Previous Article | Next Article 
Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2006, p. 50-62, Vol. 26, No. 1
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.26.1.50-62.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Transactivation of Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor
by the GTPase-Deficient Activated Mutant of G
12
Rashmi N. Kumar,
Ji Hee Ha,
Rangasudhagar Radhakrishnan, and
Danny N. Dhanasekaran*
Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140
Received 12 September 2005/
Accepted 12 October 2005
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
The GTPase-deficient, activated mutant of G
12 (G
12Q229L, or G
12QL) induces neoplastic growth and oncogenic transformation of NIH 3T3 cells. Using microarray analysis, we have previously identified a role for platelet-derived growth factor receptor
(PDGFR
) in G
12-mediated cell growth (R. N. Kumar et al., Cell Biochem. Biophys. 41:63-73, 2004). In the present study, we report that G
12QL stimulates the functional expression of PDGFR
and demonstrate that the expression of PDGFR
by G
12QL is dependent on the small GTPase Rho. Our results indicate that it is cell type independent as the transient expression of G
12QL or the activation of G
12-coupled receptors stimulates the expression of PDGFR
in NIH 3T3 as well as in human astrocytoma 1321N1 cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate the presence of an autocrine loop involving PDGF-A and PDGFR
in G
12QL-transformed cells. Analysis of the functional consequences of the G
12-PDGFR
signaling axis indicates that G
12 stimulates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-AKT signaling pathway through PDGFR. In addition, we show that G
12QL stimulates the phosphorylation of forkhead transcription factor FKHRL1 via AKT in a PDGFR
- and PI3K-dependent manner. Since AKT promotes cell growth by blocking the transcription of antiproliferative genes through the inhibitory phosphorylation of forkhead transcription factors, our results describe for the first time a PDGFR
-dependent signaling pathway involving PI3K-AKT-FKHRL1, regulated by G
12QL in promoting cell growth. Consistent with this view, we demonstrate that the expression of a dominant negative mutant of PDGFR
attenuated G
12-mediated neoplastic transformation of NIH 3T3 cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Heterotrimeric G proteins regulate diverse cellular responses by coupling heptahelical receptors to intracellular effectors (11, 25, 35). Of the different
-subunits that have been analyzed thus far, the
-subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein G12 (G
12) shows the most potent mitogenic and oncogenic activities (5, 35). The initial identification of G
12 as the transforming oncogene in Ewing's sarcoma cell lines indicated the critical role of G
12 in oncogenic signaling (5). Consistent with these observations, serum stimulation or mutational activation of G
12 has been shown to stimulate mitogenic pathways in different cell types in addition to inducing neoplastic transformation of Rat-1a and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (11, 35). NIH 3T3 cells transformed by the GTPase-deficient activated mutant of G
12 (G
12Q229L, or G
12QL) show the characteristic oncogenic phenotype defined by the increased proliferation, anchorage-independent growth, reduced growth factor dependency, attenuation of apoptotic signals, and neoplastic cytoskeletal changes (35). Previously, we have shown that the neoplastic growth of NIH 3T3 cells mediated by the activated mutant G
12 involves the expression several unique genes, including platelet-derived growth factor receptor
(PDGFR
) (25). This finding is of critical interest since the signaling pathways involving PDGFR have been strongly correlated with cell proliferation and neoplastic transformation (18), thus pointing to a possible role of PDGFR
in G
12QL-mediated oncogenic signaling pathways.
The receptor kinases PDGFR
and PDGFRß are activated by dimers of PDGF isoforms, PDGF-A, PDGF-B, PDGF-C, and PDGF-D (18). Distinct homo- or heterodimers of PDGFs activate specific homo- or heterodimers of PDGFR
and PDGFRß in a tissue-specific and context-specific manner (18). The activation of PDGFRs, leading to their dimerization and transphosphorylation at specific tyrosine residues, provides docking sites for different effector molecules such as Shp, phospholipase C-gamma, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) (18). Overexpression of PDGFR
or PDGFRß and the associated autocrine signaling pathways appear to play an etiological role in tumorigenesis and tumorangiogenesis of different neoplasms including basal cell carcinoma (45), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (17), and ovarian cancers (19, 30). It has also been observed that PDGFR, specifically PDGFRß, is transactivated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) stimulated by lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) (20), sphingosine-1 phosphate (2), serotonin (33), and angiotensin II (39). However, the underlying signaling mechanisms and the role of the specific G proteins in mediating such transactivation are not fully understood.
In the present study, we demonstrate that G
12QL stimulates the expression and transactivation of PDGFR
in NIH 3T3 cells. The ability of transiently expressed G
12QL to stimulate the expression of PDGFR
in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells indicates that such a nexus between G
12 and PDGFR
is not restricted to one specific cell type. Our results indicate that the expression of PDGFR
stimulated by G
12QL involves the small GTPase Rho-dependent signaling pathway. We further determine that the transactivation of PDGFR
by G
12QL involves an autocrine signaling loop involving PDGF-A. Transactivation of PDGFR
by G
12 leads to the activation of PI3K and AKT-kinase (AKT), with the resultant inhibitory phosphorylation of forkhead transcription factors such as FKHRL1. This, in turn, leads to a decrease in the binding of FKHRL1 to its response elements. We also show that the coexpression of a dominant negative mutant of PDGFR
inhibits neoplastic transformation of NIH 3T3 cells induced by the activated mutant of G
12. Taken together with the observation that the inhibition of FKHRL1 leads to an increase in cell proliferation and survival (29), our data presented here identify a novel PDGFR-dependent signaling pathway activated by G
12 in promoting neoplastic growth via the PI3K-AKT-FKHRL signaling conduit.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Cell lines, plasmids, and transfection.
Parental NIH 3T3 cells and the previously described pcDNA3-NIH 3T3 and G
12Q229L-NIH 3T3 cell lines were maintained as previously described (44). 1321N1 astrocytoma cells were kindly provided by Stephen Cosenza (Fels Institute, Temple University, PA) and were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Cellgro, NJ) containing 5% fetal bovine serum. A C terminus-truncated dominant negative mutant of PDGFR
in pLXSN2 vector (22) was a kind gift from Andrius Kazlauskas (Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA). The cDNA insert encoding truncated PDGFR
was excised from pLXSM2 vector and shuttled into pcDNA3(+) vector at NotI-BamHI sites. Transient expression of G
12QL and RhoA-N19 in NIH 3T3 cells was carried out by transfecting the cells (0.7 x 106 cells/60-mm dish) with appropriate expression vectors using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Invitrogen Technologies, CA). Transient expression using the adenoviral vectors encoding G
12QL, RhoA-V14, or RhoA-N19 was carried out by infecting cells (0.5 x 106 cells/60-mm dish) with a multiplicity of infection of viral particles of 600. Transient expression of different constructs in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells was carried out using the Fugene 6 reagent (Roche Diagnostics, IN) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were collected and lysed with modified RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) at 24 h posttransfection.
Construction of the adenoviral vectors expressing G
12QL.
A cDNA insert encoding G
12QL (1,800 bp) was excised from pcDNA3-G
12QL vector (44) using the restriction nucleases KpnI and XbaI. The cohesive ends were blunted and cloned in the EcoRV site of pShuttle-IRES-GFP2 vector (Stratagene, CA) (where IRES is internal ribosome entry site and GFP is green fluorescent protein). The resultant plasmid was linearized using PmeI before it was transformed into Escherichia coli BJ5183, in which the homologous recombination event with the plasmid containing adenoviral backbone takes place. The recombinant clones were selected by analysis of the PacI-digested DNA from these clones. The positive recombinant DNA was amplified by transforming it on a suitable E. coli strain. The recombinant DNA was cut with PacI and then purified before transfection onto AD293 cells for the virus production. Isolation of virus was carried out by following the standard freeze-thaw protocol. In some instances, further amplification of the virus was carried out by infecting AD293 cells. These recombinant adenoviruses were titrated by plaque assay before target cells were infected. Recombinant adenoviral vectors expressing the constitutively activated RhoA-G14V (RhoA-V14) and the dominant negative RhoA-T19N (RhoA-N19) mutants were kindly provided by Aviv Hassid, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN (6).
Cell proliferation assay.
The CyQUANT Cell proliferation assay kit (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR) was used to monitor cell proliferation. Equal numbers of cells (5 x 103 cells/well) were grown in 96-well plates for 24 h and then serum starved for 24 h. The cells were then incubated with the CyQUANT reagent as described by the manufacturer, and fluorescence was monitored using a microplate reader with 485-nm excitation and 535-nm emission filters. A reference standard curve was created as described by the manufacturer for converting the sample fluorescence values into cell numbers.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR.
An aliquot of the total RNA (2 µg) was converted into cDNA using a ThermoScript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen Life Technologies, CA). The reverse-transcribed cDNA was subjected to PCR analysis. The following primers were used for the semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR): PDGF-A, 5'-GAGATACCCCGGGAGTTGAT and 3'-CTGTCTCCTCCTCCCGATG; PDGF-B specific, 5'-ATCGCCGAGTGCAAGACG and 3'-TCCGAATGGTCACCCGAG; PDGF-C specific, 5'-ACAAGGAACAGAACGGAGT and 3'-TCAGATACAAATCTTATCCT. The PCR conditions were 2 min of denaturation at 94° followed by cycles of denaturation at 94° for 30 s, annealing at 58° for 1 min, and elongation at 72° for 1 min. To define the optimal number of PCR cycles for linear amplification, PCR products were removed at the end of 20, 24, and 28 cycles. The mouse glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)-specific forward (5'-GTGAAGGTCGGTTGTGAACGG-3') and reverse (5'-GATGCAGGGATGATGTTCTG-3') primers were used as controls. The amplification products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis.
Immunoprecipitation of PDGFR
was carried out by incubating cell lysate protein (1 mg each) with 1 µg of PDGFR
antibodies for 16 h at 4°C, followed by incubation with 20 µl of 50% protein A-Sepharose beads (Amersham Biosciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ) for 2 h at 4°C. After repeated washes with cell lysis buffer, the immunoprecipitated proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes for immunoblot analysis. Immunoblot analyses of lysate or immunoprecipitated proteins were carried out according to previously published procedures (5). Antibodies to G
12 (sc-409), PDGFR
(sc-338), PDGFRß (sc-432), PDGF-A (sc-7958), ROCK-1 (sc-6056), and AKT (sc-1618) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., CA. Antibodies to phospho-FKHRL1-Thr32 (no. 06-952), FKHRL1 (no. 6-951) and phosphotyrosine (clone 4G10, no. 05-321) were purchased from Upstate Signaling Solutions (Charlottesville, VA). Antibodies to GAPDH (no. 4300) and p-AKT Ser473 (no. 9271) were purchased from Ambion, Inc. (Austin, TX) and Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA), respectively. Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse immunoglobulin G and rabbit immunoglobulin G were purchased from Amersham Biosciences UK, Ltd. (Buckinghamshire, England) and Promega (Madison, WI), respectively.
Rho activation assay.
Bacterial expression vector pGEX-2T encoding a glutathione S transferase (GST)-fused Rho-binding domain (GST-RBD) of rhotekin (amino acids 8 to 89) was kindly provided by Gary Bokoch, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA. GTP-bound Rho was precipitated using GST-RBD according to previously published methods (3, 36, 38). Briefly, cells were lysed in Rho-binding buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Igepal CA-630, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, and protease inhibitor cocktail), and the clarified cell lysates were incubated with GST-RBD-bound glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (30 µl of 50% slurry) at 4°C for 20 min. The beads were washed four times with ice-cold Rho-binding buffer and resuspended in Laemmli's sample buffer. The pulled-down Rho-GTP was identified by immunoblot analysis using Rho-A antibodies.
PDGFR
immunocomplex kinase assay.
An immunocomplex kinase assay to monitor the kinase activity of PDGFR
was carried out using previously published methods with appropriate modifications (46). To monitor the autophosphorylating kinase activity of PDGFR
, PDGFR
was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using antibodies to PDGFR
(as described above). After repeated washes, the immunoprecipitates were resuspended in 50 µl of kinase buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2 and 0.2 mM EDTA) and subjected to an auto-kinase assay by incubating them with 20 µM [
-32P]ATP (5,000 cpm/pmol) for 30 min at 30°C. The phosphorylated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography.
p160ROCK immunocomplex assay.
p160ROCK was immunoprecipitated from 50 µg of cell lysates using antibodies to p160ROCK (sc-6056). The immunoprecipitates were washed twice with the lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.6, 0.1% Triton X-100, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 2 µM dithiothreitol [DTT], 1 mM sodium vanadate, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml aprotinin) followed by two washes with reaction buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 20 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM sodium vanadate). The kinase reaction was carried out by resuspending the immunoprecipitates in 40 µl of reaction buffer containing 20 µM [
-32P]ATP (5,000 cpm/pmol) and 5 µg of myelin basic protein (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as a substrate according to previously published procedures (26). The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at 30°C. The phosphorylated myelin basic protein bands were visualized by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography. The radioactive myelin basic protein bands were excised and quantified in a liquid scintillation counter.
Immunocomplex AKT assay.
AKT was immunoprecipitated from 500 µg of cell lysates using antibodies to AKT (sc-1618). The immunoprecipitates were washed twice with the lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 0.1% Triton X-100, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 2 µM DTT, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml aprotinin), followed by two washes with reaction buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 20 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM sodium vanadate). The kinase reaction was carried out by resuspending the immunoprecipitates in 40 µl of reaction buffer containing 20 µM [
-32P]ATP (5,000 cpm/pmol) and 2 µg of purified recombinant FKHR protein (14-343; Upstate, NY) as a substrate. The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 30°C. The phosphorylated FKHR bands were visualized by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography. The radioactive FKHR bands were excised and quantified in a liquid scintillation counter.
PI3K assay.
PI3K assays were carried out according to published procedures (34). Cell lysates were prepared by lysing the cells in PI3K lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, MgCl2, 5 mM, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml aprotinin) for 20 min at 4°C and removing the cell debris by centrifuging at 18,000 x g for 10 min. PDGFR
was immunoprecipitated from 200 µg of lysate protein (as described above). The immunoprecipitates were sequentially washed with PI3K lysis buffer, followed by three washes with PI3K lysis buffer lacking Triton X-100. The PI3K reaction was carried out by resuspending the PDGFR
immunocomplex in 35 µl of PI3K reaction buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.2 mM EDTA) and incubating with 50 µM ATP, 5 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, and 5 µg of phosphotidylinositol plus 5 µg of phosphoserine for 5 min at 25°C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 300 µl of CH3OH · 1 N HCl (1:1). The phosphorylated inositols were separated on a 1% potassium oxalate-coated thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate using CHCl3 · CH3OH · 4 M NH4OH (9:7:2) as the developing solvent (34).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
Nuclear extracts from pcDNA3-and G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells were prepared according to previously published procedures (29). The oligonucleotides used were the following: forward, 5'-TTAAATAAATAAGTAAATAAATAAAC-3'; reverse, 5'-GTTTATTTATTTACTTATTTATTTAA-3'. The annealed double-stranded oligonucleotides (25 pmol) were end labeled with 20 µM [
-32P]ATP (5,000 cpm/pmol) and purified by G-25 spin columns (Amersham Pharmacia, MA). A total of 5 µg of nuclear extracts was mixed with 1 µg of salmon sperm DNA (Gibco BRL, CA) and radiolabeled probes (50,000 cpm) with or without unlabeled competitor probes. For supershift assays, nuclear extracts were preincubated with 10 µg of FKHRL1-antibodies (06-951) from Upstate Signaling Solutions, (Charlottesville, VA) for 30 min at 25°C prior to the labeled probes. DNA-protein complexes were resolved on a 5% nondenaturing PAGE gel in 0.25x TBE buffer (50 mM Tris, 50 mM boric acid, and 1 mM EDTA). The gels were dried and autoradiographed.
Focus formation assay.
An NIH 3T3 cell focus formation assay was carried out as previously described (43). Parental NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with pcDNA3 vectors encoding G
12QL (5 µg) with or without dominant negative PDGFR
(DN-PDGFR
; 5 µg) using the calcium phosphate transfection method. The control group included transfections with empty pcDNA3 vector (10 µg). Transfected NIH 3T3 cells were cultured in the presence of 5% serum, and transformed foci were stained and scored after 14 days.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Activated mutant of G
12 stimulates cell proliferation and PDGFR
expression.
Expression of constitutively activated mutants of G
12 stimulates proliferation in many cell types including NIH 3T3 cells (35). NIH 3T3 cells overexpressing G
12QL (G
12QL-NIH 3T3) show increased proliferation even under reduced serum growth conditions (Fig. 1A). Since our previous transcriptional profiling data of G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells has indicated a role for PDGFR
in G
12QL-mediated oncogenic growth of NIH 3T3 cells (25), we analyzed the expression of PDGFR
in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells. Results from such analyses indicated that the protein levels of PDGFR
are increased by fourfold in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells compared to the pcDNA3-NIH 3T3 vector control cells (Fig. 1B). Next, we examined the possibility that the observed increased expression of PDGFR
was due to the presence of G
12QL and not to the nonspecific phenotype of the transformed or highly proliferating cells. NIH 3T3 cells transformed by activated G
13 (G
13QL) can be used to assess this possibility, since the activated mutant of G
13, which shares 67% amino acid identity with G
12, has been shown to transform NIH 3T3 cells readily through signaling pathways distinctly different from those of G
12 (36). With this view, we analyzed the expression of PDGFR
in NIH 3T3 cells transformed by the activated mutant of G
13. Results from such analysis indicated that the increased expression of PDGFR
is observed only in cells transformed by G
12QL (Fig. 1C). Thus, our results demonstrate that the increased expression of PDGFR
is not a generic function of a transformed or highly proliferating cellular phenotype but, rather, is due to specific pathways activated by G
12QL.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1. Activation of G 12 stimulates the expression of PDGFR in NIH 3T3 cells. (A) G 12QL mediates serum-independent growth of NIH 3T3 cells. Vector control and G 12QL-transformed NIH 3T3 cells (4 x 105) were plated on 100-mm plates. Lysates (100 µg) from these cells were subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to G 12 for the overexpression of G 12QL and also stripped and reprobed with GAPDH to monitor equal loading (top). Proliferation of these cells in serum-free medium was monitored as described under in Materials and Methods (bottom). (B) G 12QL mediates increase in PDGFR expression. Lysates from 24-h serum-starved pcDNA3- and G 12QL-NIH 3T3 cells were subjected to immunoblot analysis using antibodies to PDGFR (top). The expression levels were quantified using Kodak 1D image analysis software. Results are presented as the increase in expression (n-fold) over the vector control cells (mean ± SEM; n = 10). (C) Activated G 12, not G 13, stimulates the expression of PDGFR . pcDNA3-NIH 3T3 cells, G 12QL-NIH 3T3 cells, and G 13QL-NIH 3T3 were plated (1 x 106 cells per 100-mm culture dish) and allowed to grow for 24 h, after which the cells were serum starved for 24 h. Lysates were prepared and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Immunoblot analyses were carried out using anti-PDGFR . Immunoblot analysis was carried out with antibodies to G 12 or G 13 to monitor the expression of the respective -subunits. The blot was stripped and reprobed with GAPDH to monitor equal protein loading. Results are from a representative experiment (n = 3). (D) PDGFR levels increase upon stimulation of WT G 12 (G 12WT) with LPA. pcDNA3-NIH 3T3 cells, G 12QL-NIH 3T3 cells, and G 12WT-NIH 3T3 cells and were plated (1 x 106 cells per 100-mm culture dish) and allowed to grow for 24 h. The cells were then serum starved for 24 h and stimulated with 20 µM LPA. After 6 h, the lysates were prepared and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Immunoblot analyses were carried out using anti-PDGFR . The blot was stripped and reprobed with antibodies to G 12 and GAPDH to monitor G 12 expression and equal protein loading, respectively. Results from a typical (n = 3) experiment are presented. IB, immunoblot.
|
|
We next investigated whether PDGFR
can be stimulated by activation of a specific GPCR that interacts with G
12. Studies from our laboratory have shown that the bioactive phospholipid LPA stimulates the wild-type (WT) G
12 in NIH 3T3 cells (37). Therefore, NIH 3T3 cells stably expressing G
12WT (G
12WT-NIH 3T3) were serum starved for 24 h and stimulated with 20 µM LPA for 6 h. Similarly treated G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells and pcDNA3-NIH 3T3 cells were used as controls. The cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblot analysis using anti-PDGFR
. The same blot was probed with GAPDH antibodies to monitor equal protein loading. The results indicate that the activation of G
12WT by stimulation with LPA leads to an increase in PDGFR
levels (Fig. 1D), comparable to that of mutationally activated G
12. Thus, our results demonstrate that the receptor-mediated activation as well as the mutational activation of G
12 leads to an increase in the expression of PDGFR
.
G
12QL stimulates the expression of PDGFR
through Rho.
We next investigated the signaling mechanism that couples G
12 to PDGFR
expression and associated transactivation. Studies from our laboratory as well as others have shown that G
12 regulates diverse sets of signaling pathways primarily through the activation of the Rho family of GTPases (11). It has been observed that G
12QL stimulates the expression of many different growth-promoting genes through the signaling pathways regulated by the small GTPase Rho (14). In this context, it is interesting that PDGFR
promoter contains several Rho-responsive elements such as NF-
B, GATA, CCAAT, and AP-1 sites (24). Therefore, we examined whether the upregulation and subsequent transactivation of PDGFR
by G
12QL involved a Rho-dependent signaling pathway. G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells were treated with 10 µM Y27632, an inhibitor of the Rho effector kinase p160ROCK for 16 h (conditions which effectively block the p160ROCK enzymatic activity [23]), and the expression as well as the phosphorylation levels PDGFR
was monitored. The ability of Y27632 to inhibit p160ROCK in these lysates was also monitored using an in vitro p160ROCK assay. Results indicated that Y26732 treatment completely inhibited a G
12QL-mediated increase in PDGFR
levels (Fig. 2A), thus pointing to a role for the Rho-p160ROCK signaling pathway in the transactivation of PDGFR
by G
12QL.
Based on the results presented here, it can be inferred that Rho is downstream of G
12 in mediating the increased expression of PDGFR
. To further establish that the expression of PDGFR
stimulated by G
12QL involves Rho, we investigated whether the coexpression of a dominant negative inhibitory mutant of RhoA (RhoA-N19) inhibits G
12QL-mediated increased expression of PDGFR
and, if so, whether the expression of an activated mutant of Rho (RhoA-V12) increases the expression of PDGFR
similar to that of G
12. We carried out such an analysis by transiently expressing the activated mutant of RhoA-V12 in NIH 3T3 cells using adenoviral vectors. NIH 3T3 cells were infected with adenoviral vectors encoding G
12QL, RhoA-N19, G
12QL+RhoA-N19, RhoA-V12, or empty vector for 24 h, and the expression of PDGFR
was monitored using immunoblot analysis. The inhibitory role of RhoA-N19 and the stimulatory role of RhoA-V12 were monitored by the activated Rho-GTP binding assay using GST-RBD (3, 36, 38). Results indicated that the coexpression of RhoA-N19 blunted the ability of G
12QL to stimulate the expression of PDGFR
(Fig. 2B, lane 2 versus lane 4), further validating the involvement of Rho in G
12-mediated expression of PDGFR
. It should be noted here that the dominant negative mutants of other small GTPases such as Ras-N17, Rac-N17, and CDC42-N17 failed to produce such attenuation of G
12QL-mediated enhanced expression of PDGFR
(data not shown). If Rho is involved in G
12QL-mediated expression of PDGFR
, the expression of a constitutively activated mutant of Rho should enhance the expression of PDGFR
similar to that of G
12QL. In accordance with this assumption, the transient expression of the activated mutant of RhoA in these cells stimulated the expression of PDGFR
similar to that of G
12QL (Fig. 2B, lane 2 versus lane 5). Together, these findings establish that G
12QL stimulates the expression of PDGFR
via a Rho-mediated signaling pathway.
Activated mutant of G
12 stimulates the activity of PDGFR
.
Activation of PDGFR
involves ligand-dependent dimerization of the receptor tyrosine kinase followed by the transphosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues (18). Therefore, we sought to investigate whether the G
12QL-upregulated PDGFR
undergoes such activation. Analyses of the expression levels and the tyrosine phosphorylation profiles of PDGFR
in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells indicated that G
12QL stimulated the expression as well as phosphorylation of PDGFR
in these cells (Fig. 3A). The phosphorylation levels of PDGFR
in relation to its expression levels were increased by 60% ± 9% (mean ± standard error of the mean [SEM]; n =6) over control values (P = 0.01). Since previous studies have shown that such an increase in the phosphorylation levels of PDGFR can elicit mitogenic responses in different cell types (32, 42), our results identify PDGFR
as a novel player in G
12-mediated mitogenic signaling. In this context, it is of interest to analyze whether G
12 also stimulates the expression and activation of closely related PDGFRß. Lysates from cells expressing G
12QL were subjected to parallel immunoblot analysis with antibodies to PDGFR
and PDGFRß. Results from these studies showed that G
12QL had no effect on PDGFR
expression or activity (Fig. 3B), thus clearly establishing the ability of G
12 to specifically stimulate and transactivate PDGFR
(Fig. 3A) and not PDGFRß (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3. G 12 and GPCRs that activate G 12 stimulate the expression and transactivation of PDGFR . (A) G 12QL stimulates the expression and activation of PDGFR . Lysates (500 µg) from G 12QL-NIH 3T3 cells along with vector control were immunoprecipitated with antibodies to PDGFR and subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to P-Tyr. After stripping, the blot was sequentially reprobed with PDGFR and GAPDH. (B) G 12QL does not stimulate the expression of PDGFRß. Lysates (500 µg) from G 12QL-NIH 3T3 cells along with vector control were subjected to immunoprecipitation with antibodies to PDGFRß, followed by immunoblot analysis with antibodies to P-Tyr. The blot was stripped and reprobed with PDGFRß and GAPDH. (C) Transient expression of G 12QL stimulates the expression and transactivation of PDGFR in NIH 3T3 cells. NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with the expression vector pcDNA3 or pcDNA3 encoding G 12QL (8 µg) using Lipofectamine Plus reagent. After 24 h, the lysates (100 µg) from the transfectants were subjected to immunoprecipitation using antibodies to PDGFR , following which an immunoblot analysis was carried out with antibodies to P-Tyr. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antibodies to PDGFR . The blot was further probed with antibodies to G 12 and GAPDH to monitor G 12QL-expression and equal loading, respectively. (D) Transient expression of G 12QL stimulates the expression and transactivation of PDGFR in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells. 1321N1 astrocytoma cells were transfected with vectors encoding G 12QL or pcDNA3 vector (5 µg) using Fugene 6 reagent. After 24 h, the lysates (100 µg) from the transfectants were subjected to immunoprecipitation using antibodies to PDGFR , following which an immunoblot analysis was carried out with antibodies to P-Tyr. The blot was stripped and reprobed with antibodies to PDGFR . The blot was stripped and reprobed with antibodies to G 12 and GAPDH to monitor G 12QL-expression and equal loading, respectively. (E) GPCR ligands, LPA and TRAP, stimulate the expression and transactivation of PDGFR in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells. 1321N1 astrocytoma cells were serum starved for 24 h. After starvation, the cells were stimulated with 20 µM LPA or 5 µM TRAP for 6 h. The cell lysates (100 µg) were subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to P-Tyr. The blot was further reprobed with antibodies to GAPDH to monitor equal loading of proteins. IP, immunoprecipitate; IB, immunoblot.
|
|
To further demonstrate that the expression and activation of PDGFR
are directly in response to the expression of the activated G
12, we transiently expressed G
12QL in NIH 3T3 cells and monitored the expression of PDGFR
. An expression vector containing a cDNA insert encoding G
12QL was transfected into the parental NIH 3T3 cells. The cells were lysed at 48 h posttransfection, and the lysates were examined for the increased expression and phosphorylation by immunoblot analysis using antibodies to PDGFR
and phosphotyrosine (P-Tyr) antibodies, respectively. The immunoblot analysis clearly indicated that G
12QL stimulated the expression of PDGFR
even when it was expressed transiently (Fig. 3C). Reprobing with antibodies to P-Tyr indicated that the tyrosine phosphorylation of PDGFR
is also increased in these cells in response to G
12QL (Fig. 3C).
Next, we investigated whether the observed expression of PDGFR
stimulated by the activated mutant of G
12 is cell type dependent. Since it has been shown that G
12 plays a dominant role in the proliferation of astrocytoma cells (1, 7) and PDGFRs play a critical role in the growth of astrocytomas (12, 27), we analyzed the role of G
12 in the expression of PDGFR
in astrocytoma cell line 1321N1. An activated mutant of G
12 was transiently expressed in astrocytoma cells using pcDNA3 vectors encoding G
12QL for 24 h, and the expression of PDGFR
was monitored using immunoblot analysis. Results indicated that the transient expression of G
12QL in these cells stimulated the expression of PDGFR
(Fig. 3D), further validating the ability of G
12QL to stimulate the expression of PDGFR
in two distinctly different cell types.
Previous studies have shown that thrombin stimulates a mitogenic response in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells by coupling to G
12 (1). Microinjection of antibodies to G
12 blocked the thrombin-stimulated mitogenic response in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells, thus indicating that G
12 is critically required for thrombin-mediated proliferation of these cells (1). It has also been shown that LPA can stimulate the proliferation of these cells by coupling to G
12 (40). Therefore, we investigated whether LPA or thrombin stimulates the expression of PDGFR
in these cells. 1321N1 astrocytoma cells were serum starved for 24 h, following which they were stimulated with 20 µM LPA or 5 µM thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP) for 6 h. Lysates from these cells were subjected to immunoblot analysis using antibodies to PDGFR
and P-Tyr. Results from such analysis indicated that activation of LPA as well as thrombin receptors by their cognate ligands stimulated the expression and tyrosine phosphorylation of PDGFR
in 1321N astrocytoma cells (Fig. 3E). Together with the observation that LPA stimulates the expression of PDGFR
in cells expressing WT G
12, (Fig. 1D), these results demonstrate that GPCRs that link to G
12 stimulate the expression and activation of PDGFR
in two distinctly different cell types.
G
12QL-mediated neoplastic growth involves the PDGF-PDGFR
autocrine loop.
It has been observed that neoplastic transformation often involves the formation of autocrine signaling pathways through which the transformed cells become less dependent on exogenous growth factors (16). Such oncogene-specific autocrine loops involving different receptor tyrosine kinases including PDGFR have been well characterized (9, 41). To determine whether any of the known PDGFR
ligands are involved in such an autocrine signaling loop stimulated by the activated mutant of G
12, we investigated the expression of the known PDGFR
ligands, namely, PDGF-A, PDGF-B, and PDGF-C in G
12QL-expressing NIH 3T3 cells. Using RNAs isolated from G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells along with the pcDNA3-vector controls, semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses were carried out to monitor the expression of the PDGF-A, PDGF-B, or PDGF-C. These results indicate that the expression of PDGF-A is increased in G
12QL cells by twofold in comparison with the vector control cells (Fig. 4A). In addition, a relatively modest increase in the expression of PDGF-C can also be seen with little or no change in the expression of PDGF-B.
To further validate that G
12QL stimulates the expression of PDGF-A that can play a role in the activation of PDGFR
, we analyzed the expression of PDGF-A in the lysates from G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells by immunoblot analysis using antibodies to PDGF-A. Results indicated the increased expression of PDGF-A in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells compared to the vector control cells (Fig. 4B). To establish this further, we carried out a bioassay for PDGFR
-activation in which we analyzed (i) whether the conditioned medium (CM) from G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells stimulates PDGFR
phosphorylation in vector control cells and, if so, (ii) whether the immunodepletion of PDGF-A in this medium abrogates such an effect on PDGFR
phosphorylation. To answer these questions, the medium in which G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells were grown in the absence of serum for 24 h (G
12QL-CM) was collected and added to 24-h serum-starved vector control pcDNA3-NIH 3T3 cells. Following 10 min of incubation with the CM, the lysates from these cells along with experimental control groups were subjected to immunoblot analyses with antibodies to PDGFR
, followed by stripping and reprobing with anti-P-Tyr antibodies. Results indicated that the vector control cells incubated with the CM showed an increase in the phosphorylation levels of PDGFR
(Fig. 4C). When the phosphorylation levels of PDGFR
in vector control cells in response to G
12QL-CM were monitored, the results indicated that there was a twofold increase (normalized to the expression levels; n = 3) in the phosphorylation levels of PDGFR
. However, when PDGF-A in this culture medium was depleted by immunoprecipitation with antibodies to PDGF-A prior to stimulating PDGFR
, the phosphorylation of PDGFR
was drastically reduced (<75%) (Fig. 4C). Taken together (Fig. 4A to C), these findings strongly suggest that G
12QL stimulates an autocrine signaling loop leading to the activation of PDGFR
via PDGF-A.
G
12-transactivated PDGFR stimulates the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway.
In vitro autophosphorylating activity of PDGFR has been widely used as an index of its functional activation (46). To further demonstrate that the expressed receptors are functional, an in vitro immunocomplex auto-kinase assay was carried out using PDGFR
immunoprecipitated with antibodies to PDGFR
. Results from this analysis of the autophosphorylation of PDGFR
indicated that there was an increase in the auto-kinase activity due to the transphosphorylation by PDGFR
in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 5A). PDGFR
stimulates a multitude of downstream effector molecules including PI3K, phospholipase C-gamma, Grb2/Sos1, Stats, Src, and SHP-2 (18). These molecules often integrate with each other in costimulating pathways involved in cell proliferation and cell survival while attenuating apoptotic pathways. While it is possible that the transactivation of PDGFR
by G
12QL generates such multiple signaling inputs, the PDGFR
-mediated activation of a PI3K-AKT signaling pathway is of great interest. It has been known that the pathways regulated by PI3K and AKT stimulate the expression of molecules involved in cell proliferation while downregulating the ones involved in apoptosis (29). Therefore, it can be speculated that G
12QL promotes serum-independent neoplastic cell growth by stimulating PI3K and AKT activities through PDGFR
. To examine such a role for PI3K in the G
12QL-PDGFR signaling alliance, we first determined whether PI3K is associated with PDGFR
and is activated in G
12QL-expressing cells. PDGFR
was immunoprecipitated from G
12QL-NIH 3T3 or the vector control cells using antibodies to PDGFR
and subjected to a PI3K assay using phosphotidylinositol as the substrate. The phosphorylated phospho-inositols were then separated using TLC. An increase in PDGFR
-associated PI3K activity, which can be inhibited by AG1296, a PDGFR-specific inhibitor, was seen in G
12QL cells (Fig. 5B and C). Quantification of the results showed that G
12QL stimulates PI3K activity by threefold (Fig. 5C). More interestingly, this increase could be inhibited strongly (70%) by treating the cells with the PDGFR inhibitor AG1296 (Fig. 5C).
To determine if G
12QL-stimulated PI3K activity results in the activation of AKT, the presence of activated AKT in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells was analyzed. Immunoblot analyses with antibodies to activated phospho-AKT indicated the activation of AKT in these cells (Fig. 6A). Inhibition of AKT activity by treating the cells with the PDGFR inhibitor AG1296 or the PI3K inhibitor Wortmannin clearly suggests that the activation of AKT in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells is PDGFR
and PI3K dependent (Fig. 6A and B). While our results presented here provide evidence that the increased levels of PDGFR
seen in the G
12QL cells contribute to the activation of associated PI3K and the downstream AKT activation, it is possible that G
12QL may also interact with additional signaling pathways in activating PI3K and AKT independent of PDGFR
. The observation that the inhibition of G
12QL-mediated activation of AKT by PDGFR inhibitor was not as complete as in the case of the PI3K inhibitor Wortmannin (70% versus 100%) (Fig. 6B) points to such an interesting possibility.
One of the major mechanisms through which AKT transduces the signals for cell survival and proliferation with a simultaneous decrease in antiproliferative and apoptotic signals is through phosphorylation of the forkhead family of transcription factors (FKHR) (4, 29). Unphosphorylated FKHR translocate to the nucleus and promote the expression of antiproliferative genes such as p27Kip1 (28). However, upon phosphorylation by AKT, they are sequestered in the cytosol and prevented from transcribing both the apoptotic and antiproliferative genes (4, 28, 29). To determine whether the phosphorylated AKT seen in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells can mediate such inhibitory phosphorylation of FKHR, an in vitro kinase assay was performed using recombinant GST-FKHR as a substrate. Results from these experiments indicated that the kinase activity of AKT in phosphorylating FKHR is increased in G
12QL-expressing cells by more than twofold (Fig. 6C). Thus, our results clearly indicate that AKT, activated by G
12QL via the PDGFR-PI3K signaling pathway, can phosphorylate FKHR.
To further demonstrate that inhibitory phosphorylation of forkhead transcription factors occurs in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 transformants in vivo, an immunoblot analysis was carried out using antibodies directed against forkhead transcription factor in rhabdomyosarcoma-like factor 1 (FKHRL1) or FOXO3a, a member of the forkhead family of transcription factors. Lysates from G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells along with vector control cells were examined for the phosphorylation of FKHRL1 by immunoblot analysis using antibodies to phospho-FKHRL1. The immunoblot analysis clearly indicated that the phosphorylation of FKHRL1 is increased in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 7A). To define the role of PI3K and PDGFR
in G
12QL-stimulated phosphorylation of FKHRL1, we examined the phosphorylation levels of FKHRL1 in G
12QL cells with the PI3K inhibitor Wortmannin or the PDGFR inhibitor AG1296. As expected, treatment of cells with Wortmannin completely inhibited the G
12QL-stimulated phosphorylation of FKHRL1 (Fig. 7B). More significantly, treatment of cells with AG1296 drastically decreased the levels of phosphorylation in FKHRL1 (Fig. 7C), similar to its effect on AKT phosphorylation (Fig. 6A and B). Taken together, these results suggest a linear pathway involving PDGFR
, PI3K, and AKT in G
12QL-mediated phosphorylation of FKHRL1.
Increased phosphorylation of FKHRL1 by AKT in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells would suggest that the FKHR are being prevented from binding to their target response elements to transactivate the expression of antiproliferative genes such as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, thereby promoting the accelerated proliferation of these cells (4, 28, 29). In order to demonstrate that such binding of FKHRL1 to its response element is indeed decreased in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells, we carried out an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Nuclear extracts were prepared from both G
12QL-NIH 3T3 and vector control pcDNA3 cells and an in vitro DNA-binding assay was carried out by gel shift analysis using an oligonucleotide probe containing three forkhead responsive elements in tandem. The nucleoprotein complex, as indicated by the specific gel shift band, is greatly reduced in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 7D, lane 3 versus lane 4). FKHRL1 antibody was able to supershift this complex, thus demonstrating the specificity of FKHRL1 binding to its response element (Fig. 7D, lanes 5 and 6). Furthermore, the DNA-protein complex was efficiently dissociated in the presence of the cold competitor (Fig. 7D, lanes 1 and 2). These results clearly indicate that the DNA-binding activity of FKHRL1 is inhibited in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells. Since decreased binding of FKHRL1 to its promoter has been strongly associated with cell proliferation (4, 28, 29), these results point to a hitherto unknown mechanism through which G
12 can promote cell growth.
Dominant negative mutant of PDGFR
inhibits G
12QL-mediated focus formation.
Our results presented here thus far have shown the following: (i) that the activated mutant of G
12 increases the expression as well as the activation of PDGFR
(Fig. 1 to 4), (ii) that activated PDGFR
in turn activates the PI3K/AKT pathway (Fig. 5 and 6), and (iii) that the activated PI3K-AKT pathway stimulates the inhibitory phosphorylation of forkhead transcription factor FKHRL1, a gene that has been previously shown to be involved in the transcription of antiproliferation genes (Fig. 7). Based on these findings, it can be speculated that the increased expression and activation of PDGFR
may play a role in G
12-mediated oncogenic pathways. G
12-transformed fibroblasts, in addition to exhibiting increased proliferation, show other transformed phenotypes such as anchorage-independent cell growth and loss of contact inhibition (5, 35). The focus formation assay has been widely used to define the signaling nodes involved in oncogenic pathways (8, 10). Therefore, we further explored whether PDGFR
plays a role in G
12-mediated focus formation. It has been demonstrated that the deletion of the C terminus of PDGFR
results in a dominant negative phenotype (22). Using this dominant negative mutant of PDGFR
(DN-PDGFR
), we investigated whether functional signaling by PDGFR
is required for G
12QL-mediated focus formation of NIH 3T3 cells. NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with vector containing G
12QL or the empty vector pcDNA3, along with pcDNA3 carrying the truncated mutant of PDGFR
. The numbers of foci were scored 10 to 14 days posttransfection. The results show that while G
12QL induces focus formation in NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 8A and B), the number of foci induced by G
12QL is reduced in the presence of DN-PDGFR
(Fig. 8C). Quantification of results from repeat experiments indicated that the number of foci induced by G
12QL was reduced by 40% in the presence of DN-PDGFR
(Fig. 8D). These results suggest that PDGFR
is involved in G
12QL-mediated loss of contact-inhibited growth of NIH 3T3 cells.
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
To date, several independent studies have confirmed that activated G
12, when transfected, confers transformed phenotypes to fibroblast cell lines (5, 11, 35). In addition, G
12 has been shown to stimulate proliferation in many different cell lines. In addition, similar to other potent oncogenes (16), the activated mutant of G
12 can promote serum-independent cell growth (Fig. 1). These studies have identified that the mitogenic signaling by G
12 involves inputs from multiple signaling pathways emanating from the Ras as well as Rho family of GTPases, JNK, COX2, and ß-catenin (5, 11, 31, 35). While these studies have suggested that G
12 is critically involved in cell growth regulation, the molecular mechanisms involved in this process of transformation or proliferation remain obscure. In this context, our finding that the activation of G
12 stimulates the expression as well as the activation of the potent mitogenic receptor tyrosine kinase PDGFR
is quite significant. These findings gain further significance in light of the observation that thrombin and LPA, the major growth-promoting GPCR ligands in circulating serum that can stimulate G
12, increase the expression and activation of PDGFR
(Fig. 1D and 3E). Together with our observations that the inhibition of PDGFR, even with the suboptimal dose of AG1296 (5 µM), can attenuate the proliferation in G
12QL-NIH 3T3 cells (25) and that the coexpression of a dominant negative mutant of PDGFR
attenuates G
12QL-mediated focus formation of NIH 3T3 cells by 40% (Fig. 8), our results presented here identify PDGFR
as a major signaling channel through which G
12 transmits its mitogenic signals in its multiplex signaling network (Fig. 9).
The study presented here identifies several novel aspects in G
12 signaling. These novel findings include our observations that the regulation of PDGFR
is specific to G
12 and not to the closely related transforming oncogene G
13 (Fig. 1A to C); that LPA and thrombin, which stimulate G
12 (via their cognate receptors), enhance the expression/activation of PDGFR
(Fig. 1D and 3E); that G
12QL-mediated enhanced expression of PDGFR
involves the small GTPase Rho (Fig. 2A and B); that the constitutively activated mutant of Rho can stimulate the expression of PDGFR