Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2004, p. 1341-1350, Vol. 24, No. 3
0270-7306/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.3.1341-1350.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Yardena Samuels,1,
Boquan Jin,2 Sai Duraisingham,1 Tim Crook,1 and Xin Lu1*
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Imperial College School of Medicine, St. Mary's Campus, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom,1 Department of Immunology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xian 710032, People's Republic of China2
Received 6 June 2003/ Returned for modification 31 July 2003/ Accepted 6 November 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
p53 is a member of a family of three proteins: p53, p63, and p73. p63 and p73 have more than 60% amino acid identity within the DNA binding region of p53 (12, 13, 22). DNA binding specificity among p53 family members is very similar but not identical. As a result, a large number of p53 target genes are also transactivated by p63 and p73. Hence, p63 and p73 share some p53 functions, such as cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, there are many other structural and functional differences between p53, p63, and p73. For example, mutations in p63 and p73 are rare in human cancer. Studies of p53-, p63-, and p73-deficient mice established that the expression of p63 and p73 is more important for mouse development than the expression of p53 and that the loss of p73 or p63 does not predispose mice to cancer (21). Cellular regulators of p53, such as mdm2, do not have the same effects on p63 and p73. While the binding of mdm2 to p53 inhibits the transactivation function of p53 and targets it for degradation (11, 14), it fails to target p63 and p73 for degradation (4, 8). In contrast, the binding of mdm2 to p63 stimulates the transactivation function of p63 by stabilizing the protein (6). Similarly, the CCAAT-binding transcription factor CTF2 binds to the DNA binding region of p53 and p73 but leads to different biological consequences. The binding of CTF2 to p53 enhances the DNA binding activity of p53, but the interaction of CTF2 with p73 inhibits the DNA binding activity of p73 (18). Moreover, unlike p53, p63 and p73 also do not interact with viral proteins, such as the large T antigen of simian virus 40, through their DNA binding domain (7, 8, 15). All these results suggested that an activator or inhibitor of p53 would not necessarily have similar physiological implications for family members p63 and p73. This may explain why no universal activator or inhibitor of the p53 family members has been identified so far.
We recently showed that the apoptotic function of p53 is significantly enhanced by two members of the ASPP family, ASPP1 and ASPP2 (16). Binding to the DNA binding domains of p53, ASPP1, and ASPP2 specifically stimulates the transactivation function of p53 on promoters of proapoptotic genes, such as Bax and PIG3, but not on promoters of p21WAF-1/CIP1 or mdm2. Since the DNA binding domain of p53 is the most homologous region among all p53 family members, we investigated whether ASPP1 and ASPP2 can also interact with the rest of the p53 family members, p63 and p73. The effects of ASPP1 and ASPP2 on the transactivation and apoptotic function of p63 and p73 were also studied.
|
|
|---|
was tagged with the hemagglutinin epitope. p63
was detected with the 4A4 mouse monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz), and p73
was detected with ER-15 (Neomarker).
Transactivation assays.
Saos-2 cells (5 x 105) were plated 24 h prior to transfection in 6-cm-diameter dishes. All transactivation assays contained 1 µg of reporter plasmid. Fifty nanograms of p53, 35 ng of p63
, 25 ng of p73
, and 4 µg of ASPP1 or ASPP2 expression plasmids were used as indicated. Cells were lysed in reporter lysis buffer 16 to 24 h after transfection and assayed using the luciferase assay kit (Promega, Madison, Wis.). The factor of activation of a particular reporter was determined by the activity of the transfected plasmid divided by the activity of vector alone.
Flow cytometry.
Cells (106) were plated 24 to 48 h prior to transfection in 10-cm-diameter plates. All cells were transfected with 2 µg of a plasmid expressing CD20 as a transfection marker. The cells in Fig. 1A and B were transfected with increasing amounts of ASPP1 and ASPP2 (7.5, 15, and 25 µg). The cells in Fig. 6 were transfected with 1 µg of human p53, 1 or 2.5 µg of p63
or p73
, or 10 µg of ASPP1 and ASPP2 plasmid as indicated in the figure. The cells in Fig. 7 were cotransfected with 25 µg of ASPP1 or ASPP2 or 3 µg of p63 or p73 and with 10 µg of pSuper plasmids containing p63, p73, or p53 RNA interference (RNAi) as indicated in the figure. Thirty-six hours after the transfection, both attached and floating cells were harvested and analyzed as described (16).
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. ASPP1 and ASPP2 induce apoptosis independently of p53 in Saos-2 (A) and H1299 (B) cells. In response to treatment with cisplatin (3.5 µg/ml for 16 h), the number of apoptotic cells induced by the expression of ASPP1 and ASPP2 was increased further (C and D). The transfected cells were gated based on the expression of CD20 (16). The percentage of apoptotic cells was measured by the accumulation of cells with a sub-G1 DNA content. The bar graphs show the percentage of apoptotic cells 36 h after transfection and were derived from at least two independent experiments. (E) Expression levels of endogenous p63 , p73 , ASPP1, and ASPP2 in response to cisplatin treatment (+) in Saos-2 and H1299 cells. IVT, in vitro translation.
|
![]() View larger version (67K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis showing that expression of ASPP1 and ASPP2 stimulate the apoptotic function of p53, p63 , and p73 . The transfected cells were gated and analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. The percentage of apoptotic cells 36 h after transfection is shown. The values were derived from two independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (58K): [in a new window] |
FIG.7. Saos-2 and H1299 cells were transfected with plasmid expressing a cell surface marker CD20 together with p53, p63 , or p73 in the presence or absence of ASPP1, ASPP2, p63 RNAi, p73 RNAi, or p53 RNAi as indicated (A, C, and D). The ability of p63 and p73 RNAi to inhibit the expression of p63 and p73 is shown in panel B. The vector used to express RNAi of p63, p73, or p53 is pSuper, and cisplatin treatment was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. The bar graph represents the percentage of apoptotic cells 36 h after transfection and was derived from two independent experiments. cmv, cytomegalovirus; IVT, in vitro translation.
|
In vitro translation and in vitro immunoprecipitation.
p53, p63
, and p73
were in vitro translated and labeled with [35S]methionine, and ASPP1-V5 and ASPP2-V5 were in vitro translated with cold methionine (all translations done with the TNT T7 Quick coupled transcription-translation system (Promega). The lysates containing indicated proteins were incubated at 30°C for 1 h. The anti-V5 antibody immobilized on protein G-agarose beads was added to the binding reaction mixtures and incubated on a rotating wheel at 4°C for 16 h. The beads were then washed with phosphate-buffered saline. The bound proteins were released in SDS gel sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Results were visualized by autoradiography. ASPP1-V5 and ASPP2-V5 were detected by Western blotting with anti-V5 antibodies.
Construction of short interfering RNA of p63 and p73. Oligonucleotides (19 bp) derived from p63 and p73 were ligated into pSuper expression plasmids as described previously (5). The plasmids containing correct 19-bp oligonucleotides of p63 and p73 were confirmed by sequencing. The sequences of p63 and p73 sense and antisense oligonucleotides used in this study are as follows (lowercase indicates the vector sequence from pSuper; uppercase indicates the target sequence for the RNAi): for p63, 5'gatccccTGAATTCCTCAGTCCAGAGGttcaagagaCCTCTGGACTGAGGAATTCAtttttggaaa (sense) and 5'agcttttccaaaaaTGAATTCCTCAGTCCAGAGGtctcttgaaCCTCTGGACTGAGGAATTCAggg (antisense); for p73, 5'gatccccGCCGGGGGAATAATGAGGTttcaagagaACCTCATTATTCCCCCGGCttttggaaa3' (sense) and 5'agcttttccaaaaaGCCGGGGGAATAATGAGGTtctcttgaaACCTCATTATTCCCCCGGCggg3' (antisense).
Northern blots. ASPP1 and ASPP2 expression plasmids or vector-only control pcDNA3 plasmids were introduced into subconfluent Saos-2 cells using Lipofectamine, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Gibco/Invitrogen). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were harvested for RNA isolation using RNAzol B. For Northern blot analysis, total RNA (15 µg) was resolved on 1.4% agarose-formaldehyde gels, transferred to nylon, and probed with a 32P-labeled PUMA or PIG3 cDNA. Equal loading was confirmed by stripping and reprobing the blots with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA.
|
|
|---|
ASPP1 and ASPP2 interact with p63 and p73.
ASPP1 and ASPP2 interact with the DNA binding domain of p53 and stimulate its apoptotic function (16). As the most homologous region among all p53 family members is their DNA binding domain, ASPP could also interact with p63 and p73 and influence their apoptotic function. Consistent with this, five of nine p53 residues reported to bind the C terminus of ASPP2, 53BP2 (10) are present in p63 and p73 (Fig. 2A), suggesting that ASPP1 and ASPP2 may interact with p63 and p73. Saos-2 and H1299 cells express the p53 family members p63 and p73, both of which are known to induce apoptosis. Thus, at least part of the proapoptotic property of ASPP1 and ASPP2 seen in Saos-2 and H1299 cells could be mediated by p63 and p73. This hypothesis was first tested using in vitro-translated ASPP1, ASPP2, and p53 family members p63 and p73. We chose the transcriptionally active isoforms of p63 and p73, p63
and p73
, to represent the family members. As shown in Fig. 2B, p53, p63
, or p73
were coimmunoprecipitated by antibodies specific to ASPP1 or ASPP2, suggesting that ASPP interacts with p63
or p73
in vitro (Fig. 2B and C). However, less p73
was in complex with ASPP1 and ASPP2 than that seen with p53 and p63
. The background band seen in Fig. 2B and C could be caused by the presence of ASPP in reticulocyte lysate.
![]() View larger version (72K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. ASPP1 and ASPP2 interact with p63 and p73 in vitro and in vivo. (A) Sequence comparison of the DNA binding domains (DBDs) of p53, p63, and p73 reveals that the majority of the residues involved in ASPP binding are conserved. p53, p63, and p73 sequences were obtained from GenBank and aligned using CLUSTAL W. The ASPP contact residues of human p53 (Hp53) are indicated with numbered arrows as follows: 1, H178; 2, H179; 3, R181; 4, S183; 5, S241; 6, M243; 7, N247; 8, R248; and 9, R273. ASPP1 and ASPP2 interact with p53 and its family members in vitro (B and C). p53, p63 , and p73 were in vitro translated and labeled with [35S]methionine. V5-tagged ASPP1 and ASPP2 proteins were in vitro translated with cold methionine and immunoprecipitated with anti-V5 antibody. The immunoprecipitates were fractionated on SDS-10% polyacrylamide gels. The presence of radiolabeled p53, p63 , or p73 complexed with ASPP1 or ASPP2 was detected by autoradiography, and the amount of ASPP1 and ASPP2 immunoprecipitated was detected using anti-V5 antibody by Western blotting.
|
and p73
was further studied in vivo in H1299 and Saos-2 cells. Endogenous ASPP1 and ASPP2 were immunoprecipitated by antibodies specific to ASPP1 or ASPP2 (Fig. 3). Consistent with our in vitro observation, the anti-ASPP1 (Fig. 3A and B) and anti-ASPP2 (Fig. 3C and D) antibodies were able to coimmunoprecipitate endogenous p63
and p73
in both H1299 and Saos-2 cells. Under the same conditions, the control antibody Gal4 failed to coimmunoprecipitate p63
or p73
. All these results suggested that ASPP1 and ASPP2 can interact with p63 and p73 in vitro and in vivo.
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. ASPP1 and ASPP2 interact with p63 and p73 in vivo. Samples (2 mg) of H1299 or Saos-2 cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti-ASPP1 ASPP1.88 and anti-ASPP2 BP77 antibodies, respectively. The immunoprecipitates were separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the presence of p63 and p73 on the immunoblots was detected by mouse anti-p63 4A4 and anti-p73 ER-15 monoclonal antibodies, respectively. The presence of ASPP1 or ASPP2 was detected with mouse monoclonal antibody LX011 or DX5410, respectively. In vitro-translated (IVT) p63 and p73 lysates were used as positive controls for the detection of antibody. IP, immunoprecipitation; Ab, antibody.
|
, or p73
. As shown in Fig. 4, the expression of ASPP1 and ASPP2 clearly enhanced the ability of p63 to transactivate the promoters of Bax (data not shown) and PIG3 (Fig. 4A and B). However, under the same conditions, the ability of ASPP1 and ASPP2 to enhance the transactivation function of p73 is much less profound. To compare the degree of activation of different p53 family members by ASPP1 and ASPP2, we divided the luciferase counts derived from each p53 family member plus ASPP by that of the p53 family member alone. This calculation showed that the ability of ASPP1 and ASPP2 to stimulate the transactivation function of p53 is greater than that seen with p63
and p73
(Fig. 4C). Expression of ASPP1 stimulated the transactivation function of p53 by ca. sevenfold, and it stimulated the transactivation function of p63
and p73
by five- and threefold, respectively, on both Bax and PIG3 promoters. Coexpression of ASPP2 with p53 enhanced the transactivation function of p53 on the promoters of Bax and PIG3 20- and 10-fold. On the Bax promoter, however, the expression of ASPP2 enhanced the transcriptional activity of p63g and p73
by only seven- and sixfold, respectively. The ability of ASPP2 to enhance the transactivation function of p63 and p73 on the PIG3 promoter is less pronounced than that seen on BAX promoter. Coexpression of ASPP1 and ASPP2 failed to stimulate the transactivation function of p53, p63
, and p73
on the promoters of mdm2 and p21WAF-1/CIP1 (Fig. 4C). This is consistent with our previous observation that ASPP1 and ASPP2 specifically stimulate the transactivation function of p53 on the promoters of Bax and PIG3 but not mdm2 and p21WAF-1/CIP1 (16).
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG.4. ASPP1 and ASPP2 can specifically stimulate the transactivation function of p53 family members on the promoters of proapoptotic genes, such as Bax, PIG3, and PUMA but not mdm2 and p21WAF-1/CIP1. (A and B) The bar graphs show the effects of ASPP1 and ASPP2 on the transactivation (TA) function of p53, p63 , or p73 on the PIG3 promoter. luc, luciferase. (C) The fold increase in p53, p63 , or p73 transactivation activity by either ASPP1 or ASPP2 on five luciferase (luc) reporters of p53 target genes, Bax, PIG3, PUMA, mdm2, and p21WAF-1/CIP1, is shown. The fold increase was calculated as follows: (activity of p53 family members plus ASPP)/(activity of p53 family members alone). The expression levels of various transfected proteins, ASPP1 (V5 tagged), ASPP2, p53, p63, and p73, were detected using 40 µg of the respective lysates using antibodies V5, DX.5410, DO1, 4A4, and ER-15, respectively. The results were derived from at least three independent experiments.
|
ASPP1 and ASPP2 induce the expression of endogenous PIG3 and PUMA. The ability of ASPP1 and ASPP2 to induce expression of endogenous target genes of p53 family members, such as PIG3 or PUMA, was investigated in Saos-2 cells. As shown in Fig. 5A, expression of ASPP1 or ASPP2 induced expression of endogenous PIG3 and PUMA mRNA. Increased expression of ASPP1 and ASPP2 also enhanced expression of PIG3 protein in both Saos-2 and H1299 cells (Fig. 5B). Under the same conditions, the expression of other p53 target genes, mdm2 and p21WAF-1/CIP1, was not changed. All these observations demonstrated that ASPP1 and ASPP2 could specifically enhance expression of apoptosis-related p53 target genes, such as PUMA and PIG3, independently of p53. This property of ASPP1 and ASPP2 is likely to be mediated by p63 and p73, as ASPP1 and ASPP2 interact with and stimulate the transcriptional activities of p63 and p73.
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Increasing amounts of ASPP1 and ASPP2 induce the expression of two endogenous p53 target genes, PIG3 and PUMA, at both RNA (A) and protein (B) levels in Saos-2 and 1299 cells independently of p53. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
|
and p73
. Increasing amounts of p63
and p73
were transfected into Saos-2 cells to induce apoptosis to an extent similar to that seen with p53. Coexpression of ASPP1 and ASPP2 clearly enhanced the apoptotic function of p63
and p73
(Fig. 6). Interestingly, the extent of increase in the apoptotic function of p63
and p73
is lower than that seen with p53. This is in agreement with the results shown in Fig. 4, where ASPP1 and ASPP2 tend to stimulate the transactivation function of p53 better than p63
and p73
on the promoters of Bax and PIG3 genes.
The p53-independent apoptotic function of ASPP1 and ASPP2 is mediated by p63 and p73.
Being activators of p63 and p73, perhaps the p53-independent apoptotic function of ASPP1 and ASPP2 is mediated by p63 and p73. This hypothesis was tested using an RNA interference approach to inhibit the activity of endogenous p63 and p73 in Saos2 and H1299 cells. The effectiveness and specificity of p63 and p73 RNAi were first tested. As shown in Fig. 7A, coexpression of p63 and p73 RNAi specifically inhibited the apoptosis induced by p63
or p73
, respectively, in both Saos-2 and H1299 cells. Under the same conditions, p53 RNAi did not have any effects on the apoptotic function of p63 and p73. The ability of p63 and p73 RNAi to reduce the protein expression of p63 and p73 is also evident (Fig. 7B). Cotransfection of p63 or p73 RNAi to reduce the expression of endogenous p63 or p73 significantly reduced the apoptotic function of ASPP1 and ASPP2 in both Saos-2 and H1299 cells, demonstrating that in the absence of p53, ASPP1 and ASPP2 induce apoptosis via endogenous p63 and p73 (Fig. 7C). When p63 and p73 RNAi were coexpressed together, almost 80% of the apoptotic function of ASPP1 and ASPP2 was inhibited. Finally, the ability of ASPP1 and ASPP2 to enhance the apoptotic function of p63 and p73 in response to DNA damage is also evident, since the expression of RNAi of p63 or p73 but not p53 significantly reduced the number of apoptotic cells (Fig. 7D). These findings illustrated that ASPP1 and ASPP2 are common activators of all p53 family members and that most of the p53-independent apoptotic function of ASPP1 and ASPP2 is mediated by p63 and p73.
|
|
|---|
Nevertheless, the ability of ASPP1 and ASPP2 to increase these functions of p53 family members is not identical. The ability of ASPP1 and ASPP2 to stimulate the transactivation and apoptotic functions of p53 is slightly higher than that seen on p63
and p73
. Interestingly, however, while ASPP1 and ASPP2 have very little effect on the transactivation function of p73 on the promoters of Bax and PIG3, they both had the most impact stimulating the transactivation function of p73 on the PUMA promoter (Fig. 4C). Moreover, under the same conditions, ASPP1 and ASPP2 hardly enhanced the transactivation function of p53. This suggested that p53 and p73 might not use an identical set of target genes to induce apoptosis. This observation is particularly important, since very little is known about the specific targets of p63 and p73 that are critical in inducing apoptosis. Perhaps cellular regulators of p53 family members, such as ASPP1 and ASPP2, play an important role in determining the selectivity of individual p53 family members in controlling the expression of their target genes in vivo.
Although we do not yet know the molecular mechanism of how ASPP1 and ASPP2 control the promoter specificity of individual p53 family members, it is clear that ASPP1 and ASPP2 can stimulate the apoptotic function of all members of the p53 family. This is extremely important, as in the absence of p53, ASPP1 and ASPP2 could act as activators of p63 and p73 to induce apoptosis. Hence, the expression of ASPP1 and ASPP2 could suppress tumor growth and confer cellular sensitivity to cancer treatments, even in tumors expressing mutant p53. The results also provide a molecular explanation for why reduced expression of ASPP1 and ASPP2 was observed in 23% of human breast tumors containing mutant p53, although down-regulation of ASPP1 and ASPP2 was seen in 60% of human breast tumors expressing wild-type p53 (16). Deciphering the interactions of the various p53 family members with ASPP family members is certain to offer important insights into tumorigenesis and cancer treatments.
The work was mainly supported by the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research. D.B. was supported by a grant from the Association of International Cancer Research.
D.B. and Y.S. contributed equally to this study. ![]()
|
|
|---|
and their collaboration to induce apoptosis. Nature 399:809-813.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»