Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2004, p. 9736-9743, Vol. 24, No. 22
0270-7306/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.22.9736-9743.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Reproductive Biology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,1 Department of Comparative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford,2 Tularik, Inc., South San Francisco, California3
Received 11 May 2004/ Returned for modification 23 June 2004/ Accepted 15 August 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ankyloglossia is a rare human craniofacial defect associated with difficulties in an infant's ability to breast-feed and defective speech articulation (6, 16, 18). In patients with this disorder, the lingual frenulum, which attaches the tongue to the floor of the oral cavity, extends to the tip of the tongue, thereby preventing optimal tongue movement. Limitation of tongue movement may vary from very mild to complete fusion of the tongue to the floor of the mouth. Ankyloglossia in breast-feeding infants can cause ineffective latch, inadequate milk transfer, and maternal nipple pain, resulting in slower weight gain and untimely weaning. Some cases of ankyloglossia are associated with cleft palate (CPX; MIM 303400; OMIM database, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.) and are inherited as an X-linked disorder caused by mutations in TBX22, a T-box transcription factor gene located in Xq21 (3).
In an attempt to elucidate the physiological roles of the subgroup of orphan LGRs consisting of LGR4, LGR5, and LGR6, we performed gene deletion experiments with LGR5 using a mouse model. Here, we report that the LGR5 null mice exhibit neonatal lethality associated with ankyloglossia characterized by fusion of the tongue to the floor of the mouth leading to the inability to nurse and neonatal mortality.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Targeted disruption of the LGR5 genes and genotyping of LGR5 null mice. (A) Schematic representation of LGR5 genomic DNA, the targeting vector, and the disrupted gene. The LGR5 gene contains 18 exons, with exon 1 encoding the signal peptide for secretion (SP) and the N-terminal leucine-rich repeat domain. Exons 2 to 17 encode the 17 leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains, and exon 18 encodes the seven-transmembrane region plus the C-terminal tail. In the targeting vector, the transgene containing the LacZ-MC1 neo cassette replaced exon 18 of the LGR5 gene, leading to the loss of LGR5 expression in the targeted allele. (B) PCR genotyping of wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (+/), and LGR5 null (/) mice. Triplex PCR was performed with genomic DNA as the template together with three primers. Primers A and C allowed the amplification of an LGR5 gene fragment (673 bp) in the wild-type allele, whereas primers B and C amplified a chimeric gene fragment (467 bp) in the mutant allele. In heterozygous animals, both PCR products were generated. (C) Lack of expression of the LGR5 ectodomain-LacZ transgene in LGR5 null mice. (Top panel) Location of two sets of primers used to amplify the ectodomain of LGR5. (Lower panel) Amplification of LGR5 transcripts (a and b primers, 524 bp; c and d primers, 540 bp) in wild type (+/+) but not LGR5 null (/) mice. The levels of ß-actin serve as positive controls.
|
Estimation of LGR5 transcript levels based on real-time RT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from different organs by employing the RNAeasy kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, Calif.) before cDNA synthesis using Advantage reverse transcriptase (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) and the oligo(dT) primer (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, N.J.). PCR was performed in the SmartCycler (Cepheid, Inc., Sunnyvale, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. To test if the transgene containing the N-terminal extracellular domain (ectodomain) of LGR5 was expressed in the LGR5 null mice, we performed additional reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) by amplifying the LGR5 ectodomain region with two pairs of primers: sense primers a (5'-CCTCTGCTTCCTAGAAGAGTTAC-3') and c (5'TCAGTATGAACAACATCAGTCAG-3') and antisense primers b (5'-CTAGTTCCTTAAGGTTGGAGAGT-3') and d (5'-TTGCAGTGGGGAATTCATCAAGGTTATTAT-3'). The primers for ß-actin were sense primer 5'-GGACCTGACGGACTACCTCATG-3' and antisense primer 5'-TCTTTGATGTCACGCACGATTT-3'. The following primers and probes were used for real-time PCR: LGR5 sense 5'-CTTCCGAATCGTCGATCTTC-3' and antisense 5'-AACGATCGCTCTCAGGCTAA-3', probe 5'-6-carboxy-fluorescein (FAM)-TCACTCTGGCAGCGCTGGAA-6-carboxy-fluorescein (FAM)-CTCTTCTACCTGGCGCTCTGCTTG-6-carboxy-tetramethyl-rhodamine (TAMRA)-3', ß-actin sense 5'-GGACCTGACGGACTACCTCATG-3' and antisense 5'-TCTTTGATGTCACGCACGATTT-3', and probe 5'FAM-CCTGACCGAGCGTGGCTACAGCTTC-TAMRA-3'. To determine the copy number of target transcripts, LGR5 and ß-actin cDNAs were used to generate calibration curves by plotting the threshold cycle (Ct) versus the known copy number for each plasmid template. The copy numbers for target samples were determined according to the calibration curve. To correct for differences in RNA extraction, data were normalized by dividing the copy number of the target cDNA by that of ß-actin.
Expression of recombinant antigenic epitopes for LGR5 and generation of LGR5 antibody. The primary sequences encoding the ectodomain of human LGR5 cDNA were used to predict their antigenicity (14). A region corresponding to amino acids 22 to 141 of LGR5 was amplified from the plasmid containing full-length LGR5 cDNA and subcloned into the pET21a vector (Novagen, EMD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif.). Primer pairs for the selected epitope were designed as follows: sense 5'-GGCAGCTCTCCCAGGTCT-3' and antisense 5'-GCAGAATTTGCGAAGCCTTCAA-3'. Expression of recombinant protein was induced in Escherichia coli strain BL21trxB(DE3) (Novagen, EMD Biosciences) with 1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-ß-D-galactopyranoside at 37°C for 4 h. Recombinant protein with six-His tag was then purified from the inclusion body dissolved in 8 M urea by metal chelate chromatography. The protein was emulsified in Freund's adjuvant before injection into rabbits to generate polyclonal antibodies to LGR5.
Generation of the ectodomain of LGR5 in eukaryotic cells and immunoblotting analyses. A eukaryotic cell expression plasmid encoding the entire ectodomain (amino acid residues 22 to 508) of human LGR5 was transfected into human 293T cells. Clonal cell lines stably expressing a recombinant protein encoding the ectodomain of LGR5, named 5BP, were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) combined with F-12 medium (DMEM/F-12) with 10% fetal bovine serum. After the cells were confluent, media were replenished with serum-free DMEM/F-12. Three days later, the media were collected, centrifuged, and filtered through 0.22-µm-pore-diameter filters (Corning, Cambridge, Mass.). Conditioned media containing recombinant 5BP were then purified by metal chelate chromatography. To verify the specificity of the LGR5 antibody, conditioned media containing the soluble 5BP were analyzed with immunoblots. Samples were fractionated by electrophoresis in a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel. Some samples were pretreated with N-glycosidase F (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, Mass.) to confirm the glycoprotein nature of 5BP. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond-P; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.). Subsequently, immunoblotting was performed with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to LGR5 followed by incubation with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G before immunofluorescent imaging with the ECL enhanced chemiluminescence Western blot system (Amersham).
Gross morphology as well as histological and immunohistochemical analyses. Newborn pups were euthanized with CO2 and fixed in toto by immersion in Bouin's fixative for 16 h before paraffin embedding. Blocks were sectioned at a 4-µm thickness and stained with hematoxylin and eosin by standard procedures. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed with rabbit polyclonal antibodies against LGR5. Substitution for the primary antibody with rabbit preimmune serum served as the negative control. Staining was performed with the Histostain-SPAEC kit following the manufacturer's instructions (Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, Calif.).
Data analysis. All experimental data are presented as the mean ± standard error. Statistical analysis was performed with Statview 4.5 (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, Calif.) software. Data were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Significance was accepted at P < 0.05.
|
|
|---|
Based on the expected Mendelian ratio of wild-type and mutant animals following mating of heterozygous mice, embryonic lethality of LGR5 null mice could be excluded (Table 1). Although no significant difference in body weight was observed at birth among different groups of animals (P > 0.05), all the LGR5 null mice died within 24 h after parturition.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Neonatal lethality of LGR5 null micea
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Tissue expression pattern of LGR5 in mice. Real-time RT-PCR analyses were performed to estimate LGR5 transcript levels in diverse tissues from neonatal (left panel) and adult (right panel) mice. Results are expressed as the ratios between LGR5 and ß-actin transcripts for normalization.
|
![]() View larger version (84K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Characterization of LGR5 antibodies and immunostaining of LGR5 in adrenal gland. (A) Immunoblot analyses of affinity-purified 5BP corresponding to the ectodomain of LGR5. Some samples were pretreated with N-glycosidase to remove N-linked carbohydrate side chains. (B) Immunostaining of LGR5 in the adrenal glands of adult mice. Ab, antibody; C, cortex; M, medulla; R, zona reticularis.
|
![]() ![]() View larger version (174K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Dilated gastrointestinal tract and abnormal craniofacial development in LGR5 null mice. (A) The wild-type LGR5 (+/+) neonates had milk in their stomachs (S), whereas the LGR5 null (/) neonates had dilated stomachs without milk. (B) The entire gastrointestinal tract of LGR5 null mice was dilated without milk, whereas the wild-type mice had a normal appearance. SI, small intestine. (C) In sagittal sections of the craniofacial region, the LGR5 null mice showed fusion of the tongue (T) to the mandible (M), whereas these two regions are separated in the wild-type mice. Identification of similar structures in the upper and lower jaws indicates the sections were taken at the same level. I, developing upper incisor; AB, developing alveolar bone of lower incisor. (D) In transverse serial sections of the mandible region, the tongue of LGR5 null mice was attached to the mandible, whereas the tongue of the wild-type animals in the same region was connected only in a posterior section. Similar sections are reflected by the morphology of the molar teeth (mt), and more anterior sections are shown on the right. (E) Immunostaining of LGR5 antigen in the epithelium of the tongue and the epithelium and mesenchyme of the mandible at E14.5. Ab, antibody. The boxed area in the upper panel is enlarged in the lower panels.
|
|
|
|---|
During embryonic development, the tongue is formed from foregut endoderm and by E13 the distal end of the tongue is freed from the floor of the mouth. Programmed cell death and resorption of the developing skeletal muscle in the ventral anterior region free the tongue, and normally a thin tissue band, the lingual frenulum, remains as the only attachment. Disturbances of this process result in an anteriorily extended and/or shortened frenulum leading to the ankyloglossia phenotype. Findings of ankyloglossia in LGR5 mutant mice together with the expression of LGR5 in the epithelium of the tongue and tissues within the mandible of wild-type animals suggest a role of the LGR5 signaling pathway in proper tongue development. Our immunohistochemical localization of LGR5 in the tongue and the mandible in wild-type mice is consistent with an earlier report based on in situ hybridization analyses (8). At E11.5, LGR5 transcripts were found in the epithelium and mesenchyme overlaying the mandibular cleft. At E13.5, the signal persisted in this region together with signals in the most lateral aspects of the tongue.
Although no cleft palate was found in LGR5 null mice, mutations in a transcriptional factor, TBX22, have been reported in families with both cleft palate and ankyloglossia (3). Of interest, in situ hybridization analyses of Tbx22 expression in mouse embryos indicated that this gene is expressed in the mesenchyme of the inferior nasal septum, the posterior palatal shelf before fusion, the base of the tongue, and lateral region of the mandible (4, 9). Although Tbx22 mutant mice have not been reported, the localization of Tbx22 in the lingual frenulum correlated with the ankyloglossia phenotype in humans. Many different ligand signaling systems have been implicated in craniofacial development. These include several transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) ligands, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), hedgehog paralogs, wingless genes, platelet-derived growth factors, and endothelin-1 (6). Recent studies further emphasized the involvement of FGF, sonic hedgehog, and TGF-ß/BMP ligand signaling systems in palate formation (19). Of interest, both FGF receptor 2b (FGFR2b) and FGF10 null mice exhibited cleft palate and a partial ankylosis of the tongue associated with defective epithelialization between the floor of the mouth and the tongue (22). The present observations of the ankyloglossia phenotype in LGR5 null mice underlie important roles of G protein-coupled receptors during tongue formation and suggest possible interactions of diverse ligand signaling systems during craniofacial development. The present study provides the first mouse model to understand the human ankyloglossia phenotype without associated cleft palate.
In addition to expression in the craniofacial region, LGR5 transcripts have been found in other tissues. Northern blot analysis showed that LGR5 is expressed in skeletal muscle, placenta, spinal cord, and various regions of the brain (12, 17). In situ hybridization analyses further demonstrated the expression of LGR5 in adrenal medulla, male and female gonads, and the olfactory bulb of adult mice (8). The present LGR5 expression analyses, in general, confirmed these earlier reports. However, we detected both LGR5 transcripts and antigens mainly in adrenal cortex, inconsistent with an earlier in situ hybridization analysis showing high LGR5 transcripts in adrenal medulla (8). The basis for these discrepancies is unclear.
In addition to its role in craniofacial formation during embryonic development, LGR5 may also play important roles in adult life. A recent study demonstrated the overexpression of LGR5 in human hepatocellular carcinomas with ß-catenin mutations, suggesting that LGR5 may be involved in tumorigenesis (25). Future identification of the cognate ligand for LGR5 and the elucidation of the signaling pathway for this G protein-coupled receptor could provide a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of tongue development and the physiological roles of this subgroup of LGRs conserved between vertebrates and invertebrates (5, 20).
We gratefully acknowledge Pauline L. Chu for histology processing and C. Spencer for editorial assistance. We thank Lexicon Genetics, Inc. (The Woodlands, Tex.), for providing the mutant animals and the personnel of the Research Animal Facility (Stanford University School of Medicine) for care and monitoring of animals.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»