Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2003, p. 2489-2500, Vol. 23, No. 7
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.7.2489-2500.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Akira Kobayashi,1,
Toshiharu Yamashita,1,
Tomomasa Shimanuki,1 Osamu Nakajima,2 Satoru Takahashi,2 Shiro Ikegami,3 Kaoru Inokuchi,3 Keisuke Yamashita,4 Masayuki Yamamoto,2 and Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama1,5*
Department of Biomolecular Science, Graduate School of Life Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578,1 Center for Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance and Institute for Basic Medical Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577,2 Mitsubishi Kagaku Institute of Life Sciences, Machida, Tokyo 194-8511,3 Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 734-8551,4 Core Research for Evolutionary Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan5
Received 14 June 2002/ Returned for modification 7 October 2002/ Accepted 19 December 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is known that thyroid hormone T3 (3,5,3'-triiodothyronine) is essential for normal development of the vertebrate central nervous system (CNS) (18, 26, 34). Defective levels of thyroid hormone cause abnormal development of the vertebrate CNS, resulting in neurological defects, including irreversible mental retardation (18, 26). The effects of T3 are known to be mediated by the cognate thyroid hormone receptors, which heterodimerize with retinoid X receptor (20, 33) before binding to the TRE sequence in the promoter of target genes. However, relatively little is known about the functional role of T3 in brain development because the information regarding the target genes is limited. Differential hybridization was performed to search for T3-regulated genes in vertebrates such as the frog and the rat (3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 24, 32, 35), and the BTEB gene was identified as one of the most distinct T3-responsive genes in the Xenopus tadpole (3, 4). The enhanced expression of the BTEB gene in response to T3 has also been confirmed in the developing CNS of the rodent and was demonstrated to be a transcriptional event by a nuclear run-on assay (4). Overexpression of the BTEB gene in the cultured neuroblastoma cell line Neuro-2A stimulated neurite outgrowth of the cells but did not induce acetylcholine esterase activity, indicating that BTEB fulfilled at least a partial role in the multiple T3 actions in vertebrate neurogenesis (4).
To investigate the functional role of BTEB per se and at least a part of T3 effects on mouse brain development, we generated BTEB gene knockout mice. The lacZ gene was inserted into the reading frame of the first exon in BTEB gene by homologous recombination, such that ß-galactosidase (ß-Gal) expression mimics the expression of BTEB, thereby facilitating the survey of pathological abnormalities due to a lack of BTEB expression.
Homozygous BTEB knockout (BTEB-/-) mice were bred by apparently normal Mendelian genetics from a cross between heterozygous BTEB+/- mutant mice and grew normally and were fertile. Expression of BTEB dramatically increased in the brain, especially in the hippocampus and cerebellum, at around postnatal day 7 (P7), the time when synapses begin to mature in the CNS. Examination of general locomotor activities, motor coordination, and memory tasks revealed that BTEB mutant mice exhibit deficits in motor coordination and in learning and memory tasks, which are principally associated with cerebellar and hippocampal functions, respectively.
|
|
|---|
Targeted disruption of the BTEB gene in ES cells. E14 embryonic stem (ES) cells were cultured, transformed with the targeting vector, and screened by standard methods (9). The linearized targeting vector DNA (80 µg) was electroporated into ES cells (107 cells/ml), and the cells were subjected to double selection by using G418 (300 µg/ml) and ganciclovir (2 µM). After 10 days, isolated clones were expanded and genomic DNAs were prepared for determination of homologous recombination.
Blastocysts were harvested from 3.5-day postcoital (dpc) C57BL/6j females and the homologous recombinant ES cells were injected into the blastocoel cavities of the 3.5-dpc blastocysts. Injected blastocysts were surgically transferred into uteri of 2.5-dpc pseudopregnant Jcl:ICR mothers (9). Male chimeric pups with an extensive ES cell contribution to their coat color were bred with C57BL/6j females, and germ line transmission of the dominant agouti color marker was assessed in the resulting offspring. Germ line transmission of the defective BTEB allele was screened by the PCR method and subsequently confirmed by DNA blot analysis by using DNA prepared from tails. The primer pair and DNA probe used for the PCR and the DNA blot analysis, respectively, were as follows: the neo sequence at the 5' end, 5'-CAG TCA TAG CCG AAT AGC CTC TCC ACC CAA-3', and the endogenous BTEB-flanking sequence at the 3' end, 5'-CAG TCA TAG CCG AAT AGC CTC TCC ACC CAA-3' for PCR and the NdeI-AseI fragment (1 kb) for DNA blot analysis. PCR analysis consisted of 30 cycles of 98°C for 20 s, 60°C for 45 s, and 68°C for 3 min with LA Taq (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan). For DNA blot analysis, tail DNAs were digested with NdeI and HindIII and subjected to 1% gel electrophoresis for blot hybridization.
ß-Gal staining and TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling). ß-Gal staining was carried out as described previously (9), with embryos or adult tissues fixed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 2% paraformaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde, and 0.05% Nonidet P-40. For detection of ß-Gal, specimens were soaked in PBS containing 20% sucrose, embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura, Tokyo, Japan), and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Specimen sections of 30 µm were cut in a cryostat.
The TUNEL method was performed to detect apoptosis in brains according to the manufacturer's instruction (TaKaRa). Brains (P7) were fixed in neutralized formalin. Paraffin sections (3 µm) were subjected to the TUNEL experiment by using the in situ apoptosis detection kit (TAKARA).
Immunohistochemistry. Development of Purkinje cells was studied by immunostaining with an anti-IP3R1 (1,4,5-inositol trisphosphate receptor 1) antibody. Dissected brains were fixed in Boun's solution for 2 h. Paraffin sections (8 µm thick) in the parasagittal plane were processed sequentially as described previously (27).
RNA analysis.
mRNAs were analyzed by the reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) method as described previously (28). Total RNA was prepared from mouse brains and aliquots (1 µg/ml) were reverse transcribed with random primers at 37°C for 60 min. The reverse transcripts were quantified by the PCR method. An aliquot (1 µl) of synthesized cDNA was amplified in a total volume of 20 µl containing 150 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 0.2 U of Taq polymerase, and 0.12 µg of each pair of primers described below and [
-32P]dCTP (4 µCi/20 µl). For BTEB, the 5' and 3' primers were 5'-ATG TCC GCG GCC GCC GCC GCC TAC AT-3' and 5'-TCT GCA CTG TGG GAG GCC AG-3', respectively. For ß-actin control, the 5' and 3' primers were 5'-ATG GAT GAC GAT ATC GCT-3' and 5'-ATG AGG TAG TCT GTC AGG 4T-3', respectively. PCR was performed as 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 60°C, and 1 min at 72°C. The PCR products were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel with ß-actin as a control.
Treatment of mice. In all experiments, littermates from cross-mating between BTEB+/- mice were used, and their genotypes were determined by PCR analysis of tail DNA samples. All of the mice used for the experiments were 10- to 15-week-old males. The mice were kept on a 12-h light-dark cycle at a constant temperature (23 ± 1°C). The tests were always conducted between 13:00 and 18:00. A week prior to the behavioral tests, one mouse was housed per cage and handled three times daily.
General activity. Locomotion and rearing behavior were measured by the method described previously (12) in an open-field box (32 by 32 by 20 cm) placed in a sound-attenuated room that was different from the room used for fear conditioning. Two pairs of a 7-by-7 array infrared photosensors were set against the outer wall and equally spaced in the lower and upper rows at intervals of 2 and 4.5 cm, respectively, above the floor. The frequency at which a photobeam was interrupted represented the movement of the animal and was recorded by computer. Each mouse was kept in the box for 30 min.
Light-dark choice test. The apparatus consisted of two compartments and was placed in a dark and sound-attenuated room. One compartment was a bright (250 lx) chamber of 16 by 32 by 20 cm illuminated by a white bulb (60 W), and the other was a dark (1 lx) chamber of the same dimensions. The two compartments were separated by a wall and connected by seven small openings (3 by 9 cm) through which the photobeam sensors passed. A mouse was placed in the center of the light chamber and its behavior was monitored by video camera. The mouse was considered to have entered the new area when all four feet were placed in that area. The following behavioral measures were scored: the time spent in the light and dark compartments, the number of transitions made between the two compartments, and the latency of the initial movement from the light to the dark room.
Rotorod test. The rotorod test was carried out as described previously (6). Mice were placed on a rod and the rod began to rotate at a constant velocity of 15 rpm. The test was continued for 3 min. The time that the mouse stayed on the rotating rod was measured. The test was done once a day for each mouse and repeated for 5 days.
Contextual fear conditioning. The experiment of contextual fear conditioning was performed as described previously (13). The conditioning chamber was an observation box (20 by 20 by 20 cm) constructed from clear and gray vinylchloride plates. The floor of the chamber consisted of 26 stainless steel rods through which foot shocks were delivered by means of a shock scrambler (SGS 002; Muromachi, Tokyo, Japan). The chamber was placed in a light and sound-attenuated room. A video camera placed in front of the chamber allowed the behavior of each mouse to be observed and recorded in an adjacent room. The shock scrambler and controller for conditioning was operated by remote in the same room. On the training day, each mouse was placed in the chamber for 2.5 min before it received three foot shocks (0.5 mA for 1 s with 2-min intervals). The mice were removed from the chamber 1 min after the last foot shock and returned to their original cages. At 24 h after training, the mice were returned to the chamber, and their behavior over a period of 6 min was observed in the absence of foot shocks. The extent of conditioned fear was measured by scoring the freezing behavior of the mice. Freezing was defined as the absence of visible movement, except for respiration. During the test period, two observers who were blind to the experimental conditions scored the tendency of the mice to freeze by watching the TV monitor. Observations were carried out by using a time-sampling procedure. For every 5 s during the test, the movement of each mouse was judged as either frozen or active. An unbiased estimate of the actual time spent in the frozen position was calculated per minute. After completion of the first fear conditioning test, the mice were returned to their original cages for 24 h and then subjected to a second contextual fear test carried out in the same way as the first.
Electric shock sensitivity test. Since the sensitivity to foot shocks may affect freezing responses, we measured the minimal level of current required for mice to elicit vocalization and jumping by the method described previously (12) after general activity and light-dark choice tests.
Each mouse was placed in the chamber used for the contextual fear conditioning and delivered 1-s shocks of increasing intensity. The interval between shocks was 10 s. The sequence of current used was as follows: 0.05, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and then 0.8 mA. The minimal level of current required to elicit vocalization and jumping was determined. These experiments were performed in a blind manner.
Other activity tests. The horizontal wire-hanging, rod-walking, and gait tests were performed as described previously (13).
Data analysis. Data were analyzed by one- or two-way analysis of variance, and comparison of the paired groups was carried out by the Fisher latest significant difference test. All values in the text and figure legends are expressed as mean values ± the standard errors of the mean, where n is the number of mice tested.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Mutation of mouse BTEB gene. (A) Outline of targeting vector and restriction maps around the first exon. Arrowheads indicate the sites of primers used to distinguish the wild-type BTEB gene from that of the mutant. neo indicates the neomycin-resistant gene, and tk is the thymidine kinase gene under the control of the herpes simplex virus promoter. The sizes of the DNA fragments digested with NdeI are shown below. (B and C) DNA blot analysis of DNA from recombinant cells and mouse tails, respectively. Genomic DNAs were prepared from ES cells and mouse tail, digested with NdeI and HindIII, and electrophoresed in 1% agarose, followed by hybridization with the 5' probe indicated in panel A. (D) Genotyping of the BTEB locus from offspring. PCR analyses were carried out with genomic DNAs from offspring generated by cross-mating heterozygous BTEB+/- mice. The primer pairs were used as described in panel A, and the PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. (E) RT-PCR analyses of BTEB mRNA expression. RNAs were prepared from the brains of wild-type and mutant mice. RT-PCR of the prepared RNAs was performed with a pair of primers as described in Materials and Methods, and the RT-PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) mRNA expression was used as control.
|
![]() View larger version (87K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Expression patterns of BTEB in mouse embryo and adult tissues. (A) Until 11.5 dpc, BTEB was not detected in any organ in mouse embryo. BTEB expression started at 12.5 dpc, and expression was restricted to skeletal tissue. The photos in subpanels a and b are sections indicated by broken lines of BTEB+/- 13.5-dpc embryo with ß-Gal staining. Sections a and b show BTEB expression in the cartilage primordium of nasal capsule and the cartilage primordium of rib, respectively. (B) At 15.5 dpc, BTEB expression extended to the spinal cord, kidney, and lung. (C) BTEB expression in adult mouse tissues was detected rather ubiquitously in various tissues, such as liver, kidney, heart, brain, and tongue tissues. Lung tissue was the only tissue for which we could not detect BTEB expression in adult mice and only a weak expression at the embryonic stage. (D) ß-Gal expression of the cerebellum in BTEB+/- mice showed almost the same expression pattern as observed with immunostaining with anti-BTEB antibody. A P14 BTEB+/- mouse cerebellum sagittal section was stained with ß-Gal, and a BTEB+/+ cerebellum sagittal section was analyzed by using immunohistochemistry with anti-BTEB antibody. Both ß-Gal staining and immunostaining showed identical positive signals in Purkinje cells and the granular cell layer. The negative control for immunohistochemistry was performed with nonimmune serum (right photo). Abbreviations: S, spinal cord; Lu, lung; K, kidney; Li, liver.
|
![]() View larger version (70K): [in a new window] |
FIG.3. Spatiotemporal expression pattern of BTEB in the developmental process of mouse brain. ß-Gal staining was performed with the brain of BTEB+/- heterozygous mice from stage P1 to P30. (A) Sagittal sections of brain from BTEB+/- heterozygous mutant mice at P7 (a) and P30 (b). The "B" and "C" labels in subpanel b indicate the areas of BTEB expression investigated in 3B (hippocampus) and 3C (cerebellum), respectively. (B) Temporal expression of BTEB in hippocampus at various postnatal stages. Heterozygous BTEB+/- mice were killed at P1, P4, P6, P7, and P30. Brains were removed and fixed for ß-Gal staining. The brain specimens were cut at 10 µm. (C) Temporal expression pattern of BTEB in mouse cerebellum at various postnatal stages. The mouse brains were treated as described in panel B. BTEB expression was not detected during early postnatal stages but was detected distinctly at P7. (D) Magnified views of a part of cerebellar specimens in panel C. At P7, BTEB expression started in the external granular layer (EGL), the Purkinje cell layer (PCL), and internal granular layer (IGL). By P30, migration of external-granular-layer cells to the internal granular layer was complete. BTEB expression in the internal granular layer was preserved at P30, whereas its expression faded in the Purkinje cell layer. ML, molecular layer. (E) Cerebellum sections of wild-type mice and homozygous BTEB mutant mice were stained with anti-IP3R1 antibody to analyze the structure of Purkinje cells. Stained areas show dendritic shafts and spines of Purkinje cells.
|
(i) General activity. We measured, as the basis of the behavioral tests, general activities such as locomotion (distance and time), rearing, speed of movement, and choice between light and dark (Fig. 4). The mean activity counts of locomotion and rearing behaviors for 30 min are shown in Fig. 4. These activities of locomotion and rearing behavior appeared to be slightly lower in homozygous mutant BTEB-/- mice than in wild-type mice (19,988.4 ± 77.8 cm and 248.8 ± 21.5 for the wild type and 17,086.5 ± 74.5 cm and 202.3 ± 22.4 for the mutant mice, respectively). However, analysis of variance indicated insignificant differences in the locomotor activity [F(1,108) = 14.66, P < 0.001] and rearing behavior [F(1,108) = 14.89, P < 0.001] between wild-type and BTEB-/- mice, so we did not expect this mild impairment in general activities to greatly influence other behavioral tests (Fig. 4)
![]() ![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Locomotion behaviors of BTEB-/- homozygous mutant and wild-type mice. Distance traveled during locomotion (A), time spent for horizontal movement (movement of more than 1 cm/s was counted) (B), frequency of rearing behavior (counts) (C), speed of movement (D), and the time spent in the light and dark compartments (E) for the preceding 5 min were measured and plotted for the total 30 min in the open-field test. Two pairs of array infrared photosensors were attached to the outer wall equally spaced in lower and upper rows, respectively, 2 and 4.5 cm above the floor. The lower row of photocells was used to measure locomotor activities, and the upper row was used to detect rearing behavior. A computer recorded the number of horizontal photobeam interruptions caused by animal movement. Each mouse was placed in the apparatus and left for 30 min, which was approximately the same time as when it received training trials in the afternoon. The points in the left panels show the average values of the locomotor activities for each 5 min in 30 min, and the bar graphs (right) show the average values of the total activities for 30 min with minimum deviation. In each experiment, wild-type mice (n = 9) and homozygous mutant mice (n = 11) were used.
|
(ii) Rotorod test. Since BTEB was clearly demonstrated to be expressed in Purkinje cell layers of the cerebellum (Fig. 3), we carried out the rotorod task, which is associated with cerebellar function (Fig. 5A). In addition to the general activities described, gait behavior (Fig. 5B), horizontal wire hanging (Fig. 5C), and rod walking (Fig. 5D) were examined as the basis of the rotorod test. In these tests, homozygous BTEB-/- mutant and wild-type mice did not show so much difference as to physically affect the rotorod test. In this task, animals must make continuous adjustments to their balance and posture in order to keep upright on a rod rotating at a constant velocity during each 5-min trial. In general, the BTEB-/- mice (n = 9) exhibited a significant performance deficit compared with the heterozygous BTEB+/- mutant mice (n = 14) (Fig. 5A). On the first day of the experiment, no mouse could stay on the rotating rod for a long time, regardless of the genotype. However, while days of training clearly improved the adjustment performance of heterozygous mice, BTEB-/- mice did not show improved performance in the rotorod test after daily training. These data suggest that the basis of the performance deficit of BTEB-/- mice on the rotorod test is in motor learning and motor coordination (Fig. 5A).
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Rotorod performance in BTEB-/- mutant and wild-type mice. (A) Rotorod test. Fall latencies of the mutant BTEB-/- and wild-type mice on a rod rotating at 15 rpm was measured for 1 s once a day for a consecutive 5 days. Wild-type (n = 9) and mutant mice (n = 11) were used. A maximum of 180 s was tested for each animal per trial. (B) Gait measurement. Representative foot spots of heterozygous and homozygous mutant mice are presented. (C) Horizontal wire-hanging test. Mice were hung on the elevated horizontal wire by the forepaws, and the time in seconds of their hanging on the wire was measured until they fell off the wire. (D) Rod-walking test. Mice were placed on the midpoint of the wooden rod (10 or 15 mm diameter, 60 cm in length), and the time in seconds required for the mice to cross the rod wire was measured. At least nine animals were tested for each genotype.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Contextual fear conditioning task of the wild-type and homozygous BTEB-/- mutant mice. (A) Mean percentages of freezing before and during three foot shocks were determined at 5-s intervals. Three 1-s foot shocks (0.5 mA) were given 3, 4, and 5 min after animals had been placed in a new foot shock-equipped chamber. (B) Mean percentages of freezing behavior of the animals 24 h after the footshock. The foot shock-treated animals in panel A were returned to their original cages for 24 h. Immediately the animals were returned to the footshock chamber, the percentages of freezing behavior of the mice were counted. (C) After the experiments in panel B, the mice were returned to their original cage for another 24 h and then subjected to the same task as in panel B. Observations were carried out by using a time-sampling procedure. For every 5 s, each mouse was judged as either freezing or active during the test. The values were expressed as the average percentages of the mice used for each group with minimal deviations. (D) Sensitivity to foot shock. Sensitivity to foot shock was quantified by measuring minimal levels of current required to elicit two stereotypical behaviors: vocalization and jumping. In each experiment, wild-type mice (n = 9) and homozygous mice (n = 11) were used.
|
|
|
|---|
On the other hand, we found that mouse behavior was significantly affected by BTEB deficiency. Detailed and systematic analyses in gross neurological and motor tasks of the BTEB-/- mutants revealed only slight differences in locomotor activities, rearing behavior, and speed of movement or no difference in the rod-walking test, light-dark choice test, horizontal wire-hanging test, or gait measurements compared to wild-type mice. However, we observed a performance deficit in BTEB-/- mice on the rotating rod, a test considered to involve the function of the cerebellum. Although sensorimotor learning and, therefore, performance on the rotarod cannot easily be attributed to a single brain region, it is widely accepted that the cerebellum is a major component involved in this task (19). Mice with structural abnormalities in the cerebellum or with disruptions in genes richly expressed in the cerebellum exhibit performance deficits on the rotorod (17, 30). The performance deficit of BTEB-/- mice in the rotorod test is consistent with the defective function of BTEB that showed enhanced expression in the cerebellum. In the cerebellum, dynamic BTEB expression was initiated at P7, around the time when synapse formation starts to mature in the mouse brain (8). The formation of the synapses in BTEB-/- mice should be quantitatively analyzed in more detail to see whether the defective rotorod performance of BTEB-/- mice is due to impaired synapse formation.
In connection with the marked expression of BTEB in the pyramidal cell layers of the hippocampus, the BTEB-/- mice displayed a marked defect in contextual freezing response. The freezing deficit of the mutant mice was observed both immediately (immediate after shock freezing) and 1 day (delayed freezing) after the shock was presented. Since several control experiments indicated that BTEB deficiency caused neither a sensory nor a motor performance deficit in the response to foot shock, this result implies that BTEB-/- mice have deficits in the acquisition and preservation of memory. Although various brain areas are considered to be implicated in the process of contextual fear conditioning, the neural circuits of the hippocampus and amygdala, in particular, are responsible for contextual fear conditioning (1, 7, 16, 25). Since BTEB expression increased in the pyramidal cells of the hippocampus at P7 when synapses began to mature in the brain, it is possible that the impaired fear response in the BTEB-deficient mice resulted from impaired synapse formation in the hippocampus. The possible involvement of BTEB in synapse formation is supported by the enhanced neurite outgrowth of Neuro-2A cells resulting from the overexpression of BTEB (4). Additional experiments, such as the water maze test (23) and the conditioning taste aversion test (21, 36), are necessary to determine whether BTEB deficiency causes defective neural processes that are dependent on the hippocampus, the amygdala, or both. It would also be worthwhile and interesting to investigate the target genes of BTEB for further understanding the function of BTEB itself and, at least, a part of T3 function in the development of the central nervous system. The distinct behavioral abnormalities of the BTEB knockout mice and characteristic expression pattern of BTEB will provide a useful system for further investigation of the mechanisms underlying motor function, learning, and memory.
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan and by grants from Core Research for Evolutionary Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology, and Sankyo Co., Ltd.
Present address: The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037-1099. ![]()
Present address: Center for Tsukuba Advanced Research Alliance and Institute for Basic Medical Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»