Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2003, p. 7339-7349, Vol. 23, No. 20
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.20.7339-7349.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0225
Received 8 May 2003/ Returned for modification 16 June 2003/ Accepted 14 July 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cellular mRNAs destined for transport to the cytoplasm are recruited by specific components of the RNA export machinery (recently reviewed in references 17 and 38). The presence of introns enhances gene expression in mammals (11, 18, 34, 67) and may greatly facilitate RNA export under certain conditions (47). In mammals, a set of approximately eight proteins (including Y14, Mago, DEK, RNPS1, SRm160, Upf3, UAP56, and REF/Aly) are deposited 20 to 24 nucleotides upstream of mRNA exon junctions in a splicing-dependent manner (37, 42). These exon-junction complex (EJC) proteins are implicated in several cellular functions, including pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA 3'-end formation, RNA export, conventional RNA stability, and nonsense-mediated decay. Recently, however, the general importance of splicing to RNA export has been questioned (57, 65), and a possible new role for EJC-associated proteins in translational loading has been suggested (46, 55). Although much remains to be learned about the multiple roles of EJC proteins, it is clear that the splicing-dependent recruitment of proteins to mRNA is an important conserved feature of eukaryotic gene expression.
The mammalian UAP56 protein was first identified as a DExD/H-box protein that interacts with the U2AF65 splicing factor during the recruitment of the U2 snRNP particle to the prespliceosome (22). The Saccharomyces cerevisiae UAP56 homolog, Sub2p, is an essential splicing factor that appears to function at an equivalent step in yeast spliceosome assembly. The requirement for Sub2p in splicing is relieved if the nonessential U2AF65 homolog, Mud2p, is first removed (39), suggesting that Sub2p acts, at least in part, to dislodge Mud2p from the pre-mRNP and thereby allow U2 snRNP access to the branchpoint sequence. The yeast REF/Aly homolog, Yra1p, is an RNA binding protein that interacts with Sub2p and functions in the nuclear export of both spliced and unspliced mRNAs (73; see also references in references 17 and 38). UAP56/Sub2p may promote REF/Aly/Yra1p recruitment to spliced RNA (48), and Yra1p recruitment to mRNA depends upon (or is enhanced by) proper mRNA 3'-end formation and, at least for certain RNAs, pre-mRNA splicing (44). Yra1p interacts with the Abf1p transcription factor (31), and both UAP56/Sub2p and REF/Aly/Yra1p are present in the THO transcription elongation complex (74), providing possible splicing-independent means for RNA association.
RDS3 was recently identified in a screen for yeast mutants that show synthetic growth defects when combined with a nonlethal mutation in the CLF1 splicing factor gene (78). Clf1p is a component of the nineteen complex (NTC), a salt-stable collection of 8 to 12 splicing factors (28, 50, 70, 82; J. Woolford, personal communication), the penta-snRNP (71), and the U2,U5,U6-RNP complex that likely represents an endogenous yeast spliceosome (56, 81). Considerable overlap exists in the genes identified by genetic studies with LSR1/U2 snRNA (86), PRP17 (5), and CLF1 (78). These include (in at least two of the three studies) genes encoding the U2 snRNA, multiple NTC-associated proteins (Clf1p, Syf2, Brr2p, and perhaps /Ecm2p and Prp8p), and second-step (or later) splicing factors (Prp16p, Prp17p, Prp22p, and Slu7p). The NTC-U2 snRNP connection is of particular interest as present spliceosome models place U2 snRNA at or near the enzyme's active site. Ben-Yehuda et al. (5) report that overexpression of U2 snRNA suppresses the growth defects of certain SYF1, SYF2, and CLF1/SYF3 mutations, suggesting that increased abundance of this snRNA might stabilize a sensitive interaction between the NTC and the U2 snRNP particle. Consistent with this, heat inactivation of the temperature-sensitive Clf1
2p mutant derivative reduces Rse1p and Hsh155p (U2 snRNP protein) association with the U2,U5,U6-RNP and causes the release of Prp19p and Cef1p from the NTC (81).
The 12-kDa Rds3 protein has five CxxC zinc finger repeats and is highly conserved, with the human Rds3p homolog showing remarkable 95 and 56% levels of sequence identity with the Drosophila melanogaster and yeast counterparts, respectively. Curiously, while depletion of Rds3p from yeast blocks pre-mRNA splicing (78), extensive proteomic analyses have not identified Rds3p as a component of the yeast splicing apparatus (56, 70, 71, 81). Based on changes in drug transporter mRNA levels and drug sensitivity observed in the absence of Rds3p function, Turcotte and colleagues suggested that Rds3p acts as a transcriptional activator (3, 4). If so, the splicing defect observed with the synthetic lethal, rds3-1/slc6-1 mutant (78) might be indirect and caused by the impaired biosynthesis of one or more essential pre-mRNA splicing factors. Here we show that Rds3p is a critical pre-mRNA splicing factor and an integral component of the yeast spliceosome. Extracts that lack Rds3p activity are splicing defective and arrest spliceosome assembly prior to stable U2 snRNP recruitment. In addition, Rds3p interacts with a set of at least five U2 snRNP proteins present in the SF3b subcomplex (Cus1p, Hsh155p, Hsh49p, Its3p/Snu17p, and Rse1p) and with the Yra1p RNA export protein. At the restrictive temperature, the single amino acid change in Rds3-1p blocks interaction with the Ist3p/Snu17p branchpoint binding protein and weakens Rds3p association with the Clf1
2p-sensitive protein Rse1p. These and related data provide evidence for an Rds3p-dependent step in prespliceosome formation and suggest that NTC-U2 snRNP interactions contribute to later stages of the spliceosome cycle. In addition, the recovery of Yra1p with the Rds3p complex suggests a possible additional link between the pre-mRNA splicing and RNA export pathways.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cyhr leu2-3,112 his trp1-289 ura3-52).
Plasmids bearing the GAL1::GFP-YRA1 and the YRA1-ProtA fusion genes have been described in detail elsewhere (73). The plasmids were introduced into the YRA1 shuffle yeast strain (73) (MAT
ade2 his3 leu2 trp1 ura3 yra1::HIS3, pRS316-YRA1) by transformation, and the resident pRS316-YRA1 plasmid was removed by fluoroorotic acid selection (8) prior to analysis.
Protein purification and analysis. The Rds3-TAP complex was prepared as described previously (62) with minor modifications (81) from 20 liters of yeast (for proteomic analysis) or from 10 ml of metabolically labeled yeast. Yeast proteins were 35S labeled by the addition of 1 mCi of Trans-35S (ICN) to 1 ml of yeast concentrated from 10 ml of culture (at an optical density at 600 nm of 1.0). The cells were incubated with the labeled amino acids at 30°C for 3 h. For the temperature-inactivation experiments, the cultures were shifted to 37°C for the final hour of metabolic labeling. The cell pellets were collected by centrifugation, washed once with water, and broken by vortexing the pellet with glass beads for 4 min in buffer A (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 10 mM KCl, 200 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 mM benzamidine, 0.5% NP-40). TAP purification was then performed scaled down for use with the reduced volumes as recently described (81). Where indicated, the NaCl concentration was adjusted to 150, 300, or 500 mM during the binding and wash steps of protein A agarose chromatography. RNase-treated samples were incubated for 15 min at 23°C with 22 µg of RNase A/ml and 444 U of RNase T1 (Ambion)/ml before TAP purification. To reduce contamination by background proteins, where indicated (see figure legends) the released complexes were resolved on a 15-ml 10 to 30% glycerol gradient in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-20 mM NaCl-5 mM MgCl2 after calmodulin release. Proteins present in the bottom two-thirds of the gradient were pooled and precipitated with 6% trichloroacetic acid. The samples were then resolved on a sodium dodecyl sulfate-5 to 10% gradient polyacrylamide gel with Benchmark molecular weight markers (Invitrogen). The labeled bands were visualized with a Typhoon phosphorimager (Molecular Dynamics). Western blots of the Rds3-TAP, Clf1-TAP, and Yra1-ProtA were incubated with a 1:1,000 dilution of rabbit anti-peroxidase primary antibody (Sigma) followed by incubation with a 1:1,000 dilution of goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) (heavy-plus-light chain)-alkaline phosphatase secondary antibody (Gibco/BRL) prior to development with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate-nitroblue tetrazolium according to the supplier's recommendation.
Mass analysis. The tandem affinity-purified protein complexes were size fractionated on a 5 to 10% polyacrylamide gel, stained with silver, digested with trypsin, and assayed by mass analysis after fractionation with a Luna C18 column (Phenomenex, Torrance, Calif.) as previously described (81). Alternatively, the proteins released from calmodulin agarose were assayed by direct analysis of large protein complexes without gel fractionation by two-dimensional liquid chromatography of the tryptic fragments with strong ion-exchange and C18 packing materials (Whatman) on a Deca mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, Calif.). Mass analysis was performed on TAP-purified samples with and without the added step of gradient fractionation. The tandem mass spectra were converted to mass-intensity lists and searched against the nonredundant Owl database with SEQUEST software and the nonredundant National Center for Biotechnology database with MASCOT software. The sums of unique and overlapping peptides obtained in three mass analyses were as follows: Rse1p, 25; Hsh155p, 15; Cus1p, 36; Hsh49p, 10; Yra1p, 11; and Rds3p, 2.
RNA isolation and in vitro splicing. To deplete Rds3p, GAL1::rds3-1 yeast was grown at 30°C in YP broth with 2% galactose (36) to an optical density at 600 nm of approximately 0.20. The yeast was then harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 2x the original culture volume with YP broth containing 2% glucose. The culture was incubated at 37°C for 8 h prior to extraction of RNA (66) or extract preparation as described by Umen and Guthrie (76).
To biochemically deplete Rds3-TAP, 0.5 ml of extract was bound at 4°C for 2 h with 100 µl of calmodulin resin (Stratagene) made up to a 2 mM concentration with CaCl2. The beads were then removed by centrifugation at 4,000 x g for 5 min. We found that considerable tagged protein persisted in the extract after this treatment but that much of the residual Rds3-TAP could be depleted if the extract was then immune precipitated with 100 µl of rabbit IgG agarose (Sigma). The Rds3-TAP-depleted extract was dialyzed against 2 liters of buffer D (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 mM benzamidine, 20% glycerol) for 15 h prior to use in the splicing assays. For Yra1-ProtA and Rds3-TAP purification, 0.5 ml of extract was bound to 100 µl of calmodulin resin as described above. After extensive washing, the bound protein was released with 3 column volumes of IPP150 [150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM Mg (OAc)2, 1 mM imidazole, 2 mM EGTA, and 10 mM ß-mercaptoethanol) and then assayed by Western blotting.
For the Rds3p reconstitution assay, 1.5 µl (
150 ng) of Rds3-TAP protein purified by double-affinity selection (or buffer D only) was mixed with 4 µl of the depleted or inactivated splicing extract and incubated under splicing conditions but without ATP or pre-mRNA substrate for 5 min at 23°C. Pre-mRNA prepared from DdeI-cleaved SPRP51A DNA (renamed RPS17A to reflect the change in the ribosome nomenclature) and ATP was then added, and the reaction continued for 2, 15, or 45 min. For chase experiments, the pre-mRNA was preincubated with the Rds3-inactive extract under splicing conditions for 5 min followed by the simultaneous addition of 1.5 µl (
500 ng) of released protein (or buffer D) and a 50 M excess (150 ng) of cold substrate in a 10-µl splicing reaction mixture. U2 snRNA was targeted for degradation with RNase H (69), and spliceosomes were selected by streptavidin agarose chromatography (85) as previously described. Spliceosomes and snRNP complexes were resolved on 4% polyacrylamide (80:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide)-0.5% agarose gels run in 50 mM Tris-glycine buffer (pH 8.8) overnight at a 30-V constant voltage. Details of the in vitro splicing, spliceosome assembly, and affinity purification assays are published elsewhere (7, 66, 85).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Rds3p interacts directly with the spliceosome. While the spliceosome contains many stably bound proteins, some factors interact transiently with this complex to facilitate conformational changes required during assembly (e.g., Prp16p [68]). Spliceosomes assemble efficiently on biotin-substituted pre-mRNA (e.g., see references 6, 30, and 81). To learn if Rds3p is a stable spliceosomal constituent, spliceosomes were assembled in vitro on biotin-substituted pre-mRNA, recovered by streptavidin agarose chromatography, and then assayed for the presence of Rds3-TAP (Fig. 2). In addition to background bands (lane 1), the anti-TAP antibody recognizes prominent bands of approximately 100 and 32 kDa in total unfractionated extract from yeast cells that express Clf1-TAP (lane 2) and Rds3-TAP (lane 3), respectively. As expected, the TAP epitope increases the mass of each protein by approximately 20 kDa. Clf1-TAP is recovered in spliceosomes purified by streptavidin selection (lane 5) (81) while few or no background bands are present in this sample or in a negative control sample prepared from extract that lacks a TAP-tagged protein (lane 4). Rds3-TAP recovery is greatly enriched in the assembled spliceosome (lane 7) compared with a negative-control sample prepared with a pre-mRNA substrate that lacks biotin (lane 6). Thus, Rds3p stably interacts with the yeast spliceosome under moderate-salt conditions (i.e., 200 mM NaCl).
|
|
Rds3p interacts with protein components of the U2 snRNP and the RNA nuclear export pathway. The impaired prespliceosome assembly observed after Rds3p removal might be explained if Rds3p functions as an integral U2 snRNP protein or as a remodeling factor required for stable U2 snRNP recruitment (for instance, similar to Sub2p). To address this issue, Rds3-TAP was purified from metabolically labeled yeast and assayed for the presence of associated proteins. Five prominent protein bands greater than 20 kDa reproducibly copurify with 35S-labeled Rds3-TAP (Fig. 4A). Four proteins were identified by mass spectroscopy as known components of the U2 snRNP SF3b complex, namely, Cus1p, Hsh49p, Hsh155p, and Rse1p. A fifth protein, the Yra1p RNA export factor, was found to comigrate with Hsh49 (60, 73, 75, 87). No other RNA export factors were found in our analysis of the Rds3-TAP complex, although loss during purification cannot be excluded.
|
CxxC domains are present in DNA methyltransferases and a number of proteins that bind nucleic acids (e.g., see references 16 and 40 and references within). Nevertheless, the Rds3p complex is stable after addition of RNases A and T1 under conditions that degrade all detectable RNA, consistent with the presence of only trace amounts of snRNA present in this structure (Fig. 4C and data not shown). This does not rule out the possibility that Rds3p weakly or transiently binds RNA, however. The Rds3-TAP complex appears intact up to at least 500 mM NaCl (Fig. 4D). With the exception of Ist3p/Snu17p, each of the Rds3p-associated proteins is essential for cell viability.
No reproducible differences were observed between wild-type and Rds3-1p-depleted extracts in the levels or electrophoretic mobilities of U1, U4, U5, or U6 snRNA-bearing snRNP complexes (Fig. 5). In contrast, the mobility of the U2 snRNP particle is greatly retarded after the removal of Rds3-1p (U2*, Fig. 5). This upward shift contrasts with the more commonly observed increased mobility seen with the removal of other snRNP proteins, for instance, the U1 proteins Prp39p (45) and Prp42p (U1*, Fig. 5) (52). The altered U2 snRNP mobility is similar to what was recently reported for Ist3p/Snu17-deficient U2 snRNP particles (27) and is consistent with an Rds3p-dependent contribution to U2 snRNA structure or snRNP protein composition.
|
Mutation upstream of the first zinc finger weakens Ist3p/Snu17p and Rse1p association with the U2 SF3b complex.
The Rds3-1 protein contains an aspartic acid for glycine substitution at residue 20 (i.e., GLLCEKC
DLLCEKC; the first zinc finger of Rds3p is underlined). To learn if this lesion influences U2 SF3b integrity, we repeated the Rds3p complex purification with yeast bearing the rds3-1 point mutation. When corrected for minor loading differences, an equivalent pattern of proteins is recovered from Rds3-TAP and Rds3-1-TAP cultures grown at 30°C (Fig. 6). In contrast, when the yeast strains are shifted to 37°C prior to extract preparation, Ist3p/Snu17p is reproducibly released and Rse1p is reduced two- to threefold in the Rds3-1-TAP-purified SF3b complex. SF3b remains intact when the wild-type control strain is treated similarly. Thus, the rds3-1-induced splicing block is correlated with an altered U2 snRNP structure with reduced SF3b protein complexity.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rds3p was identified as SLC6 (synthetic lethal with clf1
2) based on a synthetic lethal interaction between slc6-1/rds3-1 and a deletion mutant of CLF1 that lacks the second of 15 consecutive TPR protein motifs (78). While Clf1p interacts genetically or biochemically with early splicing factors (e.g., Prp40p and Mud2p), it is critical in assembly only after prespliceosome formation, during and after stable recruitment of the U4/U5.U6 tri-snRNP particle (13, 81). Clf1-TAP isolation copurifies the 8- to 12-protein-member NTC complex and a more elaborate complex that contains the U2, U5, and U6 snRNAs and at least 20 additional splicing factors (81). The latter complex (i.e., the Clf1p-U2,U5,U6 RNP) has a protein and snRNA composition characteristic of what might be expected in a late-stage or postcatalytic spliceosome. It is unclear why Rds3p was not found in the native Clf1p complexes or in other recently described yeast splicing complexes (e.g., see references 56 and 71), although automated analysis filters are known to occasionally exclude authentic protein components from large mass spectrum data sets (2). Small proteins, such as Rds3p (and, as seen here, Ist3p/Snu17p), generate few proteolytic fragments, adding to the challenge of proteomic identification.
The biochemical analyses of the Rds3p and Clf1p complexes provide a possible explanation for the synthetic lethal defect observed between slc6-1/rds3-1 and clf1
2 (78). Two U2 snRNP SF3b proteins, Rse1p and Hsh155p, show reduced abundance in the Clf1
2p RNP after temperature inactivation (81). Similar treatment reduces Rse1p and Ist3p/Snu17p association with the Rds3-1-TAP complex. Thus, for both the rds3-1 and clf1
2 mutations, the loss of splicing activity is correlated with the loss of U2 snRNP proteins, with Rse1p release being the common factor. It seems likely that the rds3-1/clf1
2 synthetic lethality results from a failure to properly integrate a defective U2 snRNP particle into the spliceosome. While the stage of assembly impaired by the rds3-1/clf1
2 synthetic defect has not been determined, the first known NTC-dependent step occurs after prespliceosome formation (references 13 and 81) and references within). Thus, either Clf1p acts earlier in assembly than previously shown or NTC structure plays a significant role in U2 snRNP reorganization during U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNP addition or spliceosome activation.
While U2 snRNP particles migrate abnormally slowly in the absence of either Ist3p/Snu17p or Rds3p (this study and reference 27), spliceosome assembly differs considerably in each case. In an Ist3p/Snu17p-deficient extract, an snRNP-complete spliceosome is formed that also shows retarded electrophoretic mobility. In contrast, spliceosome assembly is blocked much earlier, at the commitment complex CC2 stage, in the absence of Rds3p. The late arrest point for the ist3/snu17-null mutant is intriguing, as the mammalian homolog of Ist3p/Snu17p, p14 (also called SF3b14a), cross-links to the branchpoint adenosine in the spliceosome and therefore may play a role in positioning the nucleophile used for the first catalytic step of splicing (83). In support of this, p14 also binds Hsh155, a protein that contacts the pre-mRNA on both sides of the branchpoint and remains bound through the catalytic steps of splicing (29, 49, 63, 80). Curiously, p14 appears to be located at the center of a deep pocket within SF3b, seemingly inaccessible to RNA (26, 77). The yeast homolog, Its3p/Snu17p, is absent from SF3b complexes after Rds3-1 protein inactivation, and this might contribute to the splicing defect observed in the rds3-1 mutant. However, while haploid yeast strains bearing the ist3::Kanr null are viable (24), the rds3::Kanr mutation is lethal under standard laboratory conditions (24, 78). Presumably the rds3::Kanr mutation presents a more egregious insult to U2 snRNP function. Plainly, Rds3p is no longer present, and based on the results obtained with Rds3-1p, Its3p and perhaps Rse1p association with SF3b is likely impaired. The result is an Rds3p-deficient U2 snRNP particle that can no longer stably bind the commitment complex.
It was surprising to recover Yra1p with Rds3p, as no previous report revealed REF/Aly/Yra1p association with U2 snRNP components. We note, however, that REF/Aly/Yra1p does copurify with mammalian spliceosomes (35, 54) and has been found by proteomic analysis in yeast complexes that contain, among numerous other proteins, the spliceosome assembly factor, Sub2p, and the intron release protein, Prp43p (32). Metabolic depletion of Yra1p, while lethal, does not inhibit pre-mRNA splicing, showing that Yra1p association with the U2 snRNP is not a critical feature of the basal splicing apparatus (although a subtle or gene-specific contribution to splicing cannot be ruled out). Since the majority of yeast genes are intron free, we expect only a limited amount of Yra1p to be snRNP associated. Consistent with this, we find that the banding pattern of proteins recovered with Yra1p is very different than what is observed with Rds3p (Wang and Rymond, unpublished). In addition, while approximately 50% of Rds3-TAP can be recovered from extracts by one-step calmodulin affinity chromatography, only 5 to 10% of the Yra1p copurifies (Fig. 8) (here, Yra1p is expressed as an Yra1-ProtA fusion [73]; IgG agarose was not used in this selection). The Yra1p recovered appears specific, however, as it is much greater than the background observed when Rds3-TAP is not coexpressed (Fig. 8, Yra1p-ProtA, bound). Furthermore, Yra1p has not been reported as a "sticky" contaminant of TAP-purified complexes (e.g., see references 23, 32, and 81). Presumably much or all of the unbound Yra1p is associated with mRNA from intronless genes and from spliced mRNAs after spliceosomal release. Additional work is needed to determine if Yra1p resides within SF3b, binds independently to Rds3p, or associates with undetected components (e.g., trace amounts of RNA) that may reside in the Rds3-TAP sample. Also, the results presented here, while intriguing, do not address the important issue of whether the Yra1p/Rds3p complex interaction is significant in the nuclear export of mRNA from intron-bearing genes.
|
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was sponsored by NIH award GM42476 to B.C.R. Proteomic analysis of the Rds3p complex was supported by the Kentucky NSF EPS-0132295 award.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Aebersold, R., and M. Mann. 2003. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422:198-207.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Akache, B., and B. Turcotte. 2002. New regulators of drug sensitivity in the family of yeast zinc cluster proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 277:21254-21260.
4. Akache, B., K. Wu, and B. Turcotte. 2001. Phenotypic analysis of genes encoding yeast zinc cluster proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:2181-2190.
5. Ben-Yehuda, S., I. Dix, C. S. Russell, M. McGarvey, J. D. Beggs, and M. Kupiec. 2000. Genetic and physical interactions between factors involved in both cell cycle progression and pre-mRNA splicing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 156:1503-1517.
6. Bindereif, A., and M. R. Green. 1987. An ordered pathway of snRNP binding during mammalian pre-mRNA splicing complex assembly. EMBO J. 6:2415-2424.[Medline]
7. Blanton, S., A. Srinivasan, and B. C. Rymond. 1992. PRP38 encodes a yeast protein required for pre-mRNA splicing and maintenance of stable U6 small nuclear RNA levels. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:3939-3947.
8. Boeke, J. D., J. Trueheart, G. Natsoulis, and G. R. Fink. 1987. 5-Fluoroorotic acid as a selective agent in yeast molecular genetics. Methods Enzymol. 154:164-175.[Medline]
9. Brow, D. A. 2002. Allosteric cascade of spliceosome activation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36:333-360.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Brown, J. D., M. Plumpton, and J. D. Beggs. 1992. The genetics of nuclear pre-mRNA splicing: a complex story. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 62:35-46.
11. Buchman, A. R., and P. Berg. 1988. Comparison of intron-dependent and intron-independent gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:4395-4405.
12. Burge, C. B., T. Tuschl, and P. A. Sharp. 1999. Splicing of precursors to mRNAs by the spliceosomes, p. 525-560. In R. F. Gesteland, T. R. Cech, and J. F. Atkins (ed.), The RNA world, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
13. Chung, S., M. R. McLean, and B. C. Rymond. 1999. Yeast ortholog of the Drosophila crooked neck protein promotes spliceosome assembly through stable U4/U6.U5 snRNP addition. RNA 5:1042-1054.
14. Collins, C. A., and C. Guthrie. 2000. The question remains: is the spliceosome a ribozyme? Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:850-854.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Company, M., J. Arenas, and J. Abelson. 1991. Requirement of the RNA helicase-like protein PRP22 for release of messenger RNA from spliceosomes. Nature 349:487-493.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Cross, S. H., R. R. Meehan, X. Nan, and A. Bird. 1997. A component of the transcriptional repressor MeCP1 shares a motif with DNA methyltransferase and HRX proteins. Nat. Genet. 16:256-259.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Cullen, B. R. 2003. Nuclear RNA export. J. Cell Sci. 116:587-597.
18. Deng, T. L., Y. Li, and L. F. Johnson. 1989. Thymidylate synthase gene expression is stimulated by some (but not all) introns. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:645-658.
19. Dreyfuss, G., V. N. Kim, and N. Kataoka. 2002. Messenger-RNA-binding proteins and the messages they carry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:195-205.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Entian, K. D., T. Schuster, J. H. Hegemann, D. Becher, H. Feldmann, U. Guldener, R. Gotz, M. Hansen, C. P. Hollenberg, G. Jansen, W. Kramer, S. Klein, P. Kotter, J. Kricke, H. Launhardt, G. Mannhaupt, A. Maierl, P. Meyer, W. Mewes, T. Munder, R. K. Niedenthal, M. Ramezani Rad, A. Rohmer, A. Romer, A. Hinnen, et al. 1999. Functional analysis of 150 deletion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a systematic approach. Mol. Gen. Genet. 262:683-702.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Farina, K. L., and R. H. Singer. 2002. The nuclear connection in RNA transport and localization. Trends Cell Biol. 12:466-472.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Fleckner, J., M. Zhang, J. Valcarcel, and M. R. Green. 1997. U2AF65 recruits a novel human DEAD box protein required for the U2 snRNP-branchpoint interaction. Genes Dev. 11:1864-1872.
23. Gavin, A. C., M. Bosche, R. Krause, P. Grandi, M. Marzioch, A. Bauer, J. Schultz, J. M. Rick, A. M. Michon, C. M. Cruciat, M. Remor, C. Hofert, M. Schelder, M. Brajenovic, H. Ruffner, A. Merino, K. Klein, M. Hudak, D. Dickson, T. Rudi, V. Gnau, A. Bauch, S. Bastuck, B. Huhse, C. Leutwein, M. A. Heurtier, R. R. Copley, A. Edelmann, E. Querfurth, V. Rybin, G. Drewes, M. Raida, T. Bouwmeester, P. Bork, B. Seraphin, B. Kuster, G. Neubauer, and G. Superti-Furga. 2002. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415:141-147.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Giaever, G., A. M. Chu, L. Ni, C. Connelly, L. Riles, S. Veronneau, S. Dow, A. Lucau-Danila, K. Anderson, B. Andre, A. P. Arkin, A. Astromoff, M. El Bakkoury, R. Bangham, R. Benito, S. Brachat, S. Campanaro, M. Curtiss, K. Davis, A. Deutschbauer, K. D. Entian, P. Flaherty, F. Foury, D. J. Garfinkel, M. Gerstein, D. Gotte, U. Guldener, J. H. Hegemann, S. Hempel, Z. Herman, D. F. Jaramillo, D. E. Kelly, S. L. Kelly, P. Kotter, D. LaBonte, D. C. Lamb, N. Lan, H. Liang, H. Liao, L. Liu, C. Luo, M. Lussier, R. Mao, P. Menard, S. L. Ooi, J. L. Revuelta, C. J. Roberts, M. Rose, P. Ross-Macdonald, B. Scherens, G. Schimmack, B. Shafer, D. D. Shoemaker, S. Sookhai-Mahadeo, R. K. Storms, J. N. Strathern, G. Valle, M. Voet, G. Volckaert, C. Y. Wang, T. R. Ward, J. Wilhelmy, E. A. Winzeler, Y. Yang, G. Yen, E. Youngman, K. Yu, H. Bussey, J. D. Boeke, M. Snyder, P. Philippsen, R. W. Davis, and M. Johnston. 2002. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 418:387-391.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Gietz, R. D., and A. Sugino. 1988. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene 74:527-534.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Golas, M. M., B. Sander, C. L. Will, R. Luhrmann, and H. Stark. 2003. Molecular architecture of the multiprotein splicing factor SF3b. Science 300:980-984.
27. Gottschalk, A., C. Bartels, G. Neubauer, R. Luhrmann, and P. Fabrizio. 2001. A novel yeast U2 snRNP protein, Snu17p, is required for the first catalytic step of splicing and for progression of spliceosome assembly. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3037-3046.
28. Gottschalk, A., G. Neubauer, J. Banroques, M. Mann, R. Luhrmann, and P. Fabrizio. 1999. Identification by mass spectrometry and functional analysis of novel proteins of the yeast [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP. EMBO J. 18:4535-4548.
29. Gozani, O., J. Potashkin, and R. Reed. 1998. A potential role for U2AF-SAP 155 interactions in recruiting U2 snRNP to the branch site. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:4752-4760.
30. Grabowski, P. J., and P. A. Sharp. 1986. Affinity chromatography of splicing complexes: U2, U5, and U4 + U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles in the spliceosome. Science 233:1294-1299.
31. Hieronymus, H., and P. A. Silver. 2003. Genome-wide analysis of RNA-protein interactions illustrates specificity of the mRNA export machinery. Nat. Genet. 33:155-161.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Ho, Y., A. Gruhler, A. Heilbut, G. D. Bader, L. Moore, S. L. Adams, A. Millar, P. Taylor, K. Bennett, K. Boutilier, L. Yang, C. Wolting, I. Donaldson, S. Schandorff, J. Shewnarane, M. Vo, J. Taggart, M. Goudreault, B. Muskat, C. Alfarano, D. Dewar, Z. Lin, K. Michalickova, A. R. Willems, H. Sassi, P. A. Nielsen, K. J. Rasmussen, J. R. Andersen, L. E. Johansen, L. H. Hansen, H. Jespersen, A. Podtelejnikov, E. Nielsen, J. Crawford, V. Poulsen, B. D. Sorensen, J. Matthiesen, R. C. Hendrickson, F. Gleeson, T. Pawson, M. F. Moran, D. Durocher, M. Mann, C. W. Hogue, D. Figeys, and M. Tyers. 2002. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415:180-183.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Johnston, M., and R. W. Davis. 1984. Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1440-1448.
34. Jonsson, J. J., M. D. Foresman, N. Wilson, and R. S. McIvor. 1992. Intron requirement for expression of the human purine nucleoside phosphorylase gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:3191-3198.
35. Jurica, M. S., L. J. Licklider, S. R. Gygi, N. Grigorieff, and M. J. Moore. 2002. Purification and characterization of native spliceosomes suitable for three-dimensional structural analysis. RNA 8:426-439.[Abstract]
36. Kaiser, C., S. Michaelis, and A. Mitchell (ed.). 1994. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
37. Kataoka, N., J. Yong, V. N. Kim, F. Velazquez, R. A. Perkinson, F. Wang, and G. Dreyfuss. 2000. Pre-mRNA splicing imprints mRNA in the nucleus with a novel RNA-binding protein that persists in the cytoplasm. Mol. Cell 6:673-682.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Keene, J. D. 2003. Organizing mRNA export. Nat. Genet. 33:111-112.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Kistler, A. L., and C. Guthrie. 2001. Deletion of MUD2, the yeast homolog of U2AF65, can bypass the requirement for sub2, an essential spliceosomal ATPase. Genes Dev. 15:42-49.
40. Lee, J. H., K. S. Voo, and D. G. Skalnik. 2001. Identification and characterization of the DNA binding domain of CpG-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276:44669-44676.
41. Lee, M. S., M. Henry, and P. A. Silver. 1996. A protein that shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm is an important mediator of RNA export. Genes Dev. 10:1233-1246.
42. Le Hir, H., E. Izaurralde, L. E. Maquat, and M. J. Moore. 2000. The spliceosome deposits multiple proteins 20-24 nucleotides upstream of mRNA exon-exon junctions. EMBO J. 19:6860-6869.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Lei, E. P., H. Krebber, and P. A. Silver. 2001. Messenger RNAs are recruited for nuclear export during transcription. Genes Dev. 15:1771-1782.
44. Lei, E. P., and P. A. Silver. 2002. Intron status and 3'-end formation control cotranscriptional export of mRNA. Genes Dev. 16:2761-2766.
45. Lockhart, S. R., and B. C. Rymond. 1994. Commitment of yeast pre-mRNA to the splicing pathway requires a novel U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide, Prp39p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:3623-3633.
46. Lu, S., and B. R. Cullen. 2003. Analysis of the stimulatory effect of splicing on mRNA production and utilization in mammalian cells. RNA 9:618-630.
47. Luo, M. J., and R. Reed. 1999. Splicing is required for rapid and efficient mRNA export in metazoans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:14937-14942.
48. Luo, M. L., Z. Zhou, K. Magni, C. Christoforides, J. Rappsilber, M. Mann, and R. Reed. 2001. Pre-mRNA splicing and mRNA export linked by direct interactions between UAP56 and Aly. Nature 413:644-647.[CrossRef][Medline]
49. MacMillan, A. M., C. C. Query, C. R. Allerson, S. Chen, G. L. Verdine, and P. A. Sharp. 1994. Dynamic association of proteins with the pre-mRNA branch region. Genes Dev. 8:3008-3020.
50. Makarova, O. V., E. M. Makarov, S. Liu, H. P. Vornlocher, and R. Luhrmann. 2002. Protein 61K, encoded by a gene (PRPF31) linked to autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa, is required for U4/U6*U5 tri-snRNP formation and pre-mRNA splicing. EMBO J. 21:1148-1157.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Maniatis, T., and R. Reed. 2002. An extensive network of coupling among gene expression machines. Nature 416:499-506.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. McLean, M. R., and B. C. Rymond. 1998. Yeast pre-mRNA splicing requires a pair of U1 snRNP-associated tetratricopeptide repeat proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:353-360.
53. Neubauer, G., A. Gottschalk, P. Fabrizio, B. Seraphin, R. Luhrmann, and M. Mann. 1997. Identification of the proteins of the yeast U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex by mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:385-390.
54. Neubauer, G., A. King, J. Rappsilber, C. Calvio, M. Watson, P. Ajuh, J. Sleeman, A. Lamond, and M. Mann. 1998. Mass spectrometry and EST-database searching allows characterization of the multi-protein spliceosome complex. Nat. Genet. 20:46-50.[CrossRef][Medline]
55. Nott, A., S. H. Meislin, and M. J. Moore. 2003. A quantitative analysis of intron effects on mammalian gene expression. RNA 9:607-617.
56. Ohi, M. D., A. J. Link, L. Ren, J. L. Jennings, W. H. McDonald, and K. L. Gould. 2002. Proteomics analysis reveals stable multiprotein complexes in both fission and budding yeasts containing Myb-related Cdc5p/Cef1p, novel pre-mRNA splicing factors, and snRNAs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:2011-2024.
57. Ohno, M., A. Segref, S. Kuersten, and I. W. Mattaj. 2002. Identity elements used in export of mRNAs. Mol. Cell 9:659-671.[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Perriman, R., and M. Ares, Jr. 2000. ATP can be dispensable for prespliceosome formation in yeast. Genes Dev. 14:97-107.
59. Pikielny, C. W., B. C. Rymond, and M. Rosbash. 1986. Electrophoresis of ribonucleoproteins reveals an ordered assembly pathway of yeast splicing complexes. Nature 324:341-345.[CrossRef][Medline]
60. Portman, D. S., J. P. O'Connor, and G. Dreyfuss. 1997. YRA1, an essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene, encodes a novel nuclear protein with RNA annealing activity. RNA 3:527-537.[Abstract]
61. Preker, P. J., K. S. Kim, and C. Guthrie. 2002. Expression of the essential mRNA export factor Yra1p is autoregulated by a splicing-dependent mechanism. RNA 8:969-980.[Abstract]
62. Puig, O., F. Caspary, G. Rigaut, B. Rutz, E. Bouveret, E. Bragado-Nilsson, M. Wilm, and B. Seraphin. 2001. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24:218-229.[CrossRef][Medline]
63. Query, C. C., S. A. Strobel, and P. A. Sharp. 1996. Three recognition events at the branch-site adenine. EMBO J. 15:1392-1402.[Medline]
64. Reed, R. 2003. Coupling transcription, splicing and mRNA export. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15:326-331.[CrossRef][Medline]
65. Rodrigues, J. P., M. Rode, D. Gatfield, B. J. Blencowe, M. Carmo-Fonseca, and E. Izaurralde. 2001. REF proteins mediate the export of spliced and unspliced mRNAs from the nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1030-1035.
66. Rymond, B. C., C. Pikielny, B. Seraphin, P. Legrain, and M. Rosbash. 1990. Measurement and analysis of yeast pre-mRNA sequence contribution to splicing efficiency. Methods Enzymol. 181:122-147.[Medline]
67. Ryu, W. S., and J. E. Mertz. 1989. Simian virus 40 late transcripts lacking excisable intervening sequences are defective in both stability in the nucleus and transport to the cytoplasm. J. Virol. 63:4386-4394.
68. Schwer, B., and C. Guthrie. 1991. PRP16 is an RNA-dependent ATPase that interacts transiently with the spliceosome. Nature 349:494-499.[CrossRef][Medline]
69. Seraphin, B., and M. Rosbash. 1989. Identification of functional U1 snRNA-pre-mRNA complexes committed to spliceosome assembly and splicing. Cell 59:349-358.[CrossRef][Medline]
70. Stevens, S. W., I. Barta, H. Y. Ge, R. E. Moore, M. K. Young, T. D. Lee, and J. Abelson. 2001. Biochemical and genetic analyses of the U5, U6, and U4/U6 x U5 small nuclear ribonucleoproteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 7:1543-1553.[Abstract]
71. Stevens, S. W., D. E. Ryan, H. Y. Ge, R. E. Moore, M. K. Young, T. D. Lee, and J. Abelson. 2002. Composition and functional characterization of the yeast spliceosomal penta-snRNP. Mol. Cell 9:31-44.[CrossRef][Medline]
72. Strasser, K., and E. Hurt. 2001. Splicing factor Sub2p is required for nuclear mRNA export through its interaction with Yra1p. Nature 413:648-652.[CrossRef][Medline]
73. Strasser, K., and E. Hurt. 2000. Yra1p, a conserved nuclear RNA-binding protein, interacts directly with Mex67p and is required for mRNA export. EMBO J. 19:410-420.[CrossRef][Medline]
74. Strasser, K., S. Masuda, P. Mason, J. Pfannstiel, M. Oppizzi, S. Rodriguez-Navarro, A. G. Rondon, A. Aguilera, K. Struhl, R. Reed, and E. Hurt. 2002. TREX is a conserved complex coupling transcription with messenger RNA export. Nature 417:304-308.[CrossRef][Medline]
75. Stutz, F., A. Bachi, T. Doerks, I. C. Braun, B. Seraphin, M. Wilm, P. Bork, and E. Izaurralde. 2000. REF, an evolutionary conserved family of hnRNP-like proteins, interacts with TAP/Mex67p and participates in mRNA nuclear export. RNA 6:638-650.[Abstract]
76. Umen, J. G., and C. Guthrie. 1995. A novel role for a U5 snRNP protein in 3' splice site selection. Genes Dev. 9:855-868.
77. Varani, G., and A. Ramos. 2003. Splicing factor 1 in the pocket. Structure (Cambridge) 11:481-482.
78. Vincent, K., Q. Wang, S. Jay, K. Hobbs, and B. C. Rymond. 2003. Genetic interactions with CLF1 identify additional pre-mRNA splicing factors and a link between activators of yeast vesicular transport and splicing. Genetics 164:895-907.
79. Wagner, J. D., E. Jankowsky, M. Company, A. M. Pyle, and J. N. Abelson. 1998. The DEAH-box protein PRP22 is an ATPase that mediates ATP-dependent mRNA release from the spliceosome and unwinds RNA duplexes. EMBO J. 17:2926-2937.[CrossRef][Medline]
80. Wang, C., K. Chua, W. Seghezzi, E. Lees, O. Gozani, and R. Reed. 1998. Phosphorylation of spliceosomal protein SAP 155 coupled with splicing catalysis. Genes Dev. 12:1409-1414.
81. Wang, Q., K. Hobbs, B. Lynn, and B. C. Rymond. 2003. The Clf1p splicing