Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, December 2004, p. 10905-10922, Vol. 24, No. 24
0270-7306/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.24.10905-10922.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology,1 Departments of Psychiatry, Medicine (Endocrinology), and Cell Biology, Mouse Behavioral and Neuroendocrine Analysis Core Facility, Duke University Medical Center, Durham,2 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina3
Received 4 June 2004/ Returned for modification 14 July 2004/ Accepted 14 September 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Actin polymerization provides the driving force for the formation of adherens junctions (69). Adherens junctions are circumferential structures formed during epithelial morphogenesis that connect intercellular contacts at the cell surface to the actin cytoskeleton (54). The assembly of adherens junctions is dependent on the cadherins, a family of transmembrane proteins that mediate calcium-dependent homophilic interactions between adjacent cells. Cadherins are linked to the actin cytoskeleton by
- and ß-catenins, and cadherin engagement leads to activation of Rho family GTPases, which are critical regulators of the actin cytoskeleton (16, 54, 77). Rho GTPases localize to sites of cadherin-mediated cell-cell contact and, conversely, cadherin recruitment to sites of intercellular adhesion is disrupted in some cells expressing mutant forms of the Rho family GTPases (18, 77). The Rho family proteins Rac1, Cdc42, RhoA, and RhoC have all been shown to affect adherens junctions in different cell types (18, 51). Activation of the Rac and Cdc42 GTPases is important for the assembly of actin-dependent membrane protrusions in the form of lamellipodia and filopodia, respectively (16). Formation of lamellipodia by activated Rac depends on the WAVE proteins, which stimulate the actin nucleating activity of the Arp2/3 complex (73). Assembly of cadherin-dependent intercellular adhesions can be driven by lamellipodial or filopodial membrane protrusions (14, 19, 30, 69). Among the GTPases, Rac is consistently activated by cadherin adhesion and is preferentially recruited at new cell-cell contacts, where its accumulation correlates with enhanced lamellipodia activity (14, 77). Thus, Rac activation and downstream signaling may coordinate cadherin engagement to actin reorganization at sites of cell-cell adhesion. However, the mechanisms that link Rac activation to actin polymerization during intercellular adhesion are currently unknown. Moreover, the intracellular proteins involved in the regulation of actin reorganization in vivo during epithelial morphogenesis are just beginning to be identified.
Modulation of actin dynamics is also critical for the formation, maturation, and maintenance of dendritic spines (33). Spines are highly dynamic structures that are rich in actin and undergo changes in shape, size, and number during development and are remodeled in an activity-dependent manner in adulthood (79). Abnormal spine density and morphology have been associated with neurological disorders such as mental retardation and epilepsy (5). Proteins that regulate the actin cytoskeleton are prime candidates for controlling dendritic spine morphogenesis and synapse formation. Indeed, in vitro studies have shown that Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 modulate dendritic spine shape and number (27, 41). Rac activity, in particular, is important for the maintenance of spine density (41), and regulation of Rho family GTPase signaling has been shown to be critical for normal cognitive functions (46). Dendritic spine formation and maintenance are regulated by glutamate receptors and cell adhesion receptors, such as the cadherins and Eph receptors (15, 23, 33, 40, 43, 68). The mechanisms that link activation of these cell surface receptors to regulation of actin dynamics remain to be defined but may involve regulation of the Rac and Cdc42 GTPases through activation of specific guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) (27, 43).
Here we identify the Abi2 protein as a component of sites of dynamic actin cytoskeleton remodeling at epithelial cell-cell junctions and dendritic spines. The Abi proteins were initially identified as binding partners for the c-Abl tyrosine kinase (10, 58). The Abi protein family is currently comprised of mammalian Abi1, Abi2, and NESH/Abi3, Drosophila melanogaster Abi, Xenopus laevis Xlan4, Dictyostelium discoideum Abi, and Caenorhabditis elegans Abi (4, 10, 12, 28, 36, 47, 58). In addition to c-Abl, Abi proteins were subsequently shown to interact with the Arg tyrosine kinase, the adaptor protein Eps8, spectrin, the Sos GEF, Nck
/Grb4, Mena, WAVE, and the WAVE-associated Nap1/Nap125 protein (3, 9, 12, 17, 26, 56, 67, 72, 75, 82). Abi proteins share several conserved domains, including SH3, homeodomain homologous region, SNARE, and the WAVE-binding domain (10, 12, 58, 63). Abi1 has been linked to Rac signaling in a trimeric complex that contains Abi1 (also designated E3b1), Eps8, and the Sos GEF. This complex exhibits GEF activity towards the Rac GTPase (56). Overexpression of Abi1 can activate Rac in an Eps8-dependent manner (25), and downregulation of Abi1 function by RNA interference or specific antibodies inhibits Rac-dependent or platelet-derived growth factor-induced membrane ruffling, respectively (26, 56). A similar inhibition of the membrane ruffling response to platelet-derived growth factor stimulation is observed in mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) isolated from c-Abl or Eps8 knockout mice (45, 56). Thus, Abi1 may function in concert with Eps8 or c-Abl to transduce signals from activated growth factor receptors to cytoskeletal reorganization.
Abi1 and Abi2 were purified from brain lysates in protein complexes containing WAVE proteins (13, 59). In vitro studies with purified components showed that WAVE1 is inhibited by a protein complex containing Abi2, Nap1/Nap125, PIR121/Sra1, and HSPC300 and that addition of purified active Rac releases WAVE1 from inhibition, leading to WAVE1-dependent actin polymerization through the Arp2/3 complex (13). However, recent studies showed that Abi and other components of the WAVE complex are required for the formation of lamellipodial protrusions in Drosophila and mammalian cells in culture (26, 31, 50, 62). Abi1 positively regulates WAVE stability and localization to the lamellipodia in mammalian cells (12, 26).
Here we demonstrate that homozygous deletion of the murine abi2 gene results in cell morphogenesis defects in the eye lens and dendritic spines. Loss of abi2 results in defective orientation and migration of secondary lens fibers, abnormal neuronal migration in the neocortex and hippocampus, aberrant dendritic spine morphology and density, and profound deficits in learning and memory. We show for the first time that Abi2 accumulates at epithelial cell-cell junctions in vitro and in vivo and that downregulation of Abi proteins impairs adherens junction formation. Together, these findings support a role for Abi2 in the regulation of actin dynamics at sites of membrane protrusion in vivo and in vitro.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3-kbp genomic region containing exons 2 and 3 was targeted for deletion. The long arm of the targeting construct was an 8.5-kbp HindIII genomic fragment containing exon 5 and beginning immediately downstream of exon 3. Prior to cloning into the targeting vector (pPGKneobpAlox2PGKDTA), this fragment was modified by introduction of stop codons in all three reading frames, and of SacI, XbaI, and SphI restriction sites, into the EcoNI site in exon 5, which destroyed the EcoNI site. To construct the short arm of the targeting construct, a 1,160-bp genomic fragment encoding sequences immediately upstream of exon 2 was amplified by PCR, using 5' and 3' primers containing NotI and Bsp120I restriction sites, respectively. This fragment was cloned into the unique NotI site in the targeting vector, thereby destroying the NotI site downstream of the short arm and allowing linearization of the targeting construct with NotI. The linearized construct was electroporated into embryonic stem (ES) cells, and G418-resistant clones were analyzed by PCR using a 3' primer specific for the neomycin resistance gene and a 5' primer from the genomic region upstream of the 5' end of the short arm. Confirmation of PCR-positive clones was done by Southern blotting after digestion of genomic DNA with either SphI (external probe) or EcoNI (internal probe). SphI generated bands of 7.5 and 5 kbp and EcoNI generated bands of 2.8 and 3.5 kbp for the wild-type and targeted alleles, respectively. Correctly targeted ES cells were injected into inbred C57BL/6 blastocysts. Chimeric male mice were bred with wild-type inbred C57BL/6 females, and two F1 lines were obtained that contained the correctly targeted Abi2 allele. Routine genotyping was carried out by PCR. Mice were backcrossed to the C57BL/6 strain, and F5 to F7 offspring were used for analyses. Plasmids. The Abi2B cDNA was cloned into the BamHI site of the pLEGFP-C1 retroviral vector (Clontech). Constructs were sequenced prior to use.
Cell culture. Primary MEFs were obtained from embryonic day 13.5 (E13.5) embryos and were immortalized using a standard 3T3 protocol. MEF, MDCK, HeLa, and 293T cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. For cell-cell junction formation and cell spreading assays, 105 MDCK cells were plated onto glass coverslips precoated with collagen IV (Gibco). Primary neurons, obtained from E17.5 cortex or postnatal day 2 (P2) hippocampus, were plated on glass coverslips coated with poly(D-lysine) (100 µg/ml)-laminin (10 µg/ml) or poly(D-lysine) (1 mg/ml), respectively. Cells were grown in neurobasal medium containing B27 supplement, Glutamax, and 1 µg of gentamicin (Gibco)/ml.
Cell transfection and infection. 293T cells were transfected using a standard calcium phosphate method. Infection of MDCK cells was essentially as described elsewhere (48). Briefly, 293T cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding gag-pol, vesicular stomatitis virus G glycoprotein (48), and the pLEGFP retroviral vector alone or the pLEGFP-Abi2B construct. The virus-containing medium was supplemented with 4 µg of Polybrene (Sigma)/ml, filtered through 0.45-µm-pore-size filters, and used to infect MDCK cells. Two days postinfection, MDCK cells were sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were transfected using Oligofectamine (Invitrogen). Synthetic siRNAs (Dharmacon) for human Abi2B spanned nucleotides 387 to 405 (Abi2.1) or 495 to 513 (Abi2.2), and the siRNA (Dharmacon) for human Abi1 spanned nucleotides 169 to 187.
Antibodies.
The anti-Abi2 (5421) and anti-Abi1 (6987) rabbit polyclonal antibodies have been previously described (8). Other antibodies used were the following: mouse monoclonal antibodies anti-
-catenin and anti-ß-catenin (Transduction Laboratories), anti-E-cadherin 3G8 (gift from W. James Nelson, Stanford University), anti-WAVE1 (Transduction Laboratories), anti-
tubulin (Sigma), and antibromodeoxyuridine (anti-BrdU; Becton Dickinson), as well as Cy2 donkey anti-mouse, Cy3 donkey anti-rabbit, donkey anti-mouse, and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (Jackson Immunoresearch). The anti-p34Arc rabbit polyclonal antibody was a gift from Matthew Welch (University of CaliforniaBerkeley), and the anti-MIP26 and anti-
-crystallin rabbit polyclonal antibodies were gifts from Sam Zigler (National Eye Institute).
BrdU labeling of mouse embryos. To detect proliferating cells in the eye, 16.5-day timed-pregnant females were injected with BrdU as described previously (39). After 1 h, mice were sacrificed and embryos were removed, genotyped, and embedded in paraffin.
Immunofluorescence.
Cells were fixed for 15 min (MDCK) or 10 min (HeLa) with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4) and permeabilized in 0.5% Triton-PBS (MDCK) or 0.2% Triton-PBS (HeLa). Cells were blocked in 10% normal donkey serum-PBS. Primary antibody concentrations were as follows: 0.2 µg of anti-Abi2 (purified)/ml; 0.8 µg of anti-
-catenin/ml; and 0.5 µg of anti-p34 Arc/ml. Cy2 donkey anti-mouse was used at 1/50, Cy3 donkey anti-rabbit was used at 1/200, Cy3 donkey anti-mouse was used at 1/1,500, and Cy2 donkey anti-rabbit was used at 1/400. For staining of F-actin, Alexa 488 phalloidin (Molecular Probes) was diluted to 30 µg/ml in 1% bovine serum albumin-PBS and added to permeabilized cells for 45 min. Stained cells were mounted using Permount (Molecular Probes) and visualized by confocal microscopy. For immunohistochemistry of 5-µm paraffin tissue sections, BrdU-labeled sections were processed as described elsewhere (39) and incubated with anti-BrdU sera. Unlabeled tissue sections were prepared for staining with anti-MIP26 or anti-crystallin antibodies as described elsewhere (39), except that treatment with 2 M HCl was omitted. Antibody staining was visualized with the ABC complex (Vector Systems), and sections were counterstained with methyl green. For tissue staining of frozen 10- to 20-µm cryostat sections, fixation was carried out with 4% PFA for 20 min and the samples were then processed for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry. For the latter, endogenous peroxidase was quenched by treatment with 1% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min. Primary neurons were fixed for 15 min with 4% PFA and 4% sucrose in PBS and then processed for immunofluorescence and visualized by confocal microscopy. For tissue staining of frozen 10- to 20-µm cryostat sections, fixation was carried out with 4% PFA for 20 min; the samples were then processed for immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry. For the latter, endogenous peroxidase was quenched by treatment with 1% hydrogen peroxide for 5 min.
Time-lapse microscopy. MCDK cells stably expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-Abi2B were plated on collagen IV-coated plates. The following day, cells were treated with 4 mM EGTA for 30 min to disrupt intercellular adhesion and, after replacing the medium with L-15 medium containing 10% serum, formation of new cell-cell contacts was recorded by using a confocal microscope. Images were taken approximately every 5 to 7 min and were processed with MetaMorph software (Universal imaging).
Cell and tissue lysis and immunoblotting.
MDCK cells were lysed in Triton buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris; pH 7.5) plus inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1 µg each of leupeptin, aprotinin, and pepstatin A/ml). MEFs were lysed in NP-40 lysis buffer (0.5% NP-40, 50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol) with the inhibitors listed above. Lysates were clarified by microcentrifugation (Beckman) at 16,000 x g for 20 min. For brain lysates, whole brains were removed by microdissection, placed in TRIzol reagent (Gibco), and homogenized with a Brinkman Polytron 3000 homogenizer. Protein was resuspended in 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Lens lysates were prepared following lens isolation by microdissection. Lenses were homogenized in hypotonic buffer (39). The homogenate was clarified by microcentrifugation at 14,000 rpm, and the supernatant was removed. The resulting insoluble pellet was homogenized in CSK buffer [50 mM NaCl, 10 mM piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (pH 6.8), 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5% Triton X-100, 30 mM sucrose] to extract noncytoskeletal proteins and centrifuged again. Following removal of the supernatant, the pellet was homogenized in RIPA buffer (0.5 M NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris; pH 8.0) and centrifuged. After removal of supernatant (RIPA-soluble fraction), the pellet was resuspended in 2x sample buffer and boiled. Total protein was separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and subjected to Western blotting with the indicated antibodies. Anti-Abi1 and anti-Abi2 sera were diluted 1/1,000. The concentrations employed for primary antibodies were as follows: anti-WAVE1 (0.25 µg/ml), anti-
-catenin (0.25 µg/ml), anti-ß-catenin (0.25 µg/ml), and anti-
-tubulin (0.1 µg/ml). Samples used for blotting with the anti-MIP26 antibody were not boiled prior to SDS-PAGE, as described previously (39).
Brain histology and dendritic morphology analyses. Nissl staining and measurements of brains of E18.5 mice and 2- to 3-month-old adult mice were performed as described previously (11). For analyses of dendritic spines, brains from three wild-type and three age-matched Abi2/ adult mice were impregnated according to the Golgi procedure (55). Briefly, mice were perfused with 10% formalin, and brains were fixed in additional 10% formalin, postfixed in 2.5% potassium dichromate, impregnated with 2% silver nitrate, cut at 150 µm with a Vibratome, dehydrated in ethanol, and embedded in Permount. Spine number was quantified directly with a 40x objective. Fully impregnated layer III and V pyramidal neurons from the somatosensory cortex and pyramidal neurons from the CA1 region of the hippocampus were selected for analysis. Spine density was obtained in different lengths of side branches from apical dendrites in layer V and the CA1 region and from basal dendrites in layer III (10 to 25 segments, with lengths of 10 to 160 µm). Data obtained for wild-type and Abi2/ mice were compared by a Student's t test analysis (two-tailed P < 0.05).
Behavioral tests.
Experiments were performed using F5 or F7 offspring bred to C57BL/6 mice, and results obtained were the same for the F5 and F7 offspring. Initial neurophysiological and visual screens to assess gross appearance as well as rudimentary sensory, motor, and visual functions were conducted as described elsewhere (49). Since the Abi2 null mice showed abnormalities in lens development, pupillary responses were evaluated. A 1.13-W halogen prefocused penlight (Brinkmann, Westbury, N.Y.) was aimed into the pupil of the eye for 3 s. This test was repeated three times for each mouse with a 5-s interval between each trial. Tests were videotaped, and digitized videos were scored frame by frame for the absence or presence of the response. These and the neurophysiological data were analyzed by
2 tests. To determine whether the mice could visually track a moving object, animals were placed into a circular arena (25 cm in diameter by 28 cm high) and acclimated for 2 min. Animals were presented with a black and white patterned infant feeding spoon that was moved at the eye level along the inside perimeter of the arena over 12 s. Each second was scored for orientation towards the object over 10 trials. Orientations included looking at or fixating on the object, sniffing, grabbing, or biting the moving object or rapidly withdrawing from the moving object accompanied by turning and watching the object approach. To ascertain whether the mice could discriminate a dark from light environment, animals were individually placed into the illuminated half of a passive avoidance chamber (Med Associates, St. Albans, Vt.) with free access to the light and dark chambers for 5 min. The latency to enter the dark chamber and the time spent in each chamber were measured. To examine rudimentary learning and memory, another group of animals was tested in passive avoidance. Mice were placed into the illuminated side, the door was opened to the darkened chamber after 5 s, and the latency to enter the darkened chamber was recorded (all four paws within the darkened compartment). Upon entering the chamber, the door was closed, and after a 10-s interval, the mouse was administered three 2-s scrambled foot shocks (0.4 mA), each separated by a 30-s interval. Performance was evaluated at 30 min, 1 h, or 24 h later. Mice that did not cross within 5 min were removed from the chamber, and the latency was recorded as 300 s. The visual orientation, dark-light discrimination, and passive avoidance data were subjected to analysis of variance tests and Bonferroni a posteriori comparisons. To determine whether multiple exposures to training would improve performance, mice that were originally tested after 1 h were retrained and retested 1 week later (final test). Retention was assessed 1 h after training. To evaluate sensitivity to scrambled foot shock, mice were acclimated to a single chamber for 60 s. Animals were then randomly presented with six different intensities (0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mA) of 2-s scrambled foot shock. Behavioral responses to the shock were scored using the Observer program (Noldus Information Technology, Leesburg, Va.). The lowest level of response that involved the continuation of activity was scored as 0. Other scoring was as follows: score 1 (low-level response), freezing, face wiping or self-grooming, shaking, or rapid forward departures; score 2 (moderate), retreating from shock or tail rattling; score 3, stationary reactive responses, including kicking and vocalization; score 4, locomotor reactivity, such as darting and leaping; score 5, jumping against walls or the ceiling of the chamber. Behavioral scores were summed for each animal and analyzed as a function of genotype and shock intensity.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Defective lens development has been reported to occur as a consequence of aberrant expression of crystallin proteins or as a result of defects in proliferation, differentiation, or apoptosis (38, 42, 81). We investigated these possibilities for the Abi2 null lens. Two lens-specific differentiation markers, MIP26 and
-crystallin (34, 39), were correctly upregulated in primary and secondary fibers in the absence of Abi2 (Fig. 2C and D), suggesting that differentiation occurs normally. Additionally, pulse labeling of E16.5 embryos with BrdU demonstrated that incorporation of BrdU in the lens was confined to the anterior epithelial cells, as expected (34, 39), and was the same in wild-type and Abi2 null lenses (Fig. 2E), thereby showing that proliferation in the Abi2 null lens is normal. Similar levels of apoptotic cells were detected in the retinas of Abi2 null and wild-type mice (data not shown). As reported (81), the lens did not exhibit appreciable apoptosis, regardless of genotype (data not shown). Thus, the Abi2 null lens phenotype cannot be attributed to aberrant differentiation, proliferation, or apoptosis of lens cells; rather, the data suggest it may be due to defective cell adhesion and/or migration. It is also possible that the thickening of the lens capsule in the Abi2 null lens may contribute to the abnormal packing of secondary lens fiber cells and to the rupture of the posterior region observed at P1.
Localization of Abi2 to adherens junctions in the lens and cultured epithelial cells.
To gain a better understanding of the secondary lens fiber migration defects observed in Abi2 null mice, we examined the expression and localization of Abi2 in the eye. Abi2 is highly expressed in the eye, particularly in the lens (Fig. 4). In contrast, Abi1 protein was not detected in the lens (data not shown). The localization of Abi2 in wild-type P1 lenses was analyzed by cell fractionation and compared with that of a membrane protein (MIP26) and a cytosolic protein (
-crystallin) (39). Abi2 was largely insoluble in hypotonic buffer or a buffer used to extract noncytoskeletal proteins but was soluble in RIPA buffer, which releases proteins associated with the membrane-cytoskeletal fraction, such as MIP26 (Fig. 4A). Immunostaining of wild-type lenses with anti-Abi2 antibody showed high levels of Abi2 at the tips of migrating secondary fibers, particularly at the transition zone, where newly differentiating fibers begin their migration along the epithelial cell-fiber interface (EFI) (Fig. 4B1). Control preimmune sera did not stain wild-type or Abi2 null lenses (data not shown), and the Abi2 null lens did not stain with anti-Abi2 antibody (Fig. 4B2). Abi2 was prominently observed at the cell-cell borders of secondary lens fibers in the anterior of the lens (Fig. 4B1 and C1) and at the base of newly differentiating secondary lens fibers and anterior epithelial cells (Fig. 4B3).
|
-catenin (64). Abi2 colocalized with or was adjacent to the adherens junction protein ß-catenin, along secondary lens fiber cell-cell borders (Fig. 4C1 and C2), and at the tips of secondary lens fibers at the EFI (Fig. 4C1 and C4). Abi2 was detected in a double row of puncta at the interface of secondary lens fibers and anterior epithelial cells at the EFI (Fig. 4C2 and C3). The tips of secondary fibers migrate rapidly at the EFI (2), suggesting that dynamic regulation of adherens junctions must occur at this site. Dynamic regulation of adherens junctions involves de novo actin polymerization (69). Thus, we examined the localization of the Arp2/3 actin nucleator complex in the lens. The p34 Arc component of the Arp2/3 complex localized to the EFI in the lens (Fig. 4C5), which is consistent with dynamic regulation of the actin cytoskeleton at this site. Hence, Abi2 localizes to adherens junctions at the EFI, where proteins involved in actin nucleation also accumulate.
|
Abi proteins modulate adherens junction formation in vitro.
To determine whether Abi proteins play a role in the formation of intercellular adhesions in cultured epithelial cells, Abi1 and Abi2 protein expression was downregulated by use of RNA interference in HeLa cells, as both proteins are expressed in these cells. Abi1 and Abi2 were markedly downregulated in HeLa epithelial cells transfected with siRNAs specific for Abi1 and Abi2 (Fig. 6A). Scrambled siRNA controls did not affect Abi protein expression (Fig. 6A) or localization to adherens junctions (Fig. 6B). Abi2 protein failed to accumulate at adherens junctions in cells transfected with Abi siRNAs (Fig. 6B). Significantly, downregulation of Abi1 and Abi2 expression impaired the formation of adherens junctions as assessed by immunostaining with a ß-catenin-specific antibody (Fig. 6B). While cells transfected with scrambled siRNA controls displayed a strong and continuous pattern of ß-catenin staining at sites of cell-cell adhesion at 2 days posttransfection, loss of Abi protein at these sites in the Abi1/Abi2 siRNA-treated cells resulted in the appearance of finger-like extensions between the adjacent cells, which is characteristic of immature cell-cell junctions (Fig. 6B). Over time, continuous ß-catenin was also observed in the cells with downregulated Abi protein expression, supporting a role for Abi proteins during early adherens junction formation (data not shown). The effects on early adherens junction formation observed in cells transfected with the Abi-specific siRNAs were not due to decreased expression of
-catenin or ß-catenin, but rather correlated with a marked downregulation of WAVE (Fig. 6C), in agreement with previous findings on the positive role of Abi proteins in the regulation of WAVE protein stability (12, 26, 31, 50). Thus, these data reveal a transient requirement for Abi proteins during formation of nascent adherens junctions in vitro.
|
|
|
Defective dendritic spine morphology and density in the absence of Abi2. Abi2 localized to axons and dendrites of wild-type (Fig. 9A1 and B) but not Abi2 null (Fig. 9A2) neurons. Abi2 colocalized with the synaptic markers synaptophysin and synapsin in cortical neurons from E17.5 embryos (data not shown). To determine whether Abi2 was present in dendritic spines, we employed cultured hippocampal neurons from early postnatal wild-type and Abi2 null mice and examined Abi2 localization at different stages of spine development (24, 33). Abi2 staining was strong in dendritic spines of both 14-day in vitro (DIV) (Fig. 9A1 and B1) and 21 DIV (Fig. 9B2) neurons, but it was weak in filopodia, which are precursors to dendritic spines (data not shown). In some cases, Abi2 staining was intense in the central portion of the spine (Fig. 9A1 and B1), whereas in other spines, Abi2 immunofluorescence staining appeared as doublets that sometimes were directly apposed by axonal Abi2 staining (Fig. 9B).
|
Impaired learning and memory in Abi2-deficient mice. The synaptic localization of Abi2, in particular its localization to dendritic spines, and the dendritic spine defects in the Abi2 null mice suggested that memory formation may be impaired in the absence of Abi2. To address this possibility, behavioral tests were performed with wild-type, Abi2+/ and Abi2/ mice. Deficits in short- and long-term memory have been characterized with a one-trial passive avoidance test (70). In this assay, foot shock is used to train mice to refrain from crossing from a lighted to a darkened chamber. Latency to cross to the darkened chamber after conditioning is used as an index of memory consolidation and retention. Initial neurophysiological tests of Abi2/ mice showed that rudimentary sensory and motor functions were within the normal range of mouse behaviors. Abi2/ mice have eyes that are smaller than wild-type mice. To determine whether rudimentary visual responses were intact in Abi2-deficient mice, animals were evaluated for pupillary responses, their ability to track a moving object, and light-dark discrimination. In all three tests, no differences were discerned for wild-type, Abi2/, and Abi2+/ mice; all animals displayed pupillary responses to light, could track a moving object, and could discriminate light from dark (data not shown). In the latter test, all animals rapidly entered a darkened chamber and stayed in this chamber for approximately 2 min. Thereafter, the numbers of transitions between the light and dark chambers and the time spent in each chamber were virtually identical for the three genotypes (data not shown). Hence, adult Abi2 null and heterozygous mice did not have detectable impairment of gross visual functions for orientation, object tracking, visual placement, and dark-light discrimination (data not shown). No differences were discerned in the abilities of the three genotypes of mice to sense and respond to foot shock (Fig. 10A). During passive avoidance training, wild-type, Abi2+/, and Abi2/ mice were equally likely to cross rapidly to the darkened chamber (Fig. 10B). However, when tested at 0.5, 1, or 24 h later, wild-type mice showed substantially longer latencies to cross to the darkened chamber relative to Abi2+/ and Abi2/ mice (Fig. 10B). These data show that Abi2+/ and Abi2/ mice are deficient in short- and long-term memory formation. To investigate whether additional exposure to the task would improve the performance of Abi2-deficient mice, animals that were initially tested at the 1-h retention were retrained and retested 7 days later (final test). During retraining, approximately 86% of each genotype readily crossed to the darkened chamber (Fig. 10C). Retesting showed that although wild-type animals showed the longest latency to cross to the darkened chamber, the latency was not significantly greater than that of Abi2+/ mice (Fig. 10C). Indeed, comparisons between initial and final testing revealed that while retraining did not significantly improve wild-type performance, latencies for Abi2+/ mice were significantly increased (Fig. 10B and C). Although latency scores for Abi2/ mice were not significantly different at retesting compared to initial testing, there was a trend towards increased latency (Fig. 10B and C).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Development of cadherin-dependent epithelial cell-cell adhesion is driven by lamellipodia in living cells (14). Here we showed that Abi2 is enriched at adherens junctions and that as adherens junctions mature, Abi2 accumulation diminishes at these sites. This pattern of localization is similar to that of Rac (14). Thus, Abi2 may function in concert with Rac during intercellular junction formation rather than maintenance. A role for Abi proteins in the formation of adherens junctions is further supported by our finding that downregulation of endogenous Abi proteins by RNA interference impairs early adherens junction formation. The effect of Abi downregulation on adherens junction formation in HeLa epithelial cells is transient, which suggests that other proteins that accumulate at these structures may play redundant roles. Indeed, inhibition of adherens junctions in vitro has been reported to occur as a consequence of functional disruption of a subset of signaling molecules implicated in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, such as the Vasp/Ena protein family, the Rho GTPases, Dia1, and formin1 (18, 29, 51, 69). These reports underscore the importance of adhesion-mediated changes in the actin cytoskeleton for the formation and integrity of adherens junctions.
How does Abi2 regulate lamellipodia-driven adherens junction formation? Lamellipodial protrusions are dependent on Rac activation (16), and Abi proteins have been linked to signaling complexes upstream and downstream of Rac. Abi proteins may stimulate the activity of specific GEF proteins towards Rac, as reported previously (25, 56, 57). Alternatively, Abi proteins may be involved in targeting Rac-GEFs to specific membrane sites to initiate signaling cascades leading to induction of de novo actin polymerization. Abi family proteins may also affect lamellipodial protrusions by regulating WAVE function downstream of Rac. Similar to Abi, WAVE proteins accumulate at the tips of protruding lamellipodia (22, 65). WAVE stimulates the actin nucleating activity of the Arp2/3 complex in response to Rac activation, and loss of WAVE function impairs lamellipodia formation in Drosophila and mouse cells (13, 31, 50, 65). Recently, downregulation of Drosophila Abi and mammalian Abi1 in vitro in cells was shown to inhibit formation of lamellipodia, possibly due to increased degradation and/or mislocalization of WAVE (26, 31, 50). Consistent with these findings, we showed that downregulation of Abi protein expression by RNA interference leads to reduced WAVE levels. Interestingly, we have identified naturally occurring forms of Abi2 that lack N-terminal sequences required for WAVE binding and localization to the tips of lamellipodia (unpublished results). This finding suggests that regulated expression of Abi2 proteins encoding or lacking these N-terminal sequences could affect actin polymerization at the leading edge during development or under pathological conditions. Moreover, abnormal lens morphogenesis and defective cell migration in vivo in mice lacking Abi2 are consistent with the findings that C. elegans orthologs of Nap1/Nap125 and PIR121, two protein components of the Rac-responsive WAVE/Abi complex, regulate tissue morphogenesis and cell migration in vivo (61) and that WAVE2 regulates migration, sprouting, and branching of endothelial cells during mouse development (76).
Abnormalities in the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton may also underlie the neuronal abnormalities present in Abi2-deficient mice. These mice exhibited highly penetrant and profound impairments in short- and long-term memory. These deficits were accompanied by abnormalities in dendritic spine morphology and density in Abi2 null and Abi2 heterozygous mice. Changes in spine morphology and number have been correlated with alterations in behavior and may provide a morphological basis for synaptic plasticity (33, 79). Dendritic spine morphology is developmentally regulated, progressing from filopodial in early development to mushroom-shaped spines with an expanded head connected to the dendrite shaft by a narrow neck in the mature brain (24). Dendritic spines may exhibit additional shapes, such as stubby spines that lack the neck and thin (headless) spines (24). We showed that basal dendrites of layer III pyramidal neurons of Abi2-deficient mice exhibited a significant decrease in the relative proportion of mushroom-shaped spines and a corresponding increase in the proportion of stubby spines. The functional consequences of this morphological change are unclear, but shortening of the spine neck may change synaptic strength (66). Moreover, spine density on apical dendritic branches of layer V pyramidal cells and in the CA1 region of the hippocampus was significantly reduced in Abi2-deficient mice compared to wild-type mice. Abi2 was expressed in both axons and dendritic spines. Therefore, the reduced spine density in the Abi2-deficient mice might be due to loss of presynaptic and/or postsynaptic Abi2 functions.
Abnormalities in dendritic spine morphology and density similar to those presented by the Abi2-deficient mice have been observed in vitro after expression of dominant-negative Rac or dominant-negative PIX, a GEF for Rac (41, 80). Expression of dominant-negative Rac in hippocampal slice cultures produces a decrease in spine density, with some dendrites lacking spines altogether (41). Expression of dominant-negative forms of PIX or the PIX-binding protein GIT1 results in a significant decrease in the number of normal mushroom-shaped spines in cultured hippocampal neurons (80). These findings underscore the critical requirement for Rac signaling in the regulation of dendritic spine morphogenesis and synapse formation. We propose that the absence of Abi2 results in defects in Rac-dependent pathways involved in the regulation of actin dynamics, producing deficits in spine morphology and density.
Alterations in dendritic spine morphology may also result by interfering with the function of cell surface receptors that control intercellular adhesion such as N-cadherin and the Eph receptor tyrosine kinases. Interfering with the function of these receptors results in the replacement of normal mushroom-shaped dendritic spines with long thin spines, filopodia, or immature small-headed or headless spines (15, 23, 40, 68). Our finding that endogenous Abi2 localizes to cadherin-dependent adherens junctions suggests that Abi2 may function downstream of cadherins during synapse formation. This possibility is further supported by recent reports showing that ß-catenin and
-N-catenin regulate dendritic spine morphogenesis in vitro (1, 78). Abi1 has also been linked to ephrin-B1, a membrane-bound ligand for the EphB2 receptor tyrosine kinase. Abi1 binds to Grb4/Nckß, an adaptor protein that interacts with the tyrosine-phosphorylated intracellular tail of ephrin-B1 (9). Ephrins are both pre- and postsynaptic (6, 21), and ephrin-B proteins are highly expressed in postsynaptic CA1 hippocampal neurons and are required for synaptic plasticity (21). It is possible that the absence of Abi2 at sites of interneural adhesion elicits altered synaptic connectivity downstream of several adhesion receptor systems, possibly by blocking the signaling pathways that link the activation of the adhesion receptors to Rac-dependent regulation of actin dynamics at dendritic spines.
It is significant that several genes encoding regulators and effectors of the Rho family GTPases are mutated in patients with syndromic and nonsyndromic forms of mental retardation (46). Among regulators and effectors of Rho GTPases, LIMK1, oligophrenin, and
PIX all have been shown to regulate dendritic spine morphogenesis (20, 35, 80). Furthermore, mice that are homozygous null for WAVE1 exhibit deficits in learning and memory, despite the absence of obvious abnormalities in the cellular organization of the hippocampus (60). These findings suggest functional links between Abi2 and WAVE1 in the regulation of cognitive functions and are consistent with the presence of Abi2 in a protein complex with WAVE1, Nap1, and PIR121/Sra-1 (13, 26, 59, 62). In this regard, the PIR121/Sra-1 proteins bind to the fragile X mental retardation protein FMRP (52), and the fly ortholog of Sra-1 regulates axonal pathfinding and synaptic morphology and interacts biochemically and genetically with the Drosophila orthologs of Rac and FMR1 (53). Interestingly, WAVE1 binds to the c-Abl tyrosine kinase (74), and c-Abl binds and phosphorylates Abi2 (10). Thus, it is possible that WAVE1 and Abi2 function in a coordinated manner to integrate Rac- and Abl kinase-dependent signaling pathways at neuronal synapses (37, 41, 46). As dendritic spine plasticity has been linked to memory formation (79), an exciting possibility is that the memory defects in Abi2-deficient mice may be due to the aberrant regulation of pathways that link neuronal connectivity mediated by adhesion receptors to Rac-dependent actin reorganization.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
crystallin antibodies and Matthew Welch for the anti-p34 Arc antibody. We thank Guoping Feng, Michael Ehlers, Anthony-Samuel La Mantia, Vasanth Rao, Joseph Costello, and Gordon Klintworth for insightful suggestions and Anthony Means and Tso-Pang Yao for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants R01 CA70940 and GM62375 to A.M.P. and R01 HD35170 and NS26620 to P.F.M., by grant 12-FY99-468 from the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, and by a grant from the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression to W.C.W.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bassnett, S., H. Missey, and I. Vucemilo. 1999. Molecular architecture of the lens fiber cell basal membrane complex. J. Cell Sci. 112:2155-2165.[Abstract]
3. Biesova, Z., C. Piccoli, and W. T. Wong. 1997. Isolation and characterization of e3B1, an eps8 binding protein that regulates cell growth. Oncogene 14:233-241.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Blagg, S. L., M. Stewart, C. Sambles, and R. H. Insall. 2003. PIR121 regulates pseudopod dynamics and SCAR activity in Dictyostelium. Curr. Biol. 13:1480-1487.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Chelly, J., and J. L. Mandel. 2001. Monogenic causes of X-linked mental retardation. Nat. Rev. Genetics 2:669-680.[Medline]
6. Contractor, A., C. Rogers, C. Maron, M. Henkemeyer, G. T. Swanson, and S. F. Heinemann. 2002. trans-synaptic Eph receptor-Ephrin signaling in hippocampal mossy fiber LTP. Science 296:1864-1869.
7. Cort,s, F., D. Dagget, R. J. Bryson-Richardson, C. Neyt, J. Maule, P. Gautier, G. E. Hollway, D. Keenan, and P. Currie. 2003. Cadherin-mediated differential cell adhesion controls slow muscle cell migration in the developing zebrafish myotome. Dev. Cell 5:865-876.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Courtney, K. D., M. Grove, H. Vandongen, A. Vandongen, A. S. LaMantia, and A. M. Pendergast. 2000. Localization and phosphorylation of Abl-interactor proteins, Abi-1 and Abi-2, in the developing nervous system. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 16:244-257.