Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2004, p. 924-935, Vol. 24, No. 2
0270-7306/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.2.924-935.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Breast Cancer Program, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland 21231
Received 2 June 2003/ Returned for modification 10 July 2003/ Accepted 6 October 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Apoptosis is largely executed by caspases, a family of proteases that disassembles a cell (2, 16, 28, 43). The caspase cascade can be initiated either from mitochondria (the intrinsic pathway) or through cell death receptors (the extrinsic pathway), depending on the cytotoxic stimulus. The stimuli that are collectively referred to as cytotoxic stress, such as UV rays and chemotherapeutic drugs, activate caspase by initiating signaling pathways that lead to the permeabilization of the mitochondrial membrane and release of cell death-promoting proteins. One of these released proteins is cytochrome c, which in a complex with the cytoplasmic protein Apaf-1 activates caspase 9. Caspase 9 in turn activates caspase 3, the protease that cleaves the majority of caspase substrates during apoptosis. Mitochondria also release an apoptosis-inducing factor and endonuclease G, which appear to kill cells independently of caspases (33, 39). Another way to activate caspases, used by cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
), is to assemble receptor complexes that recruit initiator caspases such as caspase 2, caspase 8 and/or caspase 10, thereby inducing their autocatalytic processing. These activated initiator caspases then activate other downstream effector caspases including caspase 3, caspase 6, and caspase 7, leading to apoptosis (43). The activated initiator caspases in the extrinsic pathway can also cleave Bid, and a proteolytic fragment of Bid can translocate into and permeabilize mitochondria. In this case, the intrinsic pathway serves as a signal amplifier. In addition, DNA damage signals in the intrinsic pathway can first lead to activation of caspase 2 which can also cleave Bid and lead to translocation of the cytoplasmic Bcl-2 family member Bax to mitochondria, thereby accelerating cell disassembly as described above (20, 29).
In this study, we investigated whether p53 activation is indispensable for HOXA5-induced apoptosis and whether HOXA5 can induce apoptosis through alternative pathways. We studied HOXA5-induced apoptosis more closely by using another breast cancer cell line, Hs578T, containing mutant p53 (18, 36, 37). In addition, no endogenous expression of HOXA5 is detectable in these cells. All our attempts to make stable HOXA5-expressing clones in this cell line failed, suggesting that HOXA5 induces apoptosis in this p53-mutant cell line as well. To circumvent this problem, we constructed a tet-off inducible HOXA5 cell line. In this cell culture system, expression of HOXA5 was tightly controlled by the presence of doxycycline in the medium; removing doxycycline resulted in the rapid expression of HOXA5 and dramatic cell death within 24 h. Upon investigating the mode of death in this system, we found that Hs578T cells, like MCF7 cells, die by apoptosis. However, p53 does not appear to be involved in the death of these cells. Instead, these cells apparently undergo death through the activation of caspase 2 and caspase 8. This conclusion was further confirmed by synergistic activation of apoptosis by HOXA5 and TNF-
, since, similar to HOXA5, TNF-
also activated caspase 2 and caspase 8.
|
|
|---|
, TNF-
receptor-1 (TNFR1), Fas ligand, and Fas were purchased from Santa Cruz. The neutralizing antibody to TNFR1 was purchased from Calbiochem. TNF-
recombinant protein was purchased from Roche (Indianapolis, Ind.). The caspase 2 (N-terminal) and caspase 8 antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, Calif.). HOXA5 antibody was provided by Zymed (South San Francisco, Calif.). Bongkrekic acid (BA) and 3,4-dihydro-5-[4-(1-piperidinyl)butoxyl]-1(2H)-isoquinolinone (DPQ) were purchased from Sigma. The small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to lamin, caspase 1, and caspase 2 were purchased from Dharmacon (Lafayette, Colo.). The caspase 8 siRNAs (target 1,5'-CTG GAT TTG CTG ATT ACC T-3'; target 2, 5'-GAG CCT GCT GAA GAT AAT C-3'; target 3, CCT CAA ACG AGA TAT ATC C-3'; and target 4, 5'-CCT CGG GGA TAC TGT CTG A-3') were synthesized in the A4 option by Dharmacon Research. Establishment of HOXA5-inducible cell lines. We transfected breast cancer cell line Hs578T with tTA-IRES-Neo (a gift from Bert Vogelstein) (tTA, tet activator; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; neo, G418 resistance gene) which express tTA in a tet-off manner and selected cells with 800 µg of G418 per ml for 2 to 3 weeks (49). Single clones were isolated. pBI-GL (CLONTECH), a reporter plasmid which expresses luciferase and ß-galactosidase in a tTA-dependent fashion, was transfected into these G418-resistant clones for testing tTA response. The highly tTA-responsive clones were selected for establishing a HOXA5-inducible cell line. The HOXA5 cDNA from pIND-HOXA5 (7) was inserted into the sites of another tTA-responsive vector, pBI-MCS-EGFP (a gift from Bert Vogelstein), which carries a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene, for easy selection of single clones later. The generated HOXA5-expression plasmid (pBI-HOXA5) was cotransfected into the above tet-off clones with pTK-hygro (CLONTECH). Single colonies were obtained by limiting dilution or ring cloning with 400 µg of G418 per ml and 250 µg of hygromycin B per ml (Sigma) in the presence of 20 ng of doxycycline per ml for 2 to 3 weeks. Clones that have low background GFP and homogeneous GFP induction were selected. The expression of HOXA5 was further confirmed by performing Western blot analysis.
Western blot analysis. Twenty micrograms of protein was fractionated in a 4 to 12% NuPAGE gel (Invitrogen) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked with 100 ml of Tris-buffered saline (10 mM Tris-base [pH 7.5], 0.9% NaCl) containing 5% dry milk and 0.1% Tween-20 for 1 h on the shaker at room temperature or overnight in a cold room. The membrane was rinsed once with TBS before being incubated with an appropriate dilution of the primary antibody in TBS containing 5% milk and 0.02% Tween-20 on the shaker for 1 h. The primary antibody-bound membrane was washed with TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 four times and then incubated with the secondary antibody (anti-rabbit or anti-mouse from Amersham ECL kit) of at a dilution of about 1:1000 for 1 to 1.5 h on the shaker. The filter was developed by using the ECL-Plus reagent (Amersham). To prepare blots for reuse, they were stripped with 0.2 M glycine-HCl, pH 2.5, for 10 to 15 min and then neutralized with 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, for 45 min on a shaker, with the buffer changed once after 25 min.
The procaspase 2 and its p33 fragment were detected by using an N-terminal specific monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences) and the p14 fragment was detected by using a C-terminal polyclonal caspase 2 antibody (Santa Cruz).
DNA fragmentation analysis.
A total of 5 x 106 cells were harvested and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times. Equal numbers of cells were resuspended in 500 µl of lysing buffer (5 mM Tris, 20 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100) and incubated on ice for 20 min. The samples were centrifuged at 27,000 x g (
14,000 rpm) for 20 min. The supernatant was saved and the protein was removed by extracting with 0.5 ml of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl (25:24:1; stored at 4°C) once. The DNA fragments were then precipitated with 2 volumes of ice-cold 100% ethanol and resuspended in 0.5 ml of 0.1x SSC (1x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) buffer containing 100 U of DNase-free RNase A per ml at 37°C for at least 30 min. The DNA fragments were precipitated again with 100% ethanol and separated on a 1% agarose gel.
Cell cycle distribution analysis.
A total of 5 x 105 cells were harvested and washed twice with 2 ml of immunofluorescent assay media (1x PBS, 4% fetal bovine serum, 1 mg of sodium azide/ml). The cells were fixed with 70% methanol on ice for 5 min. The fixed cells were collected by centrifuging at 1,400 rpm (
2,250 x g) for 7 min and were treated with 250 µl of RNase solution (100 µg of RNase/ml in PBS) at 37°C for 15 min. PBS (250 µl) containing 100 µg of propidium iodide/ml was directly added into the samples. The cells were incubated on ice for 1 h and analyzed on a Becton-Dickson FACScan flow cytometer by using the CellQuest software.
Annexin V staining assay. The PE-conjugated annexin V was purchased from BD Biosciences. The staining assay was performed according the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, the cells were harvested and washed once with cold PBS. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of binding buffer containing 5 µl of annexin V-PE on ice for 30 min. Binding buffer (500 µl) was added to the sample and centrifuged to remove the unbound annexin V. The samples were then resuspended in 500 µl of binding buffer for flow cytometry analysis.
In vitro caspase activity assay. A total of 106 cells were harvested and washed once with cold PBS. The cells were resuspended in cell lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.4], 5 mM 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate, 5 mM dithiothreitol) and incubated on ice for 15 min. The sample was then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was either analyzed immediately or saved at -80°C in aliquots. Equal amounts of protein measured by bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce) were used in a colorimetric assay for detection of caspase 2-, caspase 3-, and caspase 8-like activity according to the manufacturer's instructions (Sigma). The substrates for caspase 2-, caspase 3-, and caspase 8-like activity were Ac-VDVAD-pNA, Ac-DEVD-pNA, and Ac-IETD-pNA, respectively. The optical density at 405 nm (OD405) was measured by using a spectrometer. The same experiments were repeated three times, and average data are shown in the figures.
siRNA transfection. The siRNA transfections were done as described (29). In brief, 105 cells were cultured on a 6-well plate in 2 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 500 µg of G418/ml, 50 µg of hygromycin/ml, and 20 ng of doxycycline/ml for 24 h. Ten microliters of 20 µM siRNA (final concentration, 100 nM) was mixed with 10 µl of oligofectamine reagent (Invitrogen) for 20 min at room temperature. Meanwhile, cells were rinsed with 2 ml of PBS, and 1 ml of serum-free medium was added per well. The siRNA mixture was then added by drops onto the cells while the plates were gently agitated. After 3 h, 1 ml of medium containing 20% serum was added to the cells. At 48 h posttransfection, half of the cells were harvested for Western blot analysis, and the other half was induced for another 16 h for apoptosis analysis.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Establishment of tet-off inducible HOXA5 cell line. (A) The constructs used to transfect breast cancer cell line Hs578T cells. (B) Screening the stable clones with GFP-inducible expression. Doxycycline (DOX) is the analog of tetracycline. Removal of DOX from the culture medium induced the expression of both enhanced GFP (EGFP) and HOXA5. (C) The time course of induction of HOXA5 expression in HOXA5-inducible clone 10 by Western blot analysis. V0 and V24 represent the cellular lysate which was extracted from vector-transfected cells at 0 and 24 h postinduction.
|
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Induction of HOXA5 expression resulted in cell death. (A) HOXA5- and vector-inducible clones were cultured in the presence or absence of doxycycline (DOX) for 24 h. Cells were photographed under a microscope (magnification, x10). (B) The relative number of viable cells was measured by MTT assay. HOXA5- and vector-inducible cells were cultured in the presence or absence of DOX. Cell viability was measured every 24 h. The y axis represents the relative number of viable cells compared to the number at day 0 when the DOX was first removed from the medium. Since the uninduced cells and vector-transfected cells continued to grow, there were more cells after 24 to 96 h of induction.
|
![]() View larger version (56K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. HOXA5 induces cell death through apoptosis. (A) DNA fragmentation analysis. DNA fragments were extracted from HOXA5-inducible cells harvested at 0, 9, and 24 h postinduction and then fractionated on a 1% agarose gel. (B) Flow cytometry analysis after annexin V staining. The vector- and HOXA5-transfected cells were harvested and counted at 0, 24, and 48 h postinduction. Cells (4 x 105) from each sample were stained with PE-conjugated annexin V for 30 min and then analyzed by flow cytometry. Annexin V-positive cells were shown in the gated box and the percentages were displayed. FSC, forward scatter. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle distribution after HOXA5-induction. HOXA5-inducible cells were harvested at 0, 12, 24, 48 and h postinduction and subjected to flow cytometry analysis. The sub-G0/G1 cell population (M1) represents the apoptotic cells. The sub-G0/G1 percentages were also displayed.
|
-irradiation, no increase in the expression levels of the p53 putative target genes was observed, further indicating that the mutant p53 in Hs578T cells is not functional (37). To study whether p53 is involved in HOXA5-induced apoptosis in Hs578T cells, we first examined the expression status of p53 and its target genes after induction of HOXA5 expression (Fig. 4). Contrary to expectation, we found that the expression levels of p53 and MDM2 slightly decreased in induced cells compared to uninduced cells after the removal of doxycycline from the culture medium, and by 48 h postinduction there was a dramatic reduction in p53 levels. MDM2 was so weakly expressed in Hs578T cells that the specific band became visible only after overnight exposure of the film. The expression levels of Bax, a proapoptotic gene downstream of p53, remained unchanged. The slightly decreased expression of p53 and its target genes indicated that p53 was not activated, at least at the transcriptional level, after HOXA5 induction. Although we did not completely rule out the possibility that p53 was involved in HOXA5-induced apoptosis, it is unlikely that it plays a major role in this case.
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. HOXA5-induced apoptosis is p53-independent. HOXA5-inducible cells were harvested at 0, 3, 6, 9, 24, and 48 h postinduction. Twenty micrograms of the whole-cell lysate were used for the Western blot analysis of the expression of p53 and its target genes, MDM2 and BAX. V, vector-transfected cell lysate.
|
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Z-VAD-FMK inhibits HOXA5-induced apoptosis. (A) Inhibition of HOXA5-induced apoptosis by different concentrations of Z-VAD-FMK. After the removal of doxycycline (DOX) from the culture medium, HOXA5-inducible cells were treated for 24 h with Z-VAD-FMK at concentrations of 10 µM, 25 µM, 50 µM, and 100 µM. The apoptotic cell death (sub-G0/G1) was measured by flow cytometry analysis as described. (B) HOXA5-inducible cells were cultured in the presence or absence of DOX and 100 µM Z-VAD-FMK for 24 h. (C) The relative number of viable cells was measured by MTT assay. At 24 h after growing under uninduced conditions (+DOX), the cells were treated with the following combination of DOX and ZVAD: (i) +DOX + ZVAD, (ii) +DOX - ZVAD, (iii) -DOX + ZVAD, and (iv) -DOX - ZVAD. The relative number of viable cells was measured every 24 h and compared to the number at 0 h. The data shown here represent the average values of two independent experiments with triplicate wells for each time point.
|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG.6. Induction of HOXA5-expression resulted in the activation of caspase 2 and caspase 8. (A) The effects of different caspase inhibitors on HOXA5-induced apoptosis. Casp1in, Z-YVAD-FMK; Casp2in, Z-VAVAD-FMK; Casp3in, Z-DEVD-FMK; Casp6in, Z-VEID-FMK; Casp8in, Z-IETD-FMK; Casp9in, Z-LEHD-FMK. BA was used at a concentration of 50 µM, and DPQ was used at a concentration of 30 µM. All other inhibitors were used at a concentration of 100 µM. The HOXA5-induced cell death without inhibitor treatment was referred to as 100% of apoptosis. (B) Time-dependent cleavage of procaspase (Pro-Casp) 2 after HOXA5 induction. (C) Time-dependent cleavage of procaspase 8 after HOXA5 induction. (D) Time course induction of caspase (Casp) 2-like, caspase 3-like, and caspase 8-like activities. Proteins were extracted at the times indicated, and caspase activities were measured as the absorbance of OD405 with the substrates for caspase 2 (Ac-VAVAD-pNA), caspase 3 (Ac-DEVD-pNA), and caspase 8 (Ac-IETD-pNA). The OD405s were normalized to the protein amounts. (E) Effects of caspase inhibitors on the caspase 2-, 3-, and 8-like activities by in vitro assay. The cell lysates were prepared from uninduced and induced cells and from induced cells treated with 100 µM Casp1in, Casp2in, Casp3in, Casp8in, Casp9in, and ZVAD (Z-VAD-FMK) for 24 h. Each lysate was split into three parts used for the assay of caspase 2-, 3-, and 8-like activities.
|
The failure to inhibit apoptosis by several individual caspases does not exclude the possibility that such caspases are involved in HOXA5-induced apoptosis. The caspase 3 inhibitor could not inhibit apoptosis, but caspase 3-like activity increased by three- to fivefold after HOXA5-induction for 24 h (Fig. 6D and E). Also, the failure to block apoptosis was not necessarily due to the inability of individual caspases to inhibit the corresponding caspase activities. As shown in Fig. 6E, the caspase 3 inhibitor efficiently blocked the caspase 3-like activities. Due to the existence of a complicated caspase activation network, the involvement or contribution of each of these caspases in the HOXA5-activated caspase cascade required further examination in detail.
Requirement of caspase 2 and caspase 8 activation in HOXA5-induced apoptosis. The above results indicated that caspase 2 was one of the first activated caspases. To further confirm the requirement of caspase 2 activation in HOXA5-induced apoptosis, we used a siRNA to caspase 2 that has been shown to specifically and efficiently silence the expression of caspase 2 in other studies (29). As expected, transfection of the siRNA to caspase 2 into the HOXA5-inducible cells substantially knocked down the expression level of caspase 2. In contrast, the control siRNA to lamin and caspase 1 had no effect on the expression of caspase 2 (Fig. 7A). In addition, the siRNA to caspase 2 did not affect expression of other caspases such as caspase 8 (Fig. 7A).
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Requirement of caspase 2 for HOXA5-induced apoptosis. (A) Specific inhibition of caspase 2 expression by siRNA. HOXA5-inducible cells were transfected with the siRNAs to lamin, caspase 1 (Casp1), and caspase 2 (Casp2). At 48 h posttransfection, whole-cell lysate was prepared and used to determine the expression levels of procaspase 2 (Pro-Casp2) and procaspase 8 (Pro-Casp8; a control caspase) by Western blot analysis. (B) The siRNA to caspase 2 inhibited HOXA5-induced apoptosis. The siRNAs were transfected into the Hs578T-HOXA5 cells in duplicate. At 48 h posttransfection, doxycycline was removed (-DOX) from the medium of one set of transfected cells and left (+DOX) in the medium of another set of cells. After the expression of HOXA5 was induced for an additional 16 h, the apoptotic cell percentages (sub-G0/G1 populations) were measured by flow cytometry analysis. (C) Specific inhibition of caspase 8 (Casp8) expression by siRNA. HOXA5-inducible cells were transfected with the siRNA to caspase 8. Four caspase siRNAs whose target sequences were shown in the Materials and Methods section were transfected as described above. (D) The siRNA to caspase 8 inhibited HOXA5-induced apoptosis.
|
Similarly, we tested four caspase 8 siRNAs for their gene silencing abilities and inhibition of HOXA5-induced apoptosis. We found that three out of the four caspase 8 siRNA (numbers 1, 2, and 3) substantially knocked down the expression level of caspase 8, while the number 4 siRNA had no dramatic effect (Fig. 7C). Consistent with the gene silencing function of these siRNAs, transfection of the first three siRNAs produced more dramatic inhibition of HOXA5-induced apoptosis than transfection of the number 4 siRNA (Fig. 7D). Thus, caspase 8 is also involved in HOXA5-induced apoptosis in this system.
Expression of HOXA5-sensitized cells to TNF-
-induced apoptosis.
Caspase 2 and caspase 8 activation after HOXA5 induction is reminiscent of events accompanying TNFR-mediated apoptosis. Therefore, we considered the possibility that the death receptor-mediated pathway was activated by HOXA5. However, we found that the expression levels of TNFR1, TNF-
, Fas, and Fas ligand remained unchanged after HOXA5 induction (data not shown). Further, treatment with a neutralizing antibody to TNFR1 had no effect on HOXA5-induced cell death (data not shown). These negative findings suggested that HOXA5 might not directly activate death receptors or their ligands. Instead, it is likely that an unknown factor, which can transmit apoptotic signals downstream of the death receptor to the caspase cascade, is activated by HOXA5. If this hypothesis is valid, the expression of HOXA5 would sensitize cells to TNF-
-induced apoptosis. Uninduced Hs578T cells were resistant to TNF-
-induced apoptosis at a concentration of 100 ng/ml in the absence of cycloheximide. However, they were sensitive to TNF-
-induced apoptosis in the presence of cycloheximide (Fig. 8A). Very similar to the cycloheximide treatment, the removal of doxycycline from the culture medium and induction of HOXA5 expression not only induced apoptosis but also potentiated TNF-
-induced cell death (Fig. 8B). TNF-
in as low a concentration as 1 ng/ml was sufficient to cause a nearly 40% increase in the percentage of HOXA5-induced apoptotic cell death. The cell death percentage induced by HOXA5 and TNF-
together was greater than the additive values of individual treatments, suggesting a synergistic action between HOXA5 and TNF-
on cell death induction (Fig. 8B).
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Synergic activation of apoptosis by HOXA5 and TNF- . (A) Induction of apoptosis in Hs578T cells by TNF- required another costimulus such as cycloheximide (CHX). The cells were treated with different concentrations of TNF- in the presence or absence of cycloheximide (1 µg/ml) for 24 h and then measured for apoptosis by flow cytometry analysis. (B) Induction of HOXA5 expression potentiated cells to apoptosis induced by TNF- . Cells cultured under induced (without doxycycline [-DOX]) or uninduced (+DOX) conditions were treated with same concentrations of TNF- for 24 h and then measured for apoptosis. (C) Inhibition of TNF- -induced apoptosis by caspase inhibitors. TNF- (50 nM) and 1 µg of cycloheximide/ml were used to induce apoptosis for 24 h. The inhibitors (each at a concentration of 100 µM) described in the legend of Fig. 6 were used. C2, caspase 2 inhibitor; C3, caspase 3 inhibitor; C8, caspase 8 inhibitor; ZV, Z-VAD-FMK. (D) Inhibition of HOXA5- and TNF- -induced apoptosis by caspase inhibitors.
|
and HOXA5, we used the different caspase inhibitors to block apoptosis. Compared to the inhibition effects of individual caspase inhibitors on HOXA5-induced apoptosis (Fig. 6A), several caspase inhibitors shared similarities and displayed some minor differences in the efficiency of inhibition on the apoptosis induced by TNF-
in the presence of cycloheximide. The caspase 8 inhibitor almost completely blocked both HOXA5- and TNF-
-mediated apoptosis (Fig. 8C). The caspase 2 inhibitor completely blocked HOXA5-induced apoptosis and significantly, but not completely, inhibited TNF-
-induced apoptosis. The caspase 3 inhibitor that failed to block HOXA5-induced apoptosis effectively (Fig. 6A) inhibited TNF-
-mediated apoptosis (Fig. 8C). The synergistic action on apoptosis induced by HOXA5 and TNF-
was almost completely blocked by the caspase 2 and caspase 8 inhibitors and moderately inhibited by the caspase 3 inhibitor (Fig. 8D). This minor difference might reflect the fact that HOXA5 and TNF-
have different preferences in the activation of initiator caspase(s). |
|
|---|
.
Caspase 2 was the first identified mammalian apoptotic caspase (48). The exact role of caspase 2 in apoptosis is still controversial. Some studies showed that caspase 2, acting as an effector caspase, was cleaved by caspase 8 and caspase 3 but was not required for apoptosis induction (24, 32, 38). In other systems, caspase 2 acts as an initiator caspase and its activation has also been reported to be required for, and to have occurred upstream of, caspase 3 activation in apoptosis induced by etoposide,
-irradiation, serum withdrawal, and treatment with atractyloside (23, 24, 26, 45, 46). Although there were no overt phenotypes in caspase 2-deficient mice (4), more recent studies showed that caspase 2, as an initiator caspase, plays a critical role in stress or DNA damage-induced apoptosis (29). Since caspase 2 poorly activated other caspases in vitro (47), caspase 2 induced apoptosis presumably through the mitochondrial pathway. Indeed, caspase 2 activation has been shown to be required for translocation of the death protein Bax to the mitochondria as well as for release of the mitochondrial proteins cytochrome c and Smac/Diablo, early steps in the apoptotic program (23, 29). In our study, the caspase 2 inhibitor efficiently blocked caspase 2 activity as well as downstream caspase 3-like activity, whereas the caspase 3 inhibitor prevented caspase 3, but not caspase 2, activation. More importantly, the caspase 2 inhibitor could eliminate HOXA5-induced apoptosis, while the caspase 3 inhibitor had no effects on apoptosis. These findings on apoptosis inhibition suggest that caspase 2 acts as an initiator caspase in our system.
It remains unknown whether caspase 2 is the first caspase activated by HOXA5 since both caspase 2 and caspase 8 inhibitors can block HOXA5-induced apoptosis. It is likely that caspase 2 and caspase 8 were activated sequentially but not independently. The Western blot and in vitro activity assay results showed that caspase 8 activation is weaker and later than caspase 2 activation (Fig. 6B, C, and D). It seems likely that in this system caspase 2 directly activated caspase 8. But this sequential activation order seems to conflict with previously published data showing that caspase 8 can directly cleave and activate procaspase 2 in vitro but not vice versa (47). Caspase 2 substrates remain largely unknown and none of the known caspases can be efficiently cleaved by caspase 2 in vitro; it is unclear whether caspase 2 can directly cleave caspase 8 and other caspases in the cellular context. If not, caspase 2 may activate the caspase cascade through the mitochondrial pathway as shown in other systems, and caspase 8 activation shown by the Western blot analysis (Fig. 6C) may represent the feedback activation by other caspases.
The question raised here is how a transcriptional factor like HOXA5 initiated caspase activation. Actually, caspase activation mediated by transcriptional factors is not unprecedented (27). One previous study has shown that a transcriptional factor, STAT-1, is required for caspase 2 activation under certain conditions (27). p53 has been shown to transactivate caspase 6 and thereby increase the apoptotic sensitivities (35). In this study, HOXA5 did not directly activate the transcription of caspase 2 and caspase 8 at the transcriptional level because, upon induction of HOXA5 expression, the mRNA levels of caspase 2 and caspase 8 remained unchanged (data not shown) and the procaspase 2 protein levels decreased, presumably due to cleavage (Fig. 6B). p53 plays an important role in DNA damage-induced apoptosis, and its promoter has been shown to be directly activated by HOXA5 (41). p53 thus represents a perfect candidate gene which could relay the apoptotic signal from HOXA5 expression to caspase activation. However, in this paper we have shown that the expression levels of p53 and its target genes slightly decreased or remained unchanged. This discrepancy may partially be due to fact that p53 expression is regulated by many factors at several levels. The expression level of p53 will be determined by the availabilities and activities of all of these regulators. In addition, Hs578T cells carry a mutant p53 (with the amino acid substitution of D for E) (37). The obvious change in p53 expression levels was first observed at 24 h postinduction when more than 20% of the cells had died through apoptosis. Therefore, p53 appeared not to play an important role in mediating HOXA5-induced apoptosis in Hs578T cells. We would like to propose a few possible mechanisms through which these genes downstream of HOXA5 may directly or indirectly activate the caspase cascade. First, this molecule may be an unidentified caspase or proteinase which may directly cleave procaspase 2 or 8. Second, there may be adaptor molecules which interact with caspase 2 or 8 analogous to the activation of caspases 2 and 8 through binding to the death domain (DD)-containing adaptor molecules FADD and RAIDD/CRADD (17). Finally, it was recently demonstrated that procaspase 2 is present in the intermembrane space of liver mitochondria and T-cell hybridoma mitochondria but is released in an activated form after PTP opening (45). The HOXA5-downstream genes may directly cause PTP opening and provide support for an autocatalytic mechanism of caspase 2 activation. Considering that the PTP inhibitor BA had no effect on HOXA5-induced apoptosis, the last possibility is less likely. The above theories are based on the transcriptional activation ability of HOXA5. We must also include the possibility that HOXA5 directly induces apoptosis through a protein-to-protein interaction in a transcription-independent manner. In order to identify the mediator of HOXA5-induced apoptosis, we have performed microarray analyses to obtain the gene profiles of induced and uninduced cells (our unpublished data). The microarray results allowed us to identify several candidate genes which have been shown to be involved in apoptosis. Further evaluation and functional studies of these genes are in progress.
The finding that HOXA5 expression sensitizes cells to TNF-
-mediated apoptosis provided other clues about the mechanisms of HOXA5-induced apoptosis. Upon binding to TNF-
, TNFR1 can form a death-inducing signal complex which leads to activation of caspase 8 and thereafter turns on the caspase cascade (21, 22). In addition, TNFR1 can recruit another receptor interactive protein (RIP) which stimulates pathways leading to activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase and NF
B. Although the role of MAP kinase in apoptosis is controversial, NF
B has been shown to be a repressor of apoptosis (21, 22). More intriguingly, RIP can also recruit caspase 2 by interacting with another adaptor protein, RIP-associated ICH-1/CED-3 homologous protein (RAIDD) (17). A decision between life and death after TNF-
treatment is made based on the availability and active status of all these apoptotic activators and repressors. We did not observe apparent cell death even though the cells were treated with a high concentration (100 ng/ml) of TNF-
, indicating that Hs578T cells have balanced death-promoting and survival pathways. Interestingly, TNF-
at a concentration of 1 ng/ml was sufficient to induce further apoptosis in Hs578T-HOXA5 cells in the induced condition. An obvious explanation is that HOXA5 expression had activated caspase 2 and caspase 8, which had tipped the balance toward death. However, we could not rule out the possibility that HOXA5 had blocked the NF
B and MAP kinase-mediated survival pathway as well.
Despite the similarity between the HOXA5- and TNF-
-mediated apoptotic pathways, they displayed some minor differences. That the caspase 8 inhibitor blocked both HOXA5- and TNF-
-mediated apoptosis indicated that caspase 8-like activity is required for both pathways. However, the caspase 2 inhibitor completely blocked HOXA5-mediated apoptosis but less efficiently blocked TNF-
-mediated apoptosis. In both caspase 2-deficient mice and a caspase 2 siRNA knockdown cell line, TNF-
-mediated apoptosis was not significantly impaired, presumably because the caspase 8 pathway is still functional. In the Hs578T-HOXA5 cells, both caspase 2- and caspase 8-like activities are required for HOXA5-induced apoptosis. The individual contributions of caspase 2 and caspase 8 during HOXA5-induced apoptosis have not been completely resolved in this study.
Since all of our studies were performed under nonphysiological conditions, it remains unknown whether this HOXA5-induced p53-independent apoptotic pathway is cell-line-specific or an intrinsic signaling pathway which occurs in vivo. To address this issue, we need to extend our studies to more cell lines or primary tumors. We have shown that HOXA5 expression increased the apoptotic sensitivity to TNF-
. If these results could be confirmed under physiological conditions, one can postulate that the loss of HOXA5 can protect breast cancer cells from immune surveillance, especially to escape apoptosis induced by a cytokine (like TNF-
). We are currently testing whether the loss of HOXA5 expression renders tumor cells resistant to drugs and whether HOXA5 reexpression will sensitize tumor cells to apoptotic stimuli including chemotherapeutic drugs, proapoptotic gene expression, etc. If HOXA5 acts as apoptotic sensitizer, we can develop novel therapeutic strategies for drug-resistant tumors.
Besides its role in tumorigenesis, HOXA5 also plays a very important role in development, such as regulating hematopoeitic lineage determination and maturation. Hoxa5-knockout animals displayed severe defects in the development of axial skeleton, the pectoral girdle, and the respiratory tract, which led to a high rate of perinatal lethality (3, 25). It remains an open question whether HOXA5-mediated apoptosis is involved in these functions. In fact, recently, HOX gene-mediated apoptosis was found to play an important role in development. For example, a Hox-like protein, Dfd in Drosophila, is a direct transcriptional activator of rpr in the anterior maxillary segment. In Drosophila, reaper (Rpr) is one of the three death-promoting proteins that induced most of the embryonic apoptosis (34). Dfd null mutants had abnormalities in the shape and the locations of the mandibular and maxillary lobes, partially due to an apparent excess of cells in the ventral part of the maxillary and mandibular segments. Another example is that of Hoxa13 heterozygous mutant mice, where there is no interdigital apoptosis and no digit separation in 14-day-old embryos (40, 44). It remains to be seen whether Hoxa13 and other Hox genes are direct regulators of apoptotic genes. Therefore Hox-regulated apoptosis is likely to be a general mechanism used to generate and maintain metameric patterns during animal development. In cancer cells, it appears that dysregulation of HOX gene expression may tip the balance of homeostasis against apoptosis and towards proliferation.
This work is supported by a Susan Komen fellowship (PDF0100603) to H.C. and an NIH Specialized Programs of Research Excellence grant P50CA88843 to S.S.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»