Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2003, p. 1251-1259, Vol. 23, No. 4
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.4.1251-1259.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Linden E. Craig,2,
and Rebecca Taub1*
Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine,1 Laboratory of Pathology and Toxicology, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191042
Received 14 May 2002/ Returned for modification 20 July 2002/ Accepted 12 November 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B) and STAT3 are rapidly activated by means of posttranslational modifications in the remnant liver in response to stimuli such as epidermal growth factor, interleukin-6 (IL-6), hepatocyte growth factor, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (23, 33). Subsequently, during liver regeneration a transcriptional cascade is established that results in the entry of the hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells into the S phase of the cell cycle.
Among the liver-specific immediate-early genes rapidly induced during regenerating liver and implicated in the maintenance of hepatocyte differentiation and metabolism is that for insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) (32). As a member of a group of structurally related soluble proteins which specifically bind and modulate the bioavailability and activity of insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II), IGFBP-1 has been shown to either enhance or inhibit the mitogenic effects of IGFs in certain tissues and to play an integral role in glucoregulation by suppressing IGF activity (17). IGFBP-1 may also have IGF-independent actions mediated by its internal RGD sequence, which has been shown to bind to
5ß1 integrin (also known as the fibronectin receptor), and affect cell migration and attachment through unknown processes (17).
The role of IGFBP-1 in liver regeneration is unknown. IGFBP-1 is greatly induced at the transcriptional level in the remnant liver, with peak expression at 1 h posthepatectomy (24). Insulin, via inhibition of IGFBP-1 transcription, is a primary determinant of IGFBP-1 expression both in vitro and in vivo (17). However, IL-6 stimulation of hepatic IGFBP-1 expression can supersede the effect of insulin (18). IL-6 transcriptionally upregulates a vast array of genes and is required for normal liver regeneration and repair (4, 19). Evidence for a biologic role of IL-6 in IGFBP-1 upregulation includes increased expression of hepatic IGFBP-1 in IL-6 transgenic animals and following injection of IL-6 into nonfasting animals and its reduced expression in IL-6-/- livers posthepatectomy (18). These findings and other data which showed that hepatic IGFBP-1 mRNA and serum protein levels have a second peak of expression at 36 to 60 h posthepatectomy corresponding to the second round of mitotic activity (16) raised the possibility that IGFBP-1 may have a role in the mitogenic response in regenerating liver (28, 31). Since the level of IGFBP-1 is dynamically regulated by changes in the metabolic state and after hepatic injury, we investigated whether genetic disruption of IGFBP-1 expression could affect the normal hepatic proliferative response following a 70% hepatectomy, in which two larger lobes of the liver are removed intact without injury to remnant liver cells. We found that IGFBP-1 is required for a normal regenerative response, as IGFBP-1-/- livers have defects in the DNA response, increased necrosis, and blunting of expression of cell cycle-regulatory proteins, active mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MAPK/ERK), and C/EBPß transcription factor.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Generation of mutant mice. The targeting vector was sent to GenomeSystems for electroporation into RW4 embryonic stem (ES) cells and selection with G418. The positive clone was injected into C57BL/6J blastocysts by the Transgenic Mouse Core Facility. Chimera animals were crossed to C57BL/6J females with agouti coat color, indicating germ line transmission by one male. Heterozygous pups were identified by Southern blotting and either backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice or mated brother-sister to generate colonies (B6; 129 hybrid background). Primers IB64 (5'-TGACAATCATTAACCTGTGCCGCAC-3') and IB546 (5'-ACCTTCATGCTGGGAGCTGAACAAG-3') were used in PCR analyses to identify the IGFBP-1+/+ animals. PGKNeo (5'-TTCCATTTGTCACGTCCTGCACGAC-3') and IBKO (5'-GAAACAACTGTGGGCATTGTCACGG-3') primer pairs were used to genotype the IGFBP-1-/- animals. IB64 begins at position -64 relative to the start site, and IB546 begins at +546. Both of these regions are missing in the knockout mice. IBKO starts at -400 relative to the start site. PGKNeo is within the PGK promoter.
Partial hepatectomy and serological analyses.
For regenerative liver, 12- to 16-week old animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and subjected to midventral laparotomy with
70% liver resection (12). For IGFBP-1-treated mice, animals were injected intraperitoneally with 0.3 µg of IGFBP-1/g of body weight for the indicated times or 30 min before surgery. For bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-treated mice, animals were injected intraperitoneally with 50 mg of BrdU/kg (0.2% solution in phosphate-buffered saline) at 1 h before fixation (9). Blood was obtained at the time of killing via cannulation of the inferior vena cava; serum was collected and analyzed by Ani Lytics, Inc. (Gaithersburg, Md.).
Immunohistochemistry. Hepatocyte nuclear staining for BrdU (Roche Diagnostic Corporation/Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.), a thymidine analogue capable of incorporation into actively replicating DNA, was performed essentially as described previously (9).
Northern and Western analyses. RNA was isolated from IGFBP-1+/+ and IGFBP-1-/- livers and analyzed by Northern blotting as described previously (9). Whole-cell extracts were prepared as previously described and subjected to Western analyses (18). Primary antibodies used were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc (Santa Cruz, Calif.). Secondary antibodies were from Zymed Laboratories Inc. (South San Francisco, Calif.). The data were scanned densitometrically to quantitate mRNA and protein levels (Image-Quant Software; [Molecular Dynamics] and NIH Image 1.62). StatWorks (Apple Software, Cupertino, Calif.) and Student's t test were used for statistical analyses.
Primary hepatocyte isolation and cell culture. Primary mouse hepatocytes were isolated as described previously (15). HeLa cells were cultured in Iscove's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U of penicillin, and 50 U of streptomycin. At 24 h after seeding the cells, the cells were washed and kept in Iscove's medium containing 0.2% fetal bovine serum. After 24 h, the cells were treated with 100 ng of recombinant human IL-6 per ml or 100 ng of IGFBP-1 per ml for the indicated times.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Histopathology following two-thirds partial hepatectomy. No significant mortality and morbidity were observed in IGFBP-1-/- mice relative to IGFBP-1+/+ mice posthepatectomy. However, well-demarcated areas of liquefaction necrosis, randomly distributed and representing 5 to 10% of the liver parenchyma with necrotic hepatocytes at the periphery, were observed in IGFBP-1-/- livers at 32 and 40 h after hepatectomy (n = 7 and 9) (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2B). Little or no necrosis was seen in the >80% of IGFBP-1-/- livers harvested at 48 h and later posthepatectomy, and regenerative changes were observed, indicating that resolution can occur (Fig. 2C and D). Increased liver damage was further substantiated by a sevenfold increase in aspartate aminotransferase levels (P < 0.006) and a fivefold increase in alanine aminotransferase levels (P < 0.02) in IGFBP-1-/- serum relative to IGFBP-1+/+ livers 32 h after hepatectomy (Fig. 2E and F). Levels of glucose, amylase, creatinine, triglyceride, and cholesterol were similar in IGFBP-1+/+ and IGFBP-1-/- mice (data not shown).
|
|
Blunted induction of C/EBPß and MAPK expression posthepatectomy in IGFBP-1-/- livers restored by IGFBP-1 treatment.
Following partial hepatectomy, mice with a targeted deletion of the C/EBPß bZip transcription factor gene display impaired hepatic regeneration characterized by a blunted DNA synthetic response and delayed induction of cyclin A, B, and E expression but not of cyclin D1 expression (9). Since the patterns of cyclin dysregulation are similar in IGFBP-1-/- and C/EBPß-/- livers, we assessed the expression of C/EBPß in IGFBP-1-/- livers. A highly blunted induction in C/EBPß expression was observed in the IGFBP-1-/- livers at 1, 2, and 5 h posthepatectomy compared with controls (Fig. 4A). There was a transient twofold elevation of C/EBP
at 1 h posthepatectomy, and the decrease in p30 normally observed after partial hepatectomy (9) appeared to occur more rapidly in the IGFBP-1-/- livers. As previously observed (9), decreased C/EBPß associated with even small increases in C/EBP
may result in a significant increase in relative levels of C/EBP
and homo- and heterodimers which are known inhibitors of hepatocyte DNA synthesis.
|
IL-6 is a known activator of C/EBPß (1, 27), hepatic ERK1/2 phosphorylation (19), and STAT3 activation (4) in regenerating livers. To assess whether reduced IL-6 signaling could contribute to blunted C/EBPß and ERK1/2 activation in IGFBP-1-/- livers posthepatectomy, we used a phospho-STAT3-specific antibody in Western analyses to examine the induction pattern of STAT3. Similar degrees of STAT3 induction were observed in the wild-type and IGFBP-1-/- livers (Fig. 4A), suggesting that IL-6 signaling was not responsible for the differential kinetics of ERK1/2 and C/EBPß activation in IGFBP-1-/- livers.
To ascertain whether differences in protein expression may be explained in part by differences in gene expression, we examined C/EBBß mRNA expression. Northern analyses revealed that there is no significant difference in the expression pattern of C/EBPß mRNA in IGFBP-1-/- quiescent and 2-h-posthepatectomy livers relative to that in control livers. JunB and C/EBP
mRNA expression patterns were indistinguishable between the quiescent and 2-h-posthepatectomy IGFBP-1+/+ and IGFBP-1-/- livers (Fig. 4C). Treatment with a single dose of IGFBP-1 followed by partial hepatectomy had no effect on the mRNA expression of C/EBPß, C/EBP
, and JunB. These data suggest that the level of C/EBPß protein was regulated posttranscriptionally.
To determine if abnormal regulation of C/EBPß was intrinsic to IGFBP-1-/- hepatocytes, we examined C/EBPß protein expression in primary hepatocytes isolated from IGFBP-1+/+ and IGFBP-1-/- livers. The amount of C/EBPß protein in the IGFBP-1+/+ hepatocytes was >7-fold higher than that in the IGFBP-1-/- hepatocytes (P < 0.00001), even though the amount of p-STAT3 in the IGFBP-1-/- hepatocytes was slightly elevated compared to that in the IGFBP-1+/+ hepatocytes (Fig. 4D). On the other hand, the p42 form of C/EBP
was reduced and the less antiproliferative form p30 was relatively elevated in hepatocytes from both IGFBP-1-/- and IGFBP-1+/+ livers, perhaps as a result of relative instability in the p42 form. Levels of C/EBP
were slightly higher in IGFBP-1+/+ hepatocytes, suggesting that in this in vitro system, levels of C/EBP
were not greatly influenced by the presence of IGFBP-1.
Because the IL-6 signaling pathway is constitutively active in both IGFBP-1+/+ and IGFBP-1-/- primary hepatocytes as verified by p-STAT3 Western analyses (Fig. 4D), we employed an alternative cell type to assess whether IGFBP-1 could potentially function as a signaling molecule to activate ERK1/2. In these experiments, IL-6 was used as a positive control because it is a known activator of ERK1/2 phosphorylation (19). HeLa cells treated with IGFBP-1 for 20 min showed a level of ERK activation similar to that of cells stimulated with IL-6 (Fig. 4E). However, activation of STAT3, as shown by p-STAT3, was detected only in extracts prepared from cells treated with IL-6 and not in those from cells treated with IGFBP-1. Taken together, these findings suggested that IGFBP-1 can function upstream of the MAPK/ERK pathway. Even though HeLa cells contain IGF-I receptor (26), which upon stimulation can activate the ERK pathway (6), the studies were conducted under low-serum conditions and no exogenous IGFs were added. Rodent hepatocytes have undetectable IGF-I receptors (31, 32), and IGFs have not been shown to have a growth-regulatory role in isolated hepatocytes. Thus, the stimulatory effect of IGFBP-1 on ERK1/2 activation in regenerating liver may not be dependent on regulation of IGF activity, but this cannot be ruled out.
If the aberrant induction of C/EBPß and MAPK/ERK activation was a direct effect of IGFBP-1 deficiency in the IGFBP-1-/- mice, then treating IGFBP-1-/- mice with IGFBP-1 should restore the level of C/EBPß and the level of ERK1/2 induction to near normal. IGFBP-1 treatment led to a level of ERK1/2 activation similar to that seen in IGFBP-1+/+ livers at 30 min posthepatectomy (Fig. 4F). A single preoperative dose of IGFBP-1 returned ERK1/2 activation to near normal following a two-thirds partial hepatectomy. IGFBP-1 treatment was also sufficient to restore C/EBPß induction. The absolute level of IGFBP-1 achieved in the IGFBP-1-/- livers by injection was significantly less than in wild-type posthepatectomized controls (Fig. 4D). A single preoperative dose of IGFBP-1 was not sufficient to correct the DNA synthetic defect in IGFBP-1-/- livers following 70% partial hepatectomy, suggesting that a more sustained presence of IGFBP-1 may be required to correct the regenerative defect.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
and ß) are leucine-zipper transcription factors that are highly expressed in quiescent livers and are able to heterodimerize with other C/EBP proteins (32). C/EBP
plays a role in specifying mitotic growth arrest, terminal differentiation, or both (37), whereas C/EBPß expression is required but not sufficient to stimulate cell proliferation (3). Following a two-thirds hepatectomy, an inverse regulation of the C/EBP
and -ß proteins results in at least a sevenfold increase in the ß-to-
DNA binding ratio between 3 and 24 h posthepatectomy (8, 32), indicating that a coordinated temporal cascade of C/EBP
and -ß expression may regulate the balance between cell proliferation and maturational phases of the liver. In hepatectomized IGFBP-1-/- livers, whereas early induction of C/EBPß did not occur, levels of C/EBP
at the corresponding times were normal or slightly higher (1 h posthepatectomy), suggesting that the
/ß ratio was also abnormal. Thus, as in C/EBP-/- livers, the relative elevation of the
/ß ratio is likely to contribute to the impaired entry into S phase. Even though IL-6 has been implicated in playing a role in activating C/EBPß (1), normal induction of immediate-early genes linked to the IL-6/STAT3 activation pathway in the C/EBPß-/- livers posthepatectomy suggests that C/EBPß regulation is independent of the IL-6 pathway (9). This finding is further supported by data that showed normal induction of C/EBPß expression in IL-6-/- livers following partial hepatectomy (4). In contrast, there was a reduced induction of C/EBPß protein expression following partial hepatectomy in the IGFBP-1-/- livers, which was corrected with IGFBP-1 treatment. The involvement of IGFBP-1 as a regulator of C/EBPß protein levels was further indicated by the finding of a greater-than-sevenfold decrease in C/EBPß expression in IGFBP-1-/- primary hepatocytes. Like for C/EBPß-/- livers (9), no differences were detected in IL-6 responsive pathways, such as STAT3 activation, and expression of STAT3-responsive genes, such as those for JunB and cyclin D1, in IGFBP-1-/- livers following partial hepatectomy.
Unlike most of the reports which emphasize the establishment of a transcriptional cascade as a means to regulate target gene expression following two-thirds partial hepatectomy, our study suggests that IGFBP-1 functions to help stabilize the C/EBPß protein and to activate ERK1/2 expression by posttranslational modification (Fig. 5). Normal induction of C/EBPß mRNA and ERK1/2 protein expression were observed in the IGFBP-1-deficient livers posthepatectomy. Based on our results, treatment of IGFBP-1-/- mice with IGFBP-1 increased the total (phosphorylation state-independent) C/EBPß protein level in the liver to normal. However, full restoration of ERK1/2 activation occurred only in posthepatectomized IGFBP-1 treated IGFBP-1-/- livers, suggesting that IGFBP-1 cooperates with other hepatectomy-induced growth factors or cytokines to posttranslationally modify MAPK. For instance, activation of ERK1 (p44 MAPK) precedes ERK2 (p42 MAPK) phosphorylation in IL-6-/- livers pretreated with IL-6 (19). However, IGFBP-1 treatment alone led to elevation of the p42 MAPK level in IGFBP-1-/- livers. Since IGFBP-1 mRNA and protein expression are rapidly induced 1 h after IL-6 treatment (18), it is conceivable that IGFBP-1 cooperates with IL-6 or other IL-6 induced growth factors to elicit the activation of ERK1/2 during liver regeneration.
The underlying mechanism leading to the stabilization of C/EBPß by IGFBP-1 during liver regeneration awaits further elucidation. It is known that in aplysia, phosphorylation by MAPK is required for aplysia CCAAT/enhancer binding protein to act as a transcription activator and to prevent aplysia CCAAT/enhancer binding protein from being degraded through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (39). Similarly, inhibition of the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway can lead to the upregulation of Gadd153 and ATF3, both of which belong to the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) family (40).
Our report showed that an appropriate level of IGFBP-1 is critical for proper control of the hepatocyte cell cycle. It is also the first report to show that a member of the IGFBP family may regulate mitogenic signaling by activating MAPK and C/EBPß protein levels in vivo. Presently it is not clear if regulation of hepatocyte proliferation by IGFBP-1 is mediated via IGF-dependent or -independent mechanisms. However, it should be noted that IGF-I receptors are expressed at a very low level in hepatocytes, and IGF-I has not been shown to be a hepatocyte mitogen in vitro (24). Moreover, in human hepatoma cell lines, dephosphorylated IGFBP-1 may be mitogenic independent of IGF-I (13, 17). Human conditions in which elevations of IGFBP-1 expression are observed include cirrhosis, in which some degree of liver regeneration may occur (17), and human hepatocellular carcinomas, in which IGFBP-1 has been detected as a highly expressed gene (14). Overexpression of IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor in transgenic mice causes massive elevation of IGFBP-1 and the early development of hepatocellular hyperplastic lesions and late formation of liver adenomas (22). These data provide initial insight into a potential role for IGFBP-1 in stimulating growth of the liver in human clinical conditions and malignant transformation.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported in part by Digestive and Liver Center grant P30 DK50306 (technical support) and grants NIH DK 58315 and DK 49629 (to R.T.).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address: Bristol Myers Squibb, Wilmington, DE 19880-0400. ![]()
Present address: Department of Pathobiology, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine, Knoxville, TN 37996-4500. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Albrecht, J. H., R. Y. Poon, C. L. Ahonen, B. M. Rieland, C. Deng, and G. S. Crary. 1998. Involvement of p21 and p27 in the regulation of CDK activity and cell cycle progression in the regenerating liver. Oncogene 16:2141-2150.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Buck, M., V. Poli, T. Hunter, and M. Chojkier. 2001. C/EBPß phosphorylation by RSK creates functional XEXD caspase inhibitory box critical for cell survival. Mol. Cell 8:807-816.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Cressman, D. E., L. E. Greenbaum, R. A. DeAngelis, G. Ciliberto, E. E. Furth, V. Poli, and R. Taub. 1996. Liver failure and defective hepatocyte regeneration in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Science 22:1379-1383.
5. Crissey, M. A,. J. I. Leu, R. A. De Angelis, L. E. Greenbaum, L. M. Scearce, K. Kovalovich, and R. Taub. 1999. Liver specific and proliferation-induced deoxyribonuclease I hypersensitive sites in the mouse insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 gene. Hepatology 30:1187-1197.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Dews, M., M. Prisco, F. Peruzzi, G. Romano, A. Morrione, and R. Baserga. 2000. Domains of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor required for the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases. Endocrinology 141:1289-1300.
7. Factor, V. M., and S. S. Thorgeirsson. 1997. Coexpression of c-myc and transforming growth factor alpha in the liver promotes early replicative senescence and diminishes regenerative capacity after partial hepatectomy in transgenic mice. Hepatology 26:1434-1443.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Greenbaum, L. E., D. E. Cressman, B. A. Haber, and R. Taub. 1995. Coexistence of C/EBP
, ß, growth-induced proteins and DNA synthesis in hepatocytes during liver regeneration. J. Clin. Investig. 96:1351-1365.
9. Greenbaum, L. E., W. Li, D. E. Cressman, Y. Peng, G. Ciliberto, V. Poli, and R. Taub. 1998. CCAAT enhancer binding protein ß is required for normal hepatocyte proliferation in mice after partial hepatectomy. J. Clin. Investig. 102:996-1007.[Medline]
10. Haber, B., L. Naji, D. Cressman, and R. Taub. 1995. Coexpression of liver-specific and growth-induced genes in perinatal and regenerating liver: attainment and maintenance of the differentiated state during rapid proliferation. Hepatology 22:906-914.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Hengelin, B., and C. Brechot. 1992. Cyclin A is required in S phase in normal epithelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 182:1144-1154.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Higgins, G. M., and R. M. Anderson. 1931. Restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch. Pathol. 12:656-665.
13. Kim, D.-G., D. Lee, C. Baik-Hwan, Y. Kyung-Ran, and K. Mi-Young. 1999. Down regulation of insulin-like growth factor binding proteins and growth modulation in hepatoma cells by retinoic acid. Hepatology 29:1091-1098.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Kondoh, N., T. Wakasuki, A. Ryo., A. Hada, T. Aihara, S. Horiuchi, N. Goseki, O. Atsubara, K. Takenaka, M. Shichita, K. Tanaka, M. Shuda, and M. Yamamoto. 1999. Identification and characterization of genes associated with human hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 59:4990-4996.
15. Kovalovich, K., W. Li, R. DeAngelis, L. E. Greenbaum, G. Ciliberto, and R. Taub. 2001. Interleukin-6 protects against Fas-mediated death by establishing a critical level of anti-apoptotic hepatic proteins FLIP, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL. J. Biol. Chem. 276:26605-26613.
16. Lee, J., L. Greenbaum, B. A. Haber, D. Nagle, V. Lee, V. Miles, K. L. Mohn, M. Bucan, and R. Taub. 1994. Structure and localization of the IGFBP-1 gene and its expression during liver regeneration. Hepatology 19:656-665.[Medline]
17. Lee, P. D. K., L. C. Giudice, C. A. Conover, and D. R. Powell. 1997. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1: recent findings and new directions. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 216:319-357.[Abstract]
18. Leu, J. I., M. S. Crissey, J. P. Leu, G. Ciliberto, and R. Taub. 2001. Interleukin-6-induced STAT3 and AP-1 amplify hepatocyte nuclear factor-1-mediated transactivation of hepatic genes, an adaptive response to liver injury. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:414-424.
19. Li, W., X. Liang, J. I. Leu, K. Kovalovich, G. Ciliberto, and R. Taub. 2001. Global changes in interleukin-6-dependent gene expression patterns in mouse livers after partial hepatectomy. Hepatology 33:1377-1386.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Li, W., X. Liang, C. Kellendonk, V. Poli, and R. Taub. 2002. STAT3 contributes to the mitogenic response of hepatocytes during liver regeneration. J. Biol. Chem. 277:28411-28417.
21. Loyer, P., S. Cariou, D. Glais, M. Bilodeau, G. Baffet, and C. Guguen-Guillouzo. 1996. Growth factor dependence of progression through G1 and S phases of adult rat hepatocytes in vitro. Evidence of a mitogen restriction point in mid-late G1. J. Biol. Chem. 271:11484-11492.
22. Maione, D., E. Di Carlo, W. Li, P. Musiani, A. Modesti, M. Peters, S. Rose-John, C. Della Rocca, M. Tripodi, D. Lazzaro, R. Taub, R. Savino, and G. Ciliberto. 1998. Coexpression of IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor causes nodular regenerative hyperplasia and adenomas of the liver. EMBO J. 17:5588-5597.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Michalopoulos, G. K., and M. C. DeFrances 1997. Liver regeneration. Science 276:60-66.
24. Mohn, K. L., A. E. Melby, D. S. Tewari, T. M. Laz, and R. Taub. 1991. The gene encoding rat insulin like growth factor binding protein 1 is rapidly and highly induced in regenerating liver. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:1393-1401.
25. Murphy, L. J. 2000. Overexpression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in transgenic mice. Pediatr. Nephrol. 14:567-571.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Nakamura, K., A. Hongo, J. Kodama, Y. Miyagi, M. Yoshinouchi, and T. Kudo. 2000. Down-regulation of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor by antisense RNA can reverse the transformed phenotype of human cervical cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 60:760-765.
27. Poli, V., F. P. Mancini, and R. Cortese. 1990. IL-6DBP, a nuclear protein involved in interleukin-6-signal transduction defines a new family of leucine zipper proteins related to C/EBP. Cell 63:643-653.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Scearce, L. M., T. M. Laz, T. G. Hazel, L. F. Lau, and R. Taub. 1996. Rapid activation of latent transcription factor complexes reflects initiating signals in liver regeneration. Death Differ. 3:47-55.
29. Spector, M. S., K. L. Auer, W. D. Jarvis, E. J. Ishac, B. Gao, G. Kunos, and P. Dent. 1997. Differential regulation of the mitogen-activated protein and stress activated protein kinase cascades by adrenergic agonists in quiescent and regenerating adult rat hepatocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:3556-3565.[Abstract]
30. Talarmin, H,. C. Rescan, S. Cariou, D. Glaise, G. Zanninelli, M. Bilodeau, P. Loyer, C. Guguen-Guillouzo, and G. Baffet. 1999. The mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade activation is a key signaling pathway involved in the regulation of G1 phase progression in proliferating hepatocytes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:6003-6011.
31. Taub, R. 1995. Expression and function of growth induced genes during liver regeneration, p. 71-97. In R. L. Jirtle (ed.), Liver Regenation and Carcinogenesis. Academic Press, Inc., N.Y.
32. Taub, R. 1996. Liver regeneration 4: transcriptional control of liver regeneration. FASEB J. 10:413-427.[Abstract]
33. Taub, R., L. E. Greenbaum, and Y. Peng. 1999. Transcriptional regulatory signals define cytokine-dependent and independent pathways in liver regeneration. Semin. Liver Dis. 19:117-127.[Medline]
34. Trembley, J. H., J. O. Ebbert, B. T. Kren., and C. J. Steer. 1996. Differential regulation of cyclin B1 RNA and protein expression during hepatocyte growth in vivo. Cell Growth Differ. 7:903-916.[Abstract]
35. Trembley, J. H., B. T. Kren, and C. J. Steer. 1994. Posttranscriptional regulation of cyclin B messenger RNA expression in the regenerating rat liver. Cell Growth Differ. 5:99-108.[Abstract]
36. Tybulewicz, V. L., C. E. Crawford, P. K. Jackson, R. T. Bronson, and R. C. Mulligan. 1991. Neonatal lethality and lymphopenia in mice with a homozygous disruption of the c-abl proto-oncogene. Cell 65:1153-1163.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Wang, N. D., M. J. Finegold, A. Bradley, C. N. Ou, S. V. Abdelsayed, M. D. Wilde, L. R. Taylor, D. R. Wilson, and G. J. Darlington. 1995. Impaired energy homeostasis in C/EBP alpha knockout mice. Science 269:1108-1112.
38. Yamada, Y., I. Kirillova., J. J. Peschon, and N. Fausto. 1997. Initiation of liver growth by tumor necrosis factor: defective liver regeneration in mice lacking type I tumor necrosis factor receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:1441-1446.
39. Yamamoto, N., A. N. Hegde, D. G. Chain, and J. H. Schwartz. 1999. Activation and degradation of the transcription factor C/EBP during long-term facilitation in aplysia. J. Neurochem. 73:2415-2423.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Zimmermann, J., D. Erdmann, I. Lalande, R. Grossenbacher, M. Noorani, and P. Furst. 2000. Proteasome inhibitor induced gene expression profiles reveal overexpression of transcriptional regulators ATF3, GADD153 and MAD1. Oncogene 19:2913-2920.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|