RI Are Mediated by Its Interaction with Lyn Kinase
Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research Vienna, Vienna, Austria,1 Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland2
Received 28 January 2004/ Returned for modification 1 April 2004/ Accepted 6 July 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and the generation of inositol trisphosphate. Here we show that sphingosine kinase type 1 (SPHK1) interacts directly with the tyrosine kinase Lyn and that this interaction leads to the recruitment of this lipid kinase to the high-affinity receptor for immunoglobulin E (Fc
RI). The interaction of SPHK1 with Lyn caused enhanced lipid and tyrosine kinase activity. After Fc
RI triggering, enhanced sphingosine kinase activity was associated with Fc
RI in sphingolipid-enriched rafts of mast cells. Bone marrow-derived mast cells from Lyn/ mice, compared to syngeneic wild-type cells, were defective in the initial induction of SPHK1 activity, and the defect was overcome by retroviral Lyn expression. These findings position the activation of SPHK1 as an Fc
RI proximal event. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RI and Fc
RI signaling), its relationship to other known mast cell signaling molecules is still unexplored (24, 37). Recent data on Fc
RI positioned SPHK downstream of phospholipase D, with a dependence on phosphatidic acid, similar to the demonstrated requirements for activation by Fc
RI (24, 25). However, SPHK activity is stimulated by many other triggers, including platelet-derived growth factor, tumor necrosis factor alpha, nerve growth factor, muscarinic acetylcholine agonists, and serum and phorbol esters, though the mechanisms leading to cell type-specific SPHK activation are not fully understood (9, 21, 26, 31, 47, 48). Recently, protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent membrane translocation of SPHK by phorbol ester stimulation of HEK293 cells was described, providing another possible clue in SPHK activation (46). In addition, by using the yeast two-hybrid system, several interacting proteins have been isolated. These include tumor necrosis factor alpha receptor-associated factor 2, protein kinase A anchoring protein-related protein, and RPK118, but the function of these molecules (as adaptors) and their effects on SPHK activity still remains unclear (13, 19, 49).
Herein we demonstrate that, in mast cells, SPHK directly interacts with the src family tyrosine kinase Lyn, providing a possible mechanistic explanation of the previous finding that the activity of this lipid kinase is increased after Fc
RI triggering (37). We now provide evidence that Lyn recruits SPHK to Fc
RI during IgE-dependent mast cell activation and that a complex of SPHK and Lyn features enhanced lipid and tyrosine kinase activity. The importance of Lyn for SPHK activation is further demonstrated by the loss of the initial rise of SPHK activity in Fc
RI-triggered mast cells generated from Lyn/ mice and by the restoration of this defect when Lyn is reintroduced in these cells.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reagents, antibodies, and kits.
A TNT T7 Quick coupled transcription and translation system was obtained from Promega. A signal transduction antibody (Ab) array was purchased from Hypromatrix. Rabbit antibodies or antisera for immunoprecipitation (IP) of linker of activated T cells (LAT), Lyn, Syk, and p53 were from Santa Cruz, the monoclonal Ab to myc was from Clontech (isotype IgG1), the antiserum to Fc
RI
was from Upstate, and the monoclonal Ab to Flag M2 was from Sigma-Aldrich (isotype IgG1). Rabbit antibodies or antisera for Western blot detection of LAT, PI3K (directed against p85 subunit), myc, and Fc
RI
were from Upstate, Ab to p42/44 Erk was from Cell Signaling, while the monoclonal Ab to Lyn (isotype IgG2
) and the rabbit polyclonal antiserum to Syk and to p53 were from Santa Cruz. Protein G Sepharose 4 Fast Flow was obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. [35S]methionine and [
-32P]ATP were also purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, and D-erythro [3-3H]S was from ARC. S, 1-ß-D-galactosylsphingosine, 1-ß-D-glucosylsphingosine, and doxycycline were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The tyrosine kinase (Src family) substrate peptide pack, including [Lys19] cdc2 peptide and human recombinant c-Jun protein, was from Upstate. Human recombinant Lyn protein (hLyn) was from Calbiochem, and human recombinant and highly enriched Syk preparations were from Novartis.
Cell culture and stimulation.
HeLa clone 12 cells, harboring the human Fc
RI (1; M. Woisetschläger, unpublished data), were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (Gibco, Invitrogen) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Tet system approved; Clontech), 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.3), penicillin (100 IU/ml)-streptomycin (100 µg/ml), 2 mM L-glutamine, geneticin (500 µg/ml), and hygromycin (600 µg/ml; Gibco, Invitrogen). BMMC from wild-type and Lyn/ mice [strain C57BL6J-Lyn(N6); Jackson Laboratory] were cultured as described previously (40) in media supplemented with 20 ng of interleukin-3 (IL-3)/ml and 20 ng of stem cell factor (SCF)/ml. Differentiation of mast cells was monitored as previously described (40). Cells were used when greater than 95% of the population expressed Fc
RI. Cells were sensitized with 2 µg of murine IgE/ml and stimulated with 100 ng of 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP)-bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Calbiochem)/ml.
Cloning. The murine Lyn (mLyn) coding region was cloned into the pDual GC expression vector (Stratagene) using PCR amplification. The primers 5' cgctcttcgATGGGATGTATTAAATCAAAAAGGAA 3' and 5' cgctcttcgaagCTACGGTTGCTGCTGATACTG 3', containing Eam1104I restriction enzyme sites (given in lowercase letters), were used for amplification. The conditions for PCR amplification were as follows: 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 45 s, followed by 68°C for 2.5 min. mSPHK1 and mp53 were cloned analogously by using the primers 5' ggctcttCTATGGAACCAGAATGCCCTCG 3' and 5' ggctcttcgaagTGGTTCTTCTGGAGGTGGCC 3' for SPHK1 and 5' cgctcttcgATGACTGCCATGGAGGAGT 3' and 5' cgctcttcgaagCTATCAGTCTGAGTCAGGCCC 3' for mp53, each containing Eam1104I restriction enzyme sites for cloning (given in lowercase letters).
Ab array and hybridization. The mSPHK1 was expressed in a coupled in vitro transcription and translation system from a pDual GC vector background (as a myc tag version) using the TNT T7 reticulocyte lysate system in the presence of [35S]methionine, as described by the supplier. Mast cell lysates were generated from a total of 107 BMMC, stimulated for 5 or 10 min by IgE-Ag before lysing them in a buffer (lysis buffer: 15 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 120 mM NaCl, 25 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 0.5% Triton X-100, 10 µg of leupeptin/ml, and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF]) at 4°C for 20 min. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation for 15 min at 4°C and 13,000 rpm in a Heraeus Biofuge microcentrifuge. The protein concentration was measured using the bicinchoninic assay kit (Pierce) and adjusted to 5 mg/ml. Two milliliters of lysates (1 ml of 5- and 10-min-stimulated BMMC each) was incubated with 250 µl of [35S]methionine-labeled mSPHK1 from the transcription and translation reaction and brought to a 5-ml volume with lysis buffer (containing 1% dry milk), and the formation of protein complexes was for 1 h at room temperature under gentle shaking. This mixture was then further incubated with the Ab array membrane for 90 min to allow binding of protein/SPHK complexes by the corresponding Ab. The membrane was then washed three times for 15 min each with TBST buffer (150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 0.05% Tween 20) and subjected to autoradiography using an intensifier screen.
IPs in vitro. Proteins generated by in vitro transcription and translation were allowed to form complexes in lysis buffer-low Triton (15 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 120 mM NaCl, 25 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM DTT, 0.1% Triton X-100, 10 µg of leupeptin/ml, 0.5 mM PMSF) for 1 h at room temperature. Samples were added to tubes containing Ab or antisera to myc, Lyn, and p53, prebound to protein G Sepharose, and further incubated for 2 h at 4°C. Immunoprecipitates were collected by centrifugation, washed three times with Tris-buffered saline (150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris [pH 7.5]), resuspended in SDS loading buffer, and separated by SDS-PAGE (4 to 20% Tris-glycine gels; Invitrogen). Gels were subsequently fixed in 40% methanol-10% acetic acid, dried, and subjected to autoradiography.
IPs from cells.
Twenty-four hours prior to transfection, HeLa cells (4 x 105 each) were seeded in 60-mm culture dishes in full growth medium; 12 h prior to transfection doxycycline (2 µg/ml) was added to induce Fc
RI expression. Effectene transfection reagent (QIAGEN) was used for transient transfection according to the manufacturer's protocol in the presence of full growth medium and doxycycline. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were harvested and washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed as described above under conditions that maintain the integrity of Fc
RI. For co-IP of SPHK from the extracts of HeLa cells, antibodies to Fc
RI
, Flag epitope, Lyn, myc, and p53 were prebound to protein G Sepharose and incubated with the cell lysates for 2 h at 4°C. After precipitation by centrifugation and three washing steps, half of the beads were resuspended in 70 µl of SPHK buffer (50 mM HEPES, 50 mM LiCl, 15 mM MgCl2, 15 mM CaCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA). Subsequently ATP (final concentration, 10 µM), S (final concentration, 10 µM), and [
-32P]ATP (5 µCi) were added and incubated for 45 min at 30°C. Lipids were extracted and analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) (n-butanol-acetic acid-H2O, 6:2:2). After drying, the plate was subjected to autoradiography. The detected S1P levels were normalized to total extracted S, which was determined by Fluram staining (detects the primary amine of S) (5). Additionally, where possible, the remaining half of the beads were used in Western blot analysis to calibrate for the amount of recovered protein G Sepharose beads and/or the specific protein precipitated. All IPs were performed identically.
Lyn kinase assays.
Recombinant hLyn at various concentrations and recombinant hSPHK1 were diluted in lysis buffer-low Triton and incubated for 1 h at room temperature, allowing complex formation. Afterwards, 10 µl of the peptide substrate {[Lys19] cdc2 (6-20)-NH2}, 10 µl of Src reaction buffer (100 mM Tris [pH 7.2], 125 mM MgCl2, 25 mM MnCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 0.25 mM sodium orthovanadate, 2 mM DTT), and 10 µl of ATP cocktail (75 mM MnCl2, 5 µM rATP in 20 mM morpholinepropanesulfonic acid [pH 7.2], 25 mM ß-glycerol phosphate, 5 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM DTT) including 5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP were added to hLyn or hLyn/hSPHK1 complexes, and the reaction was incubated at 30°C for 10 min with subsequent SDS-PAGE separation (16% Tricine gel; Invitrogen). Lyn autophosphorylation and the possible phosphorylation of hSPHK by Lyn kinase were measured (in the absence of peptide substrate) and analyzed on 4 to 20% Tris-glycine gels (Invitrogen). After electrophoresis, the gels were fixed in 40% methanol-10% acetic acid overnight, dried, and subjected to autoradiography. For assays in which Fc
RI
was used as a substrate, lysates of 4 x 107 mast cells were incubated with Ab to Fc
RI
prebound to protein G Sepharose. After precipitation and washing, 30 µl of the beads was added either to hLyn alone or to hLyn/hSPHK1 complexes. The same Src reaction buffer, ATP cocktail, and assay conditions as described above were used. Proteins were resolved by 4 to 20% Tris-glycine gels (Invitrogen).
S-binding dot blots.
hLyn, hFyn (Upstate), hSPHK1 (see below), hc-Jun (Gst fusion protein; amino acids 1 to 169) (Upstate), hPKC
(Calbiochem), hErk1 (Upstate), and Flag protein (Novartis) were dotted on a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (0.2-µm pore size; Invitrogen). The membrane was blocked with TBST plus 5% dry milk (150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 0.05% Tween 20) for 1 h at room temperature. [3H]S (15 µCi) was diluted in TBST plus 0.5% dry milk and incubated with the membrane for 1 h. After washing (three times in TBST plus 0.1% milk), the membrane was dried and subjected to autoradiography.
Cloning and expression of hSPHK1. The 1,155-bp coding sequence for hSPHK1 was amplified by PCR from a human fetal cDNA library (Clontech) using primers GCCACCATGGATCCAGCGGGCGGCCCC and TCATAAGGGCTCTTCTGGCGGTGGCATCTG and cloned into the vector pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen). For recombinant protein expression, hSPHK1 was amplified using primers GCATTAGAATTCATGGATCCAGCGGGCGGCCCC and TAACGCGTCGACTCATAAGGGCTCTTCTGGCGGTGGCATCTG; the product was digested with EcoRI and SalI and ligated with EcoRI/SalI-digested pET32a(+) vector (Novagen); thus, the hSPHK1 coding sequence was fused in frame with N-terminal Escherichia coli thioredoxin (Trx). The E. coli strain BL21(DE3) (Novagen) was transfected with the expression plasmid. Bacteria were cultured in Luria-Bertani medium with 100 µg of ampicillin/ml. For protein production, 5 liters of medium was inoculated with 50 ml of an overnight culture, and bacteria were grown at 37°C to optical density at 600 nm of 0.6 to 0.7. The temperature was then shifted to 28°C and isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a final concentration of 1 mM. Three hours after induction, cells were harvested, washed once with PBS, and frozen at 80°C. For protein purification, the cell pellet from a 5-liter culture was thawed and suspended in 250 ml of ice-cold PBS containing 2.5% Trasylol (Bayer). Cells were lysed using a French press (two passages, 100 lb/in2; Aminco). Triton X-100 was added to a final concentration of 2%, followed by sonication (two times for 1 min, 50 W). The lysate was centrifuged (30 min, 16,000 x g). The pellet was discarded, and the supernatant was applied onto a Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid column (1 by 8 cm; QIAGEN), equilibrated with buffer 1 (PBS, 2.5% Trasylol, 2% Triton X-100), and operated at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. The column was first washed with buffer 1 and then with buffer 2 (10 mM imidazole-HCl [pH 7.5], 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2.5% Trasylol). The fusion protein was eluted with buffer 3 (200 mM imidazole-HCl [pH 7.5], 250 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2.5% Trasylol). Fractions were tested for enzymatic activity. Active fractions were pooled and dialyzed against buffer 4 (25 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 1 mM 1,4-dithioerythritol, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1 M NaCl, 4 mM CaCl2). The material was applied to a calmodulin Sepharose column (1 by 6 cm; Pharmacia), equilibrated with buffer 4, and operated at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The column was washed with 5 volumes of buffer 4 and then eluted with buffer 5 (25 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 1 mM 1,4-dithioerythritol, 10% glycerol, 0.05% Triton X-100, 1 M NaCl, 2 mM EGTA). Active fractions were pooled and stored in aliquots at 80°C. Resolution of proteins by SDS-PAGE showed the final preparation to contain a single band at approximately 60 kDa (theoretical Mr, 60,490). From a 5-liter culture of the recombinant bacteria, 226 µg of Trx-SPHK fusion protein was obtained.
SPHK activity measurement and retroviral transduction of Lyn-deficient BMMC.
BMMC were washed and incubated in SCF-free media for 20 to 24 h and then sensitized with 1-µg/ml anti-DNP mouse IgE in IL-3-free media containing 2% fetal bovine serum for three additional hours. Cells were washed twice and resuspended in Tyrode-BSA buffer (37°C; 20 mM HEPES buffer [pH 7.4], 135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5.6 mM glucose, 0.05% BSA) at a density of 3 x 107 cells/ml, aliquoted, and activated with equal volumes of 200-ng/ml DNP for the indicated time. The reaction was stopped by addition of 3 ml of cold PBS containing 100 µM sodium orthovanadate. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in buffer A (50 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 100 mM KCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 40 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 15 mM NaF, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 µg [each] of leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin/ml, 1 mM PMSF, 0.5 mM 4-deoxypyridoxine) and lysed by freeze-thawing. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 21,000 x g for 30 min. Thus, the lysates likely contained some small membrane fragments. Twenty micrograms of the lysate was used to measure SPHK activity. SPHK activity was measured essentially as described previously (30) by incubating cell samples with 50 µM S and [
-32P]ATP (0.5 µCi, 1 mM) containing MgCl2 (10 mM) in a final volume of 200 µl of buffer for 20 min at 37°C. Labeled lipids were extracted and resolved by TLC as described previously (30), and [32P]S1P was quantified with a Molecular Dynamics Storm phosphorimager. SPHK specific activity was expressed as picomoles of S1P formed per min per mg of protein. To preferentially measure SPHK1 activity, cell extracts were assayed in duplicate samples, taking advantage of the differential biochemical properties of the two isoforms of SPHKs (20). Detailed measurements in either SPHK1 or SPHK2 highly overexpressing HEK cells confirmed that under these specific conditions the activity of each SPHK can be measured separately with no more than 20% cross-contamination (data not shown). S for the SPHK1 assay was prepared in mixed micelles with Triton X-100 (final concentration, 0.25%) (20).
Retroviral transduction of BMMC to reconstitute the expression of Lyn in gene-deleted mice was as previously described (41). The retroviral wild-type Lyn construct used in these studies was kindly provided by Kenneth W. Harder and Margaret L. Hibbs (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne, Australia). Briefly, 10-day-old bone marrow cultures were infected with retrovirus carrying the gene for wild-type Lyn, internal ribosomal entry site-green fluorescent protein, and antibiotic resistance to puromycin as a selection marker. After transduction, cells were rested for 48 h and then selected in IL-3- and SCF-supplemented media containing 0.8 mg of puromycin/ml. After 2 weeks of selection, cells were assayed for green fluorescent protein expression and for expression of Lyn kinase. Expression of Lyn remained stable for up to 8 weeks, and cultures were >98% Fc
RI positive by 28 days. Lyn expression was verified by Western blot analysis.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RI on mast cells (37). To position SPHK hierarchically in the initial signaling events, we focused on identifying mast cell proteins that interact directly or indirectly with this kinase. Experimentally, an Ab array approach was used to search for associated proteins. In vitro transcribed and translated, radiolabeled murine SPHK (mSPHK1; as a C-terminally myc-tagged version) was incubated with whole-cell lysates, generated from IgE-Ag-stimulated BMMC, and allowed to form possible complexes with proteins in these lysates. This mixture was then incubated with an Ab array harboring about 500 defined monoclonal Abs to a variety of signaling molecules. This array included an Ab directed to the myc tag of the in vitro transcribed and translated mSPHK1, which served as a positive control recognizing the radiolabeled enzyme directly (Fig. 1A). Four additional spots were also detected in this experiment (Fig. 1A). These additional spots had diminished intensity (fivefold less) in signal strength compared to the positive control, which may be attributed to indirect (Ab/protein/protein) versus direct (Ab/protein) interaction. Nonetheless, other factors such as the concentration of the respective proteins in the mast cell extracts and the affinity of the interactions may influence the signal intensity. The four potential interacting partners were identified as Sam68, Bin-1, clathrin, and Lyn tyrosine kinase (Fig. 1A). Due to the established pivotal role of Lyn tyrosine kinase as a central signaling molecule (10) in mast cell activation by IgE-Ag, we concentrated on investigating this relationship. The specificity of the SPHK/Lyn interaction was notable, since this Ab array also harbors a variety of Abs to additional tyrosine kinases like Syk, Yes, and c-Src that are known to be expressed in mast cells (see Fig. 1A) (10). That these additional kinase-specific antibodies served as an appropriate specificity control for SPHK1/Lyn interaction was demonstrated by the fact that with the same Ab array, Syk protein and its phosphorylation after stimulation of BMMC is easily visualized (E. Bofill-Cardona, unpublished data). Longer exposures of the autoradiogram of the Ab array revealed the presumably weaker interaction of Fyn and Lck with SPHK1. This indicates a potential interaction of SPHK with these two kinases, which merits future exploration. Other kinases such as Blk, c-Fgr, Syk, c-Src, and c-Yes, however, showed no interaction upon longer exposures.
|
Next we studied this interaction in a cellular context by transient transfection of murine or human SPHK1 with mLyn into HeLa cells. Figure 2A (lanes 1 and 2) shows that the anti-myc tag Ab, used to detect SPHK, and the anti-Lyn Ab did not cross-react with other proteins in the HeLa cell lysate. Adequate expression of both molecules was seen after 48 h of transfection (Fig. 2A, lanes 3 and 4). Both SPHK and Lyn were expressed simultaneously in HeLa cells (Fig. 2A, lane 5). By using this experimental setting, an IP of mLyn showed the co-IP of SPHK, with the specific enzymatic conversion of S to S1P as a sensitive assay for SPHK detection. As can be seen in Fig. 2B, a significantly enhanced enzymatic activity was coprecipitated with Ab to Lyn only when Lyn is cotransfected with mSPHK1 in HeLa cells (compare lanes 4 and 5, Fig. 2B). Since human SPHK1 cotransfected with mLyn gave similar results (Fig. 2C), this interaction is evolutionary conserved. The specificity of this highly sensitive assay was tested by coexpression of mp53 with mSPHK1. As can be seen by Western blotting (Fig. 2D, lanes 1 to 4), transfection of the corresponding expression plasmids of mp53 and mSPHK1 into the HeLa cells results in enhanced expression of both proteins. However, as expected from the in vitro results in Fig. 1B, SPHK activity was not enhanced beyond control levels in an IP of p53 (compare lanes 7 and 8, Fig. 2D). These data confirm the SPHK/Lyn interaction observed in the in vitro transcription and translation studies by demonstrating that this specific interaction is maintained in a cellular context.
|
RI, which initiates IgE-dependent mast cell activation. Lyn kinase associates with the Fc
RI ß-chain and is further recruited upon stimulation of this receptor. Therefore, we investigated whether Lyn might recruit SPHK to Fc
RI. We used a recently established genetically engineered HeLa cell line that harbors the human
-chain (fused to a Flag tag), with its expression being inducibly controlled by a doxycycline-dependent promoter (1). In addition, this cell line expresses the human Fc
RI
- (myc-tagged) and ß-chain, but only upon
-chain induction can the tetrameric Fc
RI be expressed on the cell surface (1). This allowed us to investigate the relationship between cell surface expression of Fc
RI and its association with Lyn and SPHK in a cell system that is normally devoid of surface Fc
RI or Lyn expression. Figure 3A shows the kinetics of Fc
RI
induction by doxycycline; its expression was detected (by anti-FLAG or anti-
Ab) within 24 h, peaking at 48 h postinduction and remaining relatively unchanged through 72 h. Subsequent experiments employed cells 48 to 72 h postinduction and conditions of low detergent concentrations for cell solubilization to favor Fc
RI subunit association. Transient transfection of these cells, either induced to express Fc
RI
or not, with mSPHK1 alone or in combination with mLyn showed that SPHK activity was coprecipitated with Ab to Fc
RI
only when the
-chain is induced by doxycycline (Fig. 3B, lanes 3 and 4). This coprecipitated SPHK activity was also dependent on the presence of Lyn kinase, since SPHK activity was only detected when mLyn was cotransfected (compare lanes 5 and 6, Fig. 3B). This shows that Lyn is required for the co-IP of SPHK activity with Fc
RI, thus eliminating the possibility that IP of Fc
RI caused the nonspecific co-IP of SPHK.
|
RI, Lyn, and SPHK might exist by assessing whether increased SPHK activity occurs upon Fc
RI stimulation. This might also reveal whether Lyn/SPHK1 binding to Fc
RI is directly linked to the described increase of SPHK activity after Fc
RI stimulation. However, it had to be considered that in this heterologous HeLa system, Fc
RI stimulation might fail to increase SPHK activity because of the absence of the appropriate signaling molecules in this cell. Nonetheless, as seen in Fig. 3C, IgE-Ag caused an additional increase of Fc
RI-associated SPHK1 activity in the HeLa cells that was similar to that seen in IgE-dependent mast cell activation. Stimulation of Fc
RI (Fig. 3C, even lanes) clearly enhanced the receptor-associated lipid kinase activity that was coimmunoprecipitated with Fc
RI (compare anti-Flag IP [lanes 1 to 2] and anti-
-chain IP [lanes 3 to 4]). To ensure that the observed IgE-Ag-dependent increase in SPHK activity was indeed Fc
RI specific (since the Fc
RI
is shared with mast cell-expressed Fc
RIII), we first exchanged the mSPHK1 construct (myc tagged) for the human version (hSPHK1, Flag tagged), which allowed the IP of the stably expressed Fc
RI
-chain (that was myc tagged) and measurement of any associated SPHK activity. As seen in Fig. 3C (lanes 5 and 6), the Fc
RI
-associated SPHK activity was strongly increased upon IgE-Ag stimulation (approximately fourfold). That the intact Fc
RI was successfully immunoprecipitated (under the low detergent solubilization conditions used) is demonstrated by probing with Ab to the
-chain. While in this experiment a modest increase (1.5-fold) in the detected
-chain was observed after Fc
RI stimulation, this was variable among experiments, whereas the SPHK activity was always increased. Together, with the data shown in Fig. 3B, the findings provide a clear demonstration of the Lyn-dependent recruitment of SPHK to the Fc
RI and show that SPHK activity is increased in an Fc
RI stimulation-dependent manner (see also Fig. 7).
|
|
RI, and that IgE-Ag cross-linking of Fc
RI caused increased Fc
RI-associated SPHK1 activity. Thus, we wished to address the functional consequence of Lyn/SPHK1 interaction. Specifically, we aimed to explore whether the interaction of these proteins resulted in increased or decreased activity of one or both. To accomplish this goal we utilized highly purified recombinant Lyn and SPHK1, which were allowed to form a complex in vitro. Preliminary enzymatic assays using serial dilutions (3.3-fold) established concentrations of these proteins in which enzyme kinetics were linear (data not shown). Figure 5A shows that the SPHK1 activity was significantly stimulated when hLyn was added to the reaction to form a complex. This contrasted with the reduced SPHK1 activity in the absence of hLyn. Particularly, at low concentrations of SPHK1 alone (0.023 nM), SPHK1 activity was not observed but was detected only upon addition of hLyn (Fig. 5A, lanes 11 and 12). It is noteworthy that phosphorylation of hSPHK1 by hLyn was not observed (data not shown). By using similar assay conditions, the autophosphorylation of Lyn kinase (Fig. 5B, lanes 1, 2, and 3) and its activity as measured by phosphorylation of a peptidic substrate (Fig. 5C, lanes 1 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 6) and phosphorylation of
-chain (Fig. 5D, lanes 1 to 2 and 3 to 4) were also significantly enhanced. To show that the stimulation of lipid (SPHK1) and tyrosine (Lyn) kinase activities was not simply due to a protein concentration effect, the experiments represented in Fig. 5A and C were repeated, but identical concentrations of highly purified c-Jun protein were substituted for hLyn (Fig. 5E, top panel) or for hSPHK1 (Fig. 5E, bottom panel). In neither case did the substitution of c-Jun result in enhancement of the respective activities (Lyn and SPHK1, Fig. 5E, lanes 7 and 8 or 14 and 15). This confirmed that the increased activity of Lyn and SPHK1 is a result of the specific interaction between the two kinases.
|
RI engagement, additional recruitment of Lyn kinase into lipid raft domains has been observed (11). This coincides with the movement of Fc
RI into these domains (11, 12). Lyn recruitment into these domains can be influenced by treatment of mast cells with exogenous sphingolipids (38), demonstrating the importance of sphingolipids to these specialized domains. Since sphingolipids can be metabolized to generate S, the substrate of SPHK1, we investigated whether S itself might also interact with Lyn and influence its activity. As seen in Fig. 6A, dot blots to assess S binding revealed that Lyn kinase can bind S with an affinity comparable to known S binders such as SPHK and PKC. This interaction is specific since the highly homologous hFyn kinase and other cell signaling proteins like hErk and hc-Jun failed to bind the radiolabeled S. These data strongly support the notion that Lyn kinase activity might be regulated by changes in the S:S1P content. Therefore, we investigated the influence of S and S1P on Lyn activity when Lyn is present alone or in a complex with SPHK. Figure 6B, lanes 3 and 5, once again demonstrate the influence of SPHK/Lyn complex formation in increasing Lyn activity as measured by phosphorylation of a peptidic substrate. Interestingly, the addition of S to Lyn alone (Fig. 6B, lanes 3 and 4) also caused increased Lyn kinase activity. Moreover, the enhancement of Lyn kinase activity by S is further augmented when SPHK is present (Fig. 6B, lanes 5 and 6). This shows that S, which is the substrate for SPHK, has a positive influence on the Lyn/SPHK complex activity. In contrast, S1P has a negative influence on the kinase activity of Lyn (Fig. 6B, compare lanes 3 to 1 and 5 to 2). While there is a slight increase of Lyn activity when complexed to SPHK in the presence of S1P (Fig. 6B, lanes 1 to 2), this increase is minimal compared to the activity seen in the absence of S1P (Fig. 6B, lanes 2 to 5). That the stimulatory effect of S on Lyn kinase activity is specific and not an effect of lipids in general is further demonstrated by the fact that closely related derivatives of S (galactosyl- and glucosyl-S) that have a higher tendency to form micelles failed to enhance Lyn kinase activity (Fig. 6B, lanes 7 to 9). Furthermore, S is already known to specifically stimulate casein kinase II, epidermal growth factor receptor kinase, and 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1. Thus, we now can add Lyn kinase to the growing list of molecules for which S is a positive effector (8, 18, 22, 23). In the general context of the rheostat hypothesis, these data suggest that binding to SPHK and/or S directly activates Lyn while the SPHK-mediated local change from nonphosphorylated to phosphorylated (S to S1P) sphingolipids might comprise a negative feedback loop in Lyn activation. To further explore this feedback hypothesis, we repeated the above experiment but instead added S and S1P simultaneously, as inhibition by S1P of Lyn activity would be expected to be dominant if the negative feedback hypothesis was viable. As seen in Fig. 6C (compare lanes 1 and 2 for the S induction and lanes 2 to 4 for the effect of S1P on S induction), the S-enhanced Lyn activity is downregulated by S1P. Upon the simultaneous addition of S and S1P, the activity of Lyn is similar to that seen in the absence of S. This strongly supports the proposed hypothesis of regulatory control of Lyn activity by these two sphingolipids.
|
RI
-chain in the lipid raft fraction (20%) and also in the 30% sucrose fraction (Fig. 7A, compare lanes 1 to 2 and 4 to 5). Successful partitioning of lipid rafts is shown by the relative distribution of the known lipid raft resident protein, LAT, and the minor presence of the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K, as well as the relative distribution of Fc
RI prior to and after stimulation with Ab to the
-chain (Fig. 7A).
To further confirm this finding, we repeated these experiments using primary BMMC (Fig. 7B). If we specifically measured the Fc
RI-associated SPHK activity by
-chain IPs from the different sucrose fractions and normalized it to
-chain content of the IPs, an induced SPHK activity is predominant in the lipid rafts (20%) after 5 and 15 min of stimulation (Fig. 7B, compare lanes 1 and 2). While in some experiments a minor induction was also seen in the 30% fraction, this was variable and entirely dependent on the level of SPHK activity observed in the nonstimulated control (Fig. 7A, compare lanes 4 and 5). Nonetheless, in repeated experiments this induction was not statistically meaningful with respect to Fc
RI-associated SPHK activity (Fig. 7B, 30% fraction quantitation). Therefore, BMMC specifically show a strong induction (up to 10-fold) of Fc
RI-associated SPHK activity in the 20% fraction after stimulation by IgE-Ag (Fig. 7B, bottom left panel). In contrast, no increase in Fc
RI-associated SPHK activity is detected in the other fractions (Fig. 7B, middle panel and right panel).
These results suggest that the IgE-Ag activation of mast cells should cause an increase in Lyn-associated SPHK activity that might also be detected by Lyn IP. To test this possibility we stimulated BMMC with IgE-Ag, and endogenous Lyn was isolated by IP and assayed for SPHK activity. As shown in Fig. 8A (lanes 1 and 2) 1 min of stimulation by IgE-Ag led to an almost fivefold increase in Lyn-associated SPHK activity. In contrast, the IP of LAT, which is also lipid raft localized (Fig. 7A), under identical conditions showed minimal SPHK activity and no induction upon Fc
RI stimulation (Fig. 8A, lanes 3 and 4, see bar graph for quantitation). This demonstrates that the observed SPHK and Lyn interaction and its regulatory control on SPHK activation upon IgE-Ag stimulation is not just merely a consequence of co-IP of proteins colocalized to lipid raft domains. Moreover, it demonstrated that SPHK is functionally associated with Lyn in a cellular context. To further test the importance of Lyn to SPHK1 activity, BMMC were derived from Lyn/ and syngeneic wild-type mice and the kinetics of SPHK1 activity was measured. Buffer conditions used in the graph shown in Fig. 8B were selective for SPHK1 (for conditions, see reference 4) since this isoform was the focus of our in vitro studies. However, it should be noted that BMMC express mRNA for both SPHK1 and SPHK2 (16; also D. Mechtcheriakova, unpublished data). Figure 8B shows the biphasic stimulation (shown as n-fold induction) of SPHK1-dependent lipid kinase activity in mast cells derived from wild-type mice. Exhaustive analysis faithfully reproduced this profile of SPHK1 activation. In comparison, mast cells derived from Lyn/ mice clearly lacked the first (early) peak of SPHK1 activity. This finding was consistent in all experiments, and the differences were highly significant (six to eight experiments, P < 0.0001). Moreover, the basal SPHK1 activity in wild-type and Lyn/ cells did not differ significantly (Fig. 8B, bottom panel, 0 min). In contrast, upon IgE-Ag stimulation the induction of SPHK1 activity in Lyn/ BMMC was significantly delayed compared to wild-type cells (Fig. 8B, bottom panel, 0.5 and 10 min). Further fractionation to recover primarily membranes confirmed the induction of SPHK1 activity in membranes, in line with previous findings by Melendez and Khaw (25). However, the relative level of SPHK1 induction in BMMC membranes was much less than that observed by Melendez and colleagues in human mast cells (Fig. 7A; also A. Olivera, unpublished data).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-mediated Ca2+ mobilization (7). Melendez and Khaw recently extended these studies by demonstrating that in mast cells translocation of SPHK1 could occur rapidly (1 min) following IgE-Ag stimulation and that SPHK1 activity was associated with the major increase in intracellular Ca2+ and was linked to mast cell degranulation (25). Based on these findings, the activation of SPHK activity in mast cells is likely to be a very early event, preceding PLC
and classical and novel PKC activation. While it is logical that the cytoplasmic-localized SPHK has to be brought to its substrate(s) at the cell membrane (25), this movement must occur quickly, given the early peak (0.5 to 3 min) we observed in BMMC. In contrast, the late peak (15 to 20 min) of SPHK1 activity correlates well with the kinetics of the PKC-dependent translocation described in HEK 293 cells (15). Regardless, it should be noted that our studies in BMMC showed that only a small fraction of the total cellular SPHK1 was found to translocate at early times to the plasma membrane (
5%). This differs from the results of Melendez and Khaw in human mast cells (25) but is quite consistent with the amount of Lyn associated with Fc
RI in stimulated cells (50).
Our findings of an interaction of SPHK1 with Lyn links SPHK activation to a primary tyrosine kinase phosphorylation and activation event and therefore places SPHK proximal to Fc
RI. The known kinetics of Lyn-dependent molecular activation in mast cells (i.e., Syk activation) are in very good agreement with the observed first peak of SPHK1 activation in the BMMC. Furthermore, in support of a functional interaction with Lyn, we find that the early phase of SPHK1 activity is absent in Lyn/ mast cells, which also have a markedly delayed and reduced Ca2+ activation (17, 27, 33). Surprisingly, mast cells from Lyn/ mice do not show an impairment in degranulation (17, 27, 33). This disconnect between the proposed (25) association of SPHK activation and Ca2+ rise and degranulation is at first glance contradictory to the reported effects of antisense oligonucleotides against SPHK1, which abolished degranulation (25). However, our findings of an enhanced PI3K/PKC
activity along with increased Fyn activity in Lyn/ mast cells might compensate for the loss of Lyn/SPHK activity (33).
The mechanism of activation of SPHK activity seemingly requires two steps. First, SPHK activity is directly increased by binding to Lyn. This effect is independent from additional cofactors or auxiliary proteins, as the experiments with purified components demonstrated. Furthermore, SPHK activation is independent of tyrosine phosphorylation by Lyn, as this was not detected in vitro or in cellular analysis. This argues that the interaction of SPHK with Lyn most likely induces conformational changes in the SPHK molecule that increase its activity (i.e., generating larger hydrophobic pockets, further substrate binding sites, etc.). The finding that Lyn is an S-binding protein is highly suggestive of this possibility, as it might be expected that SPHK interaction with Lyn-bound S would induce substrate and pseudosubstrate conformational changes because of the availability of substrate. In this scenario, the initial interaction of SPHK with Lyn might provide an increased local concentration of this substrate around Lyn-bound SPHK, facilitating its activation. The second step for increased SPHK activity is its targeting to the appropriate regions in the membrane where S is available. Lyn is known to exist and be further recruited into sphingolipid-enriched lipid rafts prior to and after mast cell activation, respectively (11, 12). It is plausible that plasma membrane-localized Lyn binds SPHK in, or comigrates to, lipid rafts where they find their substrate(s). This hypothesis is in agreement with the enhanced Fc
RI-associated SPHK activity seen in the raft compartment 5 min after IgE-Ag activation. While the overall increase in SPHK activity in the total raft fractions of CPII cells is slight to moderate, IPs of Fc
RI and normalization to the amount of precipitated
-chain in BMMC showed that for the Fc
RI bound SPHK in the rafts, induction of its activity is essentially an all or none process (Fig. 7B). Given that the induction of total SPHK activity in lipid rafts is not an all or none process (Fig. 7A), we interpret this to mean that there is SPHK activity in lipid rafts under nonstimulated conditions that is not associated with Fc
RI (compare Fig. 7A to B). Whether the increase in Fc
RI-associated SPHK1 activity results from recruitment of resident SPHK1 or from the comigration with Fc
RI into the lipid raft domains, following IgE-Ag stimulation, is unclear. Conversely, the enhancement in the tyrosine kinase activity of Lyn seems to be subject to a similar twofold activation mechanism, by binding to SPHK and by binding to S, both of which synergize in this process. Stimulation of kinase activity by lipids is a well established phenomena, best exemplified by the activation of classical and novel PKCs by diacylglycerol but now known to extend to numerous tyrosine kinases. The findings suggest that although lipid raft-localized Lyn kinase may be active in resting cells (51), its activity may be enhanced by its interaction with SPHK and S. This may be an important finding in the context of prior studies demonstrating that the activity of Fc
RI-associated Lyn kinase is unchanged prior to and after IgE-Ag stimulation (35, 50, 51). As these experiments were in vitro kinase assays where SPHK or S were not added, or may not have been present in the IP material, the influence of the latter on Lyn activity would not have been noted. Our findings take into account that both Lyn and Fc
RI migrate into the sphingolipid-enriched raft domains and argue that the Fc
RI-associated SPHK1 activity in these domains is induced upon IgE-Ag stimulation. In this context, our finding that S promotes the activity of Lyn kinase is not surprising but fits well with the concept of the local concentration of S playing a role in inducing or sustaining the activity of the SPHK1/Lyn complex. On the contrary, S1P that is generated by the enhanced SPHK activity (that is directly bound to Lyn) provides a downregulatory signal for Lyn's tyrosine kinase activity. A negative regulatory (lipid) feedback loop controlling Lyn tyrosine kinase activity is also logical, since it was recently found that Lyn exerts a negative regulatory role in mast cell activation (28), and the dissociation of Lyn from Fc
RI (possibly as a mechanism to avoid negative regulation), after receptor chain phosphorylation, has been described previously (32). While all our data are in agreement with an initial stimulatory and subsequent inhibitory role for S and S1P, respectively, on Lyn activity, several puzzles remain; i.e., where does the first interaction between Lyn and SPHK take place (in the rafts or outside)? Is SPHK1 able to phosphorylate S when it is bound to Lyn? Does exogenous addition of S1P behave identically to S1P generated from Lyn bound S? These are experimentally difficult questions, given the fact that addressing them requires the complete separation (without contamination) of the free from protein-bound S and S1P.
The functional role of SPHK1 activity remains an enigma. While its product (S1P) has been associated with Ca2+ mobilization, evidence to the contrary also exists, since inhibitors of PLC
effectively inhibit mast cell and basophil Ca2+ responses and degranulation (44, 45). It should be noted that we also found no evidence for an association of SPHK1 activity with Ca2+ mobilization, since reintroduction of Lyn kinase into Lyn/ mast cells, which restored SPHK1 activity, did not restore the calcium response in these cells (data not shown). This finding was unexpected. However, we cannot exclude incorrect targeting of ectopic Lyn or a developmental defect of Lyn deficiency that is not restored by retroviral expression of Lyn.
Regardless, what is clear from our findings is that SPHK1 and Lyn kinase form an early partnership in IgE-dependent mast cell activation. Previous work (37) established the decisive nature of the balance of S:S1P in Fc
RI-dependent mast cell activation. The present work provides a possible mechanism through the effects of S and S1P on Lyn kinase activity. Additionally, we find that SPHK1 activity is finely regulated by its interaction with Lyn kinase. These findings, together with the observed requirement of SPHK1/Lyn interaction for Fc
RI association, clearly place SPHK1 proximal to the receptor as a regulator of early events. This may be a key function, analogous to the role of another lipid kinase (PI3K), in regulating the activity of tyrosine kinases, lipases, and adaptor proteins among a host of other proteins (6).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The work of J.R. is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Baumruker, T., G. G. Pendl, and E. E. Prieschl. 1997. Gene regulation after Fc epsilon RI stimulation in the murine mast cell line CPII. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 113:39-41.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Baumruker, T., and E. E. Prieschl. 2002. Sphingolipids and the regulation of the immune response. Semin. Immunol. 14:57-63.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Billich, A., F. Bornancin, P. Devay, D. Mechtcheriakova, N. Urtz, and T. Baumruker. 2003. Phosphorylation of the immunomodulatory drug FTY720 by sphingosine kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 278:47408-47415.
5. Brinkmann, V., M. D. Davis, C. E. Heise, R. Albert, S. Cottens, R. Hof, C. Bruns, E. Prieschl, T. Baumruker, P. Hiestand, C. A. Foster, M. Zollinger, and K. R. Lynch. 2002. The immune modulator FTY720 targets sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 277:21453-21457.
6. Cantley, L. C. 2002. The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway. Science 296:1655-1657.
7. Choi, O. H., J. H. Kim, and J. P. Kinet. 1996. Calcium mobilization via sphingosine kinase in signalling by the Fc epsilon RI antigen receptor. Nature 380:634-636.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Davis, R. J., N. Girones, and M. Faucher. 1988. Two alternative mechanisms control the interconversion of functional states of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 263:5373-5379.
9. Edsall, L. C., G. G. Pirianov, and S. Spiegel. 1997. Involvement of sphingosine-1-phosphate in nerve growth factor-mediated neuronal survival and differentiation. J. Neurosci. 17:6952-6960.
10. Eiseman, E., and J. B. Bolen. 1992. Engagement of the high-affinity IgE receptor activates src protein-related tyrosine kinases. Nature 355:78-80.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Field, K. A., D. Holowka, and B. Baird. 1995. Fc
RI-mediated recruitment of p53/p56lyn to detergent-resistant membrane domains accompanies cellular signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:9201-9205.
12. Field, K. A., D. Holowka, and B. Baird. 1997. Compartmentalized activation of the high affinity immunoglobuli