Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2003, p. 1278-1291, Vol. 23, No. 4
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.4.1278-1291.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20521 Turku,1 Department of Biochemistry and Food Chemistry,2 Department of Biology, University of Turku, FIN-20014 Turku,3 Department of Biology, Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20520 Turku,4 Wallac Oy, PerkinElmer Life Sciences, FIN-20101 Turku, Finland5
Received 16 July 2002/ Returned for modification 21 August 2002/ Accepted 18 November 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
), and TRAIL causes in responsive cells oligomerization or aggregation of the receptor and activation of the cytoplasmic caspase machinery, resulting in disruption of normal cellular and nuclear morphology followed by DNA fragmentation and finally apoptosis (for review see reference 59). The TRAIL (67) receptors are members of the TNF receptor family and are widely expressed on the surface of many different cell types. The resistance of cells to TRAIL seems to be tightly regulated in a cell-type- and differentiation-dependent manner. TRAIL induces apoptosis in several cancer cell lines, whereas most nontransformed cells are resistant to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis (52, 67). Therefore, TRAIL has been regarded as a potential anticancer agent. Although the TRAIL receptors have been established as bona fide death receptors, with similar assembly of FADD and caspase 8 to the death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) (6), as has been shown for Fas, the mechanisms regulating the resistance against TRAIL-mediated apoptosis are not equally well established. To fully understand the physiological roles of TRAIL and to enable optimal exploitation of its anticancer properties, it is important to gain detailed knowledge of the molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways conferring TRAIL receptor sensitivity.
Apoptotic responses are regulated at several different levels, for example, at the activated receptor, along the mitochondrial pathway, and at the level of caspase activation, enabling a finely tuned regulation by antiapoptotic and proapoptotic signals and proteins. FLICE inhibitory protein (FLIP) was first found in viruses (v-FLIP) (61), and subsequently, protein homologs in vertebrate cells were identified as c-FLIP (27), also named as Casper (57), I-FLICE (25), FLAME-1 (58), CASH (18), CLARP (26), MRIT (19), and usurpin (54). Cellular FLIP exists as two alternatively spliced isoforms: c-FLIPL is homologous to caspase 8, except in lacking critical amino acids for proteolytic caspase activity, whereas c-FLIPS consists of only two death effector domains (DED) (see Fig. 5A). While there are various results on the role of c-FLIP in apoptotic signaling, the majority of studies have established c-FLIP as a potent suppressor of apoptotic signals especially induced by the Fas receptor (for review see reference 37). The variation in the obtained results from different cellular and apoptosis models suggests that c-FLIP is far from the only regulator of death receptor signaling and that c-FLIP-independent regulation exists. c-FLIP is recruited to the activated death receptor via FADD, thereby either preventing the recruitment of procaspase 8 to the DISC or inhibiting the proximity-induced activation of caspase 8 (38, 55). c-FLIP expression has been reported to fluctuate in a cell-type-specific manner and in response to various stimuli: transcriptionally through the NF-
B pathway (36, 47) and at the protein level via altered rates of proteasomal degradation (15, 34), which makes it a versatile inhibitor of apoptotic responses mediated by death receptors. Therefore, it is not surprising that upregulation of c-FLIP has been shown in several cancer cell lines that are resistant to death ligand-induced apoptosis. For example, high levels of c-FLIPL have been reported in melanoma cells (27) and elevated expression of c-FLIP has also been linked to the escape of tumors from immune surveillance (14, 46).
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Sensitization corresponds to downregulation of c-FLIP. (A) A schematic comparison of c-FLIP isoforms and procaspase 8 (modified from reference 37). (B and C) Western blot analysis of c-FLIPL and c-FLIPS, respectively, in K562 cells treated with 30 µM hemin for indicated time periods. Hsc70 was blotted to show equal loading. (D) To analyze hemin-induced apoptotic sensitivity, K562 cells were pretreated with 30 µM hemin for indicated time periods, followed by a 3-h TRAIL treatment to induce apoptosis. The amount of apoptosis was determined by Western blot analysis of PARP to detect the cleaved fragment of PARP (85 kDa). Equal loading is shown by Hsc70.
|
|
|
|---|
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting. For Western blot analysis cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (30 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and Complete mini protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]) and were centrifuged to remove cell debris. The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method, and each lysate containing 30 to 50 µg of protein was loaded and resolved on a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Protran nitrocellulose; Schleicher & Schuell) by using a semidry transfer apparatus (Bio-Rad). Western blotting was performed using antibodies against poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) (Sigma), caspase 8 (C15 caspase 8 antibody [a kind gift from Peter Krammer, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany]), DR4 (Santa Cruz), DR5 (Santa Cruz, Alexis), TNF-R1 (Santa Cruz), Bcl-XL (Santa Cruz), c-FLIP (Alexis, NF6 FLIP antibody; kindly provided by Peter Krammer), FADD (Transduction Laboratories), and Hsc70 (StressGen). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Promega, Amersham, and Southern Biotechnology. The bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence method (ECL; Amersham).
Microscopic analysis of cellular morphology. After 16 h of hemin treatment, 5 x 105 cells were treated with TRAIL together with M2 antibody and sealed into an incubation chamber. After 3 h, cellular morphology was analyzed by viewing live cells under a Leica DMRB microscope using differential interference contrast (DIC) illumination.
Caspase 3 activity assay. After hemin and TRAIL treatments, cells were harvested with centrifugation and washed once with PBS. Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 10% glycerol) and were centrifuged to remove cell debris. Caspase 3 activity was assayed from lysed samples consisting of 3 x 104 cells with the LANCE homogenous time-resolved fluorescence quench caspase 3 assay according to the manufacturer's protocol (Wallac Oy, PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential by confocal microscopy. To measure mitochondrial membrane potential, hemin-treated and untreated cells were equilibrated with 50 nM tetramethyl rhodamine methyl ester (TMRM; Molecular Probes) in RPMI 1640 buffered with 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.2) for 1 h at 37°C in darkness. Subsequently, TRAIL and M2 antibody were added to the equilibration medium. TMRM fluorescence and transmitted light images at given time points were collected with a Leica TCS SP confocal microscope with a 63x 1.4-numerical-aperture oil immersion planapochromat objective. Red fluorescence of TMRM was imaged by using 568-nm excitation light from an argon/krypton laser, and emitted light was collected through 575 to 705 nm.
Analysis of cytochrome c immunofluorescence by confocal microscope. For immunofluorescence analysis, K562 cells were centrifuged on glass coverslips, washed with PBS, and fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde. Subsequently, cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100-PBS for 10 min at room temperature. After blocking with normal goat serum (GS), samples were incubated with mouse anti-cytochrome c antibody (clone 6H2.B4; BD Pharmingen) (1:150 in PBS-0.01% Triton X-100 with 1.5% GS) for 2 h in a humidified dark chamber at 37°C. After three washes with PBS-0.01% Triton-X-100, samples were incubated with Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (1:150 in PBS-0.01% Triton X-100 with 1.5% GS; Molecular Probes) for 45 min in a dark chamber. After three washes with PBS-0.01% Triton X-100, the nuclei were counterstained with 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (0.1 µg/ml) and coverslips were mounted on microscope slides in 80% glycerol in PBS. Cytochrome c release and nuclear morphology of the cells were imaged by a Leica TCS SP MP confocal microscope with a 63x 1.4-numerical-aperture oil immersion planapochromat objective. Alexa 488 fluorescence was excited by using a 488-nm excitation line from an argon/krypton laser, and the emission window was set at 492 to 560 nm. DAPI fluorescence was imaged by using multiphoton excitation at 780 nm from a Ti-Sapphire (Tsunami) laser. Emission was recorded at 400 to 490 nm.
Surface expression analysis of DR4 and DR5. Cells (n = 0.5 x 106) were treated with hemin for 16 h and then washed two times with PBS. After washing, cells were blocked for 30 min with 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS. Cells were then incubated with DR4- or DR5-specific antibodies (5 µg/ml; Alexis) in 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 min followed by washing with PBS. Finally, cells were incubated with Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Molecular Probes) for 30 min. After washes, cells were analyzed on a FACScan flow cytometer. Samples without primary antibody were used as negative controls.
Biotin labeling of cell surface proteins. After treatments, 3 x 106 cells were washed once with PBS and were incubated 15 min at room temperature with 0.5 µg of EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce)/ml in PBS. After incubation, cells were lysed with lysis buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors and the lysate was cleared by centrifugation. Lysates were incubated for 2 h at 4°C with streptavidin-coated agarose beads (Pierce), and the beads were washed three times with lysis buffer. The beads were boiled in 3x Laemmli sample buffer, and samples were resolved by SDS-8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Western blotting was performed as described above.
RNase protection assay. K562 cells (n = 5 x 106) were treated as indicated, and total RNA was isolated with the Trizol (Gibco-BRL) method according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The amount of various apoptosis-related transcripts and the internal controls L32 and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was analyzed by using the hAPO-3b multiprobe template set (Pharmingen). Probe synthesis, hybridization, and RNase treatments were done with the RiboQuant Multi-Probe RNase Protection Assay System (Pharmingen) following the manufacturer's instructions. Protected RNA was resolved on a 5% urea polyacrylamide gel and quantified with a phosphorimager (Fuji).
Fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis of cellular caspase 3 activity. After treatments, cells were washed once with ice-cold PBS and the caspase 3 activity was analyzed with the phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated monoclonal active caspase 3 antibody apoptosis kit 1 (BD Pharmingen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, cells were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm solution followed by two washes with Perm/Wash buffer. PE-conjugated anti-active caspase 3 antibody was diluted in the Perm/Wash buffer and incubated with the fixed cells. After one wash with Perm/Wash buffer, cells were analyzed for PE fluorescence by flow cytometry.
Plasmid constructs, stable cell lines, and transfections. For transfections, 5 x 106 K562 cells were centrifuged and resuspended in 0.4 ml of OptiMEM (Gibco-BRL) and 30 µg of plasmid DNA encoding FLAG-tagged c-FLIPL or c-FLIPS (a kind gift from Jürg Tschopp, Institute of Biochemistry, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland) was added. Cells were subjected to a single electric pulse (975 µF, 200 V) in 0.4-cm gap electroporation cuvettes (BTX) using a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser electroporator, followed by dilution to 5 x 105 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum and antibiotics. For making stable cell lines, neomycin-resistant cells were selected by G418 (500 µg/ml; Life Technologies, Inc.) for 2 weeks. The resistant pool was serially diluted on a 96-well plate in the presence of G418 selection. Single-cell clones were upscaled and screened for c-FLIP expression by Western blotting.
TRAIL receptor immunoprecipitation and DISC analysis. K562 cells (4 x 107/sample) were left untreated or pretreated with 30 µM hemin for 16 h at a cell density of 4 x 105/ml. To stimulate TRAIL receptors, cells were pelleted (500 x g, 7 min) and were resuspended in 1 ml of prewarmed RPMI medium, and thereafter 1 µg of FLAG-tagged TRAIL (Alexis) and 2 µg of anti-FLAG monoclonal M2 antibody (Sigma) were added to the cell suspension. Cells were incubated in a 37°C water bath for 20 min, and the reaction was stopped by adding 10 ml of ice-cold PBS to the cell suspension. Cells were pelleted, washed with ice-cold PBS, and lysed in 1 ml of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.2% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, and Complete protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]) for 30 min on ice. The cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. The amount of protein was determined by Bradford assay, and an equal amount of protein from each sample was precleared with 50 µl of Sepharose-CL-4B for 2 h at 4°C. One microgram of TRAIL and 1 µg of M2 antibody were added to unstimulated control lysates. Immunoprecipitation was carried out with 15 µl of protein G beads (Amersham) for 2.5 h at 4°C. Beads were washed six times in 1 ml of lysis buffer, finally resuspended in 3x Laemmli sample buffer, and boiled for 3 min. About one-third of immunoprecipitation samples and 20 to 50 µg of protein from cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-12.5 or 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Western blotting was performed as described above.
|
|
|---|
(29), and TRAIL (13). Since several studies indicate that death receptor responses are strictly regulated upon erythroid differentiation (11, 69), we examined whether induction of K562 cells to erythroid differentiation would affect their sensitivity to death receptor-mediated apoptosis. Pretreatment with hemin had no effect on the sensitivity to FasL or TNF-
(data not shown), whereas TRAIL potently induced apoptosis in differentiating K562 cells, as illustrated by views of live K562 cells under DIC illumination (Fig. 1A). TRAIL treatment alone did not have any apparent effect on proliferation or differentiation status of K562 cells (data not shown). Enhanced cleavage of procaspase 8 to intermediate cleaved fragment (p43/41) and active p18 caspase subunit was observed after a 2-h TRAIL treatment in differentiating K562 cells, whereas only a modest cleavage of procaspase 8 to the intermediate fragment was detectable in nondifferentiating cells (Fig. 1B). Caspase 3, in turn, was only activated in differentiating TRAIL-stimulated cells with kinetics similar to those of caspase 8 when the enzymatic activity of caspase 3 was analyzed by measuring DEVDase activity, i.e., the proteolytic activity toward a synthetic substrate containing the consensus sequence DEVD (Fig. 1C), or by detecting the cleavage of its physiological substrate PARP to the 85-kDa fragment (Fig. 1D). It is notable that hemin itself did not induce any caspase 8 or caspase 3 activity.
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Hemin-mediated differentiation sensitizes K562 cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. (A) K562 cells pretreated for 16 h with or without hemin were treated or left untreated for 3 h with 100 ng of TRAIL/ml together with 2 µg of M2 cross-linking antibody/ml. The apoptotic morphology was detected by DIC microscopy. Ctrl, control. (B) K562 cells were treated for the indicated time periods with TRAIL and M2 antibody after a 16-h incubation with or without 30 µM hemin. For procaspase 8 cleavage detection, cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting as indicated in Materials and Methods. The appearance of cleaved p18 subunit indicates activation of caspase 8; p43/41 represents the intermediate cleaved forms of caspase 8. Unspecific bands are marked with asterisks. (C) K562 cells were treated as described for panel B, and DEVDase activity was analyzed from cell lysates with a time-resolved fluorometry-based caspase 3 assay. (D) Western blot analysis of PARP to detect a cleaved fragment of PARP (85 kDa), resulting from caspase 3 activity, was performed from the same samples as those used for panel B. Equal loading is shown by Hsc70 blotting.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Erythroid differentiation of HEL cells and granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 cells, but not megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells, sensitizes to TRAIL. (A) Analysis of apoptosis in HEL cells after combined hemin (60 µM, 24 h) and TRAIL (3 h) treatments by using PE-conjugated antibody recognizing active caspase 3. The bars show mean values (mean ± standard error of the mean) from two independent flow cytometry analyses with four replicas altogether. (B) Analysis of apoptosis in HL-60 after treatments with DMSO (1%, 24 h) and TRAIL (3 h). The data show mean values (mean ± standard error of the mean) from a single experiment with two replicas, and it is a representative of three independent experiments. (C) K562 cells were pretreated with TPA (20 nM) or hemin (30 µM) for 24 h and were stimulated with TRAIL for 3 h. The data showing mean values (mean ± standard error of the mean) from a single experiment with duplicates are representative of three independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Hemin-treated K562 cells retain their mitochondrial membrane potential during TRAIL-induced apoptosis. (A) Western blot analysis of Bcl-XL in K562 cells treated with hemin for indicated time periods. Hsc70 was blotted to show equal loading. (B) K562 cells treated with hemin for 16 h were loaded with TMRM to measure mitochondrial membrane potential. After treatment with TRAIL for 3 h, the red fluorescence ofTMRM was analyzed using confocal microscopy. Jurkat cells were used as a positive control for the mitochondrial depolarization. The overlay images of transmission light and TMRM fluorescence are shown. Cells displaying characteristic apoptotic morphology, with abundant membrane blebs, are marked with arrows. The confocal images shown are representative of three independent experiments. (C) To analyze the subcellular localization of cytochrome c, K562 cells were treated with hemin (16 h) in combination with TRAIL and M2 (3 h). After treatments the cells were fixed and centrifuged on a coverslip. Cells were labeled with antibodies specific to cytochrome c combined with fluorescent secondary antibody (green). DNA (red) was visualized by DAPI staining. Immunolabeling was analyzed by confocal microscopy. Maximum projection of a stack of 32 optical sections from a cell undergoing nuclear fragmentation is shown separately.
|
Differentiation-mediated sensitization is not accompanied by upregulation of death receptors DR4 and DR5. Since many chemotherapeutic agents have been shown to mediate TRAIL sensitization via upregulation of the surface expression of TRAIL receptors, we examined whether erythroid differentiation leads to an elevated surface expression of DR4 and DR5. For this purpose, we immunolabeled DR4 and DR5 receptors with monoclonal antibodies, together with fluorescent secondary antibodies, and analyzed the surface expression of the DRs by flow cytometry. No major differences were found in expression of either DR4 or DR5 after 16 h of hemin treatment (Fig. 4A). Although it has been earlier shown that K562 cells do not express decoy receptors for TRAIL (13), we wanted to confirm that downregulation of TRAIL decoy receptors does not play a role in this sensitization. TRAIL-binding receptors were saturated on the cell surface with FLAG-tagged TRAIL, after which they were immunolabeled with FLAG-specific antibody and fluorescent secondary antibody. The flow cytometry analysis did not show any changes in TRAIL-binding ability (Fig. 4A), which together with the data from DR4 and DR5 expression analysis indicates that overall expression of TRAIL receptors was not changed during hemin treatment. The flow cytometry analysis was complicated by the increase in autofluorescence after hemin treatment, which can be seen from the secondary antibody controls (Fig. 4A). This was most probably due to the increased synthesis of fluorescent porphyrins during differentiation (43). To overcome the background fluorescence in hemin-treated samples, the surface proteins of unpermeabilized cells were labeled with biotin and purified with streptavidin-coated agarose. Based on Western blot analysis of purified cell surface proteins, there was no increase in the surface expression of DR4 or DR5 during hemin-induced differentiation (Fig. 4B), excluding the possibility that elevated surface expression of TRAIL receptors might contribute to the observed sensitization.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Surface expression of DR4 and DR5 is not increased during erythroid differentiation of K562 cells. (A) For surface analysis of TRAIL receptors, K562 cells were treated for 16 h with 30 µM hemin or left untreated. After treatments the cells were incubated on ice in the absence or presence of DR4- and DR5-specific antibodies or with TRAIL followed by an incubation with M2 antibody. After PBS washes the cells were incubated with fluorescent secondary antibodies. The fluorescence intensity was analyzed with flow cytometry. The thin line indicates cells only incubated with the secondary antibody (secondary antibody control); the thick line indicates the specific labeling. (B) Cell surface proteins from untreated (C) and hemin-treated (He) (16 h) cells were labeled with biotin and purified with streptavidin-coated agarose beads. The amount of DR4 and DR5 was detected by Western blotting. TNF-R1 is shown as a loading control.
|
c-FLIP expression has been proposed to be regulated by mechanisms involving changes in transcription and mRNA stability (for review see reference 37). Therefore, we examined the c-FLIP mRNA levels upon hemin treatment using RNase protection assay with a set of probes specific to apoptosis-related transcripts. As shown in Fig. 6, during a 16-h hemin treatment, c-FLIP mRNA was downregulated to 60% of the control levels when normalized against the L32 housekeeping gene. Although clearly reproducible, the downregulation was relatively modest in comparison to the protein levels, suggesting that additional downregulation is also likely to occur at the protein level. Surprisingly, the mRNA levels of caspase 8 were upregulated 1.9-fold, although no increase in the protein levels could be detected.
![]() View larger version (54K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. c-FLIP mRNA is modestly downregulated in hemin-treated K562 cells. RNase protection assay analysis of various apoptosis-related genes, including c-FLIP, in cells left untreated (C) or treated with hemin for 16 h (H16). Each signal was normalized by using the L32 housekeeping gene as an internal control. The normalized value corresponding to the amount of mRNA after hemin treatment was divided by the normalized control value shown as fold induction. Results represent the mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments with a total five pairs of samples.
|
1.5 fold stronger in hemin-treated cells. As expected, c-FLIPL and c-FLIPS were readily recruited to the DISC in TRAIL-stimulated cells, whereas, in hemin-treated cells, no c-FLIP was found in the DISC. It is also worth noticing that all c-FLIPL recruited to the DISC was cleaved to the p43 fragment. The immunoprecipitation experiments also supported the assumption that K562 cells are so-called type I cells, in which a large amount of DISC is formed upon TRAIL receptor stimulation.
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Downregulation of c-FLIP alters the composition of TRAIL receptor (TRAIL-R) DISC. (A) For TRAIL receptor DISC analysis, K562 cells treated with hemin (16 h) or left untreated were stimulated with TRAIL and M2 for 20 min and then lysed. For unstimulated samples, TRAIL and M2 were added after lysis. TRAIL receptor DISC was immunoprecipitated (IP) using Protein G-Sepharose. Coimmunoprecipitated DISC proteins (FADD, caspase 8, and c-FLIP) were analyzed by Western blotting. DR5 was probed to control successful immunoprecipitation. The presence of the proteins in cell lysates before immunoprecipitation is shown on the right. The migration positions of proteins are indicated. Treatments were as follows: C, control; H, hemin; T, TRAIL; HT, hemin and TRAIL. (B) To study the effect of caspase 8 inhibition on TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in K562 cells, the cells were treated with hemin (16 h) or left untreated followed by a 3-h TRAIL induction in the presence or absence of 10 µM caspase 8-specific inhibitor Z-IETD-fmk. The amount of apoptosis was determined by labeling the cells with PE-conjugated antibody specific to active caspase 3. The fluorescence of the cells was analyzed by flow cytometry.
|
Stable overexpression of c-FLIP prevents hemin-mediated sensitization. In order to study the effect of c-FLIP on TRAIL-induced apoptotic signaling, we generated stable cell lines overexpressing different amounts of FLAG-tagged c-FLIPL (1F6, 2E10, and 2G11) and c-FLIPS (1E5 and 2E11) (Fig. 8A). To determine, whether expression of ectopic c-FLIP could rescue K562 cells from hemin-mediated sensitization to TRAIL, c-FLIPL and c-FLIPS cell lines were subjected to hemin-mediated differentiation followed by TRAIL receptor stimulation. In addition to parental K562 cells, a neomycin-resistant pool containing an empty plasmid was used as a mock control. As shown in Fig. 8B, all c-FLIPL-overexpressing cell lines were efficiently protected from apoptotic TRAIL signaling, showing only 4 to 8% of apoptosis after hemin-induced sensitization, whereas the parental K562 and the mock-transfected cells displayed 25 to 30% apoptosis. Thus, the efficiency of the c-FLIPL protection was comparable with the effect of caspase 8 inhibitor Z-IETD-fmk. Interestingly, 1F6 displaying the lowest expression level was the most resistant cell line, suggesting that the apoptotic machinery in K562 cells becomes saturated with a relatively modest amount of c-FLIPL and that an excess may have a proapoptotic effect, as has been shown by others using different cell systems (27, 57). Similar experiments with the cell lines stably overexpressing c-FLIPS revealed that the antiapoptotic capacity of ectopic c-FLIPS was even stronger than that of c-FLIPL. No trace of elevated apoptosis could be detected in c-FLIPS-overexpressing cells after the combined treatments with hemin and TRAIL (Fig. 8C).
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Stable overexpression of both c-FLIP isoforms prevents differentiation-mediated sensitization. (A) Western blot analysis of c-FLIP from parental K562 cells, a mock-transfected cell pool, and cell lines stably overexpressing c-FLIPL (1F6, 2E10, and 2G11) or c-FLIPS (1E5 and 2E11). Equal loading is shown by Hsc70. (B and C) Analysis of apoptosis in c-FLIPL and c-FLIPS cell lines, respectively, in response to hemin (16 h) and TRAIL (3 h) treatments by using PE-conjugated antibody recognizing active caspase 3. The bars show mean values (mean ± standard error of the mean) from three independent flow cytometry analyses.
|
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. DISC analysis of cell lines overexpressing c-FLIP isoforms. G, sample devoid of TRAIL and M2; C, control; H, hemin; T, TRAIL; HT, hemin and TRAIL. Parental K562 cells and lines stably overexpressing c-FLIPL (1F6) or c-FLIPS (1E5) were treated with 30 µM hemin (16 h), stimulated with TRAIL and M2 for 20 min, and then lysed. For the control samples, TRAIL and M2 were added after cell lysis. TRAIL receptor DISC was immunoprecipitated (IP) using Protein G-Sepharose. The specificity of immunoprecipitation was controlled with the sample devoid of TRAIL and M2. The immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting using anti-FADD, anti-caspase 8, anti-c-FLIP, and anti-DR5 antibodies. The presence of the proteins in cell lysates before immunoprecipitation is shown below. The migration positions of proteins are indicated. For c-FLIPL and c-FLIPS, the upper band represents the exogenous protein and the lower band represents the endogenous protein.
|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have shown that TRAIL is especially efficient in killing malignant cells but not normal cells. The use of TRAIL as an anticancer agent has been studied both in vivo and in vitro (4, 31, 40, 65). Unlike chemotherapy and irradiation, TRAIL has been reported to be capable of inducing apoptosis in several cell lines independently of the mitochondrial pathway and is, therefore, especially promising for elimination of cells that express large amounts of Bcl-2 or Bcl-XL (64). Although previous studies have shown that prolonged erythroid differentiation in K562 cells leads to downregulation of Bcl-XL (5, 60), our results demonstrate that the levels of Bcl-XL remained high within the time frame during which a strong sensitization occurred. In addition, we observed that TRAIL induced no or only a minor loss in the mitochondrial membrane potential and only a partial release of cytochrome c in late apoptotic cells. Furthermore, Bcl-2 overexpression did not protect differentiating K562 cells from TRAIL-induced apoptosis (data not shown). Taken together, these results suggest that the TRAIL sensitivity in K562 cells is mediated by apoptotic activation mechanisms independent of mitochondria.
In addition to the mitochondrial apoptotic signaling pathway, death receptor responses can be regulated at the level of the death receptor complex. It seems that the latter mode of regulation can be adjusted specifically, without affecting the overall sensitivity of the cell to other types of apoptotic stimuli. Several recent studies underline the importance of c-FLIP as a specific gatekeeper, adjusting death receptor responses at the level of DISC (for review see reference 37). For example, c-FLIP-/- embryonic fibroblasts have been shown to be highly sensitive to FasL- or TNF-
-induced apoptosis, showing rapid induction of caspase 8 and caspase 3 activities in response to death receptor stimulation (68). In our study, hemin-mediated differentiation induced a strong overall downregulation of c-FLIP, concomitantly with increasing TRAIL sensitivity. Based on these results, together with those reported by others, c-FLIP appears in death receptor-insensitive cells to be efficiently recruited to the activated receptor, thereby affecting the dynamics of procaspase 8 cleavage.
The multifaceted regulatory role of c-FLIP emerges from the presence of two c-FLIP isoforms. As shown for Fas (38, 55) and in this study for TRAIL receptors c-FLIPL and c-FLIPS regulate distinct steps of procaspase 8 cleavage, since c-FLIPL promotes and c-FLIPS inhibits the first cleavage of caspase 8. This has been further addressed by two recent studies showing that heterodimerization of caspase 8 with c-FLIPL leads to increased proteolytic activity and efficient binding to synthetic substrates (7, 48). While the biochemical basis of the proteolytic activity of the caspase 8-FLIPL heterodimer is only now starting to emerge, the antiapoptotic mechanism of c-FLIPL remains enigmatic. One potential mechanism for c-FLIPL suggested by Micheau and coworkers (48) is targeting of the proteolytic activity of caspase 8 to execute nonapoptotic functions. Another open question is the physiological significance of the presence of two c-FLIP isoforms with differential activities. This diversity is likely to yield both versatility and efficacy to the regulation of death receptor responses and caspase 8 cleavage. In this respect, it has been suggested that the c-FLIP isoforms have a dual role in death receptor signaling: (i) acting as caspase 8 inhibitors and (ii) conferring the nonapoptotic signaling with which death receptors connect. Regarding the inhibitory role, two isoforms give the advantage of a broader range of inhibition, as there is an actively regulated stoichiometric balance between c-FLIPL and c-FLIPS (3, 35). Therefore, the obtained effect extends from that of a single inhibitor, when only one isoform responds to a stimulus, to the synergistic effect between the two c-FLIP isoforms. The synergy has been demonstrated by results showing that the antiapoptotic capacity of coexpressed c-FLIPL and c-FLIPS is more potent than that of a single isoform alone (38). In fact, the results in our study support the assumption of isoform-specific regulation of the expression, as the kinetics of c-FLIPL and c-FLIPS downregulation were different.
The differential activity of the c-FLIP isoforms could also relate to the protective signals mediated by death receptors, independently of their effects on caspase 8. By its ability to recruit important signaling activators to the DISC (e.g., Raf-1, TRAF1, TRAF2, and RIP), c-FLIP has been shown to be involved in death receptor-mediated activation of antiapoptotic signaling pathways, such as NF-
B and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK (32). Among the caspase-independent signals activated by death receptors, the MAPK/ERK has especially been demonstrated to have a dominant-inhibiting effect on both Fas (21, 22, 23) signaling and TRAIL (62) signaling, both of which are primarily unaffected by NF-
B protection. Whether downregulation of c-FLIP-mediated activation of MAPK/ERK signaling (and possibly NF-
B) contributes to the regulation of TRAIL sensitivity in the K562 model system remains to be addressed in forthcoming studies.
Great expectations await the employment of TRAIL as an anticancer treatment, since TRAIL has been shown to have potent antitumor effects when administered in vivo to mice and nonhuman primates (4, 65). The recent data on the elevated prevalence of certain types of tumors in TRAIL-deficient mice have further corroborated the importance of TRAIL in the elimination of tumor target cells (10). In the case of normal and malignant hematopoietic cells, TRAIL is emerging as a possible regulator, but a comprehensive understanding is still elusive. For example, immature erythroid cells have been shown to express several death receptors, DR4 and DR5 among others, and the sensitivity of the differentiating erythroblasts to the death receptor stimuli, especially FasL, is carefully controlled during the differentiation process (11, 12). This control is assumed to contribute to negative regulation of erythropoiesis, maintaining the homeostasis of red blood cells. Similar to FasL, TRAIL has been shown to act as a negative regulator of erythropoiesis in adult peripheral blood CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (69). Since TRAIL was shown to selectively kill erythropoietic cells at a certain stage of differentiation, it is plausible that death receptor responses in hematopoietic cells are regulated in a lineage- and differentiation stage-specific manner. However, although TRAIL is able to kill normal differentiating erythroblasts, other reports indicate that it is more potent in selectively killing malignant hematopoietic cells than in killing their normal counterparts (53). For example, in the case of myelodysplastic syndrome, TRAIL preferably targets malignant progenitor cells (70).
This study demonstrates that triggering differentiation in malignant cells modulates the cellular machinery that determines how death receptor signals are routed in a cell and differentiation lineage-specific manner. Therefore, these results support the concept of inducing cell differentiation as a form of anticancer therapy, aiming at maturation of the malignant cell clone and thereby lowering the threshold to apoptosis (for review see reference 41). Although the cytotoxic activity of many conventional chemotherapeutic drugs as well as radiation therapy is often enhanced when combined with TRAIL treatment (8, 16, 17, 33), only a few examples of exploiting TRAIL in combination with differentiating agents are available (20, 49). In the case of normal hematopoietic cells, differentiation leads to increased sensitivity to death receptor stimuli. It is tempting to speculate that combining TRAIL treatments with induction of differentiation could have potential to enhance elimination of malignant cells. However, the full ramifications of the interplay between TRAIL receptor signaling and c-FLIP expression in normal and malignant cells remain to be elucidated in future studies.
We are grateful to Peter Krammer for caspase 8 and c-FLIP antibodies and Jürg Tschopp for c-FLIP constructs. We also thank the members of our laboratories for technical help and constructive criticism during the course of this study and Mika Korkeamäki for help with flow cytometry.
Financial support was obtained from the Academy of Finland, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and the Finnish Cancer Organizations. V.H. and M.P. were supported by the Turku Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences.
|
|
|---|
B inducers upregulate cFLIP, a cycloheximide-sensitive inhibitor of death receptor signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3964-3973.
B signals induce the expression of c-FLIP. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:5299-5305.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»