Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2005, p. 5687-5698, Vol. 25, No. 13
0270-7306/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.25.13.5687-5698.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Second Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan,1 Center for Animal Resources and Development, Graduate School of Molecular and Genomic Pharmacy, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan,2 Yokohama Research Center, Mitsubishi Pharma Corporation, Yokohama, Japan,3 Department of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan,4 Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan5
Received 16 December 2004/ Returned for modification 3 February 2005/ Accepted 31 March 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HGFA is a serum serine proteinase that specifically converts the inactive proform of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (pro-HGF/SF) to an active form, HGF/SF, in response to tissue injury (26, 27). Because HGF/SF is a pleiotropic factor with multifunctional roles in a variety of cells via its high-affinity receptor, c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase (42), HGFA might be involved in a number of pathophysiological phenomena in vivo (10, 12, 13). Matriptase is also a cognate proteinase for HAI-1 (22). This proteinase is a type 2 transmembrane protein with an extracellular catalytic domain (20, 38). Matriptase also activates pro-HGF/SF (18, 19), and thus, HGFA and matriptase might have compensatory roles in the activation of pro-HGF/SF in vivo. Consequently, HAI-1 would be a critical regulatory molecule in pericellular activation of pro-HGF/SF (13).
In addition to pro-HGF/SF, matriptase also demonstrates processing activities of pro-urokinase-type plasminogen activator and protease-activated receptor 2 (19, 38). Several extracellular matrices are also sensitive to matriptase (22), and processing of filaggrin by matriptase is essential for maturation of epidermal keratinocytes (24). Therefore, cellular matriptase has important roles in a number of cellular events, such as migration, remodeling of extracellular matrix, and cellular maturation, and it is possible that HAI-1 is involved in regulation of these events.
In addition to proteinase inhibitor domains, HAI-1 possesses an LDL receptor class A domain, a transmembrane domain, and a short intracytoplasmic domain (13). The LDL receptor class A domain appears to have a regulatory function in the activation of promatriptase on the cellular surface (30). On the other hand, little is known regarding the function of the intracytoplasmic domain, and it remains to be determined whether HAI-1 mediates signaling from outside to intracellular machineries.
Although several biochemical activities have been demonstrated for HAI-1 in vitro, its role in vivo has yet to be established. An RNA blot analysis indicated that human HAI-1 is expressed across multiple tissues, with the highest mRNA level in the placenta (37). Subsequent immunohistochemical analyses revealed localization of HAI-1 protein on the basolateral surface of epithelial cells (15). In the placenta, HAI-1 was specifically expressed in villous cytotrophoblasts (11). Indeed, specific antibody for HAI-1 was useful to isolate cytotrophoblasts in high purity from human placental tissue in vitro (32). Taken together, these findings suggest that HAI-1 may be important in epithelial function as well as in placental development and function.
In order to address the roles of HAI-1 in vivo, we have generated HAI-1-deficient mice and studied the effects of deficiency on placental and embryonic development.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Positive clones from ICR donors were identified, expanded, and microinjected into the eight-cell stage, and high-percentage chimeric mice were obtained. The chimeras were bred to C57BL/6 mice, and the agouti-colored offspring (F0) with germ line transmission of the targeted mutation were crossed again to C57BL/6 wild-type mice, and heterozygous offspring were crossed to produce homozygous mutant offspring. The genotypes of these mice were assessed by PCR analysis for 45 cycles using primers 5'-GGGTTCTAGAAGTTCTGTGGGTGTAAGGAT-3'(forward primer for wild-type and mutant alleles: P1), 5'-GAGGTTGCCTGGGCAACAAGAACAA-3' (forward primer for wild-type allele: P4), 5'-GGCCCACCTTGTAGGATGCGAGGCAATA-3' (reverse primer for wild-type allele: P2), 5'-AGGGACCTAATAACTTCGTATAGGATACTT-3 (reverse primer for mutant allele: P3), and 5'-GAAGCCATCGATACAGCAGCCATTG-3' (reverse primer for wild-type allele: P5) in order to detect 1,249-bp (P1 versus P2) and 588-bp (P4 versus P5) products for the wild-type allele and a 1,309-bp (P1 versus P3) product for the mutant allele. The thermal cycle profile was 30 s at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C, and 2 min at 72°C.
The genotypes of embryos were determined by performing PCR of genomic DNA obtained from the tail or forelimb of each embryo. Manipulation of ES cells and generation of chimeric mice were achieved at the Center for Animal Resources and Development of Kumamoto University, while mice breeding was done at the Animal Center of the University of Miyazaki under guidelines for animal and recombinant DNA experiments.
Southern and Northern blotting analyses and reverse transcription-PCR. For Southern blot analysis, 10 µg of genomic DNA was digested with HindIII or ScaI/ClaI (New England Biolabs Inc.), electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel, and transferred onto Hybond-N+ nylon membranes (Amersham). The membrane was probed with probe 1 (a 2.7-kbp HindIII/KpnI fragment) or probe 2 (Fig. 1A). Probe 2 was prepared by PCR using primers 5'-TTTGAGACAGGATCTCACGATATAGCTCAA-3' (forward primer) and 5'-ATAAAGGACTTCAGGACATTACCTGGGAT-3' (reverse primer), resulting in a 1,377-bp product (Fig. 1A).
Northern blot analysis for HAI-1 mRNA was performed by using 20 µg of total cellular RNA prepared from mouse embryo and placental tissues at each gestation period (E7.5 to E18.5) (Seegene, Inc.). For a probe, an 823-bp fragment, corresponding to bases 9 to 831 of mouse HAI-1 cDNA (9), was prepared by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. Probes were radiolabeled by random priming with [
-32P]CTP. Membranes were autoradiographed with Kodak XAR-5 film (Eastman Kodak) at 80°C for 18 or 72 h. For internal control of loading, the Northern blot membranes were subsequently hybridized to a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) probe (Clontech).
For RT-PCR, 1 µg of total cellular RNA derived from mouse embryo or placenta was reverse-transcribed by random hexamer and oligo(dT)12 mixed primers and SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). The resultant cDNAs derived from embryos at E9.5 and E10.5 were subjected to PCR for mouse HAI-1. Also, the resultant cDNAs derived from placentas at E9.5 and E10.5 were subjected to PCR for mouse GCM1 (glial cell missing 1), which is expressed in the labyrinth layer of mouse placenta (2, 33, 36), mouse Hand1, which is expressed in trophoblast giant cells (33), mouse Mash2, which is expressed in trophoblast stem cells, ectoplacental cone, and spongiotrophoblasts (33), mouse Tpbpa (trophoblast specific protein
; 4311), which is expressed in spongiotrophoblasts (20), or mouse placental lactogen-1 (Pl-1), which is expressed by trophoblast giant cells (6). For an internal control, RT-PCR for GAPDH mRNA was also performed. The thermal cycle profile was 30 s at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C, and 1 min at 72°C.
Primer sequences were as follows: HAI-1 forward#1, 5'-CTCGCATCCTACAAGGTGGGCCGCT-3', and reverse#1, 5'-TCCAGAACTGGCCTGAGTGCAGCTG-3' with an expected product size of 968 bp; HAI-1 forward#2, 5'-CTCAGACCAACCAGAGGAAA-3', and reverse#2, 5'-GAGATTCCTTGCACATCCTT-3, with a product size of 243 bp; Mash2 forward, 5'-GCCCGGAGCATGGAAGCACACCTT-3', and reverse, 5'-TCAGTAGCCCCCTAACCAACTGGA-3', with a product size of 798 bp; Tpbpa forward, 5'-GAGACATGACTCCTACAATCTTCC-3', and reverse, 5'-TTGCCTAACTTCATACTGCTGTCC-3', with a product size of 407 bp; Pl-1 forward, 5'-TCCGCAGGAATGCAATTGTTGCTG-3', and reverse, 5'-GGGAAAGCATTACAAGTCTGGTTC-3', with a product size of 711 bp; GCM1 forward, 5'-AAACACATCTACAGCTCGGACGACA-3', and reverse, 5'-CTCAGTGCTTCCCCCCAAATCATAA-3', with a product size of 624 bp; Hand1 forward, 5'-CTCTCCAACATGAACCTCGTGGGC-3', and reverse, 5'-GGTCTCACTGGTTTAGCTCCAGCG-3', with a product size of 664 bp; GAPDH forward, 5'-AAAATGGTGAAGGTCGGTGT-3', and reverse, 5'-TTTGATGTTAGTGGGGTCTC-3', with a product size of 255 bp.
For the quantification of GCM1 mRNA levels, real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed using total cellular RNA extracted from E10.5 placentas. Real-time PCR on the LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics) was performed with a master mix of LightCycler DNA Master SyberGreen I (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For an internal control, real-time RT-PCR for ß-actin mRNA was also performed. The thermal cycle profile for GCM1 was 10 s at 95°C, 10 s at 61°C, and 5 s at 72°C. The thermal cycle profile for ß-actin was 10 s at 95°C, 10 s at 54°C, and 5 s at 72°C.
Product amplification specificity was determined by melting curve analysis. Primer sequences were as follows: GCM1 forward, 5'-GGTCATTCCAGGAAGGCGTCCAACT-3', and reverse, 5'-CTCAGTGCTTCCCCCCAAATCATAA-3', with a product size of 131 bp; and ß-actin forward, 5'-AGAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGAC-3', and reverse, 5'-CAATAGTGATGACCTGGCCGT-3', with a product size of 138 bp.
In situ hybridization. In situ hybridization of digoxigenin-labeled probes to frozen sections was described previously (29). Briefly, 4-µm frozen sections were prepared and fixed in freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 16 h. Then the sections were air-dried and rinsed in nuclease-free water and used for the subsequent in situ hybridization study. Probes detecting trophoblast giant cells (expressing Pl-1) and spongiotrophoblast cells (expressing Tpbpa) were prepared to discriminate the different placental layers. The cDNAs of each Pl-1 and Tpbpa were generated by RT-PCR as described above, and subcloned into the TOPO TA cloning vector (Invitrogen). In vitro transcription to generate digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Diagnostics). The same amount of each antisense or sense probe was used for hybridization, in which the sense probe was used as a negative control. The in situ hybridization reaction was performed using a fully automated in situ hybridization apparatus (Ventana HX System Discovery and RiboMap system; Ventana), according to the manufacturer's instruction. Hybridization was performed by using 1 ng per slide of digoxigenin-labeled RNA probe at 65°C for 6 h. After the hybridization, signals were detected by biotin-labeled antidigoxigenin antibody. The reaction was detected with a BlueMap kit (Ventana) and counterstained with nuclear fast red.
Histology and immunohistochemistry. After cervical dislocation of pregnant mice, the embryo and placenta tissue were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS overnight and then dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Four-µm-thick sections were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemistry, the sections were processed for antigen retrieval (autoclaving in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0, or 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, for 5 min), followed by treatment with 3% H2O2 in PBS for 10 min and washed in PBS twice. After blocking in 3% bovine serum albumin and 10% normal goat serum in PBS for 1 h at room temperature, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies for 16 h at 4°C.
The anti-mouse HAI-1 was a rabbit polyclonal antibody prepared by immunizing a synthesized peptide which corresponds to the carboxyl terminus of intracytoplasmic domain of mouse HAI-1 (Pro484 to Leu507) (29). This epitope corresponded to the outside of the deleted portion by insertion of the neomycin resistance gene cassette (Fig. 1A). After immunization, immunoglobulin G (IgG) was prepared from the rabbit serum, followed by immunopurification using the antigen-peptide affinity column. The specificity of the antibody was verified by immunoblot analysis using cellular extracts of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with the pCIneo expression vector (Promega) containing full-length mouse HAI-1 cDNA. The procedures for protein extraction and immunoblot were described previously (29). Ki-67 monoclonal rat anti-mouse antibody (clone TEC-3, DAKO) (1:50 dilution) and anti-cleaved caspase-3 (Asp175) rabbit polyclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) were also used. Negative controls consisted of omission of the primary antibody. The sections were then washed in PBS and incubated with Envision-labeled polymer reagent (DAKO) or with Histofine simple stain mouse MAX-PO (rat) reagent (NICHIREI) for 45 min at 37°C. The reaction was revealed with nickel, cobalt-3,3'-diaminobenzidine. (Immunopure metal enhanced DAB substrate kit; Pierce), and the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.
BrdU labeling. Timed pregnant mice from heterozygous matings were injected intraperitoneally at E9.5 with 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) (50 µg/g of body weight; Sigma). The mice were sacrificed 1.5 h after injection, and the uteri were removed and used for the immunohistochemical analysis with mouse monoclonal antibody against BrdU (clone BU33; Sigma). Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections were pretreated with 2 N HCl for 30 min at 37°C followed by treatment with 0.02% trypsin in CaCl2 for 20 min. Then the sections were immunostained with anti-BrdU antibody at a dilution of 1:200 for 16 h at 4°C. The sections were then washed in PBS and incubated with Envision-labeled polymer reagent (DAKO) for 45 min at 37°C. The reaction was revealed as described above, and the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Transplacental passage of rhodamine 123. Timed pregnant mice from heterozygous matings were injected intraperitoneally at E9.5 with rhodamine 123 (1 µg/g of body weight; DOJINDO Laboratories). The mice were sacrificed 2 h or 6 h after the injection, and the embryos were removed from the uteri and analyzed with a fluorescence stereomicroscope (MZ16F; Leica Microsystems) with yellow fluorescent protein filter (excitation at 510 and 20 nm, emission at 560 and 40 nm). The fluorescence intensity in the entire embryo was measured with Leica FW4000TZ software (Leica Microsystems).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lack of functional HAI-1 resulted in retarded intrauterine growth and development and subsequent lethality around E10.5. Heterozygous (HAI-1+/) mice were intercrossed to produce HAI-1 homozygous mutant (HAI-1/) offspring. Among 21 live-born progeny derived from this mating of two independent ES clones, no viable homozygous mutant offspring (HAI-1/) were identified, whereas 35 (32.7%) wild-type (HAI-1+/+) and 72 (68.3%) heterozygous (HAI-1+/) offspring were obtained, indicating that HAI-1/ mice died as embryos (data not shown). In order to determine the time point of lethality and to analyze the morphological phenotype of mutant embryos, embryos at different stages of gestation were analyzed for genotype by PCR (Fig. 1B) and Southern blot analyses (Fig. 1C). In parallel, we performed RT-PCR analysis with use of the total RNA of E9.5 and E10.5 embryos. The results indicated that normal HAI-1 mRNA was absent in homozygous HAI-1/ embryos and appeared to be decreased relative to wild-type levels in HAI-1+/ embryos (Fig. 1D). Normal HAI-1 protein was also not detectable in HAI-1/ embryos (see below at Fig. 4 and 6).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-kDa carboxyl-terminal fragment produced by ectodomain shedding of HAI-1 (29) were specifically detected with this antibody by an immunoblot analysis. Lack of functional HAI-1 resulted in impaired formation of labyrinth layer of placenta. In humans, HAI-1 mRNA is most abundant in placental tissue (11, 37). Because of similar placental expression of HAI-1 in mice, we assumed that the growth retardation and embryonic lethality of HAI-1 mutant embryos may be caused by impaired placental function due to HAI-1 deficiency. Therefore, we inspected the placental tissues of HAI-1/ embryos histologically. At E8.5, fusion of the chorion and allantois had occurred in HAI-1/ gestations, however, the chorionic plate was thin and branching of fetal vessels was insufficient compared with HAI-1+/ and HAI-1+/+ placentas (Fig. 5A, B, and C). Notable differences were not observed between HAI-1+/ and HAI-1+/+ placentas.
|
|
Analysis of trophoblast marker gene expression in HAI-1/ placentas. To further analyze the placental defects in HAI-1/ gestations, we performed in situ hybridization and RT-PCR analysis for expression of several trophoblast markers (Fig. 8). At E9.5, trophoblast giant cells expressing Pl-1 (6) were present in a similar pattern in wild-type (HAI-1+/+) and mutant (HAI-1/) placentas (Fig. 8A). Spongiotrophoblasts expressing Tpbpa (20) were also detected in HAI-1/ placenta (Fig. 8B). With RT-PCR analyses, preservation of expression of Pl-1 and Tpbpa mRNAs was confirmed in HAI-1/ placenta; in addition, the levels of Mash2 and Hand1 mRNAs were not altered significantly (Fig. 8C). In contrast, mRNA for GCM1, expressed specifically by labyrinthine trophoblasts (2, 33, 36), was significantly decreased in HAI-1/ placenta at E9.5 and E10.5 (Fig. 8D and E). These results confirmed that the differentiated labyrinthine trophoblasts were specifically and significantly affected by the absence of functional HAI-1.
|
|
Finally, we performed immunohistochemistry with an antibody that specifically recognizes the activated cleaved form of caspase-3. At E9.5, scattered cells that were positive for activated caspase-3 were observed in HAI-1/ embryos but not in normal wild-type embryos (Fig. 9C, inset). At E10.5, HAI-1/ embryos showed significantly enhanced labeling of active caspase-3 in many different tissues, indicating widespread apoptosis (Fig. 9C). The distribution of apoptotic cells was not related to the distribution of HAI-1-expressing cells observed in Fig. 4A. Taken together, these data suggest that death of HAI-1/ embryos is caused by severely impaired placental function resulting in massive apoptosis of the embryonic cells.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Death of embryos around E10.5 is consistent with primary placental failure, which is a common cause of midgestation embryonic lethality in mice (34). One common cause of placental failure is failure of chorioallantoic fusion (34). However, chorioallantoic attachment and fusion occurred in HAI-1/ mice. Abnormal signaling in early trophoblast development is also a known cause of impaired placental development (34). This is also unlikely for HAI-1/ mice, because both the spongiotrophoblast and giant cell layers were formed. Another common cause of placental failure is failure of chorioallantoic branching and labyrinthine development. To date, studies using mouse mutants have revealed that several molecules are critically involved in these steps (34). Among them, mice deficient for GCM1 appear to have the phenotype most similar to that of our HAI-1 knockout mice (2, 33, 36).
In GCM1/ mice, the chorioallantoic interface remained flat up to 3 days after allantoic attachment and branching morphogenesis in the chorioallantoic placenta was severely impaired (2, 36). Moreover, similar to the findings seen with HAI-1/ mice, the spongiotrophoblast layer and giant cell layer were normal in GCM1/ mice (2, 36). Indeed, when a series of trophoblast markers were analyzed in HAI-1/ placenta, the GCM1 mRNA level, a marker for labyrinthine trophoblasts, was significantly decreased, whereas the mRNA levels of other trophoblast markers such as Pl-1 (for trophoblast giant cell), Hand1 (trophoblast giant cell), Tpbpa (spongiotrophoblast), and Mash2 (trophoblast stem cell, ectoplacental cone and spongiotrophoblast) showed no apparent alteration. However, unlike GCM1/ placentas, in which syncytiotrophoblasts are absent (2, 36), some syncytiotrophoblast-like cells were observed in HAI-1/ placenta.
In human placenta, GCM1 is expressed by cytotrophoblasts (3), and this localization pattern also resembles that of HAI-1 (11). However, there are some differences between the localization of GCM1 and HAI-1 in human placenta in detail. Human HAI-1 is expressed by villous cytotrophoblasts at the base of villi immediately associated with the basement membrane but not by the extravillous cytotrophoblasts (11). On the other hand, human GCM1 is expressed by the extravillous cytotrophoblasts, and its mRNA is detectable only in a subset of villous cytotrophoblasts immediately at the base of villi (3). Mice lacking the 90-kDa heat shock protein ß (HSP90ß) may also show a phenotype similar to that of HAI-1/ mice (40). In contrast to HAI-1 and GCM1, HSP90ß is expressed ubiquitously (40).
The question then is how the loss of functional HAI-1 induced this observed pathology of the labyrinth layer. HAI-1 belongs to a unique class of serine proteinase inhibitors that are synthesized as a type 1 transmembrane protein (13). HAI-1 was originally identified as a potent inhibitor of HGFA (37), a serine proteinase that specifically activates pro-HGF/SF (13, 26, 27). HAI-1 is also a cognate inhibitor of matriptase, another activator of pro-HGF/SF (18, 19). Importantly, evidence indicates that HAI-1 is not simply an inhibitor of HGFA and matriptase but also a critical regulator of the optimal activities of these enzymes in the pericellular microenvironment (14, 30). Therefore, the phenotype observed in HAI-1/ mice might be a result of dysregulated activation of pro-HGF/SF.
The observations that both HGF/SF knockout and c-Met (HGF/SF receptor) knockout mice show abnormalities of the placental labyrinth layer (5, 35, 39) may be compatible with this hypothesis. However, the phenotypic manifestations of HGF/SF and c-Met knockouts are different from the effects of HAI-1 ablation in detail. Compared with the effects of the HAI-1/ genotype, the effects of HGF/SF or c-Met deficiency become apparent at later periods of embryonic development, and the resulting defects in the labyrinth layer are less severe (5, 35, 39). The fact that the lethal point of HGF/SF/ embryos (E12.5 to E14.5) is later than that of HAI-1/ embryos (around E10.5) indicates that the placental abnormalities in HAI-1/ are not simply caused by impaired regulation of HGF/SF activity. Moreover, the phenotypes of HGFA knockout (10) and matriptase knockout (23) mice are quite different from the phenotype seen with HAI-1 knockout mice, as neither HGFA nor matriptase knockout mice show apparent placental abnormalities. Taken altogether, it is reasonable to speculate that, in addition to the regulatory roles of HGFA and matriptase activities that are important in pro-HGF/SF activation, HAI-1 might have another unknown but important role in vivo.
To date, many genes have been reported to be critically involved in the early stage of placental development. Most are transcription factors, growth factors/growth factor receptors, and molecules involved in signal transduction (7, 33, 34). HAI-1 is the first example of a proteinase inhibitor that is critically involved in this stage. Because HAI-1 is a membrane-associated Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitor, the membrane form of HAI-1 may mediate important outside-in or inside-out signaling in labyrinthine trophoblasts acting on the cell surface. This issue will be the focus of future experiments and will help us to understand the role of this unique class of serine proteinase inhibitors.
Alternatively, HAI-1 may have an unknown target proteinase that is critically involved in the regulation of labyrinthine differentiation. As a protein homologous to HAI-1, HAI-2 has been reported as another inhibitor of HGFA (17). HAI-2 is also a membrane-associated Kunitz-type inhibitor. However, evidence suggests that the physiological role of HAI-2 is different from that of HAI-1 (13, 37). Importantly, mice lacking HAI-2 function show embryonic lethality around E8.5 accompanying a primary gastrulation defect (25). Clearly, HAI-1 and HAI-2 have separate, nonredundant functions in vivo, and these membrane-associated inhibitors might have yet undefined though very important biological functions in vivo. Although the placental labyrinth layer was the only tissue that showed obvious developmental defects in these HAI-1/ gestations, a later role for HAI-1 in development of the embryo proper cannot be excluded; expression of HAI-1 increased in the normal embryo over the course of the gestation period, and expression was abundantly observed in the epithelial cells of the mature embryo. In this regard, further experiments using tetraploid rescue techniques or a conditional knockout strategy would be required.
In conclusion, HAI-1 is required at postimplantation stages for generation of the organized branching structure with differentiated trophoblasts that makes up the labyrinth layer of the placenta. This result is compatible with our previous observation that HAI-1 is specifically expressed in the villous cytotrophoblasts of human placenta (11, 32). Therefore, it will be very interesting to study whether this expression is affected in pathological conditions. Furthermore, understanding the molecular mechanism underlying the placental failure in HAI-1/ mice in more detail may provide insight into the pathophysiology of intrauterine growth retardation and its treatment. Finally, because the effects of HAI-1 knockout on the development of the placenta are more severe than those observed in HGF/SF and c-Met knockouts, HAI-1 may have another important role in vivo that is independent of its regulatory function in the activation of pro-HGF/SF. Whether HAI-1 has a role at later times in the development of the embryo proper or in the adult will be clarified only when tetraploid rescue experiments or conditional knockout experiments have been performed.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 14370079 and (C) 15590351 and the 21st Century COE program (Life Science) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan, and by a Grant-in-Aid for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (15-13).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MAP kinase in placental but not embryonic cardiovascular development. Mol. Cell 6:109-116.[CrossRef][Medline]2. Anson-Cartwright., L., K. Dawson, D. Holmyard, S. J. Fisher, R. A. Lazzarini, and J. C. Cross. 2000. The glial cells missing-1 protein is essential for branching morphogenesis in the chorioallantoic placenta. Nat. Genet. 25:311-314.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Baczyk, D., A. Satkunaratnam, B. Nait-Oumensmar, B. Huppertz, J. C. Cross, and J. C. P. Kingdom. 2004. Complex patterns of GCM1 mRNA and protein in villous and extravillous trophoblast cells of the human placenta. Placenta 25:553-559.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Barak, Y., M. C. Nelson, E. S. Ong, Y. Z. Jones, P. Ruiz-Lozano, K. R. Chien, A. Koder, and R. M. Evans. 1999. PPAR
is required for placental, cardiac, and adipose tissue development. Mol. Cell 4:585-595.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Bladt, F., D. Reithmacher, S. Isenmann, A. Aguzzi, and C. Birchmeier. 1995. Essential role for the c-met receptor in the migration of myogenic precursor cells into the limb bud. Nature 376:768-771.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Colosi, P., F. Talamantes, and D. I. Linzer. 1987. Molecular cloning and expression of mouse placental lactogen I complementary deoxyribonucleic acid. Mol. Endocrinol. 1:767-776.[Abstract]
7. Ihle, J. N. 2000. The challenges of translating knockout phenotype into gene function. Cell 102:131-134.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Itoh, H., H. Kataoka, J. Y. Meng, R. Hamasuna, N. Kitamura, and M. Koono. 2001. Mouse hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1 (HAI-1) and type 2 (HAI-2)/placental bikunin genes and their promoters. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1519:92-95.[Medline]
9. Itoh, H., H. Kataoka, M. Tomita, R. Hamasuna, Y. Nawa, N. Kitamura, and M. Koono. 2000. Upregulation of HGF activator inhibitor type 1 but not type 2 along with regeneration of intestinal mucosa. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 278:G635-G643.
10. Itoh, H., S. Naganuma, N. Takeda, S. Miyata, S. Uchinokura, T. Fukushima, S. Uchiyama, H. Tanaka, K. Nagaike, T. Shimomura, K. Miyazawa, G. Yamada, N. Kitamura, M. Koono, and H. Kataoka. 2004. Regeneration of injured intestinal mucosa is impaired in hepatocyte growth factor activator-deficient mice. Gastroenterology 127:1423-1435.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Kataoka, H., J. Y. Meng, H. Itoh, R. Hamasuna, T. Shimomura, T. Suganuma, and M. Koono. 2000. Localization of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1 in Langhans' cells of human placenta. Histochem. Cell Biol. 114:469-475.[Medline]
12. Kataoka, H., R. Hamasuna, H. Itoh, N. Kitamura, and M. Koono. 2000. Activation of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor in colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 60:6148-6159.
13. Kataoka, H., S. Miyata, S. Uchinokura, and H. Itoh. 2003. Roles of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) activator and HGF activator inhibitor in the pericellular activation of HGF/scatter factor. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 22:223-236.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Kataoka, H., T. Shimomura, T. Kawaguchi, R. Hamasuna, H. Itoh, N. Kitamura, K. Miyazawa, and M. Koono. 2000. Hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1 is a specific cell surface binding protein of hepatocyte growth factor activator(HGFA) and regulates HGFA activity in the pericellular microenvironment. J. Biol. Chem. 275:40453-40462.
15. Kataoka, H., T. Suganuma, T. Shimomura, H. Itoh, N. Kitamura, K. Nabeshima, and M. Koono. 1999. Distribution of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1(HAI-1) in human tissues: cellular surface localization of HAI-1 in simple columnar epithelium and its modulated expression in injured and regenerative tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 47:673-682.
16. Kaufmann, M. H. 1992. Differentiation of the placenta, p. 472-477. In M. H. Kaufmann (ed.), The atlas of mouse development, 6th ed. Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
17. Kawaguchi, T., L. Qin, T. Shimomura, J. Kondo, K. Matsumoto, K. Denda, and N. Kitamura. 1997. Purification and cloning of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 2, a Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 272:27558-27564.
18. Kirchhofer, D., M. Peek, W. Li, J. Stamos, C. Eigenbrot, S. Kadkhodayan, J. M. Elliot, R. T. Corpuz, R. A. Lazarus, and P. Moran. 2003. Tissue expression, protease specificity, and Kunitz domain functions of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor-1B (HAI-1B), a new splice variant of HAI-1. J. Biol. Chem. 278:36341-36349.
19. Lee, S. L., R. B. Dickson, and C. Y. Lin. 2000. Activation of hepatocyte growth factor and urokinase/plasminogen activator by matriptase, an epithelial membrane serine protease. J. Biol. Chem. 275:36720-36725.
20. Lescin, K. R., S. Varmuza, and J. Rossant. 1988. Isolation and characterization of a novel trophoblast-specific cDNA in the mouse. Genes Dev. 2:1639-1646.
21. Lin, C. Y., J. Anders, M. Johnson, and R. B. Dickson. 1999. Purification and characterization of a complex containing matriptase and a Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor from human milk. J. Biol. Chem. 274:18237-18242.
22. Lin, C. Y., J. Anders, M. Johnson, Q. A. Sang, and R. B. Dickson. 1999. Molecular cloning of cDNA for matriptase, a matrix-degrading serine protease with trypsin-like activity. J. Biol. Chem. 274:18231-18236.
23. List, K., C. C. Haudenschild, R. Szabo, W. J. Chen, S. M. Wahl, W. Swaim, L. H. Engelholm, N. Behrend, and T. H. Bugge. 2002. Matriptase/MT-SP1 is required for postnatal survival, epidermal barrier function, hair follicle development, and thymic homeostasis. Oncogene 21:3765-3779.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. List, K., R. Szabo, P. W. Wertz, J. Segre, C. C. Haudenschild, S. Y. Kim, and T. H. Bugge. 2003. Loss of proteolytically processed filaggrin caused by epidermal deletion of Matriptase/MT-SP1. J. Cell Biol. 163:901-910.
25. Mitchell, K. J., K. I. Pinson, O. G. Kelly, J. Brennan, J. Zupicich, P. Scherz, P. A. Leighton, L. V. Goodrich, X. Lu, B. J. Avery, P. Tate, K. Dill, E. Pangilian, P. Wakenight, M. Tessier-Lavigne, and W. C. Skarnes. 2001. Functional analysis of secreted and transmembrane proteins critical to mouse development. Nat. Genet. 28:241-249.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Miyazawa, K., T. Shimomura, A. Kitamura, J. Kondo, Y. Morimoto, and N. Kitamura. 1993. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of the cDNA for a human serine protease responsible for activation of hepatocyte growth factor. J. Biol. Chem. 268:10024-10028.
27. Miyazawa, K., T. Shimomura, and N. Kitamura. 1996. Activation of hepatocyte growth factor in the injured tissues is mediated by hepatocyte growth factor activator. J. Biol. Chem. 271:3615-3618.
28. Moser, M., Y. Li, K. Vaupel, D. Kretzschmar, R. Kluge, P. Glynn, and R. Buettner. 2004. Placental failure and impaired vasculogenesis result in embryonic lethality for neuropathy target esterase-deficient mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:1667-1679.
29. Nagaike, K., K. Kohama, S. Uchiyama, H. Tanaka, K. Chijiiwa, H. Itoh, and H. Kataoka. 2004. Paradoxically enhanced immunoreactivity of hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor type 1(HAI-1) in cancer cells at the invasion front. Cancer Sci. 95:728-735.[Medline]
30. Oberst, M. D., C. A. Williams, R. B. Dickson, M. D. Johnson, and C. Y. Lin. 2003. The activation of matriptase requires its noncatalytic domains, serine protease domain, and its cognate inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 278:26773-26779.
31. Pavek, P., F. Staud, Z. Fendrich, H. Sklenarova, A. Libra, M. Novotna, M. Kopecky, M. Nobilis, and V. Semecky. 2003. Examination of the functional activity of P-glycoprotein in the rat placental barrier using rhodamine 123. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 305:1239-1250.
32. Pötgens, A. J. G., H. Kataoka, S. Ferstl, H. G. Frank, and P. Kaufmann. 2003. A positive immunoselection method to isolate villous cytotrophoblast cells from first trimester and term placenta to high purity. Placenta 24:412-423.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Roberts, R. M., T. Ezashi, and P. Das. 2004. Trophoblast gene expression: Transcription factors in the specification of early trophoblast. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2:1-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Rossant, J., and J. C. Cross. 2001. Placental development: lessons from mouse mutants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:538-548.[Medline]
35. Schmidt, C., F. Bladt, S. Goedecke, V. Brinkmann, W. Zschiesche, M. Sharpe, E. Gherardi, and C. Birchmeler. 1995. Scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor is essential for liver development. Nature 373:699-702.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Schreiber, J., E. Riethmacher-Sonnenberg, D. Riethmacher, E. E. Tuerk, J. Enderich, M. R. Bösl, and M. Wegner. 2000. Placental failure in mice lacking the mammalian homolog of glial cell missing, GCMa. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2466-2474.
37. Shimomura, T., K. Denda, A. Kitamura, T. Kawaguchi, M. Kito, J. Kondo, S. Kagaya, L. Qin, H. Takata, K. Miyazawa, and N. Kitamura. 1997. Hepatocyte growth factor activator inhibitor, a novel Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor. J. Biol. Chem. 272:6370-6376.
38. Takeuchi, T., J. L. Harris, W. Huang, K. W. Yan, S. R. Coughlin, and C. S. Craik. 2000. Cellular localization of membrane-type serine protease 1 and identification of protease-activated receptor-2 and single-chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator as substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 275:26333-26342.
39. Uehara, Y., O. Minowa, C. Mori, K. Shiota, J. Kuno, T. Noda, and N. Kitamura. 1995. Placental defect and embryonic lethality in mice lacking hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor. Nature 373:702-705.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Voss, A. K., T. Thomas, and P. Gruss. 2000. Mice lacking HSP90ßfail to develop a placental labyrinth. Development 127:1-11.[Abstract]
41. Yagi, T., T. Tokunaga, Y. Furuta, S. Nada, M. Yoshida, T. Tsukuda, Y. Saga, N. Takeda, Y. Ikawa, and S. Aizawa. 1993. A novel ES cell line, TT2, with high germline-differentiating potency. Anal. Biochem. 214:70-76.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Zhang, Y. W., and G. F. Vande Wounde. 2003. HGF/SF-Met signaling in the control of branching morphogenesis and invasion. J. Cell Biochem. 88:408-417.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||