Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, June 2005, p. 5146-5157, Vol. 25, No. 12
0270-7306/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.25.12.5146-5157.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
School of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, South Korea
Received 16 September 2004/ Returned for modification 20 October 2004/ Accepted 11 March 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
To maintain lipid homeostasis, adipocytes carry out two reciprocal biochemical processes: lipogenesis and lipolysis. These two processes are tightly controlled by several hormones, lipid metabolites, and nutritional conditions such as feeding and fasting. With these signals, lipogenic transcription factors, including ADD1/SREBP1c, LXRs, and PPAR
actively participate in lipid metabolism in adipocytes. These transcription factors are highly expressed in adipose tissue and play a key role in adipocyte differentiation by coordinating lipogenic and adipocyte-specific gene expression (50). Because lipogenesis is tightly linked with adipogenesis, it is difficult to distinguish the two processeslipogenesis and adipogenesisduring adipocyte differentiation.
Malonyl coenzyme A (malonyl-CoA) and NADPH are considered to be essential elements in lipogenesis (29, 54). Malonyl-CoA, which is produced by acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) carboxylase (ACC), is a major substrate for long-chain fatty acid synthesis. It also suppresses fatty acid oxidation by inhibiting carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT-1) and acts as a signal molecule in appetite regulation (24, 52, 53, 66). Therefore, ACC2-null mice, with defects in malonyl-CoA synthesis, show a higher fatty acid oxidation rate and a significant loss of body fat mass (1, 2). NADPH also contributes to fatty acid synthesis by supplying reducing power. NADPH is produced by several enzymes, including malic enzyme (ME) and the first two enzymes of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) (54). Although isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) also generates NADPH, its major function is irrelevant to lipogenesis (21, 54). Since NADPH is indispensable for the synthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol, it is plausible to speculate that NADPH producing enzymes might be associated with lipid metabolism disorders such as hyperlipidemia and lipid toxicity in metabolic diseases, including obesity and diabetes.
Among the four NADPH-producing enzymes, G6PD is the rate-limiting enzyme of PPP, and it is highly conserved in most mammalian species (33). G6PD plays a key role in the maintenance of redox potential and cell survival via production of NADPH and pentose phosphates (33). Previous researches on G6PD have been mostly focused on erythrocytes since G6PD deficiency in erythrocytes is a common human enzymopathy which results from a mutation in the G6PD gene (8). Other G6PD studies have been directed to cell growth, survival, and redox regulation with nonerythrocyte cells, including fibroblasts, hepatocytes, and neuronal cells (9, 33, 38, 54). G6PD also participates in reductive biosynthesis of fatty acids and cholesterol. Regarding the lipogenic activity of G6PD, it has been demonstrated that hepatic G6PD is regulated by nutritional signals, including high-carbohydrate diet, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and hormonal signals such as insulin, glucagon, thyroid, and glucocorticoids (33, 54). Furthermore, it has been reported that G6PD-deficient patients show a decrease in lipogenic rate and serum lipoprotein concentrations, implying the importance of G6PD in fatty acid synthesis (15, 16). Nonetheless, the functional roles of G6PD in adipocytes are poorly understood.
In the present study, we demonstrated that both G6PD mRNA and protein were highly expressed in adipocytes, and their levels were significantly elevated in fat tissues of several obese mouse models. In adipocytes, G6PD overexpression stimulated the expression of adipocyte marker genes, as well as the elevation of cellular free fatty acid (FFA), and triglyceride (TG) and FFA release into the medium. In addition, expression levels of several adipocytokines, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
), resistin, and adiponectin were sensitively modulated by G6PD, which would then influence insulin sensitivity in adipocytes. To determine more precisely the physiological roles of G6PD, we suppressed G6PD expression via small interfering RNA (siRNA). The resulting G6PD knockdown impaired normal adipocyte differentiation by decreasing both intracellular lipid accumulation and adipocyte marker gene expression. Therefore, these data suggest that G6PD functions to enhance both lipogenesis and adipogenesis and that high levels of G6PD in fat cells would lead to abnormal lipid metabolism and insulin resistance, which are frequently found in obese animals.
|
|
|---|
Northern blot analysis and real-time RT-PCR.
Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen/Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Each RNA was then denatured in formamide and formaldehyde, and separated by electrophoresis on formaldehyde-containing agarose gels. After electrophoresis, RNA was transferred to nylon membrane (Schleicher & Schuell), which was cross-linked with UV and hybridized with DNA probes. DNA probes were labeled by random priming method by using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (Takara) and [
-32P]dCTP (Amersham-Pharmacia). cDNAs used as probes were those for G6PD, 6PGD, ME, IDH, ADD1/SREBP1c, FAS, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
), C/EBP
, aP2, HSL, and 36B4. To normalize RNA loading, blots were hybridized with a cDNA probe for human acidic ribosomal protein, 36B4. For real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analysis, cDNAs were synthesized with SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen). It was analyzed in a model iCycler Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) with following primer sets: G6PD, sense (5'-CGATGGCAGAGCAGGT-3') and antisense (5'-GATCTGGTCCTCACG-3'); FAS, sense (5'-TGCTCCCAGCTGCAGGC-3') and antisense (5'-GCCCGGTAGCTCTGGGTGTA-3'); PPAR
, sense (5'-TTGCTGAACGTGAAGCCCATCGAGG-3') and antisense (5'-GTCCTTGTAGATCTCCTGGAGCAG-3'); aP2, sense (5'-CAAAATGTGTGATGCCTTTGTG-3') and antisense (5'-CTCTTCCTTTGGCTCATGCC-3'); TNF-
, sense (5'-GCCACCACGCTCTTCTGCCT-3') and antisense (5'-CTGATGGTGTGGGTGAGGAG-3'); resistin, sense (5'-CAGAAGGCACAGCAGTCTTG-3') and antisense (5'-GACCGGAGGACATCAGACAT-3'); adiponectin, sense (5'-GGCAGGAAAGGAGAACCTGG-3') and antisense (5'-GCCTTGTCCTTCTTGAAGAG-3'); GAPDH, sense (5'-TGCACCACCAACTGCTTAG-3') and antisense (5'-GGATGCAGGGATGATGTTC-3'); and cyclophilin, sense (5'-CAGACGCCACTGTCGCTTT-3') and antisense (5'-TGTCTTTGGAACTTTGTCTGCAA-3').
Western blot analysis.
White adipose tissues and adipocytes were lysed with TGN buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1% Tween 20, 0.2% NP-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 100 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 µg of aprotinin/ml, 2 µg of pepstatin A/ml, and 10 µg of leupeptin/ml). Total cell lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min for the removal of fat debris. The protein concentration was determined by BCA assay kit (Pierce). Western blot analyses were conducted according to Amersham Life Science's protocol. The proteins were separated by electrophoresis on a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore). After the transfer, the membranes were blocked with nonfat milk containing PBST and were probed with primary antibodies against G6PD, PPAR
, glycogen synthase kinase 3ß (GSK3ß), phospho-GSK3ß, Myc, Flag, adiponectin, IR, IRS-1, Akt, phospho-Akt, and phosphotyrosine (4G10). G6PD antibodies were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. PPAR
, Myc, and Flag antibodies were acquired from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. GSK3ß and phospho-GSK3ß were purchased from Transduction Laboratory. IR, IRS-1, Akt, phospho-Akt and 4G10 antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Lastly, mouse adiponectin antibodies were provided by KOMED (Seoul, Korea). The results were visualized with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Sigma Aldrich) and enhanced chemiluminescence.
G6PD enzyme assay. G6PD enzyme activities were determined by measuring the rate NADPH production. Since 6PGD, the second enzyme of PPP, also produces NADPH, both 6PGD and total dehydrogenase activity (G6PD plus 6PGD) were measured separately as previously described (64). G6PD activity was calculated by subtracting the activity of 6PGD from the total enzyme activity. Glucose-6-phosphate, 6-phosphogluconate, and NADP+ were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Protein levels were determined for each sample by using a BCA assay kit (Pierce), and each enzyme activity was normalized by determining the protein concentration.
Measurement of cellular lipid metabolites. Cell contents of triglycerides and cholesterol in the 3T3-L1 cells were measured by using a TG and cholesterol assay kit (Sigma Aldrich). The amount of free fatty acids was determined with a NEFA assay kit (Roche). Each analysis was performed as recommended by the manufacturer.
Retrovirus infection. Retroviruses were constructed in pBabe vectors by using puromycin selectable markers. Viral constructs were transfected into BOSC cells by using calcium-phosphate transfection method (48). Cells were incubated in DMEM containing 10% FBS for 48 h. The cell culture medium was filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter, and the viral supernatant was used for infection of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes with Polybrene (4 µg/ml). The cells were infected for at least 12 h and allowed to recover for 24 h with fresh medium. The infected cells were selected with puromycin (1 to 5 µg/ml).
Adenovirus infection. G6PD adenovirus was produced by Neurogenex (Seoul, Korea). G6PD cDNA was in frame fused with Flag epitope tag in its N terminus. For adenovirus infection, 3T3-L1 adipocytes (at day 6 after differentiation) were incubated with serum-free DMEM, and various titers of adenovirus for 16 h at 37°C. Then, the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium. Each experiment was performed at 72 h after viral infection.
siRNA for G6PD. The sequences of the oligonucleotides used to create pSUPER-retro-siRNA-G6PD were designed from Oligoengine tools. Three sets of mouse G6PD siRNA oligonucleotides are positioned at ca. 279 to 297, 546 to 564, and 1,149 to 1,167 nucleotides downstream from the transcription start site of mouse G6PD cDNA. Three constructs were referred as pSUPER-retro-siRNA-G6PD-2i (ca. 279 to 297 nucleotides), 5i (ca. 546 to 564 nucleotides), and 11i (ca. 1,149 to 1,167 nucleotides), respectively. The siRNA sequences were as follows: G6PD-2i-sense (5'-GATCCCCGAAAGACCTAAGCTGGAGGTTCAAGAGACCTCCAGCTTAGGTCTTTCTTTTTGGAAA-3'), G6PD-2i-antisense (5'-AGCTTTTCCAAAAAGAAAGACCTAAGCTGGAGGTCTCTTGAACCTCCAGCTTAGGTCTTTCGGG-3'), G6PD-5i-sense (5'-GATCCCCCTGTCGAACCACATCTCCTTTCAAGAGAAGGAGATGTGGTTCGACAGTTTTTGGAAA-3'), G6PD-5i-antisense (5'-AGCTTTTCCAAAAACTGTCGAACCACATCTCCTTCTCTTGAAAGGAGATGTGGTTCGACAGGGG-3'), G6PD-11i-sense (5'-GATCCCCCAGTGCAAGCGTAATGAGCTTCAAGAGAGCTCATTACGCTTGCACTGTTTTTGGAAA-3'), and G6PD-11i-antisense (5'-AGCTTTTCCAAAAACAGTGCAAGCGTAATGAGCTCTCTTGAAGCTCATTACGCTTGCACTGGGG-3'). These oligonucleotides were annealed and then cloned into pSUPER-Retro vector (OligoEngine). The DNA constructs were used to produce G6PD siRNA retrovirus. siRNA experiments were performed as described by the manufacturer's protocols (OligoEngine).
Generation of G6PD enzyme dead mutants. Site-directed mutagenesis of mouse G6PD cDNA was performed by using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene) with the following mutagenic primers (mutated sites were underlined): G6PD-S188F(m2) (5'-CTGTCGAACCACATCTTCTCTCTTTTCCGTGACG-3') and G6PD-K386E(m4) (5'-CTTCCACCAACAGTGCGAGCGTAATGAGCTGGTC-3').
Glucose uptake assay. Insulin stimulated glucose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes was determined by measuring [14C]2-deoxy-glucose uptake as previously described (7). In short, adenovirus-infected 3T3-L1 adipocytes were incubated in low-glucose DMEM containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin for 16 h at 37°C. Cells were stimulated with or without 100 nM insulin for 1 h at 37°C. Glucose uptake was initiated by the addition of [14C]2-deoxy-D-glucose at a final concentration of 3 µmol/liter for 10 min in HEPES buffer saline (140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 20 mM HEPES [pH 7.4]). The reaction was terminated by separating cells from HEPES buffer saline and [14C]2-deoxy-D-glucose. After three washes in ice-cold PBS, the cells were extracted by 0.1% SDS and subjected to scintillation counting for 14C radioactivity. The protein concentration was determined with a BCA assay kit (Pierce), and the radioactivities were normalized by determining each protein concentration.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (50K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Expression of G6PD mRNA in mouse tissues and adipocytes. (A) The indicated tissues were dissected from 10-week-old C57BL/6J mice. Total RNA was isolated, and mRNA levels of indicated genes were analyzed by Northern blot analyses. cDNA probes, including G6PD, 6PGD, ME, IDH, ADD1, PPAR , and aP2, were used. (B) Total RNAs were isolated from 3T3-F442A and 3T3-L1 cells at the indicated time point after differentiation. Total RNA (20 µg) was analyzed for the expression of G6PD, PPAR , and aP2 by Northern blot analyses. Equal loading was confirmed by assaying for 36B4. Pre, preadipocytes; Adi, adipocytes.
|
![]() View larger version (55K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Expression of G6PD mRNA in fat tissues of obese mice models, including db/db, ob/ob and diet-induced obesity (DIO). Subcutaneous or epididymal fat pads were dissected from 16-week-old db/+, db/db, C57BL/6J, ob/ob, and DIO (C57BL/6J mice on a high-fat diet for 9 weeks) mice. Total RNA was isolated, and the mRNA levels of indicated genes were represented by Northern blots. (A) cDNA probes including G6PD, ME, IDH, FAS, PPAR , and aP2 were used, and equal loading was confirmed by assaying for 36B4. Subcutaneous fat, db/+ (lanes 1 to 3) and db/db (lanes 4 to 7); epididymal fat, db/+ (lanes 8 to 10) and db/db (lanes 11 to 14). (B) Relative amounts of each mRNA were quantified by measuring the ratio of each mRNA from db/db versus db/+ mice after normalization with 36B4, respectively. The intensity of each mRNA was determined by using a phosphorimager with Image-Master software (Pharmacia Biomedical Systems). (C) Representative Northern blots show the mRNA levels of G6PD and aP2. B6 stands for C57BL/6J. Equal loading was confirmed by assaying for 36B4.
|
3.3-fold) compared to lean mice (Fig. 3A). As expected from the mRNA and protein levels of G6PD, the enzymatic activity of G6PD was enhanced in various fat depots of db/db mice (Fig. 3B). However, G6PD enzymatic activities of the liver and muscle from db/db mice were insignificantly different from those of lean mice (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, the enzymatic activities of G6PD in fat tissues were at least 5- to 20-fold higher than that of liver in both normal and obese mice. Taken together, these observations suggest that both the expression level and the enzymatic activity of G6PD are remarkably elevated in several fat pads of obese animals, which may link to lipid dysregulation.
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Protein levels and enzymatic activities of G6PD in obese db/db mice tissues. (A) Total cell lysates were extracted from epididymal fat (white adipose tissues [WAT]) pads of db/+ and db/db mice. Immunoblotting was performed with G6PD, GSK3ß, and PPAR antibodies. (B) Subcutaneous (Sub.), mesenteric (Mes.), and epididymal (Epi.) fat pad, liver, and muscle tissues were dissected from db/+ and db/db mice. Tissue lysates were extracted and G6PD enzymatic activities were measured as described in Materials and Methods. The data are presented as mean ± the standard error (db/+ = three, db/db = four). The enzymatic activities were normalized by determining the protein concentrations.
|
1.4-fold of its enzyme activity in comparison to mock retrovirus-infected adipocytes (Fig. 4A). On day 6 after the induction of adipocyte differentiation, G6PD-overexpressed 3T3-L1 cells showed enhanced adipocyte morphology with larger and more lipid droplet accumulation (Fig. 4B). Northern blot analyses were performed to investigate the change in lipogenic and adipogenic gene expression profiles. As shown in Fig. 4C, G6PD overexpression markedly promoted the expression of most adipocyte marker genes, including G6PD, FAS, ADD1/SREBP1c, PPAR
, and aP2. These observations suggest that G6PD overexpression is able to stimulate adipogenesis with lipogenesis by increasing both adipogenic and lipogenic gene expression.
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Overexpression of G6PD stimulates adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were infected with mock (pBabe) or G6PD retrovirus (pBabe-G6PD), which were differentiated into mature adipocytes. (A) Proteins were extracted from pBabe or pBabe-G6PD-transduced 3T3-L1 adipocytes at 6 days after differentiation induction. G6PD and 6PGD enzymatic activities were measured as described in Materials and Methods. The data are presented as means ± standard errors (n = 2); , aP2, and HSL. Endo.G6PD stands for endogenous G6PD mRNA. (D to F) Total cell lysates were collected from pBabe or pBabe-G6PD overexpressed 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Cellular FFAs (D), TGs (E), and FFAs released into culture medium (F) were measured. The data were normalized by using protein concentrations. Each experiment was repeated three times, and data are presented as means ± standard errors (n = 3).
|
1.4-fold (Fig. 4F). In contrast, cellular cholesterol levels were not significantly changed (data not shown). These results indicate that the level of G6PD expression is closely associated with the levels of fatty acid metabolites, including TG and FFAs in adipocytes. This implies that aberrant increase of G6PD in obese subjects might promote circulating plasma FFA level, which is known to be a key cause of metabolic diseases, including insulin resistance and hyperlipidemia and lipotoxicity (3, 12, 13). Knockdown of G6PD impairs adipogenesis. To verify whether G6PD is associated with adipocyte differentiation, we decided to knockdown G6PD by using siRNAs. We designed three different G6PD siRNA constructs into pSUPER retrovector (G6PD-2i, -5i, and -11i [see details in Materials and Methods]). We infected 3T3-L1 cells with these siRNA retroviruses and examined their abilities to suppress G6PD protein levels (Fig. 5A). Among these siRNAs, G6PD-11i most effectively suppressed the expression of endogenous G6PD protein (almost 90% reduction of G6PD protein), whereas G6PD-2i and G6PD-5i partially decreased G6PD protein in 3T3-L1 cells (Fig. 5A). Consistently, G6PD-11i effectively blunted G6PD enzyme activity (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Knockdown of G6PD suppresses lipogenic and adipogenic activities in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Three synthetic siRNAs, which were targeting different regions of G6PD mRNAs (see details in Materials and Methods), were constructed into pSUPER retrovector. Retroviral siRNA constructs were used to infect 3T3-L1 cells, and the cells were differentiated into mature adipocytes. (A) Total cell lysates were collected from each retroviral siRNA-infected 3T3-L1 adipocytes (mock, G6PD-2i, -5i, and -11i). Immunoblotting with G6PD antibody indicates the protein levels of endogenous G6PD. (B) Mock or G6PD-11i siRNA-infected 3T3-L1 cells were induced into adipocytes, which were stained with Oil-Red O. Macroscopic (top) and microscopic (bottom) views of Oil-Red O staining are shown. (C to E) Total cell lysates were extracted from mock or G6PD-11i-infected 3T3-L1 adipocytes at 10 days after differentiation. Cellular TG levels (C), FFA levels (D), and cholesterol levels (E) were measured. The data are presented as means ± standard errors from three experiments. (F) Total RNAs were isolated from each retroviral siRNA (mock, G6PD-2i, -5i, and -11i)-infected cells at 0, 6, and 10 days after differentiation. Northern blot analyses were performed to evaluate mRNA levels of lipogenic (G6PD, 6PGD, ME, ADD1/SREBP1c, and FAS) and adipogenic (PPAR , C/EBP , and aP2) genes. Equal loading was confirmed by assessing levels of 28S rRNA.
|
To determine whether the reduction of G6PD expression might affect adipogenic gene expression in 3T3-L1 cells, we performed Northern blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 5F, the mRNA expression levels of most lipogenic genes including G6PD, 6PGD, ME, ADD1/SREBP1c, and FAS and those of adipogenic genes including PPAR
, C/EBP
, and aP2 were greatly decreased in G6PD-11i-infected 3T3-L1 cells, indicating that a certain amount of G6PD appears to be required for the execution of both adipogenesis and lipogenesis in adipocytes.
Catalytic activity of G6PD is required for adipogenesis. To clarify whether the effect of G6PD on adipogenesis is associated with its catalytic activity or scaffolding activity, we examined the effects of G6PD enzyme activity-deficient mutants on adipogenesis. On the basis of numerous studies from human G6PD mutants (8, 46), we generated two mutants, G6PD-S188F and G6PD-K386E (Fig. 6A). Mouse G6PD-S188F and K386E mutants were named G6PD-m2 and G6PD-m4, respectively. When G6PD-m2 or -m4 proteins were expressed to a similar extent compared with the wild type, the enzyme activities of both G6PD mutants were almost abolished in COS7 cells (Fig. 6B and C). To further investigate whether the catalytic activity of G6PD is required for adipogenesis, 3T3-L1 cells were infected with retroviruses containing G6PD-m2 or -m4 and were induced to differentiate into adipocytes for 6 days. As shown in Fig. 6D, G6PD-WT-overexpressing 3T3-L1 cells enhanced adipogenesis, whereas G6PD-m2- and -m4-overexpressing cells were more or less differentiated into adipocytes than mock-infected cells. In addition, we measured G6PD enzymatic activity from wild-type and mutant G6PD-overexpressing 3T3-L1 adipocytes. As expected, 3T3-L1 cells overexpressing G6PD-m2 and -m4 exhibited lower G6PD activity than wild-type G6PD-overexpressing adipocytes (Fig. 6E). Consistent with these observations, adipogenic and lipogenic gene expression was not enhanced by overexpression of G6PD activity-deficient mutants (Fig. 6F). Therefore, it is likely that G6PD stimulates adipogenesis through its enzymatic activity rather than by functioning as a scaffolding protein.
![]() View larger version (66K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Catalytic activity of G6PD is required for adipogenesis. (A) Schematic representation of mouse G6PD mutants: G6PD-m2 (S188F) and -m4 (K386E) were cloned into pCDNA 3.1()MycHis or pBabe vector. (B and C) After 2 days of transfection, the same amount of COS7 cells were lysed for Western blot and enzyme activity assay. (B) Immunoblotting of G6PD expression in COS7 cells with either vector alone or myc-tagged G6PD constructs (G6PD-WT, -m2, and -m4) with antibody to Myc epitope and G6PD. (C) G6PD enzymatic activities were measured as described in Materials and Methods. The data are presented as means ± standard errors (n = 5). , and aP2 in mock-, G6PD-WT-, -m2-, or -m4-overexpressing 3T3-L1 adipocytes was measured by real-time RT-PCR. Values are normalized to the levels of GAPDH and cyclophilin and are represented as means ± standard errors (n = 3).
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Effects of G6PD overexpression on the expression of adipocytokines, including adiponectin, TNF- , resistin, and FFAs. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were infected with different titers of AdG6PD (0 to 50 PFU/cell) for 16 h. (A) Total cell lysates were isolated from AdG6PD-infected 3T3-L1 adipocytes at 72 h after infection. Protein samples were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunoblotting was performed with antibodies to adiponectin, G6PD, and Flag, which detected only AdG6PD. (B) Released FFAs into culture medium were measured with a NEFA assay kit (Roche). Obtained results were normalized by protein concentrations. The data are presented as means ± standard errors (n = 3). (C) Total RNA was isolated from mock- or AdG6PD-infected adipocytes, and mRNA levels of indicated genes (G6PD, TNF- , resistin, and adiponectin) were determined by real-time RT-PCR. Each mRNA amount was normalized with GAPDH and cyclophilin.
|
and resistin were greatly elevated in G6PD-overexpressed adipocytes (Fig. 7C). Among these adipocytokines, TNF-
and resistin are well known to induce insulin resistance in obese or diabetic animal models, whereas adiponectin enhances insulin sensitivity (41, 42). Therefore, these observations strongly suggest that increase of G6PD levels in adipocytes would alter insulin sensitivity not only by changing lipid metabolites but also by modulating adipocytokine expression.
G6PD overexpression attenuates insulin signaling.
Since overexpression of G6PD in adipocytes increased the levels of FFAs, TNF-
, and resistin, which are key players in insulin resistance (Fig. 7), we hypothesized that G6PD overexpression would induce insulin resistance. To test this hypothesis, we examined the insulin signaling cascade with or without AdG6PD infection. AdMock-infected adipocytes exhibited increased tyrosine phosphorylation of insulin receptor (IR) and IR substrate 1 (IRS-1) and phosphorylation of Akt and GSKß when treated with insulin (Fig. 8A and B). In contrast, these phosphorylation events were significantly diminished in AdG6PD-infected adipocytes (Fig. 8A and B).
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Effect of G6PD overexpression on insulin signaling (A and B) and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (C) in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. 3T3-L1 adipocytes were infected with mock or G6PD adenovirus. At 2 days after infection, cells were starved for 16 h with or without treatment of rosiglitazone (10 µM). (A) The cells were subsequently treated with 100 nM insulin at 37°C for 10 min, and the cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting with anti-IR, anti-IRS1, antiphosphotyrosine (4G10), anti-Akt, anti-pAkt, anti-GSK3ß, or anti-pGSK3ß antibody. (B) Relative fold increases in insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of IR, IRS1, Akt, and GSK3ß. The levels of each phospho-protein were normalized with those of total protein amounts. (C) G6PD overexpression decreased insulin-stimulated [14C]2-deoxy-glucose uptake. AdMock- or AdG6PD-infected 3T3-L1 adipocytes were starved with serum-free DMEM for 12 h. Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake assays were conducted as described in Materials and Methods. The cpm results were normalized with protein concentrations. The fold increases in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake were normalized by using AdMock-infected adipocytes. The results are presented as a percentage of the control (mean ± standard error, n = 2). Rosi, rosiglitazone.
|
, improve insulin sensitivity (20). Thus, we decided to examine whether the strong insulin sensitizer, TZD, is able to rescue insulin resistance in the presence of G6PD overexpressed adipocytes. As shown in Fig. 8, rosiglitazone, a member of TZD, clearly reversed the attenuated insulin sensitivity by G6PD overexpression (Fig. 8A and B). These results suggest that G6PD overexpression diminished insulin signaling, which is probably associated with change of adipocytokine expression, whereas TZD could reverse the insulin resistance induced by G6PD overexpression (Fig. 8A and B). To confirm these results, we conducted insulin stimulated glucose uptake assay because it is a good measure of insulin sensitivity in adipocytes. We determined the ability of AdG6PD-infected 3T3-L1 adipocytes to uptake [14C]2-deoxy-D-glucose in response to insulin. As shown in Fig. 8C, the fold increases in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake were reduced in G6PD-overexpressed adipocytes, and these responses were rescued by rosiglitazone treatment. Together, these results implicate that abnormal increase of G6PD expression in adipocytes would interfere with insulin signaling and thereby induce insulin resistance in obese subjects.
|
|
|---|
We suggest here that G6PD, one of the major NADPH-producing enzymes, influences fat cell differentiation and lipogenesis, as well as insulin resistance, in obese subjects. Surprisingly, G6PD was expressed most abundantly in fat tissues, and its mRNA increased during adipocyte differentiation (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the expression levels of G6PD mRNA and its enzymatic activity were significantly elevated in the white fat tissues of several obese animal models, including db/db, ob/ob, and DIO mice (Fig. 2 and 3). These observations strongly suggest that G6PD would play important roles in adipocytes, and its abnormal expression would be linked to lipid metabolism disorders frequently found in obese animals. We also demonstrated that ectopic expression of G6PD stimulated both adipogenesis and lipogenesis. Retrovirus overexpression of G6PD in 3T3-L1 cells elevated lipid metabolites, including TG and FFAs, and promoted mRNA expression of most adipocyte marker genes, including FAS, ADD1/SREBP1c, aP2, and PPAR
(Fig. 4). Consistent with these results, G6PD knockdown via siRNA system decreased cellular FFA and TG levels and diminished adipogenic and lipogenic gene expression (Fig. 5), indicating that proper expression of G6PD is required for adipogenesis as well as lipogenesis.
By producing NADPH, it appears that G6PD stimulates lipogenic activity in adipocytes. However, the molecular mechanism by which G6PD overexpression increases cellular FFAs and FFA release into medium is not understood. This might be mediated by the hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL), since HSL is responsible for hydrolysis of accumulated TGs into FFAs and glycerol in adipocytes. In fact, we observed that G6PD-overexpressed adipocytes significantly stimulated HSL expression (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, the fact that FFA levels in adipocytes were regulated by G6PD expression provides an important clue to the link between the high level of G6PD in the fat tissues of obese subjects and metabolic disorders. Many recent studies have suggested that overproduced FFAs derived from adipocytes cause insulin resistance and/or lipid toxicity, which are linked with metabolic diseases such as type II diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and dyslipidemia (3, 28, 60). More recently, it has been shown that intracellular lipid accumulation within skeletal muscle due to increase of circulating FFAs correlates with insulin resistance independent of obesity (11). Therefore, these results strongly suggest that an aberrant increase of G6PD in adipocytes would elevate lipogenic activity, thus overproducing FFAs and TGs, which might eventually accelerate the onset of metabolic disorders.
In spite of these findings, it is difficult to distinguish adipogenesis and lipogenesis during fat cell development because adipogenesis is tightly associated with lipogenesis in fat cells. Although the molecular mechanisms of G6PD in adipogenesis and lipogenesis are not well defined yet, there are several possibilities for how G6PD overexpression is able to enhance adipogenesis and lipogenesis. First, as a rate-limiting enzyme of PPP, G6PD could affect cell growth and differentiation by regulating the PPP process. Previously, it was reported that dehydroepiandrosterone, an inhibitor of G6PD, interferes with adipogenesis by reducing the NADPH/NADP+ ratio (18, 56). Moreover, xylulose-5-phosphate, one of product of PPP, is well known to be associated with regulation of lipogenesis (27, 65). Thus, it is likely that overproduction of xylulose-5-phosphate by G6PD enhanced lipogenesis. Second, it is also possible that NADPH-dependent transcriptional regulators may stimulate adipogenesis or lipogenesis. Recently, NADH-dependent activators or histone deacetylases have been identified, and several target genes involved in the differentiation process are modulated by these NADH-dependent coregulators (17, 25, 37, 71). Lastly, it appears that G6PD could accelerate adipogenesis by promoting free fatty acid metabolism, which might eventually generate ligands of PPAR
, a master transcription factor for adipocyte differentiation. A similar idea has been demonstrated that overexpression of the active form of ADD1/SREBP1c, which coordinates most lipogenic genes, accelerates adipogenesis in a nonadipogenic cell line by producing endogenous PPAR
ligands (31).
As a major tissue for whole-body energy homeostasis, adipose tissue integrates both central and peripheral metabolic signals and orchestrates energy balance. Therefore, abnormal increase or decrease of adipose tissue often causes systemic disorders, also known as metabolic diseases. Adipose tissues are also actively involved in many physiological and pathological processes by expressing various adipocytokines, including leptin, TNF-
, resistin, adiponectin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and FFAs (28, 40, 61). Therefore, adipose tissues locally influence the equilibrium between lipogenesis and lipolysis and systematically contribute to whole-body energy homeostasis by an endocrine mechanism. It is well known that certain adipocytokines are important in provoking the insulin resistance found in many obese and diabetic subjects. For example, the elevation in circulating inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-
and IL-6 mediates insulin resistance and is common in obesity (19, 22, 68). An increased level of TNF-
in obese states leads to insulin resistance via a number of mechanisms, including the decrease of insulin signaling or GLUT4 expression (26, 62). In addition, the newly identified resistin has been proposed to link obesity and insulin resistance (32, 63). Resistin expression is increased in obese animals and decreased by the antidiabetes drug, rosiglitazone (63). Thus, it has been suggested that TNF-
, IL-6, and resistin participate in the regulation of glucose metabolism and that high levels of their expression result in insulin resistance and type II diabetes (4, 41, 49, 68). Unlike these adipocytokines, adiponectin that regulates both glucose and lipid metabolism increases insulin sensitivity (6, 40), and its expression levels are inversely correlated with pathological conditions such as obesity, diabetes, or atherosclerosis (23, 35). In addition, many reports have shown that adiponectin treatment improves insulin resistance, atherosclerosis and lipid metabolism disorders in several animal models (5, 39, 47, 69, 70).
It is of interest to note that the levels of adipocytokines are explicitly changed in G6PD-overexpressed adipocytes. As shown in Fig. 7C, overexpression of G6PD in adipocytes elevated the expression of TNF-
and resistin mRNAs. In contrast, both protein and mRNA levels of adiponectin were decreased (Fig. 7A and C). The molecular mechanism(s) underlying the G6PD-dependent changes in adipocytokine expression remains to be elucidated. Nonetheless, the idea that anomalous increase of G6PD in adipocytes would induce insulin resistance was confirmed by the observation that G6PD-overexpressed adipocytes exhibited downregulated insulin signaling and insulin-dependent glucose uptake (Fig. 8). Taken together, these results strongly support the hypothesis that aberrantly high expression of G6PD in fat tissues of obese animals would result in metabolic disorders including hyperlipidemia and insulin resistance not only by increasing lipogenic activity but also by modulating adipocytokine expression.
Very recently, Koh et al. reported that IDPc is important for modulating fat and cholesterol synthesis as well as adipogenesis by showing that overexpression of IDPc increases 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation, whereas reduced expression of IDPc blocks adipogenesis (34). These results are somewhat similar to our observations that overexpression of G6PD in adipocytes promote lipogenesis and adipogenesis like IDPc overexpression, which could increase eventually cellular NADPH level. However, several evidences suggest that IDPc would have different physiological roles from G6PD. First, compared to G6PD, the mRNA level of IDPc is not significantly changed in the fat tissue of obese mice models (Fig. 2). Second, the mRNA level of G6PD was increased during adipocytes differentiation (Fig. 1), whereas that of IDPc is not changed (34). Furthermore, IDPc transgenic mice show lower fasting blood glucose levels and improvement of glucose sensitivity compared to wild-type mice, even though they exhibit obesity, hyperlipidemia, and fatty liver. In contrast, G6PD overexpression caused insulin resistance in adipocytes (Fig. 8). In accordance with this observation, G6PD overexpression increased the expression of TNF-
and resistin but decreased expression of adiponectin, which is closely related to a decrease in insulin sensitivity (Fig. 8). Thus, G6PD overexpression would lead to abnormal lipid metabolism and insulin signaling, which are different from IDPc overexpression.
In summary, we have established a novel link between G6PD and lipid metabolism disorders in the adipocytes of obese animals (Fig. 9). Our findings that G6PD expression is increased in obese animals and that G6PD elevation in adipocytes changes the levels of lipid metabolites provide strong evidence that obesity induced lipid metabolism disorders and insulin resistance is mediated, at least in part, by G6PD overexpression in fat tissues. Therefore, our observations that an abnormal increase of G6PD in adipocytes modulates lipid metabolism and adipocytokine expression suggest a potential target in the successful development of therapeutic treatment for obese and diabetic patients.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Functional roles of G6PD in adipocytes and its impact on obesity. Obese subjects stimulate G6PD expression in adipocytes and enhance adiposity with elevation of TG and FFAs, which would affect the expression of adipocytokines and metabolic syndromes, including insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and lipotoxicity. See the text for further explanation.
|
This study was supported in part by grants from Stem Cell Research Center of the 21st Century Frontier Research Program, the Molecular and Cellular Biodiscovery Research Program, and the National Research Laboratory Program of Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning. J.P., H.K.R., K.H.K., S.S.C., Y.S.L., and J.B.K. are supported by the BK21 Research Fellowship from the Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development.
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
through the production of endogenous ligand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:4333-4337.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»