Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2003, p. 7887-7901, Vol. 23, No. 21
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.21.7887-7901.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire 03824
Received 2 May 2003/ Returned for modification 26 June 2003/ Accepted 21 July 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently a number of factors have been identified in yeast and other organisms as either components of the elongating polymerase or as possible modulators of the process of elongation. Biochemical and in vitro studies have demonstrated or suggested a requirement for several of these factors in elongation. As a result of the RNA Pol II structure being recently determined, it is clear that the RPB2 subunit of RNA Pol II may play multiple roles during elongation (16). In vitro evidence confirms a key role for RPB2 because RNA polymerase II (Pol II) containing either the rpb2-10 or rpb2-4 protein fails to elongate well in vitro (41). In particular, the rpb2-10 protein causes arrest at known mammalian pause sites and requires elongation factor TFIIS to overcome the arrest. Moreover, the rpb2-10 allele in combination with a dst1 (encoding TFIIS) deletion causes severe defects in the synthesis of most mRNA in vivo (29) and reduces the induction of a number of other genes (56). These observations suggest that in vivo rpb2-10 actually causes promiscuous arrest of RNA Pol II that requires TFIIS to suppress and overcome.
Other important factors involved in elongation are the yeast proteins SPT5 and SPT4, whose higher eucaryotic orthologs are components of the DSIF complex. SPT5 and SPT4 have been found to be both activators and repressors of elongation. The DSIF complex is known to be important in repressing elongation in vitro and appears to do so by its interaction with the hypophosphorylated form of the RNA Pol II carboxy-terminal domain (54, 55, 59, 60). In the control of hsp70, Drosophila SPT5 is known to be recruited to the transcribing polymerase, although it may also have a role in forming the paused RNA Pol II complex at hsp70 (1, 27). Also, depleting SPT5 in a TAT-dependent system promotes pausing and transcriptional termination, indicating that SPT5/SPT4 can have positive roles on elongation in addition to previously described negative roles (6). It has also recently been shown that SPT4 plays a positive role in elongation in yeast (43). Various genetic analyses have implicated SPT5 and SPT4 in controlling elongation in vivo (22) and initiation (50). In addition, certain spt5 alleles can be suppressed by rpb2-10 or by the presumed slowing of elongation (22). The physical association of the SPT5/SPT4 complex with RNA Pol II further confirms its importance in RNA Pol II function (22).
In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the principal limitation in characterizing the action of factors involved in elongation has been the lack of identification of specific genes whose expression is clearly affected by defects in these elongation factors. For instance, no particular gene whose elongation is affected by these factors has been identified (29, 45, 56), although it has been suggested that transcription of long genes and genes with high G+C content is defective with certain elongation defects (9, 43). Similarly, whole genome microarray analysis with dst1 and rpb9 alleles did not yield particular genes controlled at the level of elongation (23). Moreover, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis was unable to verify in vivo that deletion of TFIIS resulted in increased RNA Pol II occupancy even with a gene whose transcriptional elongation was apparently impaired (28). These results suggest that the pausing that is presumed to be occurring in vivo with elongation defects is difficult to detect either as effects upon gene expression or in enhanced RNA Pol II occupancy. Because many putative elongation factors (SPT5/SPT4, PAF1 complex, TFIIE/IIF/IIH, RPB subunits, TFIIS, and CCR4-NOTs) (13, 14, 17, 19, 45, 49-51) can also play roles in affecting initiation, it is of paramount importance to identify genes in yeast that are regulated at the level of elongation.
Previously, the lacZ gene, albeit an Escherichia coli gene, has been found to be regulated at the level of elongation when expressed in yeasts that are defective in the HPR1 gene (8). The hpr1 deletion reduces transcription through lacZ, apparently because of both its high G+C content and its extreme length (9). We have consequently examined whether other defects in elongation factors also affected expression through lacZ. Our results show that defects in SPT5 and RNA Pol II subunit RPB2 impair transcription through the E. coli lacZ gene but by a different mechanism than that found for hpr1. We show that transcription through genes containing internal polyadenylation sequences is particularly sensitive to spt5-4 and rpb2-10 defects. Most importantly, we identify several bona fide yeast genes containing naturally occurring internal poly(A) sites whose elongation is impaired by rpb2-10, spt5-4, and dst1 defects. Our model is that spt5-4, rpb2-10, and dst1 alleles, which would be expected to cause pausing or arrest during elongation, result in increased usage of internal poly(A) sites. These results are consistent with those of other studies linking downstream pause sites to poly(A) site utilization (2, 5, 61, 62) and imply that elongation pausing or arrest can be studied biochemically and genetically in vivo by using genes containing internal poly(A) sites.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The rates of degradation for GAL1-lacZ, RP51-lacZ, RP51-ADH2, and GAL1 RNA were determined following growth of yeast on galactose-containing medium for 3 h (15 min for GAL1) and shifting to medium containing glucose, as described previously (10). For the analysis of the polyadenylated species of GAL1 mRNA, GAL1 gene expression was induced for 15 min by shifting yeast from raffinose-containing medium to galactose-containing medium. The newly synthesized GAL1 mRNA was detected by using an RNase H assay in which an 18-nt DNA probe (5'-GCCATTTGGGCCCCCTGG-3') complementary to the sequences 133-bp upstream of the GAL1 translation stop codon was hybridized to total yeast RNA prior to RNase H cleavage (52). The resultant GAL1 3' polyadenylated species were detected by Northern analysis by using a probe that was complementary to the 3' end of GAL1 (5'-GCCCAATGCTGGTTTAGAGACGATGATAGCATTTTCTAGCTCAGCATCAGTGATCTTAGGG-3').
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The rpb2-10, rpb2-4, spt5-4, and spt4 alleles reduce the ability of RNA Pol II to form full-length lacZ mRNA. To address whether transcriptional elongation through the lacZ gene was being impaired by the above-described rpb2, spt5, and spt4 alleles, we used the quantitative S1 nuclease protection assay (13) to identify the abundance of lacZ transcripts that were full length. To do this, we compared the abundance of total lacZ mRNA to the abundance of full-length lacZ mRNA. Previously, it was shown by using Northern analysis that an hpr1 deletion blocked the synthesis of lacZ mRNA (8). In our assay system, hpr1 similarly displayed an inability to form full-length lacZ mRNA regardless of the promoter. Comparing an hpr1 strain to its isogenic parent, we observed fourfold less full-length lacZ mRNA (corresponding to 3'-end bands) than total lacZ RNA (corresponding to 5'-end bands) (Fig. 1A and data not shown).
|
Note that, in agreement with the results of other studies (32, 58), these S1 analyses indicate that, due to differences in length and sequence, oligonucleotide probes can display different degrees of stable binding to the same mRNA and hence different apparent levels of mRNA. Because of these inherent differences in stability of binding between the individual probes and a given mRNA, only the ratios of 5' to 3' mRNA levels can be compared between a particular mutant and its isogenic parent. Importantly several of these mutants can affect the overall abundance of a particular mRNA that results in either an increased or reduced level of total mRNA levels relative to that of the wild type (for example, see spt5-4, Fig. 1C and 3B). The rpb2-4 and rpb2-10 alleles also reduced total FKS1-lacZ expression (Fig. 1B). However, as we were interested in comparing the relative abilities of different elongation defects to reduce the formation of the full-length mRNA, alterations in the level of initiation of the transcript did not affect these comparisons.
|
|
spt5 and rpb2 defects may enhance use of cryptic poly(A) sites in lacZ. The above observations indicate that lacZ mRNA formation is particularly sensitive to SPT5 and RPB2 defects. One model to explain these data is that transcriptional pausing or arrest caused by the spt5-4, spt4, rpb2-10, and rpb2-4 alleles results in increased utilization of known cryptic poly(A) sites located within the lacZ gene (8, 44). An alternative hypothesis for how hpr1 affects lacZ has been suggested: that the long length of lacZ or its high G+C content contributes to its impaired transcription (9). spt5-4 and rpb2-10 had no effect on transcription through the native YAT1 gene, which is extremely G+C rich (Fig. 4A). hpr1 and spt4 have both been shown to reduce overall YAT1 gene expression, presumably by effects on elongation (9, 43). We also found that spt5-4 reduced the overall expression of YAT1 relative to that of the wild type by about threefold (data not shown). Our results (Fig. 4A), in contrast, indicate that the spt5-4 allele does not specifically reduce the abundance of full-length YAT1 mRNA relative to the levels of the initiated mRNA. Likewise, spt5-4 and rpb2-10 did not affect transcription through NOT1, a 6.5-kb transcript (Fig. 4A), suggesting that it is not the length per se of lacZ which impedes expression. Finally, rpb2-4, rpb2-10, and spt5-4 did not affect full-length ADH2 expression (Fig. 4A), although they all affected ADH2-lacZ expression (Table 3 and data not shown).
If the poly(A) usage model were correct, the incompletely formed lacZ RNA would be polyadenylated. We would expect, therefore, that when polyadenylated enriched RNA is analyzed, both spt5-4 and rpb2-10 would reduce the formation of full-length lacZ mRNA to the same extent that they reduce full-length lacZ RNA formation when total RNA is analyzed. As shown in Fig. 4B, rpb2-10 and spt5-4 affected the formation of full-length lacZ polyadenylated RNA to the same degree as they affected the formation of full-length lacZ RNA isolated from total RNA. These results support the model that spt5-4 and rpb2-10 enhance utilization of the cryptic poly(A) sites in lacZ (44) and do not simply cause RNA Pol II to cease transcription, resulting in shortened RNAs lacking poly(A) tails. Northern analysis, however, was unable to detect discrete shortened RNAs, probably because of multiple diffuse ends (data not shown).
spt5-4 and rpb2-10 enhance utilization of defective ADH2 poly(A) sites. If spt5-4 and rpb2-10 were causing increased pausing or arrest that results in subsequent upstream poly(A) site utilization, then it would be expected that these mutations should be able to enhance the use of known defective poly(A) sites internal to genes. To test this hypothesis, we utilized the previously described ADH2 defective poly(A) sites that have been used in a poly(A) site usage assay (26). For this assay, as shown in Fig. 5A, the 3' end of the ADH2 gene containing its poly(A) signaling sequences was embedded within the RP51 intron. Usage of the ADH2 poly(A) cleavage site promotes the formation of a short mRNA that does not include downstream RP51 sequences that are fused to lacZ (26). Read-through of the poly(A) site, on the other hand, promotes splicing of the intron and synthesis through lacZ. We monitored these two alternative events by quantitating with an S1 nuclease protection assay the relative amount of mRNA that is expressed by using either probe 1, which overlaps the 5' RP51 junction of the exon and intron [thus measuring mRNA resulting from ADH2 poly(A) site usage], or probe 2, which is at 150 bp within the lacZ gene [thus measuring RNA in which the poly(A) site has not been used and splicing has occurred]. As shown in Fig. 3, transcription through the first 500 bp of lacZ is unaffected by spt5-4 or rpb2-10 alleles.
|
In an spt5-4 strain, however, the defective poly(A) sites in pL401 and pL402 display increased usage. The ratio of ADH2 poly(A) site usage RNA (probe 1) to that of read-through RNA (probe 2) increased about five- to sixfold in both cases relative to the ratio observed in the wild type (Fig. 5B, upper panel; compare lanes 5 and 6 to lanes 2 and 3). In contrast, the spt5-242 allele, which does not affect lacZ expression, did not have a corresponding effect on poly(A) site usage in pL401 and pL402 (Fig. 5B, upper panel, lanes 8 and 9). Exactly the same results were obtained for the rpb2 alleles as were observed for spt5. rpb2-10, which reduces lacZ expression, increased the ratio of poly(A) site usage RNA (probe 1) to that of read-through RNA (probe 2) by about three- and fivefold relative to that for the wild-type ratio in plasmids pL401 and pL402, respectively (Fig. 5B, lower panel; compare lanes 5 and 6 to lanes 2 and 3). rpb2-7, which does not affect lacZ, also did not affect pL401 and pL402.
Northern analysis was used to confirm this increased utilization of the ADH2 poly(A) sites in rpb2-10 and spt5-4 backgrounds (Fig. 5C). The spt5-4 and rpb2-10 alleles resulted in increased utilization of the internal ADH2 poly(A) site for pL401 relative to that observed for the wild type (Fig. 5C; compare lanes 4 and 8 to lanes 2 and 6, respectively). As shown in Fig. 5C, lanes 4 and 8, the full-length RP51-lacZ RNA becomes diminished relative to that of the wild type without the formation of any smaller RNA products other than those of the RP51-ADH2 species. These data indicate that the spt5-4 and rpb2-10 alleles enhance utilization of an upstream, partially defective poly(A) site.
One alternative explanation for these results with the ADH2 poly(A) usage assay is that spt5-4 and rpb2-10 decrease the rate of degradation of the short RP51-ADH2 mRNA that terminates in the intron relative to that of the read-through RP51-lacZ mRNA. This result is unlikely because, as observed in Fig. 5B, upper and lower panels, lane 4, spt5-4 and rpb2-10 do not cause a corresponding augmentation of the levels of the short mRNA relative to the those of the long mRNA. We did, however, determine the mRNA half-lives for the short and long mRNA and found that spt5-4 had no effect on the half-life of either mRNA (Fig. 2B).
rpb2-10 reduces full-length mRNA formation from yeast genes that contain internal poly(A) sites. Since rpb2-10 has been shown to increase pausing or arrest in vitro, the most likely interpretation of the above results is that increases in pausing downstream of the ADH2 poly(A) site caused by the rpb2-10 allele promote greater utilization of the upstream ADH2 poly(A) sites. These results also imply that rpb2-10 pausing will become manifest in reduced full-length gene expression of native yeast genes if partially functional internal poly(A) sites are present. In yeast, three genes, RNA14, AEP2, and CBP1, have been shown to contain internal inefficiently utilized poly(A) sites (46, 47). RNA14 contains two such sites, whereas AEP2 and CBP1 each contain one. We therefore assayed the effects of rpb2-10 and rpb2-7 on expression through RNA14, AEP2, and CBP1 (Fig. 6A through C). With 5' and 3' probes to the RNA14 mRNA, rpb2-10 reduced the level of the 3' RNA relative to the amount of 5' RNA (Fig. 6A, compare lanes 4 and 5). Over seven such experiments, the average drop in the 3'/5' ratio in an rpb2-10 mutant was 0.62 ± 0.045 (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]). The rpb2-7 allele again displayed much less of an effect (Fig. 6A, lane 6), with an average decline in the 3'/5' ratio for five determinations of 0.91 ± 0.082.
|
|
We further tested the model that rpb2-10 enhances utilization of upstream poly(A) sites by examining the effect of deleting the internal poly(A) sites present in the CBP1 gene on CBP1 RNA formation. When the internal poly(A) region of the CBP1 gene was deleted (47), only full-length CBP1 RNA was formed in both wild-type and rpb2-10 backgrounds (Fig. 7B, lanes 3 and 4). These data establish that the rpb2-10 allele enhances upstream poly(A) site usage and does not just result in a blockage to elongation.
Deletion of TFIIS also reduces full-length expression of RNA14. The above results indicate that defects in transcriptional elongation in vivo can be visualized by monitoring the use of internal poly(A) sites. It had already been shown previously that a dst1 deletion blocks GAL1-lacZ expression, presumably by affecting its elongation (28). We subsequently examined the effect of dst1 by using the defective ADH2 poly(A) signal inserted into the RP51 gene. As shown in Fig. 8A (compare lanes 2 and 4), dst1, like rpb2-10 and spt5-4 (Fig. 5B), caused the formation of increased truncated RP51-ADH2 RNA (for dst1, lane 4, about a twofold-more-shortened transcript relative to the read-through transcript than that found in the wild type, shown in lane 2), consistent with dst1 augmenting internal ADH2 poly(A) site utilization. To further test this hypothesis, we subsequently examined the effect of a TFIIS deletion on RNA14 expression. As shown in Fig. 8B, a dst1 deletion reduced full-length RNA expression by 1.6-fold. This result was confirmed by Northern analysis, in which the shortest transcript was increased in abundance relative to the full-length transcript by twofold (Fig. 8C). Combining a dst1 deletion with an rpb2-10 allele did not result, however, in any significantly worse effects than those observed with the rpb2-10 allele alone (Fig. 8C). These observations identify the first native gene in vivo whose elongation is impaired by deletion of TFIIS.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has previously been shown in vitro and in vivo that transcriptional pausing downstream to a poly(A) site promotes polyadenylation and cleavage of the RNA in both yeast and mammalian cells (2, 5, 40, 61). These observations are consistent with several observations for the requirement of RNA Pol II in 3' processing (24, 34, 42). We have established in this report that defects in SPT5, SPT4, RPB2, and TFIIS, all factors involved in transcriptional elongation, affect mRNA formation in vivo of genes containing internal poly(A) sites. We postulate, therefore, that transcriptional pausing caused by defects in elongation factors enhances internal poly(A) site usage and consequently increases truncated mRNA formation relative to that of full-length mRNA.
Several pieces of evidence support our hypothesis. First, mutations in SPT5, SPT4, and RPB2 (such as spt5-4, spt4, rbp2-4, and rpb2-10 alleles) reduced full-length RNA formation in lacZ, a gene known to contain cryptic poly(A) sites (44). Other SPT5 or RPB2 mutations had no effect on full-length lacZ RNA formation, indicating that this effect was allele specific. Second, the truncated lacZ RNAs were polyadenylated. Third, these SPT5 and RPB2 defects did not affect full-length mRNA formation for genes such as YAT1 or NOT1 containing high G+C content or excessive length that lacked internal poly(A) sites, indicating that their effects on elongation occurred by a mechanism different from or in addition to that ascribed to HPR1 (9). Fourth, we showed that spt5-4, rpb2-10, and dst1 alleles can enhance the usage of defective ADH2 poly(A) sites embedded within the RP51 gene. The other SPT5 or RPB2 alleles, which did not affect lacZ expression, also had no effect on ADH2-defective poly(A) site usage. Importantly, the rpb2-10 allele, which is known to cause increased pausing in vitro and to block in vitro transcriptional elongation, resulted in enhanced internal poly(A) site usage whereas the rpb2-7 allele, which does not block in vitro elongation, did not display the same effects. Fifth, we showed that several yeast genes with known internal poly(A) sites displayed decreased full-length mRNA expression and increased internal poly(A) site usage with rpb2-10 and to a lesser extent with spt5-4 and dst1. Importantly, deleting the internal poly(A) site for CBP1 in an rpb2-10 background resulted in only full-length CBP1 mRNA being visualized. Finally, the rpb2-10, spt5-4, and spt4 defects affected 3'-end poly(A) site choice in which the usage of the upstream poly(A) site became preferred in strains carrying these defects.
That the usage of the upstream poly(A) site is always enhanced relative to that of the downstream site with these elongation mutations suggests that RNA Pol II pausing occurs throughout the gene and that poly(A) site usage becomes favored at the first available poly(A) signal. Our results also imply that at normal genes such as ADH2, NOT1, and YAT1, where rpb2-10 does not have an apparent effect on 3'-end formation, or the first 1.0 kb of lacZ, rpb2-10-induced RNA Pol II pausing probably still occurs but is not significant enough in vivo to cause reduced levels of 3' RNA formation relative to that of 5' RNA levels. Only when a cryptic or defective poly(A) site is present can the pausing be visualized as reduced normal 3'-end formation due to increased poly(A) site usage. This interpretation is consistent with the observation that rpb2-10 did not appear to affect transcription in vivo even when a known in vitro arrest site was introduced into a gene (57). Relatedly, dst1 did not affect RNA Pol II occupancy at the lacZ gene (28), implying that enhanced pausing caused by dst1 or rpb2-10 may not have noticeable effects on measurable RNA Pol II association with the gene. The known effects of rpb2-10, dst1, spt5-4, or spt4 on many genes' expression, either positive or negative (50, 56), must therefore be interpreted carefully as to whether they are due to transcriptional initiation or elongation defects. The observation that these defects did not result in reductions in full-length mRNA formation for long genes such as NOT1 or genes with a very high G+C content such as YAT1 does not imply that spt5, rpb2, or dst1 strains were not impaired in transcribing through these genes. For example, YAT1 total mRNA expression was decreased in an spt5-4 or rpb2-10 background, but we are unable to ascertain whether this effect is at the level of transcriptional initiation or not.
Interestingly, it has been shown that nonfermentative growth conditions promote increased poly(A) site cleavage at the RNA14 1.1-kb site and enhanced internal poly(A) site cleavage at CBP1 and AEP2 (46). These effects of nonfermentative growth on RNA14, CBP1, and AEP2 expression are similar to those observed for rpb2-10 and suggest that they occur by a similar mechanism, that is, by causing increased RNA Pol II pausing. Several stress conditions have also been observed to enhance SUA7 upstream poly(A) site utilization (25). Nonfermentative growth and other stress conditions may impair elongation and thereby alter poly(A) site utilization. However, the effects of the several elongation defects on internal poly(A) site usage that we observed would occur in addition to the nonfermentative growth effect since all of our experiments were conducted under glycerol growth conditions.
While rpb2-10 can result in decreased full-length RNA formation for several yeast genes containing internal poly(A) sites, such as RNA14, CBP1, and AEP2 (46, 47), and differential 3'-end poly(A) usage at GAL1, spt5-4 clearly affected only full-length RNA14 RNA formation and 3'-end choice of GAL1. This difference in behavior may be due to sequence differences between RNA14, CBP1, and AEP2. While CBP1 and AEP2 each contain one internal poly(A) site, RNA14 contains two internal poly(A) sites, which may allow a greater amplification of the effect caused by pausing or arrest. RNA14 and the 3' end of GAL1 may also contain specific sequences that can result in more pausing. Alternatively, the spt5-4 allele may have a weaker effect on elongation than rpb2-10.
It could be argued that the spt5, spt4, rpb2, and dst1 alleles affect full-length RNA formation not by blocking RNA elongation but by directly enhancing the polyadenylation and cleavage process at upstream poly(A) sites. While we cannot formally exclude this possibility, several factors suggest otherwise. First, these alleles have displayed a number of effects on elongation and are known to be involved in elongation. Second, in vitro evidence has shown that rpb2-10 causes RNA Pol II to pause, while rpb2-7 had no effect (41). Similarly, rpb2-10 can strongly decrease full-length lacZ RNA formation and enhance defective ADH2 poly(A) site usage, whereas rpb2-7 had no effect in our experiments. Although rpb2-7 did reduce RNA14, CBP1, and AEP2 full-length RNA formation to a limited extent, rpb2-10 displayed much stronger effects. In addition, while SPT5 has been indicated to play a role in transcription initiation, elongation, and mRNA capping (22, 39, 49, 50, 54, 55, 59, 60), it has not been identified as affecting polyadenylation or cleavage directly, although through its contacts to RNA Pol II it can immunoprecipitate with polyadenylation or cleavage factors (30). Finally, known defects in poly(A) cleavage or adenylation factors that reduce poly(A) site utilization have not been shown to enhance upstream poly(A) site use as presented herein (C. Moore, personal communication). However, in mammalian systems alternations in the activity or abundance of the 64-kDa subunit of CstF polyadenylation factor can in some circumstances influence poly(A) site choice (20). It remains possible, therefore, that the rpb2-10, spt5-4, and dst1 defects could exert indirect effects on the activities of poly(A) cleavage or adenylation factors.
Many genes with alternative poly(A) sites have been identified and characterized in mammalian cells, yeast, and several types of viruses. Differential poly(A) site choice of some genes is regulated by development stages or in different tissues in mammalian cells (20). More than 5,000 human and 1,000 mouse genes with two or more poly(A) sites have been identified by using expressed sequence tag data (3). Therefore, regulation of poly(A) site choice is an important method for regulating certain mRNA levels in different cellular environments. The results presented herein indicate that the elongation process, through effects on transcriptional pausing or arrest, may also regulate mRNA levels by affecting poly(A) site choice. Since the same mRNA with different poly(A) site ends can display vastly different deadenylation rates and mRNA stabilities, altering poly(A) site choice could greatly influence protein translation and abundance in the cell. In addition, more than 1,000 yeast genes could contain internal poly(A) sites (21). It is obvious, therefore, that the proper regulation of pausing or arrest in vivo will be extremely important in maintaining both the formation and fidelity of full-length mRNA.
Not only do our results confirm an in vivo connection between transcription elongation and polyadenylation or cleavage, but they also provide a method to examine transcriptional elongation in vivo. The enhanced utilization of internal poly(A) sites that occurs as a result of defects in elongation factors can be used to develop appropriate genetic assays for identifying novel elongation factors and elucidating their mechanisms in transcriptional elongation and for analyzing the types of DNA sites that affect transcriptional elongation in vivo.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported by NIH grant GM41215 to C.L.D. and by HATCH project H291.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Scientific contribution no. 2087 from the New Hampshire Agriculture Experiment Station. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Aranda, A., and N. J. Proudfoot. 1999. Definition of transcriptional pause elements in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1251-1261.
3. Beaudoing, E., and D. Gautheret. 2001. Identification of alternate polyadenylation sites and analysis of their tissue distribution using EST data. Genome Res. 11:1520-1526.
4. Berger, S. L., B. Pina, N. Silverman, G. A. Marcus, J. Agapite, J. L. Regier, S. J. Triezenberg, and L. Guarente. 1992. Genetic isolation of ADA2: a potential transcriptional adaptor required for function of certain acidic activation domains. Cell 70:251-265.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Birse, C. E., B. A. Lee, K. Hansen, and N. J. Proudfoot. 1997. Transcriptional termination signals for RNA polymerase II in fission yeast. EMBO J. 16:3633-3643.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Bourgeois, C. F., Y. K. Kim, M. J. Churcher, M. J. West, and J. Karn. 2002. Spt5 cooperates with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat by preventing premature RNA release at terminator sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:1079-1093.
7. Calvo, O., and J. Manley. 2001. Evolutionarily conserved interaction between CstF-64 and PC4 links transcription, polyadenylation, and termination. Mol. Cell 7:1013-1023.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Chavez, S., and A. Aguilera. 1997. The yeast HPR1 gene has a functional role in transcriptional elongation that uncovers a novel source of genome instability. Genes Dev. 11:3459-3470.
9. Chavez, S., M. Garcia-Rubio, F. Prado, and A. Aguilera. 2001. Hpr1 is preferentially required for transcription of either long or G+C-rich DNA sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:7054-7064.
10. Chen, J., Y. C. Chiang, and C. L. Denis. 2002. CCR4, a 3'-5' poly(A) RNA and ssDNA exonuclease, is the catalytic component of the cytoplasmic deadenylase. EMBO J. 21:1414-1426.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Chen, J., J. Rappsilber, Y. C. Chiang, P. Russell, M. Mann, and C. L. Denis. 2001. Purification and characterization of the 1.0 MDa CCR4-NOT complex identifies two novel components of the complex. J. Mol. Biol. 314:683-694.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Chiang, Y. C., P. Komarnitsky, D. Chase, and C. L. Denis. 1996. ADR1 activation domains contact the histone acetyltransferase GCN5 and the core transcriptional factor TFIIB. J. Biol. Chem. 271:32359-32365.
13. Collart, M. A., and K. Struhl. 1993. CDC39, an essential nuclear protein that negatively regulates transcription and differentially affects the constitutive and inducible HIS3 promoters. EMBO J. 12:177-186.[Medline]
14. Conaway, J. W., A. Shilatifard, A. Dvir, and R. C. Conaway. 2000. Control of elongation by RNA polymerase II. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:375-380.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Cook, W. J., and C. L. Denis. 1993. Identification of three genes required for the glucose-dependent transcription of the yeast transcriptional activator ADR1. Curr. Genet. 23:192-200.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Cramer, P., D. A. Bushnell, J. Fu, A. L. Gnatt, B. Maier-Davis, N. E. Thompson, R. R. Burgess, A. M. Edwards, P. R. David, and R. D. Kornberg. 2000. Architecture of RNA polymerase II and implications for the transcription mechanism. Science 288:640-649.
17. Denis, C. L., Y. C. Chiang, Y. Cui, and J. Chen. 2001. Genetic evidence supports a role for the yeast CCR4-NOT complex in transcriptional elongation. Genetics 158:627-634.
18. Denis, C. L., J. Ferguson, and E. T. Young. 1983. mRNA levels for the fermentative alcohol dehydrogenase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae decrease upon growth on a nonfermentable carbon source. J. Biol. Chem. 258:1165-1171.
19. Denis, C. L., and T. Malvar. 1990. The CCR4 gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for both nonfermentative and spt-mediated gene expression. Genetics 124:283-291.[Abstract]
20. Edwalds-Gilbert, G., K. L. Veraldi, and C. Milcarek. 1997. Alternative poly(A) site selection in complex transcription units: means to an end? Nucleic Acids Res. 25:2547-2561.
21. Graber, J. H., G. D. McAllister, and T. F. Smith. 2002. Probabilistic prediction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNA 3'-processing sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1851-1858.
22. Hartzog, G. A., T. Wada, H. Handa, and F. Winston. 1998. Evidence that Spt4, Spt5, and Spt6 control transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 12:357-369.
23. Hemming, S. A., D. B. Jansma, P. F. Macgregor, A. Goryachev, J. D. Friesen, and A. M. Edwards. 2000. RNA polymerase II subunit Rpb9 regulates transcription elongation in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 275:35506-35511.
24. Hirose, Y., and J. L. Manley. 1998. RNA polymerase II is an essential mRNA polyadenylation factor. Nature 395:93-96.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Hoopes, B. C., G. D. Bowers, and M. J. DiVisconte. 2000. The two Saccharomyces cerevisiae SUA7 (TFIIB) transcripts differ at the 3'-end and respond differently to stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:4435-4443.
26. Hyman, L. E., S. H. Seiler, J. Whoriskey, and C. L. Moore. 1991. Point mutations upstream of the yeast ADH2 poly(A) site significantly reduce the efficiency of 3'-end formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:2004-2012.
27. Kaplan, C. D., J. R. Morris, C. Wu, and F. Winston. 2000. Spt5 and Spt6 are associated with active transcription and have characteristics of general elongation factors in D. melanogaster. Genes Dev. 14:2623-2634.
28. Kulish, D., and K. Struhl. 2001. TFIIS enhances transcriptional elongation through an artificial arrest site in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:4162-4168.
29. Lennon, J. C., III, M. Wind, L. Saunders, M. B. Hock, and D. Reines. 1998. Mutations in RNA polymerase II and elongation factor SII severely reduce mRNA levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:5771-5779.
30. Lindstrom, D. L., S. L. Squazzo, N. Muster, T. A. Burckin, K. C. Wachter, C. A. Emigh, J. A. McCleery, J. R. Yates III, and G. A. Hartzog. 2003. Dual roles for Spt5 in pre-mRNA processing and transcription elongation revealed by identification of Spt5-associated proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1368-1378.
31. Liu, H. Y., V. Badarinarayana, D. C. Audino, J. Rappsilber, M. Mann, and C. L. Denis. 1998. The NOT proteins are part of the CCR4 transcriptional complex and affect gene expression both positively and negatively. EMBO J. 17:1096-1106.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Luebke, K. J., R. P. Balog, and H. R. Garner. 2003. Prioritized selection of oligodeoxyribonucleotide probes for efficient hybridization to RNA transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:750-758.
33. Maquat, L. E., and G. G. Carmichael. 2001. Quality control of mRNA function. Cell 104:173-176.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. McCracken, S., N. Fong, E. Rosonina, K. Yankulov, G. Brothers, D. Siderovski, A. Hessel, S. Foster, S. Shuman, and D. L. Bentley. 1997. 5'-capping enzymes are targeted to pre-mRNA by binding to the phosphorylated carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Genes Dev. 11:3306-3318.
35. Miyajima, A., N. Nakayama, I. Miyajima, N. Arai, H. Okayama, and K. Arai. 1984. Analysis of full-length cDNA clones carrying GAL1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a model system for cDNA expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 12:6397-6414.
36. Orphanides, G., and D. Reinberg. 2002. A unified theory of gene expression. Cell 108:439-451.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Orphanides, G., W. H. Wu, W. S. Lane, M. Hampsey, and D. Reinberg. 1999. The chromatin-specific transcription elongation factor FACT comprises human SPT16 and SSRP1 proteins. Nature 400:284-288.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Otero, G., J. Fellows, Y. Li, T. de Bizemont, A. M. Dirac, C. M. Gustafsson, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and J. Q. Svejstrup. 1999. Elongator, a multisubunit component of a novel RNA polymerase II holoenzyme for transcriptional elongation. Mol. Cell 3:109-118.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Pei, Y., and S. Shuman. 2002. Interactions between fission yeast mRNA capping enzymes and elongation factor Spt5. J. Biol. Chem. 277:19639-19648.
40. Peterson, M. L., S. Bertolino, and F. Davis. 2002. An RNA polymerase pause site is associated with the immunoglobulin µs poly(A) site. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:5606-5615.
41. Powell, W., and D. Reines. 1996. Mutations in the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase II cause 6-azauracil sensitivity in yeast and increased transcriptional arrest in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 271:6866-6873.
42. Proudfoot, N. J., A. Furger, and M. J. Dye. 2002. Integrating mRNA processing with transcription. Cell 108:501-512.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Rondon, A. G., M. Garcia-Rubio, S. Gonzalez-Barrera, and A. Aguilera. 2003. Molecular evidence for a positive role of Spt4 in transcription elongation. EMBO J. 22:612-620.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Russnak, R., K. W. Nehrke, and T. Platt. 1995. REF2 encodes an RNA-binding protein directly involved in yeast mRNA 3'-end formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:1689-1697.[Abstract]
45. Shaw, R. J., and D. Reines. 2000. Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcription elongation mutants are defective in PUR5 induction in response to nucleotide depletion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:7427-7437.
46. Sparks, K. A., and C. L. Dieckmann. 1998. Regulation of poly(A) site choice of several yeast mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:4676-4687.
47. Sparks, K. A., S. A. Mayer, and C. L. Dieckmann. 1997. Premature 3'-end formation of CBP1 mRNA results in the downregulation of cyto