, and Colocalization with
-H2AX after Topoisomerase I-Induced Replication Damage
Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4255,1 Cancer Research UK Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom2
Received 21 June 2005/ Returned for modification 28 June 2005/ Accepted 20 July 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Top3
) appear essential for the resolution of stalled replication forks (Holliday junctions). We investigated the involvement of BLM in the signaling response to Top1-mediated replication DNA damage. In BLM-complemented cells, BLM colocalized with promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) nuclear bodies and Top3
. Fibroblasts without BLM showed an increased sensitivity to camptothecin, enhanced formation of Top1-DNA complexes, and delayed histone H2AX phosphorylation (
-H2AX). Camptothecin also induced nuclear relocalization of BLM, Top3
, and PML protein and replication-dependent phosphorylation of BLM on threonine 99 (T99p-BLM). T99p-BLM was also observed following replication stress induced by hydroxyurea. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein and AT- and Rad9-related protein kinases, but not DNA-dependent protein kinase, appeared to play a redundant role in phosphorylating BLM. Following camptothecin treatment, T99p-BLM colocalized with
-H2AX but not with Top3
or PML. Thus, BLM appears to dissociate from Top3
and PML following its phosphorylation and facilitates H2AX phosphorylation in response to replication double-strand breaks induced by Top1. A defect in
-H2AX signaling in response to unrepaired replication-mediated double-strand breaks might, at least in part, explain the camptothecin-sensitivity of BLM-deficient cells. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-H2AX (23) (http://discover.nci.nih.gov/pommier/pommier.htm). Camptothecin is, therefore, a well-characterized pharmacological tool for studying the molecular mechanisms involved in cellular responses to replicative stress (23, 48, 59, 62). Top1 cleavage complexes and, therefore, replication double-strand breaks can form in response to common DNA lesions including abasic sites, mismatches, oxidative base lesions, base adducts, and strand breaks (49, 51).
Histone H2AX phosphorylated on serine 139, termed
-H2AX, is one of the earliest known markers of camptothecin-induced replication-associated damage (23). More generally,
-H2AX is a marker of DNA double-strand breaks (45, 54).
-H2AX has been proposed to anchor the broken chromosome ends together and recruit DNA repair elements (5, 20, 23, 45, 53). We have shown previously that
-H2AX is critical for the recruitment of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 (MRN) complex in camptothecin-treated cells and that H2AX deficiency renders cells hypersensitive to camptothecin (23, 53). Using aphidicolin, we also showed that blocking replicative polymerases abrogates
-H2AX formation (23), indicating that
-H2AX forms in response to replication-associated double-strand breaks induced by camptothecin.
The causative gene of the cancer-predisposing genetic disease Bloom's syndrome, BLM, is a member of the RecQ family of DNA helicases (28). BLM is considered a caretaker of the genome (28, 39) and a key component in DNA damage response signaling (22, 52). Evolutionarily conserved and essential for the maintenance of genomic stability, BLM promotes branch migration of Holliday junctions in vitro in an ATP-driven fashion (36, 38, 40, 66, 70). BLM functions in association with topoisomerase III
(Top3
) (68), a type I class of topoisomerases (11, 37, 67, 69). The BLM-Top3
complex can resolve recombination intermediates and prevent the collapse of replication forks and consequent DNA double-strand breaks (35, 38, 68, 70, 72, 75). In conjunction with BLM, Top3
is also important for faithful chromosome segregation during anaphase (26) and meiotic recombination (24), possibly unwinding replicating DNA (41) and replication forks restart (27, 55).
Under unperturbed cell growth conditions, BLM is found in promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) nuclear bodies, where it associates with Top3
, and in the nucleolus (72). PML is one of the best-characterized molecular partners of BLM (35, 71, 72, 75). The PML gene, originally identified as the translocation site with the retinoic acid receptor-
(RAR
) gene forms the PML-RAR
fusion protein in promyelocytic leukemia (8, 16, 56, 57). PML is contained in discrete nuclear structures collectively known as PLM nuclear bodies, Kremer bodies, ND-10, or PML oncogenic domains. In addition to BLM, PML nuclear bodies consist of many proteins including Sp100, SUMO-1, p53, TRADD, Top3
, Rad51, Mre11, NBS1, retinoblastoma, and Daxx (9, 29, 30, 72). The absence of PML disrupts the normal subnuclear localization of BLM and results in an elevation of sister chromatid exchanges (75). While the exact role of PML in DNA damage signal remains to be clarified, its multicomponent association within the nuclear bodies might be indicative of a storage site function in DNA damage response and the regulation of cell cycle, DNA repair, and cell death (16).
The N-terminal domain of BLM directs its packaging in PML nuclear bodies, while the C-terminal domain appears essential for nucleolar localization (72). Cells expressing mutants of the N-terminal regions (residues 135 to 235, 241 to 469, or 402 to 600) of BLM fail to show PML colocalization. The N terminus of BLM is also phosphorylated on threonine 99 and 122 in response to replication blockage by hydroxyurea and ionizing radiation by phosphoinositide 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKKs) (2, 7, 15).
The proposed role of BLM in response to replication defects (1, 15, 22, 58, 60) led us to investigate whether human cells deficient in BLM are altered in their sensitivity and responses to camptothecin. Using isogenic human fibroblast cell lines lacking or expressing the BLM (25), we demonstrate enhanced camptothecin sensitivity, enhanced Top1 cleavage complex formation, and delayed appearance of
-H2AX foci in BLM-deficient cells. We also sought to study the phosphorylation of BLM in response to replication-associated double-strand breaks and to investigate whether such modifications are PIKK- and replication-dependent and signal a change in localization pattern of BLM. We have established the status and consequence of T99 BLM phosphorylation in response to camptothecin as well as hydroxyurea. We also investigated the molecular interactions of total BLM as well as the T99-phosphorylated form of BLM with Top3
,
-H2AX, and PML following replicative stress.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-minimal essential medium, 10% fetal calf serum, and 350 µg/ml G418. For quantitation of proliferative fraction of cells, exponentially growing cultures were pulse labeled with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and propidium iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry. GM00037 (untransformed normal), GM05849 (ataxia telangiectasia [AT]), GM00637 (simian virus 40-transformed, apparently normal) and GM01492 (untransformed Bloom syndrome) human fibroblasts were obtained from the Coriell Cell Repository (Camden, NJ) and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. M059J/Fus1 and M059J/Fus9 cells were donated from Cordula U. Kirchgessner (32) (Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA) and were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum containing 400 µg/ml G418 (Invitrogen). AT- and Rad3-related kinase dead (ATRkd) cells were donated from William A. Cliby (12) (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) and were incubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum containing 400 µg/ml G418. Drugs, chemicals, and IR exposure. Aphidicolin, hydroxyurea, G418, sodium orthovandate, and sodium fluoride were purchased from Sigma Co. (St. Louis, MO), and camptothecin was obtained from the Drug Synthesis Chemistry Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment, National Cancer Institute. For exposure to ionizing radiation (IR), cells growing on chamber slides were exposed to the indicated dose of IR from a 137Cs source in a Mark I irradiator (J. L. Shepherd and Associates, San Fernando, CA). Following drug or IR exposure, cells were incubated at 37°C for indicated times.
Colony formation assay. Cell survival was determined using a colony formation assay after indicated treatments. Monolayers of cells were trypsinized, counted, and plated on six-well, 60-mm sterile polystyrene culture plates. Approximately 100 cells were maintained per well in 3 ml of culture medium and incubated unperturbed for 7 days. Prior to colony counting, culture medium was aspirated, and colonies were treated with 2 ml of fixation solution (50% methanol, 5% acetic acid) for 1 h. After removal of fixation solution, colonies were stained with 3 ml of Wright's Giemsa stain (Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO) for 1 h. Colonies were counted manually.
Immune-complex of Top1-DNA detection assay. Top1-DNA adducts were detected as described previously (50, 63). Briefly, 106 treated or untreated cells were pelleted and immediately lysed in 1% sarkosyl. Following homogenization with a Dounce homogenizer and pestle B, cell lysates were gently layered on cesium chloride step gradients and centrifuged at 165,000 x g for 20 h at 20°C. Half-milliliter fractions were collected, diluted with an equal volume of 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5), and applied to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore) in a slot-blot vacuum manifold (23). Top1-DNA complexes were detected using the C21 Top1 monoclonal antibody (a kind gift from Yung-Chi Cheng, Yale University, New Haven, CT) using standard Western blotting procedures.
Western blot analysis and antibodies. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline following treatment, and total protein was extracted using RIPA buffer. Total protein was quantitated using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and 20 µg of total protein was used for Western blot analysis.
Aliquots of total protein were boiled with Novex Tris-glycine sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 10 min at 95°C and loaded on a Tris-glycine gel for electrophoresis. Fractionated proteins were then transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane by electroblotting. Nonspecific binding was blocked using 5% nonfat dry milk (in Tris-buffered saline-Tween [TBS-T]). Suitable combinations of antibodies were prepared in 1% nonfat dry milk (in TBS-T). Protein was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and normalized to actin or tubulin levels in each extract.
Antibodies used in Western blot analyses were commercially obtained for
-H2AX (Upstate Technologies, CA), PML (PG-M3), anti-goat BLM (Santa Cruz Biotech, CA), actin, and tubulin (Ab-4; Neomarkers, Fremont, CA). A polyclonal antibody against phosphorylated T99 BLM was raised in rabbits (Sigma Genosys, Houston, TX). Crude serum from inoculated rabbits was double-affinity purified using a phospho-peptide and non-phospho-peptide-conjugated Sepharose columns and measured for antibody concentration using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Antibodies for anti-mouse total BLM (residues 1 to 449) and Top3
have been described previously (68).
Protein phosphatase treatment.
Whole-cell lysates were incubated at 30°C with 2,400 U of
protein phosphatase for 60 min prior to Western blot analysis (with MnCl2 in
-phosphatase buffer [pH 7.5 at 25°C]) and used according to the manufacturer's instructions (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). For blockage of phosphatase action, a combination of 10 mM sodium orthovanadate and 50 mM sodium fluoride was added to the protein samples.
Fluorescent confocal microscopy. Cells used for microscopy studies were grown in Nunc chamber slides (Nalgene, Rochester, NY) using 0.5 ml of growth medium. Following treatment, the medium was aspirated out and cells were washed in TBS-T. Cells were then fixed using 2% paraformaldeyde and 70% ethanol at room temperature. To block nonspecific binding, cells were incubated with 8% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h at room temperature. Fixed cells were stained overnight with primary antibodies (in 1% bovine serum albumin) as indicated and tagged with fluorescent secondary antibodies for 2 h. Slides were mounted using Vectashield mounting liquid (Vector Labs) and sealed. Slides were shielded from light and stored at 4°C. Slides were visualized using a Nikon Eclipse TE-300 confocal laser scanning microscope system, and images were captured and stored as JPEG files.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
18 h) compared to the PSNF5 cells (
12 h). However, using BrdU staining and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, we show that the sensitivity in PSNG13 is not due to a greater proliferative fraction (Fig. 1F, % BrdU-positive cells). The BLM-deficient PSNG13 cells also showed a greater loss in the S-phase fraction of cells in response to camptothecin when assayed by measuring BrdU uptake (not shown). Collectively, these results indicate that BLM-deficient cells produce a higher level of Top1-DNA complexes and are hypersensitive to camptothecin compared to BLM-corrected cells.
Delayed H2AX phosphorylation in BLM-deficient cells treated with camptothecin or hydroxyurea.
Phosphorylation of histone H2AX on serine 139 (referred to as
-H2AX) is an early response to replication-mediated double-strand breaks induced by camptothecin (23). The enhanced sensitivity to camptothecin and Top1-DNA complex formation in BLM-deficient PSNG13 cells led us to hypothesize that BLM might play a role in processing camptothecin-induced Top1-mediated DNA damage.
-H2AX focus formation in PSNG13 and PSNF5 cells exposed to camptothecin was investigated by confocal microscopy (Fig. 2A). BLM-deficient cells (PSNG13) displayed a consistent (approximately 30 min) delay in
-H2AX focus formation compared to cells with functional BLM (Fig. 2A and B). We also examined the
-H2AX foci following camptothecin removal. Following a 12-h exposure to 1 µM camptothecin,
-H2AX foci reversed similarly in PSNG13 and PSNF5 cells (Fig. 2A). The effects of camptothecin on
-H2AX were compared to replication damage induced by 1 mM hydroxyurea or to 1 Gy ionizing radiation. A quantification of the appearance of
-H2AX foci at various time points indicated a delayed phosphorylation of H2AX by hydroxyurea but not ionizing radiation in PSNG13 cells (Fig. 2B). Camptothecin-treated BLM-deficient cells also showed slower formation of
-H2AX formation than BLM-complemented cells when assayed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 2C).
-H2AX formation was also examined using normal and Bloom syndrome primary fibroblasts (GM00037 and GM01492, respectively). The BLM-deficient GM01492 cells showed delayed appearance of
-H2AX foci following camptothecin treatment. Collectively, these results suggest that BLM has a role in the initial DNA damage recognition of Top1-DNA complexes and accurate propagation of the DNA damage signal to PIKKs that modify H2AX following exposure of cells to camptothecin and hydroxyurea.
|
in response to camptothecin.
To investigate the molecular relationships between BLM and the cellular response to Top1-mediated DNA damage by camptothecin, we analyzed the localization patterns of BLM with PML or Top3
by confocal microscopy (Fig. 3A to C). In untreated BLM-complemented PSNF5 cells, BLM and Top3
were colocalized in nuclear foci together with PML. The number of foci per cell was at an average of eight per nucleus, which is consistent with the pattern previously reported in other cell types with wild-type BLM (Fig. 3A to C and Table 1) (21, 58).
|
|
and PML foci after camptothecin. Furthermore, replicative stress changed the localization pattern of BLM with Top3
and PML by slightly reducing the colocalized fraction from the >95% costaining observed in control cells (Fig. 3 and Table 2). Quantitative analysis of representative cell populations at 1 h showed that after replicative stress, approximately 68% of foci counted were positive for both BLM and Top3
, while 10% and 22% of the foci contained either Top3
or BLM only, respectively. Additionally, 81% of the foci counted were positive for both BLM and PML, while 8% and 11% contained either PML or BLM only, respectively. Finally, 72% of the foci counted costained for Top3
and PML, while 5% and 23% of the foci were positive for Top3
or PML only, respectively.
|
|
within PML nuclear bodies in BLM-deficient cells has been reported previously (35, 73). Untreated BLM-deficient PSNG13 cells showed a lower fraction of nuclei with clear Top3
and PML foci than the BLM-complemented cells (Fig. 3D). Following camptothecin treatment, there was an increase in the number of PML and Top3
foci with a colocalized fraction of approximately 43% after 1 h. The protein level for PML, but not Top3
, was also found to increase after 6 h of camptothecin treatment in a BLM-independent manner (Fig. 3E and F).
In summary, Top1-trapping by camptothecin led to an increase in BLM, Top3
, and PML foci and slightly reduced colocalization of BLM with Top3
and PML.
Phosphorylation of BLM on T99 in response to replication double-strand breaks induced by camptothecin. Hydroxyurea has been shown previously to influence cellular BLM, most notably by inducing phosphorylation of T99 and T122. Detailed studies on the consequences of such phosphorylation have been limited by the availability of an antibody directed to the T99 phosphorylation site on BLM. Therefore, we first generated T99 phosphorylation-specific antisera in rabbits. Control experiments using crude serum extracted after phospho-peptide inoculation as well as the affinity-purified antibody showed a signal in PSNF5 extracts treated with hydroxyurea (Fig. 4A). In contrast, preimmunization rabbit serum and nonphosphorylated column eluate did not show signal in lysates from hydroxyurea-treated PSNF5 cells. Also, lysates from BLM-deficient PSNG13 cells treated with hydroxyurea did not elicit signal. Cellular lysates obtained from BLM-complemented PSNF5 cells demonstrated T99 phosphorylation in response to camptothecin at 1 and 6 h by Western blotting (Fig. 4B). The signal was lost after lambda protein phosphatase treatment, demonstrating that a phospho-epitope was being recognized.
|
We next investigated whether the formation of phosphorylated BLM foci was related to replication-mediated double-strand breaks (23, 62). For this purpose, cells were pretreated with aphidicolin, a specific inhibitor of replication polymerases that prevents the formation of camptothecin-induced replication-mediated DNA double-strand breaks (Fig. 5A) (23, 31, 34). As shown in Fig. 5B, T99p-BLM appeared as a subset of total BLM foci in camptothecin-treated PSNF5 fibroblasts. Aphidicolin pretreatment inhibited the formation of T99p-BLM foci in response to camptothecin (Fig. 5B and C). Collectively, these results indicate that camptothecin induces T99 phosphorylation of BLM and focus formation by T99p-BLM in a DNA replication-dependent manner.
Role of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK in phosphorylating BLM on T99 following replication double-strand breaks induced by camptothecin. We compared the contribution of AT mutated protein (ATM), ATR, and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), for phosphorylation of BLM on T99 by using a panel of genetically modified cell lines deficient in the respective proteins. Using confocal microscopy, we analyzed the generation of T99p-BLM foci following camptothecin exposure in AT (GM05849) and normal fibroblasts (GM00637) (Fig. 6A). The quantitation of foci observed is plotted in Fig. 6C. T99p-BLM foci in AT cells treated for 1 and 2 h with camptothecin were compared to normal fibroblasts. We also compared the level of focus formation in doxycycline-induced ATRkd and ATR wild-type cells (Fig. 6B). ATRkd cells were treated with 1 µg/ml doxycycline to induce the expression of ATR kinase inactive, resulting in ATR kinase dominant-negative status (12). Although cells treated with camptothecin for 1 h showed reduced foci in ATRkd cells, at 2- and 3-h time points the phosphorylation of BLM appeared comparable. In contrast, cells deficient for the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK (MO59J/Fus9) and complemented with DNA-PK (MO59J/Fus1) did not show any apparent difference in focus counts after camptothecin (Fig. 6D). Collectively, ATM kinase and, to a lesser extent, ATR are involved in the early phosphorylation of BLM on T99. This result is also indicative of a redundancy between ATM and ATR for phosphorylating BLM in response to replicative damage.
|
-H2AX and tends to dissociate from Top3
or PML in response to camptothecin.
To investigate the role of T99-phosphorylated BLM in the response to replication damage by Top1-DNA complexes induced by camptothecin, we investigated the relative localization of T99p-BLM with
-H2AX, Top3
, and PML (Fig. 7A to F).
-H2AX foci mark the sites of replicative double-strand breaks induced by camptothecin (23). T99p-BLM was closely colocalized with
-H2AX (Fig. 7A, 94% average colocalization; Table 2). However, T99p-BLM appeared at different sites from the PML nuclear bodies (30% average colocalization) (Fig. 7B and Table 2). Also, approximately 58% of T99-pBLM failed to associate with Top3
(Fig. 7C and Table 2). The difference in the colocalization patterns of BLM versus T99p-BLM is represented in Fig. 7G and Table 2. Total BLM and
-H2AX showed an average of 82% colocalization (Fig. 7D). It is also of note that only 17% of PML (Fig. 7E) and 38% of Top3
(Fig. 7F) were associated with
-H2AX in response to camptothecin. These results demonstrate coincident induction and colocalization of phosphorylated BLM (T99p-BLM) and H2AX (
-H2AX). They also indicate dissociation of T99p-BLM from Top3
in response to replication double-strand breaks induced by camptothecin.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We observed an unexpected delay in phosphorylation of H2AX in BLM-deficient cells treated with camptothecin (Fig. 2). The delay in H2AX phosphorylation was also apparent with hydroxyurea but not with ionizing radiation, suggesting a replication-dependent defect in signaling for
-H2AX in BLM-deficient cells. Thus, under replicative stress, BLM might act as a transducer facilitating H2AX phosphorylation in response to replication damage. This proposed role for BLM is consistent with a recent report showing that cells lacking BLM are deficient in activating/phosphorylating the DNA damage sensor kinase ATM at serine 1981 in response to hydroxyurea (14). The absence of BLM has also been shown to impair the focus forming ability of the MRN complex and BRCA1 in response to hydroxyurea (13, 21). It is therefore likely that the signaling for
-H2AX by BLM is indirect via ATM and PIKKs or the MRN complex. To our knowledge, the only other protein known to similarly promote
-H2AX formation by the PIKKs is MDC1 (mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1). MDC1 silencing has been demonstrated to abrogate the phosphorylation of H2AX as well as BRCA1, DNA-PK, and Chk1 and the formation of foci containing Nbs1, 53BP1, and BRCA1 (42, 43, 61). Thus, our results suggest that BLM functions as a transducer facilitating histone H2AX phosphorylation and recruitment of repair factors under replicative stress.
Replication-dependent phosphorylation of BLM (T99p-BLM) and colocalization with
-H2AX.
To further examine the upstream events leading to BLM phosphorylation and the potential interactions between phosphorylated BLM and PML, Top3
, and
-H2AX, we generated phosphospecific T99p-BLM polyclonal antibodies. Previously, three kinases, ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK, have been suggested in separate reports to be involved in BLM phosphorylation (7, 15, 44). We first tested cells deficient in the PIKKs (ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK) for their ability to generate T99p-BLM foci and found evidence to suggest an overlapping role for the ATM and ATR kinases in initiating this phosphorylation (Fig. 6A and B). The loss of DNA-PK did not appear to abrogate the phosphorylation of BLM (Fig. 6D). Thus, we conclude that there is redundancy in the PIKK system for phosphorylating BLM on T99. It is likely that the nature of DNA damage and the damage sensors involved could play a role in selecting one or more of these kinases for modifying BLM.
Data obtained with our phospho-specific T99p-BLM antibodies provide evidence for the selective localization of the phosphorylated form of BLM to sites of replication double-strand breaks (
-H2AX foci) after camptothecin treatment. The T99p-BLM appeared as a fraction of the total BLM nuclear signal. While we observed a strict colocalization between the T99p-BLM and
-H2AX, T99p-BLM did not colocalize with PML or Top3
to the extent of BLM (Fig. 7). Most importantly, we conclude that the phosphorylated BLM on T99 is strictly associated with
-H2AX at the replication damage sites. Using aphidicolin, we demonstrate a replication-dependent phosphorylation of BLM by camptothecin (Fig. 5A). A recent report from Eladad et al. suggests that the intracellular trafficking of BLM to the PML nuclear bodies is regulated by SUMO modification (18). Another component of a BLM complex that could regulate its translocation is the recently identified BLAP75 protein (74). BLAP75 was found to colocalize with BLM, while its deficiency led to the abrogation of BLM phosphorylation and the instability of BLM and Top3
protein levels after DNA damage. It is therefore possible that the translocation of BLM following replication stress is regulated by phosphorylation-independent events.
Dual function of BLM in replication fork repair and DNA damage signaling.
We present a molecular interaction map (3) for the proposed functions of BLM following replication stress in response to Top1-DNA cleavage complexes (Fig. 8). Under healthy conditions, both BLM and Top3
are found at the potential storage sites of PML nuclear bodies (Fig. 8A) (9, 29, 30, 72). Our finding that total BLM and Top3
proteins remain associated following DNA damage supports the proposed function of BLM and Top3
as a repair complex (Fig. 3A to D) (16, 19, 71). The relocalization and diffusion of BLM in association with Top3
are consistent with a functional role of the BLM-Top3
complex. The BLM-Top3
complex has been proposed to resolve stalled replication forks by resolution of recombination intermediates (double Holliday junctions) (35, 38, 68, 70, 72, 75). It has also been proposed that Top1-induced replication double-strand breaks could be resolved by replication fork regression and formation of double Holliday junctions (48). BLM helicase activity could also restart replication forks following resolution (Fig. 7B) (see also Fig. 6 in reference 45).
|
-H2AX formation and phosphorylation of BLM on T99 by PIKKs (ATM/ATR) around the break sites. The lack of colocalization between Top3
and T99p-BLM suggests that phosphorylation of BLM on T99 leads to its dissociation from Top3
. T99p-BLM might then act independently of Top3
, possibly as a signaling molecule in replication repair. Collectively, these results suggest that phosphorylation of BLM under replication stress might signal a unique functional switch in response to replication damage. Recent studies utilizing sgs1
strains of S. cerevisiae have revealed a role for Sgs1p in signaling S-phase DNA damage (10).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research. P.S.N. and I.D.H. were supported by Cancer Research, UK.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Ababou, M., S. Dutertre, Y. Lecluse, R. Onclercq, B. Chatton, and M. Amor-Gueret. 2000. ATM-dependent phosphorylation and accumulation of endogenous BLM protein in response to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 19:5955-5963.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Aladjem, M. I., S. Pasa, S. Parodi, J. N. Weinstein, Y. Pommier, and K. W. Kohn. 2004. Molecular interaction mapsa diagrammatic graphical language for bioregulatory networks. Sci. STKE 2004:pe8.
4. Barnett, A. A. 1996. FDA approve bark-derived drug. Lancet 347:1613.[Medline]
5. Bassing, C. H., and F. W. Alt. 2004. H2AX may function as an anchor to hold broken chromosomal DNA ends in close proximity. Cell Cycle 3:149-153.[Medline]
6. Bastin-Shanower, S. A., W. M. Fricke, J. R. Mullen, and S. J. Brill. 2003. The mechanism of Mus81-Mms4 cleavage site selection distinguishes it from the homologous endonuclease Rad1-Rad10. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:3487-3496.
7. Beamish, H., P. Kedar, H. Kaneko, P. Chen, T. Fukao, C. Peng, S. Beresten, N. Gueven, D. Purdie, S. Lees-Miller, N. Ellis, N. Kondo, and M. F. Lavin. 2002. Functional link between BLM defective in Bloom's syndrome and the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated protein, ATM. J. Biol. Chem. 277:30515-30523.
8. Bernardi, R., and P. P. Pandolfi. 2003. Role of PML and the PML-nuclear body in the control of programmed cell death. Oncogene 22:9048-9057.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Biamonti, G. 2004. Nuclear stress bodies: a heterochromatin affair? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:493-498.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Bjergbaek, L., J. A. Cobb, M. Tsai-Pflugfelder, and S. M. Gasser. 2005. Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance. EMBO J. 24:405-417.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Champoux, J. J. 2001. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70:369-413.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Cliby, W. A., C. J. Roberts, K. A. Cimprich, C. M. Stringer, J. R. Lamb, S. L. Schreiber, and S. H. Friend. 1998. Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints. EMBO J. 17:159-169.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Davalos, A. R., and J. Campisi. 2003. Bloom syndrome cells undergo p53-dependent apoptosis and delayed assembly of BRCA1 and NBS1 repair complexes at stalled replication forks. J. Cell Biol. 162:1197-1209.
14. Davalos, A. R., P. Kaminker, R. K. Hansen, and J. Campisi. 2004. ATR and ATM-dependent movement of BLM helicase during replication stress ensures optimal ATM activation and 53BP1 focus formation. Cell Cycle 3:1579-1586.[Medline]
15. Davies, S. L., P. S. North, A. Dart, N. D. Lakin, and I. D. Hickson. 2004. Phosphorylation of the Bloom's syndrome helicase and its role in recovery from S-phase arrest. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:1279-1291.
16. Dellaire, G., and D. P. Bazett-Jones. 2004. PML nuclear bodies: dynamic sensors of DNA damage and cellular stress. Bioessays 26:963-977.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Doe, C. L., J. S. Ahn, J. Dixon, and M. C. Whitby. 2002. Mus81-Eme1 and Rqh1 involvement in processing stalled and collapsed replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 277:32753-32759.
18. Eladad, S., T. Z. Ye, P. Hu, M. Leversha, S. Beresten, M. J. Matunis, and N. A. Ellis. 2005. Intra-nuclear trafficking of the BLM helicase to DNA damage-induced foci is regulated by SUMO modification. Hum. Mol. Genet.
19. Eskiw, C. H., G. Dellaire, and D. P. Bazett-Jones. 2004. Chromatin contributes to structural integrity of promyelocytic leukemia bodies through a SUMO-1-independent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 279:9577-9585.
20. Fernandez-Capetillo, O., A. Lee, M. Nussenzweig, and A. Nussenzweig. 2004. H2AX: the histone guardian of the genome. DNA Repair 3:959-967.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Franchitto, A., and P. Pichierri. 2002. Bloom's syndrome protein is required for correct relocalization of RAD50/MRE11/NBS1 complex after replication fork arrest. J. Cell Biol. 157:19-30.
22. Franchitto, A., and P. Pichierri. 2002. Protecting genomic integrity during DNA replication: correlation between Werner's and Bloom's syndrome gene products and the MRE11 complex. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11:2447-2453.
23. Furuta, T., H. Takemura, Z. Y. Liao, G. J. Aune, C. Redon, O. A. Sedelnikova, D. R. Pilch, E. P. Rogakou, A. Celeste, H. T. Chen, A. Nussenzweig, M. I. Aladjem, W. M. Bonner, and Y. Pommier. 2003. Phosphorylation of histone H2AX and activation of Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 in response to replication-dependent DNA double-strand breaks induced by mammalian DNA topoisomerase I cleavage complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 278:20303-20312.
24. Gangloff, S., B. de Massy, L. Arthur, R. Rothstein, and F. Fabre. 1999. The essential role of yeast topoisomerase III in meiosis depends on recombination. EMBO J. 18:1701-1711.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Gaymes, T. J., P. S. North, N. Brady, I. D. Hickson, G. J. Mufti, and F. V. Rassool. 2002. Increased error-prone non-homologous DNA end-joininga proposed mechanism of chromosomal instability in Bloom's syndrome. Oncogene 21:2525-2533.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Goodwin, A., S. W. Wang, T. Toda, C. Norbury, and I. D. Hickson. 1999. Topoisomerase III is essential for accurate nuclear division in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:4050-4058.
27. Heyer, W. D. 2004. Damage signaling: RecQ sends an SOS to you. Curr. Biol. 14:R895-R897.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Hickson, I. D. 2003. RecQ helicases: caretakers of the genome. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3:169-178.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Hodges, M., C. Tissot, K. Howe, D. Grimwade, and P. S. Freemont. 1998. Structure, organization, and dynamics of promyelocytic leukemia protein nuclear bodies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63:297-304.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Hofmann, T. G., and H. Will. 2003. Body language: the function of PML nuclear bodies in apoptosis regulation. Cell Death Differ. 10:1290-1299.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Holm, C., J. M. Covey, D. Kerrigan, and Y. Pommier. 1989. Differential requirement of DNA replication for the cytotoxicity of DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors in Chinese hamster DC3F cells. Cancer Res. 49:6365-6368.
32. Hoppe, B. S., R. B. Jensen, and C. U. Kirchgessner. 2000. Complementation of the radiosensitive M059J cell line. Radiat. Res. 153:125-130.[Medline]
33. Hsiang, Y. H., R. Hertzberg, S. Hecht, and L. F. Liu. 1985. Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase I. J. Biol. Chem. 260:14873-14878.
34. Hsiang, Y. H., M. G. Lihou, and L. F. Liu. 1989. Arrest of replication forks by drug-stabilized topoisomerase I-DNA cleavable complexes as a mechanism of cell killing by camptothecin. Cancer Res. 49:5077-5082.
35. Hu, P., S. F. Beresten, A. J. van Brabant, T. Z. Ye, P. P. Pandolfi, F. B. Johnson, L. Guarente, and N. A. Ellis. 2001. Evidence for BLM and topoisomerase III
interaction in genomic stability. Hum. Mol. Genet. 10:1287-1298.
36. Huber, M. D., D. C. Lee, and N. Maizels. 2002. G4 DNA unwinding by BLM and Sgs1p: substrate specificity and substrate-specific inhibition. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3954-3961.
37. Johnson, F. B., D. B. Lombard, N. F. Neff, M. A. Mastrangelo, W. Dewolf, N. A. Ellis, R. A. Marciniak, Y. Yin, R. Jaenisch, and L. Guarente. 2000. Association of the Bloom syndrome protein with topoisomerase III
in somatic and meiotic cells. Cancer Res. 60:1162-1167.
38. Karow, J. K., A. Constantinou, J. L. Li, S. C. West, and I. D. Hickson. 2000. The Bloom's syndrome gene product promotes branch migration of holliday junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6504-6508.
39. Khakhar, R. R., J. A. Cobb, L. Bjergbaek, I. D. Hickson, and S. M. Gasser. 2003. RecQ helicases: multiple roles in genome maintenance. Trends Cell Biol. 13:493-501.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Li, W., S. M. Kim, J. Lee, and W. G. Dunphy. 2004. Absence of BLM leads to accumulation of chromosomal DNA breaks during both unperturbed and disrupted S phases. J. Cell Biol. 165:801-812.
41. Liao, S., J. Graham, and H. Yan. 2000. The function of Xenopus Bloom's syndrome protein homolog (xBLM) in DNA replication. Genes Dev. 14:2570-2575.
42. Lou, Z., B. P. Chen, A. Asaithamby, K. Minter-Dykhouse, D. J. Chen, and J. Chen. 2004. MDC1 regulates DNA-PK autophosphorylation in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 279:46359-46362.
43. Lou, Z., C. C. Chini, K. Minter-Dykhouse, and J. Chen. 2003. Mediator of DNA damage checkpoint protein 1 regulates BRCA1 localization and phosphorylation in DNA damage checkpoint control. J. Biol. Chem. 278:13599-13602.
44. Onclercq-Delic, R., P. Calsou, C. Delteil, B. Salles, D. Papadopoulo, and M. Amor-Gueret. 2003. Possible anti-recombinogenic role of Bloom's syndrome helicase in double-strand break processing. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:6272-6282.
45. Paull, T. T., E. P. Rogakou, V. Yamazaki, C. U. Kirchgessner, M. Gellert, and W. M. Bonner. 2000. A critical role for histone H2AX in recruitment of repair factors to nuclear foci after DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 10:886-895.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Pizzolato, J. F., and L. B. Saltz. 2003. The camptothecins. Lancet 361:2235-2242.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Pommier, Y., and J. Cherfils. 2005. Interfacial inhibition of macromolecular interactions: nature's paradigm for drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 26:138-145.[CrossRef][Medline]
48. Pommier, Y., C. Redon, V. A. Rao, J. A. Seiler, O. Sordet, H. Takemura, S. Antony, L. Meng, Z. Liao, G. Kohlhagen, H. Zhang, and K. W. Kohn. 2003. Repair of and checkpoint response to topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage. Mutat. Res. 532:173-203.[Medline]
49. Pourquier, P., and Y. Pommier. 2001. Topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage. Adv. Cancer Res. 80:189-216.[Medline]
50. Pourquier, P., Y. Takebayashi, Y. Urasaki, C. Gioffre, G. Kohlhagen, and Y. Pommier. 2000. Induction of topoisomerase I cleavage complexes by 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C) in vitro and in ara-C-treated cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:1885-1890.
51. Pourquier, P., L. M. Ueng, G. Kohlhagen, A. Mazumder, M. Gupta, K. W. Kohn, and Y. Pommier. 1997. Effects of uracil incorporation, DNA mismatches, and abasic sites on cleavage and religation activities of mammalian topoisomerase I. J. Biol. Chem. 272:7792-7796.
52. Rassool, F. V., P. S. North, G. J. Mufti, and I. D. Hickson. 2003. Constitutive DNA damage is linked to DNA replication abnormalities in Bloom's syndrome cells. Oncogene 22:8749-8757.[CrossRef][Medline]
53. Redon, C., D. R. Pilch, E. P. Rogakou, A. H. Orr, N. F. Lowndes, and W. M. Bonner. 2003. Yeast histone 2A serine 129 is essential for the efficient repair of checkpoint-blind DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 4:678-684.[CrossRef][Medline]
54. Rogakou, E. P., D. R. Pilch, A. H. Orr, V. S. Ivanova, and W. M. Bonner. 1998. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 273:5858-5868.
55. Rothstein, R., B. Michel, and S. Gangloff. 2000. Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break." Genes Dev. 14:1-10.
56. Ruggero, D., Z. G. Wang, and P. P. Pandolfi. 2000. The puzzling multiple lives of PML and its role in the genesis of cancer. Bioessays 22:827-835.[CrossRef][Medline]
57. Salomoni, P., and P. P. Pandolfi. 2002. The role of PML in tumor suppression. Cell 108:165-170.[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Sengupta, S., A. I. Robles, S. P. Linke, N. I. Sinogeeva, R. Zhang, R. Pedeux, I. M. Ward, A. Celeste, A. Nussenzweig, J. Chen, T. D. Halazonetis, and C. C. Harris. 2004. Functional interaction between BLM helicase and 53BP1 in a Chk1-mediated pathway during S-phase arrest. J. Cell Biol. 166:801-813.
59. Shao, R. G., C. X. Cao, H. Zhang, K. W. Kohn, M. S. Wold, and Y. Pommier. 1999. Replication-mediated DNA damage by camptothecin induces phosphorylation of RPA by DNA-dependent protein kinase and dissociates RPA:DNA-PK complexes. EMBO J. 18:1397-1406.[CrossRef][Medline]
60. Stewart, E., C. R. Chapman, F. Al-Khodairy, A. M. Carr, and T. Enoch. 1997. rqh1+, a fission yeast gene related to the Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes, is required for reversible S phase arrest. EMBO J. 16:2682-2692.[CrossRef][Medline]
61. Stewart, G. S., B. Wang, C. R. Bignell, A. M. Taylor, and S. J. Elledge. 2003. MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint. Nature 421:961-966.[CrossRef][Medline]
62. Strumberg, D., A. A. Pilon, M. Smith, R. Hickey, L. Malkas, and Y. Pommier. 2000. Conversion of topoisomerase I cleavage complexes on the leading strand of ribosomal DNA into 5' phosphorylated DNA double-strand breaks by replication runoff. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:3977-3987.
63. Subramanian, D., C. S. Furbee, and M. T. Muller. 2001. ICE bioassay. Isolating in vivo complexes of enzyme to DNA. Methods Mol. Biol. 95:137-147.[Medline]
64. Takimoto, C. H., and S. G. Arbuck. 1997. Clinical status and optimal use of topotecan. Oncology 11:1635-1646.[Medline]
65. Tanizawa, A., K. W. Kohn, G. Kohlhagen, F. Leteurtre, and Y. Pommier. 1995. Differential stabilization of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I cleavable complexes by camptothecin derivatives. Biochemistry 34:7200-7206.[CrossRef][Medline]
66. van Brabant, A. J., R. Stan, and N. A. Ellis. 2000. DNA helicases, genomic instability, and human genetic disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 1:409-459.[CrossRef][Medline]
67. Wang, J. C. 2002. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:430-440.[CrossRef][Medline]
68. Wu, L., S. L. Davies, P. S. North, H. Goulaouic, J. F. Riou, H. Turley, K. C. Gatter, and I. D. Hickson. 2000. The Bloom's syndrome gene product interacts with topoisomerase III. J. Biol. Chem. 275:9636-9644.
69. Wu, L., and I. D. Hickson. 2002. The Bloom's syndrome helicase stimulates the activity of human topoisomerase III
. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:4823-4829.
70. Wu, L., and I. D. Hickson. 2003. The Bloom's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426:870-874.[CrossRef][Medline]
71. Xu, Z. X., A. Timanova-Atanasova, R. X. Zhao, and K. S. Chang. 2003. PML colocalizes with and stabilizes the DNA damage response protein TopBP1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:4247-4256.
72. Yankiwski, V., R. A. Marciniak, L. Guarente, and N. F. Neff. 2000. Nuclear structure in normal and Bloom syndrome cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5214-5219.
73. Yankiwski, V., J. P. Noonan, and N. F. Neff. 2001. The C-terminal domain of the Bloom syndrome DNA helicase is essential for genomic stability. BMC Cell Biol. 2:11.[CrossRef][Medline]
74. Yin, J., A. Sobeck, C. Xu, A. R. Meetei, M. Hoatlin, L. Li, and W. Wang. 2005. BLAP75, an essential component of Bloom's syndrome protein complexes that maintain genome integrity. EMBO J.
75. Zhong, S., P. Hu, T. Z. Ye, R. Stan, N. A. Ellis, and P. P. Pandolfi. 1999. A role for PML and the nuclear body in genomic stability. Oncogene 18:7941-7947.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles: