MCB Try AEM online
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Compe, E.
Right arrow Articles by Egly, J.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Compe, E.
Right arrow Articles by Egly, J.-M.
Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2005, p. 6065-6076, Vol. 25, No. 14
0270-7306/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.25.14.6065-6076.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Dysregulation of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Target Genes by XPD Mutations

Emmanuel Compe,1 Pascal Drané,1 Camille Laurent,1 Karin Diderich,2 Cathy Braun,1 Jan H. J. Hoeijmakers,2 and Jean-Marc Egly1*

Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, BP 10142, 67404 Illkirch Cedex, C. U. Strasbourg, France,1 MGC-Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Centre for Biomedical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands2

Received 9 February 2005/ Returned for modification 31 March 2005/ Accepted 27 April 2005


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mutations in the XPD subunit of TFIIH give rise to human genetic disorders initially defined as DNA repair syndromes. Nevertheless, xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) group D (XP-D) patients develop clinical features such as hypoplasia of the adipose tissue, implying a putative transcriptional defect. Knowing that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are implicated in lipid metabolism, we investigated the expression of PPAR target genes in the adipose tissues and the livers of XPD-deficient mice and found that (i) some genes are abnormally overexpressed in a ligand-independent manner which parallels an increase in the recruitment of RNA polymerase (pol) II but not PPARs on their promoter and (ii) upon treatment with PPAR ligands, other genes are much less induced compared to the wild type, which is due to a lower recruitment of both PPARs and RNA pol II. The defect in transactivation by PPARs is likely attributable to their weaker phosphorylation by the cdk7 kinase of TFIIH. Having identified the phosphorylated residues in PPAR isotypes, we demonstrate how their transactivation defect in XPD-deficient cells can be circumvented by overexpression of either a wild-type XPD or a constitutively phosphorylated PPAR S/E. This work emphasizes that underphosphorylation of PPARs affects their transactivation and consequently the expression of PPAR target genes, thus contributing in part to the XP-D phenotype.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
XPD mutations cause the rare autosomal recessive disorder xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), primarily defined as a DNA repair defect, which is sometimes associated with Cockayne syndrome, as well as trichothiodystrophy (TTD) (29, 47). Besides the potential for carcinogenesis caused by photosensitivity, these patients exhibit a large spectrum of clinical abnormalities, such as immature sexual development, mental retardation, skeletal abnormalities, and dwarfism. The principal hallmark of TTD patients is brittle hair and nails, caused by a reduction in cysteine-rich matrix proteins. Some TTD patients have ichthyotic skin and an unusual face that appears aged due to the lack of subcutaneous fatty tissue (15, 21). In women, the breast tissue may be completely absent in spite of normal development of the nipples. Obviously, these various clinical features cannot solely be explained by DNA repair defects (5). While one cannot exclude the biological effects due to the damage itself (that can in some cases prevent one of the ongoing cellular mechanism such as replication or transcription), it however has to be pointed out that the product of the XPD gene belongs to the TFIIH complex, which is involved in the DNA repair as well as in the transcription process.

TFIIH can be resolved into two subcomplexes: the core-TFIIH (containing in particular the XPB helicase) and the cdk-activating kinase (CAK) complex containing the cyclin-dependent kinase cdk7 (40). The core-TFIIH and CAK subcomplexes are bridged by the XPD helicase subunit, which interacts with p44 on the one side and MAT1 on the other side (9, 41). In the nucleotide excision reaction, TFIIH, once recruited on the damaged DNA already recognized by the XPC-HR23B factor, unwinds the DNA around the lesion upon addition of ATP to allow the recruitment of XPA, RPA, XPG, and XPF/ERCC1 repair factors (37). When XPD is mutated in the C-terminal end, its interaction with its regulatory partner p44 is weakened (9). In that case, the XPD helicase is no longer upregulated by p44 and cannot optimally operate in the nucleotide excision repair process (49). In the transcription process, TFIIH together with TFIIA, -B, -D, -E, and -F basal transcription factors and RNA polymerase (pol) II, participates in the initiation of RNA synthesis by opening the promoter around the start site via its XPB helicase (18) and by phosphorylating via its cdk7 kinase the carboxy-terminal domain of the largest subunit of RNA pol II and some transcriptional activators including nuclear receptors (7, 12, 25, 32, 38).

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors PPAR{alpha}, -{gamma}, and -{delta} are ligand-activated nuclear receptors which form heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor and bind to PPAR-responsive elements of numerous target genes (26). These transcription factors regulate lipid metabolism (3, 28) and are activated by fatty acids, their derivatives, and/or synthetic compounds (11). PPAR{alpha} enhances fatty acid combustion in the liver by upregulating genes encoding enzymes in the ß-oxidation pathway and hence mediates the hypolipidemic effects of fibrates (35). In contrast, PPAR{gamma} serves as an essential regulator of adipocyte differentiation and promotes lipid storage in mature adipocytes (39). Two PPAR{gamma} isoforms (PPAR{gamma}1 and -2) are produced by the differential use of three promoters and alternative splicing (reviewed in reference 11). Lastly, PPAR{delta} regulates fat burning in peripheral tissues by coordinating fatty acid oxidation and energy expenditure (48). Besides their function in lipid metabolism, many potential roles for PPARs have been named in pathological states observed in XP group D (XP-D) patients, such as infertility and cancers (4).

In order to evaluate whether a transcriptional defect takes part in the XP-D phenotype, we focused on a putative connection between the hypoplasia of adipose tissue observed in XP-D patients and a defect in transactivation by PPARs. Contrary to what was expected, we observed that the expression of PPAR{gamma} target genes is differently affected in the adipose tissues from XPD/TTD-deficient mice. Indeed, whereas some of these genes are abnormally overexpressed in a ligand-independent manner, we also observed a lower induction of PPAR{gamma} target genes after treatment with a specific ligand. We found that the defect in transactivation by PPARs in XPD-deficient cells (isolated from both TTD mice and XP-D patients) is associated with a weaker phosphorylation of these nuclear receptors by cdk7. Having identified the phosphorylated residues in the PPAR isotypes, we demonstrate how their transactivation defect in XP-D-deficient cells can be circumvented upon the overexpression of either wild-type (WT) XPD or PPAR S/E, in which the glutamic acid mimics a constitutively phosphorylated residue.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals and morphological studies. The generation of the TTD mouse line R722W has been described previously (10). Mice were fed standard chow with a 5% (wt/wt) fat content (R03 breeding diet; UAR, Villemoisson, France). Fragments of adipose tissues and liver were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 48 h prior to paraffin embedding. Hematoxylin-and-eosin (H&E)-stained sections were 5 µm thick, while frozen sections for oil red-O staining were 15 µm thick. Apoptosis was assessed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) method using the ApopTag kit (Chemicon Int.). Briefly, liver sections were deparaffinized, hydrated, and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in 20 mg/ml proteinase K. After being thoroughly washed in distilled water and immersed in terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (TDT) buffer for 10 min at room temperature, the sections were incubated in TDT buffer, digoxigenin dUTP, and TDT for 60 min in a humidified chamber at 37°C. The reaction was visualized by an immunohistochemical technique using anti-digoxigenin-peroxidase antibodies. Cell regeneration was evaluated by immunohistochemical studies using antibody against the cell proliferation marker Ki67 according to the manufacturer's instructions (Novocastra). Fragments of various tissues were also frozen for RNA and protein extraction. Three-month-old mice were treated by oral gavage with rosiglitazone (10 mg/kg body weight for 3 days; GlaxoSmithKline), WY14643 (100 mg/kg body weight for 20 h; Calbiochem), or the corresponding vehicle (ethanol at 3 ml/kg or dimethyl sulfoxide at 3 ml/kg, respectively).

Retrotranscription and real-time quantitative PCR. RNAs were prepared with TRIzol (GIBCO-BRL) and treated with RQ1 DNase (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For reverse transcriptase PCR, total RNA (2 µg) was reverse transcribed with Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) using random hexanucleotides. Real-time quantitative PCR was done using the FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green kit and the LightCycler apparatus (Roche Diagnostic). The primer sequences and the PCR conditions for each target gene are available upon request.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). Hepatic fragments were fixed by adding 37% formaldehyde to a final concentration of 1% and incubated for 15 min at room temperature and 1 h at 4°C. Fragments of white adipose tissue (WAT) and brown adipose tissue (BAT) were pooled from tissues of two animals and fixed as described above. Cross-linking was stopped by addition of glycine to a final concentration of 0.125 M. Fragments were washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline and treated with sonicate buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 140 mM NaCl 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 0.1% Na-deoxycholate) containing protease inhibitors. Fragments were homogenized, and cell lysates were then sheared extensively by sonication on ice to obtain fragments of 200 to 600 bp (as revealed by ethidium bromide staining of aliquots run on agarose gels). Samples were centrifuged to pellet debris, and an aliquot was taken for gel analysis and inputs. Soluble chromatins were pretreated for 2 h at 4°C with protein G (previously saturated with 1 mg/ml of sonicated salmon sperm DNA and 1 mg/ml of bovine serum albumin). Samples were then incubated overnight at 4°C with antibodies of interest; protein G (previously saturated) was then added, and the mixture was incubated for 2 h at 4°C. Sepharose beads were washed twice for 10 min at 4°C with wash 1 (sonicate buffer with 500 mM NaCl) and then with wash 2 (0.25 M LiCl, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0]), and finally with Tris-EDTA (TE; pH 8.0). Immune complexes were eluted from the beads with 1% SDS in TE (pH 8.0), and protein-DNA cross-links were reversed by adding 200 mM NaCl and heating for 5 h at 65°C. After treatment with proteinase K (2 h at 42°C), the samples were purified by phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction and precipitated with ethanol. One-fifteenth of the immunoprecipitated DNA and 1% of the input DNA were quantified by real-time quantitative PCR (see above). Results are expressed relative to the amount of input DNA per ChIP.

Antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies against the TFIIH subunits, TATA box binding protein (TBP), and RNA pol II were produced by the Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire facility. Polyclonal antibodies against VDR (sc-9164; Santa Cruz), PPAR{alpha} (H-98; Santa Cruz), PPAR{alpha}/S12 (PA1-820; ABR), and PPAR{delta} (K-20; Santa Cruz) and monoclonal antibodies raised against PPAR{gamma} (E-8 for Western blotting [Santa Cruz], AB12409 for immunoprecipitation [AB Cam LTD]) or phosphorylated S84/S112 PPAR{gamma}1/2 (1F5; Euromedex) were purchased.

Coimmunoprecipitation assays. PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma}2 cDNAs were inserted into the pVL1392 vector, and the resulting vectors were recombined with baculovirus DNA (Baculogold; Pharmingen) as previously described (13). Sf9 cells were infected with combinations of baculoviruses encoding the subunits of TFIIH (45) and either VDR (31), PPAR{alpha}, or PPAR{gamma}2. Whole-cell extracts were incubated with an antibody directed against either the p44 subunit of TFIIH, VDR, or the corresponding PPAR isotype. After extensive washing (300 mM KCl), bound proteins were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and revealed by immunoblotting.

Plasmids and construction of PPAR mutants. Specific PCR products including the entire coding sequence, the truncated form without the A/B domain, or the A/B domain alone for each PPAR isotype were inserted into the NdeI cloning site of the prokaryotic pET15b expression vector (Novagen). Serine residue changes to alanine or glutamic acid were introduced using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene).

In vitro kinase assays. His fusion proteins were produced into Escherichia coli strain BL21 and purified on Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose (Qiagen). Equal amounts (1 µg) of recombinant proteins were incubated with purified recombinant CAK complex (40) or highly purified TFIIH in the presence of [{gamma}-32P]ATP (0.14 µM).

Mass spectrometry. PPAR A/B domains were in vitro phosphorylated by CAK, purified by SDS-PAGE, and in gel digested with Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease (for PPAR{alpha} and -{gamma}) or Asp-N endoproteinase (for PPAR{delta}). Peptide extracts (0.5 ml) were mixed with an equal volume of saturated 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, dissolved in 20% acetonitrile, and applied to the target. Mass measurements were carried out on a Bruker Reflex IV matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometer in the positive-ion reflector mode. Mono-isotopic peptide masses were assigned using the Bruker X-TOF software. Potential phosphorylation sites were searched using the FindMod tool (http://us.expasy.org/tools/findmod/) with the following parameters: PPAR A/B domains as user-entered sequences, V8 or Asp-N digestion in phosphate buffer, two missed cleavages allowed, cysteines modified by carbamidomethylation, methionine oxidation, and a mass tolerance of 75 ppm.

Cell culture and transient transfection assays. HeLa and HD2 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM)-Ham F10 containing 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS) and 40 µg/ml gentamicin and plated to approximately 50% confluency (5 x 105 cells/35-mm plate) before transfection. Normal human fibroblasts (GM03348D; Coriell Cell Repository), XPD-mutated fibroblasts (XPJCLO) (44), TTD8PV, and TTD12PV (isolated from TTD patients bearing the R112H and R722 point mutations, respectively [reviewed in reference 6]) were grown in DMEM (1 g glucose/liter; GIBCO-BRL) supplemented with 10% FCS and 40 µg/ml gentamicin. TTD and WT mouse fibroblasts were grown in DMEM (4.5 g glucose/liter; GIBCO-BRL) and supplemented with 15% FCS and 40 µg/ml gentamicin. Human and mouse fibroblasts were transiently transfected using the transfection reagent Fugene6 (Roche Diagnostics). In all experiments, 1 µg of pPPAR-RE-Luc and 100 ng of each expression vector were used per well in the absence of serum. Control transfections were undertaken with corresponding void plasmids. To normalize transfection efficiencies, pCH110 (1 µg) was cotransfected. Following transfection for 7 h, the cells were treated with red phenol-free medium containing 10% charcoal-treated FCS-40 µg/ml gentamicin. After 12 h of incubation, the appropriate ligand for each PPAR isotype was added and the mixture was incubated for 24 h. Fibroblasts extracts were analyzed for luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities as previously described (25). The results are the mean of at least three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis. The number of mice for each group used in experiments is indicated in the figure legends. Values are presented as the mean ± the standard error of the mean. A two-tailed Student test was used to calculate P values.


   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
TTD mice exhibit hypoplasia of the adipose tissues. TTD mice bearing the XPD point mutation R722W were used in our study. These mice develop features similar to those observed in XP-D patients, such as brittle hair, developmental defects, skeletal abnormalities, and cachexia (Fig. 1A; reviewed in reference 10). Indeed, weight differences between WT and TTD mice appear and become more pronounced a few months after birth (TTD mice have about 20% lower body weights at 3 months of age; Fig. 1B). The weight loss is not due to disruption of the daily food intake (3.8 ± 0.2 and 4.2 ± 0.2 g/animal/day for WT and TTD mice, respectively). The appearance and fat composition of the feces of TTD mice are normal (data not shown), arguing against malabsorption as the cause of weight loss.



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Lean phenotype in TTD mice. (A) Photographs of representative 3-month-old XPD+/+, XPDR722W/R722W, and XPD+/R722W mice. (B) Body weights of male WT (n = 6) and TTD (n = 6) mice were monitored for 18 months. (C) Weights of the liver (Liv), intraperitoneal WAT, and interscapular BAT were normalized to body weight for 3- and 6-month-old male TTD mice (n = 6). The values are percentages relative to those observed for WT mice.

 
The weights of various tissues were then analyzed at different ages (Fig. 1C). Whereas the TTD liver exhibits a weight similar to the WT, we observed a progressive mass reduction for the perivisceral WAT (48% and 32% of that observed in 3- and 6-month-old WT mice, respectively; Fig. 1C and 2A, parts 1 and 2, arrows) and the interscapular BAT (67% and 52% of that observed in 3- and 6-month-old WT mice, respectively; Fig. 1C). Interestingly, the perivisceral WAT and the interscapular BAT are almost nonexistent in 18-month-old TTD mice (Fig. 2A). Histological analysis after standard H&E staining revealed that the adipocytes in the intraperitoneal WAT of 3-month-old TTD mice are reduced and heterogeneous in size, whereas they are homogeneous and uniform in the WAT of control littermates (Fig. 2B, parts 1 and 2). In parallel, oil red-O staining of TTD BAT cells reveals a decrease in the accumulation of lipid droplets (Fig. 2B, parts 5 and 6), which explains the decrease in the intracytoplasmic vacuoles observed in the H&E staining (parts 3 and 4). Similar histological observations were found in TTD mice at different ages (data not shown).



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Expression of PPAR{gamma} target genes in TTD adipose tissues. (A) Ventral view of 3-, 6-, and 18-month-old WT (parts 1, 3, and 5) and TTD (parts 2, 4, and 6) mice. Note the progressive loss of visceral fat pads in TTD mice (arrows). (B) H&E-stained sections of intraperitoneal WAT and interscapular BAT of 3-month-old WT and TTD mice. BAT was also stained with lipid-specific oil red-O dye. Magnification is indicated at the bottom left of each part. (C) Gene expression in WAT and BAT of 3-month-old WT (dark boxes, n = 4) and TTD (open boxes, n = 4) mice on standard chow (–) or supplemented with rosiglitazone, a specific PPAR{gamma} ligand (+ Rosi; 10 mg/kg body weight for 3 days). The values were normalized relative to 18S RNA expression. The full names of the genes are given in the text. The recruitment of PPAR{gamma} and RNA pol II on the corresponding promoters was also analyzed by ChIP assays in WT (dark boxes) and TTD (open boxes) adipose tissues. Immunoprecipitated DNA was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. Results are expressed as n-fold recruitment relative to nontreated WT mice.

 
Dysregulation of PPAR{gamma}-responsive genes in the adipose tissues. We were wondering whether the morphological alterations of the TTD mouse adipose tissues could be associated with dysregulation of some genes. Knowing that PPARs play a preponderant role in these tissues (46, 48), we analyzed the expression of genes known to be controlled by PPARs and/or involved in various pathways of lipid metabolism (Fig. 2C).

WT and TTD mice were thus treated by gavage with rosiglitazone (10 mg/kg body weight for 3 days), a specific ligand of PPAR{gamma} (30). In WT BAT, the rosiglitazone ligand stimulated the expression of UCP-1 and -3 (uncoupling proteins 1 and 3, involved in the uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation), mCPT1 (the muscle form of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1, involved in fatty acid ß-oxidation), and aP2 (a fatty acid binding protein) (Fig. 2C). More importantly, we observed that the induction of these genes was 50% lower in TTD BAT than in WT BAT. A similar reduction was observed by transfection assays in XPD-deficient cells (see Fig. 5B and C). We also found in TTD WAT an unexpected ligand-independent overexpression of UCP-1 (10-fold), mCPT1 (3.5-fold) (two genes usually expressed in BAT), and aP2 (4.5-fold). Note that PGC1{alpha}, a coactivator that regulates the expression of genes involved in biological programs linked to energy homeostasis (such as thermal regulation), is also overexpressed in both TTD BAT and WAT (about twofold). Finally, under both standard and gavage conditions, no significant changes between WT and TTD mice were observed in the expression of some genes, such as PPAR{gamma}, PPAR{delta}, the very long chain acyl coenzyme A (CoA) synthetase (involved in fatty acid ß-oxidation), UCP-2, the lipoprotein lipase (involved in triglyceride hydrolysis), Spot 14 (involved in lipogenesis), and the acyl-CoA binding protein (involved in fatty acid trafficking) (Fig. 2C and data not shown).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. Phosphorylation of PPARs is crucial for their transactivation. (A) Left part: Western blotting analysis of PPAR{gamma}1 and -2 (Ab PPAR{gamma}) and their phosphorylated status on serines 84 and 112 (Ab PPAR{gamma}-P) in WAT (10 µg, lanes 1 and 2) and BAT (25 µg, lanes 3 and 4) nuclear extracts from 3-month-old WT and TTD mice. TBP (Ab TBP) was used as an internal control. Middle part: detection of PPAR{gamma}2 (PPAR{gamma}), its phosphorylated status on serine 112 (Ab PPAR-P) and XPD (Ab XPD) in crude extracts (100 µg) from HeLa and HD2 (bearing XPD point mutation R683W) cells overexpressing PPAR{gamma}2 (lanes 1 to 4) and WT XPD (+ XPD, lanes 3 and 4). TBP (Ab TBP) was used as an internal control. Right part: detection of PPAR{alpha} (Ab PPAR{alpha}), phosphorylated S12 PPAR{alpha} (Ab PPAR{alpha}/S12), and TBP (Ab TBP) in hepatic nuclear extracts (25 µg) from 3-month-old WT and TTD mice. (B) WT (dark boxes) and TTD (open boxes) mouse fibroblasts were cotransfected with pPPAR-RE-Luc (1 µg), pCH110 (1 µg), and either PPAR{gamma}1-wt, PPAR{gamma}2-wt, PPAR{gamma}1S84A, PPAR{gamma}1S84E, PPAR{gamma}2S112A, PPAR{gamma}2S112E, pSG5-PPAR{alpha}-wt, PPAR{alpha} S12A/S21A, or PPAR{alpha}S12E/S21E(100 ng). The cells were next treated with a specific ligand for PPAR{gamma}1/2 (rosiglitazone, 0.5 µM) or PPAR{alpha} (WY14643, 1 µM). Luciferase (Luc) activity was measured 24 h later and normalized relative to ß-galactosidase activity. Note that the ß-galactosidase values were similar in WT and TTD fibroblasts. (C) HeLa (dark boxes) and HD2 (open boxes) cells were transfected with pPPAR-RE-Luc (1 µg), pCH110 (1 µg), pSG5-PPAR{gamma}1 (100 ng), pSG5-PPAR{gamma}2 (100 ng), pSG5-PPAR{alpha} (100 ng), and either pcDNA-XPDwt (XPDwt) or empty pcDNA. Cells were then treated with the corresponding ligand, as mentioned for panel B. The values are presented as percentages, 100% being the level of transactivation obtained in HeLa cells overexpressing each PPAR isotype in the presence of the corresponding ligand. Rosi, rosiglitazone.

 
To understand whether such dysregulations are due to PPAR{gamma}, we set up ChIP assays. The genomic DNA fragments bound to either PPAR{gamma} or RNA pol II were immunoprecipitated with the corresponding antibodies and further analyzed by quantitative PCR. Upon rosiglitazone treatment, PPAR{gamma} was much less recruited on the promoters of UCP-1, UCP-3, mCPT1, and aP2 in TTD BAT (Fig. 2C). Therefore, it is not surprising that the occupancy on the respective promoters by RNA pol II parallels that of PPAR{gamma}, thus explaining the lower RNA synthesis level. In the case of the abnormal overexpression of aP2 in TTD WAT, we found that mRNA synthesis perfectly parallels RNA pol II recruitment whereas PPAR{gamma} is no longer recruited (Fig. 2C). We next hardly detected PPAR{gamma} recruitment on the promoters of UCP-1 and mCPT1 (masked in the background; data not shown).

Altogether, our data underline a profound dysregulation of PPAR{gamma}-dependent genes in TTD adipose tissues. Whereas the basal dysregulation observed for some of these genes might occur in a PPAR{gamma} (and ligand)-independent manner, the lower response of genes to a specific PPAR{gamma} treatment is associated with lower PPAR{gamma} recruitment and consequently of the transcription apparatus on their promoters.

Dysregulation of PPAR{alpha}-responsive genes in the livers of TTD mice. We next evaluated whether the transactivity of another PPAR isotype is affected in TTD mice. We focused our attention on PPAR{alpha}, the major PPAR isotype in the liver (35). Macroscopic analysis first showed that the livers of 3-, 6-, and 12-month-old TTD mice look normal, with a size, a form, a consistency, and a color similar to the WT (as illustrated for 3-month-old mice in Fig. 3A, parts 1 and 2). Histological analysis further reveals that there is no significant difference in the architecture and structure of the hepatic parenchyma between WT and TTD mice at various ages (parts 3 to 6). A slight reduction of the intrahepatic lipid vacuoles is still observed in TTD mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 3A, parts 7 and 8). It is worth noting that we observed minimal necrotic lesions in the vicinity of the centrolobular and periportal areas of TTD mouse livers, which are associated with granular degeneration of hepatocytes having no or pyknotic nuclei (parts 4 and 6, arrows). Despite their persistence, no age-related accumulation of these necrotic areas was observed in TTD mice. The presence of apoptosis in the 3-month-old TTD liver was assessed by the TUNEL method (Fig. 3, parts 9 and 10). We observed a very slight (5%) increase in apoptosis in the livers of TTD mice compared to their control littermates. More importantly, the apoptotic areas were not colocalized to the necrotic areas. Immunodetection of the cell proliferation marker Ki67 revealed a slight increase in cell regeneration in the livers of WT mice compared to TTD mice (9%, parts 11 and 12). Since neither necrosis accumulation nor other hepatic lesions have been observed, our results led us to suggest the aspecific and isolated status of these necroses.



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. Expression of PPAR{alpha} target genes in the TTD liver. (A) Macroscopic view (parts 1 and 2) of 3-month-old WT and TTD mouse livers. Parts 3 to 6: H&E-stained liver sections. Arrows indicate focal lesions corresponding to hepatic necrosis. Parts 7 and 8: oil red-O-dyed liver sections. Parts 9 and 10: in situ apoptosis detection in liver sections by TUNEL assay (see arrows). Parts 11 and 12: immunoperoxidase staining of liver sections for detection of the Ki67 antigen. Arrows indicate Ki67-positive nuclei. PV and CV, portal and centrolobular veins. Magnificationsare indicated. (B) Expression of PPAR{alpha} target genes in the livers of 3-month-old WT (black boxes, n = 4) and TTD (open boxes, n = 4) mice treated for 20 h with WY14643 (100 mg/kg body weight). The results are presented as n-fold induction relative to nontreated mice. ChIP analyses were also performed on the CD36 and CYP4A1 promoters in the liver of WT (dark boxes) and TTD (open boxes) mice. Soluble chromatin was immunoprecipitated with antibodies raised against PPAR{alpha}, RNA pol II, or TFIIH (XPB). Immunoprecipitated DNA was quantified by real-time quantitative PCR. Results are expressed as n-fold recruitment relative to nontreated mice.

 
Although macroscopic and histological analyses did not reveal strong alterations of the TTD liver, we next analyzed the expression of hepatic genes known to be regulated by PPAR{alpha}. Three-month-old WT and TTD mice were treated for 20 h with WY14643, a PPAR{alpha} agonist, in order to measure the induction of hepatic genes known to be highly and quickly activated by PPAR{alpha} (8). Under those conditions, the PPAR{alpha} mRNA level remained unchanged in both WT and TTD livers (Fig. 3B). We also noted that the cellular concentrations of PPAR{alpha} were similar in WT and TTD mice (see Fig. 5A, right part). Moreover, the expression of CD36 (encoding a glycoprotein involved in the uptake of long-chain fatty acids), the acyl-CoA oxidase (the rate-limiting enzyme in peroxisomal ß-oxidation of fatty acids), or the mitochondrial 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase (involved in ketogenesis) was similarly induced in WT and TTD mice (Fig. 3B and data not shown). On the contrary, pACOTH (peroxisomal acyl-CoA thioesterase, involved in the hydrolysis of acyl-CoAs) and CYP4A1 (cytochrome P450 4A1, involved in the {omega}-hydroxylation of fatty acids) are much less overexpressed in TTD mice (Fig. 3B). ChIP assays next revealed that PPAR{alpha} is much less recruited on the CYP4A1 promoter in TTD liver than in WT liver, while its recruitment on the CD36 promoter is similar in both livers (Fig. 3B). As expected, upon WY14643 treatment, we found that the recruitment of RNA pol II was much lower on the CYP4A1 promoter in TTD liver. Lastly, no significant difference was observed between WT and TTD mice in the recruitment of TFIIH on the promoters of the CD36 and CYP4A1 genes (Fig. 3B).

Altogether, these results demonstrate that TFIIH mutation inhibits the expression of some hepatic PPAR{alpha} target genes in response to a specific agonist. This defect is associated with a weaker recruitment of PPAR{alpha} and RNA pol II, two components essential for their transcription.

PPARs are phosphorylated by TFIIH via cdk7. Knowing that some nuclear receptors cooperate with TFIIH (7, 25, 38), we examined the physical and enzymatic connections between the PPAR nuclear receptors and basal transcription factor TFIIH. Extracts from Sf9 insect cells coinfected with baculoviruses encoding the subunits of TFIIH and either PPAR{gamma}2 or PPAR{alpha} were incubated with Ab-p44, a monoclonal antibody directed against the p44 subunit of TFIIH (20). Ab-p44 immunoprecipitates either PPAR{gamma}2 or PPAR{alpha} in addition to TFIIH (Fig. 4A, left and right parts, lanes 8), while it does not retain PPARs in the absence of TFIIH (lanes 6). The presence of a specific ligand does not affect the interaction between TFIIH and PPARs (data not shown). As a control, we observed that Ab-C, an unrelated antibody, does not immunoadsorb either of these components (lanes 9). As previously stated (12), no interaction has been observed between TFIIH and the vitamin D nuclear receptor (VDR), demonstrating the specificity of the PPAR-TFIIH interactions (Fig. 4A, middle part, lane 8). To further determine which TFIIH subunit is targeted by PPARs, Sf9 insect cell extracts coinfected with baculoviruses encoding PPAR{alpha} or PPAR{gamma}2 and either one of the subunits of TFIIH were incubated with the corresponding antibodies (Fig. 4B). Both PPAR{gamma}2 and PPAR{alpha} coimmunoprecipitated with XPB, p62, p44, and MAT1.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Interaction between TFIIH and PPARs and determination of their cdk7 phosphorylation sites. (A) Sf9 cells were coinfected with baculoviruses encoding the subunits of TFIIH (rIIH wt) and PPAR{gamma}2 (left part), VDR (middle part), or PPAR{alpha} (right part). Immunoprecipitation (IP) was done using an antibody directed against the TFIIH/p44 subunit (Ab-p44, lanes 5 to 8) or a control antibody (Ab-C, lanes 9). The bound proteins were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies against subunits of TFIIH (XPD, p62 and cdk7), PPAR{gamma}2, VDR, or PPAR{alpha}. (B) Sf9 cell extracts overexpressing each TFIIH subunit alone (–) or in combination with PPAR{gamma}2 or PPAR{alpha} (as indicated) were incubated with antibodies directed against the corresponding PPAR isotype. Immunoprecipitated proteins were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies against each subunit of TFIIH. The input lanes (IN) represent 10% of the total volume of extracts used in each immunoprecipitation. (C) Schematic representation of the truncated PPAR proteins with a histidine tag (dark box). The different domains (A to F) of PPAR{gamma}2 and PPAR{alpha} and the cdk7 phosphorylation sites are depicted. Serine 112 in PPAR{gamma}2 corresponds to serine 84 in the PPAR{gamma}1 isoform. (D) Purified PPAR, PPAR{Delta}A/B, and A/B PPAR were incubated in the absence (lanes 1, 4, 7, and 10) or presence of either free CAK (lanes 2, 5, and 8), TFIIH isolated from HeLa cells (lanes 3, 6, and 9), recombinant TFIIH (rIIH wt, lanes 11), or recombinant TFIIH mutated in the cdk7 ATP binding site (rIIH CKmut, lanes 12). Coomassie blue-stained gels (top parts) and autoradiography (Autoradio; bottom parts) of the incubated fractions are shown. (E) Left part: A/B PPAR{gamma}1-wt, A/B PPAR{gamma}2-wt, A/B PPAR{gamma}1 S84A, and A/B PPAR{gamma}2 S112A were incubated with CAK or TFIIH in the presence of 0.14 µM [{gamma}-32P]ATP. Right part: purified A/B PPAR{alpha}-wt, S12A, S21A, and S12A/S21A were incubated with CAK and increasing concentrations of [{gamma}-32P]ATP (0.07, 0.14, 0.42, and 0.70 µM).

 
We also investigated whether PPARs can be used as substrates by cdk7. In vitro kinase assays show that both CAK and TFIIH phosphorylate recombinant PPAR{gamma}2 and PPAR{alpha} (Fig. 4D, left and right parts, lanes 1 to 3) and more precisely their A/B domain (both parts, lanes 7 to 9). Indeed, PPAR {Delta}A/B, the truncated forms that lack the A/B domain, are not phosphorylated (both parts, lanes 4 to 6). Moreover, the A/B PPARs were not phosphorylated by rIIH-CKmut, a recombinant TFIIH in which cdk7 was mutated in its ATP binding site (both parts, lanes 10 to 12). The A/B PPAR motifs were next phosphorylated in vitro by CAK, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and digested for mass spectrometry analysis. Accordingly, and knowing that cdks are serine/threonine kinases, each serine or threonine contained in the putative phosphorylated regions of PPAR{gamma}2 and PPAR{alpha} was mutated to alanine. The mutated A/B proteins were produced in E. coli and further purified on a nickel chelate column before being tested in in vitro kinase assays. Having observed that some mutations of serine to alanine prevent phosphorylation by either CAK or the entire TFIIH, we demonstrate that residue S112 of PPAR{gamma}2 (corresponding to serine 84 of PPAR{gamma}1) is a target for cdk7 (Fig. 4E, left part, lanes 4 to 6 and 10 to 12). We also found that the A/B domain of PPAR{alpha} contains two phosphorylation sites at positions S12 and S21 (Fig. 4E, right part). Indeed, A/B PPAR{alpha}-S12A/S21A, in which serines 12 and 21 were changed to alanine, is no longer phosphorylated by TFIIH (Fig. 4E, right part, lanes 13 to 16), whereas A/B PPAR{alpha}-S12A or A/B PPAR{alpha}-S21A is less phosphorylated (lanes 5 to 12), suggesting a synergistic effect of the phosphorylation of both serines 12 and 21. Additionally, preliminary mass spectral data strongly suggest that the PPAR{delta} A/B domain is phosphorylated by cdk7 between residues 44 and 55 (DLSQNSSPSSLL; data not shown).

Phosphorylation of PPARs is crucial for their transactivation. We next questioned whether a default in the phosphorylation of PPARs might explain their lower ability to transactivate their target genes in XPD-mutated cells. Nuclear extracts of WAT, BAT, and liver isolated from 3-month-old WT and TTD mice were resolved by SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 5A). We found that the cellular concentrations of PPAR{gamma}1/2 and PPAR{alpha} are similar in both WT and TTD mice (left and right parts). Nevertheless, using an antibody specifically designed for either phosphorylated S84/S112 of PPAR{gamma}1/2 (Ab PPAR{gamma}-P) or phosphorylated S12 of PPAR{alpha} (Ab PPAR{alpha}/S12), we observed that PPAR{gamma}1/2 and PPAR{alpha} are significantly less phosphorylated in the adipose tissues and liver isolated from TTD mice.

We next designed PPAR expression vectors in which the serine residues phosphorylated by cdk7 were changed to either alanine or glutamic acid, which mimics a constitutively phosphorylated serine residue. Wild-type and TTD mouse fibroblasts were cotransfected with these expression vectors in association with pPPAR-RE-Luc (Fig. 5B). First, we observed that luciferase gene expression was stimulated in WT fibroblasts by PPAR{gamma}1 (3.3-fold), PPAR{gamma}2 (4.8-fold), and PPAR{alpha} (4.4-fold) following the addition of their corresponding ligands (Fig. 5B, each part, lanes 3 and 4, dark boxes). In contrast, the transactivation directed by PPAR{gamma}1, PPAR{gamma}2, or PPAR{alpha} was approximately 50% lower in TTD fibroblasts than in WT cells (lanes 3 and 4, open boxes). Control experiments showed that reporter gene activation requires both PPAR overexpression and the presence of the ligand (lanes 1 to 3). Interestingly, the transfection of PPAR{gamma}1-S84E, PPAR{gamma}2-S112E, and PPAR{alpha}-S12E/S21E expression vectors circumvents the transactivation defect observed in TTD fibroblasts (Fig. 5B, compare lane 6 to lane 4, open boxes). Moreover, the overexpression in WT fibroblasts of PPAR{gamma}1-S84A, PPAR{gamma}2-S112A, and PPAR{alpha}-S12A/S21A gives reduced luciferase activity similar to what is usually obtained in TTD cells (compare lane 5 to lane 4, dark boxes).

Finally, we investigated in XPD-mutated cells whether WT XPD would restore the transactivation by PPARs (Fig. 5C) and secondly whether this effect would be correlated with their phosphorylation status (Fig. 5A, middle part). For convenience, we used the established cell line HD2 (22), resulting from the fusion between human fibroblasts harboring the XPD point mutation R683W (an other XPD mutation affecting transactivation by PPARs; see below) and HeLa cells. HD2 and HeLa cells (used as a control) were cotransfected with pPPAR-RE-Luc (a construct containing the luciferase reporter gene placed under the control of three DR1-type PPAR-responsive elements) and expression vectors encoding WT XPD and either PPAR{alpha} or PPAR{gamma}2 (Fig. 5C). Upon addition of the corresponding ligand, the transactivation directed by any PPAR was approximately 50% lower in HD2 than in HeLa cells, as previously observed for PPAR target genes in TTD mice (Fig. 5C, each part, lanes 1, open boxes). Interestingly, overexpression of WT XPD fully restores transactivation by PPAR{gamma}1, PPAR{gamma}2, and PPAR{alpha} in HD2 cells (both parts, lanes 2, open boxes). These results clearly demonstrate that the defect in transactivation by PPARs in XPD-deficient cells is due to the XPD mutation itself. In parallel, the phosphorylation status of PPAR{gamma}2 was evaluated by Western blotting in HD2 cells. WT and HD2 cells were transfected with expression vectors encoding WT XPD and PPAR{gamma}2 (Fig. 5A, middle part). Whereas PPAR{gamma}2 is significantly less phosphorylated in HD2 cells than in HeLa cells (compare lanes 1 and 2), WT XPD overexpression restores the phosphorylation status of PPAR{gamma}2 in XPD-mutated cells (compare lanes 2 and 4).

Altogether, these results demonstrate unambiguously that an XPD C-terminal mutation affects the phosphorylation of PPARs and consequently their transactivation efficiency.

Other XPD mutations affect transactivation by PPARs. We then examined whether different XPD mutations alter transactivation by PPARs. TTD8PV (R112H), XPJCLO (R683W), and TTD12PV (R722W) human primary fibroblasts isolated from XP or TTD patients (44) (http://www.xpmutations.org/) and normal human fibroblasts (GM03348D) were transfected with pPPAR-RE-Luc and the expression vector pSG5 PPAR{alpha}, pSG5 PPAR{gamma}1, or pSG5 PPAR{gamma}2-wt (Table 1). In the presence of ligand, we observed that luciferase gene expression was reduced in cells bearing XPD C-terminal mutations R683W and R722W, while it was normal in TTD8PV cells harboring the N-terminal mutation R112H. These results demonstrate that transactivation by PPARs is altered in fibroblasts from XP or TTD patients and suggest that this deficiency is associated with the position of the XPD mutation rather than with the nature of the disorder.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Transactivation by PPARs in XPD-deficient human fibroblastsa

 

   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
This work is part of a study aiming to better understand the involvement of TFIIH in the transactivation process. We analyzed how a mutation in its XPD subunit affects this process, which in fine might explain the emergence of some clinical features observed in XP-D patients. We thus found that the adipose tissues and livers of TTD mice (bearing the XPD R722W mutation) have a defect in the regulation of their PPAR-responsive genes. We demonstrate that lower PPAR phosphorylation by the cdk7 kinase of TFIIH contributes to the dysregulation of these genes.

PPAR phosphorylation by cdk7. Our results demonstrate that the activity of PPAR nuclear receptors depends on their ability to be phosphorylated by the DNA repair-transcription factor TFIIH. Mass spectral analysis and mutagenesis show that the phosphorylation sites are located in their A/B domain, also called the AF1 domain, in a serine/proline consensus site, namely, at positions S12 and S21 for PPAR{alpha} and S84 and S112 for PPAR{gamma}1 and -2, respectively. Interestingly, the sites of PPAR phosphorylation by the cdk7 kinase are also targeted by the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases (19, 23). This observation is not restricted to PPARs, since other nuclear receptors are also phosphorylated on the same residue by cdk7 and/or MAP kinases, such as retinoic acid receptor {alpha} (38) and estrogen receptor {alpha} (7, 24). How do we reconcile that the same residue could be phosphorylated by different kinases? MAP kinases and cdk7 are involved in different signaling pathways, and their actions might occur at different times in cellular life. Whereas PPARs (and in extenso other nuclear receptors) would be phosphorylated in response to some mitogenic signal that activates the MAP kinase pathway, their phosphorylation by cdk7 would occur together with the formation of the transactivation complex that puts TFIIH (within the preinitiation complex) and PPARs in very close proximity. Consequently, the same phosphorylation performed by various kinases differently affects the activity of the target factor. Along this line, it was demonstrated that serine 5 from the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA pol II could be phosphorylated by both cdk7 and cdk8 kinases with adverse consequences for the transcription process. While phosphorylation by cdk8 (which occurs outside the preinitiation complex) prevents the recruitment of RNA pol II on the promoter, modification of serine 5 by cdk7 (which occurs inside the preinitiation complex) promotes initiation of transcription by facilitating promoter escape (2, 17, 36).

Interestingly, PPAR nuclear receptors are much less phosphorylated by cdk7 in cells bearing an XPD C-terminal mutation, as shown in cells isolated from XP-D R683W patients, as well as in tissues of TTD R722W mice. In these cells, the PPAR underphosphorylation is due to the XPD mutation itself, since overexpression of WT XPD restores PPAR phosphorylation to the normal level. How can one explain that any mutation in the C-terminal end of XPD affects PPAR phosphorylation? XPD C-terminal mutations weaken the interaction between XPD and the p44 subunit, and consequently the anchoring of the CAK to the core-TFIIH (9). This might explain why these mutations not only prevent the regulation of the XPD helicase by p44 to allow elimination of DNA damage (13) but also the ability of cdk7 to phosphorylate the nuclear receptors, such as PPARs.

Incidence of PPAR underphosphorylation. In the adipose tissues and livers of TTD mice, the XPD mutation R722W affects the phosphorylation of PPAR{gamma}1/2 and PPAR{alpha} and consequently the expression of PPAR target genes.

In some cases, the transactivation by underphosphorylated PPARs is maintained after treatment with a specific ligand, although the PPAR-responsive genes are induced to a much lower level than in the WT ones, as shown for aP2 (in WAT), UCP-1, UCP-3 and mCPT1 (in BAT), and CYP4A1 and pACOTH (in the liver) (Fig. 2C and 3B). Additional ChIP experiments clearly demonstrate that the slight induction of these genes in TTD tissues is consistent with the lower recruitment of PPARs, as well as RNA pol II, on their promoters. Their expression defect is not due to a dysfunction of TFIIH in the basal transcription process, since (i) TFIIH is normally recruited on their promoters and (ii) a TFIIH complex that carries an XPD C-terminal end mutation is able to normally promote RNA synthesis in in vitro transcription assays (9, 25). The expression defect (that was also observed in our transient-transfection assays) is rather due to the inability of TFIIH to accurately phosphorylate PPAR{gamma} or PPAR{alpha}. Indeed, overexpression of WT XPD restores not only transactivation by PPARs but also their phosphorylation in XPD-mutated cells (Fig. 5A, middle part, and C). Moreover, overexpression of the PPAR S-to-E-mutated forms (in which the glutamic acid mimics a constitutively phosphorylated residue) allows normal expression of PPAR-dependent genes even in XPD-mutated cells (Fig. 5B). It remains to be determined whether lower phosphorylation prevents the recruitment of accurate cofactors which are required for the PPAR transactivation process.

In other cases, the expression of PPAR target genes is unexpectedly increased in a tissue-specific manner, as observed for UCP-1, mCPT1, and aP2 in TTD WAT. Since such overexpression occurs independently of the presence of a specific ligand, it is not surprising that PPARs are no longer recruited on their corresponding promoters, while the recruitment of RNA pol II is consistent with the expression level (as illustrated for aP2 in Fig. 2C). Knowing that the expression of any gene requires a subtle combination of several DNA binding factors (14), a defect in the function of one of them might completely reprogram the transcription process. Since PPARs cannot be correctly phosphorylated, one cannot exclude the possibility that their transactivation function is diminished to a such level that they are supplanted by other tissue-specific factors. Further investigations should be undertaken to understand why underphosphorylated PPARs are no longer recruited, giving rise to other regulatory pathways. Altogether, our results show that PPAR target genes are specifically affected by PPAR underphosphorylation in a tissue specific manner. This differential effect can thus explain the apparent discrepancies between our results and data showing that the S112A mutation in PPAR{gamma}2 increases the expression of responsive genes (1, 19). In the latter case, it is likely that the nonphosphorylated PPAR S112A might be either assisted or supplanted by another transcriptional factor.

Contribution of PPAR defects to the TTD phenotype. The reduction of adipose mass in TTD mice may occur by a disruption of adipogenesis and/or elevated energy dissipation. Defects in adipogenesis typically result in irregular metabolic features, such as fatty liver, hypertriglyceridemia, and insulin resistance (34, 43). However, in TTD mice, no apparent abnormal fat accumulation was observed in the liver, and the circulating glucose and total triglyceride levels are normal (data not shown). Subtle adipogenic defects cannot be excluded, since the adipose tissues disappear with age (Fig. 2A) and TTD mouse embryonic fibroblasts have a reduced capability to differentiate into adipocytes in the presence of prostaglandin PGJ2, a PPAR{gamma} ligand known to induce adipocyte differentiation (data not shown). Besides adipogenic dysfunction, we also observed in TTD mice elevated energy dissipation by indirect calorimetric analysis (1.4 ± 0.06 and 1.6 ± 0.07 kcal/h in WT and TTD mice, respectively; P < 0.05; data not shown), as well as the aberrant overexpression in TTD WAT of BAT-specific genes involved in fatty acid catabolism, such as PGC1{alpha} and UCP-1 (33, 42). The overexpression of these genes could contribute to the higher energy expenditure in TTD mice, as previously found in transgenic mice overexpressing UCP-1 in WAT (27).

Therefore, the hypoplasia of the adipose tissues observed within the TTD mice might be due at least partially to a dysfunction of the PPAR nuclear receptors, which are essential in the lipid metabolism and both differentiation (46) and in vivo survival of the adipocytes (16). However, it seems also clear that the overall pleiotropic nature of the XP-D phenotype might result from the defect of various transcriptional factors, such as other nuclear receptors (12, 25). By using diverse treatments, XPD-deficient mice could provide excellent models to elucidate the contribution of a defect of different nuclear receptors, such as the estrogen receptor or the thyroid receptor, in various physiological pathways.

Our in vivo results underline the crucial role of phosphorylation by TFIIH for the transactivation process. Moreover, we demonstrate that a defect in phosphorylating nuclear receptors might simply result in a drop in their transactivation capacity that could (as a function of the tissue and the environmental situation) lead to their being opportunistically replaced by other factors. The major challenge for the future will be to understand how phosphorylation by TFIIH directs the integration of nuclear receptors in the transactivation complex.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank P. Brousset (CHU Purpan, INSERM U563, Toulouse, France), M. Doffoel (Clinique Med B, Hospices Civils de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France), and M. P. Chenard (Service d'anatomo-pathologie, Hôpital Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France) for fruitful discussions and P. Laine for critical reading of the manuscript. We are grateful to I. Kolb-Cheynel and J. L. Weickert for the design and production of recombinant baculoviruses; M. Argentini for mass spectral analysis; M. C. Antal, M. Duval, and M. Selloum for expertise in phenotyping mice; and J. Auwerx, P. Grimaldi, and M. Dauca for the pPPAR-RE-Luc, PSG5-rat PPAR{alpha}, pSG5-human PPAR{gamma}1 and -2, and pcDNA-mouse PPAR{delta} constructs.

These studies were supported by CNRS, INSERM, and grants from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, the European Community (QLG1-1999 and QLRT-1999-02002), the Research Ministry ACI Biologie Cellulaire et Structurale (3-2-535), the Institut des Maladies Rares (A03098MS), and the Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique. E.C. is a recipient of a grant from the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer. P.D. is the recipient of a fellowship from the Fondation Lefoulon-Delalande, and the 2000 Descartes Prize was awarded to J.-M.E. by the European Economic Community. C.L. is a recipient of a Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale fellowship.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: IGBMC, BP 10142, 67404 Illkirch Cedex, France. Phone: 33 (0)3 88 65 34 47. Fax: 33 (0)3 88 65 32 01. E-mail: egly{at}titus.u-strasbg.fr. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
1. Adams, M., M. J. Reginato, D. Shao, M. A. Lazar, and V. K. Chatterjee. 1997. Transcriptional activation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is inhibited by phosphorylation at a consensus mitogen-activated protein kinase site. J. Biol. Chem. 272:5128-5132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Akoulitchev, S., S. Chuikov, and D. Reinberg. 2000. TFIIH is negatively regulated by cdk8-containing mediator complexes. Nature 407:102-106.[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Auwerx, J. 1999. PPAR{gamma}, the ultimate thrifty gene. Diabetologia 42:1033-1049.[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Berger, J., and D. E. Moller. 2002. The mechanisms of action of PPARs. Annu. Rev. Med. 53:409-435.[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Bootsma, D., and J. H. J. Hoeijmakers. 1993. DNA repair. Engagement with transcription. Nature 363:114-115.[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Botta, E., T. Nardo, B. C. Broughton, S. Marinoni, A. R. Lehmann, and M. Stefanini. 1998. Analysis of mutations in the XPD gene in Italian patients with trichothiodystrophy: site of mutation correlates with repair deficiency, but gene dosage appears to determine clinical severity. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63:1036-1048.[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Chen, D., T. Riedl, E. Washbrook, P. E. Pace, R. C. Coombes, J. M. Egly, and S. Ali. 2000. Activation of estrogen receptor alpha by S118 phosphorylation involves a ligand-dependent interaction with TFIIH and participation of CDK7. Mol. Cell 6:127-137.[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Cherkaoui-Malki, M., K. Meyer, W. Q. Cao, N. Latruffe, A. V. Yeldandi, M. S. Rao, C. A. Bradfield, and J. K. Reddy. 2001. Identification of novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPAR{alpha}) target genes in mouse liver using cDNA microarray analysis. Gene. Expr. 9:291-304.[Medline]

9. Coin, F., J. C. Marinoni, C. Rodolfo, S. Fribourg, A. M. Pedrini, and J. M. Egly. 1998. Mutations in the XPD helicase gene result in XP and TTD phenotypes, preventing interaction between XPD and the p44 subunit of TFIIH. Nat. Genet. 20:184-188.[CrossRef][Medline]

10. de Boer, J., J. de Wit, H. van Steeg, R. J. Berg, H. Morreau, P. Visser, A. R. Lehmann, M. Duran, J. H. Hoeijmakers, and G. Weeda. 1998. A mouse model for the basal transcription/DNA repair syndrome trichothiodystrophy. Mol. Cell 1:981-990.[CrossRef][Medline]

11. Desvergne, B., and W. Wahli. 1999. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism. Endocr. Rev. 20:649-688.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Drane, P., E. Compe, P. Catez, P. Chymkowitch, and J. M. Egly. 2004. Selective regulation of vitamin D receptor-responsive genes by TFIIH. Mol. Cell 16:187-197.[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Dubaele, S., L. Proietti De Santis, R. Bienstock, A. Keriel, M. Stefanini, B. Van Houten, and J. Egly. 2003. Basal transcription defect discriminates between xeroderma pigmentosum and trichothiodystrophy in XPD patients. Mol. Cell 11:1635-1646.[CrossRef][Medline]

14. Grosschedl, R. 1995. Higher-order nucleoprotein complexes in transcription: analogies with site-specific recombination. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7:362-370.[CrossRef][Medline]

15. Happle, R., H. Traupe, H. Grobe, and G. Bonsmann. 1984. The Tay syndrome (congenital ichthyosis with trichothiodystrophy). Eur. J. Pediatr. 141:147-152.[CrossRef][Medline]

16. He, W., Y. Barak, A. Hevener, P. Olson, D. Liao, J. Le, M. Nelson, E. Ong, J. M. Olefsky, and R. M. Evans. 2003. Adipose-specific peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma knockout causes insulin resistance in fat and liver but not in muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:15712-15717.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Hengartner, C. J., V. E. Myer, S. M. Liao, C. J. Wilson, S. S. Koh, and R. A. Young. 1998. Temporal regulation of RNA polymerase II by Srb10 and Kin28 cyclin-dependent kinases. Mol. Cell 2:43-53.[CrossRef][Medline]

18. Holstege, F. C., P. C. van der Vliet, and H. T. Timmers. 1996. Opening of an RNA polymerase II promoter occurs in two distinct steps and requires the basal transcription factors IIE and IIH. EMBO J. 15:1666-1677.[Medline]

19. Hu, E., J. B. Kim, P. Sarraf, and B. M. Spiegelman. 1996. Inhibition of adipogenesis through MAP kinase-mediated phosphorylation of PPAR{gamma}. Science 274:2100-2103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Humbert, S., H. van Vuuren, Y. Lutz, J. H. J. Hoeijmakers, J. M. Egly, and V. Moncollin. 1994. p44 and p34 subunits of the BTF2/TFIIH transcription factor have homologies with SSL, a yeast protein involved in DNA repair. EMBO J. 13:2393-2398.[Medline]

21. Itin, P. H., and M. R. Pittelkow. 1990. Trichothiodystrophy: review of sulfur-deficient brittle hair syndromes and association with the ectodermal dysplasias. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 22:705-717.[Medline]

22. Johnson, R. T., S. Squires, G. C. Ellion, G. L. E. Koch, and A. J. Rainbow. 1985. Xeroderma pigmentosum D-HeLa hybrids with low and high ultraviolet sensitivity associated with normal and diminished DNA repair ability, respectively. J. Cell Sci. 76:115-133.[Abstract]

23. Juge-Aubry, C. E., E. Hammar, C. Siegrist-Kaiser, A. Pernin, A. Takeshita, W. W. Chin, A. G. Burger, and C. A. Meier. 1999. Regulation of the transcriptional activity of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha by phosphorylation of a ligand-independent trans-activating domain. J. Biol. Chem. 274:10505-10510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Kato, S., H. Endoh, Y. Masuhiro, T. Kitamoto, S. Uchiyama, H. Sasaki, S. Masushige, Y. Gotoh, E. Nishida, H. Kawashima, et al. 1995. Activation of the estrogen receptor through phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein kinase. Science 270:1491-1494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Keriel, A., A. Stary, A. Sarasin, C. Rochette-Egly, and J. M. Egly. 2002. XPD mutations prevent TFIIH-dependent transactivation by nuclear receptors and phosphorylation of RAR{alpha}. Cell 109:125-135.[CrossRef][Medline]

26. Kersten, S., B. Desvergne, and W. Wahli. 2000. Roles of PPARs in health and disease. Nature 405:421-424.[CrossRef][Medline]

27. Kopecky, J., Z. Hodny, M. Rossmeisl, I. Syrovy, and L. P. Kozak. 1996. Reduction of dietary obesity in aP2-Ucp transgenic mice: physiology and adipose tissue distribution. Am. J. Physiol. 270:E768-E775.

28. Lee, C. H., P. Olson, and R. M. Evans. 2003. Minireview: lipid metabolism, metabolic diseases, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Endocrinology 144:2201-2207.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Lehmann, A. R. 2001. The xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD) gene: one gene, two functions, three diseases. Genes Dev. 15:15-23.[Free Full Text]

30. Lehmann, J. M., L. B. Moore, T. A. Smith-Oliver, W. O. Wilkison, T. M. Willson, and S. A. Kliewer. 1995. An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR{gamma}). J. Biol. Chem. 270:12953-12956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Lemon, B. D., J. D. Fondell, and L. P. Freedman. 1997. Retinoid X receptor:vitamin D3 receptor heterodimers promote stable preinitiation complex formation and direct 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-dependent cell-free transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:1923-1937.[Abstract]

32. Lu, H., L. Zawel, L. Fisher, J. M. Egly, and D. Reinberg. 1992. Human general transcription factor IIH phosphorylates the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II. Nature 358:641-645.[CrossRef][Medline]

33. Mascaro, C., E. Acosta, J. A. Ortiz, P. F. Marrero, F. G. Hegardt, and D. Haro. 1998. Control of human muscle-type carnitine palmitoyltransferase I gene transcription by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 273:8560-8563.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Moitra, J., M. M. Mason, M. Olive, D. Krylov, O. Gavrilova, B. Marcus-Samuels, L. Feigenbaum, E. Lee, T. Aoyama, M. Eckhaus, M. L. Reitman, and C. Vinson. 1998. Life without white fat: a transgenic mouse. Genes Dev. 12:3168-3181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Reddy, J. K., and T. Hashimoto. 2001. Peroxisomal beta-oxidation and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha: an adaptive metabolic system. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 21:193-230.[CrossRef][Medline]

36. Rickert, P., J. L. Corden, and E. Lees. 1999. Cyclin C/CDK8 and cyclin H/CDK7/p36 are biochemically distinct CTD kinases. Oncogene 18:1093-1102.[CrossRef][Medline]

37. Riedl, T., F. Hanaoka, and J. Egly. 2003. The comings and goings of nucleotide excision repair factors on damaged DNA. EMBO J. 22:5293-5303.[CrossRef][Medline]

38. Rochette-Egly, C., S. Adam, M. Rossignol, J. M. Egly, and P. Chambon. 1997. Stimulation of RAR{alpha} activation function AF-1 through binding to the general transcription factor TFIIH and phosphorylation by CDK7. Cell 90:97-107.[CrossRef][Medline]

39. Rosen, E. D., P. Sarraf, A. E. Troy, G. Bradwin, K. Moore, D. S. Milstone, B. M. Spiegelman, and R. M. Mortensen. 1999. PPAR{gamma} is required for the differentiation of adipose tissue in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Cell 4:611-617.[CrossRef][Medline]

40. Roy, R., J. P. Adamczewski, T. Seroz, W. Vermeulen, J. P. Tassan, L. Schaeffer, J. H. J. Hoeijmakers, and J. M. Egly. 1994. The MO15 cell cycle kinase is associated with the TFIIH transcription-DNA repair factor. Cell 79:1093-1101.[CrossRef][Medline]

41. Sandrock, B., and J. M. Egly. 2001. A yeast four-hybrid system identifies Cdk-activating kinase as a regulator of the XPD helicase, a subunit of transcription factor IIH. J. Biol. Chem. 276:35328-35333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Sears, I. B., M. A. MacGinnitie, L. G. Kovacs, and R. A. Graves. 1996. Differentiation-dependent expression of the brown adipocyte uncoupling protein gene: regulation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:3410-3419.[Abstract]

43. Shimomura, I., R. E. Hammer, J. A. Richardson, S. Ikemoto, Y. Bashmakov, J. L. Goldstein, and M. S. Brown. 1998. Insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in transgenic mice expressing nuclear SREBP-1c in adipose tissue: model for congenital generalized lipodystrophy. Genes Dev. 12:3182-3194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Taylor, E. M., B. C. Broughton, E. Botta, M. Stefanini, A. Sarasin, N. G. Jaspers, H. Fawcett, S. A. Harcourt, C. F. Arlett, and A. R. Lehmann. 1997. Xeroderma pigmentosum and trichothiodystrophy are associated with different mutations in the XPD (ERCC2) repair/transcription gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8658-8663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Tirode, F., D. Busso, F. Coin, and J. M. Egly. 1999. Reconstitution of the transcription factor TFIIH: assignment of functions for the three enzymatic subunits, XPB, XPD, and cdk7. Mol. Cell 3:87-95.[CrossRef][Medline]

46. Tontonoz, P., E. Hu, and B. M. Spiegelman. 1994. Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR{gamma}2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell 79:1147-1156.[CrossRef][Medline]

47. van Steeg, H., and K. H. Kraemer. 1999. Xeroderma pigmentosum and the role of UV-induced DNA damage in skin cancer. Mol. Med. Today 5:86-94.[CrossRef][Medline]

48. Wang, Y. X., C. H. Lee, S. Tiep, R. T. Yu, J. Ham, H. Kang, and R. M. Evans. 2003. Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor delta activates fat metabolism to prevent obesity. Cell 113:159-170.[CrossRef][Medline]

49. Zurita, M., and C. Merino. 2003. The transcriptional complexity of the TFIIH complex. Trends Genet. 19:578-584.[CrossRef][Medline]

Molecular and Cellular Biology, July 2005, p. 6065-6076, Vol. 25, No. 14
0270-7306/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/MCB.25.14.6065-6076.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


<
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services