Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2003, p. 1260-1268, Vol. 23, No. 4
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.4.1260-1268.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Inactivation of the Nuclear Receptor Coactivator RAP250 in Mice Results in Placental Vascular Dysfunction
Per Antonson,1* Gertrud U. Schuster,1 Ling Wang,2 Björn Rozell,3 Elin Holter,1 Per Flodby,2 Eckardt Treuter,1 Lars Holmgren,4 and Jan-Åke Gustafsson1,2
Department of Biosciences at Novum, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, S-14157 Huddinge,1
Department of Medical Nutrition,2
Clinical Research Center and Division of Pathology, IMPI, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, S-14186 Huddinge,3
Department of Oncology, Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Hospital, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden4
Received 1 July 2002/
Returned for modification 19 September 2002/
Accepted 18 November 2002

ABSTRACT
Coactivators constitute a diverse group of proteins that are
essential for optimal transcriptional activity of nuclear receptors.
In the past few years many coactivators have been identified
but it is still unclear whether these proteins interact indiscriminately
with all nuclear receptors and whether there is some redundancy
in their functions. We have previously cloned and characterized
RAP250 (ASC-2/PRIP/TRBP/NRC), an LXXLL-containing coactivator
for nuclear receptors. In order to study its biological role,
Rap250 null mice were generated by gene targeting. Here we show
that genetic disruption of
Rap250 results in embryonic lethality
at embryonic day (E) 13.5. Histological examination of placentas
revealed a dramatically reduced spongiotrophoblast layer, a
collapse of blood vessels in the region bordering the spongiotrophoblast,
and labyrinthine layers in placentas from
Rap250-/- embryos.
These findings suggest that the lethality of
Rap250-/- embryos
is the result of obstructed placental blood circulation. Moreover,
the transcriptional activity of PPAR

is reduced in fibroblasts
derived from
Rap250-/- embryos, suggesting that RAP250 is an
essential coactivator for this nuclear receptor in the placenta.
Our results demonstrate that RAP250 is necessary for placental
development and thus essential for embryonic development.

INTRODUCTION
Nuclear receptors comprise a family of transcription factors
that regulate gene expression in a ligand-dependent manner.
Upon ligand binding these proteins activate transcription of
specific genes involved in the control of diverse physiological
processes, such as cellular growth, development, differentiation,
and homeostasis (
20). Binding of ligands to the ligand-binding
domain of nuclear receptors causes conformational changes of
the receptor, enabling the recruitment of coactivators harboring
LXXLL motifs (see below). A number of coactivators for nuclear
receptors have been identified (for a review, see reference
6). Among the most studied is the steroid receptor coactivator
1 (SRC-1) family, which contains three related coactivators,
referred to as SRC-1, SRC-2/GRIP1/TIF2, and SRC-3/p/CIP/RAC3/ACTR/AIB1/TRAM1
(
1,
4,
7,
17,
23,
28,
30,
33). These factors, together with
CBP/p300 and pCAF, bind nuclear receptors and gain access to
target promoter regions through histone acetyltransferase-mediated
nucleosome remodeling. Another class of coactivators is represented
by the TRAP/DRIP/ARC multiprotein complex (
5,
22,
26), with
one major nuclear receptor interacting subunit, PBP/TRAP220/DRIP205
(
25,
31,
41,
45), that appears to act independently of histone
acetyltransferase activity.
Nuclear receptor-activating protein 250 (RAP250) (3), also called ASC-2, PRIP, TRBP, and NRC (13, 15, 19, 42), was recently cloned and described as a novel nuclear receptor coactivator which interacts with the ligand-binding domain of ligand-bound nuclear receptors. The interaction is mediated through a short hydrophobic motif called the LXXLL motif (or NR box) which is found in most nuclear receptor coactivators. In contrast to other nuclear receptor coactivators, RAP250 only uses one LXXLL motif when interacting with nuclear receptors. A second LXXLL motif is located in the C-terminal part of the protein, but it appears to be specific for interactions with the liver X receptor ß (16). RAP250 has a unique structure and does not belong to a previously defined coactivator family. In addition, no known homologous genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Drosophila melanogaster have yet been reported. RAP250 is expressed in many tissues, and high levels of RAP250 mRNA have been detected in reproductive organs, brains, hearts, and blood (3, 13, 42). During development, RAP250 is widely expressed, with high levels of mRNA in placenta and various parts of the brain (3). The RAP250 gene is also amplified in human breast, colon, and lung cancers (15). The mechanism by which RAP250 activates transcription is not fully understood; however, the protein has an intrinsic activation domain that is likely to contribute to transcriptional activation but does not contain any histone acetyltransferase activity (3, 16, 19). Recently, three different proteins containing RNA-binding domains, termed PIMT, CoAA, and CAPER, were shown to bind to and increase the activity of RAP250 (10, 11, 43), and a role for RAP250 as a link between CBP/p300 and TRAP/DRIP/ARC coactivator complexes has been proposed (21).
The use of knockout technology has helped to elucidate the physiological function of several nuclear receptor coactivators. Mice deficient in SRC-1 are viable and show only minor resistance to steroids and thyroid hormones, indicating redundancy in coactivator functions (24, 35, 38). SRC-3 knockout mice are also viable but show growth retardation and reduced female reproductive function (34, 37). Both Cbp and p300 null mutant mice die in utero, and mice heterozygous for either of these genes have severe abnormalities (29, 40). An embryonically lethal phenotype, resulting from defects in the heart and placenta, was observed when the nuclear receptor interacting component of the TRAP/DRIP/ARC complex was disrupted (9, 44).
To investigate the biological role of RAP250 in vivo, we generated mice lacking Rap250. In this report, we show that RAP250 is required for embryonic development, as disruption of the Rap250 gene in mice results in vascular dysfunction of the placenta and embryonic lethality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Construction of RAP250 targeting vector.
To isolate the mouse
Rap250 gene, a 129/SvJ genomic phage library
(Stratagene) was screened with a mouse
Rap250 cDNA probe (
EcoRI
fragment from pGAD-RAP250 [
3]). One of the isolated clones,
clone 4, contained an 18-kb genomic region including five exons
of the murine
Rap250 locus. To construct a targeting vector,
a 7-kb
BamHI fragment including exons 5 to 7 was subcloned into
the plasmid pBluescript KS+ (Stratagene). The TK gene was then
subcloned into the
SalI site of this plasmid, generating the
plasmid p4B1-TK. In a second plasmid, a 7-kb
HindIII fragment
including exons 8 and 9 was subcloned. The generated plasmid
was cut with
SalI and
XbaI and the
neo gene was inserted at
those sites. In the next step, this plasmid was cut with
KpnI
(partial digestion) and a
KpnI fragment from p4B1-TK was subcloned
into this site, which generated the targeting vector. In the
targeting vector, exons 7 and 8 are replaced with the
neo gene
and the
neo gene is flanked by a 5-kb homologous region on each
side. The TK gene is located at the 5' end of the insert (see
Fig.
1A for maps).
Generation of RAP250 knockout mice.
RW4 embryonic stem (ES) cells were electroporated with the linearized
targeting vector and selected with G418 and ganciclovir on embryonic
fibroblast feeder cells. Resistant clones were analyzed by Southern
blotting after
BamHI digestion by use of a 3' external probe
as illustrated in Fig.
1A. Two ES cell lines exhibiting homologous
recombination were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts that were
implanted into pseudopregnant females. Chimeric male mice were
bred to C57BL/6 females and germ line transmission of the targeted
allele was examined in the agouti offspring by Southern blot
and PCR analysis. The mice and embryos analyzed are of a mixed
129SvJ-C57BL/6 genetic background. All animal experimentation
was conducted in accordance with accepted standards of humane
animal care.
Genotyping of mice and embryos.
DNA from embryo tail tips and yolk sacs was genotyped by PCR amplification using primers L8 (5'-TTCCTACTCATGCCCACAT-3') and U6 (5'-ATTCCCCTCAGTATGCTAGA-3'), which detect intron 7 of the wild-type allele, whereas primers L3 (5'-AGCAGTCTAGTTAGTAGACA-3') from intron 8 and KOF1 (5'-TAGGTCTCTTAAGCAGAGGTACCGG-3') overlapping the neomycin cassette were used to detect the targeted allele. Southern blot analysis of BamHI-digested genomic DNA using a 3' external probe (HindIII/SacI fragment from exon 9 and downstream sequence) was done to confirm PCR genotyping results.
Histology, immunohistochemistry, and TUNEL assay.
Placentas and embryos were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 14 h, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Serial sections were cut to 4 µm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin or periodic acid-Schiff stain (PAS) for microscopic examination. For immunohistochemistry, deparaffinized and rehydrated sections were pretreated with 0.3% H2O2 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 15 min and then washed in PBS. The sections were blocked for 30 min in 5% horse serum in PBS and then incubated with anti-von Willebrand polyclonal antibody (Dako) diluted 1:500 or anti-prolactin (C-17) polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1:2,000 in 5% horse serum in PBS for analysis of placenta or with anti-MAP-2B (Becton Dickinson) for analysis of embryo. Antibody binding was detected by sequential incubation of the sections with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit serum or anti-mouse serum and streptavidin-peroxidase complex (Vector). Positive staining was detected by a substrate reaction with diaminobenzidine. Sections were counterstained with Gill's hematoxylin and mounted in Permount (Fisher). To detect DNA fragmentation in situ, sections were analyzed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) method using an in situ Cell Death Detection kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Isolation of fibroblasts from embryos, RT-PCR, Western blot analysis, and transient transfections.
Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were isolated from E13.5 embryos. After removal of the head and inner organs and digestion with collagenase, the cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's high-glucose medium with 10% fetal calf serum and sodium pyruvate. Total RNA was prepared by using a kit (Qiagen). Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR was carried out using poly(dT) as a primer for cDNA synthesis and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies). The PCR primers used to detect Rap250 expression were ex5F (5'-TCTCCAGGTCGGAATCCTAT) and ex7R (5'-TTTGTCGACTGGACGATTATCTGGGGTGT). Preparation of nuclear extracts and Western blot analysis were performed as described previously (3). The rabbit anti-RAP250 antibody was derived against amino acids 818 to 931 of human RAP250 fused to glutathione S-transferase. Transient transfections were done with Lipofectin (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions using the following plasmids: pUAS-tk-Luc, pGAL4-PPAR
, pGAL4-RXR
(3), pGAL4-EERß (generous gift from S. Sanyal), and pCMVß (Clontech). Cell extracts were prepared 24 h after transfection and assayed for luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities.

RESULTS
Targeted disruption of Rap250 gene in mice.
To investigate the biological role of RAP250 in vivo, we used
homologous recombination in ES cells for the generation of mice
in which the
Rap250 gene was disrupted. Genomic mouse
Rap250 clones were isolated from libraries using a cDNA probe. To understand
the genomic organization of the gene, one of the isolated clones
was sequenced, and the corresponding intron-exon structure for
that part of the gene was determined (Fig.
1A). RAP250 contains
one functional NR box and an intrinsic transactivation domain
that are considered necessary for enhancement of transcription
activation by nuclear receptors. Therefore, we expected that
removal of these regions of the
Rap250 gene would eliminate
the function of RAP250 as a nuclear receptor coactivator. These
two functional domains were localized to exon 7. The targeting
vector was designed to delete exons 7 and 8, including the region
encoding amino acids 563 to 975 of RAP250, and to replace this
region with the neomycin gene (Fig.
1A). ES cells were electroporated
with targeting vectors and subjected to positive and negative
selection. Ganciclovir- and G418-resistant clones were isolated
and analyzed for homologous recombination by Southern blot analysis
using both internal and 3'-flanking probes (Fig.
1B). Two of
these targeted ES cell lines, 1B8 and 2D2, were injected into
C57BL/6 blastocysts to produce chimeric mice. Both clones contributed
to the germ line.
Disruption of the Rap250 gene results in embryonic lethality.
Mice heterozygous for the Rap250 mutation were viable and fertile and appeared phenotypically indistinguishable from their wild-type littermates. Genotype analysis (Fig. 1C and D) of progenies obtained from crosses between F1 Rap250+/- mice revealed that 39% were wild type and 61% were heterozygous, whereas no homozygous mutated mice were born (Table 1). To determine the time point of embryonic lethality, heterozygous females from timed matings with heterozygous males were sacrificed at various days postconception, and the genotype of the embryos was analyzed (Table 1). No homozygous mutant embryos remained alive, except for two which were severely growth retarded, at E14.5 or later. At E13.5 Rap250-/- embryos showed no gross abnormalities or great differences in size compared to their wild-type littermates (Fig. 1E). To verify that the Rap250 gene was not expressed in mutant embryos we used RT-PCR on RNA extracted from fibroblasts derived from Rap250-/- embryos. Rap250 mRNA was present in fibroblasts derived from wild-type embryos but not from Rap250-/- embryos (Fig. 2A). This result was further confirmed by Western blot analysis of nuclear extracts from MEFs (Fig. 2B).
Developmental defects in placentas of Rap250-/- mice.
Histological analysis of placentas from
Rap250 null embryos
at E13.5 revealed that the overall structure was disorganized
(Fig.
3A and B). In wild-type placentas, the labyrinthine layer,
spongiotrophoblast layer, and giant cell layer are localized
in distinct layers (Fig.
3A, C, and D). However, the spongiotrophoblast
layer in
Rap250 null placentas is markedly reduced and the labyrinthine
layer contains areas of spongiotrophoblast-like cells (Fig.
3B, E, and F). In addition, the labyrinthine layer of
Rap250-/- placentas is less vascularized than that of wild-type placentas,
and an area with necrosis at the maternal-embryonal interface
was observed. Placentas from
Rap250-/- embryos at E12.5 did
not show any signs of necrosis. Sections of placenta stained
with PAS, which stains glycogen-containing cells, showed that
the spongiotrophoblast layer of
Rap250 null placentas is markedly
reduced at both E13.5 (Fig.
4A to D) and E12.5 (Fig.
4E to H).
We also observed that the labyrinthine layer of
Rap250-/- placentas
contained islands of spongiotrophoblast-like cells that were
not detected in the wild type. We next visualized spongiotrophoblast
and giant cells in placentas with an anti-prolactin antibody
that recognizes prolactin and prolactin-related proteins. As
shown in Fig.
5, placentas from
Rap250-/- embryos showed much
less staining both at E13.5 and E12.5. The reduced staining
is mainly due to the reduced number of spongiotrophoblast cells
because the number of giant cells was approximately the same
in placentas from wild-type and
Rap250-/- embryos. These results
suggest a progressive developmental defect in
Rap250 null embryos.
Vascular defects in placentas of Rap250-/- mice.
The necrotic area detected in
Rap250 null placentas at E13.5
(Fig.
3) suggested the presence of vascular alterations and
we next visualized endothelial cells of the placentas by use
of antibodies against von Willebrand's factor. We observed that
blood vessels in the region bordering the spongiotrophoblast
and labyrinthine layers had collapsed in
Rap250-/- placentas
(Fig.
6, compare panels A and C with panels E and G). The collapse
of blood vessels is restricted to the vessels at the border
of the spongiotrophoblast and labyrinthine domains of the placenta,
as the morphology of vessels of the maternal decidua and labyrinthine
layer appeared normal. The region in proximity of the collapsed
vessels showed signs of necrosis. We therefore analyzed the
placental sections for DNA degradation using the TUNEL technique.
The areas close to the collapsed vessels of the
Rap250-/- placentas
were positive for TUNEL staining, displaying a staining pattern
characteristic of necrotic tissue, thus confirming that these
areas were necrotic (Fig.
6B and D). However, no DNA degradation
was apparent in null placentas at E12.5 (data not shown), and
the corresponding tissue of
Rap250+/- placentas did not show
any signs of DNA degradation (Fig.
6F and H). The severe defects
detected in the blood vessels bordering the labyrinth and spongiotrophoblast
layers of knockout mouse placentas suggest that blood circulation
was obstructed, resulting in local necrosis. We argue that these
vascular defects cause placental ischemia and subsequent embryonic
death.
Deficiency in heart and neural development in Rap250-/- mice.
Examination of hematoxylin- and eosin-stained sagittal sections
of
Rap250-/- embryos revealed no gross developmental defects.
However, myocardial walls of both atriums and ventricles of
Rap250-/- embryos were thinner than those of wild-type embryos
at E13.5 (Fig.
7A and B). At a higher magnification,
Rap250-/- embryos showed hypoplasia of ventricular walls and the trabecular
zone (Fig.
7C and D). Histological examination of the E13.5
embryos showed retarded development in most areas of the brain.
The neopallial cortex was significantly thinner in
Rap250-/- embryos than in wild-type littermates (Fig.
8A and B). Immunohistological
staining with anti-MAP2B monoclonal antibody, an antibody against
differentiated neurons, indicated a reduced number of differentiated
neurons in the neopallial cortex in
Rap250-/- embryos (Fig.
8C and D). The olfactory lobes, which can be easily distinguished
in wild-type embryos at this stage, were not seen in
Rap250-/- mice (Fig.
8E and F). Differentiation and enlargement of the
thalamus and hypothalamus regions of
Rap250-/- embryos were
not as well developed as in wild-type littermates, and the volume
of the third ventricle was correspondingly enlarged in the mutant
embryos (Fig.
8E and F). These morphological findings suggest
that neuroepithelial cells of the
Rap250-/- embryos are defective
in cell proliferation.
Transcriptional activities of PPAR
are impaired in Rap250-/- MEFs.
In order to investigate the role of RAP250 in regulating the
activity of nuclear receptors important for placental development,
we isolated fibroblasts from wild-type and
Rap250-/- embryos
and analyzed transcriptional activities using transient transfections.
Plasmids containing the PPAR

, EERß, and RXR

ligand-binding
domains fused to the GAL4 DNA binding domain were cotransfected
with a GAL4 responsive reporter gene into MEFs, whereupon these
cells were cultured in the presence or absence of ligand. PPAR
and RXR

showed ligand-dependent transcriptional activity in
both wild-type and
Rap250-/- cells. However, the activity of
PPAR

was markedly reduced in
Rap250-/- cells, by 50% compared
to wild-type cells (Fig.
9). The activity of RXR

was not significantly
changed, whereas ERRß had no activity compared to
that of the GAL4 DNA binding domain alone. These results suggest
that RAP250 is necessary for optimal function of PPAR

.

DISCUSSION
Previous results suggest an important role for RAP250 as a coactivator
for several nuclear receptors (
3,
13,
15,
19,
42). In this report,
we provide genetic evidence that RAP250 is required for embryonic
development. Embryos lacking this coactivator die around E13.5
and our results indicate that the embryonic lethality is most
likely due to placental dysfunction, since morphological examination
of placentas from
Rap250-/- embryos revealed severe developmental
and vascular defects. We found that the spongiotrophoblast layer
was markedly reduced and that maternal blood vessels bordering
the spongiotrophoblast and labyrinthine layers had collapsed
at E13.5 in
Rap250 null placentas. In addition, a necrotic area
was found in proximity to the collapsed blood vessels. These
findings suggest that blood circulation has been obstructed
in placentas from
Rap250-/- embryos, leading to placental ischemia
followed by embryonic death. Interestingly, the collapse of
blood vessels is specific for those vessels found at the border
of the spongiotrophoblast and labyrinthine layers, since normal
blood vessels were found outside this region. The mechanism
that causes the collapse of blood vessels bordering the spongiotrophoblast
and labyrinthine layers in placentas from
Rap250-/- embryos
is unclear. One explanation could be a lack of local production
of factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor, needed
for proper blood vessel function. This explanation is supported
by our finding that the spongiotrophoblast layer, which is known
to have endocrine functions, is markedly reduced in placentas
from
Rap250-/- embryos as early as E12.5.
The severe morphological changes we observed in placentas from Rap250-/- embryos affected both the labyrinth and spongiotrophoblast layers, suggesting that RAP250 is involved in multiple signaling pathways in the placenta. The striking reduction of the spongiotrophoblast layer is similar to what was found in the null mutation of nuclear receptor ERR-ß in mice. ERR-ß plays an important role in trophoblast differentiation and the null mutation results in embryonic lethality at E10.5 (18). The labyrinthine layer was also less vascularized in placentas from Rap250-/- embryos than in the wild type. This abnormality might reflect impaired function of the nuclear receptor PPAR
since genetic studies have shown that this receptor and its dimerization partner RXR are essential for placental development and vasculature (2, 14, 27, 36). It is also interesting that the nuclear receptor coactivator TRAP220, which is a coactivator for PPAR
, also has an essential role in the labyrinthine layer (44). RAP250 is a coactivator for PPAR
(3, 16, 42) in vitro and our transfection studies with cultured MEFs derived from Rap250-/- embryos further indicate that RAP250 is a coactivator for PPAR
in vivo since the activity of the PPAR
AF2 function was only 50% in Rap250-/- MEFs compared to wild-type cells. Examination of Rap250-/- embryos revealed that hearts had thin cardiac ventricular walls and trabecular hypoplasia. This heart phenotype is comparable to that described for PPAR
-/-, RXR
-/-, and TRAP220-/- embryos (2, 9, 12), and the severity of these defects suggests that they might contribute to the lethality of mutant embryos. The existence of a placenta-heart axis has been demonstrated (2), and therefore it is likely that the compromised heart development observed in Rap250-/- embryos is a result of placental dysfunction. In addition, the central nervous system was generally underdeveloped at E13.5; however, whether the observed defects in the central nervous system are primary or secondary to those in the placenta is unclear.
Our observation that Rap250-/- embryos die rather late during development suggests a selective role for RAP250 in the regulation of transcription which is in contrast to the function of the more general coactivators CBP, p300, and the mammalian mediator. Targeted disruption of SRB7, a component of the mammalian mediator complex, showed that this factor is essential for cell viability and consequently null embryos die at the blastocyst stage (32). Moreover, mice lacking TRAP220/PBP, the nuclear receptor interacting component of the TRAP/DRIP/ARC subcomplex of the mediator complex die in utero at E11.5 (8, 44). The two related proteins CBP and p300, which are coactivators for a large number of transcription factors, are both required for embryonic development, and null embryos die at E9.5 (29, 40). However, there are also examples in which the lack of a coactivator can be compensated for by related factors. In mice lacking SRC-1, which are viable but display partial hormone resistance, elevated levels of SRC-2/TIF2 were detected and proposed to compensate for the lack of SRC-1 (38). Targeted disruption of PCAF resulted in mice without a distinct phenotype; however, elevated levels of PCAF-B/GCN5 were suggested to compensate for the loss of PCAF (39). The lethal phenotype of Rap250-/- embryos might in part be explained by the fact that RAP250 does not have any related homologues that could compensate for its loss. Although mice lacking RAP250 die in utero, we believe that RAP250 has important functions after birth since it is expressed in many tissues in adults. We are presently investigating this possibility using conditional knockout technology.
In summary, we have shown that targeted disruption of the RAP250 gene results in embryonic lethality. Our results demonstrate that RAP250 is essential for normal function of the placenta and indicate a nonredundant but selective function of RAP250 in vivo.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Stefan Teglund, Britt-Marie Skoog, and Gunnel Brolin
for ES cell work; Lars-Ährlund-Richter and Jose Insunsa
for blastocyst injections; Mikael Zmarzlak, Sara Selenius, and
Behnosh Esni for technical assistance; and Urban Lendahl for
analyzing sections of knockout embryo. We also thank Pauline
Flodby and Jason Matthews for critically reading the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Swedish Cancer Fund and by KaroBio AB. P.A. was supported by a fellowship from Svenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk Forskning and by funds from Lars Hiertas Minne and Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse. G.S. was supported by a grant from the Swedish Cancer Fund and B.R. was supported by a grant from the Wallenberg Consortium North for Functional Genomics.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biosciences at Novum, Karolinska Institutet, Novum, S-14157 Huddinge, Sweden. Phone: 46 8 608 9147. Fax: 46 8 774 5538. E-mail:
per.antonson{at}cbt.ki.se.


REFERENCES
1 - Anzick, S. L., J. Kononen, R. L. Walker, D. O. Azorsa, M. M. Tanner, X. Y. Guan, G. Sauter, O. P. Kallioniemi, J. M. Trent, and P. S. Meltzer. 1997. AIB1, a steroid receptor coactivator amplified in breast and ovarian cancer. Science 277:965-968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Barak, Y., M. C. Nelson, E. S. Ong, Y. Z. Jones, P. Ruiz-Lozano, K. R. Chien, A. Koder, and R. M. Evans. 1999. PPAR gamma is required for placental, cardiac, and adipose tissue development. Mol. Cell 4:585-595.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Caira, F., P. Antonson, M. Pelto-Huikko, E. Treuter, and J.-Å. Gustafsson. 2000. Cloning and characterization of RAP250, a novel nuclear receptor coactivator. J. Biol. Chem. 275:5308-5317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Chen, H. W., R. J. Lin, R. L. Schiltz, D. Chakravarti, A. Nash, L. Nagy, M. L. Privalsky, Y. Nakatani, and R. M. Evans. 1997. Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300. Cell 90:569-580.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Fondell, J. D., H. Ge, and R. G. Roeder. 1996. Ligand induction of a transcriptionally active thyroid hormone receptor coactivator complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:8329-8333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Glass, C. K., and M. G. Rosenfeld. 2000. The coregulator exchange in transcriptional functions of nuclear receptors. Genes Dev. 14:121-141.[Free Full Text]
7 - Hong, H., K. Kohli, A. Trivedi, D. L. Johnson, and M. R. Stallcup. 1996. GRIP1, a novel mouse protein that serves as a transcriptional coactivator in yeast for the hormone binding domains of steroid receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:4948-4952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Ito, M., and R. G. Roeder. 2001. The TRAP/SMCC/Mediator complex and thyroid hormone receptor function. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 12:127-134.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Ito, M., C.-X. Yuan, H. J. Okano, R. B. Darnell, and R. G. Roeder. 2000. Involvement of the TRAP220 component of the TRAP/SMCC coactivator complex in embryonic development and thyroid hormone action. Mol. Cell 5:683-693.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Iwasaki, T., W. W. Chin, and L. Ko. 2001. Identification and characterization of a RRM-containing coactivator activator (CoAA) as TRBP-interacting protein, and its splice variant as a coactivator modulator (CoAM). J. Biol. Chem. 276:33375-33383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Jung, D. J., S. Y. Na, D. S. Na, and J. W. Lee. 2002. Molecular cloning and characterization of CAPER, a novel coactivator of activating protein-1 and estrogen receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 277:1229-1234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Kastner, P., J. M. Grondona, M. Mark, A. Gansmuller, M. LeMeur, D. Decimo, J. L. Vonesch, P. Dolle, and P. Chambon. 1994. Genetic analysis of RXR alpha developmental function: convergence of RXR and RAR signaling pathways in heart and eye morphogenesis. Cell 78:987-1003.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Ko, L., G. R. Cardona, and W. W. Chin. 2000. Thyroid hormone receptor-binding protein, an LXXLL motif-containing protein, functions as a general coactivator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6212-6217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Kubota, N., Y. Terauchi, H. Miki, H. Tamemoto, T. Yamauchi, K. Komeda, S. Satoh, R. Nakano, C. Ishii, T. Sugiyama, K. Eto, Y. Tsubamoto, A. Okuno, K. Murakami, H. Sekihara, G. Hasegawa, M. Naito, Y. Toyoshima, S. Tanaka, K. Shiota, T. Kitamura, T. Fujita, O. Ezaki, S. Aizawa, T. Kadowaki, et al. 1999. PPAR gamma mediates high-fat diet-induced adipocyte hypertrophy and insulin resistance. Mol. Cell 4:597-609.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Lee, S. K., S. L. Anzick, J. E. Choi, L. Bubendorf, X. Y. Guan, Y. K. Jung, O. P. Kallioniemi, J. Kononen, J. M. Trent, D. Azorsa, B. H. Jhun, J. H. Cheong, Y. C. Lee, P. S. Meltzer, and J. W. Lee. 1999. A nuclear factor, ASC-2, as a cancer-amplified transcriptional coactivator essential for ligand-dependent transactivation by nuclear receptors in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 274:34283-34293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Lee, S. K., S. Y. Jung, Y. S. Kim, S. Y. Na, Y. C. Lee, and J. W. Lee. 2001. Two distinct nuclear receptor-interaction domains and CREB-binding protein-dependent transactivation function of activating signal cointegrator-2. Mol. Endocrinol. 15:241-254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Li, H., P. J. Gomes, and J. D. Chen. 1997. RAC3, a steroid/nuclear receptor-associated coactivator that is related to SRC-1 and TIF2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8479-8484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Luo, J., R. Sladek, J. A. Bader, A. Matthyssen, J. Rossant, and V. Giguere. 1997. Placental abnormalities in mouse embryos lacking the orphan nuclear receptor ERR-beta. Nature 388:778-782.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Mahajan, M. A., and H. H. Samuels. 2000. A new family of nuclear receptor coregulators that integrate nuclear receptor signaling through CREB-binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:5048-5063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Mangelsdorf, D. J., and R. M. Evans. 1995. The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors. Cell 83:841-850.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Misra, P., C. Qi, S. Yu, S. H. Shah, W. Q. Cao, M. S. Rao, B. Thimmapaya, Y. Zhu, and J. K. Reddy. 2002. Interaction of PIMT with transcriptional coactivators CBP, p300, and PBP differential role in transcriptional regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 277:20011-20019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Näär, A. M., P. A. Beaurang, S. Zhou, S. Abraham, W. Solomon, and R. Tjian. 1999. Composite co-activator ARC mediates chromatin-directed transcriptional activation. Nature 398:828-832.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Oñate, S. A., S. Y. Tsai, M. J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley. 1995. Sequence and characterization of a coactivator for the steroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 270:1354-1357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24 - Qi, C., Y. Zhu, J. Pan, A. V. Yeldandi, M. S. Rao, N. Maeda, V. Subbarao, S. Pulikuri, T. Hashimoto, and J. K. Reddy. 1999. Mouse steroid receptor coactivator-1 is not essential for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha-regulated gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1585-1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Rachez, C., B. D. Lemon, Z. Suldan, V. Bromleigh, M. Gamble, A. M. Näär, H. Erdjument-Bromage, T. Paul, and L. P. Freedman. 1999. Ligand-dependent transcription activation by nuclear receptors requires the DRIP complex. Nature 398:824-828.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 - Rachez, C., Z. Suldan, J. Ward, C. P. Chang, D. Burakov, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and L. P. Freedman. 1998. A novel protein complex that interacts with the vitamin D3 receptor in a ligand-dependent manner and enhances VDR transactivation in a cell-free system. Genes Dev. 12:1787-1800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Sapin, V., P. Dolle, C. Hindelang, P. Kastner, and P. Chambon. 1997. Defects of the chorioallantoic placenta in mouse RXRalpha null fetuses. Dev. Biol. 191:29-41.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Takeshita, A., G. R. Cardona, N. Koibuchi, C. S. Suen, and W. W. Chin. 1997. TRAM-1, a novel 160-kDa thyroid hormone receptor activator molecule, exhibits distinct properties from steroid receptor coactivator-1. J. Biol. Chem. 272:27629-27634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Tanaka, Y., I. Naruse, T. Maekawa, H. Masuya, T. Shiroishi, and S. Ishii. 1997. Abnormal skeletal patterning in embryos lacking a single Cbp allele: a partial similarity with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:10215-10220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30 - Torchia, J., D. W. Rose, J. Inostroza, Y. Kamei, S. Westin, C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1997. The transcriptional co-activator p/CIP binds CBP and mediates nuclear-receptor function. Nature 387:677-684.[CrossRef][Medline]
31 - Treuter, E., L. Johansson, J. S. Thomsen, A. Wärnmark, J. Leers, M. Pelto-Huikko, M. Sjöberg, A. P. H. Wright, G. Spyrou, and J.-Å. Gustafsson. 1999. Competition between TRAP220 and TIF2 for binding to nuclear receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 274:6667-6677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32 - Tudor, M., P. J. Murray, C. Onufryk, R. Jaenisch, and R. A. Young. 1999. Ubiquitous expression and embryonic requirement for RNA polymerase II coactivator subunit Srb7 in mice. Genes Dev. 13:2365-2368.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33 - Voegel, J. J., M. J. Heine, C. Zechel, P. Chambon, and H. Gronemeyer. 1996. TIF2, a 160 kDa transcriptional mediator for the ligand-dependent activation function AF-2 of nuclear receptors. EMBO J. 15:3667-3675.[Medline]
34 - Wang, Z., D. W. Rose, O. Hermanson, F. Liu, T. Herman, W. Wu, D. Szeto, A. Gleiberman, A. Krones, K. Pratt, R. Rosenfeld, C. K. Glass, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 2000. Regulation of somatic growth by the p160 coactivator p/CIP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13549-13554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35 - Weiss, R. E., J. Xu, G. Ning, J. Pohlenz, B. W. O'Malley, and S. Refetoff. 1999. Mice deficient in the steroid receptor co-activator 1 (SRC-1) are resistant to thyroid hormone. EMBO J. 18:1900-1904.[CrossRef][Medline]
36 - Wendling, O., P. Chambon, and M. Mark. 1999. Retinoid X receptors are essential for early mouse development and placentogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:547-551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37 - Xu, J., L. Liao, G. Ning, H. Yoshida-Komiya, C. Deng, and B. W. O'Malley. 2000. The steroid receptor coactivator SRC-3 (p/CIP/RAC3/AIB1/ACTR/TRAM-1) is required for normal growth, puberty, female reproductive function, and mammary gland development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6379-6384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38 - Xu, J., Y. Qiu, F. J. DeMayo, S. Y. Tsai, M. J. Tsai, and B. W. O'Malley. 1998. Partial hormone resistance in mice with disruption of the steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) gene. Science 279:1922-1925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39 - Yamauchi, T., J. Yamauchi, T. Kuwata, T. Tamura, T. Yamashita, N. Bae, H. Westphal, K. Ozato, and Y. Nakatani. 2000. Distinct but overlapping roles of histone acetylase PCAF and of the closely related PCAF-B/GCN5 in mouse embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:11303-11306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40 - Yao, T. P., S. P. Oh, M. Fuchs, N. D. Zhou, L. E. Ch'ng, D. Newsome, R. T. Bronson, E. Li, D. M. Livingston, and R. Eckner. 1998. Gene dosage-dependent embryonic development and proliferation defects in mice lacking the transcriptional integrator p300. Cell 93:361-372.[CrossRef][Medline]
41 - Yuan, C. X., M. Ito, J. D. Fondell, Z. Y. Fu, and R. G. Roeder. 1998. The TRAP220 component of a thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein (TRAP) coactivator complex interacts directly with nuclear receptors in a ligand-dependent fashion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:7939-7944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42 - Zhu, Y., L. Kan, C. Qi, Y. S. Kanwar, A. V. Yeldandi, M. S. Rao, and J. K. Reddy. 2000. Isolation and characterization of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) interacting protein (PRIP) as a coactivator for PPAR. J. Biol. Chem. 275:13510-13516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43 - Zhu, Y., C. Qi, W. Q. Cao, A. V. Yeldandi, M. S. Rao, and J. K. Reddy. 2001. Cloning and characterization of PIMT, a protein with a methyltransferase domain, which interacts with and enhances nuclear receptor coactivator PRIP function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:10380-10385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44 - Zhu, Y., C. Qi, Y. Jia, J. S. Nye, M. S. Rao, and J. K. Reddy. 2000. Deletion of PBP/PPARBP, the gene for nuclear receptor coactivator peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-binding protein, results in embryonic lethality. J. Biol. Chem. 275:14779-14782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45 - Zhu, Y. J., C. Qi, S. Jain, M. S. Rao, and J. K. Reddy. 1997. Isolation and characterization of PBP, a protein that interacts with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 272:25500-25506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2003, p. 1260-1268, Vol. 23, No. 4
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.4.1260-1268.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sferruzzi-Perri, A. N., Macpherson, A. M., Roberts, C. T., Robertson, S. A.
(2009). Csf2 Null Mutation Alters Placental Gene Expression and Trophoblast Glycogen Cell and Giant Cell Abundance in Mice. Biol. Reprod.
81: 207-221
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhu, Y. T., Hu, L., Qi, C., Zhu, Y.-J.
(2009). PRIP Promotes Tumor Formation through Enhancing Serum-responsive Factor-mediated FOS Expression. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 14485-14492
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Garapaty, S., Xu, C.-F., Trojer, P., Mahajan, M. A., Neubert, T. A., Samuels, H. H.
(2009). Identification and Characterization of a Novel Nuclear Protein Complex Involved in Nuclear Hormone Receptor-mediated Gene Regulation. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 7542-7552
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lee, J., Saha, P. K., Yang, Q.-H., Lee, S., Park, J. Y., Suh, Y., Lee, S.-K., Chan, L., Roeder, R. G., Lee, J. W.
(2008). Targeted inactivation of MLL3 histone H3-Lys-4 methyltransferase activity in the mouse reveals vital roles for MLL3 in adipogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 19229-19234
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Antonson, P., Jakobsson, T., Almlof, T., Guldevall, K., Steffensen, K. R., Gustafsson, J.-A.
(2008). RAP250 Is a Coactivator in the Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Signaling Pathway That Interacts with Smad2 and Smad3. J. Biol. Chem.
283: 8995-9001
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Li, Q., Chu, M.-J., Xu, J.
(2007). Tissue- and Nuclear Receptor-Specific Function of the C-Terminal LXXLL Motif of Coactivator NCoA6/AIB3 in Mice. Mol. Cell. Biol.
27: 8073-8086
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mahajan, M. A., Murray, A., Levy, D., Samuels, H. H.
(2007). Nuclear Receptor Coregulator (NRC): Mapping of the Dimerization Domain, Activation of p53 and STAT-2, and Identification of the Activation Domain AD2 Necessary for Nuclear Receptor Signaling. Mol. Endocrinol.
21: 1822-1834
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schaiff, W. T., Knapp, F. F. Jr., Barak, Y., Biron-Shental, T., Nelson, D. M., Sadovsky, Y.
(2007). Ligand-Activated Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor {gamma} Alters Placental Morphology and Placental Fatty Acid Uptake in Mice. Endocrinology
148: 3625-3634
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Konno, T., Rempel, L. A., Arroyo, J. A., Soares, M. J.
(2007). Pregnancy in the Brown Norway Rat: A Model for Investigating the Genetics of Placentation. Biol. Reprod.
76: 709-718
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yeom, S.-Y., Kim, G. H., Kim, C. H., Jung, H. D., Kim, S.-Y., Park, J.-Y., Pak, Y. K., Rhee, D.-K., Kuang, S.-Q., Xu, J., Han, D. J., Song, D.-K., Lee, J. W., Lee, K.-U., Kim, S.-W.
(2006). Regulation of Insulin Secretion and {beta}-Cell Mass by Activating Signal Cointegrator 2. Mol. Cell. Biol.
26: 4553-4563
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Choi, E., Lee, S., Yeom, S.-Y., Kim, G. H., Lee, J. W., Kim, S.-W.
(2005). Characterization of Activating Signal Cointegrator-2 as a Novel Transcriptional Coactivator of the Xenobiotic Nuclear Receptor Constitutive Androstane Receptor. Mol. Endocrinol.
19: 1711-1719
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Watson, E. D., Cross, J. C.
(2005). Development of Structures and Transport Functions in the Mouse Placenta. Physiology
20: 180-193
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mahajan, M. A., Samuels, H. H.
(2005). Nuclear Hormone Receptor Coregulator: Role in Hormone Action, Metabolism, Growth, and Development. Endocr. Rev.
26: 583-597
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hultman, M. L., Krasnoperova, N. V., Li, S., Du, S., Xia, C., Dietz, J. D., Lala, D. S., Welsch, D. J., Hu, X.
(2005). The Ligand-Dependent Interaction of Mineralocorticoid Receptor with Coactivator and Corepressor Peptides Suggests Multiple Activation Mechanisms. Mol. Endocrinol.
19: 1460-1473
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Moore, J. M. R., Guy, R. K.
(2005). Coregulator Interactions with the Thyroid Hormone Receptor. Mol. Cell. Proteomics
4: 475-482
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, H., Kuang, S.-Q., Liao, L., Zhou, S., Xu, J.
(2004). Haploid Inactivation of the Amplified-in-Breast Cancer 3 Coactivator Reduces the Inhibitory Effect of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} and Retinoid X Receptor on Cell Proliferation and Accelerates Polyoma Middle-T Antigen-Induced Mammary Tumorigenesis in Mice. Cancer Res.
64: 7169-7177
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Qi, C., Kashireddy, P., Zhu, Y. T., Rao, S. M., Zhu, Y.-J.
(2004). Null Mutation of Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-interacting Protein in Mammary Glands Causes Defective Mammopoiesis. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 33696-33701
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jia, Y., Qi, C., Kashireddi, P., Surapureddi, S., Zhu, Y.-J., Rao, M. S., Le Roith, D., Chambon, P., Gonzalez, F. J., Reddy, J. K.
(2004). Transcription Coactivator PBP, the Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor (PPAR)-binding Protein, Is Required for PPAR{alpha}-regulated Gene Expression in Liver. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 24427-24434
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dey, S. K., Lim, H., Das, S. K., Reese, J., Paria, B. C., Daikoku, T., Wang, H.
(2004). Molecular Cues to Implantation. Endocr. Rev.
25: 341-373
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lim, H. J., Moon, I., Han, K.
(2004). Transcriptional Cofactors Exhibit Differential Preference toward Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors {alpha} and {delta} in Uterine Cells. Endocrinology
145: 2886-2895
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reddy, J. K.
(2004). Peroxisome Proliferators and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha}: Biotic and Xenobiotic Sensing. Am. J. Pathol.
164: 2305-2321
[Full Text]
-
Goo, Y.-H., Na, S.-Y., Zhang, H., Xu, J., Hong, S., Cheong, J., Lee, S.-K., Lee, J. W.
(2004). Interactions between Activating Signal Cointegrator-2 and the Tumor Suppressor Retinoblastoma in Androgen Receptor Transactivation. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 7131-7135
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Smith, C. L., O'Malley, B. W.
(2004). Coregulator Function: A Key to Understanding Tissue Specificity of Selective Receptor Modulators. Endocr. Rev.
25: 45-71
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Qi, C., Surapureddi, S., Zhu, Y.-J., Yu, S., Kashireddy, P., Rao, M. S., Reddy, J. K.
(2003). Transcriptional Coactivator PRIP, the Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma})-interacting Protein, Is Required for PPAR{gamma}-mediated Adipogenesis. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 25281-25284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]