Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, April 2004, p. 2968-2977, Vol. 24, No. 7
0270-7306/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.7.2968-2977.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Program in Immunology and Virology,1 Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology,2 Department of Cell Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655,4 Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 452213
Received 4 September 2003/ Returned for modification 7 October 2003/ Accepted 2 January 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stressors known to activate p53 include hypoxia, DNA damage, and the expression of cellular or viral oncoproteins (24, 69, 85). In response to these cellular stressors, p53 is covalently modified, including phosphorylation at numerous N- and C-terminal serine residues and acetylation on C-terminal lysine residues (4). Several cellular kinases that play critical roles in the activation of p53 following DNA damage have been identified. These kinases include Atm, the kinase mutated in ataxia telangiectasia (AT), Atr, the Atm- and Rad3-related kinase, and their downstream kinase substrates, checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) and checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) (1, 78). The role of Atr in regulating the p53 response to DNA damage is not well understood due to the early embryonic lethality of atr-/- mouse embryos (12, 20). However, it has been proposed that Atr is activated in response to certain types of DNA damage and can phosphorylate p53 on serine 15 (14, 26, 45, 48). Atr is also able to phosphorylate and activate Chk1 (25, 30, 64), which can subsequently phosphorylate the N terminus of p53 (77).
The role of Atm in activating p53 following DNA damage is better understood. In response to gamma-irradiation or genotoxic drugs that induce DNA double-strand breaks, Atm is activated and can directly phosphorylate p53 at serine 15 (44). In cells from AT patients, there is a delay in activation of p53 following gamma-irradiation (79). In addition to directly phosphorylating p53, Atm can phosphorylate and activate the human checkpoint kinase Chk2 (11, 16, 55-57). Chk2 is able to further phosphorylate p53 at additional N-terminal serine residues, including serine 15 and serine 20, causing increased p53 stability and transcriptional activation (17, 33, 77). The importance of Chk2 in this pathway has been demonstrated in dominant negative Chk2-expressing cells (17) and Chk2-deficient mice, which exhibit a defect in apoptosis and a decrease in p53 stabilization in response to gamma-irradiation (82).
While the pathways resulting in p53 activation following DNA damage are beginning to become clear, the pathways leading to p53 activation and apoptosis following cellular or viral oncogene expression remain somewhat elusive. Expression of cellular or viral oncoproteins that promote proliferation, such as c-myc or adenovirus E1A, results in p53-dependent apoptosis (18, 31) and, in the case of c-myc expression, appears to be largely dependent on E2F1 (49). E2F1 is a member of the E2F family of transcription factors that modulate expression of many genes involved in the transition from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle (63). Ectopic expression of E2F1 induces p53-dependent apoptosis in both tissue culture (47, 70, 88) and mouse models (54, 66, 68). Like that of E2F1, expression of the E2F family members E2F2 or E2F3 will also induce quiescent cells to enter S phase, but unlike E2F1 expression, E2F2 and E2F3 expression does not induce apoptosis in fibroblasts (19, 41, 46).
E2F1 signaling to p53 was thought to be through the p19ARF/Mdm2 pathway. p19ARF encodes a protein that modulates the activity of Mdm2, an E3-like ubiquitin ligase that regulates p53 stability by promoting its degradation via the proteasome (22, 23, 28, 35). It has been hypothesized that E2F1 activates p53 by transactivation of p19ARF, thereby alleviating MDM2-promoted degradation of p53 (8, 37, 43, 72) and subsequently committing a cell to apoptosis (61, 67). However, E2F1 has been shown to induce p53-dependent apoptosis in mouse models and in mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) that lack p19ARF (73, 74, 83, 84). Additionally, E2F1 has been shown to induce covalent modification of p53 in the presence or absence of p19ARF (73, 74), and these modifications are associated with E2F1-mediated apoptosis (73).
Having found that E2F1 can induce p53-dependent apoptosis in the absence of p19ARF, we wanted to determine the pathway(s) by which E2F1 activates p53 to induce cell death. Here we define a pathway in which deregulation of E2F1 either by ectopic expression of E2F1 or inactivation of retinoblastoma protein (Rb) family members by human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) E7 signals apoptosis by inducing the expression of Chk2. Additionally, E2F1- and E7-induced apoptosis are compromised in cells from patients with the related disorders AT and Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS), diseases involving the lack of functional Atm and Nbs1 gene products, respectively. This loss of apoptosis is coincident with a decrease in the ability of E2F1 and E7 to promote p53 phosphorylation. E2F2, an E2F family member that induces S phase but not apoptosis, also activates Atm, resulting in phosphorylation of p53. However, we find that the key commitment step in apoptosis induction is the ability of E2F1, and not E2F2, to induce Chk2 expression.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adenoviral vectors. Recombinant adenoviral vectors encoding E2F1 and E2F2 have been described previously (19, 47, 75). The Chk1, DN-Chk1, Chk2, DN-Chk2, and HPV-16 E7 recombinant adenoviruses were created by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli (29). DN-Chk1 contains an aspartic acid-to-alanine substitution at position 330. Plasmids encoding Chk2 and DN-Chk2 constructs were generously provided by David Johnson (M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Smithville, Tex.). DN-Chk2 contains a serine-to-alanine substitution at position 347. A plasmid encoding HPV-16 E7 was generously provided by Karl Munger (Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.). Control viruses encode either an empty expression cassette or green fluorescent protein (GFP). Infection with control virus had no effect on the parameters tested relative to mock infection (data not shown). Viruses were propagated in 293 cells and purified by centrifugation through cesium-chloride gradients (73) and titered as described previously (15). All viruses were infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1,000 unless otherwise noted. The viral inoculum was then removed and replaced with Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium containing the appropriate serum concentrations and cultured under the conditions described previously (73).
Analysis of apoptosis. Cells were plated in 10-cm-diameter dishes at 6,000 cells per cm2 or in 24-well plates at 104 cells per well. Virus infections were performed 24 h after plating. At 96 h postinfection, cells were centrifuged at 500 x g for 10 min at 4°C and lysed, and the cell death detection ELISAplus assay was performed as described by the manufacturer (Roche).
Western blot analysis. Whole-cell extracts were harvested from recombinant adenovirus-infected cells at 24 h postinfection (hpi). Cells were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in whole-cell extract buffer (50 mM HEPES, 2 mM magnesium chloride, 250 mM sodium chloride, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1x mammalian protease inhibitor cocktail [Sigma], 1x phosphatase inhibitor cocktails I and II [Sigma]) by incubation for 30 min on ice followed by sonication. Soluble proteins were separated by centrifugation at 13,000 x g in a microcentrifuge, and supernatants were stored at -70°C. Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Perkin-Elmer) by electroblotting. E2F1 was detected using monoclonal antibody KH-95 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and E2F2 was detected using polyclonal antiserum C-20 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). p53 protein was detected using monoclonal antibody D0-1 (Oncogene Research Products), and the phospho-serine 15 and -serine 20 forms of p53, the phospho-threonine 68 form of Chk2, and the phospho-serine 345 form of Chk1 were detected using polyclonal antisera specific for each modification (Cell Signaling Technologies). Chk1 was detected using polyclonal antiserum FL-476 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and Chk2 was detected using polyclonal antiserum H-300 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or monoclonal antibody clone no. 7 (Lab Vision Corp.). Atm was detected using polyclonal antiserum Ab-3 (Oncogene Research Products), and the phospho-serine 1981 form of Atm was detected using polyclonal antiserum (Rockland). Actin was detected using polyclonal antiserum I-19 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Immunoreactive proteins were detected with a chemiluminescence kit (Perkin-Elmer) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Actin blots are shown in the figures as protein loading controls. Relative changes in the levels of p53 were estimated from scanned images of Western blots by using Multianalyst software (Bio-Rad).
Northern blot analysis. Poly(A) RNA was isolated from cells by using a Micro-FastTrack mRNA isolation kit as described by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Total cellular RNA was isolated using Trizol as described by the manufacturer (Invitrogen). Biotinylated Chk2, Atm, and GAPDH probes were generated by PCR using primers Chk2F (5'-ATGTCTCGGGAGTCGGATGTTG-3'), Chk2R (5'-GCACCACTTCCAAGAGTTTTTGAC-3'), ATMAF (5'-ACGATGCCTTACGGAAGTTGC-3'), ATMAR (5'-GGACAGAGAAGCCAATACTGGACTG-3'), GAPDHF (5'-CAAGGTCATCCATGACAAC-3'), and GAPDHR (5'-TGGTCGTTGAGGGCAATG-3') as described by the manufacturer (KPL). Hybridized probes were visualized with a chemiluminescence kit as described by the manufacturer (KPL). Blots were sequentially probed and stripped.
RNA interference. The small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) used in this study were generated by Xeragon, Germantown, Md. siRNA oligonucleotides were transfected into cells at a concentration of 100 nM by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) as described by the manufacturer. All experiments shown were done using siE2F1c, siChk2b, siE2F2a, or siE2F3a. Similar results (data not shown) were obtained using the other siRNAs described below. Control siRNAs (siCon) recognize either GFP or retrovirus long terminal repeat and had no effect on the parameters tested relative to mock transfection: siGFP (5'-CGUAAACGGCCACAAGUUC-3'), siLTR (5'-GAUCCAGCAUAUAAGCAGC-3'), siE2F1a (5'-GGCCCGAUCGAUGUUUUCC-3'), siE2F1b (5'-CUGACCAUCAGUACCUGGC-3'), siE2F1c (5'-GUCACGCUAUGAGACCUCA-3'), siChk2a (5'-CUCCAGCCAGUCCUCUCAC-3'), siChk2b (5'-GAACCUGAGGACCAAGAAC-3'), siE2F2a (5'-GUGCAUCAGAGUGGAUGGC-3'), siE2F2b (5'-CAAGAGGCUGGCCUAUGTG-3'), siE2F3a (5'-AGCGGUCAUCAGUACCUCU-3'), siE2F3b (5'-CUGUUAACCGAGGAUUCAG-3').
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In addition to directly phosphorylating p53 on serine 15 (6, 14), Atm also activates other kinases that lead to p53 phosphorylation on serine 20 (17, 33, 56, 77, 89). Since downstream kinase activation by Atm can require Nbs1 (13, 51, 90), we investigated whether functional Nbs1 protein was necessary for E2F1-induced apoptosis. We found that E2F1-induced apoptosis was compromised in fibroblasts from NBS patients, similar to the reduction observed in AT cells (Fig. 1A). Although expression of E2F1 was found to be slightly less in AT cells than in normal cells (Fig. 1E), increased amounts of E2F1 still did not induce apoptosis in AT cells (data not shown). Although E2F1 was able to induce total p53 protein levels in NBS cells (Fig. 1C), we observed a modest decrease in the levels of the phospho-serine 15 form and a large decrease in the levels of the phospho-serine 20 form of p53 in NBS cells following E2F1 expression (Fig. 1D), demonstrating that functional Nbs1 protein is required for E2F1-mediated apoptosis and for signaling of p53 phosphorylation at the serine 20 residue. Ectopic E2F2 expression, found to be similar in all three cell types (Fig. 1F), failed to induce apoptosis in NBS cells (Fig. 1A) but did cause an increase in both total p53 levels and the levels of the phospho-serine 15 form of p53 (Fig. 1C and D). These results are consistent with a mechanism whereby E2F2 alters the phospho-serine 15 form of p53 in NBS cells through its ability to activate Atm.
Chk2 is required for E2F1-mediated apoptosis. Given that phosphorylation of p53 on serine 20 correlates with apoptosis, we proceeded to use this as a marker to identify any additional kinase(s) that may contribute to E2F1-mediated apoptosis. Among the Atm-induced kinases that require functional Nbs1 protein for activation and that directly phosphorylate p53 on serine 20 is the human checkpoint kinase Chk2 (13, 51, 77). To examine the role of Chk2 in E2F1-induced apoptosis, we coexpressed E2F1 with a kinase-defective form of Chk2 (DN-Chk2) to inhibit Chk2 kinase activity in fibroblasts. We observed a reduction in apoptosis when E2F1 was coexpressed with DN-Chk2. Apoptosis levels did not appreciably change with a dominant negative form of Chk1 (DN-Chk1) (Fig. 2A), another DNA damage-responsive kinase that is capable of phosphorylating p53 on serine 20 (77). Expression of DN-Chk1 or DN-Chk2 alone did not alter levels of E2F1 protein (data not shown). To confirm the involvement of Chk2 in E2F1-mediated apoptosis, we used siRNAs to reduce the levels of Chk2 in cells (Fig. 2B). We observed a reduction in apoptosis following E2F1 expression in cells transfected with siChk2b (Fig. 2C) and no effect of this siRNA following expression of E2F2 (Fig. 2C). Similar results were obtained using siChk2a (data not shown).
|
E2F1 specifically induces Chk2 expression. We have shown that E2F1 requires Atm, Nbs1, and Chk2 to efficiently induce apoptosis. However, E2F2 is also able to activate Atm, resulting in phosphorylation of p53 at serine 15, but it does so without inducing apoptosis. We confirmed the activation state of Atm by using an antibody that recognizes a modified form of Atm observed following DNA damage that correlates with Atm activation (5). Expression of either E2F1 or E2F2 led to an increase in the levels of the phospho-serine 1981 form of Atm, while leaving the total Atm protein levels unchanged (Fig. 3B). The difference between E2F1 signaling and E2F2 signaling appears to be the ability of E2F1 to stimulate Chk2 activity, which results in an increase in the phospho-serine 20 form of p53 and correlates with E2F1-induced apoptosis. Because Atm activation is upstream of Chk2 in signaling to p53, E2F1 expression must have an additional effect(s) downstream or independent of Atm that is specific to E2F1 for apoptosis induction. We found that expression of E2F1, but not E2F2, led to an increase in the levels of Chk2 protein, and this increase occurred in the absence of Atm or functional Nbs1 (Fig. 3A). E2F1 expression also results in accumulation of the phospho-threonine 68 form of Chk2 (data not shown), a modification observed following DNA damage that may be associated with Chk2 activation (56, 57). The phospho-threonine 68 modification of Chk2 may not be a reliable marker of Chk2 activation (3, 76, 87). Instead, we examined the Chk2 substrate p53 serine 20 residue as a marker for Chk2 activation. While expression of E2F1 resulted in an increase in Chk2 protein levels in the absence of functional Atm or Nbs1 (Fig. 3A), we did not observe an increase in the phospho-serine 20 form of p53 in these cells (Fig. 1D). Induction and activation of Chk2 by E2F1 appeared to be specific because E2F1 expression did not result in an increase in Chk1 protein (Fig. 3A) or in an increase in the phospho-serine 345 form of Chk1 (data not shown). Chk2 protein accumulation appeared to result from an increase in Chk2 mRNA levels following E2F1 expression (Fig. 3C). E2F2 expression did not lead to an increase in Chk2 protein levels (Fig. 3A) or Chk2 mRNA (Fig. 3C). Since neither E2F1 nor E2F2 induced the expression of Atm mRNA (Fig. 3D), induction of Chk2 expression appears to be specific to E2F1 and correlates with the induction of apoptosis.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The finding that Atm and Nbs1 are required for apoptosis associated with deregulated E2F1 is similar to the requirement for p53 activation following DNA damage from gamma-irradiation and certain genotoxic agents (9). How Atm is activated following expression of E2F1, E2F2, or HPV-16 E7 remains unclear. We speculate that expression of E2F proteins or E7 results in chromatin changes associated with induction of S phase or activation of DNA damage response proteins. In the case of HPV-16 E7, activation of Atm may be a result of chromosomal structural changes and DNA breaks that occur following E7 expression (21). However, since activation of Atm by E2F1 results in apoptosis, we cannot rule out the possibility that the different E2F family members activate Atm by distinct mechanisms.
Activation of Atm can result in phosphorylation of Chk2 at threonine 68 (11, 16, 55-57), and this Chk2 modification requires functional Nbs1 (13, 51, 90). However, the phospho-threonine 68 modification of Chk2 may not be a reliable marker of Chk2 activation due to the complexity of Chk2 regulation and the importance of individual phosphorylation events on Chk2 activation status (3, 76, 87). Instead, we examined phosphorylation of the serine 20 residue on p53 as a reliable marker for Chk2 activation. While we observed an increase in total p53 levels in normal, AT, and NBS cells, only in normal cells did we observe an increase in the phospho-serine 20 form of p53, a substrate for active Chk2 kinase. Inhibition of Chk2 activity by a dominant negative construct or by siRNA targeting resulted in a failure to phosphorylate the serine 20 residue following expression of either E2F1 or E7, demonstrating the specificity of this modification by Chk2.
Interestingly, Atm was found not to be required for apoptosis resulting from Rb inactivation in murine brain choroid plexus epithelium (50). While it is not apparent why this apoptosis is Atm independent in the choroid plexus epithelium, p53-dependent apoptosis that is Atm independent has been described in certain cell types (7, 32). Alternatively, these observations suggest that there may be a species-specific bias for Atm in the E2F1-mediated apoptosis pathway. Indeed, the reduction in apoptosis observed in atm-/- MEFs is not as dramatic as that seen in human dermal fibroblasts following E2F1 expression. We speculate that in the murine system other signaling pathways such as Atr/Chk1 may compensate for the loss of Atm, whereas a more stringent requirement for Atm in human dermal fibroblasts is observed. Therefore, there may be both cell-type and species-specific requirements for Atm in apoptosis induction, and it is possible that other Atm-related kinases may compensate for the loss of Atm function in some cells.
Although we have defined a pathway linking deregulated E2F1 activity to p53 and apoptosis, integration of E2F1 signaling and activation of the Atm/Chk2/p53 pathway also offer a mechanism for the proposed involvement of E2F1 in apoptosis resulting from DNA damage. Following treatment of cells with DNA-damaging agents, E2F1 protein accumulates (10, 34, 36, 52, 58, 65) and is phosphorylated at an N-terminal Atm recognition sequence that is unique to E2F1 among the E2F family members (52). This phosphorylation of E2F1 is largely dependent on Atm and is required for efficient E2F1 stabilization following DNA damage (52). Chk2 has also been shown to phosphorylate and stabilize E2F1 following DNA damage, and this modification has been shown to be required for E2F1-dependent apoptosis following DNA damage by altering its promoter specificity (81). Additionally, DNA damage-induced apoptosis is compromised in thymocytes from E2F1-/- mice (52), suggesting that E2F1 has multiple roles in DNA damage signaling. We speculate that activation of E2F1 by DNA damage leads to increased p14ARF expression, resulting in increased pools of p53 protein. E2F1 is also able to activate Atm kinase activity and induce Chk2 expression, leading to increased p53 activation and E2F1 activity. E2F1 activation following DNA damage would therefore act to amplify DNA damage signals converging at p53 to result in apoptosis.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants CA86038 (T.F.K.) and CA77735 (S.J.). H.A.R. was supported by an NIH training grant (5T32 AI07349).
The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Agarwal, M. L., W. R. Taylor, M. V. Chernov, O. B. Chernova, and G. R. Stark. 1998. The p53 network. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1-4.
3. Ahn, J., and C. Prives. 2002. Checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2) monomers or dimers phosphorylate Cdc25C after DNA damage regardless of threonine 68 phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 277:48418-48426.
4. Appella, E., and C. W. Anderson. 2001. Post-translational modifications and activation of p53 by genotoxic stresses. Eur. J. Biochem. 268:2764-2772.[Medline]
5. Bakkenist, C. J., and M. B. Kastan. 2003. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 421:499-506.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Banin, S., L. Moyal, S. Shieh, Y. Taya, C. W. Anderson, L. Chessa, N. I. Smorodinsky, C. Prives, Y. Reiss, Y. Shiloh, and Y. Ziv. 1998. Enhanced phosphorylation of p53 by ATM in response to DNA damage. Science 281:1674-1677.
7. Barlow, C., K. D. Brown, C. X. Deng, D. A. Tagle, and A. Wynshaw-Boris. 1997. Atm selectively regulates distinct p53-dependent cell-cycle checkpoint and apoptotic pathways. Nat. Genet. 17:453-456.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Bates, S., A. C. Phillips, P. A. Clark, F. Stott, G. Peters, R. L. Ludwig, and K. H. Vousden. 1998. p14ARF links the tumour suppressors RB and p53. Nature 395:124-125.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Bernstein, C., H. Bernstein, C. M. Payne, and H. Garewal. 2002. DNA repair/pro-apoptotic dual-role proteins in five major DNA repair pathways: fail-safe protection against carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res. 511:145-178.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Blattner, C., A. Sparks, and D. Lane. 1999. Transcription factor E2F-1 is upregulated in response to DNA damage in a manner analogous to that of p53. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:3704-3713.
11. Brown, A. L., C. H. Lee, J. K. Schwarz, N. Mitiku, H. Piwnica-Worms, and J. H. Chung. 1999. A human Cds1-related kinase that functions downstream of ATM protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:3745-3750.
12. Brown, E. J., and D. Baltimore. 2000. ATR disruption leads to chromosomal fragmentation and early embryonic lethality. Genes Dev. 14:397-402.
13. Buscemi, G., C. Savio, L. Zannini, F. Micciche, D. Masnada, M. Nakanishi, H. Tauchi, K. Komatsu, S. Mizutani, K. Khanna, P. Chen, P. Concannon, L. Chessa, and D. Delia. 2001. Chk2 activation dependence on Nbs1 after DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:5214-5222.
14. Canman, C. E., D. S. Lim, K. A. Cimprich, Y. Taya, K. Tamai, K. Sakaguchi, E. Appella, M. B. Kastan, and J. D. Siliciano. 1998. Activation of the ATM kinase by ionizing radiation and phosphorylation of p53. Science 281:1677-1679.
15. Castillo, J. P., A. D. Yurochko, and T. F. Kowalik. 2000. Role of human cytomegalovirus immediate-early proteins in cell growth control. J. Virol. 74:8028-8037.
16. Chaturvedi, P., W. K. Eng, Y. Zhu, M. R. Mattern, R. Mishra, M. R. Hurle, X. Zhang, R. S. Annan, Q. Lu, L. F. Faucette, G. F. Scott, X. Li, S. A. Carr, R. K. Johnson, J. D. Winkler, and B. B. Zhou. 1999. Mammalian Chk2 is a downstream effector of the ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Oncogene 18:4047-4054.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Chehab, N. H., A. Malikzay, M. Appel, and T. D. Halazonetis. 2000. Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53. Genes Dev. 14:278-288.
18. Debbas, M., and E. White. 1993. Wild-type p53 mediates apoptosis by E1A, which is inhibited by E1B. Genes Dev. 7:546-554.
19. DeGregori, J., G. Leone, A. Miron, L. Jakoi, and J. R. Nevins. 1997. Distinct roles for E2F proteins in cell growth control and apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7245-7250.
20. de Klein, A., M. Muijtjens, R. van Os, Y. Verhoeven, B. Smit, A. M. Carr, A. R. Lehmann, and J. H. Hoeijmakers. 2000. Targeted disruption of the cell-cycle checkpoint gene ATR leads to early embryonic lethality in mice. Curr. Biol. 10:479-482.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Duensing, S., and K. Munger. 2002. The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins independently induce numerical and structural chromosome instability. Cancer Res. 62:7075-7082.
22. Freedman, D. A., and A. J. Levine. 1998. Nuclear export is required for degradation of endogenous p53 by MDM2 and human papillomavirus E6. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:7288-7293.
23. Fuchs, S. Y., V. Adler, T. Buschmann, X. Wu, and Z. Ronai. 1998. Mdm2 association with p53 targets its ubiquitination. Oncogene 17:2543-2547.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Giaccia, A. J., and M. B. Kastan. 1998. The complexity of p53 modulation: emerging patterns from divergent signals. Genes Dev. 12:2973-2983.
25. Guo, Z., A. Kumagai, S. X. Wang, and W. G. Dunphy. 2000. Requirement for Atr in phosphorylation of Chk1 and cell cycle regulation in response to DNA replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Dev. 14:2745-2756.
26. Hall-Jackson, C. A., D. A. Cross, N. Morrice, and C. Smythe. 1999. ATR is a caffeine-sensitive, DNA-activated protein kinase with a substrate specificity distinct from DNA-PK. Oncogene 18:6707-6713.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Harbour, J. W., and D. C. Dean. 2000. The Rb/E2F pathway: expanding roles and emerging paradigms. Genes Dev. 14:2393-2409.
28. Haupt, Y., R. Maya, A. Kazaz, and M. Oren. 1997. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 387:296-299.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. He, T. C., S. Zhou, L. T. da Costa, J. Yu, K. W. Kinzler, and B. Vogelstein. 1998. A simplified system for generating recombinant adenoviruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:2509-2514.
30. Hekmat-Nejad, M., Z. You, M. C. Yee, J. W. Newport, and K. A. Cimprich. 2000. Xenopus ATR is a replication-dependent chromatin-binding protein required for the DNA replication checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 10:1565-1573.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Hermeking, H., and D. Eick. 1994. Mediation of c-Myc-induced apoptosis by p53. Science 265:2091-2093.
32. Herzog, K. H., M. J. Chong, M. Kapsetaki, J. I. Morgan, and P. J. McKinnon. 1998. Requirement for Atm in ionizing radiation-induced cell death in the developing central nervous system. Science 280:1089-1091.
33. Hirao, A., Y. Y. Kong, S. Matsuoka, A. Wakeham, J. Ruland, H. Yoshida, D. Liu, S. J. Elledge, and T. W. Mak. 2000. DNA damage-induced activation of p53 by the checkpoint kinase Chk2. Science 287:1824-1827.
34. Hofferer, M., C. Wirbelauer, B. Humar, and W. Krek. 1999. Increased levels of E2F-1-dependent DNA binding activity after UV- or gamma-irradiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:491-495.
35. Honda, R., H. Tanaka, and H. Yasuda. 1997. Oncoprotein MDM2 is a ubiquitin ligase E3 for tumor suppressor p53. FEBS Lett. 420:25-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Huang, Y., T. Ishiko, S. Nakada, T. Utsugisawa, T. Kato, and Z. M. Yuan. 1997. Role for E2F in DNA damage-induced entry of cells into S phase. Cancer Res. 57:3640-3643.
37. Inoue, K., M. F. Roussel, and C. J. Sherr. 1999. Induction of ARF tumor suppressor gene expression and cell cycle arrest by transcription factor DMP1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:3993-3998.
38. Ishida, S., E. Huang, H. Zuzan, R. Spang, G. Leone, M. West, and J. R. Nevins. 2001. Role for E2F in control of both DNA replication and mitotic functions as revealed from DNA microarray analysis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:4684-4699.
39. Jack, M. T., R. A. Woo, A. Hirao, A. Cheung, T. W. Mak, and P. W. Lee. 2002. Chk2 is dispensable for p53-mediated G1 arrest but is required for a latent p53-mediated apoptotic response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:9825-9829.
40. Jin, S., and A. J. Levine. 2001. The p53 functional circuit. J. Cell Sci. 114:4139-4140.
41. Johnson, D. G., J. K. Schwarz, W. D. Cress, and J. R. Nevins. 1993. Expression of transcription factor E2F1 induces quiescent cells to enter S phase. Nature 365:349-352.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Kalma, Y., L. Marash, Y. Lamed, and D. Ginsberg. 2001. Expression analysis using DNA microarrays demonstrates that E2F-1 up-regulates expression of DNA replication genes including replication protein A2. Oncogene 20:1379-1387.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Kamijo, T., F. Zindy, M. F. Roussel, D. E. Quelle, J. R. Downing, R. A. Ashmun, G. Grosveld, and C. J. Sherr. 1997. Tumor suppression at the mouse INK4a locus mediated by the alternative reading frame product p19ARF. Cell 91:649-659.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Kastan, M. B., and D. S. Lim. 2000. The many substrates and functions of ATM. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1:179-186.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Kim, S. T., D. S. Lim, C. E. Canman, and M. B. Kastan. 1999. Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J. Biol. Chem. 274:37538-37543.
46. Kowalik, T. F., J. DeGregori, G. Leone, L. Jakoi, and J. R. Nevins. 1998. E2F1-specific induction of apoptosis and p53 accumulation, which is blocked by Mdm2. Cell Growth Differ. 9:113-118.[Abstract]
47. Kowalik, T. F., J. DeGregori, J. K. Schwarz, and J. R. Nevins. 1995. E2F1 overexpression in quiescent fibroblasts leads to induction of cellular DNA synthesis and apoptosis. J. Virol. 69:2491-2500.[Abstract]
48. Lakin, N. D., B. C. Hann, and S. P. Jackson. 1999. The ataxia-telangiectasia related protein ATR mediates DNA-dependent phosphorylation of p53. Oncogene 18:3989-3995.[CrossRef][Medline]
49. Leone, G., R. Sears, E. Huang, R. Rempel, F. Nuckolls, C. H. Park, P. Giangrande, L. Wu, H. I. Saavedra, S. J. Field, M. A. Thompson, H. Yang, Y. Fujiwara, M. E. Greenberg, S. Orkin, C. Smith, and J. R. Nevins. 2001. Myc requires distinct E2F activities to induce S phase and apoptosis. Mol. Cell 8:105-113.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Liao, M. J., C. Yin, C. Barlow, A. Wynshaw-Boris, and T. van Dyke. 1999. Atm is dispensable for p53 apoptosis and tumor suppression triggered by cell cycle dysfunction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:3095-3102.
51. Lim, D. S., S. T. Kim, B. Xu, R. S. Maser, J. Lin, J. H. Petrini, and M. B. Kastan. 2000. ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Nature 404:613-617.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. Lin, W. C., F. T. Lin, and J. R. Nevins. 2001. Selective induction of E2F1 in response to DNA damage, mediated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation. Genes Dev. 15:1833-1844.
53. Ma, Y., R. Croxton, R. L. Moorer, Jr., and W. D. Cress. 2002. Identification of novel E2F1-regulated genes by microarray. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 399:212-224.[CrossRef][Medline]
54. Macleod, K. F., Y. Hu, and T. Jacks. 1996. Loss of Rb activates both p53-dependent and independent cell death pathways in the developing mouse nervous system. EMBO J. 15:6178-6188.[Medline]
55. Matsuoka, S., M. Huang, and S. J. Elledge. 1998. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 282:1893-1897.
56. Matsuoka, S., G. Rotman, A. Ogawa, Y. Shiloh, K. Tamai, and S. J. Elledge. 2000. Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10389-10394.
57. Melchionna, R., X. B. Chen, A. Blasina, and C. H. McGowan. 2000. Threonine 68 is required for radiation-induced phosphorylation and activation of Cds1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:762-765.[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Meng, R. D., P. Phillips, and W. S. El-Deiry. 1999. p53-independent increase in E2F-1 expression enhances the cytotoxic effects of etoposide and of adriamycin. Int. J. Oncol. 14:5-14.[Medline]
59. Morris, J. D., T. Crook, L. R. Bandara, R. Davies, N. B. LaThangue, and K. H. Vousden. 1993. Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 regulates E2F and contributes to mitogenic signalling. Oncogene 8:893-898.[Medline]
60. Muller, H., A. P. Bracken, R. Vernell, M. C. Moroni, F. Christians, E. Grassilli, E. Prosperini, E. Vigo, J. D. Oliner, and K. Helin. 2001. E2Fs regulate the expression of genes involved in differentiation, development, proliferation, and apoptosis. Genes Dev. 15:267-285.
61. Muller, H., and K. Helin. 2000. The E2F transcription factors: key regulators of cell proliferation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1470:M1-M12.[Medline]
62. Nahle, Z., J. Polakoff, R. V. Davuluri, M. E. McCurrach, M. D. Jacobson, M. Narita, M. Q. Zhang, Y. Lazebnik, D. Bar-Sagi, and S. W. Lowe. 2002. Direct coupling of the cell cycle and cell death machinery by E2F. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:859-864.[CrossRef][Medline]
63. Nevins, J. R. 1998. Toward an understanding of the functional complexity of the E2F and retinoblastoma families. Cell Growth Differ. 9:585-593.[Medline]
64. Nghiem, P., P. K. Park, Y. Kim, C. Vaziri, and S. L. Schreiber. 2001. ATR inhibition selectively sensitizes G1 checkpoint-deficient cells to lethal premature chromatin condensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:9092-9097.
65. O'Connor, D. J., and X. Lu. 2000. Stress signals induce transcriptionally inactive E2F-1 independently of p53 and Rb. Oncogene 19:2369-2376.[CrossRef][Medline]
66. Pan, H., C. Yin, N. J. Dyson, E. Harlow, L. Yamasaki, and T. Van Dyke. 1998. Key roles for E2F1 in signaling p53-dependent apoptosis and in cell division within developing tumors. Mol. Cell 2:283-292.[CrossRef][Medline]
67. Phillips, A. C., and K. H. Vousden. 2001. E2F-1 induced apoptosis. Apoptosis 6:173-182.[CrossRef][Medline]
68. Pierce, A. M., I. B. Gimenez-Conti, R. Schneider-Broussard, L. A. Martinez, C. J. Conti, and D. G. Johnson. 1998. Increased E2F1 activity induces skin tumors in mice heterozygous and nullizygous for p53. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:8858-8863.
69. Prives, C. 1998. Signaling to p53: breaking the MDM2-p53 circuit. Cell 95:5-8.[CrossRef][Medline]
70. Qin, X. Q., D. M. Livingston, W. G. Kaelin, Jr., and P. D. Adams. 1994. Deregulated transcription factor E2F-1 expression leads to S-phase entry and p53-mediated apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10918-10922.
71. Ren, B., H. Cam, Y. Takahashi, T. Volkert, J. Terragni, R. A. Young, and B. D. Dynlacht. 2002. E2F integrates cell cycle progression with DNA repair, replication, and G(2)/M checkpoints. Genes Dev. 16:245-256.
72. Robertson, K. D., and P. A. Jones. 1998. The human ARF cell cycle regulatory gene promoter is a CpG island which can be silenced by DNA methylation and down-regulated by wild-type p53. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:6457-6473.
73. Rogoff, H. A., M. T. Pickering, M. E. Debatis, S. Jones, and T. F. Kowalik. 2002. E2F1 induces phosphorylation of p53 that is coincident with p53 accumulation and apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:5308-5318.
74. Russell, J. L., J. T. Powers, R. J. Rounbehler, P. M. Rogers, C. J. Conti, and D. G. Johnson. 2002. ARF differentially modulates apoptosis induced by E2F1 and Myc. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:1360-1368.
75. Schwarz, J. K., C. H. Bassing, I. Kovesdi, M. B. Datto, M. Blazing, S. George, X. F. Wang, and J. R. Nevins. 1995. Expression of the E2F1 transcription factor overcomes type beta transforming growth factor-mediated growth suppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:483-487.
76. Schwarz, J. K., C. M. Lovly, and H. Piwnica-Worms. 2003. Regulation of the Chk2 protein kinase by oligomerization-mediated cis- and trans-phosphorylation. Mol. Cancer Res. 1:598-609.
77. Shieh, S. Y., J. Ahn, K. Tamai, Y. Taya, and C. Prives. 2000. The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2) phosphorylate p53 at multiple DNA damage-inducible sites. Genes Dev. 14:289-300.
78. Shiloh, Y. 2001. ATM and ATR: networking cellular responses to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11:71-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
79. Siliciano, J. D., C. E. Canman, Y. Taya, K. Sakaguchi, E. Appella, and M. B. Kastan. 1997. DNA damage induces phosphorylation of the amino terminus of p53. Genes Dev. 11:3471-3481.
80. Stanelle, J., T. Stiewe, C. C. Theseling, M. Peter, and B. M. Putzer. 2002. Gene expression changes in response to E2F1 activation. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:1859-1867.
81. Stevens, C., L. Smith, and N. B. La Thangue. 2003. Chk2 activates E2F-1 in response to DNA damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:401-409.[CrossRef][Medline]
82. Takai, H., K. Naka, Y. Okada, M. Watanabe, N. Harada, S. Saito, C. W. Anderson, E. Appella, M. Nakanishi, H. Suzuki, K. Nagashima, H. Sawa, K. Ikeda, and N. Motoyama. 2002. Chk2-deficient mice exhibit radioresistance and defective p53-mediated transcription. EMBO J. 21:5195-5205.[CrossRef][Medline]
83. Tolbert, D., X. Lu, C. Yin, M. Tantama, and T. Van Dyke. 2002. p19(ARF) is dispensable for oncogenic stress-induced p53-mediated apoptosis and tumor suppression in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:370-377.
84. Tsai, K. Y., D. MacPherson, D. A. Rubinson, D. Crowley, and T. Jacks. 2002. ARF is not required for apoptosis in Rb mutant mouse embryos. Curr. Biol. 12:159-163.[CrossRef][Medline]
85. Vousden, K. H. 2000. p53: death star. Cell 103:691-694.[CrossRef][Medline]
86. Weinmann, A. S., S. M. Bartley, T. Zhang, M. Q. Zhang, and P. J. Farnham. 2001. Use of chromatin immunoprecipitation to clone novel E2F target promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:6820-6832.
87. Wu, X., and J. Chen. 2003. Autophosphorylation of checkpoint kinase 2 at serine 516 is required for radiation-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 278:36163-36168.
88. Wu, X., and A. J. Levine. 1994. p53 and E2F-1 cooperate to mediate apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3602-3606.
89. Xie, S., H. Wu, Q. Wang, J. P. Cogswell, I. Husain, C. Conn, P. Stambrook, M. Jhanwar-Uniyal, and W. Dai. 2001. Plk3 functionally links DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis at least in part via the p53 pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 276:43305-43312.
90. Zhao, S., Y. C. Weng, S. S. Yuan, Y. T. Lin, H. C. Hsu, S. C. Lin, E. Gerbino, M. H. Song, M. Z. Zdzienicka, R. A. Gatti, J. W. Shay, Y. Ziv, Y. Shiloh, and E. Y. Lee. 2000. Functional link between ataxia-telangiectasia and Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene products. Nature 405:473-477.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles: