Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, February 2005, p. 1041-1053, Vol. 25, No. 3
0270-7306/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.25.3.1041-1053.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Reproduction and Development,1 MGC-Department of Cell Biology and Genetics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam,2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands3
Received 24 May 2004/ Returned for modification 22 July 2004/ Accepted 25 October 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, histone H2A ubiquitination is not required for cell growth or sporulation (47), but histone H2B ubiquitination is an essential mechanism involved in sporulation (37). Most importantly, it has been shown that ubiquitination of H2B by the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme RAD6, interacting with the ubiquitin ligase BRE1, is a prerequisite for dimethylation of histone H3 at lysine residues 4 and 79 (5, 12, 37, 46). This mechanism is thought to be associated with potentiation of gene activation. It is not known whether this "trans-histone" mechanism is conserved between yeast and mammals. RAD6 shows marked evolutionary conservation. The two mammalian homologs of yeast RAD6, Hr6a/Ube2a and Hr6b/Ube2b, both show approximately 70% amino acid sequence identity to yeast RAD6. Previously, we have investigated histone ubiquitination in mice deficient in Hr6b/Ube2B. X-chromosomal Hr6a/Ube2a and autosomal Hr6b/Ube2b are functionally equivalent in somatic cells, but gametogenesis requires differential expression or differential functions of the two genes or both (38, 39). Hr6a knockout mice show maternal factor infertility (lack of embryo development beyond the two-cell stage), whereas Hr6b knockout mice display male infertility (severely impaired spermatogenesis) (38, 39). Hr6a Hr6b double-knockout mice are not viable. No defect in H2A ubiquitination was observed in spermatogenic cells of Hr6b knockout mice, and the level of H2B ubiquitination was too low to be detected in wild-type and knockout tissues and cells (1).
In mammalian cells, H2A ubiquitination is far more prominent than H2B ubiquitination, and the functional relevance of these modifications in higher organisms remains elusive (56). Marked H2A ubiquitination was observed in meiotic prophase cells, in particular in a specific subnuclear region that contains the heterochromatic X and Y chromosomes (1). This region is called the sex body or XY body, which is formed at the beginning of meiotic prophase, when homologous chromosomes align. This process of chromosome alignment requires development of a protein structure that holds the two chromosomes together, the synaptonemal complex (16). First, axial elements attach to the chromosomal cores, and subsequently the central and transverse elements form the connection. One of the axial element proteins is Sycp3, and immunostaining for this protein is a useful tool to follow progression through meiotic prophase. Synaptonemal complex formation coincides with chromosome pairing and synapsis. The heterologous X and Y chromosomes are covered by Sycp3 along their whole length but show synapsis only in short pseudoautosomal regions. From late zygotene onwards, the X and Y chromosomes in the XY body are transcriptionally silent (29).
Localization of ubiquitinated histone H2A (ubi-H2A) to transcriptionally silent XY body chromatin may signify that H2A ubiquitination is linked to transcriptional silencing, also in other chromatin regions and not only in meiotic prophase. The aim of the experiments presented in this paper was to obtain additional information concerning a possible connection between histone H2A ubiquitination and formation or maintenance of silent chromatin regions.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of acid soluble nuclear proteins and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Nuclei and acid-soluble proteins were isolated from cell preparations as described by Chen et al. (6). The isolated protein fraction was precipitated with 5% (wt/vol) trichloroacetic acid. First-dimension acetic acid-urea-Triton (AUT) gels were run as described by Davie (9) and contained 0.8 M acetic acid, 6 M urea, and 0.375% (vol/vol) Triton X-100. The AUT strips were placed on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-15% polyacrylamide gels and blotted on nitrocellulose (0.45-µm pore size), using Mini-Protean II electrophoresis and blot cells (Bio-Rad, La Jolla, Calif.). After equilibration of the gel for 30 min in 50 mM acetic acid and 0.5% (wt/vol) SDS, blotting was performed in 25 mM 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid buffer (pH 10) with 20% (vol/vol) methanol according to the protocol described by Thiriet and Albert (48). ubi-H2A was detected as described by Baarends et al. (1).
Meiotic spread nucleus preparations and immunocytochemistry.
Embryonal ovaries were isolated at embryonic day 18 from wild-type, XO, and XYtdym1 embryos (generated on a random-bred MF1 background from stocks maintained at the National Institute for Medical Research, London, United Kingdom, and made available by P. Burgoyne, London, United Kingdom). Testes were obtained from 5-week-old wild-type and T(1;13)70H/T(1;13)1Wa (T/T') mice (Swiss random bred) and from one adult rat (Wistar). Human testicular tissue was obtained as remnant material from a testicular biopsy. Testis and ovary tissues were processed for immunocytochemistry as described by Peters et al. (33). Spread nuclei of spermatocytes and oocytes were double or triple stained with rabbit polyclonal or mouse monoclonal anti-Sycp3 (a gift from C. Heyting, Wageningen, The Netherlands), mouse monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-ubi-H2A (Upstate, Waltham, Mass.), mouse monoclonal anti-RNA polymerase II (the 8wg16 detects total RNA polymerase II) (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom), mouse monoclonal anti-trimethylated H3 lysine 27 (Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-Rad18Sc (as described by van der Laan et al. [53]), rabbit polyclonal antiubiquitin (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), rabbit polyclonal anti-trimethylated H3 lysine 9 (Upstate), rabbit polyclonal anti-Hr6a/b (1:100) (described by van der Laan et al. [53]), and rabbit polyclonal anti-
-H2AX (Upstate). For polyclonal primary antibodies, the secondary antibodies were fluorescein isothiocyanate (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), tetramethyl rhodamine isocyanate (TRITC) (Sigma), or Alexa 350 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.)-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG antibodies; FITC-, TRITC-, or Alexa 350-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG and FITC-labeled goat anti-mouse IgM (Sigma) were used as secondary antibodies for monoclonal anti-Sycp3 (IgG), anti-RNA polymerase II (IgG), anti-trimethylated H3 lysine 27, and anti-ubi-H2A (IgM). To perform double immunolabelings with mouse monoclonal anti-ubi-H2A IgM and mouse monoclonal anti-trimethylated H3 lysine 27, cells were first immunostained with anti-ubi-H2A, followed by immunostaining with anti-trimethylated H3 lysine 27. Negative controls were included to verify that the secondary IgG antibody did not cross-react with remaining anti-ubi-H2A IgM from the first round of immunocytochemistry. Before incubation with antibodies, slides were washed in PBS (three times for 10 min each), and nonspecific sites were blocked with 0.5% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.5% (wt/vol) milk powder in PBS. Primary antibodies were diluted in 10% (wt/vol) BSA in PBS, and incubations were overnight at room temperature in a humid chamber. Subsequently, slides were washed (three times for 10 min each) in PBS, blocked in 10% (vol/vol) normal goat serum (Sigma) in blocking buffer (supernatant of 5% [wt/vol] milk powder in PBS centrifuged at 20,800 x g for 10 min), and incubated with secondary antibodies in 10% normal goat serum in blocking buffer at room temperature for 2 h. Finally, the slides were washed (three times for 10 min each) in PBS (in the dark) and embedded in Vectashield containing DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.) to counterstain the DNA. When Alexa 350-labeled second antibody was present on the slides, Vectashield without DAPI was used. Fluorescent images from spread nuclei were observed with a fluorescence microscope (Axioplan 2; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) equipped with a digital camera (Coolsnap-pro; Photometrics, Waterloo, Canada). Digital images were processed with Photoshop software (Adobe Systems).
FISH. Following immunocytochemistry, the positions of selected nuclei on the slide were determined, and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with STAR*FISH mouse whole-chromosome-specific paints (1200XmCy3 and 1200YmCy3; Cambio, Cambridge, United Kingdom) was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol to detect the X or Y chromosomes. All fluorescent signal obtained after immunocytochemistry had disappeared after FISH. To make sure that remaining signal from immunocytochemistry is not mistaken for a FISH signal, the color of the fluorescent dye for FISH differs from the color of the fluorescent dye coupled to the second antibody that was used to visualize ubi-H2A or Rad18Sc. If a specific signal was not obtained, the procedure was performed a second time, and this always resulted in a positive signal in the majority of nuclei. The specificity of hybridization was confirmed by using male meiotic spread nucleus preparations; a positive signal colocalized with the XY body of pachytene spermatocytes (not shown). Since the X and Y chromosome probes are labeled with the same fluorescent dye and both probes were used on the same slide in subsequent experiments (first the X chromosome probe and then the Y chromosome probe), some X-chromosomal signal remains visible after the second FISH with the Y-chromosomal probe.
To localize telomeres, a TRITC-labeled peptide nucleic acid probe directed against mouse telomeres (a gift from M. Zijlmans, Rotterdam, The Netherlands) was used to identify telomeres in spread nuclei of spermatocytes. Meiotic spread nucleus preparations were denatured in 70% (vol/vol) deionized formamide in 2x SSC at 72°C for 2.5 min, followed by dehydration with ethanol. Slides were air dried, and 20 µl of denatured probe (0.3 µg/ml) in hybridization mix (70% [vol/vol] deionized formamide, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.0], 0.25% [wt/vol] blocking reagent [DuPont/NEN, Boston, Mass.; stock of 1% {wt/vol} in 40 mM Tris-HCl {pH 7.0}]) was applied. Hybridization was carried out under a coverslip in a humid chamber for 2 h in the dark at room temperature, followed by sequential washing in 70% (vol/vol) formamide-10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0)-0.1% (wt/vol) BSA (twice for 15 min each) and 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.0)-0.15 M NaCl-0.08% (vol/vol) Tween 20 (three times for 5 min each). Subsequently, immunocytochemistry with the anti-ubi-H2A monoclonal antibody was carried out as described above. Digital images were obtained and processed as described above. FISH images were combined with immunocytochemical images by using Adobe Photoshop software, and alignment was obtained by alignment of nonspecific signals present in both images. In addition, in some cases, the red fluorescent FISH signal was converted to white to obtain better contrast.
Immunohistochemistry. Kidney and liver tissues were isolated from male and female adult rats (Wistar), fixed in phosphate-buffered formalin (30 mM NaH2PO4, 45 mM Na2HPO4, 4% [vol/vol] formaldehyde [pH 6.8]) for 6 to 18 h at 4°C, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 8 µm were collected on 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (Sigma)-coated slides and dried overnight. After deparaffinization, endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation in 3% (vol/vol) H2O2 for 20 min, followed by a rinse with tap water. The slides were then incubated for 20 min in a microwave oven at 1,000 W in 0.01 M citric acid, pH 6.0. The slides were allowed to cool and washed with distilled water and PBS. The slides were blocked for 20 min in PBS with 0.5% (wt/vol) BSA and 0.5% (wt/vol) nonfat milk and incubated with anti-ubi-H2A (diluted 1:10 in 10% BSA in PBS) overnight at room temperature. Subsequently, the slides were washed in PBS and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with the second antibody (biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody; DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark), which was diluted 1:200 in PBS containing 2% (vol/vol) normal goat serum. The antibody-antigen complexes were detected by incubation for 30 min with avidin-biotin complex reagent (DAKO) according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer, followed by staining with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride metal concentrate (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.), counterstaining with hematoxylin, and mounting.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
ubi-H2A marks the Barr body in female somatic cells. The XY body is transcriptionally silent, and the present results suggest that ubiquitinated H2A could be a general feature of inactive chromatin domains. In female somatic cells, one of the two X chromosomes becomes inactivated to accomplish dosage compensation. In 1949 the inactive X chromosome in female somatic cells was recognized for the first time and named the Barr body (3). We studied the accumulation of ubi-H2A in male and female somatic cells to determine whether ubi-H2A localized to the Barr body. Immunohistochemical staining of kidney sections from adult male and female rats revealed a marked nuclear spot of ubi-H2A accumulation only in female cells (Fig. 2A). In addition, in female liver cells, which contain many polyploid cells, we often observed two spots (Fig. 2B). Also, in spread nucleus preparations of XO, XY (sex reversed), and XX female fetal ovaries (see experiments described below), we observed a single ubi-H2A spot exclusively in pregranulosa cells from fetal XX ovaries (Fig. 2C). To verify that this ubi-H2A spot in XX cells marks the Barr body, we performed a sequential double immunocytochemical staining of XX fetal ovary cells with anti-ubi-H2A, followed by anti-trimethylated H3 lysine 27, a known marker of the inactivated X chromosome during female embryogenesis (36, 41). All ubi-H2A spots colocalized with trimethylated H3 lysine 27 signal (Fig. 2D); some nuclei contained only trimethylated H3 lysine 27 at the inactive X chromosome, and not all nuclei stained positive (not shown).
|
|
|
Another marker of transcriptionally silenced unsynapsed chromatin regions during meiosis is phosphorylated histone H2AX (
-H2AX). This modification occurs in response to DNA double-strand breaks in somatic cells and is also associated with meiotic double-strand breaks (25, 40). Furthermore, it has been shown that accumulation of
-H2AX on the X and Y chromosomes during late zygoytene in mouse spermatocytes is a prerequisite for XY body formation (13). Previously, it had been shown that
-H2AX also accumulates on the partially synapsed 113 bivalent in T/T' mice (25). Triple immunostainings of meiotic nuclei from T/T' mice with anti-
-H2AX, anti-ubi-H2A, and anti-Sycp3 revealed that 113 bivalents that accumulated ubi-H2A also showed increased
-H2AX staining (Fig. 5A). However,
-H2AX accumulation on XY body chromatin as well as on chromatin of the 113 bivalent was often observed in the absence of ubi-H2A (Fig. 5B). This may be due to the fact that
-H2AX accumulates earlier during meiotic prophase and persists longer than ubi-H2A.
|
-H2AX, precedes that of ubi-H2A, and Rad18Sc also remains present in early diplotene nuclei when ubi-H2A staining has disappeared. Overall, the immunofluorescent Rad18Sc signal is more intense than that of ubi-H2A. Therefore, the lack of colocalization of Rad18Sc and ubi-H2A in some nuclei is most likely due to differences in the timing and level of accumulation of the two proteins. Hr6a and Hr6b appear to be less tightly bound to chromatin than Rad18Sc, because we have observed that the protein is partially lost from spread nucleus preparations as determined with an antibody that recognizes both RAD6 homologs (anti-Hr6a/b) (53). In fixed spermatocytes, Hr6a/b is present throughout the nucleus, including the XY body (53). We investigated colocalization of Hr6a/b with ubi-H2A in spread nucleus preparations; the spread nuclei allow identification of the 113 bivalent and also provide access to the anti-IgM antibody required for ubi-H2A localization. We found that in such spread nucleus preparations of pachytene T/T' spermatocytes, Hr6a/b is preferentially retained on synapsed synaptonemal complex axes and shows a more diffuse staining of the chromatin surrounding the unsynapsed XY and 113 bivalent during midpachytene (Fig. 5D). This diffuse chromatin staining increases concomitantly with an increase of the ubi-H2A signal. ubi-H2A accumulates on unsynapsed chromosomal regions in XY and XO oocytes. In XO females, the single X chromosome remains unpaired during meiotic prophase. In XYtdym1 mice, the sex-determining gene Sry is deleted, and therefore all of these animals develop as females (24). In meiotic prophase in embryonic ovaries of XYtdym1 mice, the X and Y chromosomes pair in approximately 19% of the cells, but no XY body-like structure has been observed (49). In pachytene oocytes from these XO and XYtdym1 mice, we found accumulation of ubi-H2A and Rad18Sc in a single subnuclear region in a large fraction of cells (Fig. 6A and B; Table 1). FISH analysis was used to detect the X and Y chromosomes. For Rad18Sc and ubi-H2A, immunoexpression colocalized with the X chromosome signal in approximately 50% of XY pachytene oocyte nuclei (n = 14 for each antibody). In the same two groups of nuclei, the univalent Y chromosome signal colocalized with immunoexpression of Rad18Sc and ubi-H2A when Rad18Sc and ubi-H2A were absent from the X chromosome. In XO oocytes, Rad18Sc immunoexpression, when present, colocalized with the X chromosome FISH signal (not shown). In some nuclei, the X and Y chromosomes are partially synapsed. In this situation, immunoexpression covered both sex chromosomes or mainly localized to the X chromosome (Fig. 6A). In one nucleus with X and Y clearly separated, we observed accumulation of ubi-H2A on both sex chromosomes (not shown). The absence of Rad18Sc or ubi-H2A from sex chromosomes appeared to correlate with heterologous synapsis or self-synapsis (Fig. 6A, right panel, and B, left panel). A minority of nuclei with unsynapsed sequences showed an absence of Rad18Sc or ubi-H2A accumulation (Fig. 6B, right panel). Local accumulation of Rad18Sc and ubi-H2A is rarely detected in XX oocytes. If present, the signal covers chromatin that shows aberrant synaptonemal complex patterns indicating partial synapsis (Fig. 6C). Double immunostaining of XO and XY oocytes with anti-ubi-H2A and anti-Rad18Sc showed the Rad18Sc signal in a larger percentage of the nuclei (Table 1), but ubi-H2A always colocalized with Rad18Sc.
|
|
-H2AX was observed (Fig. 7C). Based on
-H2AX accumulation as a marker for transcriptional silencing, it appears that the X or Y chromosome or both chromosomes do not undergo silencing in all pachytene XY oocytes (Table 1).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present study, we observed accumulation of ubi-H2A on the Barr body. It has been shown that a general deubiquitination of histones precedes mitosis, followed by reubiquitination in the daughter cells (28, 55). This may explain why, in the present experiments, a portion of the nuclei showed no Barr body-associated ubi-H2A accumulation. Inactivation of one of the two X chromosomes in female somatic cells during embryonic development requires a functional Xist locus. However, Xist function is not essential for inactivation of X and Y chromosomes in male meiotic prophase (50). Therefore, the mechanisms of Barr body formation and XY body formation are essentially different. Increased methylation of H3 at lysine 27 is a relatively early event in somatic X chromosome inactivation, and recruitment of the methylase requires Xist function (36). Here we show that XY body formation is not accompanied by H3 lysine 27 trimethylation. However, subsequent parts of the X and XY inactivation mechanisms may still overlap. For example, macroH2A1 variants are enriched in both the Barr body and the XY body (7, 17).
In the XY bodies of mouse spermatocytes, ubiquitination of H2A appears to be a relatively late event compared to accumulation of
-H2AX. This may indicate that ubi-H2A is not involved in the formation of silent chromatin but rather is involved in maintenance of an inactive chromatin state.
We also found increased ubiquitination of H2A at silent chromatin regions of (near) telomeric sites in late pachytene and early diplotene spermatocyte nuclei. Focal sites of ubi-H2A formation in other unidentified regions of the nuclei are also apparent. ubi-H2A marks several regions of silent chromatin, although it needs to be emphasized that not all silent chromatin carries the ubi-H2A mark. It will be of interest to study the relationship between H2A ubiquitination and histone modifications other than the ones investigated here, to obtain more insight into possible roles of H2A ubiquitination in regulation of the histone code in vertebrates.
In this report we show that Hr6a/b and Rad18Sc, an ubiquitin ligase that can associate with HR6a/b, colocalize with ubi-H2A in the XY bodies of meiotic cells. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that Hr6a/b may ubiquitinate H2A in the XY body, but it is not expected that Rad18Sc functions as an E3 for H2A ubiquitination. In yeast, mutation of RAD18 does not lead to defects in histone ubiquitination (46). Rather, RAD18 is though to function specifically in replicative damage bypass, a mechanism that allows replication of damaged DNA. Based on these findings for yeast, functional involvement of Rad18Sc in histone ubiquitination in mouse is not expected, but formally it cannot be excluded. However, it appears more likely that Hr6a/b together with Rad18Sc acts to ubiquitinate an as-yet-unknown protein substrate, which might be functionally involved in maintenance of silencing of unpaired DNA, as described below.
The present findings show a reduced level of RNA polymerase II and increased accumulation of the XY body markers
-H2AX, Rad18Sc, and ubi-H2A on unsynapsed chromatin regions in spermatocytes and oocytes. We conclude that meiotic prophase cells are capable of detecting unpaired chromatin regions and that this activates a mechanism leading to transcriptional silencing.
MSUD in mammalian meiosis. Recent data point to the existence of a mechanism that leads to meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA (MSUD) in Neurospora crassa (42, 43) and Caenorhabditis elegans (4), which may have evolved as part of a more general genome surveillance system. During meiotic prophase, mobile or foreign DNA (transposon or virus) or translocated chromosome regions can be recognized, because these sequences will not have or find a pairing partner. The capacity of cells to detect unpaired DNA can be viewed as a means to trace and silence such DNA. For C. elegans, it has been shown that multiple copies of a transgene are often silenced during meiosis (20). In addition, the X chromosome of C. elegans males (XO) is silenced during meiotic prophase, and an epigenetic modification is maintained as an imprint during fertilization and subsequent embryo development (4, 21). It appears that MSUD has been adapted to cope with the normal presence of a single sex chromosome in male C. elegans meiosis.
Here we provide evidence that MSUD also occurs during male and female meiosis in mice. This sheds new light on the evolutionary origin of the XY body. During meiotic prophase, the X and Y chromosomes require specialized mechanisms to ensure that they pair and recombine, but only in the pseudoautosomal regions. We suggest that formation of the mammalian XY body, in essence, represents MSUD.
Early detailed investigations of the meiotic behavior of translocation chromosomes in mouse and human have shown that unsynapsed regions become included in the heterochromatic XY body in pachytene spermatocytes, suggesting transcriptional inactivation (see references 10 and 14 and references therein). However, such aberrant XY bodies show some residual transcriptional activity that is not present in normal XY bodies (44), which may signify that silencing of the X and Y chromosomes precedes silencing of other unpaired chromatin regions or is more effective, or both.
Since we have shown in this report that transcriptional inactivation of the 113 bivalent in T/T' mouse spermatocytes depends on the degree of asynapsis, there may be a threshold length of unpaired DNA that is required to activate MSUD. In addition, unpaired chromatin regions undergo heterologous synapsis, which appears to lead to an escape from MSUD in the male as well as the female models used here. In N. crassa, MSUD occurs at the single-gene level and requires components of the RNA interference machinery (19). Barr body and XY body formation might require noncoding RNAs, derived from the Xist locus to initiate Barr body formation and from an unknown site for XY body formation.
The XY body and the Barr body have recently been shown to be functionally related in terms of a father-to-daughter relationship. Meiotic inactivation of the paternal X (Xp) in mouse spermatogenesis generates an epigenetic imprint that is carried on to the next generation, as evidenced by preferential inactivation of Xp in early female mouse embryos, before onset of random X inactivation (18, 26, 30). From this perspective, it will be of interest to study H2A ubiquitination during early embryonic development.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by the Dutch Science Foundation (NWO) through GB-MW (Medical Sciences) and by the Dutch Cancer Society (grant EUR 99-2003).
Our finding that unsynapsed chromosomal regions are transcriptionally silenced during pachytene in male and female meiosis has also recently been reported by others (J. Turner et al., Nat. Genet. 10.1038/ng1484, 5 December 2004 [Online].).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bailly, V., J. Lamb, P. Sung, S. Prakash, and L. Prakash. 1994. Specific complex formation between yeast RAD6 and RAD18 proteins: a potential mechanism for targeting RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating activity to DNA damage sites. Genes Dev. 8:811-820.
3. Barr, M. L., and E. G. Bertram. 1949. A morphological distinction between neurones of the male and female, and the behaviour of the nucleolar satellite during accelerated nucleoprotein synthesis. Nature 163:676-677.
4. Bean, C. J., C. E. Schaner, and W. G. Kelly. 2004. Meiotic pairing and imprinted X chromatin assembly in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Genet. 36:100-105.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Briggs, S. D., T. Xiao, Z. W. Sun, J. A. Caldwell, J. Shabanowitz, D. F. Hunt, C. D. Allis, and B. D. Strahl. 2002. Gene silencing: trans-histone regulatory pathway in chromatin. Nature 418:498.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Chen, H. Y., J. M. Sun, Y. Zhang, J. R. Davie, and M. L. Meistrich. 1998. Ubiquitination of histone H3 in elongating spermatids of rat testes. J. Biol. Chem. 273:13165-13169.
7. Costanzi, C., and J. R. Pehrson. 1998. Histone macroH2A1 is concentrated in the inactive X chromosome of female mammals. Nature 393:599-601.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Daniel, J. A., M. S. Torok, Z. W. Sun, D. Schieltz, C. D. Allis, J. R. Yates III, and P. A. Grant. 2004. Deubiquitination of histone H2B by a yeast acetyltransferase complex regulates transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 279:1867-1871.
9. Davie, J. R. 1982. Two-dimensional gel systems for rapid histone analysis for use in minislab polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 120:276-281.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. de Boer, P., and A. Groen. 1974. Fertility and meiotic behavior of male T70H tertiary trisomics of the mouse (Mus musculus): a case of preferential telomeric meiotic pairing in a mammal. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 13:489-510.[Medline]
11. de Boer, P., A. G. Searle, F. A. van der Hoeven, D. G. de Rooij, and C. V. Beechey. 1986. Male pachytene pairing in single and double translocation heterozygotes and spermatogenic impairment in the mouse. Chromosoma 93:326-336.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Dover, J., J. Schneider, M. A. Boateng, A. Wood, K. Dean, M. Johnston, and A. Shilatifard. 2002. Methylation of histone H3 by COMPASS requires ubiquitination of histone H2B by RAD6. J. Biol. Chem. 277:28368-28371.
13. Fernandez-Capetillo, O., S. K. Mahadevaiah, A. Celeste, P. J. Romanienko, R. D. Camerini-Otero, W. M. Bonner, K. Manova, P. Burgoyne, and A. Nussenzweig. 2003. H2AX is required for chromatin remodeling and inactivation of sex chromosomes in male mouse meiosis. Dev. Cell 4:497-508.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Guichaoua, M. R., A. de Lanversin, C. Cataldo, D. Delafontaine, C. Alasia, M. Fraterno, P. Terriou, A. Stahl, and J. M. Luciani. 1991. Three dimensional reconstruction of human pachytene spermatocyte nuclei of a 17;21 reciprocal translocation carrier: study of XY-autosome relationships. Hum. Genet. 87:709-715.[Medline]
15. Henry, K. W., A. Wyce, W. S. Lo, L. J. Duggan, N. C. Emre, C. F. Kao, L. Pillus, A. Shilatifard, M. A. Osley, and S. L. Berger. 2003. Transcriptional activation via sequential histone H2B ubiquitylation and deubiquitylation, mediated by SAGA-associated Ubp8. Genes Dev. 17:2648-2663.
16. Heyting, C. 1996. Synaptonemal complexes: structure and function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8:389-396.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Hoyer-Fender, S., C. Costanzi, and J. R. Pehrson. 2000. Histone macroH2A1.2 is concentrated in the XY-body by the early pachytene stage of spermatogenesis. Exp. Cell Res. 258:254-260.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Huynh, K. D., and J. T. Lee. 2003. Inheritance of a pre-inactivated paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Nature 426:857-862.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Hynes, M. J., and R. B. Todd. 2003. Detection of unpaired DNA at meiosis results in RNA-mediated silencing. Bioessays 25:99-103.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Kelly, W. G., and A. Fire. 1998. Chromatin silencing and the maintenance of a functional germline in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 125:2451-2456.[Abstract]
21. Kelly, W. G., C. E. Schaner, A. F. Dernburg, M. H. Lee, S. K. Kim, A. M. Villeneuve, and V. Reinke. 2002. X-chromosome silencing in the germline of C. elegans. Development 129:479-492.
22. Lammers, J. H., H. H. Offenberg, M. van Aalderen, A. C. Vink, A. J. Dietrich, and C. Heyting. 1994. The gene encoding a major component of the lateral elements of synaptonemal complexes of the rat is related to X-linked lymphocyte-regulated genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1137-1146.
23. Lawrence, C. 1994. The RAD6 repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: what does it do, and how does it do it? Bioessays 16:253-258.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Lovell-Badge, R., and E. Robertson. 1990. XY female mice resulting from a heritable mutation in the primary testis-determining gene, Tdy. Development 109:635-646.[Abstract]
25. Mahadevaiah, S. K., J. M. Turner, F. Baudat, E. P. Rogakou, P. de Boer, J. Blanco-Rodriguez, M. Jasin, S. Keeney, W. M. Bonner, and P. S. Burgoyne. 2001. Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis. Nat. Genet. 27:271-276.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Mak, W., T. B. Nesterova, M. de Napoles, R. Appanah, S. Yamanaka, A. P. Otte, and N. Brockdorff. 2004. Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Science 303:666-669.
27. Matsui, S., A. A. Sandberg, S. Negoro, B. K. Seon, and G. Goldstein. 1982. Isopeptidase: a novel eukaryotic enzyme that cleaves isopeptide bonds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79:1535-1539.
28. Matsui, S. I., B. K. Seon, and A. A. Sandberg. 1979. Disappearance of a structural chromatin protein A24 in mitosis: implications for molecular basis of chromatin condensation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:6386-6390.
29. Monesi, V. 1965. Differential rate of ribonucleic acid synthesis in the autosomes and sex chromosomes during male meiosis in the mouse. Chromosoma 17:11-21.[Medline]
30. Okamoto, I., A. P. Otte, C. D. Allis, D. Reinberg, and E. Heard. 2004. Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development. Science 303:644-649.
31. Peters, A. H., S. Kubicek, K. Mechtler, R. J. O'Sullivan, A. A. Derijck, L. Perez-Burgos, A. Kohlmaier, S. Opravil, M. Tachibana, Y. Shinkai, J. H. Martens, and T. Jenuwein. 2003. Partitioning and plasticity of repressive histone methylation states in mammalian chromatin. Mol. Cell 12:1577-1589.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Peters, A. H., A. W. Plug, and P. de Boer. 1997. Meiosis in carriers of heteromorphic bivalents: sex differences and implications for male fertility. Chromosome Res. 5:313-324.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Peters, A. H., A. W. Plug, M. J. van Vugt, and P. de Boer. 1997. A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res. 5:66-68.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Pickart, C. M. 2004. Back to the future with ubiquitin. Cell 116:181-190.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Pickart, C. M., and R. E. Cohen. 2004. Proteasomes and their kin: proteases in the machine age. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:177-187.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Plath, K., J. Fang, S. K. Mlynarczyk-Evans, R. Cao, K. A. Worringer, H. Wang, C. C. de la Cruz, A. P. Otte, B. Panning, and Y. Zhang. 2003. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science 300:131-135.
37. Robzyk, K., J. Recht, and M. A. Osley. 2000. Rad6-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2B in yeast. Science 287:501-504.
38. Roest, H. P., W. M. Baarends, J. de Wit, J. W. van Klaveren, E. Wassenaar, J. W. Hoogerbrugge, W. A. van Cappellen, J. H. Hoeijmakers, and J. A. Grootegoed. 2004. The ubiquitin-conjugatin DNA repair enzyme HR6A is a maternal factor essential for early embryonic development in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:5485-5495.
39. Roest, H. P., J. van Klaveren, J. de Wit, C. G. van Gurp, M. H. M. Koken, M. Vermey, J. H. van Roijen, J. T. M. Vreeburg, W. M. Baarends, D. Bootsma, J. A. Grootegoed, and J. H. J. Hoeijmakers. 1996. Inactivation of the HR6B ubiquitin-conjugating DNA repair enzyme in mice causes a defect in spermatogenesis associated with chromatin modification. Cell 86:799-810.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Rogakou, E. P., D. R. Pilch, A. H. Orr, V. S. Ivanova, and W. M. Bonner. 1998. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Biol. Chem. 273:5858-5868.
41. Rougeulle, C., J. Chaumeil, K. Sarma, C. D. Allis, D. Reinberg, P. Avner, and E. Heard. 2004. Differential histone H3 Lys-9 and Lys-27 methylation profiles on the X chromosome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:5475-5484.
42. Shiu, P. K., and R. L. Metzenberg. 2002. Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA: properties, regulation and suppression. Genetics 161:1483-1495.
43. Shiu, P. K., N. B. Raju, D. Zickler, and R. L. Metzenberg. 2001. Meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA. Cell 107:905-916.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Speed, R. M. 1986. Abnormal RNA synthesis in sex vesicles of tertiary trisomic male mice. Chromosoma 93:267-270.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Strahl, B. D., and C. D. Allis. 2000. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403:41-45.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Sun, Z. W., and C. D. Allis. 2002. Ubiquitination of histone H2B regulates H3 methylation and gene silencing in yeast. Nature 418:104-108.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Swerdlow, P. S., T. Schuster, and D. Finley. 1990. A conserved sequence in histone H2A which is a ubiquitination site in higher eucaryotes is not required for growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:4905-4911.
48. Thiriet, C., and P. Albert. 1995. Rapid and effective Western blotting of histones from acid-urea-Triton and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gels: two different approaches depending on the subsequent qualitative or quantitative analysis. Electrophoresis 16:357-361.[CrossRef][Medline]
49. Turner, J. M., S. K. Mahadevaiah, R. Benavente, H. H. Offenberg, C. Heyting, and P. S. Burgoyne. 2000. Analysis of male meiotic "sex body" proteins during XY female meiosis provides new insights into their functions. Chromosoma 109:426-432.[Medline]
50. Turner, J. M., S. K. Mahadevaiah, D. J. Elliott, H. J. Garchon, J. R. Pehrson, R. Jaenisch, and P. S. Burgoyne. 2002. Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation in male mice with targeted disruptions of Xist. J. Cell Sci. 115:4097-4105.
51. van der Laan, R., W. M. Baarends, E. Wassenaar, H. P. Roest, J. H. Hoeijmakers, and J. A. Grootegoed. DNA lesion bypass proteins in spermatogenesis. Int. J. Androl., in press.
52. van der Laan, R., H. Roest, J. Hoogerbrugge, E. Smit, R. Slater, W. Baarends, J. Hoeijmakers, and J. Grootegoed. 2000. Characterization of mRAD18Sc, a mouse homolog of the yeast post-replication repair gene RAD18. Genomics 69:86-94.[CrossRef][Medline]
53. van der Laan, R., E.-J. Uringa, E. Wassenaar, J. W. Hoogerbrugge, E. Sleddens, H. Odijk, H. P. Roest, P. de Boer, J. H. Hoeijmakers, J. A. Grootegoed, and W. M. Baarends. 2004. Ubiquitin ligase Rad18Sc localizes to the XY body and to other chromosomal regions that are unpaired and transcriptionally silenced during male meiotic prophase. J. Cell Sci. 117:5023-5033.
54. Vassilev, A. P., H. H. Rasmussen, E. I. Christensen, S. Nielsen, and J. E. Celis. 1995. The levels of ubiquitinated histone H2A are highly upregulated in transformed human cells: partial colocalization of uH2A clusters and PCNA/cyclin foci in a fraction of cells in S-phase. J. Cell Sci. 108:1205-1215.[Abstract]
55. Wu, R. S., K. W. Kohn, and W. M. Bonner. 1981. Metabolism of ubiquitinated histones. J. Biol. Chem. 256:5916-5920.
56. Zhang, Y. 2003. Transcriptional regulation by histone ubiquitination and deubiquitination. Genes Dev. 17:2733-2740.
This article has been cited by other articles: