Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2004, p. 4734-4742, Vol. 24, No. 11
0270-7306/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.11.4734-4742.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115,1 Banting and Best Department of Medical Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L6, Canada,2 Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan3
Received 21 January 2004/ Returned for modification 27 February 2004/ Accepted 16 March 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The general transcription factor TFIID consists of the TBP and 13 to 14 TBP-associated factors (TAFs) (26). TAFs are involved in promoter recognition and response to some activators. The largest TAF protein (TAF1, formerly known as TAFII250) has been assigned a variety of activities. Human TAF1 (hTAF1) has been reported to possess two kinase domains that lead to autophosphorylation (5). The protein may also have ubiquitin-activating, conjugating, and acetylase activities that modify histones and basal transcription factors (12, 30). Two bromodomains in the C-terminal half of hTAF1 bind to acetylated histones (18, 22). TAF1 proteins from higher eukaryotes align with hTAF1 throughout the entire sequence, but Saccharomyces cerevisiae Taf1 corresponds to only the N-terminal half of hTAF1.
Yeast bromodomain factor 1 (Bdf1) was identified as a Taf7 (Taf67)-interacting protein, and this interaction mediates its binding to TFIID. Thus, it appears that Bdf1 corresponds to the C-terminal half of higher eukaryotic TAF1 (20). More recently, Bdf1 has also been found associated with the SWR-C complex, which is important for exchange of Htz1 in place of H2A (14, 16, 24). Bdf1 preferentially binds hyperacetylated histone H4 and is associated with chromatin (18, 22). Bdf1 is not essential for viability as long as cells contain the closely related Bdf2 protein, but cells cannot survive without at least one of the two bromodomain factors (21). After immunoprecipitation from yeast cells, Bdf1 can be phosphorylated by an unknown associated factor. Recombinant Bdf1 purified from bacteria also gets phosphorylated, but this activity is strongly stimulated by incubation with yeast extract (21). Although both Bdf1 and the C-terminal region of higher eukaryotic TAF1 are phosphorylated, the mechanism and significance of this modification are still unclear. It has been suggested that these proteins might autophosphorylate, but they have no obvious sequence similarity to known kinases. Here, we present results that further our understanding of the role of phosphorylation in Bdf1 function. We find that Bdf1 does not autophosphorylate but instead is phosphorylated by protein kinase CK2. There are two distinct regions of phosphorylation, and both are required for Bdf1 function in yeast. Furthermore, the C-terminal kinase domain (CTK) of hTAF1 is also an efficient substrate for CK2.
CK2 has many important functions in all eukaryotes, including regulation of cellular metabolism and proliferation. Basal transcription factors for both RNA Pol I (29) and Pol III (8, 10, 11) are substrates for CK2. Furthermore, CK2 copurifies with several chromatin-related complexes, including FACT (Spt16/Pob3) and Chd1 (17). CK2 also regulates the activity of Fcp1, the RNA Pol II CTD phosphatase (6, 25). Thus, CK2 may play a widespread role in regulating eukaryotic gene expression and chromatin structure. Bdf1, and by extension TFIID and SWR-C, is also a substrate of this essential kinase.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Yeast strains and methods. Yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. A new CK2 temperature-sensitive mutant was isolated using plasmid shuffling; pRS315-CKA1 was subjected to hydroxylamine mutagenesis and shuffled into YSB451 using medium containing 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA). Transformants were replica plated on yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium at permissive (30°C) and restrictive (37°C) temperatures. Plasmid linkage of the temperature sensitivity was confirmed by isolating the plasmid and repeating the shuffle. Mutations were identified by sequencing.
|
bdf2
strain carrying the BDF1 gene on a URA3 plasmid (YSB529) was transformed with pRS314 (an empty TRP1 vector) or pRS314 derivative plasmids expressing the BDF1 mutants. Transformants were selected, and serial dilutions were spotted onto plates containing 5-FOA to select against the wild-type BDF1 plasmid. The plates were incubated for 3 to 5 days at 30 or 37°C as indicated. The C-terminal and N-terminal tandem affinity purification (TAP)-tagged Bdf1 strains were constructed using PCR integration as described previously (7, 27). For the N-terminal tag, TAP Bdf1 (A) (5'-GTAAACAAGCTAAAAGGCGGTCGAATCTCAACGGCTCTGATAAACGTACGTAGAACAAAAGCTGGAGCTCAT-3') and TAP Bdf1 (B) (5'-TTATTACCATTGACATCCACATCGTTCTGTACGGGTGTGATATCGGTCATCTTATCGTCATCATCAAGTG-3') were used to amplify a tagging cassette from pBS1761 (7, 26) flanked by the Bdf1 sequence. The PCR product was transformed into YSB726, and colonies were selected on selective plates lacking tryptophan but containing 2% galactose and 0.05% glucose. This intermediate strain expressed TAP-tagged Bdf1 from an integrated GAL1 promoter. This promoter and the selectable marker were removed by transforming cells with pBS1776 (7, 26) expressing Cre recombinase. The final strain (YSB930) expressed the tagged Bdf1 from its own promoter. The C-terminal tag was also produced by PCR and integration into the W303 background as described elsewhere (7).
The HA-tagged CKA2 yeast strain (YSB941) was created by PCR amplifying an HA tagging cassette using primers CKA2-5'HA (5'-GCAAAGGAGGCTATGGATCATAAGTTTTTCAAAACGAAGTTTGAATACCCATATGACGTTCCAGAC-3') and CKA2-3'HA (5'-GGAAATCAGTGGTGGAAAAAGAATTGCCTTGCTAAGAGTATTGTTGTCTACGACTCACTATAGGGCG-3') and pKL-TRP-HA3 (13) as a template. The PCR product was transformed into YSB930, and transformants were selected on tryptophan-lacking medium. Incorporation of TAP and HA tags was confirmed by immunoblotting with the appropriate antibodies.
Protein preparation.
All GST-Bdf1 and GST-hTAF1 proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli DH5
cells. Cells were grown to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.3 at 30°C, induced with 0.1 mM isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside, and further grown at room temperature overnight. Cells were suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 5% sucrose, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), lysed by sonication, and subsequently centrifuged at 14,000 x g at 4°C for 20 min to remove cell debris. The clarified supernatants were stored at 80°C until they were used for phosphorylation assays.
For TAP-tagged protein purification, 4 liters of cells was grown in YPD at 30°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 1.5. Preparation of yeast whole-cell extracts and purification of TAP-tagged Bdf1 were performed essentially as described previously (17, 27) with minor modifications. The BDF1-associated proteins were electrophoresed at 10 mA in a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-10% polyacrylamide gel and silver stained. Protein bands with no corresponding band in a control from an untagged strain were excised from the gel, reduced, alkylated, and subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion. The resulting peptides were then purified and identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry with a PerSeptive DE STR instrument. Measured monoisotopic mass values were used to search a National Center for Biotechnology Information S. cerevisiae database with the Profound program.
In vitro Bdf1 phosphorylation assay.
Bdf1 phosphorylation assays were performed utilizing a minor modification of a method described previously (21). Cleared E. coli lysates containing roughly equal amounts (about 100 ng) of recombinant GST-Bdf1 were incubated with glutathione-agarose beads (Sigma) at 4°C for 1 h on a rotator. Beads were washed three times with 0.1HGPEDN (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 10% glycerol, 100 mM potassium acetate, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.01% NP-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Beads carrying GST-Bdf1 were incubated with 500 µg of yeast whole-cell extract at 4°C overnight on a rotator. The beads were extensively washed three times with 0.1HGPEDN, and then reactions were carried out in phosphorylation buffer (20 mM HEPES-KOH at pH 7.5, 100 mM potassium acetate, 7.5 mM magnesium acetate, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 2% glycerol) and 0.1 µCi of [
-32P]ATP or [
-32P]GTP as indicated. Reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Bound proteins were eluted by adding SDS sample buffer and boiling. Released proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). After staining with Coomassie brilliant blue R250, gels were dried and subjected to autoradiography.
Phospho-amino acid analysis.
Two GST-Bdf1 fusion proteins (Bdf1 amino acids [aa] 453 to 686 and aa 1 to 29 and 421 to 452) were separately phosphorylated using [
-32P]ATP after yeast extract incubation and repurification as described above. Labeled GST-Bdf1 derivatives were resolved by SDS-PAGE, located in the wet gel by autoradiography, excised, eluted, oxidized with performic acid, and hydrolyzed with 6 N HCl at 100°C for 4 h (1). The samples were then lyophilized in water and resuspended in 2 µl of phospho-amino acid markers containing a mixture of phosphoserine, phosphotyrosine, and phosphothreonine. Samples and each marker were spotted on a cellulose thin-layer chromatography plate (J. T. Baker), dried, and then resolved by electrophoresis. After staining markers with ninhydrin, labeled phospho-amino acids were detected by autoradiography.
Protein binding assay. For TFIID or CK2 binding assays, a series of GST-Bdf1 derivatives were immobilized on glutathione-agarose beads and then incubated overnight at 4°C on a rotator with 500 µg of yeast whole-cell extract from either YSB634 (HA-tagged Taf7) or YSB941 (HA-tagged Cka2). The beads were extensively washed with 0.1HGPEDN, and bound proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Bound proteins were detected by immunoblotting using HA antibody (12CA5).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
strain (data not shown), indicating that they retain some functions of Bdf1. However, neither deletion could support viability in a bdf1
bdf2
strain (Fig. 3). This pattern of complementation is similar to several Bdf1 bromodomain mutants, which can suppress the bdf1
temperature sensitivity but cannot support viability on their own (22). These results suggest that Bdf2 can substitute for the phosphorylation-dependent function of Bdf1. We note that Bdf2 is also phosphorylated (O. Matangkasombut and S. Buratowski, unpublished data; also, see below).
|
|
bdf2
strain, further deletion to amino acid 660 inhibited both functions (Fig. 5). Therefore, residues 660 to 679 contain the major sites of phosphorylation in Bdf1, and this region is essential for full Bdf1 function in vivo.
|
|
IPR
CPR) could not. Therefore, the association between Bdf1 and CK2 occurs via the same regions of Bdf1 that are phosphorylated by CK2. It is interesting that both the IPR and CPR contain sites related to the CK2 target consensus sequence, i.e., serines followed by acidic residues.
To determine whether the associated CK2 was responsible for Bdf1 phosphorylation, we constructed a temperature-sensitive cka1 mutant strain by hydroxylamine mutagenesis and plasmid shuffling. DNA sequencing of the protein coding region showed that the mutant had a single substitution: glycine 57 to aspartate (GGT
GAT). We also used the cka2-8 temperature-sensitive strain (provided by Clairborne Glover III [9]). It should be noted that these extracts were prepared from cells grown at the permissive temperature and the CK2 enzymes in these mutants are already partially defective at this temperature. Endogenous Bdf1 was phosphorylated in immunoprecipitates from wild-type extracts. Immunoprecipitates from the CK2 mutant strains contained Bdf1 (as assayed by immunoblotting [data not shown]), but it was not phosphorylated when labeled ATP was added (Fig. 7). Unlike many kinases, CK2 can use either ATP or GTP as a phosphate donor. An in vitro kinase assay using [
-32P]GTP showed that Bdf1 was phosphorylated at levels similar to that of reactions using [
-32P]ATP, and this phosphorylation was also lost in the CK2 mutant extracts (Fig. 7).
|
-32P]GTP gave the same result. In contrast, GST-CTD was phosphorylated even in the CK2 mutants, and this phosphorylation was specific for ATP. All of these results suggest that CK2 specifically phosphorylates Bdf1 and Bdf2. The C-terminal region of hTAF1 can also be phosphorylated by CK2. It has been reported that mammalian and Drosophila TAF1 have two kinase domains at the N and C termini that can mediate autophosphorylation (5) (Fig. 8A). Our results suggest that Bdf1, the likely yeast homologue of the TAF1 CTK domain, does not autophosphorylate but instead is phosphorylated by CK2. So far, there are no reports of yeast Taf1 being phosphorylated. It is interesting that the recombinant hTAF1 used in those other studies (5) was expressed using baculovirus in Sf9 cells, a eukaryotic cell line that would contain the highly conserved CK2. Furthermore, the C-terminal region of TAF1 from higher eukaryotes contains acidic regions with serines that are predicted to be CK2 phosphorylation sites. To compare the phosphorylation of hTAF1 and Bdf1 under the same conditions, we expressed GST-hTAF1 fusion proteins in E. coli, as was done for recombinant Bdf1. GST-NTK (hTAF1 N-terminal kinase domain) and GST-CTK (hTAF1 CTK domain) were incubated with yeast whole-cell extracts from wild-type or CK2 mutant yeast strains (Fig. 8B). The proteins were then repurified, and kinase assays were carried out as described above. GST-CTK was phosphorylated strongly in wild-type yeast extract and only very weakly in the cka2 mutant extract. Furthermore, GST-CTK did not show any autophosphorylation. No GST-NTK phosphorylation was observed in this assay.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously showed that Bdf1 is phosphorylated (21). Here, we mapped two phosphorylated regions of Bdf1 and found that the phosphorylation sites are necessary for Bdf1 function in vivo. Although there were some suspicions that Bdf1 could autophosphorylate, we instead found that Bdf1 was phosphorylated by the kinase CK2. CK2 was tightly associated with Bdf1 in yeast extracts, and Bdf1 phosphorylation was drastically reduced in CK2 mutant extracts (Fig. 6 and 7). It was also found that the C-terminal region of hTAF1, which corresponds to Bdf1 in yeast TFIID, could also be phosphorylated by CK2 (Fig. 8). It remains to be seen whether mammalian TAF1 is a CK2 substrate in vivo.
Interestingly, deletion mutants lacking either phosphorylated region can complement the temperature sensitivity of a bdf1
strain but cannot support viability in a bdf1
bdf2
strain (Fig. 3 and data not shown). Furthermore, we also found that the C-terminal region of Bdf1 (aa 453 to 626) is sufficient for suppressing the mutant phenotype of bdf1
(data not shown). These findings suggest that Bdf2, which is also phosphorylated by CK2 (Fig. 7), can substitute for the phosphorylation-dependent Bdf1 function as well as the function of the Bdf1 bromodomains. Moreover, the Bdf1 C-terminal region must supply additional functions that are not phosphorylation dependent and that cannot be supplied by Bdf2. Although the relationship between Bdf1 and Bdf2 is still unclear, they may form a complex. TAP-tagged purification of Bdf2 copurifies Bdf1 (7) and vice versa (see above). Comparison of Bdf1 from several yeast species shows that the bromodomains, Taf7 binding domain, CPR, and IPR are conserved (data not shown).
CK2 is widely conserved among eukaryotic species, including plants, humans, yeasts, and Caenorhabditis elegans. Much evidence suggests that it has important functions in cellular regulation and proliferation (19, 23). Furthermore, it has recently been reported that CK2 is involved in transcription of Pol I- and Pol III-dependent genes (8, 29). CK2 copurifies with several chromatin-related complexes and Fcp1, the RNA Pol II CTD phosphatase (6, 25). In addition, CK2 appears central to many of the mechanisms that protect the cell against stress.
What is the role of Bdf1 phosphorylation by CK2? We tested whether Bdf1 phosphorylation could affect TFIID complex stability, but Taf1, Taf7, and TBP still associated with Bdf1 lacking both phosphorylated regions (Fig. 1A and data not shown). Therefore, phosphorylation is not required for TFIID association, but we cannot rule out that it instead negatively regulates the interaction. Phosphorylation may regulate other Bdf1 activities or cellular localization. We have preliminary results that suggest in vitro binding of histones does not require Bdf1 phosphorylation (Sawa, unpublished). Recently, we and others discovered that Bdf1 is associated with another chromatin-related complex known as SWR-C (16, 24). This complex is necessary for the placement of histone H2A.Z (Htz1 in yeast) into chromatin, apparently by exchanging Htz1 for H2A. We are currently testing the role of Bdf1 in this complex and whether phosphorylation is necessary for this activity. It also remains possible that Bdf1 is associated with other complexes in a phosphorylation-regulated manner.
Bdf1 has a domain structure similar to that of other members of the BET family (20). Higher eukaryotic genomes sequenced to date all contain multiple BET members, suggesting that their functions are conserved and important. Members of this family contain two bromodomains and a C-terminal ET domain that is characterized by a high percentage of serines and charged residues. The Bdf1 CPR overlaps the ET domain. Phosphorylation of the ET domain may be a common feature of the BET proteins. A mammalian BET protein has been shown to be highly phosphorylated in response to mitogens (3). Like hTAF1, this protein has been proposed to have autokinase activity despite limited sequence similarity to known kinases. Another mammalian BET family member has been implicated in cell cycle regulation of chromosome structure (reference 4 and references therein). It will be interesting to determine whether phosphorylation of BET proteins is used as a mechanism for coupling signal transduction and cell cycle pathways to chromatin and gene expression.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
C.S. was a recipient of a Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. S.B. is a Scholar of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. This work was supported by grant GM46498 from the National Institutes of Health to S.B.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Chua, P., and G. S. Roeder. 1995. Bdf1, a yeast chromosomal protein required for sporulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3685-3696.[Abstract]
3. Denis, G. V., and M. R. Green. 1996. A novel, mitogen-activated nuclear kinase is related to a Drosophila developmental regulator. Genes Dev. 10:261-271.
4. Dey, A., F. Chitsaz, A. Abbasi, T. Misteli, and K. Ozato. 2003. The double bromodomain protein Brd4 binds to acetylated chromatin during interphase and mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:8758-8763.
5. Dikstein, R., S. Ruppert, and R. Tjian. 1996. TAFII250 is a bipartite protein kinase that phosphorylates the base transcription factor RAP74. Cell 84:781-790.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Friedl, E. M., W. S. Lane, H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and D. Reinberg. 2003. The C-terminal domain phosphatase and transcription elongation activities of FCP1 are regulated by phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:2328-2333.
7. Gavin, A. C., M. Bosche, R. Krause, P. Grandi, M. Marzioch, A. Bauer, J. Schultz, J. M. Rick, A. M. Michon, C. M. Cruciat, M. Remor, C. Hofert, M. Schelder, M. Brajenovic, H. Ruffner, A. Merino, K. Klein, M. Hudak, D. Dickson, T. Rudi, V. Gnau, A. Bauch, S. Bastuck, B. Huhse, C. Leutwein, M. A. Heurtier, R. R. Copley, A. Edelmann, E. Querfurth, V. Rybin, G. Drewes, M. Raida, T. Bouwmeester, P. Bork, B. Seraphin, B. Kuster, G. Neubauer, and G. Superti-Furga. 2002. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415:141-147.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Ghavidel, A., and M. C. Schultz. 2001. TATA binding protein-associated CK2 transduces DNA damage signals to the RNA polymerase III transcriptional machinery. Cell 106:575-584.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Hanna, D. E., A. Rethinaswamy, and C. V. Glover. 1995. Casein kinase II is required for cell cycle progression during G1 and G2/M in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 270:25905-25914.
10. Hu, P., S. Wu, and N. Hernandez. 2003. A minimal RNA polymerase III transcription system from human cells reveals positive and negative regulatory roles for CK2. Mol. Cell 12:699-709.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Johnston, I. M., S. J. Allison, J. P. Morton, L. Schramm, P. H. Scott, and R. J. White. 2002. CK2 forms a stable complex with TFIIIB and activates RNA polymerase III transcription in human cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:3757-3768.
12. Keogh, M. C., E. J. Cho, V. Podolny, and S. Buratowski. 2002. Kin28 is found within TFIIH and a Kin28-Ccl1-Tfb3 trimer complex with differential sensitivities to T-loop phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:1288-1297.
13. Keogh, M. C., V. Podolny, and S. Buratowski. 2003. Bur1 kinase is required for efficient transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:7005-7018.
14. Kobor M. S., S. Venkatasubrahmanyam, M. D. Meneghini, J. W. Gin, J. L. Jennings, A. J. Link, H. D. Madhani, and J. Rine. 2004. A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A.Z into euchromatin. PLoS Biol. 2:E131. [Online.] http://www.plosbiology.org.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Komarnitsky, P., E. J. Cho, and S. Buratowski. 2000. Different phosphorylated forms of RNA polymerase II and associated mRNA processing factors during transcription. Genes Dev. 14:2452-2460.
16. Krogan, N. J., M. C. Keogh, N. Datta, C. Sawa, O. W. Ryan, H. Ding, R. A. Haw, J. Pootoolal, A. Tong, V. Canadien, D. P. Richards, X. Wu, A. Emili, T. R. Hughes, S. Buratowski, and J. F. Greenblatt. 2003. A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1. Mol. Cell 12:1565-1576.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Krogan, N. J., M. Kim, S. H. Ahn, G. Zhong, M. S. Kobor, G. Cagney, A. Emili, A. Shilatifard, S. Buratowski, and J. F. Greenblatt. 2002. RNA polymerase II elongation factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a targeted proteomics approach. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:6979-6992.
18. Ladurner, A. G., C. Inouye, R. Jain, and R. Tjian. 2003. Bromodomains mediate an acetyl-histone encoded antisilencing function at heterochromatin boundaries. Mol. Cell 11:365-376.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Litchfield, D. W. 2003. Protein kinase CK2: structure, regulation and role in cellular decisions of life and death. Biochem. J. 369:1-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Lygerou, Z., C. Conesa, P. Lesage, R. N. Swanson, A. Ruet, M. Carlson, A. Sentenac, and B. Seraphin. 1994. The yeast BDF1 gene encodes a transcription factor involved in the expression of a broad class of genes including snRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:5332-5340.
21. Matangkasombut, O., R. M. Buratowski, N. W. Swilling, and S. Buratowski. 2000. Bromodomain factor 1 corresponds to a missing piece of yeast TFIID. Genes Dev. 14:951-962.
22. Matangkasombut, O., and S. Buratowski. 2003. Different sensitivities of bromodomain factors 1 and 2 to histone H4 acetylation. Mol. Cell 11:353-363.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Meggio, F., and L. A. Pinna. 2003. One-thousand-and-one substrates of protein kinase CK2? FASEB J. 17:349-368.
24. Mizuguchi, G., X. Shen, J. Landry, W. H. Wu, S. Sen, and C. Wu. 2004. ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 303:343-348.
25. Palancade, B., M. F. Dubois, and O. Bensaude. 2002. FCP1 phosphorylation by casein kinase 2 enhances binding to TFIIF and RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain phosphatase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 277:36061-36067.
26. Pugh, B. F. 2000. Control of gene expression through regulation of the TATA-binding protein. Gene 255:1-14.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Puig, O., F. Caspary, G. Rigaut, B. Rutz, E. Bouveret, E. Bragado-Nilsson, M. Wilm, and B. Seraphin. 2001. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24:218-229.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Ranish, J. A., E. C. Yi, D. M. Leslie, S. O. Purvine, D. R. Goodlett, J. Eng, and R. Aebersold. 2003. The study of macromolecular complexes by quantitative proteomics. Nat. Genet. 33:349-355.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Saez-Vasquez, J., M. Meissner, and C. S. Pikaard. 2001. RNA polymerase I holoenzyme-promoter complexes include an associated CK2-like protein kinase. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:449-459.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Wassarman, D. A., and F. Sauer. 2001. TAF(II)250: a transcription toolbox. J. Cell Sci. 114:2895-2902.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|