Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2004, p. 9079-9091, Vol. 24, No. 20
0270-7306/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.20.9079-9091.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Directs Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor
Signaling in the Transcriptional Control of Energy Metabolism in Cardiac and Skeletal Muscle
Bart Staels,2 Vincent Giguère,3 and Daniel P. Kelly1*
Center for Cardiovascular Research, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri,1 Départment d' Athérosclérose, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Université de Lille II, Lille, France,2 Molecular Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada3
Received 26 February 2004/ Returned for modification 23 April 2004/ Accepted 26 July 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) coactivator 1
(PGC-1
), a critical regulator of cellular energy metabolism. However, metabolic target genes downstream of ERR
have not been well defined. To identify ERR
-regulated pathways in tissues with high energy demand such as the heart, gene expression profiling was performed with primary neonatal cardiac myocytes overexpressing ERR
. ERR
upregulated a subset of PGC-1
target genes involved in multiple energy production pathways, including cellular fatty acid transport, mitochondrial and peroxisomal fatty acid oxidation, and mitochondrial respiration. These results were validated by independent analyses in cardiac myocytes, C2C12 myotubes, and cardiac and skeletal muscle of ERR
/ mice. Consistent with the gene expression results, ERR
increased myocyte lipid accumulation and fatty acid oxidation rates. Many of the genes regulated by ERR
are known targets for the nuclear receptor PPAR
, and therefore, the interaction between these regulatory pathways was explored. ERR
activated PPAR
gene expression via direct binding of ERR
to the PPAR
gene promoter. Furthermore, in fibroblasts null for PPAR
and ERR
, the ability of ERR
to activate several PPAR
targets and to increase cellular fatty acid oxidation rates was abolished. PGC-1
was also shown to activate ERR
gene expression. We conclude that ERR
serves as a critical nodal point in the regulatory circuitry downstream of PGC-1
to direct the transcription of genes involved in mitochondrial energy-producing pathways in cardiac and skeletal muscle. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One group of orphan receptors recently identified as candidate regulators of cellular metabolism are the estrogen-related receptor (ERR) family. There are three members of the ERR family, ERR
, ERRß, and ERR
(13, 16, 18). Early descriptions of the tissue and developmental expression patterns of ERR isoforms in mammalian organisms suggests that they are involved in the regulation of cellular energy metabolism. For example, in adults, ERR
and ERR
expression is enriched in tissues that rely primarily on mitochondrial oxidative metabolism for energy generation, such as heart, brown adipose, and slow-twitch skeletal muscle (16, 43, 47). During embryonic development, both isoforms are expressed in heart and skeletal muscle, suggesting that they serve functional roles during development as well as for maintaining function in differentiated muscle. We demonstrated a dramatic increase in cardiac ERR
expression after birth, coincident with the postnatal switch to fatty acids as an energy substrate and the global upregulation of enzymes involved in cellular fatty acid uptake and mitochondrial oxidation (19). Moreover, ERR
binds the 5' regulatory region of the gene encoding medium-chain acyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase (MCAD), which catalyzes the first step of the mitochondrial ß-oxidation pathway and therefore was implicated in the direct regulation of fatty acid oxidation pathways (43, 47).
Early attempts failed to demonstrate ERR
-mediated activation of MCAD gene transcription in various cell culture models, suggesting that the cells lacked a key functional component of ERR
signaling. Recently, we and others identified members of the PPAR
coactivator 1 (PGC-1) family of transcriptional coactivators as potent coactivators for ERR
and ERR
(17, 19, 21, 42). Three PGC-1 isoforms have been characterized, PGC-1
, PGC-1ß, and PRC. PGC-1
is a key regulator of an array of cellular energy metabolic pathways, but its primary effect in target tissues is to enhance mitochondrial oxidative metabolism (24, 37). PGC-1
increases cellular mitochondrial number, fatty acid oxidation, and respiration via coactivation of a number of nuclear receptor and non-nuclear receptor transcription factor partners (29, 38, 49). PGC-1ß is also thought to activate oxidative metabolism in tissues, though it does so through a relatively restricted set of transcriptional partners compared to PGC-1
(31, 45).
Shared PGC-1
and PGC-1ß partners include ERR
and ERR
, nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF-1), hepatocyte nuclear factor 4, estrogen receptor
, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) (17, 19, 21, 30, 42, 46, 49). Hence, ERR isoforms likely confer PGC-1-mediated regulation on ERR target genes in tissues where ERR
, ERR
, and PGC-1 coactivators are coexpressed, such as heart and skeletal muscle. Indeed, we demonstrated that the ERR
/PGC-1
complex directly activated the MCAD gene promoter through the ERR
binding site identified in earlier studies and that ERR
overexpression activated endogenous MCAD gene expression in NIH 3T3 cells (19). Collectively, the published results to date suggest that ERRs serve as a component of the regulatory circuitry downstream of PGC-1 and have stimulated interest in defining the metabolic roles of ERR
and related isoforms. However, the specific target genes and related metabolic pathways regulated by ERR isoforms have not been defined.
In order to identify potential target genes of ERR
, transcriptional profiling studies were performed in rat neonatal cardiac myocytes overexpressing ERR
. Validation studies were performed in cell culture and in vivo in heart and skeletal muscle of ERR
null mice. These studies unveiled several key regulatory functions for ERR
. First, we found that ERR
activates genes involved in multiple key energy production pathways, including cellular fatty acid uptake, fatty acid oxidation, and mitochondrial electron transport/oxidative phosphorylation. Second, ERR
-mediated regulation of fatty acid utilization genes occurs, at least in part, through direct activation of PPAR
gene transcription, a mechanism that is coactivated by PGC-1
. Collectively, these results identify ERR
as a critical regulator of energy metabolism in heart and skeletal muscle.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
promoter-reporter plasmids have been described (35, 36). The mammalian expression vectors expressing human ERR
and mouse PGC-1
, pcDNA3.1-ERR
and pcDNA3.1-myc/his.PGC-1
, have also been described (19, 46). The pSG5-HA-ERR
expression vector was a kind gift from M. Stallcup (University of Southern California).
Mammalian cell culture and transient transfections.
CV1 cells were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-10% fetal calf serum. Transient transfections were performed by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation method (9). Reporter plasmids (4 µg/ml) were cotransfected with RSV-ßGal (0.5 µg/ml), expressing the ß-galactosidase gene driven by the Rous sarcoma virus promoter, to control for transfection efficiency. For cotransfection experiments, mammalian expression vectors expressing ERR isoforms, PGC-1
, or the corresponding empty vectors were used. Cells were collected and assayed 48 h posttransfection, and luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities were measured as described previously (5).
Ventricular cardiac myocytes were prepared from 1-day-old Harlan-Sprague-Dawley rats as described previously (9). After 24 h, cells were infected with adenovirus expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP), ERR
, PGC-1
, or PPAR
driven by a cytomegalovirus promoter. The experimental constructs also express GFP from an independent promoter. Infection rates of 90 to 95% were achieved by 18 h as assessed by quantitation of GFP-expressing cells with fluorescence microscopy. RNA and whole-cell protein extracts were prepared from cells 48 and 72 h postinfection, respectively. The construction and propagation of adenovirus expressing GFP, human ERR
, and mouse PGC-1
or mouse PPAR
have been described (2, 15, 19, 20, 28).
Primary mouse fibroblasts were prepared from tail tissue of wild-type, ERR
/ (ERR knockout), or ERR
/ PPAR
/ (double-knockout) mice. Isolation and culturing of fibroblasts were performed in complete medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 20% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM nonessential amino acids, and 100 µg of penicillin/streptomycin per ml). In brief, tail clips (1 cm) were soaked 10 min in complete medium with 500 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin per ml, rinsed, and minced in medium with no penicillin/streptomycin. Tissue pieces were digested overnight at 37°C in complete medium plus 500 U collagenase. Cells were liberated by triturating with a 5-ml pipette, collected by centrifugation, and cultured in T25 flasks in complete medium. After 48 h cells were subcultured and expanded to determine appropriate viral titration and used at passage two or three for overexpression experiments.
DNA microarray. Total RNA was isolated from rat neonatal cardiac myocytes with RNAzol (Tel-Test Inc.) followed by an RNeasy kit (Qiagen Inc.) clean-up. Double-stranded cDNA was synthesized from 12 µg of total RNA that was first reverse transcribed with Superscript II (Invitrogen Corp.) with a T7 promoter-poly(A) primer (T7T24) followed by second-strand synthesis according to the manufacturer's protocol. Biotin-labeled cRNA was synthesized with T7-coupled ENZO BioArray High-Yield RNA transcript labeling kit (ENZO Diagnostics Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocol.
The Alvin Siteman Cancer Center's Multiplexed Gene Analysis Core at Washington University School of Medicine performed hybridization to the Affymetrix rat U34A chip. Affymetrix MAS 5.0 software was used for the initial data analysis and background normalization. Subsequent data manipulations were performed in Excel. Probe sets that were called absent by Affymetrix software in both GFP and ERR
overexpression conditions were excluded from subsequent data analysis. Signal intensities were normalized to the average intensity for all probe sets. Signal intensity ratios were calculated as the ratio of ERR
-expressing to GFP-expressing cells in order to detect changes due to ERR
overexpression. Three independent trials were performed. Signal intensity ratios that increased
2-fold (induced) or decreased
0.5-fold (repressed) in at least two trials were considered potentially regulated in ERR
-expressing cells.
Northern and immunoblot analyses.
Total cellular RNA isolation and blotting were performed as described previously (5). Blots were hybridized with radiolabeled probes derived from cDNA mouse clones for MCAD, ERR
, PPAR
, and PGC-1
. In addition, human ERR
, rat M-CPT I, and universal actin probes were used. Protein extracts were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (7.5%) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Immunodetection of MCAD and acyl-coenzyme A oxidase was performed with the previously described anti-MCAD and anti-acyl-coenzyme A oxidase antibodies (7, 22). The fatty acyl coenzyme A synthetase 1 antibody was generously provided by J. E. Schaffer (Washington University School of Medicine).
Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR.
Real-time PCR was performed as described previously (40). Total RNA isolated from the soleus muscle of 8-week-old wild-type or ERR
/ mice was reverse transcribed with Taqman reverse transcription reagents (Applied Biosystems) with oligo(dT) and random hexamers (1:1 ratio). Reactions were performed in triplicate in the 96-well format with Taqman core reagents and a Prism 7700 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). The PGC-1
primer-probe set has been described (3). The following mouse-specific primer-probe sets were used to detect specific gene expression: MCAD forward, 5'-GGAAATGATCAACAAAAAAAGAAGTATTT-3'; MCAD reverse, 5'-ATGGCCGCCACATCAGA-3'; MCAD probe, 5'-TGTCACACAGTAAGGACACATCATTGGCTG-3'; M-CPT I forward, 5'-TCTAGGCAATGCCGTTCAC-3'; M-CPT I reverse, 5'-GAGCACATGGGCACCATAC-3'; M-CPT I probe, 5'-TCAAGCCGGTCATGGCACTGG-3'; CD36 forward, 5'-CGGACATTGAGATTCTTTTCC-3'; CD36 reverse, 5'-TCCTTTAAGGTCGATTTCAGATC-3'; CD36 probe, 5'-ACAGCGTAGATAGACCTGCAAATG-3'; ERR
forward, 5'-TGACTTGGCTGACCGAG-3'; ERR
reverse, 5'-CCGAGGATCAGAATCTCC-3'; ERR
probe, 5'-CATATTCCAGGCTTCTCCACACTG-3'; PPAR
forward, 5'-ACTACGGAGTTCACGCATGTG-3'; PPAR
reverse, 5'-TTGTCGTACACCAGCTTCAGC-3'; PPAR
probe, 5'-AGGCTGTAAGGGCTTCTTTCGGCG-3; PPARß forward, 5'-TCACCGGCAAGTCCAGCCA-3'; PPARß reverse, 5'-ACACCAGGCCCTTCTCTGCCT-3'; and PPARß probe, 5'-AACGCACCCTTTGTCATCCACGA-3'. The rRNA (VIC) probe set was included in all reactions as an internal correction control, and corrected data were normalized to ß-actin expression (Applied Biosystems).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation.
Double-stranded complementary oligonucleotides corresponding to HNF-4-responsive element (5'GATCCTGGAGGGTGGGGCAAAGTTCACCATAGGTA-3') or HNF-4REmut (5'GATCCTGGAGGGTGCAGCAAAGTTCACCATAGGTA-3') of the human PPAR
promoter were used to generate probes to assay ERR isoform binding in vitro. Probes were 32P labeled by a Klenow fill-in reaction. Recombinant proteins for human ERR
and mouse ERR
were synthesized with the TNT Quick T7-coupled translation kit (Promega). Synthesis of appropriately sized proteins was verified in reactions incorporating [35S]methionine followed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis and autoradiographic detection. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay reactions were performed as described previously (9).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed following previously published methods in which specific buffer recipes used in the protocol can be found (4, 48). In brief, L6 rat myoblasts (1 x 107 to 2 x 107) were infected with the adenovirus construct Ad-ERR
. Cross-linking was performed 48 h postinfection by incubating cells with 1% formaldehyde (10 min) followed by addition of 0.125 M glycine to halt cross-linking. Cells were washed and collected in cold phosphate-buffered saline and pelleted by centrifugation, followed by lysis and disruption via Dounce homogenization. Nuclei were pelleted and resuspended in a 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate nuclear lysis buffer. Chromatin was sheared by four 30-s sonication cycles with a Branson 250 sonifier. Aliquots were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis to verify enrichment of the 400- to 1,000-bp subpopulation. Sheared chromatin was precleared with bovine serum albumin-blocked Pansorbin (Calbiochem), followed by dilution of an aliquot in immunoprecipitation dilution buffer and incubation overnight at 4°C with immunoglobulin G or polyclonal antibody against ERR
(43).
Antibody-chromatin complexes were bound with Pansorbin and pelleted by centrifugation. An aliquot from the immunoglobulin G sample was reserved as "input" control. The pellets were washed twice in dialysis buffer followed by four washes in a 500 mM LiCl immunoprecipitation buffer. Immunoprecipitated complexes were eluted by two 15-min incubations with elution buffer. Cross-links were reversed by incubating samples at 65oC for 5 h, during which time samples were also RNase A treated. Samples were phenol and CHCl3 extracted, precipitated overnight, and then proteinase K treated. A final phenol-CHCl3 purification and precipitation was performed to yield template for PCR (30 cycles with standard temperature conditions). Primers were designed to amplify a 310-bp amplicon corresponding to the region of the rat PPAR
promoter flanking the HNF-4-responsive element (nucleotides 1304 to 1613). Primers amplifying 250 bp of the TFIID gene were used to control for nonspecific enrichment of genomic DNA in the immunoprecipitation. PCR-amplified bands were analyzed on a 1.3% agarose gel, and relative band intensities were quantified by densitometry.
Animal studies.
All animal protocols were approved by the Animal Studies Committee at Washington University School of Medicine. The ERR
/ mice have recently been described (32). The original background strain of the ERR
/ mice was a hybrid strain (C57BL/6/SvJ129). For baseline comparisons, littermate wild-type and ERR
/ mice were generated from heterozygous breeders to control for strain background. Heart and skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius and soleus) were isolated from fed wild-type and ERR
/ mice during the daytime (1000 to 1200 h). ERR
/ backcrossed to C57BL/6 were bred with a C57BL/6 strain of PPAR
/ mice (3, 27) to generate doubly heterozygous mice that were then intercrossed to generate the ERR
/ PPAR
/ (double-knockout) mouse lines that were used to isolate primary fibroblasts.
Palmitate oxidation assays.
Measurement of palmitate oxidation rates was performed with [9,10-3H]palmitic acid as described previously (10). Cells (
5 x 103) were cultured in 24-well plates and infected with adenovirus expressing GFP (Ad-GFP), Ad-ERR
, Ad-PGC-1
, or Ad-PPAR
24 h later. At 84 h postinfection, palmitate oxidation assays were performed. To demonstrate the specificity of the assay for measuring fatty acid oxidation, 50 µM sodium etomoxir, a CPT I inhibitor, was added to half of the labeling reactions. Incubations were performed for 2 h at 37°C. Data were normalized for background and for total cellular protein quantitated by the bicinchoninic acid method. Rates were calculated as nanomoles of [3H]palmitate oxidized per hour per milligram of protein.
Neutral lipid detection.
Rat neonatal cardiac myocytes were infected with Ad-GFP or Ad-ERR
for 24 h before addition of 35 µM oleic acid conjugated to bovine serum albumin. Oil red O staining was performed by the Digestive Disease Histology Core at Washington University School of Medicine as described previously (1).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
induces expression of genes involved in cellular fatty acid uptake, oxidation, and mitochondrial respiration.
To characterize the regulatory effects of ERR
on cellular metabolism, ERR
was overexpressed in primary rat neonatal cardiac myocytes and gene expression changes were profiled with the Affymetrix rat U34A array in three independent trials. The criteria for designating a gene regulated by ERR
was a present call in ERR
-expressing myocytes and a signal intensity twofold or greater above that of GFP-expressing myocytes in at least two of three independent trials. Overall, ERR
induced 90 distinct genes, a significant number of which encode enzymes involved in cellular energy metabolic pathways (Table 1). A complete list of ERR
-upregulated genes is available from the authors (unpublished data).
|
overexpression.
As shown previously, the gene encoding MCAD, a key enzyme in the fatty acid oxidation cycle, was increased by ERR
. Additional genes encoding enzymes of mitochondrial (very long chain acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase, long-chain hydroxyacyl coenzyme A dehydrogenase) and peroxisomal (acyl coenzyme A oxidase) ß-oxidation were also activated in parallel with MCAD. A subset of the genes encoding enzymes and proteins involved in mitochondrial electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation were also induced, including cytochrome c, the muscle-specific cytochrome oxidase VIIIh subunit, NADH (ubiquinone) dehydrogenase, and flavoprotein-ubiquinone oxidoreductase. Additional mitochondrion-associated enzymes, such as aminolevulinic acid synthase, involved in heme synthesis, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A synthase, creatine kinase, and aldehyde dehydrogenase, were also induced in response to ERR
overexpression. Notably, components of other metabolic pathways, such as glycolysis and cholesterol metabolism, were also activated by ERR
. However, no metabolic pathways appeared to be more uniformly regulated by ERR
in cardiac myocytes than those involved in fatty acid uptake and oxidation. Finally, a number of muscle-specific genes associated with the contractile apparatus were upregulated in ERR
-expressing cardiac myocytes, including Ca2+-transporting ATPase, phospholamban, and myosin heavy-chain isoforms. Collectively, the results suggest that ERR
upregulates genes involved in cellular fatty acid utilization and mitochondrial oxidation.
The putative ERR
targets were validated by independent analytical methods (Fig. 1). Upregulation of lipoprotein lipase, CD36/fatty acid transporter, and FABP3 in ERR
-expressing myocytes was demonstrated in RNA prepared from independent overexpression trials performed in cardiac myocytes (Fig. 1A). ERR
-mediated regulation of genes involved in mitochondrial energy production was compared with that of PGC-1
, which has been shown to increase the expression of a number of nucleus- and mitochondrion-encoded genes involved in mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and electron transport/oxphos (Fig. 1B) (28). Expression of genes encoding mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation enzymes (muscle carnitine palmitoyltransferase I [M-CPT I, CPT Iß] and MCAD) and the peroxisomal enzyme acyl coenzyme A oxidase was increased in response to ERR
or PGC-1
expression. In addition, ERR
modestly induced the expression of cytochrome oxidase IV, cytochrome c, and ATP synthase ß. Although less robust, these results paralleled that of PGC-1
-mediated regulation. Analysis of whole-cell protein extracts from ERR
-overexpressing cells verified induction of MCAD, acyl coenzyme A oxidase, and fatty acyl coenzyme A synthetase 1 protein by ERR
(Fig. 1C). Collectively, the results indicate that ERR
regulates a subset of PGC-1
targets, mainly genes involved in mitochondrial oxidative fatty acid catabolism or respiratory function.
|
increases cardiac myocyte fatty acid uptake and oxidation.
We next investigated the physiologic relevance of the observed induction of lipid transport and uptake and mitochondrial oxidative enzyme genes by ERR
. Cardiac myocytes overexpressing GFP (control) or ERR
were incubated with oleic acid complexed to bovine serum albumin and stained with Oil Red O to detect intracellular neutral lipid (Fig. 2).
.
ERR
-overexpressing myocytes showed increased accumulation of small lipid droplets. Increased lipid accumulation was also observed at the same concentration of bovine serum albumin-oleate in cardiac myocytes overexpressing either PGC-1
or PPAR
, which were included as positive controls (data not shown).
|
-overexpressing cells compared to GFP. Oxidation rates were inhibited by 85% (± 0.4%) by the CPT I inhibitor etomoxir, verifying that the assay was specifically measuring mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation (data not shown). With the same assay, overexpression of PPAR
or PGC-1
increased palmitate oxidation 41% and 92%, respectively, as expected (Table 2). These data are consistent with the observed effects of PPAR
/PGC-1
on fatty acid oxidation in NIH 3T3 cells (46). These physiologic effects reflect the observed gene expression changes and demonstrate that ERR
increases cardiac myocyte fatty acid uptake and oxidative capacity.
|
gene deletion on in vivo expression of fatty acid utilization genes in cardiac and skeletal muscle.
The ERR
knockout mouse was recently described (32). The phenotype of ERR
knockout mice includes a derangement in white adipocyte lipid metabolism that manifests as resistance to diet-induced obesity. The results shown above suggest that ERR
plays a role in the regulation of genes involved in skeletal muscle and cardiac energy metabolism in vivo. To explore this possibility, the expression of several putative ERR
target genes involved in cellular fatty acid uptake and oxidation was characterized in cardiac and skeletal muscle of wild-type and littermate ERR
knockout animals (Fig. 3). The levels of transcripts encoding MCAD or PPAR
were not different in the hearts of ERR
knockout mice compared to wild-type controls (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, the levels of PGC-1
and ERR
mRNA were significantly increased in ERR
knockout hearts compared to wild-type hearts, suggesting a compensatory response mediated by the ERR
/PGC-1
complex.
|
gene deletion on the expression of the putative ERR
target genes was different in skeletal muscle compared to heart. As a preliminary step, the relative expression levels of ERR isoforms were assessed in the vastus lateralis, which contains mostly glycolytic fast-twitch fibers, and soleus, which is predominantly a slow-twitch oxidative muscle, in wild-type mice (Fig. 3B). Expression of ERR isoforms, PPAR
, PGC-1
, and MCAD (used as a marker of mitochondrial fatty acid oxidative capacity) was significantly higher in the soleus compared to the vastus in the wild-type mice. These results suggested that any effects of ERR
deletion on expression of putative ERR
targets would most likely be observed in the soleus.
In contrast to the heart, transcript levels for MCAD, a known PPAR
gene target, were lower in ERR
/ soleus compared to wild-type control soleus. However, no change in several other known PPAR
targets (CD36/fatty acid transporter or M-CPT I) was observed in the soleus of ERR
null compared to wild-type mice (Fig. 3C). Regarding possible compensatory changes, PGC-1
expression was significantly increased, similar to the effect of ERR
deletion in the heart. However, ERR
and PPAR
were unchanged in the ERR
/ mouse soleus. This distinct pattern of compensatory gene regulation, particularly the lack of induction of the ERR
gene, may contribute to the differential effects of ERR
deletion on PPAR
targets in the soleus compared to the heart. Taken together, the results of the ERR
deletion and overexpression studies support a role for ERR
in the regulation of muscle mitochondrial oxidative metabolism.
ERR
activates the PPAR
gene regulatory pathway.
The ERR
overexpression studies described above revealed upregulation of a number of genes involved in fatty acid utilization pathways, most of which are known target genes for the fatty acid-responsive nuclear receptor PPAR
(8). These results suggested that ERR
drives a metabolic regulatory program that overlaps PPAR
or that ERR
might regulate the PPAR
signaling pathway. To explore this potential mechanism, the effect of ERR
on the expression of PPAR
and related transcriptional activators was investigated.
The PPAR
transcript was called absent in the array analyses, suggesting that this assay was not sensitive enough to detect endogenous levels of PPAR
in cardiac myocytes. Therefore, we used more sensitive Northern and real-time PCR analyses to look at changes in PPAR
expression (Fig. 4). Forced expression of ERR
increased endogenous PPAR
transcript levels 8.3-fold in cardiac myocytes. The ERR
-mediated regulation was most robust for the PPAR
isoform, although we also observed an approximately twofold increase in PPARß expression in the ERR
-overexpressing cardiocytes (Fig. 4B). PPAR
expression was also upregulated by ERR
in C2C12 myotubes. The expression of endogenous PGC-1
was unaffected by ERR
, indicating that the metabolic effects of ERR
were not mediated through the known effects of PPAR
coactivation by PGC-1
(Fig. 4A) (46). In contrast, forced expression of PGC-1
led to upregulated of expression of both ERR
and PPAR
in cardiac myocytes, suggesting a potential feedforward regulation involving PGC-1
, ERR
, and PPAR
.
|
directly regulates the transcriptional activity of the PPAR
gene, a human PPAR
promoter-reporter construct, p
(H-H)pGL3, containing 1,664 bp of the 5'-flanking region, was cotransfected with ERR
in the absence or presence of PGC-1
into CV1 cells. Cotransfection of ERR
alone activated the PPAR
promoter almost fivefold (Fig. 5A). As expected, addition of the coactivator, PGC-1
, significantly enhanced ERR
-mediated activation of the PPAR
promoter. We also tested the related isoform, ERR
, which shares many target genes with ERR
(Fig. 5A). ERR
activated the PPAR
promoter to a similar magnitude as ERR
. Although we have shown that PGC-1
and ERR
form a functional complex (19), the activity of ERR
was only modestly enhanced by addition of PGC-1
on the PPAR
promoter.
|
gene promoter contains two independent nuclear receptor response elements within the 1,664-bp region shown to be responsive to ERR
. The distal site comprises direct repeat 1 (DR1), through which several receptors, including hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 (HNF-4) and chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor I, as well as PPAR
itself, activate or repress the activity of the promoter (36). The proximal site binds the farnesoid X receptor and confers bile acid responsiveness on the PPAR
promoter (35). To determine whether either of the previously characterized nuclear receptor binding sites was involved in ERR
/PGC-1
-mediated activation of the PPAR
gene, cotransfection experiments were repeated with full-length mutant PPAR
promoter constructs in which either the HNF-4 or farnesoid X receptor had been disrupted (Fig. 5B). FXREmut was activated by ERR
/PGC-1
to the same degree as the wild-type promoter. However, disruption of the HNF-4-responsive element (HNF4-REmut) abolished induction of the human PPAR
promoter by ERR
/PGC-1
. Interestingly, the basal activity of the HNF4-REmut construct was 20-fold higher than that of the wild type, suggesting that the HNF-4-responsive element is occupied by a repressor in CV1 cells that is displaced by activators, like ERR
or HNF-4. Despite the enhanced baseline activity of HNF4-REmut, induction by the farnesoid X receptor ligands chenodeoxycholic acid and taurocholic acid, which occurs through the downstream farnesoid X receptor, was still observed, demonstrating that the altered baseline activity does not prevent further activation through other elements (data not shown).
We then sought to determine whether ERR isoforms bound directly to the PPAR
promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with radiolabeled probes corresponding to the wild-type and mutated HNF-4-responsive element and recombinant ERR
and ERR
proteins synthesized in a reticulocyte lysate. ERR
and ERR
bound to the HNF-4-responsive element in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5C). In contrast, the mutated HNF-4-responsive element, which contains the same mutation that abolished ERR
responsiveness, did not form a complex with either ERR isoform. Parallel binding assays were performed with wild-type and mutated farnesoid X-responsive element probes, but no binding to ERR
or ERR
was observed (data not shown).
To determine whether ERR
bound the PPAR
promoter in cells, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed on cross-linked chromatin isolated from L6 myoblasts expressing ERR
(Fig. 5D). Precipitation with ERR
antibody enriched for chromatin containing the HNF-4-responsive element (approximately threefold) compared to precipitations performed in parallel with nonspecific antibody (immunoglobulin G). Collectively, these studies show that ERR
activates PPAR
gene expression via transcriptional regulation through a nuclear receptor response element that is conserved in the human and rodent PPAR
genes.
ERR
-mediated activation of fatty acid oxidation enzyme genes is dependent on the presence of PPAR
.
Our data indicated that ERR
overexpression induces PPAR
targets involved in cellular fatty acid utilization and is capable of directly activating PPAR
gene transcription. Therefore, the observed metabolic regulation in response to ERR
may occur through direct regulation of metabolic target genes or through modulation of the PPAR
pathway. To determine whether certain ERR
-mediated regulatory events are dependent on PPAR
, we evaluated the effects of ERR
overexpression on PPAR
target gene expression in the presence and absence of PPAR
.
To this end, ERR
was overexpressed with adenovirus in primary fibroblasts isolated from ERR
/ (ERR
knockout) mice or PPAR
/ ERR
/ (double-knockout) mice (Fig. 6). ERR
knockout cells were used as the PPAR
-expressing control in order to maximize detection of ERR
-mediated activation of downstream targets. As expected, the expression of known PPAR
targets involved in fatty acid oxidation, MCAD and acyl coenzyme A oxidase, was induced by ERR
in the ERR
knockout cells (Fig. 6A). In striking contrast, expression of these fatty acid oxidation target genes was not induced by ERR
in double-knockout cells. Similar results were observed with an additional PPAR
target, M-CPT I, although induction by ERR
in ERR
knockout cells required coexpression of the ERR
coactivator PGC-1
(Fig. 6B). As expected, endogenous PPAR
was induced in ERR
-expressing ERR
knockout fibroblasts relative to the GFP control (data not shown). In addition, PPAR
target genes (MCAD and acyl coenzyme A oxidase) were induced in response to PPAR
overexpression in double-knockout cells (data not shown). Thus, ERR
-mediated induction of at least a subset of genes involved in cellular fatty acid utilization requires PPAR
.
|
overexpression on palmitate oxidation rates were also measured in the ERR
knockout and double-knockout fibroblasts (Fig. 6C). In the ERR
knockout cells, ERR
overexpression increased oxidation rates by 63%. In contrast, ERR
expression elicited only a 15% increase in the palmitate oxidation rate in double-knockout fibroblasts. Interestingly, PGC-1
overexpression, used as a positive control, was competent to induce palmitate oxidation in both ERR
knockout and double-knockout cells (data not shown), suggesting that another PGC-1
partner besides ERR
and PPAR
is able to mediate activation of fatty acid oxidation. These results, which are consistent with the gene expression studies, demonstrate that ERR
-mediated induction of fatty acid oxidation in fibroblasts requires PPAR
. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and ERR
in the transcriptional regulation of cellular energy metabolism. ERR
is enriched in adult mammalian tissues with high oxidative metabolic capacity, such as the heart, slow-twitch skeletal muscle, and brown adipose. ERR
and ERR
have also recently been shown to serve as functional partners for the PGC-1 family of coactivators (17, 19, 21, 42), which have emerged as key regulators of mitochondrial metabolism and biogenesis (23, 37). We hypothesized that ERR isoforms serve as key regulators of heart and skeletal muscle energy metabolism downstream of PGC-1
. To this end, gene expression profiling experiments were conducted in cardiac myocytes. ERR
overexpression was shown to increase the expression of genes involved in multiple pathways involved in cellular fatty acid utilization, including fatty acid uptake and intracellular binding and mitochondrial oxidation. In addition, a subset of genes involved in mitochondrial electron transport and oxidative phosphorylation were upregulated by ERR
.
Heart and slow-twitch skeletal muscle meet high ATP demands predominantly through oxidation of fatty acids in mitochondria. Our results demonstrating ERR
as an activator of oxidative metabolism in myocytes are consistent with the enriched expression of this nuclear receptor in heart and slow-twitch skeletal muscle. Indeed, ERR
null mice exhibit a compensatory increase in PGC-1
and ERR
expression in heart and a reduction in expression of MCAD, a key fatty acid metabolic target gene, in the soleus, where no change in ERR
expression was observed. These findings strongly suggest that ERR isoforms contribute to the high-level basal expression of fatty acid utilization genes in oxidative tissues.
Consistent with this conclusion, ERR
was recently shown, in a combined proteomic and gene expression profiling study, to be coregulated with proteins and enzymes physically associated with the mitochondria, further supporting its role as a regulator of energy metabolism (33). Interestingly, metabolic function in white adipose, a predominantly glycolytic tissue, is impaired in ERR
null animals and is associated with increased MCAD expression (32). These apparently disparate results support a complex tissue-selective metabolic regulatory function for ERR
, with the activity of ERR
being dependent on the complement of cofactors coexpressed in a given tissue. However, our in vivo gene expression data do not exclude indirect effects, such as metabolic derangements related to the ERR
-deficient state, influencing the expression of some putative gene targets.
We found that the metabolic regulatory effects of ERR
overexpression in cardiac myocytes displayed considerable overlap with those of the nuclear receptor PPAR
. The following lines of evidence indicate that this overlap is due, at least in part, to direct activation of PPAR
gene expression by ERR
: (i) overexpression of ERR
induced PPAR
gene expression in cardiac myocytes, C2C12 skeletal myotubes, and primary mouse fibroblasts; (ii) ERR
directly activated the PPAR
gene promoter in transient cotransfection assays through a conserved nuclear receptor response element to which it bound in vitro and in cells; and (iii) ERR
-mediated regulation of a subset of its fatty acid oxidation targets in primary fibroblasts absolutely required the presence of PPAR
. Specifically, ERR
overexpression in PPAR
null fibroblasts had no effect on the expression of PPAR
targets, including M-CPT I, MCAD, or acyl-coenzyme A oxidase, yet ERR
activated these targets in PPAR
-expressing cells. These results strongly suggest that in tissues where ERR
and PPAR
are coexpressed, like skeletal muscle and heart, activation of PPAR
by ERR
is an important mechanism to control the expression of certain genes involved in cellular fatty acid metabolism.
Collectively, our data and the results of recently published studies suggest that ERR
regulates mitochondrial metabolism through the activation of several downstream transcriptional regulatory cascades. While this manuscript was in review, two studies presented additional evidence for ERR
as a key component of the PGC-1
-mediated regulation of mitochondrial metabolism. Schreiber et al. demonstrated that induction of mitochondrial proliferation and respiratory chain enzyme gene expression by PGC-1
is impaired by RNA interference inhibition of ERR
expression (41), indicating that ERR
is downstream of PGC-1
in regulating certain mitochondrial biogenic programs. Studies by Mootha et al. found a similar role for ERR
downstream of PGC-1
in C2C12 myotubes (34). The latter study suggested that ERR
activates the NRF cascade through direct activation of the Gabpa gene promoter, which encodes a component of the NRF-2 complex. These data are consistent with our findings, which demonstrate that ERR
activates the mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation in cardiac myocytes by converging on the PPAR
regulatory pathway.
Our data do not exclude the possibility that, in addition to activating PPAR
, ERR
plays a direct role in the regulation of certain target genes. The results of our gene expression profiling studies demonstrated that, in addition to the fatty acid oxidation enzyme genes, a number of genes involved in cellular fatty acid uptake and mitochondrial respiration were also activated by ERR
. It is likely that a number of these genes are directly regulated by ERR
. Indeed, our previous work demonstrated that ERR
with PGC-1
directly activates the MCAD gene promoter in transient transfection assays through NRRE-1, a pleiotropic nuclear receptor response element that has been shown to bind both PPAR
and ERR
(14, 19, 43, 47). We also observed modest activation of the lipoprotein lipase promoter by ERR
(J. Huss, unpublished observation). Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated that ERR
with PGC-1
directly activates the ATP synthase ß and cytochrome c gene promoters through consensus ERR
response elements (41). It is therefore likely that ERR
regulates cellular metabolism through multiple pathways, including indirect regulation via other transcription factors and direct regulation of metabolic target genes.
Our results and studies by others have shown that ERR
expression is upregulated by PGC-1
in cultured cells (Fig. 4A) (42) and in vivo in the hearts of mice overexpressing PGC-1
(39; L. Russell and J. Huss, unpublished observation). These results place ERR
in a central position within the PGC-1
regulatory network (Fig. 7). We propose that ERR
transduces PGC-1
-derived signals to transcription factors such as PPAR
and NRFs as well as directly to target genes involved in energy metabolism (34, 41). The extent of the role of ERR isoforms in mediating the actions of PGC-1
on cellular metabolism and physiology is unknown. However, the inducibility of PGC-1
by fasting, exercise, and cold exposure suggests that this regulatory circuit serves a critical role in the physiologic regulation of cardiac and skeletal muscle energy metabolism. Given that derangements in mitochondrial oxidative metabolism occur in pathophysiologic states such as skeletal muscle insulin resistance and cardiac hypertrophy, ERRs may prove to be an attractive therapeutic target for common human diseases such as diabetes and heart failure.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank the Alvin Siteman Cancer Center Multiplexed Gene Analysis Core at Washington University School of Medicine for performing DNA microarray analyses and the Digestive Disease Histology Core for histologic studies. We thank Mary Wingate for expert assistance in preparing the manuscript.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address: New York University Medical Center, New York, N.Y. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
during cardiac hypertrophic growth. J. Clin. Investig. 105:1723-1730.[Medline]
2. Barger, P. M., A. C. Browning, A. N. Garner, and D. P. Kelly. 2001. p38 MAP kinase activates PPAR
: a potential role in the cardiac metabolic stress response. J. Biol. Chem. 276:44495-44501.
3. Bernal-Mizrachi, C., S. Weng, C. Feng, B. N. Finck, R. H. Knutsen, T. C. Leone, T. Coleman, R. P. Mecham, D. P. Kelly, and C. F. Semenkovich. 2003. Glucocorticoid induction of hypertension and diabetes is PPAR-
dependent in mice. Nat. Med. 9:1069-1075.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Boyd, K. E., J. Wells, J. Gutman, S. M. Bartley, and P. J. Farnham. 1998. c-Myc target gene specificity is determined by a post-DNA-binding mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:13887-13892.
5. Brandt, J., F. Djouadi, and D. P. Kelly. 1998. Fatty acids activate transcription of the muscle carnitine palmitoyltransferase I gene in cardiac myocytes via the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
. J. Biol. Chem. 273:23786-23792.
6. Chawla, A., J. J. Repa, R. M. Evans, and D. J. Mangelsdorf. 2001. Nuclear receptors and lipid physiology: opening the X-files. Science 294:1866-1870.
7. Chu, R., N. Usuda, M. K. Reddy, C. Liu, T. Hashimoto, K. Alvares, M. S. Rao, and J. K. Reddy. 1994. Functional expression of rat peroxisomal acyl-CoA oxidase in Spodoptera frugiperda cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 200:178-186.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Desvergne, B., and W. Wahli. 1999. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism. Endocrine Rev. 20:649-688.
9. Disch, D. L., T. A. Rader, S. Cresci, T. C. Leone, P. M. Barger, R. Vega, P. A. Wood, and D. P. Kelly. 1996. Transcriptional control of a nuclear gene encoding a mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation enzyme in transgenic mice: role for nuclear receptors in cardiac and brown adipose expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4043-4051.[Abstract]
10. Djouadi, F., J.-P. Bonnefont, A. Munnich, and J. Bastin. 2003. Characterization of fatty acid oxidation in human muscle mitochondria and myoblasts. Mol. Genet. Metab. 78:112-118.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Francis, G. A., E. Fayard, F. Picard, and J. Auwerx. 2003. Nuclear receptors and the control of metabolism. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 65:261-311.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Giguère, V. 2002. To ERR in the estrogen pathway. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 13:220-225.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Giguère, V., N. Yang, P. Segui, and R. M. Evans. 1988. Identification of a new class of steroid hormone receptors. Nature 331:91-94.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Gulick, T., S. Cresci, T. Caira, D. D. Moore, and D. P. Kelly. 1994. The peroxisome proliferator activated receptor regulates mitochondrial fatty acid oxidative enzyme gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:11012-11016.