Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2005, p. 7260-7269, Vol. 25, No. 16
0270-7306/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.25.16.7260-7269.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine,1 Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 631102
Received 15 December 2004/ Returned for modification 24 February 2005/ Accepted 17 May 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies using recombinant protein and cell extracts have demonstrated that, while necessary for RNA editing, apobec-1 alone is insufficient (23, 26). The requisite importance of apobec-1 was unequivocally revealed through targeted deletion of apobec1, which completely eliminated in vivo C-to-U editing of the murine apoB transcript, demonstrating that apobec-1 is an essential and nonredundant component of the holoenzyme (20, 21). Nevertheless, while essential for C-to-U RNA editing, apobec-1 alone is insufficient. In vitro studies using recombinant apobec-1 and ACF have demonstrated that an optimal stoichiometry exists between these two proteins, each of which interacts with one another and with the apoB RNA, notably at a stretch of AU-rich residues flanking the targeted cytidine. Recent work has identified the major functional domains (including three canonical RNA recognition motifs) within ACF that mediate both protein-protein and protein-RNA interaction and that both facilitate and constrain C-to-U RNA editing of the nuclear apoB transcript (5, 17). In addition, ACF contains a novel nuclear localization sequence that directs the importation of heterologous proteins (6). However, while these findings illustrate the range of biochemical mechanisms underlying the role of ACF in apoB RNA editing in vitro, there is little information concerning the requirement for ACF in in vivo RNA editing or the range of alternative or complementary targets, either protein or RNA or both.
In the current study, we have undertaken the targeted deletion of the murine acf gene in order to establish the requirement for ACF in C-to-U editing of apoB RNA. Our results from this characterization suggest that ACF has a wider range of targets than apoB RNA alone.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genotyping analysis. The genotype of ES cells was determined by Southern blotting. Genomic DNA was digested with XbaI, resolved on a 0.8% agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with a 32P-labeled 793-nucleotide (nt) probe corresponding to the sequence downstream of the 3' arm. Over 140 clones were analyzed for the homologous recombination event. A single positive clone was identified in which a 6.2-kb band was detected in addition to the 8-kb wild-type band. Targeted clones were expanded in culture, and 200 blastocysts were injected into pseudopregnant recipient C57BL/6 mice. A total of three chimeras were obtained, from which two mice were selected for breeding to establish germ line transmission of the targeted allele. The acf genotypes were determined by PCR with two different sets of three primers (see Fig. 2A). Set 1 included the following: a sense primer (Sse1), FSPmBAC (5'-CTGAACTGGGAATGAGTGGACATG-3'), was designed from intron 1 to amplify the wild-type and targeted alleles; an antisense primer (ASse1a), mACF Ex2 (5'-CCCCGGATTTGTGATTTGATT-3'), based on exon 2, will amplify a 338-bp band; and a third primer (ASse1b), GFP90AS (5'-CACGCTGAACTTGTGGCCGTTTAC3'), corresponding to the GFP sequence, will amplify the targeted allele, producing a 408-bp band. Set 2 included the following: the sense primer (Sse2a), FwdEx2 (5'-ATGGAATCAAATCACAAATCCGGGGATGG-3'), designed from the exon 2, amplifies the wild-type allele producing a 610-bp band; the antisense primer (ASse2), DwnEx2 (5'-CTTTCAAAGGTCTAACATGGGCAGAAGTTG-3'), will amplify both wild-type and targeted alleles; and the third primer (Sse2b), PGK (5'-AGGTGGCGCGAAGGGGCCACCAAAGAACGG-3'), corresponding to the PGK sequence of the Neo cassette, will amplify the targeted allele generating a 230-bp product. acf+/ mice were mated and monitored daily for plugs. Embryos at the indicated timed intervals (days postcoitum [dpc]) were recovered by microdissection for histological analysis or genomic DNA extraction with a Puregene DNA purification kit (Gentra Systems) and genotyping as described above.
|
-32P]dCTP (3,000 Ci/mmol, 3 µCi/reaction, NEN) as previously described (14). The primers were VBACF17 (5'-CAGCAATTCCCAGTCTTCATTTCC-3') and VBACF18 (5'-CCCAGGTAAAATGTCATAGAGTTTG-3'). The PCR products were resolved on an 8% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gel and analyzed by phosphorimaging. For analysis of promiscuous hyperediting of apoB RNA, a 317-bp sequence of apoB RNA was amplified using primers ND1 (5'-ATCTGACTGGGAGAGACAAGTAGC-3') and mLiver hypered.rev (5'-CAACAAATAAATAGAGATTATGG-3'). The PCR products were subcloned into PCR-Script (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Ten clones were randomly selected for plasmid DNA isolation and sequencing using an automated sequencer and T3 primer. siRNA silencing of ACF. Small interfering (siRNA) oligonucleotides were selected following established parameters (11), and several candidate primers, both murine and human specific, were purchased from Dharmacon Research Inc. Rat hepatoma cells (McArdle7777; American Type Culture Collection), a rodent cell line known to express ACF (7, 32), and human hepatoma cells (HepG2) were grown to 40% confluence on coverslips and transfected with 100 nM ACF or control-scrambled siRNA oligonucleotides according to the manufacturer's instructions (Ambion). Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were fixed in 10% formalin (Sigma) and probed with a rabbit anti-caspase 3 (active form) antibody (Cell Signaling) followed by a probe with Cy3 secondary antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch). The nuclei were identified using 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1 mg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline). Silencing of ACF protein expression was also assessed by Western blotting of cell lysates from siRNA or scrambled oligonucleotide-transfected cells grown under identical conditions with a rabbit polyclonal ACF antibody (7).
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
In order to determine whether the increased C-to-U editing activity in acf+/ liver was confined to the canonical site at nt 6666, 10 clones were randomly selected from RT-PCR products, and a total of over 3,100 nt sequences was obtained from a region containing eight C residues, including the canonical site (Fig. 3C). The results reveal only one clone (Fig. 3C) in which there was an additional edited C, suggesting that promiscuous editing (25) or hyperediting (31) was not taking place in the setting of increased C-to-U editing at nt 6666. The C-to-U editing of other RNA targets was not examined. Taken together, the functional outcome of the heterozygous targeting of murine acf points to a tissue-specific increase in endogenous apoB RNA editing activity, possibly reflecting a subtle but distinct alteration in the stoichiometry of the core editing complex.
Phenotype associated with homozygous deletion of murine acf.
Three separate lines of acf+/ mice were established from independent founders, two of which were littermates and one of which was from a separate breeding. The progeny were genotyped by PCR (Table 1). We detected no acf/ mice from any of these lines after genotyping 42 litters and 332 offspring, indicating that disruption of the acf locus resulted in embryonic lethality. The litter sizes from these heterozygous matings were similar to those from wild-type littermates (range, 7 to 10), and there was no apparent gender bias. In addition to the absence of homozygous acf/ offspring, we observed a significant increase in heterozygous offspring among all three lines, with the ratio of heterozygous to wild-type mice averaging
10:1 (range, 8.3 to 12.6) (Table 2), instead of the 2:1 ratio predicted from Mendelian inheritance. These genotypes were confirmed by two independent primer sets, as detailed in Fig. 2C, suggesting that trivial explanations, such as genotyping errors, are unlikely to account for the apparent increase in the number of heterozygous offspring. In addition, further crosses of the heterozygous acf+/ (mixed background 129/SvJ x C57BL/6) into an acf wild-type C57BL/6 apobec1/ line resulted in two litters containing a total of 12 mice, all of which were acf+/ (data not shown). The karyotype of the targeted ES cells revealed a normal 40 X,Y distribution, suggesting that there is no chromosomal duplication or major rearrangement occurring in the ES cells used to generate the lines. To our knowledge, there are no other examples of an embryonic lethal phenotype where the distribution of genotypes favors the heterozygosity of the candidate gene, but further dissection of the underlying mechanisms will clearly require additional investigation.
|
|
To further investigate the possibility that acf/ embryos fail to implant, we genotyped 42 blastocysts recovered from the uteri of timed pregnant acf+/ mice at E3.5, a period selected to closely precede implantation. The genotype distribution (Table 1) revealed that 9 were acf/, 6 were wild type, and 27 were heterozygous acf+/. These results indicate that homozygous acf/ embryos almost certainly fail to implant.
Among the mechanisms we considered for the failure of acf/ embryos to implant was an inability to develop properly to the stage where implantation can occur. To assess this possibility, blastocysts (E3.5) were harvested from heterozygous acf+/ mice, cultured for 4 to 7 days, and examined for their ability to develop blastocyst outgrowths (27). The outgrowths were then genotyped by PCR. From 62 cultures, 40 blastocysts remained attached and revealed histological evidence of proliferation of both trophoblasts and inner cell masses (8, 28) (data not shown). Genotype analysis of these 40 outgrowths revealed that 22 were wild type and 18 were heterozygous acf+/. However, no acf/ outgrowths were detected, consistent with the suggestion that acf/ blastocysts degenerate and undergo cell death within the first 4 days of culture. These findings collectively point to the possibility that ACF is required for preimplantation development.
ACF knockdown in somatic cells results in apoptotic death.
To investigate the possibility that ACF is required for cell survival, we undertook ACF knockdown using siRNA-mediated gene silencing. Rat hepatoma cells were transfected with candidate siRNAs targeting different regions of ACF mRNA (Fig. 4A). ACF protein abundance was reduced by >70%, with siRNAs targeting regions located 316 and 823 nucleotides downstream of the initiator ATG, whereas no effect was observed when cells were transfected with scrambled siRNAs (Fig. 4A). In the setting of ACF knockdown, we observed an increased number of apoptotic cells, as indicated by the number of caspase 3-positive nuclei detected in siRNA4-treated cells (Fig. 4B and D). The initiation of apoptosis was supported by the demonstration of cleavage of caspase 3 into its active form (Fig. 4C). The induction of apoptosis was further analyzed by staining with terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling. The delivery of siRNA4 to rat hepatoma cells resulted in a significant, approximately threefold increase of the number of nuclei positive by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (
23%) compared to the number in the scrambled siRNA-treated cells (
8%). The induction of apoptosis in rat hepatoma cells was also replicated in experiments using siRNA knockdown of ACF in primary murine hepatocytes (data not shown).
|
76% (four independent assays) decrease in ACF protein expression (Fig. 5A) and a
30-fold increase in caspase 3-positive-staining nuclei (Fig. 5B). These results reinforce the conclusion that ACF knockdown in somatic cells results in apoptosis. In addition, the findings in HepG2 cells strongly imply that this effect is independent of apobec-1 expression.
|
Summary conclusions. The central finding of this report is that the homozygous deletion of murine acf is associated with embryonic lethality, most likely the result of a developmental defect in blastocyst growth, leading to preimplantation failure. What functional properties of ACF could account for this phenotype? Crucial to its role in catalyzing C-to-U RNA editing is the fact that ACF is an RNA binding protein with high affinity (low kd) for AU-rich RNAs, including apoB RNA, its presumed target (7, 17, 18). In this regard, it is relevant that several AU-rich RNAs, including those for interleukin-6, interleukin-1ß, Cox2, and gamma interferon, are all expressed in the early stages of embryonic development, including the blastocyst stage (24). Although the binding of ACF to these targets has yet to be demonstrated, it is not unreasonable to speculate that altered binding of ACF to any of these or other AU-rich targets might interrupt the development of acf/ embryos. Probing these underlying mechanisms will require alternative approaches to bypass the early lethality associated with germ line deletion. A potentially important clue to the mechanisms involved in the early embryonic lethality has emerged from recent findings by Kinnaird and colleagues (15). These workers have demonstrated that RNA interference-mediated silencing of the Caenorhabditis elegans ACF homolog, HRP-2, leads to embryonic arrest, with 48 h of exposure resulting in a failure to progress beyond the 64-cell stage (15). These findings, considered together with the current data, suggest that ACF is an hnRNP family member with a conserved and nonredundant role in early embryonic development.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We acknowledge the technical assistance of Karen Hutton in the Morphology Core and Ted Simon and Jennifer Stratman in the Mouse Core of the Washington University DDRCC.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Anant, S., J. O. Henderson, D. Mukhopadhyay, N. Navaratnam, S. Kennedy, J. Min, and N. O. Davidson. 2001. Novel role for RNA-binding protein CUGBP2 in mammalian RNA editing. CUGBP2 modulates C to U editing of apolipoprotein B mRNA by interacting with apobec-1 and ACF, the apobec-1 complementation factor. J. Biol. Chem. 276:47338-47351.
3. Anant, S., N. Murmu, C. W. Houchen, D. Mukhopadhyay, T. E. Riehl, S. G. Young, A. R. Morrison, W. F. Stenson, and N. O. Davidson. 2004. Apobec-1 protects intestine from radiation injury through posttranscriptional regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression. Gastroenterology 127:1139-1149.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Blanc, V., and N. O. Davidson. 2003. C-to-U RNA editing: mechanisms leading to genetic diversity. J. Biol. Chem. 278:1395-1398.
5. Blanc, V., J. O. Henderson, S. Kennedy, and N. O. Davidson. 2001. Mutagenesis of apobec-1 complementation factor reveals distinct domains that modulate RNA binding, protein-protein interaction with apobec-1, and complementation of C to U RNA-editing activity. J. Biol. Chem. 276:46386-46393.
6. Blanc, V., S. Kennedy, and N. O. Davidson. 2003. A novel nuclear localization signal in the auxiliary domain of apobec-1 complementation factor regulates nucleocytoplasmic import and shuttling. J. Biol. Chem. 278:41198-41204.
7. Blanc, V., N. Navaratnam, J. O. Henderson, S. Anant, S. Kennedy, A. Jarmuz, J. Scott, and N. O. Davidson. 2001. Identification of GRY-RBP as an apolipoprotein B RNA-binding protein that interacts with both apobec-1 and apobec-1 complementation factor to modulate C to U editing. J. Biol. Chem. 276:10272-10283.
8. Carlone, D. L., and D. G. Skalnik. 2001. CpG binding protein is crucial for early embryonic development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:7601-7606.
9. Chester, A., A. Somasekaram, M. Tzimina, A. Jarmuz, J. Gisbourne, R. O'Keefe, J. Scott, and N. Navaratnam. 2003. The apolipoprotein B mRNA editing complex performs a multifunctional cycle and suppresses nonsense-mediated decay. EMBO J. 22:3971-3982.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Dur, S., K. Krause, N. Pluntke, and J. Greeve. 2004. Gene structure and expression of the mouse APOBEC-1 complementation factor: multiple transcriptional initiation sites and a spliced variant with a premature stop translation codon. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1680:11-23.[Medline]
11. Elbashir, S. M., J. Harborth, K. Weber, and T. Tuschl. 2002. Analysis of gene function in somatic mammalian cells using small interfering RNAs. Methods 26:199-213.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Giannoni, F., D. K. Bonen, T. Funahashi, C. Hadjiagapiou, C. F. Burant, and N. O. Davidson. 1994. Complementation of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing by human liver accompanied by secretion of apolipoprotein B48. J. Biol. Chem. 269:5932-5936.
13. Harris, R. S., S. K. Petersen-Mahrt, and M. S. Neuberger. 2002. RNA editing enzyme APOBEC1 and some of its homologs can act as DNA mutators. Mol. Cell 10:1247-1253.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Henderson, J. O., V. Blanc, and N. O. Davidson. 2001. Isolation, characterization and developmental regulation of the human apobec-1 complementation factor (ACF) gene. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1522:22-30.[Medline]
15. Kinnaird, J. H., K. Maitland, G. A. Walker, I. Wheatley, F. J. Thompson, and E. Devaney. 2004. HRP-2, a heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein, is essential for embryogenesis and oogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp. Cell Res. 298:418-430.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Lellek, H., R. Kirsten, I. Diehl, F. Apostel, F. Buck, and J. Greeve. 2000. Purification and molecular cloning of a novel essential component of the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme-complex. J. Biol. Chem. 275:19848-19856.
17. Mehta, A., and D. M. Driscoll. 2002. Identification of domains in apobec-1 complementation factor required for RNA binding and apolipoprotein-B mRNA editing. RNA 8:69-82.[Abstract]
18. Mehta, A., and D. M. Driscoll. 1998. A sequence-specific RNA-binding protein complements apobec-1 to edit apolipoprotein B mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:4426-4432.
19. Mehta, A., M. T. Kinter, N. E. Sherman, and D. M. Driscoll. 2000. Molecular cloning of apobec-1 complementation factor, a novel RNA-binding protein involved in the editing of apolipoprotein B mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1846-1854.
20. Morrison, J. R., C. Paszty, M. E. Stevens, S. D. Hughes, T. Forte, J. Scott, and E. M. Rubin. 1996. Apolipoprotein B RNA editing enzyme-deficient mice are viable despite alterations in lipoprotein metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7154-7159.
21. Nakamuta, M., B. H. Chang, E. Zsigmond, K. Kobayashi, H. Lei, B. Y. Ishida, K. Oka, E. Li, and L. Chan. 1996. Complete phenotypic characterization of apobec-1 knockout mice with a wild-type genetic background and a human apolipoprotein B transgenic background, and restoration of apolipoprotein B mRNA editing by somatic gene transfer of Apobec-1. J. Biol. Chem. 271:25981-25988.
22. Petersen-Mahrt, S. K., and M. S. Neuberger. 2003. In vitro deamination of cytosine to uracil in single-stranded DNA by apolipoprotein B editing complex catalytic subunit 1 (APOBEC1). J. Biol. Chem. 278:19583-19586.
23. Richardson, N., N. Navaratnam, and J. Scott. 1998. Secondary structure for the apolipoprotein B mRNA editing site. AU-binding proteins interact with a stem loop. J. Biol. Chem. 273:31707-31717.
24. Rothstein, J. L., D. Johnson, J. A. DeLoia, J. Skowronski, D. Solter, and B. Knowles. 1992. Gene expression during preimplantation mouse development. Genes Dev. 6:1190-1201.
25. Siddiqui, J. F., D. Van Mater, M. P. Sowden, and H. C. Smith. 1999. Disproportionate relationship between APOBEC-1 expression and apolipoprotein B mRNA editing activity. Exp. Cell Res. 252:154-164.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Sowden, M. P., D. M. Lehmann, X. Lin, C. O. Smith, and H. C. Smith. 2004. Identification of novel alternative splice variants of APOBEC-1 complementation factor with different capacities to support apolipoprotein B mRNA editing. J. Biol. Chem. 279:197-206.
27. Stopka, T., and A. I. Skoultchi. 2003. The ISWI ATPase Snf2h is required for early mouse development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:14097-14102.
28. Tanaka, Y., N. P. Patestos, T. Maekawa, and S. Ishii. 1999. B-myb is required for inner cell mass formation at an early stage of development. J. Biol. Chem. 274:28067-28070.
29. Teng, B., C. F. Burant, and N. O. Davidson. 1993. Molecular cloning of an apolipoprotein B messenger RNA editing protein. Science 260:1816-1819.
30. Yamanaka, S., M. E. Balestra, L. D. Ferrell, J. Fan, K. S. Arnold, S. Taylor, J. M. Taylor, and T. L. Innerarity. 1995. Apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing protein induces hepatocellular carcinoma and dysplasia in transgenic animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:8483-8487.
31. Yamanaka, S., K. S. Poksay, D. M. Driscoll, and T. L. Innerarity. 1996. Hyperediting of multiple cytidines of apolipoprotein B mRNA by APOBEC-1 requires auxiliary protein(s) but not a mooring sequence motif. J. Biol. Chem. 271:11506-11510.
32. Yang, Y., N. Ballatori, and H. C. Smith. 2002. Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing and the reduction in synthesis and secretion of the atherogenic risk factor, apolipoprotein B100 can be effectively targeted through TAT-mediated protein transduction. Mol. Pharmacol. 61:269-276.
33. Yang, Y., and H. C. Smith. 1997. Multiple protein domains determine the cell type-specific nuclear distribution of the catalytic subunit required for apolipoprotein B mRNA editing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:13075-13080.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|