Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2004, p. 6324-6337, Vol. 24, No. 14
0270-7306/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.14.6324-6337.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Carine Froment,2 Jacqueline Noaillac-Depeyre,1 Bernard Monsarrat,2 Michèle Caizergues-Ferrer,1 and Yves Henry1*
Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Eucaryote, UMR5099 CNRS-Université Paul Sabatier, IFR 109, 31062 Toulouse cedex 04,1 Plate-forme protéomique, Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale (CNRS UMR 5089), 31077 Toulouse cedex, France2
Received 7 January 2004/ Returned for modification 8 February 2004/ Accepted 9 April 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The early pre-rRNA endonucleolytic cleavages at sites A0 and A1 occur within maturing 90S preribosomal particles, the precise composition of which still remains to be defined. It has been proposed that these cleavages release a substantial number of factors that remain bound to the cleaved off 5' external transcribed spacer fragments (82). This may, at least in part, explain why the pre-40S particles that evolve following pre-rRNA cleavage at site A2 have lost most of the nonribosomal factors found in 90S particles. A2 cleavage also releases the first pre-60S particle. The composition of the pre-60S particles purified so far is radically different from that of the known 90S particles (5, 22, 37, 68, 80, 81). As they mature, pre-60S particles migrate from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm (60), and their content of nonribosomal factors becomes simpler (68, 81).
Translocation across the nuclear pores of export-competent pre-60S and pre-40S particles depends upon the Ran GTPase cycle and the export receptor Crm1p/Xpo1p that binds to the nuclear export signal (31, 35, 40, 65, 66). In the case of pre-60S particles, at least one link with Crm1p/Xpo1p is provided by the nuclear export signal-containing Nmd3p protein that interacts with large subunit ribosomal protein Rpl10p (31, 39, 40). Final maturation events take place in the cytoplasm to yield mature functional ribosomal subunits (24, 83, 96, 97).
Although we now have an overall idea of the succession of preribosomal particles, the fine details still need to be worked out. Concerning the early pre-60S pathway, for example, the picture remains blurred because our knowledge is derived from purification experiments performed with bait proteins that interact with several distinct pre-rRNAs that are derived from one another. Hence, so far mostly rather broad mixtures of pre-60S particles have probably been purified.
In this study, we characterized an as yet unknown nucleolar factor, Npa1p (for nucleolar preribosomal-associated), that interacts predominantly with the 27SA2 pre-rRNA. Therefore, we propose that the pre-60S particles purified by using Npa1p as bait correspond to some of the earliest pre-60S particles.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains expressing Npa1p-TAP or Npa1p-ZZ used for the immunoprecipitation experiments, the immunolocalization by electron microscopy, and the analysis of the sedimentation profile of Npa1p on a glycerol gradient were produced as follows. Two gene cassettes flanked on the 5' side by the last 48 nucleotides of the NPA1 open reading frame and on the 3' side by a segment of the NPA1 terminator and containing either the TAP-tag (cassette 3) or only the ZZ-tag (cassette 4) sequence followed by a TRP1 marker from Kluyveromyces lactis were amplified by PCR by using plasmid pBS1479 (77) and oligonucleotides TAP-YKL014C/1 (5'-GCTAATATTATGGACAGAAGGTGATAGCGACAATGTTGTCAAGAGGCTACGTAAATCCATGGAAAAGAGAAG-3') and TAP-YKL014C/2 (5'-TTATACATTTCGCACATTATATAGAAAAGTGGACATTTAATTCTTCAAATCTTATTACGACTCACTATAGGG-3') (cassette 3) or oligonucleotides ZZ-YKL014C/1 (5'-GCTAATATTATGGACAGAAGGTGATAGCGACAATGTTGTCAAGAGGCTACGTAAAGAGCTCAAAACCGCGGC-3') and TAP-YKL014C/2 (cassette 4). Cassettes 3 and 4 were integrated into strain Y0341 (pra1-1 prb1-1 prc1-1 cps1-3
his3 leu2-3,112
ura3
trp1::LEU2) creating npa1::TAP and npa1::ZZ, strains respectively.
Strains expressing Krr1p-TAP or Ssf1p-TAP were constructed as described for Npa1p-TAP by using oligonucleotides TAP-Krr1/1 (5'-GCAAAAGATTTCATAGCTCCGGAAGAAGAAGCATACAAGCCAAACCAAAATTCCATGGAAAAGAGAAG-3'), TAP-KRR1/2 (5'-AATTTCTTTCACTTTACAAACATATCTAAGTAAACGAAATGTGTGTGTGTTTCTATACGACTCACTATAGGG-3'), Ssf1-TAP/1 (5'-ATGGTAGCGTACCAGAGGATCTAGATAGTGACTTATTTAGTGAGGTCGAATCCATGGAAAAGAGAAGA-3'), and Ssf1-TAP/2 (5'-TGCGTTGGTGGATAGCCAGGCTTAACTAAAATTTTCTTGGTACCGGAGAATACGACTCACTATAGGG-3').
A strain expressing Npa1p-green fluorescent protein (GFP) was constructed as previously described (58) by using plasmid pFA6a-GFP(S65T)-TRP1 and oligonucleotides YKL-GFP/1 (5'-GCTAATATTATGGACAGAAGGTGATAGCGACAATGTTGTCAAGAGGCTACGTAAACGGATCCCCGGGTTAATTAA-3') and YKL-GFP/2 (5'-TTATACATTTCGCACATTATATAGAAAAGTGGACATTTAATTCTTCAAATCTTATGAATTCGAGCTCGTTTAAAC-3'). ThePCR product obtained was transformed into strain Y0341, producing strain Y0341-npa1::GFP.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains were grown either in YP medium (1% yeast extract, 1% peptone) supplemented with either 2% galactose, 2% raffinose, 2% sucrose or 2% glucose as carbon sources or in YNB medium [0.17% yeast nitrogen base, 0.5% (NH4)2SO4] supplemented with 2% galactose, 2% raffinose, 2% sucrose, and the required amino acids.
Fluorescence microscopy and immunoelectron microscopy. Y0341-npa1::GFP cells were treated as previously described (10). Detection of Npa1p-ZZ by immunoelectron microscopy was performed as described by Henras et al. (38).
Immunoprecipitations. Total cellular extracts were produced from strains expressing either Npa1p-ZZ, Npa1p-TAP, Krr1p-TAP, Ssf1p-TAP, or no tagged protein. Cells frozen in liquid nitrogen were broken with dry ice in a kitchen blender (Osterizer). Aliquots of broken cell powder corresponding to 2 x 1010 cells were resuspended in 2 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 5 mM MgAc, 0.2% Triton X-100, 200 mM potassium acetate (KAc), 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 0.5 U of RNasin (Promega) per µl, and protease inhibitors. Extracts were clarified by centrifuging for 10 min at 16,000 x g in a microcentrifuge (Eppendorf 5415D).
For protein analysis, aliquots of extracts corresponding to 200 mg of proteins were added to 200 µl of immunoglobulin G (IgG)-Sepharose beads fast flow (Amersham Biosciences) in a 5-ml final volume of a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 5 mM MgAc, 0.2% Triton X-100, 200 mM KAc, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 U of RNasin (Promega) per µl, and protease inhibitors. Immunoprecipitation was performed at 4°C for 1 h and 30 min on a shaking table. Beads were then washed five times with 10 ml of the buffer used for the immunoprecipitation without RNasin (ice cold), once with 10 ml of TEV cleavage buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 200 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT) and incubated for 2 h at 16°C with 100 U of TEV enzyme (Invitrogen) in 1 ml of TEV cleavage buffer. Eluted proteins were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid, separated on 8, 12, and 15% polyacrylamide-sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gels, and identified by mass spectrometry (MS).
For RNA analysis, aliquots of extracts corresponding to 12 mg of proteins were added to 50 µl of IgG-Sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences) in a 1-ml final volume of a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 5 mM MgAc, 0.2% Triton X-100, 200 mM KAc, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 U of RNasin (Promega) per µl, and protease inhibitors. Immunoprecipitation was performed at 4°C for 1 h and 30 min on a shaking table. Beads were then washed seven times with 1 ml of the buffer used for the immunoprecipitation (ice cold). A total of 160 µl of 4 M guanidinium isothiocyanate solution, 4 µl of glycogen, 80 µl of 100 mM NaAc (pH 5), 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA solution, 120 µl of phenol, and 120 µl of chloroform was added to the beads. The samples were thoroughly mixed, incubated for 5 min at 65°C, and centrifuged for 5 min at 4°C and 16,000 x g in a microcentrifuge (Eppendorf 5415D). The aqueous phases were recovered, mixed with 120 µl of phenol and 120 µl of chloroform, and the samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 4°C and 16,000 x g in a microcentrifuge (Eppendorf 5415D). RNAs from the aqueous phases were then precipitated with ethanol.
MS. Coomassie blue-stained bands were subjected to in-gel tryptic digestion by using modified porcine trypsin (Promega). The tryptic digests were analyzed by online capillary high-performance liquid chromatography (LC Packings, Dionex, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) coupled to a nanospray LCQ Deca ion trap mass spectrometer (ThermoFinnigan, San Jose, Calif.). Peptides were separated onto a PepMap C18 column (internal diameter, 75 µm; length, 15 cm) (LC Packings) after loading onto a PepMap C18 precolumn (internal diameter, 300 µm; length, 5 mm). The flow rate was set at 150 nl/min. Peptides were eluted by using a 0 to 40% linear gradient of solvent B for 40 min (solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in 5% acetonitrile, and solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in 90% acetonotrile). The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion mode at a needle voltage of 1.9 kV and a capillary voltage of 30 V. Data acquisition was performed in a data-dependent mode consisting of, alternatively in a single run, a full-scan MS over the range m/z 370 to 2,000 and a full-scan tandem MS (MS/MS) in an exclusion dynamic mode. MS/MS data were acquired by using a three m/z unit isolation window and a relative collision energy of 35%. The SEQUEST Browser software was used for protein identification by searching against S. cerevisiae entries from SwissProt with MS/MS spectra.
Fractionation of yeast extract on glycerol gradient. A total cellular extract was prepared as described in "Immunoprecipitations" from the strain expressing Npa1p-ZZ. A total of 500 µl of extract corresponding to 5 mg of proteins was loaded on a 10 to 30% glycerol gradient. Preparation of the gradient, loading of the extract, centrifugation, and collection of fractions were performed as described previously (10).
Western analysis. Proteins from total extracts produced as previously described (17) or obtained from gradient fractions after trichloroacetic acid precipitation or from immunoprecipitated pellets were separated on 12% polyacrylamide-SDS gels and transferred to Hybond-C extra membranes (Amersham Biosciences). ZZ-tagged Npa1p, Gar1p, and Nhp2p and ribosomal proteins L3 and S8 were detected as described elsewhere (17).
RNA extractions, Northern hybridizations, and primer extensions. RNA extractions were performed as described by Tollervey and Mattaj (88). RNA fractionations by agarose or polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were performed as described by Henras et al. (38). Primer extensions were performed as described previously (10).
Pre-rRNA precursors, mature rRNAs, and various small RNAs were analyzed by Northern hybridization or primer extensions by using 32P-labeled oligodeoxynucleotide probes. Sequences of antisense oligonucleotides used to detect these RNAs have been reported previously (16, 17, 38, 75), except oligonucleotides to detect the following: 25.5S (5'-TTAAGAACATTGTTCGCCTA-3'), 6S (5'-TGAGAAGGAAATGACGCT-3'), 5.8S+30 (5'-ACTCACTACCAAACAGAATG-3'), snR3 (5'-CGAATAAGACCGAGTGTTCA-3'), snR35 (5'-CCGATGGACTTGACGCTTATACC-3'), snR52 (5'-GTATCAGAGATTGTTCACGC-3'), snR55 (5'-ATGGTGATGCATGATGTAATCC-3'), snR69 (5'-TTTATAGCATTGTCACTAAG-3'), snR70 (5'-CATCAATTCTCCACTAAAGAAC-3'), and snR73 (5'-GGCGAAATATCATCAAAGTT-3'). Blots were hybridized with 5' end-labeled oligonucleotide probes and washed as described previously (38).
Pulse-chase analyses.
Cells were grown to an optical density of
0.4 in rich (YP) media and were then shifted to minimal (YNB) media for 4 h. To 9-ml samples, 450 µCi [3H]methyl-methionine was added. After 3 min of labeling, 0.9 ml of 0.1 M methionine was added, and 1-ml samples were collected at 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 90, and 120 min following the addition of cold methionine.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
Npa1p is a component of 27SA2-containing preribosomal particles. To assess whether Npa1p is present within preribosomal particles, we first analyzed the sedimentation profile of Npa1p-ZZ on a glycerol gradient. The strain used for these experiments expresses Npa1p-ZZ from the endogenous NPA1 promoter. Strikingly, a significant fraction of Npa1p-ZZ cosediments with RNA components of pre-60S ribosomal particles (Fig. 6A). Another significant fraction of Npa1p-ZZ sediments close to the top of the gradient in fractions 4 to 6. In comparison, far less Npa1p-ZZ is present within gradient fractions containing 90S preribosomal particles. To establish whether Npa1p does associate with pre-rRNA(s) found in pre-60S ribosomal particles and, if so, which pre-rRNA(s), Npa1p-ZZ was precipitated from yeast whole-cell extracts, and coprecipitating RNAs were analyzed by Northern blotting (Fig. 6B) and primer extension experiments (Fig. 6C). By far the most efficiently coprecipitating pre-rRNA is the 27SA2 molecule.
|
|
|
Npa1p is associated with a subset of C/D and H/ACA snoRNAs involved in the modification of rRNA residues in the vicinity of the peptidyl transferase center. In addition to being associated with factors required for the production of large subunit rRNAs, Npa1p is also associated with H/ACA and C/D snoRNP proteins (Table 1). This finding is consistent with the results of Gavin et al. (34), who reported that Npa1p is associated with Nhp2p-TAP and Gar1p-TAP (see Results). Moreover, we have independently confirmed that Npa1p can be coimmunoprecipitated from cell extracts by using anti-Nhp2p antibodies (data not shown). These data suggest that a Npa1p-containing preribosomal particle(s) contains at least a subset of H/ACA and C/D snoRNPs. To assess whether this is the case, the nature of small RNAs coprecipitated with Npa1p-TAP was determined by Northern blot analysis (Fig. 7). We also determined by the same approach the small RNAs coprecipitated with Krr1p-TAP and Ssf1p-TAP. Krr1p is a component of the 90S preribosomal particle (36) (Fig. 7) while Ssf1p is associated mostly with the 27SB pre-rRNAs and to a lesser extent with the 27SA2 pre-rRNA (22) (Fig. 7).
|
Our results suggest that a subset of the H/ACA and C/D snoRNPs involved in nucleotide modifications can be present within pre-60S ribosomal particles. These snoRNPs may sometimes perform their nucleotide modification function within these pre-60S ribosomal particles and/or their presence within pre-60S particles may be needed for other functions such as promoting proper folding of preribosomal RNAs.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At least two nucleolar factors needed for large subunit rRNA synthesis, Nop7p and Noc3p, are required for the initiation of DNA replication (19, 108). Moreover, four other components of pre-60S particles, Nog1p, Nop5p, Nsa3p, and Rpf2p, seem to be associated with the Orc1p protein that binds to the origins of DNA replication (19). Whether this is a property shared by many other protein components of pre-60S particles remains an intriguing possibility. Npa1p may not be a component of the complex that assembles on the origins of DNA replication, because we failed to detect Npa1p in complexes purified when TAP-tagged Orc1p or Mcm5p was used as bait (data not shown). However, the fact that Npa1p interacts with Cdc28p in a double-hybrid assay (95) may indicate that Cdc28p phosphorylates Npa1p (which contains consensus Cdc28p phosphorylation sites) in a cell cycle-dependent manner, as has been shown for several proteins required for DNA replication (47, 67). Determining whether Npa1p is indeed phosphorylated by Cdc28p, and, if so, at what stage of the cell cycle and for what purpose constitutes a challenge for future research.
Composition and localization of 27SA2-containing pre-60S particles. Information concerning the protein composition of pre-60S particles has been gathered from TAP experiments by using proteins known to be required for 60S ribosomal subunit formation as baits (5, 22, 37, 68, 80, 81). The proteomic data resulting from these experiments, although rich and useful, are difficult to interpret for two main reasons. The first is that these data are most probably always incomplete (sometimes significantly so) due to the fact that some factors may be lost during the purification procedure and/or escape detection by MS. We know, for example, that the box H/ACA snoRNP proteins Gar1p and Nop10p as well as the box C/D protein Snu13p must feature among the Npa1p-associated proteins, although we failed to detect them. The second reason is that most TAP experiments have so far been conducted by using bait proteins that interact strongly with several different pre-rRNAs that stand in precursor-product relationships. Therefore, the panels of proteins obtained probably correspond to the composition of a rather broad spectrum of pre-60S particles. From these lists, it is difficult to derive the precise timing of association and dissociation of any given factor. Defining or purifying a given pre-60S particle is probably impossible, since pre-60S particles may undergo continual changes in conformation and protein content. However, we could improve the resolution of our models if we knew the partners of bait proteins that interact mainly with only one pre-rRNA.
In this study, we have identified the protein partners of Npa1p. Npa1p fulfills the above criterion since it is predominantly associated with the 27SA2 pre-rRNA at steady state, although it probably also transiently interacts with late 90S particles (see below). We have compared the panels of proteins associated with Npa1p with those associated with other bait proteins that also accumulate in the nucleolus and are present in 27SA2-containing particles, namely Nsa3p, Ssf1p, and Nop7p. In contrast to Npa1p, Nsa3p and Ssf1p partition between 27SA2, 27SB, and 7S-containing particles (22, 68). Nop7p is also present in these three types of particles although it is clearly much more abundant in the latter two than in the former (37). From our data and the above-mentioned comparison, we can draw the following conclusions. It is most probable that all 25 Npa1p-associated proteins listed in Table 1 known to be required for 60S ribosomal subunit biogenesis or to be present in pre-60S particles are components of 27SA2-containing particles. Strikingly, our results strongly suggest that 27SA2-containing particles are associated with at least 8 different putative RNA-dependent helicases (Table 1), underscoring the highly complex nature of conformational rearrangements that are likely to take place immediately after A2 cleavage. Two of these putative helicases, Dbp6p and Dbp9p, are most probably present at some stage together in 27SA2-containing preribosomal complexes because a yeast two-hybrid assay performed with these proteins is positive (13). We were surprised to find Prp43p, a putative helicase involved in the release of the lariat-intron from the spliceosome (3, 59), among the factors associated with Npa1p. Prp43p is certainly not a contaminant for the following reasons. It was also found associated with Nsa3p (68), it accumulates in the nucleolus (45), and its human orthologue is found both in speckles and in the nucleolus (2, 29). Oddly, although Nsa3p and Nop7p were purified with tagged Npa1p, this protein was not detected in TAP experiments that used these former two proteins as baits. Such discrepancies have already been observed between the results of TAP experiments with Ssf1p and Nop7p as baits, for example (see discussion in reference 22), and most probably are due to experimental shortcomings (see above). Npa1p was also not detected in one TAP experiment performed with Ssf1p (22). However, Ssf1p was also not detected among the Npa1p-TAP-associated proteins (this study). This result, too, may be due to experimental problems since in the large-scale TAP study, Npa1p was identified among the proteins interacting with Ssf1p-TAP (34).
Interestingly, Npa1p is also associated with a small subset of proteins that are thought to be present (Nsr1p) or have been detected in 90S particles (36, 82). One of these, Rrp5p, would be expected to be present in 27SA2-containing pre-60S particles, since it is required not only for A0, A1, and A2 cleavages and 40S subunit synthesis but also for A3 cleavage (99). Nsr1p, Kre33p, Enp2p, Kri1p, and Utp9p, on the other hand, have never been reported to be required for some aspect of 60S ribosomal subunit synthesis. These proteins could, nevertheless, be present in Npa1p-containing pre-60S particles. Another possibility is that Npa1p is recruited to late 90S preribosomes (i.e., containing the 32S pre-rRNA) just prior to A2 cleavage by a very transient interaction with a subset of late 90S proteins, maybe Nsr1p, Kre33p, Enp2p, Kri1p, and/or Utp9p. This possibility would be compatible with the observation that a fraction of Npa1p sediments above the 27SA2-27SB peak on a glycerol gradient. However, we have never been able to detect the 32S pre-rRNA in the material precipitated with Npa1p (data not shown).
The Nsa3p protein has also been found associated with a subset of 90S proteins (68). Except for Rrp5p, these (Nop14p, Rrp8p, Rrp9p, and Utp10p) are different from the 90S proteins found interacting with Npa1p. Hence, Nsa3p could be recruited to 90S preribosomal particles by transiently interacting with a different subset of late 90S proteins. More surprising is the observation that seven proteins (Nop8p, Fpr3p/Nip46p, Dbp3p, Dbp6p, Dbp7p, Dbp9p, and Nhp2p) have been found associated with Npa1p and not with Nsa3p. Indeed, as just discussed, Nsa3p probably associates with preribosomal particles prior to A2 cleavage, and we would therefore predict that it is associated with all 27SA2-containing particles since it interacts with 27SA2, 27SB, 7S, and 25S and is still detected in the export-competent Arx1p-containing pre-60S particles. One explanation for this discrepancy could be that these seven proteins are more loosely bound to preribosomal complexes and could have dissociated during the second affinity chromatography of the Nsa3p TAP, which was not employed during our purification of tagged Npa1p.
A high-resolution study of Npa1p localization in the nucleolus by electron microscopy shows that this protein is present immediately adjacent to the dense fibrillar component of the nucleolus. This suggests that at least a subset of 27SA2-containing pre-60S ribosomal particles is located adjacent to the dense fibrillar component. This is fully consistent with the general view that pre-rRNA transcription takes place at the boundary between the fibrillar centers and the dense fibrillar component and that the very early processing steps occurring within 90S particles take place inside the dense fibrillar component (reviewed in reference 32). Our hypothesis also fits well with the finding that the Rlp7p protein which associates with slightly more mature pre-60S particles than Npa1p is found within the granular component (32).
Modifying snoRNPs can associate with Npa1p, a marker protein of early pre-60S particles. The timing of 2'-O-ribose methylations of rRNAs in yeast was first studied by RNase fingerprinting of pre-rRNAs (11). All 2'-O-methyl groups were detected on what was then known as the 37S pre-rRNA (i.e., 35S pre-rRNA), except those added on U2918 and G2919 in the peptidyl transferase center which appear later on the "29S" pre-rRNA (i.e., 27S pre-rRNA; the distinction between various 27S species was not made at the time). Recently, Bonnerot and colleagues have shown that the late U2918 methylation requires the presence of either the Spb1p methyltransferase or the snR52 snoRNA, strongly suggesting that this modification is carried out either by Spb1p or the C/D snoRNP containing snR52 (9). This is consistent with our finding that both Spb1p and snR52 are associated with Npa1p, which we believe reflects their common presence in early 27SA2-containing pre-60S particles. Strikingly, a subset of other C/D as well as H/ACA snoRNAs involved in the modification of the peptidyl transferase center are also very efficiently coprecipitated with Npa1p, suggesting that the corresponding snoRNPs might be present within early pre-60S particles. The efficiency with which some of these RNAs, in particular snR37 and snR42, are coprecipitated with Npa1p is comparable to the efficiency with which 27SA2 pre-rRNA is coprecipitated. Hence, the coprecipitation data of snR37 and snR42 with Npa1p cannot be attributed to the extremely weak interaction of that protein with the 35S pre-rRNA. The presence of modifying snoRNPs in pre-60S particles may reflect the fact that some modifications are introduced at the 27S stage only (as seems to be the case for the methylations of U2918 and G2919) or that there can be some flexibility in the timing of the modifications relative to the cleavage events, i.e., modification at a given site may occur at the 35S stage on some transcripts and at a later stage on others, as has been demonstrated in Xenopus oocytes (105). In addition, some snoRNPs might be required in early pre-60S particles to promote proper folding of 27SA2 pre-rRNA.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
C.D. is a recipient of a postgraduate fellowship from the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC). This work was supported by the CNRS, the Université Paul Sabatier, and grants from La Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Equipe Labelisée) and the ACI program of the Ministère Délégué à la Recherche et aux Nouvelles Technologies to M.C.-F and from the Région Midi-Pyréneés and the Génopole Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées to B.M.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
We dedicate this work to the memory of Bernard Simon, Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Eucaryote du CNRS. ![]()
Present address: Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, United Kingdom. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Andersen, J. S., C. E. Lyon, A. H. Fox, A. K. Leung, Y. W. Lam, H. Steen, M. Mann, and A. I. Lamond. 2002. Directed proteomic analysis of the human nucleolus. Curr. Biol. 12:1-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Arenas, J. E., and J. N. Abelson. 1997. Prp43: an RNA helicase-like factor involved in spliceosome disassembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:11798-11802.
4. Bachellerie, J.-P., J. Cavaillé, and L.-H. Qu. 2000. Nucleotide modifications of eukaryotic rRNAs: the world of small nucleolar RNA guides revisited, p. 191-203. In R. A. Garrett, S. R. Douthwaite, A. Liljas, A. T. Matheson, P. B. Moore, and H. F. Noller (ed.), The ribosome: structure, function, antibiotic, and cellular interactions. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
5. Bassler, J., P. Grandi, O. Gadal, T. Lessmann, E. Petfalski, D. Tollervey, J. Lechner, and E. Hurt. 2001. Identification of a 60S preribosomal particle that is closely linked to nuclear export. Mol. Cell 8:517-529.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Beltrame, M., and D. Tollervey. 1995. Base pairing between U3 and the pre-ribosomal RNA is required for 18S rRNA synthesis. EMBO J. 14:4350-4356.[Medline]
7. Beltrame, M., and D. Tollervey. 1992. Identification and functional analysis of two U3 binding sites on yeast pre-ribosomal RNA. EMBO J. 11:1531-1542.[Medline]
8. Bergès, T., E. Petfalski, D. Tollervey, and E. C. Hurt. 1994. Synthetic lethality with fibrillarin identifies NOP77p, a nucleolar protein required for pre-rRNA processing and modification. EMBO J. 13:3136-3148.[Medline]
9. Bonnerot, C., L. Pintard, and G. Lutfalla. 2003. Functional redundancy of Spb1p and a snR52-dependent mechanism for the 2'-O-ribose methylation of a conserved rRNA position in yeast. Mol. Cell 12:1309-1315.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Bousquet-Antonelli, C., E. Vanrobays, J.-P. Gélugne, M. Caizergues-Ferrer, and Y. Henry. 2000. Rrp8p is a yeast nucleolar protein functionally linked to Gar1p and involved in pre-rRNA cleavage at site A2. RNA 6:826-843.[Abstract]
11. Brand, R. C., J. Klootwijk, T. J. M. Van Steenbergen, A. J. De Kok, and R. J. Planta. 1977. Secondary methylation of yeast ribosomal precursor RNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 75:311-318.[Medline]
12. Corpet, F. 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:10881-10890.
13. Daugeron, M. C., D. Kressler, and P. Linder. 2001. Dbp9p, a putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase involved in 60S-ribosomal-subunit biogenesis, functionally interacts with Dbp6p. RNA 7:1317-1334.[Abstract]
14. Daugeron, M. C., and P. Linder. 1998. Dbp7p, a putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is required for 60S ribosomal subunit assembly. RNA 4:566-581.[Abstract]
15. Decatur, W. A., and M. J. Fournier. 2002. rRNA modifications and ribosome function. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27:344-351.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Dez, C., A. Henras, B. Faucon, D. L. Lafontaine, M. Caizergues-Ferrer, and Y. Henry. 2001. Stable expression in yeast of the mature form of human telomerase RNA depends on its association with the box H/ACA small nucleolar RNP proteins Cbf5p, Nhp2p and Nop10p. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:598-603.
17. Dez, C., J. Noaillac-Depeyre, M. Caizergues-Ferrer, and Y. Henry. 2002. Naf1p, an essential nucleoplasmic factor specifically required for accumulation of box H/ACA small nucleolar RNPs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7053-7065.
18. Dragon, F., J. E. Gallagher, P. A. Compagnone-Post, B. M. Mitchell, K. A. Porwancher, K. A. Wehner, S. Wormsley, R. E. Settlage, J. Shabanowitz, Y. Osheim, A. L. Beyer, D. F. Hunt, and S. J. Baserga. 2002. A large nucleolar U3 ribonucleoprotein required for 18S ribosomal RNA biogenesis. Nature 417:967-970.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Du, Y. C., and B. Stillman. 2002. Yph1p, an ORC-interacting protein: potential links between cell proliferation control, DNA replication, and ribosome biogenesis. Cell 109:835-848.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Emery, B., J. de la Cruz, S. Rocak, O. Deloche, and P. Linder. 2004. Has1p, a member of the DEAD-box family, is required for 40S ribosomal subunit biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 52:141-158.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Fabian, G. R., and A. K. Hopper. 1987. RRP1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene affecting rRNA processing and production of mature ribosomal subunits. J. Bacteriol. 169:1571-1578.
22. Fatica, A., A. D. Cronshaw, M. Dlakic, and D. Tollervey. 2002. Ssf1p prevents premature processing of an early pre-60S ribosomal particle. Mol. Cell 9:341-351.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Fatica, A., M. Dlakic, and D. Tollervey. 2002. Naf1p is a box H/ACA snoRNP assembly factor. RNA 8:1502-1514.[Abstract]
24. Fatica, A., M. Oeffinger, M. Dlakic, and D. Tollervey. 2003. Nob1p is required for cleavage of the 3' end of 18S rRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1798-1807.
25. Fatica, A., M. Oeffinger, D. Tollervey, and I. Bozzoni. 2003. Cic1p/Nsa3p is required for synthesis and nuclear export of 60S ribosomal subunits. RNA 9:1431-1436.
26. Fatica, A., and D. Tollervey. 2003. Insights into the structure and function of a guide RNP. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10:237-239.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Fatica, A., and D. Tollervey. 2002. Making ribosomes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:313-318.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Filipowicz, W., and V. Pogacic. 2002. Biogenesis of small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:319-327.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Fouraux, M. A., M. J. M. Kolkman, A. Van der Heijden, A. S. de Jong, W. J. Van Venrooij, and G. J. M. Pruijn. 2002. The human La (SS-B) autoantigen interacts with DDX15/hPrp43, a putative DEAH-box RNA helicase. RNA 8:1428-1443.[Abstract]
30. Fromont-Racine, M., B. Senger, C. Saveanu, and F. Fasiolo. 2003. Ribosome assembly in eukaryotes. Gene 313:17-42.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Gadal, O., D. Strauss, J. Kessl, B. Trumpower, D. Tollervey, and E. Hurt. 2001. Nuclear export of 60s ribosomal subunits depends on Xpo1p and requires a nuclear export sequence-containing factor, Nmd3p, that associates with the large subunit protein Rpl10p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3405-3415.
32. Gadal, O., D. Strauss, E. Petfalski, P. E. Gleizes, N. Gas, D. Tollervey, and E. Hurt. 2002. Rlp7p is associated with 60S preribosomes, restricted to the granular component of the nucleolus, and required for pre-rRNA processing. J. Cell Biol. 157:941-951.
33. Gautier, T., T. Bergès, D. Tollervey, and E. Hurt. 1997. Nucleolar KKE/D repeat proteins Nop56p and Nop58p interact with Nop1p and are required for ribosome biogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:7088-7098.[Abstract]
34. Gavin, A. C., M. Bosche, R. Krause, P. Grandi, M. Marzioch, A. Bauer, J. Schultz, J. M. Rick, A. M. Michon, C. M. Cruciat, M. Remor, C. Hofert, M. Schelder, M. Brajenovic, H. Ruffner, A. Merino, K. Klein, M. Hudak, D. Dickson, T. Rudi, V. Gnau, A. Bauch, S. Bastuck, B. Huhse, C. Leutwein, M. A. Heurtier, R. R. Copley, A. Edelmann, E. Querfurth, V. Rybin, G. Drewes, M. Raida, T. Bouwmeester, P. Bork, B. Seraphin, B. Kuster, G. Neubauer, and G. Superti-Furga. 2002. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415:141-147.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Gleizes, P.-E., J. Noaillac-Depeyre, I. Léger-Silvestre, F. Teulieres, J.-Y. Dauxois, D. Pommet, M.-C. Azum-Gelade, and N. Gas. 2001. Ultrastructural localization of rRNA shows defective nuclear export of preribosomes in mutants of the Nup82p complex. J. Cell Biol. 155:923-936.
36. Grandi, P., V. Rybin, J. Bassler, E. Petfalski, D. Strauss, M. Marzioch, T. Schafer, B. Kuster, H. Tschochner, D. Tollervey, A. C. Gavin, and E. Hurt. 2002. 90S pre-ribosomes include the 35S pre-rRNA, the U3 snoRNP, and 40S subunit processing factors but predominantly lack 60S synthesis factors. Mol. Cell 10:105-115.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Harnpicharnchai, P., J. Jakovljevic, E. Horsey, T. Miles, J. Roman, M. Rout, D. Meagher, B. Imai, Y. Guo, C. J. Brame, J. Shabanowitz, D. F. Hunt, and J. L. Woolford, Jr. 2001. Composition and functional characterization of yeast 66S ribosome assembly intermediates. Mol. Cell 8:505-515.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Henras, A., Y. Henry, C. Bousquet-Antonelli, J. Noaillac-Depeyre, J.-P. Gélugne, and M. Caizergues-Ferrer. 1998. Nhp2p and Nop10p are essential for the function of H/ACA snoRNPs. EMBO J. 17:7078-7090.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Ho, J. H., G. Kallstrom, and A. W. Johnson. 2000. Nascent 60S ribosomal subunits enter the free pool bound by Nmd3p. RNA 6:1625-1634.[Abstract]
40. Ho, J. H., G. Kallstrom, and A. W. Johnson. 2000. Nmd3p is a Crm1p-dependent adapter protein for nuclear export of the large ribosomal subunit. J. Cell Biol. 151:1057-1066.
41. Ho, Y., A. Gruhler, A. Heilbut, G. D. Bader, L. Moore, S. L. Adams, A. Millar, P. Taylor, K. Bennett, K. Boutilier, L. Yang, C. Wolting, I. Donaldson, S. Schandorff, J. Shewnarane, M. Vo, J. Taggart, M. Goudreault, B. Muskat, C. Alfarano, D. Dewar, Z. Lin, K. Michalickova, A. R. Willems, H. Sassi, P. A. Nielsen, K. J. Rasmussen, J. R. Andersen, L. E. Johansen, L. H. Hansen, H. Jespersen, A. Podtelejnikov, E. Nielsen, J. Crawford, V. Poulsen, B. D. Sorensen, J. Matthiesen, R. C. Hendrickson, F. Gleeson, T. Pawson, M. F. Moran, D. Durocher, M. Mann, C. W. Hogue, D. Figeys, and M. Tyers. 2002. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415:180-183.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Hong, B., J. S. Brockenbrough, P. Wu, and J. P. Aris. 1997. Nop2p is required for pre-rRNA processing and 60S ribosome subunit synthesis in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:378-388.[Abstract]
43. Horsey, E. W., J. Jakovljevic, T. D. Miles, P. Harnpicharnchai, and J. L. Woolford, Jr. 2004. Role of the yeast Rrp1 protein in the dynamics of pre-ribosome maturation. RNA 10:813-827.
44. Huber, M. D., J. H. Dworet, K. Shire, L. Frappier, and M. A. McAlear. 2000. The budding yeast homolog of the human EBNA1-binding protein 2 (Ebp2p) is an essential nucleolar protein required for pre-rRNA processing. J. Biol. Chem. 275:28764-28773.
45. Huh, W. K., J. V. Falvo, L. C. Gerke, A. S. Carroll, R. W. Howson, J. S. Weissman, and E. K. O'Shea. 2003. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425:686-691.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Ito, T., T. Chiba, R. Ozawa, M. Yoshida, M. Hattori, and Y. Sakaki. 2001. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:4569-4574.
47. Kelly, T. J., and G. W. Brown. 2000. Regulation of chromosome replication. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69:829-880.[CrossRef][Medline]
48. King, T. H., B. Liu, R. R. McCully, and M. J. Fournier. 2003. Ribosome structure and activity are altered in cells lacking snoRNPs that form pseudouridines in the peptidyl transferase center. Mol. Cell 11:425-435.[CrossRef][Medline]
49. Kiss, T. 2001. Small nucleolar RNA-guided post-transcriptional modification of cellular RNAs. EMBO J. 20:3617-3622.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Kiss, T. 2002. Small nucleolar RNAs: an abundant group of noncoding RNAs with diverse cellular functions. Cell 109:145-148.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Kondo, K., and M. Inouye. 1992. Yeast NSR1 protein that has structural similarity to mammalian nucleolin is involved in pre-rRNA processing. J. Biol Chem 267:16252-16258.
52. Kressler, D., J. de la Cruz, M. Rojo, and P. Linder. 1998. Dbp6p is an essential putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase required for 60S-ribosomal-subunit assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1855-1865.
53. Kressler, D., M. Rojo, P. Linder, and J. Cruz. 1999. Spb1p is a putative methyltransferase required for 60S ribosomal subunit biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:4598-4608.
54. Lafontaine, D. L., C. Bousquet-Antonelli, Y. Henry, M. Caizergues-Ferrer, and D. Tollervey. 1998. The box H + ACA snoRNAs carry Cbf5p, the putative rRNA pseudouridine synthase. Genes Dev. 12:527-537.
55. Lafontaine, D., and D. Tollervey. 1996. One-step PCR mediated strategy for the construction of conditionally expressed and epitope tagged yeast proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:3469-3471.
56. Lafontaine, D. L., and D. Tollervey. 2001. The function and synthesis of ribosomes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2:514-520.[CrossRef][Medline]
57. Liang, W. Q., and M. J. Fournier. 1995. U14 base-pairs with 18S rRNA: a novel snoRNA interaction required for rRNA processing. Genes Dev. 9:2433-2443.
58. Longtine, M. S., A. McKenzie, D. J. Demarini, N. G. Shah, A. Wach, A. Brachat, P. Philippsen, and J. R. Pringle. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14:953-961.[CrossRef][Medline]
59. Martin, A., S. Schneider, and B. Schwer. 2002. Prp43 is an essential RNA-dependent ATPase required for release of lariat-intron from the spliceosome. J. Biol. Chem. 277:17743-17750.
60. Milkereit, P., O. Gadal, A. Podtelejnikov, S. Trumtel, N. Gas, E. Petfalski, D. Tollervey, M. Mann, E. Hurt, and H. Tschochner. 2001. Maturation and intranuclear transport of pre-ribosomes requires Noc proteins. Cell 105:499-509.[CrossRef][Medline]
61. Milkereit, P., H. Kuhn, N. Gas, and H. Tschochner. 2003. The pre-ribosomal network. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:799-804.
62. Morrissey, J. P., and D. Tollervey. 1997. U14 small nucleolar RNA makes multiple contacts with the pre-ribosomal RNA. Chromosoma 105:515-522.[CrossRef][Medline]
63. Morrissey, J. P., and D. Tollervey. 1993. Yeast snR30 is a small nucleolar RNA required for 18S rRNA synthesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:2469-2477.
64. Mougey, E. B., M. O'Reilly, Y. Osheim, O. L. Miller, Jr., A. Beyer, and B. Sollner-Webb. 1993. The terminal balls characteristic of eukaryotic rRNA transcription units in chromatin spreads are rRNA processing complexes. Genes Dev. 7:1609-1619.
65. Moy, T. I., and P. A. Silver. 1999. Nuclear export of the small ribosomal subunit requires the ran-GTPase cycle and certain nucleoporins. Genes Dev. 13:2118-2133.
66. Moy, T. I., and P. A. Silver. 2002. Requirements for the nuclear export of the small ribosomal subunit. J. Cell Sci. 115:2985-2995.
67. Nguyen, V. Q., C. Co, and J. J. Li. 2001. Cyclin-dependent kinases prevent DNA re-replication through multiple mechanisms. Nature 411:1068-1073.