothelial cells in the same way as they do in osteoclasts, macrophages, or Rous sarcoma virus-transformed fibroblasts. However, in contrast with macrophages, osteoclasts, or immature dendritic cells, podosomes are not constitutively found in endothelial cells but can be induced in vitro in response to sustained activation of Cdc42.
![]() View larger version (116K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Actin-rich structures are localized at the ventral surface. V12Cdc42-expressing PAE cells (24 h of induction) were fixed and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin to label F-actin. Optical sections (0.5 µm) are taken from the bottom to the top of the cell by confocal microscopy. Bar, 25 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (96K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Podosomal markers localized at actin-rich structures in PAE cells. (A) Vinculin localization. Established V12Cdc42 PAE cells were induced with (+IPTG) or without (-IPTG) IPTG for 24 h. Cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained for actin (red) and vinculin (green). Bar, 50 µm. (B) Higher magnification of a cell expressing V12Cdc42 and stained for actin (red) and vinculin (green). Note the vinculin rings and the clusters of podosomes (arrowheads). Bar, 25 µm. (C) Gelsolin and pTyr localized to podosomes in PAE cells. PAE cells expressing V12Cdc42 (24 h of IPTG induction) were fixed with paraformaldehyde, permeabilized, and stained with gelsolin (green) or pTyr (green) antibodies together with phalloidin to label actin filaments (red). Bar, 50 µm.
|
WA) which suppresses N-WASP-dependent cellular events has identified a region essential for Arp2/3-mediated rapid actin polymerization. Expression of GFP-N-WASP-
WA disrupted V12Cdc42-induced podosomes in PAE cells (Fig. 6). Using antibodies against the Arp3 protein, we localized the Arp2/3 complex at podosomes (Fig. 7A). It has previously been shown that N-WASP may act in a complex with WIP and that WIP plays an important role in actin-based motility of vaccinia virus and formation of filopodia (30, 33, 53). Using a GFP-tagged WIP construct, we also found colocalization of exogenous WIP with F-actin at podosomes in V12Cdc42-expressing endothelial cells (Fig. 7B). To explore the role of WIP further, a GFP-tagged WASP-binding domain of WIP was overexpressed by means of transient transfection and cells were stimulated to form podosome by inducing the expression of V12Cdc42. We found that the WASP-binding domain of WIP displayed a dominant-negative effect on Cdc42-induced podosome formation (Fig. 7B and C), suggesting that the N-WASP-WIP complex is required for podosome assembly in PAE cells. Hence, the machinery required for actin polymerization is localized at podosomes in endothelial cells, strongly suggesting that an active actin polymerization process occurs at these sites.
![]() View larger version (65K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. L61F37ACdc42 retains the ability to induce podosomes in PAE cells. PAE cells were transfected with GFP-L61F37ACdc42, GFP-L61Y40CCdc42, or GFP-L61Cdc42. Cells were stained with rhodamine-phalloidin to visualize F-actin (red), and GFP fluorescence identifies transfected cells (green). Bar, 50 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (122K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. N-WASP can localize at podosomes and inhibit their formation. The inducible V12Cdc42 PAE cell line was transfected with GFP-N-WASP (a to f) or GFP-N-WASP- WA (g to i), and induced for 24 h with IPTG. Cells were stained with rhodamine-phalloidin to visualize F-actin (red) (a, c, d, f, g, and i), and GFP identifies transfected cells (green) (b, c, e, f, h, and i). In most cells, expression of GFP-N-WASP (d to f) and GFP-N-WASP- WA (g to i) inhibits podosome formation, and N-WASP localized to podosomes (a to c) in a few cells where expression of N-WASP was low. Bar, 50 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Arp3 and WIP localized at podosomes in V12Cdc42-induced PAE cells. (A) Inducible V12Cdc42 PAE cells were induced for 24 h with IPTG, fixed, and processed for immunofluorescence for actin (red) and Arp3 (green) staining. Bar, 25 µm. (B) Inducible V12Cdc42 PAE cells were transfected with either GFP-WIP or GFP-WASP binding domain (WBD) constructs and were induced for 24 h with IPTG. Cells were stained with rhodamine-phalloidin to visualize F-actin (red). Bar, 50 µm. (C) Quantitation of the experiment described for panel B. Cells showing podosome-like structures were counted after 24 h of treatment with IPTG. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (91K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Podosome formation in PAE cells is independent of Rho activity. (A) Inducible V12Cdc42 PAE cells were treated with (+tat-C3) or without (-toxin) 5 µg of Tat-C3/ml and induced for 24 h with IPTG (+IPTG) or not induced (-IPTG). F-actin was labeled with rhodamine-phalloidin. Bar, 100 µm. (B) Quantitation of the experiment described for panel A. Cells showing podosome-like structures were counted after 24 h of treatment with IPTG and toxin. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. (C) PAE cells were transfected with GFP or GFP-V14RhoA constructs and treated with 0.5 µg of GST-CNF1/ml (+CNF1) for 24 h or not treated (-CNF1). Cells were then fixed, permeabilized, and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin. Bar, 100 µm. (D) Quantitation of the experiment described for panel C and of the same experiment performed with a myc-tagged version of V14RhoA. Cells showing podosome-like structures were counted after 24 h of treatment with CNF1. Each bar represents the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (91K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. V12Cdc42 downregulates Rho activity. Inducible V12Cdc42 PAE cells were serum starved and induced (+IPTG) or not (-IPTG) for 24 h with IPTG and then treated or not with 2 µg of LPA/ml for 15 min. (A) Cells were fixed and stained for actin and vinculin. Bar, 100 µm. (B) Cells were lysed, and GTP-bound Rho was affinity precipitated with GST-RBD-rhotekin and revealed by Western blotting with anti-Rho antibody. +, present; -, absent.
|
![]() View larger version (75K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Podosomes are detected on aortic endothelial cells in a primary culture. Human endothelial cells were prepared from freshly explanted aorta fragments and directly seeded on glass coverslips (A) or on fibronectin-coated coverslips (B). Cells were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence with rhodamine-phalloidin, anti-vinculin, and anti-Von-Willebrand factor antibodies (vWF). Note the presence of podosomes (arrows) visualized as actin dots surrounded by vinculin rings. Bar, 50 µm.
|
|
|
|---|
CNF1 does not induce podosome formation in other cell types. In Hep-2 cells, CNF1 induced a thickening of stress fibers and formation of membrane ruffles, the signatures of RhoA and Rac1 activities, respectively (13). On the other hand, in HeLa cells, CNF1 induced the transient formation of microspikes and membrane ruffles (25). The effects of CNF1 appear quite different among the models used. In PAE cells, CNF1 seems to deaminate Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 to the same extent. However, GTPase degradation, which follows covalent modification (10, 22, 24), was more rapid for Rho than for Rac and Cdc42. In PAE cells, major CNF1-induced F-actin reorganization may result from the dominant contribution of Cdc42 activity to the overall cytoskeletal remodeling in this cell type. The finding that only expression of a constitutively active form of Cdc42 could mimic the effects of CNF1 on podosome induction in PAE cells is in accordance with this hypothesis. In endothelial cells isolated from human veins, CNF1 does not induce podosomes but it induces stress fibers (54), a Rho phenotype. This suggests that the effects of CNF1 in various cell types are likely dependent on the fine-tuning of the expression and spatiotemporal activation of individual Rho GTPases.
Indeed, the function of Rho GTPases in shape control, actin organization, and integrin activity seems to be highly cell type dependent. Cell spreading is controlled by Cdc42 in monocytes (2), whereas it is under the control of Rac1 in T lymphocytes (11). RhoA maintains a round morphology in monocytes (1), whereas functional RhoA is required for integrin adhesion with the extracellular matrix in fibroblasts (19). Our data indicate that the observed diversity in cytoskeletal response to individual activation of GTPases is also applicable to podosome assembly. In osteoclasts, RhoA activity is necessary and sufficient to induce de novo podosome formation, whereas activation of Cdc42 is ineffective. By contrast, in PAE cells, activation of Cdc42 is sufficient to induce podosome formation in a process independent of RhoA activity. Consistent with data obtained from dendritic immature cells (4), we found that Cdc42 plays a role in the regulation of the assembly of podosomes in endothelial cells. We also described vinculin-containing adhesion complexes at the cell periphery upon Cdc42 activation. The formation of adhesion complexes seems to be independent of Rho activity, as we demonstrated that active Cdc42 downregulates Rho activity in our model.
In response to either CNF1 or overexpression of V12Cdc42, podosome formation was associated with cell enlargement and multinucleation. Intriguingly, giant multinucleated cells seem to be somehow connected with podosome formation, since podosomes have been described in osteoclasts, foreign body giant cells (9), and differentiated trophoblast giant cells (38), which all display this phenotype at least at one point in their differentiation. However, in these cells, multinucleation results from cell fusion, whereas a defect in cytokinesis resulting in endomitosis is likely involved in CNF1-treated as well as V12Cdc42-induced PAE cells (34). Our data show that Cdc42 signaling is able to antagonize Rho activity directly at the GTPase level. A balance between GTPase activities with profound consequences on cellular morphology and behavior has been described for other models (35, 45, 57). Our data clearly show a facilitating effect of the C3-Rho inhibitory toxin on podosome formation. Rho inhibition by the C3 toxin is sufficient to induce multinucleation but not podosome assembly. These results suggest that although multinucleated cells and podosome formation are concomitantly induced in response to sustained Cdc42 activation, they appear to occur independently.
In one approach to decipher the cascade of events initiated by V12Cdc42 to stimulate podosome formation, transfection of effector loop mutants revealed that effectors of the PAK/ACK/WASP branch were involved, whereas Rac and IQGAP1 were not. WASP, and its ubiquitously expressed homolog N-WASP, are Cdc42 effectors involved in actin cytoskeleton rearrangements. In PAE cells expressing a plasmid encoding GFP-N-WASP, the protein did not aggregate around the nucleus as previously reported for WASP (50). In cells expressing a low level of plasmid, GFP-N-WASP localized to podosome structures. However, in most cells, overexpression of GFP-N-WASP led to the disassembly of podosomes and any other actin structures. In these cells, dissolution of the actin cytoskeleton is probably due to an excessive activation of N-WASP, as Cdc42 converts the dormant autoinhibited folded form of N-WASP into an active open conformation (21). Furthermore, transfection of the
WA mutant form of N-WASP, which lacks a region essential to induce Arp2/3-mediated rapid actin polymerization, completely disassembled podosomes but left actin stress fibers intact. These data suggest a critical role of N-WASP in podosome formation in endothelial cells, a finding which is consistent with other models (4, 28, 32). As expected from these data, the Arp3 subunit from the Arp2/3 complex was found to be associated with the podosome structure. In addition, at the podosomes, we found WIP, a protein that binds the N-terminal region of N-WASP, with no detectable change in podosome numbers. However, overexpression of the C-terminal region of WIP, which contains the WASP-binding domain, clearly decreased Cdc42-induced podosome formation, suggesting a role for the N-WASP-WIP complex in podosome assembly in PAE cells.
Endothelial podosomes therefore appear as conical structures, randomly distributed on, but restricted to, the ventral membrane and confined to contact sites between the cell and the substratum. The presence of endogenous tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, together with the colocalization of proteins involved in actin polymerization and cytoskeleton organization, such as VASP, cortactin, gelsolin, talin,and Arp2/3, thereby confirm that these structures are genuine podosomes.
From a functional point of view, our data indicate that the machinery required for actin polymerization is localized at these podosomes, thus suggesting that podosomes are dynamic structures. We take this to mean either that podosomes are dedicated to a specific physiological process such as angiogenesis, vascular permeability, transcytosis, or extravasation of blood leukocytes or that they represent the manifestation of a pathological status, with inevitable consequences on endothelial cell functions.
PAE cells treated with CNF1 and expressing podosomes display active Cdc42 and Rac, whereas Rho is inactive. A similar pattern of Rho GTPase activities has been observed in the physiological response of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (49). VEGF-treated human dermal microvascular endothelial cells displayed increased migration without podosome formation. In this model, activation of Rho decreases VEGF-stimulated motility. From this comparison, we conclude that endothelial cells from distinct vascular beds may respond differently. Alternatively, the Cdc42 effect which stimulated podosome formation in PAE cells might be outside of the physiologic VEGF response.
A unique feature of endothelial cells is that they are the main actors of angiogenesis, a process involving interaction of endothelial cells with the extracellular matrix. The involvement of podosomes in cell adhesion is suggested by their exclusive localization at the ventral plasma membrane of the cell and confirmed by the footprints left behind when cells are gently streamed with a jet of buffer (reference 51 and this paper). In other cell types in which podosomes are found, they have been characterized as highly adhesive structures or they have been shown to be associated with a migratory behavior. In fact, the migratory or adhesive phenotype seems to be dependent on the spatial distribution of the podosomes in the cells. In osteoclasts located at the periphery, podosomes allow firm adhesion to the substratum during the process of bone resorption. When localized at the leading edge, podosomes promote cell migration (46). PAE cells harboring podosomes are nonmotile cells in the standard culture conditions described herein (V. Moreau and F. Tatin, unpublished data). However, explanted aortic endothelial cells revealed alteration in podosome distribution in response to either collagen or fibronectin. Detailed analysis of podosome distribution under different experimental conditions will help to determine whether cell behavior can be shifted towards a migratory phenotype in other experimental settings.
Besides adhesion, other directions of investigation include invasiveness, trafficking, and transcytosis. The ability of podosomes harboring cells to move across anatomical boundaries has been linked to the presence of matrix metalloproteases in podosomes, so the enzymatic pattern of PAE cells harboring podosomes is therefore under current investigation. A role for podosomes in vesicular transport is another attractive possibility, since both the actin cytoskeleton and Cdc42 affect membrane trafficking. Cdc42 drives vesicle movement through Arp2/3-modulating actin polymerization at the surface of the vesicle in the same way as it does at the plasma membrane.
Discovering the physiological inducers of podosomes in endothelial cells will help to determine their roles in vivo. In this study, podosomes were inducible by sustained activation of Cdc42 and were also found in human primary endothelial cells. But it is not yet known whether podosomes are transient F-actin structures occurring in a given step of a process or constitutively found in defined situations such as pathological settings. Podosomes assemble in osteoclasts as the cells differentiate in response to cytokines such as RANKL (39). In human blood-derived monocytes, podosomes form as cells fuse in response to interleukin-13, and in immature dendritic cells, podosomes are induced by plating cells on a fibronectin-coated surface. Regarding aortic endothelial cells, podosomes could be inducible in vivo in response to inflammatory such as interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor alpha, known to activate Cdc42 in other cell types (40). Cosignals from the extracellular matrix might also contribute to Cdc42 activation or to sustaining its activity (56). Finally, endothelial cells are exposed to hemodynamic forces in the form of shear stress and mechanical strains imposed by circulating blood. These are recognized factors involved in the control of endothelial cytoskeletal structure and function. Shear stress has been found to activate Cdc42 in endothelial cells (27) and could therefore be involved in the induction of these structures in vivo.
Understanding the phenotypic and functional changes brought about by the appearance of these structures will help in unraveling the functional characteristics of these cells, thereby improving our understanding of the numerous and complex endothelial functions.
This work was supported by grants from the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (contract no. 5546) and from La Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»