Department of Developmental Biology, Wenner-Gren Institute, Arrheniuslaboratories E3, Stockholm University, Stockholm,1 UCMP, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden2
Received 12 January 2004/ Returned for modification 9 March 2004/ Accepted 27 May 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gcn5 is evolutionarily conserved and is present in several multiprotein complexes, such as the SAGA and ADA complexes in yeast and the PCAF, STAGA, and TFTC complexes in mammals (17). In yeast, Gcn5 is contained in a trimeric subcomplex with the Ada2 and Ada3 proteins within SAGA and ADA complexes (21, 24). Ada2 binds to Gcn5, and deletion of Ada2 results in a loss of Gcn5 from both SAGA and ADA complexes (21). Ada2 contains a zinc finger ZZ domain (40) and a SANT domain (1). The Ada2 SANT domain stimulates the HAT activity of Gcn5 and is involved in substrate recognition (9, 47). Transcriptional activators are believed to recruit SAGA to target genes by interacting with the Tra1 subunit (11). The SAGA complex also facilitates TATA binding protein interaction with the promoter through the Spt3 subunit (20, 29, 46).
The Drosophila melanogaster genome contains two Ada2 genes, Drosophila Ada2a (dAda2a) and dAda2b, and the corresponding proteins are present in different Gcn5-containing complexes (28, 36). A Drosophila SAGA-like complex contains dAda2b but not the dAda2a protein (28, 36). We have taken a genetic approach to analyze the function of the dAda2b protein in the development of a multicellular organism. No other SAGA-specific mutant has yet been described for Drosophila. We find that dAda2b is required for viability and normal histone H3 acetylation levels. In the absence of dAda2b, we observe increased apoptosis in response to radiation-induced DNA damage. We speculate that Ada2/Gcn5 may affect DNA damage recognition or repair, since yeast strains lacking Ada2/Gcn5 are also sensitive to a genotoxic agent.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Generation of dAda2b mutants and P-element transformation. The P element EP(3)3412 is inserted 87 bp upstream of the dAda2b gene, as determined by the Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project. We mobilized the P element by using a transposase source and scored for loss of the white marker gene. One hundred fifty independently derived white-eyed strains were tested for complementation with deficiency 3(R)dsx5, which has a deletion that includes dAda2b. Fourteen lethal lines were established, including the dAda2b1 and dAda2b2 alleles used in this study. The dAda2b alleles were balanced over TM3,Sb, and over TM3,Ubx-lacZ, TM3,Ubi-GFP, or TM6,Tb to enable selection of homozygous mutant embryos and larvae. The dAda2b alleles were also recombined onto an FRT-containing chromosome, and germ line clones were generated as previously described (18). No eggs were obtained. However, the lethality and fertility of the FRT dAda2b stock could be rescued by the genomic rescue transgene, demonstrating that dAda2b is required for oogenesis. The genomic rescue construct was injected into w1118 flies according to standard procedures (43), and an insertion on the X chromosome was used in rescue experiments.
Southern blotting and PCR. The 14 lethal strains obtained by the imprecise-excision scheme were characterized by Southern blotting and PCR. Genomic DNAs were prepared from the wild type and the 14 lethal strains; digested with either NdeI, HindIII, or BamHI; transferred to nylon filters; and probed with a 2.0-kb EcoRI-BglII fragment containing the full-length dAda2b-a cDNA by standard procedures. To identify the deletion breakpoints, PCR on genomic DNA was performed with the following primer pairs. Primer Ada2-2 (5'-AGTTTTTAATCCTGACCACCGC, bp 588 to 610 relative to the dAda2b transcription start site) was used in conjunction with primer Ada2-6 (5'-GTTCCGGTCACCTAACACCTC, bp +1938 to +1958 relative to the transcription start site) to amplify the dAda2b1 allele. The dAda2b2 allele was amplified with primers Ada2-2 and Ada2-7 (5'-ACATATCCTAGCGGCATTCAGTC, bp +3469 to + 3492 relative to + 1). The PCR products were sequenced with primer Ada2-2 to determine the deletion endpoints.
RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated from w1118 (wild type) and Ada2b1 and Ada2b2 mutant pupae by use of TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Five micrograms of total RNA was reverse transcribed with SuperScript II RNase H-free reverse transcriptase (RT) (Invitrogen). A dAda2b 3'-end-specific primer (Ada2 RT-F1, 5'-GTGCAAGGAAGAGCTTGGCG) and the ribosomal protein 49 (RP49) 3'-end-specific primer (RP49-R, 5'-TCTCGCCGCAGTAAAC) were used for first-strand synthesis. PCR was performed with Ada2b primers Ada2 RT-F1 (located in exon 3) and the forward primer Ada2 RT-R1 (5'-GAACTGCGCATTCGACAGTCAG, located at the end of exon 2) or Ada2 RT-R3 (5'-ATTCGAGTGCACTGCGCGGAG, located in exon 1) and with the RP49 primer pair RP49-R and RP49-F (5'-TGACCATCCGCCCAGCATACA) for 20 cycles at an annealing temperature of 56°C.
In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Embryos were collected from dAda2b alleles balanced over TM3,Ubx-lacZ and from Oregon R or w1118 flies (wild-type controls) on apple juice plates and aged appropriately. Ovaries (10 per probe) were dissected in Ringer's solution, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and devitellinized in methanol. RNA in situ hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes was performed as previously described (25, 48).
Immunohistochemistry was performed essentially as described previously (44). In brief, embryos were dechorionated in bleach, fixed in 4% formaldehyde, and divitellinized in methanol. Embryos were blocked in block solution (0.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]) and incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. The primary antibodies used were rat dAda2b (1:200; kindly provided by T. Kusch and J. Workman), rabbit Ac-H3 K9 (1:200, Upstate), rabbit Ac-H3 K14 (1:100, Upstate), rabbit tetra-Ac-H4 (1:200; Upstate), and rabbit Ac-H4 K8 (1:100; Upstate). To distinguish dAda2b homozygous embryos, a mouse ß-galactosidase antibody (1:2,000; Promega), recognizing LacZ expressed on the balancer chromosome, was mixed with the primary antibodies. Embryos were washed in block solution and incubated with Cy3-conjugated anti-rat (1:200) or anti-rabbit (1:500) and Cy2-conjugated anti-mouse (1:200) secondary antibodies (Jackson Laboratories) at room temperature for 2 h. After being washed in PBS-0.1% Triton X-100 solution, embryos were rinsed in PBS-50% glycerol and then mounted in 80% glycerol.
Polytene stainings. Third-instar larvae from wild-type (Oregon R) or Ada2/Ada2 homozygous larvae were dissected in PBS-0.1% Triton X-100. Polytene chromosomes were prepared and stained essentially as described previously (51). Salivary glands were fixed in 2% formaldehyde in PBS-0.1% Triton X-100-0.2% NP-40 for 30 s, followed by 2 min in 50% acetic acid-1% formaldehyde. Polytene chromosomes were chromosomes as described previously (51). The slides were washed for 30 min in PBS-0.1% Triton X-100, transferred to blocking solution (0.1 M maleic acid, 0.15 M NaCl, 1% Boehringer blocking reagent), and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The slides were then incubated overnight at 4°C with a rabbit polyclonal primary antibody (rabbit Ac-H3 K9 [1:200; Upstate], rabbit Ac-H3 K14 [1:200; Upstate], rabbit tetra-Ac-H4 [1:20; Upstate], or rabbit Ac-H4 K8 [1:75; Upstate]). The slides were washed twice for 10 min each in 0.1 M maleic acid-0.15 M NaCl-0.3% Tween 20 and blocked for 30 min. As a secondary antibody, a donkey anti-rabbit antibody conjugated with Cy3 was used (Jackson Laboratories); it was diluted 1:400 and incubated in room temperature for 2 h. The squashes were counterstained with DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (1 µg/ml) and washed twice for 10 min each before mounting with Vectashield (Vector). Several nuclei from at least three slides of each type were analyzed by using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope equipped with a KAPPA DX30C charge-coupled device camera.
GST pull-down assays. Expression of the GST-dGcn5 fusion protein in Escherichia coli BL21(pLysS) cells was induced with IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) for 3 h at 37°C, followed by purification on glutathione-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia). The dAda2b-a cDNA was in vitro translated with the TNT T7 coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega) in the presence of in vitro translation grade redivue L-[35S]methionine (Amersham Pharmacia). In vitro-translated dAda2b protein (20 µl) was mixed with equal amounts of purified GST or GST-dGcn5 protein on glutathione-Sepharose beads and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. The beads were washed three times in NTEN buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40). Proteins bound to the beads were eluted by addition of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by exposure to an FLA 3000 phosphorimager (Fuji).
Radiation-induced apoptosis assay and reaper enhancer detection. Wild-type, dAda2b, p53, or dAda2b p53 homozygous mutant third-instar larvae were mock treated or X irradiated with 800 or 4,000 rads. After a 4-h recovery at room temperature, wing imaginal disks were dissected, directly incubated in a solution of PBS and 1.6 µg of acridine orange per ml for 5 min, and then washed in PBS twice. Samples were mounted in PBS. Images were obtained on a Zeiss Axioplan 2 conventional fluorescence microscope. At the lower radiation dose, fewer cells entered apoptosis, but the difference between wild-type and mutant tissue was more readily detected. The number of apoptotic cells per disk after 800 rads of irradiation was counted in three disks of each genotype.
We generated the dAda2b p53 recombinant chromosome by crossing the dAda2b2 allele with the p53 null p535A-1-4. Progeny were crossed to dAda2b/TM6 Tb to check for the presence of dAda2b. Stocks were established, and the presence of the p53 mutation was assayed by PCR with primers p53-C1 and p53-C2, described in a personal communication to Flybase from Kent Golic (http://flybase.org/). Two dAda2b p53/TM6 Tb stocks were examined for apoptosis following irradiation.
A heatshock-reaper (hs-reaper) transgene (kindly provided by Hermann Steller) was used to induce apoptosis independently of DNA damage. An insertion on the second chromosome was crossed into dAda2b mutants. Flies of the genotype hs-reaper/+; dAda2b/TM6 Tb were used to generate dAda2b/dAda2b homozygous mutant larvae containing the hs-reaper transgene and compared with larvae from the homozygous hs-reaper stock. To induce reaper expression, wandering third-instar larvae were heat shocked at 37°C for 15 min and left to recover for 1 h at 25°C, and then the wing imaginal disks were dissected. The disks were incubated in acridine orange as described above, and the number of apoptotic cells in three disks of each genotype was counted. To ensure that transgene copy number did not influence our results, we repeated the experiment with a stock homozygous for hs-reaper (hs-reaper; dAda2b/TM6 Tb), and we found no difference from the wild-type hs-reaper stock.
The reaper enhancer transgene contains a 150-bp radiation-responsive enhancer from the reaper gene, including a p53 response element, which drives lacZ reporter gene expression (10). An insertion on the second chromosome was crossed into dAda2b mutant flies. Embryos were collected, either mock treated or X irradiated with 4,000 rads, left to recover for 3 h at room temperature, and fixed as previously described (32). The embryos were stained with a rabbit ß-galactosidase antibody (1:300; Cappel) that recognizes LacZ expressed from the reaper transgene as well as Ubx-lacZ present on the balancer chromosome, using the Vectastain ABC Elite kit.
Yeast MMS assay.
A Saccharomyces cerevisiae ada2 mutant strain (
ada2 his3
200 leu2
1 ura3-52 trp1
) and its isogenic wild-type parent were kindly provided by S. Berger. The gcn5 and ada3 mutant strains were obtained from the Research Genetics collection of deletion mutants (52) and compared to the wild-type strain BY4743 (MATa/MAT
his3
1his3
1 leu2
/leu2
ura3
/ura3
met15
/MET15 lys2
/LYS2). Tenfold serial dilutions of log-phase cultures were spotted onto yeast extract-peptone-dextrose medium lacking methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or containing 0.02% MMS. Pictures of the plates were taken after 3 days at 30°C.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Comparison of EST sequence data with the published cDNA sequence (28) indicated that two alternative splice acceptor sites might be used in the third exon. We performed RT-PCR experiments with RNAs prepared from embryos, larvae, pupae, and S2 tissue culture cells. We found that both splice sites are utilized, but we observed no difference in splice site usage during development (Fig. 1C and data not shown). The alternative splice sites result in different reading frames and generate proteins of 418 and 555 amino acids with divergent carboxy termini (Fig. 1B).
We determined the lethal phase of dAda2b mutants by use of a green fluorescent protein-expressing balancer chromosome that allowed us to select homozygous mutant animals. dAda2b1 and dAda2b2 homozygotes die during early pupal stages, most often before head eversion occurs, without any other gross morphological abnormalities (data not shown). Ada2b mRNA was undetectable in homozygous mutant pupae (Fig. 1C), suggesting that dAda2b1 and dAda2b2 are null alleles.
A transgenic line containing a genomic piece of DNA encompassing the dAda2b locus fully rescues the lethality of the dAda2b alleles, demonstrating that the lethality is caused by loss of dAda2b gene product (Fig. 1A).
Embryonic expression of dAda2b and dGcn5. Ada2 proteins are present in many Gcn5-containing complexes. To confirm that Drosophila Ada2b and Gcn5 are able to interact, a GST pull-down assay was performed. As shown in Fig. 2J, bacterially expressed GST-dGcn5 efficiently binds to in vitro-translated dAda2b protein. We next compared the embryonic expression pattern of dAda2b to that of dGcn5 by in situ hybridization. Both dAda2b and dGcn5 are maternally contributed, as their transcripts can be detected at the precellular stage (Fig. 2A and D). We confirmed this finding by staining ovaries with the dAda2b and dGcn5 probes. Both transcripts are present in nurse cells of stage 10 egg chambers and are dumped in the oocyte when the nurse cells degenerate at late oogenesis (data not shown).
|
Reduced histone H3 acetylation levels in dAda2b mutant animals. Since yeast Ada2 is required for maintaining Gcn5 in the SAGA complex and stimulates the catalytic activity of Gcn5, we investigated histone acetylation levels in dAda2b mutants. We performed whole-mount immunostainings of Drosophila embryos by using antibodies directed against different acetylated forms of histone H3 and histone H4. No difference between wild-type and dAda2b mutant embryos was observed until late stage 15, when dAda2b protein levels become reduced (Fig. 2). At this stage, anti-acetylated H3 and H4 antibodies labeled mainly the CNS and epidermis (Fig. 3). We found a dramatic decrease in staining intensity in dAda2b mutant embryos compared to the wild type when using antibodies directed against acetylated lysine 14 or lysine 9 in histone H3 (Fig. 3A to D). By contrast, anti-acetylated H4 lysine 8 and a tetra-acetylated histone H4 antibody gave comparable signals in wild-type and dAda2b mutant embryos (Fig. 3E to H).
|
|
|
|
|
Taken together, our results show that Ada2 and its associated proteins are sensitive to genotoxic agents in both yeast and flies, indicating that an Ada2-Gcn5 complex may facilitate efficient DNA repair or the generation of a DNA damage signal.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The reduced histone H3 acetylation levels appear to persist during development, as third-instar larval salivary gland chromosomes retained a similar reduction in H3 acetylation (Fig. 4). Interestingly, chromatin acetylation is globally affected in dAda2b mutants, rather than affecting a subset of genes. Therefore, dAda2b is not likely to function solely as an adaptor that brings dGcn5 to only some promoter regions through associations with transcriptional activators. Instead, it is probable that dAda2b has a function similar to that of yeast Ada2, which is to retain Gcn5 within the SAGA complex and to stimulate its catalytic activity. This result also suggests that the SAGA complex, or at least a dAda2b-dGcn5 complex, has functions in addition to transcription-coupled gene-specific acetylation. Some heterochromatic regions with low gene density that stain with DAPI contain acetylated histone H3. These regions exhibit a decrease in H3 acetylation similar to that of other parts of the chromosomes (Fig. 4).
Drosophila Gcn5 is present in complexes in addition to the dAda2b-containing SAGA-like complex (28, 36). Our results indicate that the fraction of dGcn5 that associates with dAda2b makes a significant contribution to the overall levels of histone H3 acetylation and that association with dAda2a cannot substitute for dGcn5's function within the SAGA complex. Interestingly, normal histone H3 acetylation appears to be dispensable for development from at least mid-embryogenesis until pupation. Furthermore, we do not know if the lethality observed at pupation is caused by reduced histone acetylation or by another function of dAda2b. In addition to its role in pupal development, dAda2b is also required for oogenesis. Females with dAda2b homozygous germ cells lack developed ovaries.
All Ada2 proteins share a ZZ zinc finger and a SANT domain in their N termini (28, 36). The minimal Gcn5 interaction domain includes both the ZZ domain and the SANT domain (5, 14, 15), and the SANT domain additionally stimulates Gcn5's catalytic activity (9, 47). We observed that the dAda2b gene is alternatively spliced, generating proteins with different C termini. Both protein isoforms contain the ZZ and SANT domains, but the longer isoform lacks another conserved element, Ada box 3 (36). However, we found no evidence for differential usage of the two proteins during development (Fig. 1). The Ada2-Gcn5 interaction, although conserved in evolution, is species specific. For example, human Ada2a cannot interact with yeast Gcn5 (15), and both Drosophila Ada2a and Ada2b fail to interact with yeast Gcn5 (36). As might be expected from these results, we found that dAda2b fails to complement a yeast Ada2 mutant (not shown).
It is believed that the SAGA complex is recruited to target genes through interactions with sequence-specific transcription factors (12). At the promoter, the Gcn5 subunit acetylates histone H3 and perhaps other proteins, whereas the Spt 3 subunit facilitates preinitiation complex assembly by interacting with TATA binding protein (4, 7, 8, 20, 29, 46). Several yeast activator proteins, including Gcn4, Pho4, and Gal4, require the SAGA complex for activity and recruit it to target genes in vivo (4, 6, 8, 19, 26, 29). The activator proteins VP16 and Drosophila p53 can precipitate the SAGA-like complex from a Drosophila S2 cell nuclear extract (28). We tested whether this interaction is of significance for the in vivo function of the Drosophila p53 protein. We found that p53-induced apoptosis and reaper gene expression in response to DNA damage are not impaired in dAda2b mutants (Fig. 5). This result indicates that the Ada2/Gcn5 subcomplex of SAGA is not necessary for p53 function, but it does not exclude the possibility that p53 activity requires other SAGA components. In fact, many yeast genes show a differential requirement for the Ada2/Gcn5 and Spt3 subcomplexes of SAGA (19, 31).
Unexpectedly, we found increased apoptosis in response to gamma radiation in dAda2b mutants. Irradiation causes DNA damage, which leads to activation of ATM/ATR kinases that phosphorylate a variety of substrates, including the Chk2 kinase, ultimately resulting in p53 activation (2, 35, 42). In Drosophila, p53 activation brings about apoptosis but does not lead to a G1 cell cycle arrest, which is another possible outcome in mammalian cells (30, 45). It is possible that the reason for increased apoptosis in dAda2b mutants is that dAda2b normally has an inhibitory role in the generation of a DNA damage signal or in controlling p53 function. Another possibility is that DNA repair is not as efficient in dAda2b mutants as in the wild type, leading more cells to enter the apoptosis program. The role of dAda2b in DNA repair could be indirect. For example, dAda2b could be necessary for proper expression of a DNA repair factor. Alternatively, dAda2b might have a more direct function in DNA repair, presumably through chromatin modification. We found that in dAda2b mutants, excessive apoptosis occurs after irradiation but not before irradiation or when apoptosis is induced by an alternative means (Fig. 5 and 6). Furthermore, the extra apoptosis is p53 dependent (Fig. 6). For this reason, we find it unlikely that increased apoptosis in dAda2b mutants is the consequence of a higher sensitivity to stress in general. Instead, we believe that dAda2b has a role in the p53-dependent pathway that is activated by DNA damage.
All eukaryotes respond to DNA lesions with activation of ATM/ATR kinases, although the downstream component p53 is absent from unicellular organisms such as the yeast S. cerevisiae (33). If the involvement of dAda2b in the DNA damage response is upstream of p53 activation, one would predict this function to be conserved in evolution. In fact, we demonstrate that yeast strains lacking Ada2p, or Gcn5p or Ada3p, are sensitive to the genotoxic agent MMS (Fig. 7). It is possible, therefore, that histone acetylation facilitates DNA repair or generates a DNA damage signal. Intriguingly, an increase in radiation-induced apoptosis of a magnitude similar to what we observe in dAda2b mutants was observed in larvae in which the C terminus of a histone variant, H2Av, is missing (34). The H2Av C terminus contains a conserved serine that is phosphorylated in response to DNA double-strand breaks (41). Apparently, the absence of this phosphorylation event reduces DNA repair efficiency, which increases the amount of apoptosis twofold (34). Perhaps histone acetylation likewise contributes to the generation of a DNA damage signal, and maybe this is why chromatin is globally acetylated by Ada2/Gcn5. Future studies will be aimed at investigating this possibility.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (to M.M. and J.L.) and the Swedish Cancer Society (to M.M.).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Abraham, R. T. 2001. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15:2177-2196.
3. Allfrey, V. G., R. Faulkner, and A. E. Mirsky. 1964. Acetylation and methylation of histones and their possible role in the regulation of RNA synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 51:786-794.
4. Barbaric, S., H. Reinke, and W. Horz. 2003. Multiple mechanistically distinct functions of SAGA at the PHO5 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:3468-3476.
5. Barlev, N. A., R. Candau, L. Wang, P. Darpino, N. Silverman, and S. L. Berger. 1995. Characterization of physical interactions of the putative transcriptional adaptor, ADA2, with acidic activation domains and TATA-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 270:19337-19344.
6. Berger, S. L., B. Pina, N. Silverman, G. A. Marcus, J. Agapite, J. L. Regier, S. J. Triezenberg, and L. Guarente. 1992. Genetic isolation of ADA2: a potential transcriptional adaptor required for function of certain acidic activation domains. Cell 70:251-265.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Bhaumik, S. R., and M. R. Green. 2002. Differential requirement of SAGA components for recruitment of TATA-box-binding protein to promoters in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7365-7371.
8. Bhaumik, S. R., and M. R. Green. 2001. SAGA is an essential in vivo target of the yeast acidic activator Gal4p. Genes Dev. 15:1935-1945.
9. Boyer, L. A., M. R. Langer, K. A. Crowley, S. Tan, J. M. Denu, and C. L. Peterson. 2002. Essential role for the SANT domain in the functioning of multiple chromatin remodeling enzymes. Mol. Cell 10:935-942.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Brodsky, M. H., W. Nordstrom, G. Tsang, E. Kwan, G. M. Rubin, and J. M. Abrams. 2000. Drosophila p53 binds a damage response element at the reaper locus. Cell 101:103-113.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Brown, C. E., L. Howe, K. Sousa, S. C. Alley, M. J. Carrozza, S. Tan, and J. L. Workman. 2001. Recruitment of HAT complexes by direct activator interactions with the ATM-related Tra1 subunit. Science 292:2333-2337.
12. Brown, C. E., T. Lechner, L. Howe, and J. L. Workman. 2000. The many HATs of transcription coactivators. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:15-19.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Brownell, J. E., J. Zhou, T. Ranalli, R. Kobayashi, D. G. Edmondson, S. Y. Roth, and C. D. Allis. 1996. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 84:843-851.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Candau, R., and S. L. Berger. 1996. Structural and functional analysis of yeast putative adaptors. Evidence for an adaptor complex in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 271:5237-5245.
15. Candau, R., P. A. Moore, L. Wang, N. Barlev, C. Y. Ying, C. A. Rosen, and S. L. Berger. 1996. Identification of human proteins functionally conserved with the yeast putative adaptors ADA2 and GCN5. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:593-602.[Abstract]
16. Candau, R., D. M. Scolnick, P. Darpino, C. Y. Ying, T. D. Halazonetis, and S. L. Berger. 1997. Two tandem and independent sub-activation domains in the amino terminus of p53 require the adaptor complex for activity. Oncogene 15:807-816.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Carrozza, M. J., R. T. Utley, J. L. Workman, and J. Cote. 2003. The diverse functions of histone acetyltransferase complexes. Trends Genet. 19:321-329.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Chou, T. B., and N. Perrimon. 1996. The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144:1673-1679.[Abstract]
19. Dudley, A. M., C. Rougeulle, and F. Winston. 1999. The Spt components of SAGA facilitate TBP binding to a promoter at a post-activator-binding step in vivo. Genes Dev. 13:2940-2945.
20. Eisenmann, D. M., K. M. Arndt, S. L. Ricupero, J. W. Rooney, and F. Winston. 1992. SPT3 interacts with TFIID to allow normal transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 6:1319-1331.
21. Grant, P. A., L. Duggan, J. Cote, S. M. Roberts, J. E. Brownell, R. Candau, R. Ohba, T. Owen-Hughes, C. D. Allis, F. Winston, S. L. Berger, and J. L. Workman. 1997. Yeast Gcn5 functions in two multisubunit complexes to acetylate nucleosomal histones: characterization of an Ada complex and the SAGA (Spt/Ada) complex. Genes Dev. 11:1640-1650.
22. Grant, P. A., A. Eberharter, S. John, R. G. Cook, B. M. Turner, and J. L. Workman. 1999. Expanded lysine acetylation specificity of Gcn5 in native complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 274:5895-5900.
23. Hampsey, M. 1997. A SAGA of histone acetylation and gene expression. Trends Genet. 13:427-429.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Horiuchi, J., N. Silverman, G. A. Marcus, and L. Guarente. 1995. ADA3, a putative transcriptional adaptor, consists of two separable domains and interacts with ADA2 and GCN5 in a trimeric complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:1203-1209.[Abstract]
25. Jiang, J., T. Hoey, and M. Levine. 1991. Autoregulation of a segmentation gene in Drosophila: combinatorial interaction of the even-skipped homeo box protein with a distal enhancer element. Genes Dev. 5:265-277.
26. Kuo, M. H., E. von Baur, K. Struhl, and C. D. Allis. 2000. Gcn4 activator targets Gcn5 histone acetyltransferase to specific promoters independently of transcription. Mol. Cell 6:1309-1320.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Kurdistani, S. K., and M. Grunstein. 2003. Histone acetylation and deacetylation in yeast. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:276-284.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Kusch, T., S. Guelman, S. M. Abmayr, and J. L. Workman. 2003. Two Drosophila Ada2 homologues function in different multiprotein complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:3305-3319.
29. Larschan, E., and F. Winston. 2001. The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. Genes Dev. 15:1946-1956.
30. Lee, J. H., E. Lee, J. Park, E. Kim, J. Kim, and J. Chung. 2003. In vivo p53 function is indispensable for DNA damage-induced apoptotic signaling in Drosophila. FEBS Lett. 550:5-10.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Lee, T. I., H. C. Causton, F. C. Holstege, W. C. Shen, N. Hannett, E. G. Jennings, F. Winston, M. R. Green, and R. A. Young. 2000. Redundant roles for the TFIID and SAGA complexes in global transcription. Nature 405:701-704.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Lilja, T., D. Qi, M. Stabell, and M. Mannervik. 2003. The CBP coactivator functions both upstream and downstream of Dpp/Screw signaling in the early Drosophila embryo. Dev. Biol. 262:294-302.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Lowndes, N. F., and J. R. Murguia. 2000. Sensing and responding to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10:17-25.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Madigan, J. P., H. L. Chotkowski, and R. L. Glaser. 2002. DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3698-3705.
35. Motoyama, N., and K. Naka. 2004. DNA damage tumor suppressor genes and genomic instability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14:11-16.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Muratoglu, S., S. Georgieva, G. Papai, E. Scheer, I. Enunlu, O. Komonyi, I. Cserpan, L. Lebedeva, E. Nabirochkina, A. Udvardy, L. Tora, and I. Boros. 2003. Two different Drosophila ADA2 homologues are present in distinct GCN5 histone acetyltransferase-containing complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:306-321.
37. Ollmann, M., L. M. Young, C. J. Di Como, F. Karim, M. Belvin, S. Robertson, K. Whittaker, M. Demsky, W. W. Fisher, A. Buchman, G. Duyk, L. Friedman, C. Prives, and C. Kopczynski. 2000. Drosophila p53 is a structural and functional homolog of the tumor suppressor p53. Cell 101:91-101.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Peterson, C. L., and J. Cote. 2004. Cellular machineries for chromosomal DNA repair. Genes Dev. 18:602-616.
39. Pile, L. A., and D. A. Wassarman. 2000. Chromosomal localization links the SIN3-RPD3 complex to the regulation of chromatin condensation, histone acetylation and gene expression. EMBO J. 19:6131-6140.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Ponting, C. P., D. J. Blake, K. E. Davies, J. Kendrick-Jones, and S. J. Winder. 1996. ZZ and TAZ: new putative zinc fingers in dystrophin and other proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21:11-13.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Redon, C., D. Pilch, E. Rogakou, O. Sedelnikova, K. Newrock, and W. Bonner. 2002. Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12:162-169.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Rouse, J., and S. P. Jackson. 2002. Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 297:547-551.
43. Rubin, G. M., and A. C. Spradling. 1982. Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. Science 218:348-353.
44. Samakovlis, C., G. Manning, P. Steneberg, N. Hacohen, R. Cantera, and M. A. Krasnow. 1996. Genetic control of epithelial tube fusion during Drosophila tracheal development. Development 122:3531-3536.[Abstract]
45. Sogame, N., M. Kim, and J. M. Abrams. 2003. Drosophila p53 preserves genomic stability by regulating cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:4696-4701.
46. Sterner, D. E., P. A. Grant, S. M. Roberts, L. J. Duggan, R. Belotserkovskaya, L. A. Pacella, F. Winston, J. L. Workman, and S. L. Berger. 1999. Functional organization of the yeast SAGA complex: distinct components involved in structural integrity, nucleosome acetylation, and TATA-binding protein interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:86-98.
47. Sterner, D. E., X. Wang, M. H. Bloom, G. M. Simon, and S. L. Berger. 2002. The SANT domain of Ada2 is required for normal acetylation of histones by the yeast SAGA complex. J. Biol. Chem. 277:8178-8186.
48. Tautz, D., and C. Pfeifle. 1989. A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma 98:81-85.[CrossRef][Medline]
49. Turner, B. M., A. J. Birley, and J. Lavender. 1992. Histone H4 isoforms acetylated at specific lysine residues define individual chromosomes and chromatin domains in Drosophila polytene nuclei. Cell 69:375-384.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Utley, R. T., K. Ikeda, P. A. Grant, J. Cote, D. J. Steger, A. Eberharter, S. John, and J. L. Workman. 1998. Transcriptional activators direct histone acetyltransferase complexes to nucleosomes. Nature 394:498-502.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. White, R. A. H. 1998. Immunolabelling of Drosophila, p. 215-240. In D. B. Roberts (ed.), Drosophila, a practical approach, 2nd ed. IRL Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
52. Winzeler, E. A., D. D. Shoemaker, A. Astromoff, H. Liang, K. Anderson, B. Andre, R. Bangham, R. Benito, J. D. Boeke, H. Bussey, A. M. Chu, C. Connelly, K. Davis, F. Dietrich, S. W. Dow, M. El Bakkoury, F. Foury, S. H. Friend, E. Gentalen, G. Giaever, J. H. Hegemann, T. Jones, M. Laub, H. Liao, R. W. Davis, et al. 1999. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Science 285:901-906.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|