Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, March 2005, p. 1821-1829, Vol. 25, No. 5
0270-7306/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.25.5.1821-1829.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Beate Schlierf,1,
Ernst R. Tamm,2
Michael R. Bösl,3 and
Michael Wegner1*
Institut für Biochemie,1 Institut für Anatomie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen,2 Max-Planck-Institut für Neurobiologie, Martinsried, Germany3
Received 29 July 2004/ Accepted 20 November 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The POU domain protein Oct-6 (also known as SCIP or Tst-1) is induced in immature Schwann cells by an axonal signal shortly before 16.5 days postcoitum (dpc) (30). Expression reaches its peak in the consecutive promyelinating stage during early postnatal development, when Schwann cells have established a one-to-one relationship with axons and crucial changes in gene expression occur to prepare for myelination (2, 5, 22). In myelinating Schwann cells, Oct-6 is then gradually extinguished. Oct-6 functions at least partly through induction of Krox-20, the key activator of the myelination program (12).
Deletion of the Oct-6 gene in mice led to an arrest of Schwann cell development at the promyelinating stage (4, 15). The transient nature of this arrest points to the existence of compensatory transcription factors in Schwann cells (10, 15). Compensatory mechanisms are frequently observed between closely related and functionally redundant transcription factors. Within the POU domain family, Oct-6 shows highest similarity to Brn-1, Brn-2, and Brn-4 (29, 43). These class III POU domain proteins share similar biochemical properties (32).
Recent analyses have shown that Schwann cells express Brn-2 with the same developmental profile as Oct-6 (14). In agreement with functional redundancy between Oct-6 and Brn-2, combined deletion prolonged the arrest of Schwann cell differentiation, and transgenic expression of Brn-2 partially rescued the Schwann cell defect in Oct-6-deficient mice. However, functional redundancy was not complete, as only Oct-6-deficient mice and not Brn-2-deficient mice exhibited a Schwann cell phenotype. Additionally, a compensatory threefold increase of Brn-2 expression in Oct-6-deficient mice was unable to fully suppress the Schwann cell phenotype (14). It is unclear whether this incomplete functional redundancy results from differences in expression levels or from functional differences between class III POU domain proteins. Brn-1 is the class III POU domain protein with the most divergent DNA-binding and transactivation capacities in vitro (32). Differential functions of class III POU domain proteins might thus be most easily revealed by comparing the function of Oct-6 with that of Brn-1. For that reason, we replaced the Oct-6 gene with the Brn-1 gene and found that Schwann cell development in these knock-in mice proceeded on schedule.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Homozygous mutant mice were generated by intercrosses of Oct-6+/Brn-1 animals. Alternatively, Oct-6+/Brn-1 mice were crossed with Oct-6+/lacZ mice (4) to obtain Oct-6-deficient, mixed heterozygous Oct-6Brn-1/lacZ mice. Genotyping was routinely performed by PCR on genomic DNA obtained from tail tips or, in case of embryos, from yolk sacs. For the Brn-1 knock-in allele, a common upper primer located 310 bp upstream of the start codon (5'-AGC CGG GCG GTG GTG GTG GG-3') and two lower primers located 154 bp (5'-ACG TTC TGC ACT TCG CGG TAC GC-3') and 28 bp (5'-GGT AGG GGT TAG AAG CCG CCG-3') downstream of the start codon in Oct-6 and Brn-1, respectively, were used. PCR was performed in 20-µl reaction mixtures containing standard buffer, 5% dimethyl sulfoxide, and 0.25 µM each primer. The cycling conditions consisted of an initial 3-min denaturing step at 94°C followed by 36 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 60°C, and 30 s at 72°C. A 470-bp fragment was indicative of the wild-type allele, and a 340-bp fragment was indicative of the targeted allele. Primers and PCR conditions for the lacZ knock-in allele have been described previously (4).
Western blotting. Isolated sciatic nerves were directly lysed in loading buffer, which was followed by sonication and heating in a boiling water bath. Samples were loaded onto denaturing sodium dodecyl sulfate-12.5% polyacrylamide gels and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (34). Polyclonal antisera directed against Brn-1 or Oct-6 (1:3,000 dilution) (21, 32) and a monoclonal antibody directed against ß-tubulin (1:2,000 dilution; Sigma) served as primary antibodies, and horseradish peroxidase-coupled protein A served as a secondary detection reagent in Western blots using the ECL detection system (32).
Histological analyses. Sciatic nerves were isolated from perfused mice at various times up to 5 months after birth and placed overnight at 4°C in cacodylate-buffered fixative containing 2.5% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde, and 0.05% picric acid. After overnight washing in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate (pH 7.3), sciatic nerves were postfixed in cacodylate-buffered 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h, dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series, and embedded in Epon resin. For light microscopy, semithin sections (1-µm thickness) were stained with para-phenylene diamine (8) and viewed with a Leica microscope. For electron microscopy, ultrathin sections (50-nm thickness) were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined with a Zeiss EM902 electron microscope. Quantification of myelinating figures compared to promyelinating figures (300 to 600 fibers per nerve) was performed as described previously (14).
Immunohistochemistry. Embryos were obtained from staged pregnancies at 14.5 and 16.5 dpc, and sciatic nerves were obtained from postnatal mice at various ages. After fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, specimens were cryoprotected by overnight incubation at 4°C in 30% sucrose and embedded in optimal cutting temperature medium at 80°C. Frozen sections were prepared at 10-µm thickness and used for immunohistochemistry as described previously (36, 37). The following primary antibodies were used in various combinations: anti-Sox10 guinea pig antiserum (1:2,000 dilution) (36), anti-Brn-1 guinea pig antiserum (1:1,000 dilution), anti-Oct-6 rabbit antiserum (1:1,500 dilution) (34), anti-Krox-20 rabbit antiserum (1:1,000 dilution) (35) anti-myelin basic protein (MBP) mouse monoclonal antibody (1:500 dilution; Chemicon), and anti-myelin protein zero (MPZ) mouse monoclonal antibody (1:10,000 dilution; a gift of J. J. Archelos). Secondary antibodies conjugated to Cy2 and Cy3 immunofluorescent dyes (Dianova) were used for detection. Samples were analyzed and documented by using either a Leica TCS SL confocal microscope or a Leica inverted microscope (DMIRB) equipped with a cooled MicroMax charge-coupled-device camera (Princeton Instruments, Trenton, N.J.).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Analysis of Brn-1 expression in peripheral nerves. Expression of Brn-1 from the knock-in allele was compared with that of the endogenous Oct-6 in the Schwann cell lineage by immunohistochemistry on Oct-6+/Brn-1 embryos. Brn-1 protein was absent in peripheral nerves at 14.5 dpc (Fig. 2A), although Schwann cell precursors were already present along the nerve at this time, as evident from staining with Sox10-specific antibodies (Fig. 2E and F). Brn-1 became detectable at 16.5 dpc in nuclei of immature Schwann cells along the nerves of Oct-6+/Brn-1 mice (Fig. 2B). Its spatiotemporal expression pattern strongly resembled that of the endogenous Oct-6 (Fig. 2C and D). In fact, coimmunohistochemistry performed on peripheral nerves of Oct-6+/Brn-1 embryos at 16.5 dpc with antibodies directed against Oct-6 and Brn-1 yielded a perfect colocalization (Fig. 2, compare panels B and D).
|
|
|
|
Expression in the sciatic nerve was also analyzed for the peripheral MPZ (Fig. 6). Neither visual inspection nor quantification revealed significant differences in the appearance or final number of MPZ-expressing cells in the sciatic nerve between genotypes. Both Oct-6Brn-1/Brn-1 and Oct-6Brn-1/lacZ mice contained comparable numbers of MPZ-expressing cells at all times analyzed (Fig. 6, compare panels B, E, and H and C, F, and I to panels A, D, and G). Additionally, there were no obvious differences in staining intensities between the various genotypes even at early times (Fig. 6A to C). Thus, we found no evidence of altered expression for two differentially and independently regulated myelin proteins in mice with the Brn-1 knock-in allele. This result argues that expression of myelin proteins does not depend on the exact class III POU domain expressed in myelinating Schwann cells.
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
During gene targeting, we did not remove any of the previously mapped hypersensitive sites in the vicinity of the Oct-6 gene, including the Schwann cell-specific enhancer that was previously mapped 12 kb downstream of the open reading frame (22). Our knock-in resembles the previous replacement of Oct-6 with a lacZ reporter (4). As the ß-galactosidase expressed from this lacZ reporter faithfully recapitulated Oct-6 expression (2, 4), Brn-1 expression from this knock-in allele was expected to mimic the endogenous Oct-6 expression. Brn-1 expression started at the same time as endogenous Oct-6 expression, implying that it was dependent as much on axonal contact as Oct-6 expression (30). Furthermore, Brn-1 expression was extinguished in myelinating Schwann cells. It has previously been shown that Oct-6 is responsible for its own down-regulation in myelinating Schwann cells (16). As Brn-1 expression terminated with kinetics similar to that of Oct-6, even in Oct-6Brn-1/Brn-1 animals, Brn-1 must be capable of down-regulating its own expression from the Oct-6 locus.
Myelination in animals carrying the Brn-1 knock-in allele was indistinguishable from that of wild-type mice. Previous results had shown that amounts of both MBP and MPZ were dramatically decreased in Oct-6-deficient Schwann cells throughout the first 2 weeks of postnatal development (4, 10, 15). In sciatic nerves of Oct-6Brn-1/Brn-1 animals, however, both the number of annular structures positive for either MBP or MPZ as well as their staining intensity were normal. Oct-6 does not directly regulate expression of these myelin genes. Rather, Oct-6 activates Krox-20 expression (12), which in turn is responsible for the induction of myelin gene expression (26). Krox-20 expression was also normally activated by Brn-1 in Schwann cells.
As myelin gene expression is not the only criterion for myelination, we also studied formation and structure of myelin sheaths. Again, we failed to detect any significant abnormalities in animals carrying the Brn-1 knock-in allele. Quantification confirmed that the transformation of promyelinating figures to myelinating figures was completely on schedule in the postnatal sciatic nerve. Myelin sheath thickness and compaction was as normal as the basal lamina. Thus, Brn-1 is capable of efficiently driving Schwann cell myelination when expressed from the Oct-6 locus.
Even more surprisingly, a single copy of the Brn-1 knock-in allele on an otherwise Oct-6-deficient background (Oct-6lacZ/Brn-1 animals) was sufficient to retain wild-type levels and kinetics of peripheral nerve myelination. Previous studies on a hypomorphic Oct-6 allele had shown that once below 50% of wild-type levels, the amount of Oct-6 is rate limiting for myelination (10). Our results with Oct-6lacZ/Brn-1 animals are therefore strongly indicative of a near-complete equivalency of Brn-1 and Oct-6 during Schwann cell development.
This finding has implications for the previously observed partial redundancy between Oct-6 and Brn-2 during Schwann cell development (14). We consider it more likely that different levels of expression are responsible for the different impact of both proteins on Schwann cell development rather than fundamentally different biological activities. We have previously proposed a similar model for the role of the related high-mobility-group domain transcription factors Sox8 and Sox10 during terminal differentiation of oligodendrocytes (36).
Our results might also be helpful in understanding the role of class III POU domains during oligodendrocyte development. Promyelinating oligodendrocytes express Oct-6, Brn-2, and Brn-1 (7, 32). If we assume that these proteins are functionally redundant in oligodendrocytes as well, it follows that the loss of each of these class III POU domain proteins is likely to be tolerated and compensated for by the remaining two proteins. Analyses of single knockouts for Oct-6 and Brn-2 support such an assumption (4, 15, 31). Furthermore, redundancy between class III POU domain proteins is not unheard of in the central nervous system and has been shown to exist between Brn-1 and Brn-2 during production, migration, and positioning of cortical neurons (23, 38).
Functional similarities between Oct-6 and Brn-1 per se might not be unexpected given the close relationship between these two proteins. A functional overlap had even been shown between Oct-6 and the much-less-related POU domain protein Skn-1 during differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes (1). However, given the fact that at least some POU domain proteins such as Brn-5 are completely unable to substitute for Oct-6 during Schwann cell development (14), the complete equivalency between Oct-6 and Brn-1 is surprising.
Previous studies have led to the hypothesis that a specific partner code for POU domain proteins and Sox proteins exists (18, 19), with Oct-6 being a partner for Sox10, which is also expressed in Schwann cells and essential for various phases of their development (6, 27). In contrast, Brn-1 appeared to be ineffective as a Sox10 partner (19). How can this differential cooperation with Sox10 be reconciled with the observed equivalency of Brn-1 and Oct-6 during Schwann cell development? In one explanation, cooperation with Sox10 is simply not essential for class III POU domain function during Schwann cell development. However, previous studies on the regulation of Krox-20 expression in Schwann cells are strongly suggestive of regulation by both Oct-6 and Sox10 (11).
Alternatively, Brn-1 might interact with a different Sox partner protein such as Sox4, which is also present in Schwann cells at the right time (40). Closer attention might also be paid to the specific conditions in which cooperativity between POU domain proteins and Sox proteins was recorded. Originally, a composite element from the FGF-4 enhancer was studied in the U138 human astrocytoma cell line (18, 19). Thus, it is possible that the exact nature of the regulatory element as well as the cellular context contribute to the observed partner code. Even if Brn-1 and Sox10 did not cooperate on the FGF-4 enhancer element in Schwann cells, they might do so on Schwann cell-specific promoters. A final answer to this question will have to await the identification of Schwann cell-specific joint target genes for Oct-6 and Sox10 and the analyses of composite conditional mutants in which both Oct-6 and Sox10 are selectively deleted in promyelinating Schwann cells.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was funded by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to M.W. (1326/5-4).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
R.P.F. and B.S. contributed equally. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Arroyo, E. J., J. R. Bermingham, M. G. Rosenfeld, and S. S. Scherer. 1998. Promyelinating Schwann cells express Tst-1/SCIP/Oct-6. J. Neurosci. 18:7891-7902.
3. Avraham, K. B., B. C. Cho, D. Gilbert, H. Fujii, K. Okamoto, T. Shimazaki, T. Ito, H. Shoji, Y. Wakamatsu, H. Kondoh, et al. 1993. Murine chromosomal location of four class III POU transcription factors. Genomics 18:131-133.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Bermingham, J. R., S. S. Scherer, S. O'Connell, E. Arroyo, K. A. Kalla, F. L. Powell, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1996. Tst-1/Oct-6/SCIP regulates a unique step in peripheral myelination and is required for normal respiration. Genes Dev. 10:1751-1762.
5. Blanchard, A. D., A. Sinanan, E. Parmantier, R. Zwart, L. Broos, D. Meijer, C. Meier, K. R. Jessen, and R. Mirsky. 1996. Oct-6 (SCIP/Tst-1) is expressed in Schwann cell precursors, embryonic Schwann cells, and postnatal myelinating Schwann cells: comparison with Oct-1, Krox-20, and Pax-3. J. Neurosci. Res. 46:630-640.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Britsch, S., D. E. Goerich, D. Riethmacher, R. I. Peirano, M. Rossner, K. A. Nave, C. Birchmeier, and M. Wegner. 2001. The transcription factor Sox10 is a key regulator of peripheral glial development. Genes Dev. 15:66-78.
7. Collarini, E. J., R. Kuhn, C. J. Marshall, E. S. Monuki, G. Lemke, and W. D. Richardson. 1992. Down-regulation of the POU transcription factor SCIP is an early event in oligodendrocyte differentiation in vitro. Development 116:193-200.[Abstract]
8. Estable-Puig, J. F., W. C. Bauer, and J. M. Blumberg. 1965. Technical note: paraphenylendiamine staining of osmium-fixed plastic embedded tissue for light and phase microscopy. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 24:531-536.
9. Franz, T., and R. Kothary. 1993. Characterization of the neural crest defect in Splotch (Sp1H) mutant mice using a lacZ transgene. Dev. Brain Res. 72:99-105.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Ghazvini, M., W. Mandemakers, M. Jaegle, M. Piirsoo, S. Driegen, M. Koutsourakis, X. Smit, F. Grosveld, and D. Meijer. 2002. A cell type-specific allele of the POU gene Oct-6 reveals Schwann cell autonomous function in nerve development and regeneration. EMBO J. 21:4612-4620.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Ghislain, J., C. Desmarquet-Trin-Dinh, P. Gilardi-Hebenstreit, P. Charnay, and M. Frain. 2003. Neural crest patterning: autoregulatory and crest-specific elements co-operate for Krox20 transcriptional control. Development 130:941-953.
12. Ghislain, J., C. Desmarquet-Trin-Dinh, M. Jaegle, D. Meijer, P. Charnay, and M. Frain. 2002. Characterisation of cis-acting sequences reveals a biphasic, axon-dependent regulation of Krox20 during Schwann cell development. Development 129:155-166.
13. Hara, Y., A. C. Rovescalli, Y. Kim, and M. Nirenberg. 1992. Structure and evolution of four POU domain genes expressed in mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:3280-3284.
14. Jaegle, M., M. Ghazvini, W. Mandemakers, M. Piirsoo, S. Driegen, F. Levavasseur, S. Raghoenath, F. Grosveld, and D. Meijer. 2003. The POU proteins Brn-2 and Oct-6 share important functions in Schwann cell development. Genes Dev. 17:1380-1391.
15. Jaegle, M., W. Mandemakers, L. Broos, R. Zwart, A. Karis, P. Visser, F. Grosveld, and D. Meijer. 1996. The POU factor Oct-6 and Schwann cell differentiation. Science 273:507-510.[Abstract]
16. Jaegle, M., and D. Meijer. 1998. Role of Oct-6 in Schwann cell differentiation. Microsc. Res. Tech. 41:372-378.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Jessen, K. R., and R. Mirsky. 2002. Signals that determine Schwann cell identity. J. Anat. 200:367-376.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Kuhlbrodt, K., B. Herbarth, E. Sock, J. Enderich, I. Hermans-Borgmeyer, and M. Wegner. 1998. Cooperative function of POU proteins and Sox proteins in glial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273:16050-16057.
19. Kuhlbrodt, K., B. Herbarth, E. Sock, I. Hermans-Borgmeyer, and M. Wegner. 1998. Sox10, a novel transcriptional modulator in glial cells. J. Neurosci. 18:237-250.
20. Lakso, M., J. G. Pichel, J. R. Gorman, B. Sauer, Y. Okamoto, E. Lee, F. W. Alt, and H. Westphal. 1996. Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:5860-5865.
21. Leger, H., E. Sock, K. Renner, F. Grummt, and M. Wegner. 1995. Functional interaction between the POU domain protein Tst-1/Oct-6 and the high-mobility-group protein HMG-I/Y. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3738-3747.[Abstract]
22. Mandemakers, W., R. Zwart, M. Jaegle, E. Walbeehm, P. Visser, F. Grosveld, and D. Meijer. 2000. A distal Schwann cell-specific enhancer mediates axonal regulation of the Oct-6 transcription factor during peripheral nerve development and regeneration. EMBO J. 19:2992-3003.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. McEvilly, R. J., M. O. de Diaz, M. D. Schonemann, F. Hooshmand, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 2002. Transcriptional regulation of cortical neuron migration by POU domain factors. Science 295:1528-1532.
24. Mirsky, R., and K. R. Jessen. 2001. Embryonic and postnatal development of Schwann cells, p. 1-20. In K. R. Jessen and W. D. Richardson (ed.), Glial cell development: basic principles and clinical relevance, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.
25. Monuki, E. S., G. Weinmaster, R. Kuhn, and G. Lemke. 1989. SCIP: a glial POU domain gene regulated by cyclic AMP. Neuron 3:783-793.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Nagarajan, R., J. Svaren, N. Le, T. Araki, M. Watson, and J. Milbrandt. 2001. EGR2 mutations in inherited neuropathies dominant-negatively inhibit myelin gene expression. Neuron 30:355-368.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Peirano, R. I., D. E. Goerich, D. Riethmacher, and M. Wegner. 2000. Protein zero expression is regulated by the glial transcription factor Sox10. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:3198-3209.
28. Renner, K., E. Sock, J. R. Bermingham, and M. Wegner. 1996. Expression of the gene for the POU domain transcription factor Tst-1/Oct6 is regulated by an estrogen-dependent enhancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:4552-4557.
29. Ryan, A. K., and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1997. POU domain family values: flexibility, partnerships, and developmental codes. Genes Dev. 11:1207-1225.
30. Scherer, S. S., D. Wang, R. Kuhn, G. Lemke, L. Wrabetz, and J. Kamholz. 1994. Axons regulate Schwann cell expression of the POU transcription factor SCIP. J. Neurosci. 14:1930-1942.[Abstract]
31. Schoneman, M. D., A. K. Ryan, R. J. McEvilly, S. M. O'Connell, C. A. Arias, K. A. Kalla, P. Li, P. E. Sawchenko, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1995. Development and survival of the endocrine hypothalamus and posterior pituitary gland requires the neuronal POU domain factor Brn-2. Genes Dev. 9:3122-3135.
32. Schreiber, J., J. Enderich, E. Sock, C. Schmidt, C. Richter-Landsberg, and M. Wegner. 1997. Redundancy of class III POU proteins in the oligodendrocyte lineage. J. Biol. Chem. 272:32286-32293.
33. Shy, M. E., Y. Shi, L. Wrabetz, J. Kamholz, and S. S. Scherer. 1996. Axon-Schwann cell interactions regulate the expression of c-jun in Schwann cells. J. Neurosci. Res. 43:511-525.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Sock, E., J. Enderich, M. G. Rosenfeld, and M. Wegner. 1996. Identification of the nuclear localization signal of the POU domain protein Tst-1/Oct6. J. Biol. Chem. 271:17512-17518.
35. Sock, E., H. Leger, K. Kuhlbrodt, J. Schreiber, J. Enderich, C. Richter-Landsberg, and M. Wegner. 1997. Expression of Krox proteins during differentiation of the O2-A progenitor cell line CG-4. J. Neurochem. 68:1911-1919.[Medline]
36. Stolt, C. C., P. Lommes, R. P. Friedrich, and M. Wegner. 2004. Transcription factors Sox8 and Sox10 perform non-equivalent roles during oligodendrocyte development despite functional redundancy. Development 131:2349-2358.
37. Stolt, C. C., P. Lommes, E. Sock, M.-C. Chaboissier, A. Schedl, and M. Wegner. 2003. The Sox9 transcription factor determines glial fate choice in the developing spinal cord. Genes Dev. 17:1677-1689.
38. Sugitani, Y., S. Nakai, O. Minowa, M. Nishi, K. Jishage, H. Kawano, K. Mori, M. Ogawa, and T. Noda. 2002. Brn-1 and Brn-2 share crucial roles in the production and positioning of mouse neocortical neurons. Genes Dev. 16:1760-1765.
39. Topilko, P., M. S. Schneider, G. Levi, V. E. A. Baron, A. B. Chennoufi, T. Seitanidou, C. Babinet, and P. Charnay. 1994. Krox-20 controls myelination in the peripheral nervous system. Nature 371:796-799.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Verheijen, M. H., R. Chrast, P. Burrola, and G. Lemke. 2003. Local regulation of fat metabolism in peripheral nerves. Genes Dev. 17:2450-2464.
41. Wegner, M. 2000. Transcriptional control in myelinating glia: flavors and spices. Glia 31:1-14.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Wegner, M. 2000. Transcriptional control in myelinating glia: the basic recipe. Glia 29:118-123.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Wegner, M., D. W. Drolet, and M. G. Rosenfeld. 1993. POU-domain proteins: structure and function of developmental regulators. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5:488-498.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Zorick, T. S., D. E. Syroid, E. Arroyo, S. S. Scherer, and G. Lemke. 1996. The transcription factors SCIP and Krox-20 mark distinct stages and cell fates in Schwann cell differentiation. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 8:129-145.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|