Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2003, p. 2608-2613, Vol. 23, No. 7
0270-7306/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.7.2608-2613.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital,1 Sir Alastair Currie Cancer Research UK Laboratories, Molecular Medicine Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH4 2XU,3 University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, United Kingdom2
Received 4 October 2002/ Returned for modification 18 November 2002/ Accepted 14 January 2003
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The WT1 gene is deleted or rearranged in some cases of pediatric nephroblastoma (4, 7). Mutations in WT1 also cause Denys-Drash syndrome, characterized by glomerular sclerosis, genitourinary defects, and predisposition to Wilms' tumor (26), and Frasier syndrome, characterized by genitourinary defects and nephropathy without predisposition to Wilms' tumor (2). Consistent with this range of clinical phenotypes, the developing genitourinary system is the major site of WT1 expression (28), although WT1 exhibits a complex pattern of expression in a number of tissues throughout development (1, 37). Mice constitutively lacking WT1 have incomplete diaphragms and show abnormal development of several organs, including the heart, spleen, eyes, and adrenal gland, in addition to a complete absence of kidneys and gonads (12, 17, 23, 34).
The overall amino acid sequences of WT1 proteins are highly conserved throughout vertebrate evolution (15), and the expression patterns of WT1 are similarly conserved, with high levels of WT1 expression found in the developing genitourinary system, mesothelium, and heart (15). The complexity of WT1 protein isoforms, however, is specific to mammals. All vertebrate WT1 genes can insert three amino acids between zinc fingers 3 and 4, while only mammalian WT1 possesses the 17-amino-acid sequence corresponding to exon 5 and the 68-amino-acid N-terminal extension arising from alternative translation initiation (Fig. 1B) (21). The conserved 3-amino-acid sequence, KTS, arising from an alternative splicing event is essential for WT1 function in genitourinary development. Frasier syndrome patients carry a mutation in one allele of WT1 which disrupts this alternative splicing event such that the overall level of KTS+ WT1 isoforms is reduced (2), and mice constitutively producing only KTS+ or KTS- isoforms display abnormal development of both kidneys and gonads (9).
|
Knocking out WT1, or either of its evolutionarily conserved isoforms, has clearly implicated WT1 in the early stages of gonad development. Due to the embryonic lethality of the WT1 null mutation, little is known regarding the function of WT1 later in reproductive development, in particular in those aspects unique to placental mammals. However, a recent study by Kreidberg et al. found reproductive defects in female heterozygous WT1 null mice on a 129/Sv inbred genetic background (18). Given the significant changes to both the genitourinary system and the repertoire of WT1 proteins during evolution, it will be interesting to determine the function of mammal-specific WT1 isoforms.
The 17-amino-acid sequence corresponding to exon 5 is found only in mammals (15, 21) and has been suggested to contain a transcriptional repression domain that interacts with Par4, a transcriptional regulatory protein (29). However, mice lacking this mammal-specific exon develop normally and both males and females are fertile (24).
A further evolutionary acquisition of WT1 is a 68-amino-acid N-terminal extension arising from an upstream CUG initiator codon. Proteins derived from this initiator have been termed the WT* isoforms (3). WT* isoforms behave similarly to WT1 isoforms derived from the AUG initiator; they are localized to the cell nucleus and are capable of mediating transcriptional repression in reporter assays. Western blot analysis of a range of tissues and cell lines has shown that the WT* isoforms are present in all WT1-expressing tissues and cell lines, including testis, ovary, uterus, kidney, and Wilms' tumor (3, 24). The proportion of total WT1 protein arising from the CUG initiator is difficult to determine precisely given that the affinities of particular antibodies may vary between WT1 isoforms, but estimates suggest that up to 20% of total WT1 protein may posses the N-terminal extension (3; N. D. Hastie and M. Niksic, personal communication). It has been suggested that the role of WT* isoforms may be to modify the activity of WT1 within the cell, possibly by heterodimerization with other WT1 isoforms and/or by interaction with different WT1 cofactors (3). The 68-amino-acid sequences of the N-terminal extensions are 70% identical between mouse and human. Although this is less than the percent conservation of exon 1 between mouse and human, one stretch of 27 amino acids shows 89% identity and may represent a functional unit, such as a factor binding domain (Fig. 1A). Comparing synonymous (KS) with nonsynonymous (KA) substitution rates reveals that the WT1 N-terminal extension has been under purifying selection (KA/KS = 0.433) for the last
100 million years. Such analyses show that for the entire coding sequence of the WT1 gene, the KA/KS ratio is 0.051, reflecting the fact that the gene has been under purifying selection throughout vertebrate radiation.
Alternative translation initiation is not a unique feature of the WT1 gene. The Pim-1 proto-oncogene (31) and the fibroblast growth factor 2 (16), antiapoptotic Bag-1 (25), and vascular endothelial growth factor (13) genes all utilize alternative, upstream CUG initiator codons to generate larger protein isoforms. The functional significance of these larger isoforms is not clear; however, it is interesting that fibroblast growth factor 2, Bag-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms initiated by the alternative CUG codon display altered subcellular localization compared with their respective AUG-initiated counterparts.
To determine the function of WT* isoforms during mammalian development, we performed gene targeting to create mice lacking WT* isoforms. Surprisingly, homozygous mice lacking WT* isoforms develop normally and are fertile.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Synthetic oligonucleotide linkers were utilized to introduce the STOP/PstI modification into a 430-bp PmlI restriction fragment encompassing the CUG initiator. This fragment was sequence verified and cloned into pPolyB6. pPolyB6 consists of a 6-kb BglII genomic DNA fragment encompassing exon 1 of WT1 with
2.5 kb of upstream sequence and
1.5 kb of downstream sequence (a kind gift of Jordan Kreidberg) cloned into the pPolyIII vector. The floxed cytomegalovirus-driven hygromycin-herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (hygromycin-HSVtk) fusion gene (kind gift of Julia Dorin) was isolated as a blunt-ended HindIII fragment and cloned into an EcoRV restriction site within a nonconserved region of intron 1. The targeting vector was isolated from plasmid sequences by NotI restriction digestion followed by gel purification.
Production of WT*-deficient mice. One hundred micrograms of gel-purified targeting vector was electroporated into 2 x 107 embryonic day 14 [E14(iv)] embryonic stem (ES) cells (kind gift of Austin Smith). One hundred twenty hygromycin-resistant clones were analyzed by Southern blotting (30) by using the external probe 1 to hybridize PstI-restricted genomic DNA. Fourteen clones were found to contain a correctly targeted WT1 allele. Seven of these clones were analyzed by Southern blotting for the presence of the STOP/PstI modification. Hybridizing PstI-restricted genomic DNA with the internal probe 2 demonstrated that four of the seven correctly targeted clones contained the modification, i.e., in three of the targeted clones analyzed, the recombination complex must have resolved downstream of the modification.
Two correctly targeted clones harboring the STOP/PstI modification were transiently transfected with 50 µg of pMC1-Cre. All of the 20 ganciclovir-resistant colonies selected for Southern blot analysis showed complete excision of the hygromycin-HSVtk fusion gene due to Cre-mediated loxP recombination. Karyotypically normal clones were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts (5), and chimeric male mice were crossed with C57BL/6 females to obtain germ line transmission of the modified allele. Heterozygous mice were maintained by backcrossing to C57BL/6 and homozygous mice generated by intercrossing heterozygotes. Wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous mice were obtained from heterozygous intercrosses at normal Mendelian ratios. To test the fertility of homozygous WT*-deficient animals, 10 homozygous male mice were crossed with CD1 female mice and 10 homozygous female mice were crossed with CD1 male mice.
RNA and protein analysis. Nuclear extracts from fetal kidneys and fetal testes were prepared from freshly isolated tissues as described previously (19), separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on 10% polyacrylamide gels, blotted, and probed with either anti-WT1 polyclonal antibody (C19; Santa Cruz) or anti-WT1 monoclonal antibody (H2; Dako) as described previously (19).
Total RNA was isolated from freshly isolated fetal tissues by using the RNAgents isolation system (Promega) and then subjected to DNAse I treatment (Roche Diagnostics) and a second phenol-chloroform extraction and precipitation. Total RNA was reverse transcribed by using an oligo(dT) primer followed by PCR with oligonucleotides specific for either alternative splicing event of WT1 (all oligonucleotide sequences are available on request).
Histology.
Freshly isolated tissues from
3-month-old homozygous mutant animals and wild-type littermates were fixed overnight in 10% neutral buffered saline at 4°C and dehydrated through increasing concentrations of ethanol. Paraffin-embedded sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Generation of homozygous mutant mice. The targeting vector (Fig. 2A) was electroporated into E14 ES cells. Hygromycin-resistant clones containing the STOP/PstI modification were identified by Southern blotting of PstI-restricted genomic DNA with the external probe (probe 1) and an internal probe (probe 2).
Karyotypically normal clones containing the correctly targeted STOP/PstI modification were transiently transfected with pMC-Cre, and ganciclovir-resistant colonies were tested by Southern blotting for Cre-mediated excision of the hygromycin-HSVtk fusion cassette. One karyotypically normal clone that underwent Cre-mediated excision of the selectable marker was used to create germ line-transmitting chimeric mice.
Mice heterozygous for the mutation were intercrossed, giving rise to normal Mendelian ratios of wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous offspring as determined by Southern blot analysis (Fig. 3A). Homozygous mutant animals were observed to be viable and healthy at up to 1 year of age.
|
Mutant mice are healthy and fertile. WT1 plays a crucial role in the development of both kidneys and gonads, is involved in sex determination, and is expressed in Sertoli cells of the testis and granulosa cells of the ovary, oviduct, uterus, and mammary gland (1, 27, 28, 37). To investigate whether the mammal-specific WT* isoforms are involved in mammalian reproduction, groups of 10 mutant mice were test mated. Normal-sized litters were obtained with both male and female homozygous mutant mice, with homozygous males giving an average litter size of 10.2 (±4.7; n = 10) and homozygous females producing an average litter size of 8.3 (±4.6; n = 10). The observation that homozygous mutant females nursed their offspring to weaning age indicates that the WT* isoforms are not essential for lactation.
Histological analysis was performed on tissues isolated from adult homozygous mutant mice and wild-type littermates to look for any subtle effect of the elimination of WT* isoforms on the development of WT1-expressing tissues. Figure 4 shows hematoxylin- and eosin-stained kidney, testis, ovary, and uterus sections in which there are no discernible differences between wild-type and homozygous mutant tissues, demonstrating that, in the absence of these specific isoforms, there are no histological changes to the organs in which WT1 is known to be expressed.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A surprising finding from the completion of the human genome sequence was that humans possess fewer genes than previous estimates for mammals (14, 35). Recent suggestions that the majority of human genes can give rise to numerous protein isoforms by alternative splicing and/or alternative translation initiation have provided a means by which the proteome can potentially possess the complexity assumed to be necessary for the development of a mammal (22). In this way, WT1 can be seen as a paradigma gene conserved throughout vertebrate radiation and expressed in a highly evolving organ system in all vertebrates which produces numerous mammal-specific protein isoforms, at least some of which exhibit specific properties in in vitro transfection assays. However, this study and the recent results from Natoli et al. provide a cautionary note that the complexity of mammals cannot be solely explained through the possession of a complex proteome.
Why the mammalian WT1 gene produces numerous protein isoforms, however, remains enigmatic. Gene targeting in the mouse has demonstrated a fundamental role for WT1 during mammalian development (17) and has subsequently been refined to show that the 3-amino-acid sequence produced by an alternative splicing event common to all vertebrates is essential for normal genitourinary development (9). Significantly, elimination of either KTS+ or KTS- isoforms has dramatic consequences for development. The demonstration that both WT* isoforms and those containing the amino acid sequence corresponding to exon 5 are dispensable for mammalian development suggests that the evolution of the WT1 gene has not been the driving force for mammalian genitourinary evolution per se. However, the fact that the KA/KS ratio is 0.433 for the N-terminal extension shows that there has been selection at the amino acid level for this domain. It may be that these evolutionary acquisitions by WT1 are involved in a pathway which has evolved and, as suggested by Natoli et al., that WT* isoforms (and those containing the sequence corresponding to exon 5) modify the action of WT1 in a subtle way which could be exposed by careful gene expression profiling of tissues from these mutant mice (24).
In order to seek subtle changes, for example, through a gene expression profile, it will be necessary to breed this mutation (and that described by Natoli et al.) into a range of inbred mouse strains to eliminate "hybrid vigor" and allow precise comparisons of gene expression levels between mutant and wild-type mice. In this regard, it is interesting that the phenotypes of WT1 null mutant mice show a range of severity depending upon genetic backgroundsome homozygous WT1 null mice survive until birth on an outbred genetic background, while C57BL/6 inbred WT1 null mice die at around 13 days of gestation (12, 17), and 129/Sv inbred WT1 heterozygous null female mice have small ovaries and are infertile, while outbred heterozygous females display normal reproduction (18). In addition, a recent study has shown that up to 25% of mice with reduced levels of WT1 expression succumb to a fatal glomerulosclerosis within 6 months of birth (8). WT*-deficient mice show no overt mutant phenotype at up to 1 year of age, although, as with other WT1-associated phenotypes, it will be necessary to study WT*-deficient mice on a number of pure genetic backgrounds to determine if they display a subtle mutant kidney phenotype.
Finally, the generation of ES cells harboring the WT* STOP/PstI mutation allows, in combination with exon 5 deletion, for the creation of doubly targeted ES cells from which mice deficient in all major mammal-specific WT1 isoforms can be derived. Given that both WT1 and the tissues in which it is expressed have evolved, this experiment could shed light on the continuing enigma of why the mammalian WT1 gene produces so many different protein isoforms. It may be that WT* isoforms and those containing the sequence corresponding to exon 5 have coevolved, and perhaps these two sets of isoforms perform a mammal-specific yet redundant function.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was funded by the Medical Research Council (United Kingdom), and C.G.M. was in receipt of an MRC Research (Training) Fellowship.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Barbaux, S., P. Niaudet, M. C. Gubler, J. P. Grunfeld, F. Jaubert, F. Kuttenn, C. N. Fekente, T. N. Souleyreau, E. Thibaud, M. Fellous, and K. McElreavey. 1997. Donor splice site mutations in WT1 are responsible for Frasier syndrome. Nat. Genet. 17:467-470.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Bruening, W., and J. Pelletier. 1996. A non-AUG translation initiation event generates novel WT1 isoforms. J. Biol. Chem. 271:8646-8654.
4. Call, K. M., T. Glaser, C. Y. Ito, A. J. Buckler, J. Pelletier, D. A. Haber, E. A. Rose, A. Kral, H. Yeger, and W. H. Lewis. 1990. Isolation and characterization of a zinc finger polypeptide gene at the human chromosome 11 Wilms' tumor locus. Cell 60:509-520.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Dorin, J. R., P. Dickinson, E. W. Alton, S. N. Smith, D. M. Geddes, B. J. Stevenson, W. L. Kimber, S. Fleming, A. R. Clarke, M. L. Hooper, et al. 1992. Cystic fibrosis in the mouse by targeted-insertional mutagenesis. Nature 359:211-215.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Englert, C. 1998. WT1more than a transcription factor? Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:389-393.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Gessler, M., A. Poustka, W. Cavenee, R. L. Neve, S. H. Orkin, and G. A. Bruns. 1990. Homozygous deletion in Wilms tumours of a zinc-finger gene identified by chromosome jumping. Nature 343:774-778.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Gou, J.-K., A. L. Menke, M.-C. Gubler, A. R. Clarke, D. Harrison, A. Hammes, N. D. Hastie, and A. Schedl. 2002. WT1 is a key regulator of podocyte function: reduced expression levels cause crescentic glomerulonephritis and mesangial sclerosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11:651-659.
9. Hammes, A., J. K. Gou, G. Lutsch, J. R. Leheste, D. Landrock, U. Ziegler, M. C. Gubler, and A. Schedl. 2001. Two splice variants of the Wilms' tumor 1 gene have distinct functions during sex determination and nephron formation. Cell 106:319-329.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Hastie, N. D. 1994. Wilms' tumour: a case of disrupted development. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28:523-558.[Medline]
11. Hastie, N. D. 2001. Life, sex, and WT1 isoformsthree amino acids can make all the difference. Cell 106:391-394.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Herzer, U., A. Crocoll, D. Barton, N. Howells, and C. Englert. 1999. The Wilms tumor suppressor gene wt1 is required for development of the spleen. Curr. Biol. 9:837-840.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Huez, I., S. Bornes, D. Bresson, L. Creancier, and H. Prats. 2001. New vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms generated by internal ribosome entry site-driven CUG translation initiation. Mol. Endocrinol. 15:2197-2210.
14. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Nature 409:860-921.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Kent, J., A. M. Coriat, P. T. Sharpe, N. D. Hastie, and V. van Heyningen. 1995. The evolution of WT1 sequence and expression pattern in the vertebrates. Oncogene 11:1781-1792.[Medline]
16. Kevil, C., P. Carter, B. Hu, and A. DeBenedetti. 1995. Translational enhancement of FGF-2 by eIF-4 factors, and alternative utilization of CUG and AUG codons for translation initiation. Oncogene 11:2339-2348.[Medline]
17. Kreidberg, J. A., H. Sariola, J. M. Loring, M. Maeda, J. Pelletier, D. Housman, and R. Jaenisch. 1993. WT-1 is required for early kidney development. Cell 74:679-691.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Kreidberg, J. A., T. A. Natoli, L. McGinnis, M. Donovan, J. D. Biggers, and A. Amstutz. 1999. Coordinate action of Wt1 and a modifier gene supports embryonic survival in the oviduct. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 52:366-375.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Ladomery, M. R., J. Slight, S. McGhee, and N. D. Hastie. 1999. Presence of WT1, the Wilm's tumor suppressor gene product, in nuclear poly(A)(+) ribonucleoprotein. J. Biol. Chem. 274:36520-36526.
20. Lee, S. B., and D. A. Haber. 2001. Wilms tumor and the WT1 gene. Exp. Cell Res. 264:74-99.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Miles, C., G. Elgar, E. Coles, D. J. Kleinjan, V. van Heyningen, and N. D. Hastie. 1998. Complete sequencing of the Fugu WAGR region from WT1 to PAX6: dramatic compaction and conservation of synteny with human chromosome 11p13. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:13068-13072.
22. Modrek, B., and C. Lee. 2002. A genomic view of alternative splicing. Nat. Genet. 30:13-19.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Moore, A. W., L. McInnes, J. Kreidberg, N. D. Hastie, and A. Schedl. 1999. YAC complementation shows a requirement for Wt1 in the development of the epicardium, adrenal gland and throughout nephrogenesis. Development 126:1845-1857.[Abstract]
24. Natoli, T. A., A. McDonald, J. A. Alberta, M. E. Taglienti, D. E. Housman, and J. A. Kreidberg. 2002. A mammal-specific exon of WT1 is not required for development or fertility. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:4433-4438.
25. Packham, G., M. Brimmell, and J. L. Cleveland. 1997. Mammalian cells express two differently localized Bag-1 isoforms generated by alternative translation initiation. Biochem. J. 328:807-813.
26. Pelletier, J., W. Bruening, C. E. Kashtan, S. M. Mauer, J. C. Manivel, J. E. Striegel, D. C. Houghton, C. Junien, R. Habib, L. Fouser, et al. 1991. Germline mutations in the Wilms' tumor suppressor gene are associated with abnormal urogenital development in Denys-Drash syndrome. Cell 67:437-447.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Pelletier, J., M. Schalling, A. J. Buckler, A. Rogers, D. A. Haber, and D. Housman. 1991. Expression of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1 in the murine urogenital system. Genes Dev. 5:1345-1356.
28. Pritchard-Jones, K., S. Fleming, D. Davidson, W. Bickmore, D. Porteous, C. Gosden, J. Bard, A. Buckler, J. Pelletier, D. Housman, V. van Heyningen, and N. Hastie. 1990. The candidate Wilms' tumour gene is involved in genitourinary development. Nature 346:194-198.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Richard, D. J., V. Schumacker, B. Royer-Pakora, and S. G. Roberts. 2001. Par4 is a coactivator for a splice isoform specific transcriptional activation domain in WT1. Genes Dev. 15:328-339.
30. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
31. Saris, C. J., J. Domen, and A. Berns. 1991. The pim-1 oncogene encodes two related protein-serine/threonine kinases by alternative initiation at AUG and CUG. EMBO J. 10:655-664.[Medline]
32. Sharma, P. M., M. Bowman, S. L. Madden, F. J. Rauscher III, and S. Sukumar. 1994. RNA editing in the Wilms' tumor susceptibility gene, WT1. Genes Dev. 8:720-731.
33. Sonnhammer, E. L., and R. Durbin. 1995. A dot-matrix program with dynamic threshold control suited for genomic DNA and protein sequence analysis. Gene 167:GC1-GC10.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
35. Venter, J. C., M. D. Adams, E. W. Myers, P. W. Li, R. J. Mural, G. G. Sutton, H. O. Smith, M. Yandell, C. A. Evans, R. A. Holt, et al. 2001. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291:1304-1351.
36. Wagner, K. D., N. Wagner, V. P. Vidal, G. Schley, D. Wilhelm, A. Schedl, C. Englert, and H. Scholz. 2002. The Wilms' tumor gene Wt1 is required for normal development of the retina. EMBO J. 21:1398-1405.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Zhou, J., F. J. Rauscher III, and C. Bondy. 1993. Wilms' tumor (WT1) gene expression in rat decidual differentiation. Differentiation 54:109-114.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|