Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2003, p. 9003-9013, Vol. 23, No. 24
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.24.9003-9013.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 2QH, United Kingdom
Received 16 July 2003/ Accepted 25 August 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A remarkable feature of the LMO2 gene is its involvement exclusively in T-cell malignancies when abnormally expressed (24). There are three lines of evidence supporting this contention. First, chromosomal translocations activating LMO2 have only been observed in T-cell tumors. Indeed, a case of human T-cell acute leukemia has been described with both the Philadelphia chromosome (resulting in BCR-ABL fusion), normally the hallmark of myelogenous leukemia, and the LMO2-specific translocation t(11;14)(p13;q11) (6). Further, transgenic mice expressing Lmo2 in the lymphoid lineage or with overexpression in all tissues (16, 18, 22, 23) only developed T-cell malignancies, indicating that LMO2-mediated tumorigenesis is specific to the T-cell lineage. Finally, an unfortunate outcome of a recent gene therapy trial with retrovirally delivered interleukin-2 receptor
c subunit in X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (X-SCID) patients (8) was the development of T-cell leukemia in two cases, following specific clonal expansion of T cells with retroviral insertion in the LMO2 gene (9, 9a). The specific outcome of T-cell leukemia in both these X-SCID patients, despite the use in the clinical protocol of the retroviral transduction of CD34-positive bone marrow progenitors, suggests that LMO2 may influence T-cell differentiation.
Additional evidence for a such role in T-cell lymphopoiesis comes from the finding that Lmo2 is normally expressed in immature CD4/CD8 double-negative thymocytes, before being downregulated as T cells mature (13). Moreover, transgenic mice with enforced Lmo2 expression show a differentiation block at the same CD4/CD8 double-negative thymocyte stage, preceding the appearance of clonal T-cell tumors (17, 18).
Gene targeting experiments have addressed the question of a putative role for Lmo2 in hematopoiesis (32, 35) but have been unable to answer whether Lmo2 plays a role in T-cell development. Null mutation of Lmo2 in mice causes embryonic lethality at around 10 days after inception, due to a failure of embryonic erythropoiesis (32). Thus, effects on lymphoid development could not be investigated. Similarly, the use of Lmo2 null embryonic stem cells to make chimeric mice showed that there was no embryonic stem cell-derived contribution to adult hematopoiesis in these animals (35), indicating that Lmo2 functions in the stem cells (i.e., the equivalent of the repopulating cells used in the X-SCID gene therapy) or their precursors. In both gene targeting strategies, any possible role for Lmo2 in lymphopoiesis could not be determined because the null cells fail to contribute to hematopoietic subcompartments.
An approach to assess a role for Lmo2 in lymphopoiesis is to use a conditional knockout strategy in which the Lmo2 gene is deleted in specific cells in the hematopoietic lineage. We used a deletional strategy based on flanking the Lmo2 gene with Cre recombinase recognition sites (loxP sites) and expressing Cre under the control of lymphoid-specific promoters (Rag1, CD19, or Lck). No changes in lymphoid development were found in the absence of the Lmo2 gene with this approach. Thus, despite its being a T-cell-specific oncogene, functional Lmo2 is not required for normal T-cell development.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2001 genomic Lmo2 clone) to a PstI site
300 bp on the 5' side of the most 3' EcoRI site (Fig. 5A). pLmo2pLXP was assembled by cloning the XhoI-PstI fragment into the XhoI and XbaI sites of pBluescript after filling in the PstI and XbaI sites. A loxP-puromycin cassette (3) was cloned (BglII fragment with filled-in ends) into the unique XbaI site of the pBluescript subclone, after filling in the XbaI site. The MC1-tk fragment was added at the XhoI site to complete the pLmo2pLXP construction.
|
A targeting vector (pKO73hyg) was constructed with the XbaI-EcoRI fragment spanning exon 5 of Lmo2 (see Fig. 5A) from a
2001 clone isolated from an embryonic stem cell DNA-derived genomic library (32). This fragment was cloned into the XbaI and EcoRV sites of pBluescript (after filling in the EcoRV site of the genomic fragment) and a loxP-hygromycin cassette (3) was cloned into the unique EcoRV genomic site. MC1-tk (29) was cloned into the XbaI site to give the pKO73hyg targeting clone.
The embryonic stem clone KO3PU/D3 was transfected with pKO73hyg, and hygromycin-resistant, ganciclovir-sensitive clones were selected. Homologous recombination targeted cells were identified with genomic DNA digested with SacI, amplified by PCR, and including an nuclear localisation signal, an SV40 polyadenylation signal and MC1-neo-polyA (29), was cloned into the BamHI site to yield an in-frame fusion of the N-terminal three amino acids of Rag1 with Cre (Met-Ala-Gly-Cre).
Lck-Cre was made by PCR amplifying the whole Cre cDNA sequence with primers including terminal NcoI restrictions sites; the PCR product was cleaved with NcoI, the ends filled in and cloned into the blunt-ended BamHI site of the Lck transgenic expression clone (33). The transgenic fragment was excised with NotI and injected into pronuclei of fertilised eggs and transgenic strains were developed. One line in which detectable Cre protein was found was selected for further use.
The CD19-Cre targeting construct (a gift from Jurgen Roes and Klaus Rajewsky) has been described before (25). The plasmid was transfected into CCB embryonic stem cells, and targeted clones were identified by hybridization of BamHI digested DNA with a 0.9-=kb BamHI-PstI probe located about 2 kb 5' of CD19 exon 1. Targeted embryonic stem clones were injected into C57BL6 blastocysts and chimeric mice bred to give germ line transmission of the CD19-Cre targeted allele.
Filter hybridization. Genomic DNA was prepared from mouse tissues and 10 µg amounts were digested to completion with BamHI, separated on 0.8% agarose gels and transferred to nylon membranes after denaturation (19, 28). The membranes were hybridized with the Lmo2 genomic probes A or B (32) with random labeling (4) with [32P]dCTP.
Genomic PCR. For genomic PCR of hematopoietic cells, 1000 cells were sorted with a MoFlo cell sorter (Dako Cytomation), directly into PCR tubes and analyzed with the following primers specific for Lmo2 genomic sequences; Primers for detection of deleted Lmo2 A5, 5'-GATGAATTCGTGTCTCTTTCTCCTGCAACTA-3' A3, 5'-GATGGATCCAGGACGGTGGTTTGAGAACTGTTG-3' Primers for detection of Lmo2 exon 5 B5, 5'-GTGGATGAGGTGCTGCAGATA-3' B3, 5'-TCCGTCCCAGCTTGTAGTAGAG-3'.
PCR conditions used were 95°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 63°C for 30 secs and 72°C for 1 min and a final incubation at 72°C for 10 min. For multiplex PCR, it was necessary to add primers A5 and A3 in 4x excess to B5 and B3 to obtain equivalent amplifications for the deleted and undeleted Lmo2 alleles, respectively. A probe for detecting the deleted PCR product was made by amplification of a fully internal, 106bp fragment from the product of B5 plus B3 with primers KO73P plus KO73BN. The sequences of these primers were KO73P, 5'-GGAGATCTGACTGCTTAAGGTGGC-3', and KO73BN, 5'-AGTAGAGCAAACATTCCCTCTGAG-3'.
Western detection of proteins. Single cell suspensions were lysed by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer (0.25 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 5% SDS, 10% glycerol, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 0.05% bromophenol blue) and protein equivalent to 106 cells was fractionated by 4 to 20% Tris-glycine sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride filter. The filter was washed for 1 h in TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20) with 4% powdered skimmed milk at room temperature before 1 h of incubation with a 1:1,000 dilution of anti-Cre (Novagen). The filter was washed six times with TBS-T, incubated with a 1:5000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Amersham) and washed six times with TBS-T. The filter was subjected to enhanced chemiluminescence analysis (Amersham) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Flow cytometry.
Single cell suspensions were prepared from the indicated tissues and preblocked with purified anti-CD16 (Fc-block); 106 cells were placed in FACS tubes and stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-CD4, fluorine isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-CD8, PE-anti-T-cell receptor ß subunit, PE-anti-CD2, PE-anti-CD3, PE-anti-Thy 1.2, PE-anti-B220, FITC-anti-IgM, biotinylated anti-IgG1, PE-anti-Ter119, PE-anti-Mac1, PE-anti-Sca1, PE-anti-CD19 and FITC-anti-CD34 antibodies. CD4-CD8 double-negative thymocytes were prepared as described below and incubated with PE-anti-CD44, FITC-anti-CD25, and FITC-anti-T-cell receptor
subunit antibodies.
Bone marrow B-cell development was monitored according to the protocol of Hardy et al. (11, 12); 107 cells were immunostained with allophytocyanin (APC)-conjugated anti-B220 and biotinylated anti-CD43 antibodies, combined with FITC-anti-CD24 and PE-anti-Ly51/BP-1 for stages A to C or FITC-anti-IgM and PE-anti-IgD for stages D to F. Biotinylated antibodies were detected by subsequent staining with a streptavidin-cytochrome conjugate. All antibodies were from BD Pharmingen. Cells were analyzed with a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems) with dual color excitation when detecting APC-conjugated antibodies, or sorted with a MoFlo cell sorter (Dako Cytomation).
Cell selection with Dynabeads. To perform cell enrichments or depletions, 5 x 107 cells were suspended in 1 ml of PBS containing 1% fetal bovine serum, incubated with 25 µl (107) each of CD4-, CD8-, or B220-linked Dynabeads (Dynal Biotech), or combinations, for 20 min at 4°C. Target cells were isolated on a magnetic particle concentrator, and the procedure repeated on the supernatant. In the case of positive selections, and bound cells were washed three times in the above medium before use.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Lmo2fl;Cre mice were generated for each lymphoid Cre expressing line and initially whole tissue DNA genomic filter hybridization was used to compare Lmo2 gene deletion in hematopoietic tissues (i.e., spleen, thymus, or bone marrow). This showed that Lmo2fl deletion was specifically confined to the target lymphopoietic organs (Fig. 2). The presence of the Rag1-Cre allele caused essentially complete loss of the Lmo2fl allele in the spleen and thymus giving rise to a deleted allele (termed Lmo2del) but only partial deletion in bone marrow, implying that the Rag1-Cre allele causes complete deletion of Lmo2fl in developing lymphoid cells (Fig. 2A). The CD19-Cre allele caused significant deletion in spleen, but very little in thymus and bone marrow, consistent with activity in B cells (25). Indeed, purified B220+ B cells from bone marrow showed
80% deletion of the floxed Lmo2 allele (Fig. 2B). Conversely, the Lck-Cre allele caused
90% deletion in thymus but little deletion in bone marrow, implying that Cre function is restricted to T cells.
|
|
|
Lmo2 has no mandatory role in lymphoid development. The consequence of Lmo2 deletion in lymphoid cells was analyzed with Lmo2fl/lacZ mice crossed with one of the three Cre expressing strains. This strategy for Lmo2 gene deletion obviates any problem which might arise from inefficient Cre-mediated recombination since mice with one null Lmo2 allele (Lmo2lacZ) and one floxed Lmo2 allele (Lmo2fl) were used. Thus, all cells in which the floxed allele is deleted become homozygous for Lmo2 null mutation. Lmo2fl/lacZ;Cre mice were viable and exhibited no obvious hematopoietic defects, with normal bone marrow, spleen and thymus cell counts (data not shown). The possible importance of Lmo2 in T lymphopoiesis was examined by partitioning thymic T cells from Lmo2fl/lacZ;Rag1-Cre mice into various developmental stages with flow cytometry (illustrated in Fig. 5B, stages 1 to 7).
No significant alteration in T-cell stages 5, 6, or 7 was found in Lmo2fl/lacZ;Rag1-Cre mice compared with Lmo2fl/lacZ littermates (Fig. 5C). When the CD4- CD8- double-negative T cells were further analyzed for CD44 and CD25 expression, subfractionating the cells into DN1 to DN4 subsets, we could not detect any significant shift in the four T-cell populations (Fig. 5C, bottom). By contrast, age-matched CD2-Lmo2 transgenic mice, which have T-cell expression of Lmo2, showed an increase in CD4- CD8- double-negative thymocytes (17, 18), which display a predominant arrest at the stage DN3 of development as previously seen (7) (Fig. 5C). Thus, there is no detectable effect of Lmo2 gene deletion on T-cell development, while, paradoxically, enforced expression of Lmo2 in the T-cell lineage causes a profound developmental abnormality.
An analogous assessment of B-cell development was conducted on bone marrow-derived B cells (Fig. 6), as this is the site of B-cell lymphopoiesis in the adult mouse. When these were separated into B-cell subpopulations, by four-color immunocytometry with the established protocol (11), we found that the six B-cell stages of increasing maturity (Fig. 6A to F) were not significantly altered between Lmo2fl/lacZ;Rag1-Cre mice and Lmo2fl/lacZ littermates. As the Rag1 gene is expressed at early stages of both T and B lymphoid development, the lack of detectable effect on B lymphopoiesis argues that the presence of Lmo2 protein is not necessary for B lymphopoiesis to proceed to normally.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The lack of an obligatory role for Lmo2 in T-cell development is paradoxical in view of the specific association of activated LMO2 with T-cell tumors and the normal expression of the gene in DN1 and DN2 T cells (13, 15). It is especially intriguing because enforced expression of Lmo2 in transgenic mice, under the control of the T-cell CD2 promoter, causes a block of T-cell differentiation at the DN3 stage (7), which is the stage at which Lmo2 is normally downregulated (13). This implies that the inability to shut off the function of Lmo2 at the DN2/DN3 differentiation boundary inhibits further passage through the T-cell differentiation pathway and in turn implies a normal role for Lmo2 at this T-cell differentiation stage. Our data show that there is no such discernible role for Lmo2.
LMO2 is a T-cell-specific oncogene. LMO2 has only been implicated thus far in T-cell malignancies. Its discovery by association with recurrent chromosomal translocations in T-cell acute leukemias (24) was followed by its verification as a T-cell-specific oncogene in transgenic models where enforced Lmo2 expression was not limited to T cells (23). The recent development of leukemia by LMO2 activation via retroviral insertion in two X-SCID gene therapy patients (9a) has reinforced this T-cell tropism, as both patients developed T-cell acute leukemias (9).
A possible role for LMO2 in guiding differentiation into the T-cell lineage is indicated by these findings because the source of the cells for the retroviral transduction were CD34+ multipotential bone marrow cells (8). If there is no mandatory role for LMO2 in T-lymphoid development, it suggests that its specific role in T-cell tumorigenesis results from a reprogramming of gene expression after enforced expression in T-cell precursors. Examination of Lmo2-associated DNA binding complexes in transgenic mouse leukemic cells showed that Lmo2 forms complexes which differ in composition from those found in erythroid cells (7). Such complexes could be involved in the transcriptional regulation of target genes leading to a block in T-cell development and onset of leukemia. However, our current results imply that such complexes do not play a role in normal lymphoid development, implying either that they do not form during normal T lymphopoiesis, or that they form but are not functional.
It has been shown that in Lmo2-Tal1/Scl double transgenic mice have increased efficacy in T-cell leukemia development (17). In addition, another member of the family of LIM-only T-cell oncogenes, Lmo1, cooperates with Tal1/Scl in T-cell tumorigenesis and causes an inhibition of the E2A-HEB-mediated expression of the pre-T-cell receptor
-chain. This is thought to contribute to the arrested thymic development seen in Tal1/Scl transgenic mice (13). Moreover, mice lacking E2A develop leukemia of similar phenotype to CD2-Lmo2 transgenic mice (1). Hence, Lmo2-Tal1/Scl-induced leukemogenesis may be due to an abrogation of E2A protein function in T-cell development. By contrast, quantitative PCR analysis showed that regulation of pre-T-cell receptor
chain was normal in Lmo2fl/lacZ;Lck-Cre mice, implying that Lmo2 does not regulate this receptor subunit during normal T-cell development (data not shown).
LMO2 and retroviral insertion in X-SCID gene therapy.
The X-SCID gene therapy patients who developed leukemia as a result of retroviral activation of LMO2, had been infused with retrovirally transduced CD34+ progenitors to rescue the hematopoietic defect in these patients, with a retrovirus expressing the interleukin-2 receptor common
chain which is absent in X-SCID (8). As a number of different chromosomal translocation genes have been identified which appear specific to T-cell acute leukemia (20), it is not clear why only LMO2 has been found in X-SCID leukemia cases.
One hypothesis is that there is cooperation between
chain and LMO2 protein functions, perhaps with the former dictating cell division and the latter cell differentiation. In this situation, LMO2 expression is enforced by the presence of retrovirus (9, 9a), in an analogous way to the transgenic Lmo2 mouse models.
It is intriguing that the LMO2-associated chromosomal translocations in humans appear to be mediated by mistakes of the RAG recombinase (27). The Rag1 gene is expressed in the DN2/DN3 stages of T-cell differentiation and furthermore transgenic enforced Lmo2 expression results in accumulation of DN3 T cells. These combined observations suggest that the chromosomal translocations occur in humans by RAG-mediated errors in DN2/DN3 cells and the resultant enforced LMO2 expression leads to inhibition in T-cell development and onset of leukemia (24). By contrast, however, Lmo2 expression early in normal T-cell development is likely to be a remnant of expression in hematopoietic precursors, as it is not required for normal lymphoid maturation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank James Cruickshank, Lynn Grift, Gareth King, Theresa Langford, Angela Middleton, Claire Pearce, and Charlotte Rickett for animal husbandry, Annette Lenton for production of the art work, and N. Lobato for commenting on the manuscript. We thank J. Roes and K. Rajewsky for the CD19-Cre-tk plasmid, X. Gu and K. Rajewsky for the Cre plasmid, and R. Perlmutter for the Lck transgenic cassette.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ß T-cell development and to rapid development of T-cell lymphomas. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4782-4791.[Abstract]
2. Boehm, T., L. Foroni, Y. Kaneko, M. P. Perutz, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1991. The rhombotin family of cysteine-rich LIM-domain oncogenes: Distinct members are involved in T-cell translocations to human chromosomes 11p15 and 11p13. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:4367-4371.
3. Collins, E. C., R. Pannell, E. M. Simpson, A. Forster, and T. H. Rabbitts. 2000. Interchromosomal recombination of Mll and. Af9 genes mediated by cre-loxP in mouse development. EMBO Rep. 1:127-132.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Feinberg, A. P., and B. A. Vogelstein. 1983. A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem. 132:6-13.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Fischer, A., and B. Malissen. 1998. Natural and engineered disorders of lymphocyte development. Science 280:237-243.
6. Fizzotti, M., E. Y. Chen, M. P. Link, A. J. Carroll, L. Foroni, T. H. Rabbitts, W. M. Crist, and S. S. Clark. 1994. Simultaneous expression of RBTN2 and BCR-ABL oncogenes in a human T-cell acute leukemia with a t(11;14)(p13;q11) and a late appearing Philadelphia chromosome. Leukaemia 8:1124-1130.[Medline]
7. Grutz, G., K. Bucher, I. Lavenir, R. Larson, T. Larson, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1998. The oncogenic T-cell LIM-protein Lmo2 forms part of a DNA-binding complex specifically in immature T cells. EMBO J. 17:4594-4605.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Hacein-Bey-Abina, S., F. Le Deist, F. Carlier, C. Bouneaud, C. Hue, J. De Villartay, A. Thrasher, N. Wulffraat, R. Sorensen, S. Dupuis-Girod, A. Fischer, E. Davies, W. Kuis, L. Leiva, and M. Cavazzana-Calvo. 2002. Sustained correction of X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency by ex vivo gene therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:1185-1193.
9. Hacein-Bey-Abina, S., C. von Kalle, M. Schmidt, F. Le Deist, N. Wulffraat, E. McIntyre, I. Radford, J. L. Villeval, C. C. Fraser, M. Cavazzana-Calvo, and A. Fischer. 2003. A serious adverse event after successful gene therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:255-256.
9. Hacein-Bey-Abina, S., C. von Kalle, M. Schmidt, M. P. McCormack, N. Wulffraat, P. Leboulch, A. Lim, C. S. Osborne, R. Pawliuk, E. Morillon, R. Sorensen, A. Forster, P. Fraser, J. I. Cohen, G. de Saint Basile, I. Alexander, U. Wintergerst, T. Frebourg, A. Aurias, D. Stoppa-Lyonnet, S. Romana, I. Radford-Weiss, F. Gross, F. Valensi, E. Delabesse, E. MacIntyre, F. Sigaux, J. Soulier, L. E. Leiva, M. Wissler, C. Prinz, T. H. Rabbitts, F. Le Deist, A. Fischer, and M. Cavazzana-Calvo. 2003. LM02-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science 302:415-419.
10. Hanahan, D., and R. A. Weinberg. 2000. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57-67.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Hardy, R. R., C. E. Carmack, S. A. Shinton, J. D. Kemp, and K. Hayakawa. 1991. Resolution and characterization of pro-B and pre-pro-B-cell stages in normal mouse bone marrow. J. Exp Med. 173:1213-1225.
12. Hardy, R. R., and K. Hayakawa. 2001. B-cell development pathways. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19:595-621.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Herblot, S., A.-M. Steff, P. Hugo, P. D. Aplan, and T. Hoang. 2000. SCL and LMO1 alter thymocyte differentiation: inhibition of E2A-HEB function and pre-T
chain expression. Nat. Immunol. 1:138-144.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Igarashi, H., S. C. Gregory, T. Yokota, N. Sakaguchi, and P. W. Kincade. 2002. Transcription from the RAG1 locus marks the earliest lymphocyte progenitors in bone marrow. Immunity 17:117-130.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Kenny, D. A., L. W. Jurata, Y. Saga, and G. N. Gill. 1998. Identification and characterization of LMO4, an LMO gene with a novel pattern of expression during embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:11257-11262.
16. Larson, R., P. Fisch, T. Larson, I. Lavenir, T. Langford, G. King, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1994. T-cell tumours with disparate phenotypes develop with long latency in mice transgenic for rbtn2. Oncogene 9:3675-3681.[Medline]
17. Larson, R. C., I. Lavenir, T. A. Larson, R. Baer, A. J. Warren, I. Wadman, K. Nottage, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1996. Protein dimerisation between Lmo2 (Rbtn2) and Tal1 alters thymocyte development and potentiates T-cell tumorigenesis in transgenic mice. EMBO J. 15:1021-1027.[Medline]
18. Larson, R. C., H. Osada, T. A. Larson, I. Lavenir, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1995. The oncogenic LIM protein Rbtn2 causes thymic developmental aberrations that precede malignancy in transgenic mice. Oncogene 11:853-862.[Medline]
19. LeFranc, M.-P., A. Forster, R. Baer, M. A. Stinson, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1986. Diversity and rearrangement of the human T-cell rearranging
genes: Nine germ-line variable genes belonging to two subgroups. Cell 45:237-246.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Look, A. T. 1997. The metabolic basis of inherited disease, p. 109-141. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
21. Mombaerts, P., J. Iancomini, R. S. Johnson, K. Herrup, S. TRonegawa, and V. E. Papaloannou. 1992. RAG-1-deficient mice have no mature B and T lymphocytes. Cell 68:869-877.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Neale, G. A., J. E. Rehg, and R. M. Goorha. 1997. Disruption of T-cell differentiation precedes T-cell tumor formation in LMO2 (rhombotin-2) transgenic mice. Leukaemia 11:289-290.
23. Neale, G. A., J. E. Rehg, and R. M. Goorha. 1995. Ectopic expression of rhombotin-2 causes selective expansion of the thymus and T-cell tumours in transgenic mice. Blood 86:3060-3071.
24. Rabbitts, T. H. 1998. LMO T-cell translocation oncogenes typify genes activated by chromosomal translocations that alter transcription and developmental processes. Genes Dev. 12:2651-2657.
25. Rickert, R. C., K. Rajewsky, and J. Roes. 1995. Impairment of T-cell-dependent B-cell responses and B-1 cell development in CD19-deficient mice. Nature. 376:352-355.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Royer-Pokora, B., U. Loos, and W.-D. Ludwig. 1991. TTG-2, a new gene encoding a cysteine-rich protein with the LIM motif, is overexpressed in acute T-cell leukaemia with the t(11;14)(p13;q11). Oncogene 6:1887-1893.[Medline]
27. Sanchez-Garcia, I., Y. Kaneko, R. Gonzalez-Sarmiento, K. Campbell, L. White, T. Boehm, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1991. A study of chromosome 11p13 translocations involving T-cell receptorß and T-cell receptor
in human T-cell leukaemia. Oncogene 6:577-582.[Medline]
28. Southern, E. M. 1975. Detection of Specific Sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol. 98:503-517.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Thomas, K. R., and M. R. Capecchi. 1987. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 51:503-512.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Torres, R. M., and R. Kuhn. 1997. Laboratory protocols for conditional gene targeting. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
31. Wadman, I. A., H. Osada, G. G. Grutz, A. D. Agulnick, H. Westphal, A. Forster, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1997. The LIM-only protein Lmo2 is a bridging molecule assembling an erythroid, DNA-binding complex which includes the TAL1, E47, GATA-1 and Ldb1/NLI proteins. EMBO J. 16:3145-3157.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Warren, A. J., W. H. Colledge, M. B. L. Carlton, M. J. Evans, A. J. H. Smith, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1994. The oncogenic cysteine-rich LIM domain protein rbtn2 is essential for erythroid development. Cell 78:45-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Wildin, R. S., H. U. Wang, K. A. Forbush, and R. M. Perlmutter. 1995. Functional dissection of the murine lck distal promoter. J. Immunol. 155:1286-1295.[Abstract]
34. Yamada, Y., R. Pannell, A. Forster, and T. H. Rabbitts. 2000. The oncogenic LIM-only transcription factor Lmo2 regulates angiogenesis but not vasculogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:320-324.
35. Yamada, Y., A. W. Warren, C. Dobson, A. Forster, R. Pannell, and T. H. Rabbitts. 1998. The T-cell leukaemia LIM protein Lmo2 is necessary for adult mouse hematopoiesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3890-3895.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|