,
J. Carlos Villaescusa,3,
Patrizia Di Rosa,1
Luis C. Fernandez-Diaz,2,3
Elena Longobardi,2,3
Roberta Mazzieri,1
Annarita Miccio,4
Nicola Micali,1
Licia Selleri,5
Giuliana Ferrari,2,4 and
Francesco Blasi1,2,3*
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, DIBIT, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milano, Italy,1 Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milano, Italy,2 IFOM, FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, via Adamello 16, Milano 20139, Italy,3 San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy, via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milano, Italy,4 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York 100215
Received 20 February 2006/ Returned for modification 15 April 2006/ Accepted 6 May 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pbx activity is regulated by the TALE proteins Prep1, Prep2, Meis1, Meis2, and Meis3 (4, 6, 8, 10, 19, 21, 27, 49), which form transcriptionally active complexes with Pbx, important during embryonic development (4, 10, 18, 27, 28, 43, 53, 54). DNA-bound Meis/Prep-Pbx complexes, in turn, bind to and modify the activity of other proteins, like anterior clustered or nonclustered Hox proteins, such as Hoxb1, Hox11, Pdx1, and other transcription factors like MyoD (2, 7, 17, 25, 42 50). Hence, they control expression of numerous genes, including Hoxb2, Hoxb1, Hoxa3, Hox11, and glucagon (7, 17, 22, 25, 34, 42, 43), that are required for development and organogenesis. In zebra fish embryos, Meis1 overexpression increases the stability of Pbx (53, 54). Likewise, in mammalian cells, overexpression of Prep1 increases the stability of Pbx1 and Pbx2 by preventing their proteasomal degradation (31). On the other hand, down-regulation of prep1.1 in zebra fish causes an overall reduction of all Pbx proteins (13).
Meis1-deficient mice exhibit an embryonic lethal phenotype (embryonic day 13.5 [E13.5] to 14.5) with major defects in hematopoiesis, angiogenesis, and eye formation (1, 23), while Meis2 (Mrg2) appears to be involved in controlling chick limb outgrowth (9, 36). In Xenopus laevis, Meis1b regulates hindbrain gene expression (32), while ectopic expression of Meis caudalizes neural cell fates (43). Importantly, the expression levels of other TALE proteins have not been assessed in Meis1-deficient models.
Mammals have two Prep genes, Prep1 and Prep2 (4, 19, 21), while zebra fish have three, prep1.1, prep1.2, and prep2 (13). Down-regulation with morpholino antisense oligonucleotides of the prep1.1 gene in zebra fish causes an embryonic lethal phenotype with extensive brain apoptosis, loss of hindbrain rhombomeric segmentation, lack of cartilage differentiation of neural crest cells, pericardial edema, and lack of fins (13). In mice, a null Prep1 mutation results in early lethality (E7.5) (L.C. Fernandez, N. Jenkins, N. Copeland, and F. Blasi, unpublished data), precluding a study of the Prep1 role(s) in later developmental processes.
An insertion of a retroviral vector in the first intron of the Prep1 gene (Prep1i/i) results in a hypomorphic mutation that exhibits variable penetrance and expressivity. Most Prep1i/i embryos die between E17.5 and P0 (see below), although about 1/4 of these escape embryonic lethality. The mice escaping embryonic lethality show T-cell development anomalies (40). In this paper, we show that the Prep1i/i embryonic phenotype recapitulates, at least in part, the Meis1 and Pbx1 phenotypes. Indeed, erythropoiesis and angiogenesis are impaired, with liver hypoplasia, decreased hematocrit, anemia, and delayed erythroid differentiation together with a decrease in capillary formation. Moreover, much like in Meis1 mutants, Prep1i/i embryos also display major eye anomalies. Finally, Prep1i/i embryos exhibit decreased levels of Pbx1, Pbx2, and Meis1 proteins as well as decreased expression of cMyb and Pax6, consistent with the hematopoietic and eye phenotype, respectively. Our data highlight a novel hierarchy wherein Prep1 acts upstream in the network regulating hematopoiesis (and specifically erythropoiesis), angiogenesis, and eye development by controlling the levels of Pbx and Meis proteins.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prep1 targeting. Prep1 targeted mice were generated by gene trapping by Lexikon Genetics, Inc. (The Woodlands, Texas) using a clone isolated from a library of embryonic stem cells (129/SvEvBrd strain) randomly targeted with a retroviral vector (VICTR45) (55). Prep1+/i mice were obtained in the C57BL/6-SV129 strain. Heterozygous mice were backcrossed with wild-type (wt) C57BL/6 for up to 9 generations. All animal handling conformed to regulations of the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of H. S. Raffaele (IACUC permission number 207).
Genotyping of Prep1i/i mice. Southern Blot analysis of EcoRI-digested total DNA from tail biopsy specimens or yolk sacs employed a 132-bp double-stranded Prep1 cDNA probe prepared from full-length Prep-1 cDNA with the forward primer 5'-ATGATGGCGACACAGACGCTAAGTATA-3' and reverse primer 5'-GGGGTCTGAGACTCGATGGGAGGAGGACTC-3'.
The PCR genotyping strategy employed oligonucleotides Prep-R1 and LTR2 (sequences provided below) that amplify a 230-bp fragment in the disrupted allele, while the Prep-F1-Prep-R1 couple amplifies a 300-bp fragment of the wild-type allele. Sequences of oligonucleotides are as follows: Prep-F1, 5'-CCAAGGGCAGTAAGAGAAGCTCTGGAG-3'; Prep-R1 5'-GGAGTGCCAACCATGTTAAGAAGAAGTCCC-3'; LTR2, 5'-CAAAATGGCGTTACTTAAGCTAGCTTGCC-3'.
Nuclear extract preparation and immunoblotting analysis. For Electrophoretic Mobility Shift assays (EMSA) and immunoblotting assays, nuclear (or total) extracts were prepared from dissected mouse embryos and organs at the indicated stages as described previously (3).
EMSA. EMSA were performed with the O-1, Sp1, b2-PH, and b2-PM-PH oligonucleotides, as described previously (3, 4, 17). The oligonucleotide sequences are as follows: O-1, 5'-CACCTGAGAGTGACAGAAGGAGGCAGGGAG-3'; b2-PH, 5'-GGGGCTAAGATTGATCGCCTC-3'; b2-PM-PH, 5'-GGAGCTGTCAGGGGGCTAAGATTGATCGCCTCA-3'; Sp1, 5'-GATCGATCGGGGCGGGGCGATC-3'.
mRNA extraction and QT-PCR from mouse embryos. For quantitative PCR (QT-PCR), total RNA was extracted from single E10.5 embryos with the TRIZOL reagent (Life Technologies) and the guanidine isothiocyanate method (11). The Taqman gene expression assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) was used with predesigned, gene-specific Taqman probe and primer sets and the ABI-Prism 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). The data are standardized to the level of 18S rRNA.
Hematocrit determination. For hematocrit determination, peripheral blood obtained by cardiac puncture from E16.5 embryos was centrifuged in 32 by 0.8 mm Na-heparinized capillary tubes (Hirschmann Laborgerate, Ebenstadt, Germany).
Flow cytometry. Ter119 and CD71 antibodies (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) were used to analyze erythroid subpopulations in fetal liver (FL) (57).
BFU-E assays. Colony assays were carried out by incubating 50,000 Prep1+/+, Prep1+/i, or Prep1i/i FL single-cell suspensions in 1 ml of methylcellulose enriched with erythropoietin (Methocult GF M-3434; Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) in triplicate. The growth of erythroid colonies was quantitated after 10 days (35).
Cultures of allantois. Allantoids from E7.5 to 7.75 embryos were cultured for 18 to 20 h, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, washed, and permeabilized for 30 min as described elsewhere (45). The cultures were stained with a rat anti-mouse PECAM/CD31 (clone Mec 13.3; Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif.) monoclonal antibody, revealed with Cy3 donkey anti-rat secondary antibodies (1:300), and washed, and images were acquired by confocal fluorescence microscopy. The vessel density was blindly measured as the percentage of CD31-stained pixels in identical areas of the central portion of each allantois using Pixel-Counter software (courtesy of M. Mazzieri).
Immunohistochemistry. For immunohistochemistry, E10.5 or E14.5 embryos were fixed, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Deparaffinized sections (7 µm) were incubated with antibody overnight at 4°C, then incubated with biotinylated secondary anti-mouse, -rat, or -rabbit immunoglobulin G (Vectastain ABC kit, Vector Laboratories, Inc.), and detected with the DAB substrate kit for peroxidase or the Vector red alkaline phosphatase substrate kit I (Vector Laboratories, Inc.).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Prep1i/i embryonic phenotype. In agreement with the striking pallor, edema, and smaller liver spot in the majority of embryos, in most E16.5 Prep1i/i embryos, blood smear analyses showed a profound anemia and a relative increase of nucleated cells (not shown), which resulted in a very low hematocrit (13% versus 37% of wt littermates) (Table 2). To test whether this phenotype may be due to a delayed or abnormal differentiation of the erythroid lineage in the FL, we analyzed the expression of Ter119 and CD71 by flow cytometry. This approach identifies five erythroid progenitor subpopulations at differentiation stages from proerythroblasts to reticulocytes (57). In Table 3, the R1 subpopulation (CD71med, Ter119) includes the earliest progenitors, proerythroblasts and early basophilic erythroblasts fall into R2 (CD71high, Ter119low), early and late basophilic erythroblasts in R3 (CD71high, Ter119high), and chromatophilic and ortochromatic erythroblasts in R4 (CD71med, Ter119high) (57). The analysis of E15.5 FL (13 wt or heterozygous versus 10 Prep1i/i) showed, with respect to wt, a general decrease in total FL cells, an increase in early progenitor subpopulations R2 and R3, and a similar decrease in the more differentiated R4 subpopulation (Table 3). Although not large, the differences observed in R2, R3, and R4 were statistically significant. At E16.5, the differences were more marked, although there was more variability (Table 3). The total number of FL cells was lower in Prep1i/i than in the wt. In wt embryos, the majority of more differentiated erythroid progenitors was in the R3 and R4 subpopulations. In the case of the three Prep1i/i embryos, the results were more variable from embryo to embryo, and hence, we present the data for the individual embryos in Table 3. In one embryo, almost all erythroid cells were retained in the R1 subpopulation (i.e., the earliest erythroid progenitors). In a second embryo, about half of the erythroid cells were in the R1 subpopulation (early progenitors) and the other half were in R4. In the third Prep1i/i embryo, instead, most erythroid cells were present in the R4 subpopulation, indicating that they had reached a rather advanced stage of differentiation. Thus, at least two of three Prep1i/i embryos exhibit a variable degree of delay in erythroid differentiation, which may be correlated with different levels of residual Prep1protein. It is interesting that the greatest differences were observed at E16.5, i.e., when a major hematocrit decrease becomes evident (Table 3).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Meis1 homeoprotein has been implicated in the direct regulation of Pax6 during vertebrate lens morphogenesis (58), we tested Meis1 levels in E14.5 developing eyes of wt and Prep1i/i embryos by immunohistochemistry. Meis1 protein was high in the neural retina and low in the lens epithelium (Fig. 5L and N) of wt embryos, while almost totally absent in Prep1i/i embryos (Fig. 5 M and O). Lower levels of Meis1 in the lens versus retina have been previously reported (23). As a result, the decrease of Meis1 in the Prep1i/i neural retina was more evident than in the lens.
Prep1 deficiency almost abolishes Pbx-dependent DNA-binding activity and decreases Pbx and Meis1 protein levels. Pbx proteins bind DNA upon dimerization with Prep and Meis proteins (4, 10). However, nothing is known about the relative contribution of individual Prep or Meis proteins in vivo. In fact, Pbx proteins can dimerize with either Prep or Meis proteins, producing dimers with similar DNA-binding properties. We therefore exploited Prep1i/i embryos to test the contribution of Prep1 to the overall DNA binding activity of Pbx proteins, using EMSA. Nuclear extracts of whole E10.5 Prep1i/i embryos showed almost no DNA binding to oligonucleotide O1 (Fig. 6A), which can bind both Prep1-Pbx and Meis-Pbx dimers (3, 5). The binding to the control Sp1 oligonucleotide, specific for the ubiquitous Sp1 transcription factor (24), was unchanged. Prep1i/i extracts also displayed no or weak binding to oligonucleotides that, in addition, also recognize Pbx-Hox dimers (oligo b2-PH) or Prep/Meis-Pbx-Hox ternary complexes (b2-PM-PH) (16, 17, 25) (Fig. 6B). We then used antibodies to verify the contribution of Prep1 to the above binding activities. In wt as well as Prep1i/i extracts, a supershift was observed with anti-Pan-Pbx or inhibition with specific anti-Prep1 antibodies, indicating that the measured activity was mostly due to Prep1-Pbx dimers (Fig. 6C); no effect was observed with anti-Prep2 antibodies. Thus, Prep1 represents the most abundant, among Prep-Meis family members, DNA binding partner for Pbx. The results shown in Fig. 6A and B also confirm the presence of residual, functional Prep1 in Prep1i/i extracts. When we analyzed extracts from Prep1i/i E14.5 embryonic liver, a site of active hematopoiesis, essentially no DNA-binding activity was observed (Fig. 6D, lanes 5 and 7). In brain (Fig. 6D, lanes 1 and 3) and lung (Fig. 6D, lanes 9 and 11) extracts, a similar result was observed. Competition with specific antibodies revealed that the residual binding activity in Prep1i/i brain nuclear extracts was due to Prep1, Prep2, Pbx1, and Pbx3 (Fig. 6D, lanes 17, 18, 14, and 16, respectively). We conclude that Prep1 is the most abundant partner of Pbx in embryonic DNA-binding activity and that this is profoundly decreased in Prep1i/i embryos.
|
|
MRNA levels of cMyb, some Pbx, and some Meis genes are reduced in Prep1i/i embryos. Quantitative PCR on E10.5 total embryonic RNA demonstrated a statistically significant reduction of several mRNAs (Table 6). Interestingly, while the levels of Pbx1, Pbx2, and Meis1 proteins were decreased in Prep1i/i embryos (Fig. 7), the levels of their mRNAs did not change. These data are in keeping with the absence of Pbx2 proteins from the thymus of adult Prep1i/i mice in the presence of unaltered levels of Pbx2 mRNA (40). However, the levels of Pbx3, Pbx4, Meis2, and Meis3 mRNAs were significantly reduced. Finally, the level of cMyb mRNA was also significantly decreased (Table 6), supporting the immunohistochemistry of Prep1i/i FL (Fig. 2). In conclusion, these data indicate that Prep1 is required for the expression of related TALE proteins and of cMyb.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The hematopoietic phenotype consisted of a dramatic decrease in the number of circulating erythrocytes and a delay in erythroid differentiation. Indeed, E15.5 and E16.5 Prep1i/i FL contained more erythroid progenitors and fewer differentiated cells (Table 3). Deficiency in erythroid progenitors was also shown by the measurement of erythropoietin-dependent colony formation, which uncovered a dramatic deficiency in Prep1i/i FL (Table 4). The presence of Prep1 in FL hematopoietic cells, as shown by its colocalization with cMyb (Fig. 2), and Sca1 (not shown), is consistent with the observed phenotype. FL from Prep1i/i embryos exhibited a drastic decrease of cMyb-positive cells. However, a few cells still exhibited apparently normal levels of cMyb (Fig. 2D and E). This finding is in agreement with the observation that cMyb and Prep1 were colocalized in most but not all FL cells (Fig. 2). Nonetheless, the overall decrease of cMyb can, at least in part, explain the erythroid phenotype (15).
Prep1i/i mice which escape embryonic lethality show a defect in T-cell development, with a decreased number of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, increased apoptosis, decreased proliferation of double-positive thymocytes, and anomalies in
ß and 
T-cell receptor expression, a phenotype reproduced in wt mice transplanted with Prep1i/i FL cells (40). Present data show that, in addition to the lymphoid lineage, Prep1 is also required for the proper development of the erythroid lineage. Whether the lymphoid and erythroid phenotypes derive from anomalies in common stem cell progenitors or from the concomitant roles of Prep1 in different hematopoietic lineages remains to be elucidated.
Angiogenesis was also impaired in Prep1i/i embryos. Indeed, E7.5 to 7.75 Prep1i/i allantois preparations and E10.5 whole embryos showed reduced, thinner, and less-organized capillaries (Fig. 3). These data suggest, therefore, that angiogenic precursors may also be affected by Prep1 deficiency. In fact, Prep1 is present in endothelial precursors, where it colocalizes with CD31 and c-Kit (data not shown) in E14.5 FL. Furthermore, the finding of a decreased microvasculature in Prep1i/i allantois cultures indicates that Prep1i/i embryos have an intrinsic angiogenic defect, which does not simply reflect a decrease in circulating blood cells, and thus is independent from the hematopoietic phenotype.
Another frequent phenotype of Prep1i/i embryos involved eye development (Table 5). In some cases, the eye was not detectable but was found deep inside the head. In most cases, the size of the lens was strongly reduced, similar to the phenotype of Pax6-deficient mice, where no lens induction and anomalies of the neural retina have been reported (48, 52). Prep1 is present in E14.5 neural retina, cornea, and lens epithelium and specifically colocalized with Pax6. Interestingly, Pax6 levels were drastically reduced in the Prep1i/i neural retina, cornea, iris, and lens epithelium (Fig. 5J and K). Pax6 down-regulation may have a critical role in determining the eye phenotype of Prep1i/i embryos, since Pax6 is essential for oculogenesis (20, 29, 48, 52). As Prep1i/i embryos exhibit overall lower levels of Meis1 protein, the Prep1i/i ocular phenotype might be due to reduced Meis1 expression. Previous biochemical and genetic data demonstrated that Meis1 directly regulates Pax6 expression during vertebrate lens morphogenesis (58). Furthermore, the specific 107-bp minimal lens lineage enhancer element contains a functionally essential Meis1 binding site (which potentially could also be a Prep1 site) that directs expression in the prospective mouse lens (58). At this point, our data do not allow us to conclude whether Prep1 directly regulates Pax6 expression in the lens, cornea, and/or neural retina or whether it does so by controlling the levels of Meis1 (Fig. 8). As Prep1 and Meis act by dimerizing with Pbx proteins, it is possible that Pbx also participates in the regulation of Pax6 expression and eye development. While no information is available in the mouse, in Xenopus laevis Pbx has been shown to be required for lens development (39). It is worth noting that the angiogenic, hematopoietic, and eye phenotypes have also been reported in Meis1-deficient embryos (1, 23).
|
The decrease of cMyb-positive cells in Prep1i/i embryos is also consistent with the reported hematopoietic abnormality, as cMyb-deficient embryos fail to produce all of the hematopoietic lineages (12, 15, 30, 37, 51). However, at present, it is not clear whether the Prep1i/i hematopoietic phenotype derives from a direct or indirect effect of Prep1 on cMyb gene expression.
Likewise, the decrease of Pax6 in the eye of Prep1i/i embryos appears to be, at least in part, the cause of the reported eye defect. Understanding whether the Prep1i/i eye abnormality is a direct effect of the regulation of Pax6 gene expression by Prep1 will require further experiments. Nonetheless, the decrease of Pax6 levels in the developing eye of Prep1i/i embryos is well in keeping with the established requirement of Pax6 in eye formation (20, 48, 52).
The Prep1 role in mouse development is epistatic to that of Pbx and Meis genes. The decrease not only of Prep1 but also of Pbx and Meis proteins in Prep1i/i embryos almost abolishes the DNA-binding activity of Meis/Prep-Pbx dimer-specific target sequences. Prep1 deficiency causes a reduction of related family members and TALE partners, such as Pbx1, Pbx2, and Meis1. As the mRNA levels of these proteins is not affected in a statistically significant manner (Table 6), their reduction appears to be at the posttranscriptional level. Likewise, in zebra fish prep1.1 down-regulation reduces the levels of all Pbx proteins (13). Furthermore, in mammalian cells in culture, Prep1 overexpression does not affect Pbx1 and Pbx2 mRNA levels but increases the stability of Pbx1b and Pbx2 by preventing their proteasomal degradation (31). In light of these results, it is likely that, in the absence of Prep1, Pbx proteins are not protected from proteasomal degradation. However, Prep1 deficiency results in a decrease of Pbx3, Pbx4, Meis2, and Meis3 mRNAs in whole E10.5 embryos (Table 6). Thus, Prep1 not only forms transcriptional complexes with Pbx but also hierarchically controls the expression of all Pbx and Meis genes. It will be interesting to analyze whether the levels of Hox genes is also affected in Prep1i/i embryos, as described for zebra fish (13).
We conclude that Prep1 is a master gene that is required for hematopoietic, angiogenic, and eye development, as well as other developmental functions, by controlling the levels of Pbx and Meis TALE proteins and their target genes (Fig. 8). Many of the phenotypes observed in Prep1i/i embryos may be mediated by the concomitant loss of Meis and Pbx partners, therefore resulting in defects closely resembling those of Pbx1 and Meis1 null embryos. Nonetheless, Prep1 undoubtedly also exerts unique functions in vertebrate development, as demonstrated by the presence of unique abnormalities in Prep1i/i versus either Meis- or Pbx-deficient embryos. For example, the lack of Meis1 mainly causes a defect in megakaryocyte production, while in Prep1i/i embryos, erythroid cells are primarily affected. In addition, Prep1 null embryos exhibit very early embryonic lethality (Fernandez et al., unpublished data), while the Pbx and Meis mutants survive in utero until late gestation. Therefore, our studies establish that Prep1, while controlling other TALE partners, also plays unique, selective roles in vertebrate development.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Telethon Foundation Onlus (GGP02031), the Italian Ministry of University and Research (COFIN 2002-2005), and the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC). The experiments performed by N.M. were supported by an AIRC grant to Massimo Crippa. L.S. acknowledges grants from the National Institutes of Health (HD43997) and from the March of Dimes and Birth Defects Foundation (6-FY03-071).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address: Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY 10021. ![]()
These authors equally contributed to this work. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Berkes, C., D. A. Bergstrom, B. H. Penn, K. J. Seaver, P. S. Knoepfler, and S. J. Tapscott. 2004. Pbx marks genes for activation by MyoD indicating a role for a homeodomain protein in establishing myogenic potential. Mol. Cell 14:465-477.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Berthelsen, J., J. Vandekerkhove, and F. Blasi. 1996. Purification and characterization of UEF3, a novel factor involved in the regulation of the urokinase and other AP-1 controlled promoters. J. Biol. Chem. 271:822-3830.
4. Berthelsen, J., V. Zappavigna, E. Ferretti, F. Mavilio, and F. Blasi. 1998. Prep1, a novel partner of Pbx proteins, modifies Pbx-Hox protein cooperativity. EMBO J. 17:1434-1445.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Berthelsen, J., V. Zappavigna, F. Mavilio, and F. Blasi. 1998. Prep1, a novel functional partner of Pbx proteins. EMBO J. 17:1423-1433.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Berthelsen, J., C. Kilstrup-Nielsen, F. Blasi, F. Mavilio, and V. Zappavigna. 1999. The subcellular localization of PBX1 and EXD proteins depends on nuclear import and export signals and is modulated by association with PREP1 and HTH. Genes Dev. 13:946-953.
7. Brendolan, A., E. Ferretti, V. Salsi, K. Moses, S. Quaggin, F. Blasi, M. L. Cleary, and L. Selleri. 2005. A Pbx1-dependent genetic and transcriptional network regulates spleen ontogeny. Development 132:3113-3126.
8. Burglin, T. R. 2005. Homeodomain proteins, p. 179-222. In R. A. Meyers (ed.), Encyclopedia of molecular cell biology and molecular medicine, vol. 6. Wiley-VCH, Hoboken, N.J.
9. Capdevila, J., T. Tsukui, C. Rodriquez Esteban, V. Zappavigna, and J. C. Izpisua Belmonte. 1999. Control of vertebrate limb outgrowth by the proximal factor Meis2 and distal antagonism of BMPs by Gremlin. Mol. Cell 4:839-849.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Chang, C. P., Y. Jacobs, T. Nakamura, N. Jenkins, N. G. Copeland, and M. L. Cleary. 1997. Meis proteins are major in vivo DNA binding partners for wt but not chimeric Pbx proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5679-5687.[Abstract]
11. Chomczynski, P., and N. Sacchi. 1987. Single step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal. Biochem. 162:156-159.[Medline]
12. Creavin, T. 2005. Hematopoiesis: cMyb enters centre stage. Drug Discov. Today 10:381-382.[Medline]
13. De Florian, G., N. Tiso, E. Ferretti, F. Blasi, M. Bortolussi, and F. Argenton. 2004. Prep1.1 has essential and unique genetic functions in hindbrain development and neural crest cells differentiation. Development 131:613-627.
14. Dimartino, J., L. Selleri, D. Traver, M. Firpo, J. Rhee, R. Warnke, S. O'Gorman, I. L. Weissman, and M. L. Cleary. 2001. The Hox cofactor and protoncogene Pbx1 is required for maintenance of definitive hematopoiesis in the fetal liver. Blood 98:618-626.
15. Emambokus, N., A. Vegiopoulos, B. Harman, E. Jenkinson, G. Anderson, and J. Frampton. 2003. Progression through key stages of haemopoiesis is dependent on distinct threshold levels of cMyb. EMBO J. 22:4478-4488.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Ferretti, E., F. Cambronero, S. Tumpel, L. Weidemann, F. Blasi, and R. Krumlauf. 2005. Hoxb1 enhancer and control of rhombomere 4 expression: Complex interplay between Prep1-Pbx1-Hoxb1 binding sites. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:8541-8552.
17. Ferretti, E., H. Marshall, H. Pöpperl, M. Maconochie, R. Krumlauf, and F. Blasi. 2000. A complex site including both Pbx-Hox and Prep-Meis-responsive elements and binding a retinoic acid-inducible ternary Hoxb1-Pbx-Prep1 complex is required for Hoxb2 rhombomere 4 expression. Development 127:155-166.[Abstract]
18. Ferretti, E., H. Schulz, D. Talarico, F. Blasi, and J. Berthelsen. 1999. The Pbx-regulating protein Prep1 is present in a Pbx-complexed form throughout mouse embryogenesis. Mech. Dev. 83:53-64.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Fognani, C., C. Kilstrup-Jensen, E. Ferretti, V. Zappavigna, and F. Blasi. 2002. Human PREP-2, a novel interactor of PBX proto-oncogene, defines a novel sub-family of TALE homeodomain transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2043-2051.
20. Gehring, W. J., and K. Ikeo. 1999. Pax 6: mastering eye morphogenesis and eye evolution. Trends Genet. 15:371-377.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Haller, K., I. Rambaldi, E. Nagy Kovacs, E. Daniels, and M. S. Featherstone. 2002. Prep2: cloning and expression of a new Prep family member. Dev. Dyn. 225:358-364.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Herzig, S., L. Fuzesi, and W. Knepel. 2000. Heterodimeric Pbx-Prep1 homeodomain protein binding to the glucagon gene restricting transcription in a cell type dependent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 275:27989-27999.
23. Hisa, T., S. E. Spence, R. A. Rachel, M. Fujita, T. Nakamura, J. M. Ward, D. E. Devor-Henneman, Y. Saiki, H. Kutsuna, L. Tessarollo, N. A. Jenkins, and N. G. Copeland. 2004. Hematopoietic, angiogenic and eye defects in Meis1 mutant animals. EMBO J. 23:450-459.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Ibanez-Tallon, I., C. Ferrai, E. Longobardi, I. Facetti, F. Blasi, and M. Crippa. 2002. Binding of Sp1 to the proximal promoter links constitutive expression of the human uPA gene and metastatic potential of PC3 cells. Blood 100:3325-3332.
25. Jacobs, Y., Schnabel, C. A., and M. L. Cleary. 1999. Trimeric association of Hox and TALE homeodomain proteins mediates Hoxb2 hindbrain enhancer activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:5134-5142.
26. Kim, S. K., L. Selleri, J. S. Lee, Y. Jacobs, and M. L. Cleary. 2002. Defective pancreas development and function in mice deficient for Pbx1. Nat. Genet. 30:430-435.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Knoepfler, P. S., K. R. Calvo, H. Chen, S. E. Antonarakis, and M. P. Kamps. 1997. Meis 1 and pKnox1 bind DNA cooperatively with Pbx1 utilizing an interaction surface disrupted in oncoprotein E2a-Pbx1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:14553-14558.
28. Kurant, E., C.-Y. Pai, R. Sharf, N. Halachmi, Y. H. Sun, and A. Salzberg. 1998. Dorsothonal/homothorax, the Drosophila homologue of meis1, interacts with extradenticle in patterning the embryonic PNS. Development 125:1037-1048.[Abstract]
29. Lang, R. A. 2004. Pathways regulating lens induction in the mouse. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 48:783-791.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Lieu, Y. K., A. Kumar, A. G. Pajerowski, T. J. Rogers, and E. P. Reddy. 2004. Requirement of c-myb in T cell development and in mature T cell function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:14853-14858.
31. Longobardi, E., and F. Blasi. 2003. Overexpression of PREP1 leads to a functionally relevant increase of PBX2 by preventing its degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 278:39235-39241.
32. Maeda, R., A. Ishimura, K. Mood, E. K. Park, A. M. Buchberg, and I. O. Daar. 2002. Xpbx1b and Xmeis1b play a collaborative role in hindbrain and neural crest gene expression in Xenopus embryos. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:5448-5453.
33. Manley, N., L. Selleri, A. Brendolan, J. Gordon, and M. L. Cleary. 2004. Abnormalities of caudal pharyngeal pouch development in Pbx1 knockout mice mimic loss of Hox3 paralogs. Dev. Biol. 47:301-312.
34. Manzanares, M., S. Bel-Vialar, L. Ariza-McNaughton, E. Ferretti, H. Marshall, M. M. Maconochie, F. Blasi, and R. Krumlauf. 2001. Independent regulation of initiation and maintenance phases of Hoxa3 expression in the vertebrate hindbrain. Development 128:3595-3607.[Medline]
35. May, C., S. Rivella, A. Chadburn, and M. Sadelain. 2002. Successful treatment of murine-thalassemia intermedia by transfer of the human-globin gene. Blood 99:1902-1908.
36. Mercader, M., E. M. Tanake, and M. Torres. 2005. Proximodistal identity during vertebrate limb development is regulated by Meis homeodomain proteins. Development 132:4131-4142.
37. Metcalf, D., M. R. Carpinelli, C. Hyland, S. Mifsud, L. Dirago, N. A. Nicola, D. J. Hilton, and W. S. Alexander. 2005. Anomalous megakaryocytopoiesis in mice with mutations in the c-Myb gene. Blood 105:3480-3487.
38. Monica, K., N. Galili, J. Nourse, D. Saltman, and M. L. Cleary. 1993. PBX2 and PBX3, new homeobox genes with extensive homology to the human proto-oncogene PBX1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:6149-6157.
39. Morgan, R., J. Sohal, M. Paleja, and R. Pettengell. 2004. Pbx genes are required in Xenopus lens development. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 48:623-627.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Penkov, D., P. Di Rosa, L. Fernandez Diaz, V. Basso, E. Ferretti, F. Grassi, A. Mondino, and F. Blasi. 2005. Involvement of Prep1 in the
ß T-cell receptor T-lymphocytic potential of hematopoietic precursors. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:10768-10781.
41. Rhee, J. W., A. Arata, L. Selleri, Y. Jacobs, S. Arata, H. Onimaru, and M. L. Cleary. 2004. Pbx3 deficiency results in central hypoventilation. Am. J. Pathol. 165:1343-1350.
42. Ryoo, H. D., T. Marty, F. Casares, M. Affolter, and R. S. Mann. 1999. Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound homothorax/Hox/extradenticle complex. Development 126:5137-5148.[Abstract]
43. Salzberg, A., S. Elias, N. Nachaliel, L. Bonstien, C. Henig, and D. Frank. 1999. A Meis family protein caudalizes neural cell fate in Xenopus laevis embryos. Mech. Dev. 80:3-13.[CrossRef][Medline]
44. Schnabel, C., R. E. Godin, and M. L. Cleary. 2003. Pbx1 regulates nephrogenesis and ureteric branching in the developing kidney. Dev. Biol. 254:262-276.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Scott, W. 2004. Angiogenesis assays. Methods Mol. Med. 88:239-246.[Medline]
46. Selleri, L., M. J. Depew, Y. Jacobs, S. K. Chanda, K. Y. Tsang, K. S. E. Cheah, J. L. R. Rubenstein, S. O'Gorman, and M. L. Cleary. 2001. Requirement for Pbx1 in skeletal patterning and programming chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development 128:3543-3557.[Medline]
47. Selleri, L., J. DiMartino, J. van Deursen, A. Brendolan, M. Sanyal, E. Boon, T. Capellini, K. S. Smith, J. Rhee, H. Popperl, G. Grosveld, and M. L. Cleary. 2004. The TALE homeodomain protein Pbx2 is not essential for development and long-term survival. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:5324-5331.
48. Simpson, T. I., and D. J. Pryce. 2002. Pax 6; a pleiotropic player in development. Bioessays 24:1041-1051.[CrossRef][Medline]
49. Steelman, S., J. J. Moskow, K. Muzynski, C. North, T. Druck, J. C. Montgomery, K. Huebner, I. O. Daar, and A. M. Buchberg. 1997. Identification of a conserved family of Meis1-related homeobox genes. Genome Res. 7:142-156.
50. Swift, G. H., Y. Liu, S. D. Rose, L. J. Bischof, S. Steelman, A. M. Buchberg, C. V. Wright, and R. J. MacDonald. 1998. An endocrine-exocrine switch in the activity of the pancreatic homeodomain protein PDX1 through formation of a trimeric complex with PBX1b and MRG1 (MEIS2). Mol. Cell. Biol. 9:5109-5120.
51. Thomas, M. D., C. S. Kremer, K. S. Ravichandran, K. Rajewsky, and T. P. Bender. 2005. c-Myb is critical for B cell development and maintenance of follicular B cells. Immunity 23:275-286.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. Treisman, J. E. 2004. How to make an eye. Development 131:3823-3827.
53. Vlachakis, N., S.-K. Choe, and C. G. Sagerstrom. 2001. Meis3 synergizes with Pbx4 and Hoxb1 in promoting hindbrain fates in the zebrafish. Development 128:1299-1312.[Abstract]
54. Waskiewicz, A. J., H. A. Rikhof, R. E. Hernandez, and C. B. Moens. 2001. Zebrafish Meis functions to stabilize Pbx proteins and regulate hindbrain patterning. Development 128:4139-4151.
55. Zambrowicz, B. P., G. A. Friedrich, E. C. Buxton, S. L. Lilleberg, C. Person, and A. T. Sands. 1998. Disruption and sequence identification of 2,000 genes in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 392:608-611.[CrossRef][Medline]
56. Zambrowicz, B. P., A. Abuin, R. Ramirez-Solis, L. J. Richter, J. Piggott, H. BeltrandelRio, E. C. Buxton, J. Edwards, R. A. Finch, C. J. Friddle, A. Gupta, G. Hansen, Y. Hu, W. Huang, C. Jaing, B. W. Key, Jr., P. Kipp, B. Kohlhauff, Z. Q. Ma, D. Markesich, R. Payne, D. G. Potter, N. Qian, J. Shaw, J. Schrick, Z. Z. Shi, M. J. Sparks, I. Van Sligtenhorst, P. Vogel, W. Walke, N. Xu, Q. Zhu, C. Person, and A. T. Sands. 2003. Wnk1 kinase deficiency lowers blood pressure in mice: a gene-trap screen to identify potential targets for therapeutic intervention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:14109-14114.
57. Zhang, J., M. Socolovsky, A. W. Gross, and H. F. Lodish. 2003. Role of Ras signaling in erythroid differentiation of mouse fetal liver cells: functional analysis by a flow cytometry-based novel culture system. Blood 102:3938-3946.
58. Zhang, X., A. Friedman, S. Heaney, P. Purcell, and R. L. Maas. 2002. Meis1 homeoprotein directly regulates Pax 6 during vertebrate lens morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 16:2097-2107.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||