Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, August 2006, p. 6130-6138, Vol. 26, No. 16
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.00543-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Telomeres and Telomerase Group, Molecular Oncology Program, Spanish National Cancer Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain,1 Cancer Research Institute, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California2
Received 28 March 2006/ Returned for modification 19 April 2006/ Accepted 7 June 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the known transcriptional targets of Myc is the catalytic subunit of telomerase or Tert (7, 8, 18, 32, 33, 35). Tert, together with its partner, the telomerase RNA component or Terc, can reconstitute an active telomerase complex in vitro (34). Telomerase is absent form most adult somatic tissues, with the exception of certain stem cell populations and lymphoid tissues, resulting in a progressive loss of telomeric sequences with age (2). This progressive telomere loss has been proposed to suppress tumorigenesis by limiting the replicative potential of cells (1, 2, 16). In agreement with this notion, telomerase is aberrantly reactivated in the majority of human cancers, where it is thought to sustain tumor growth by elongating critically short telomeres and providing limitless replicative potential, which has highlighted telomerase as an attractive target for therapeutic strategies (19, 30). In addition, mounting evidence suggests that telomerase not only promotes tumorigenesis by its ability to elongate short telomeres but might also enhance cell proliferation and survival independently of telomere length (17, 31). In this regard, it has been recently shown that mouse Tert (mTert) overexpression in basal cells and stem cells of mouse skin results in increased epidermal stem cell mobilization and that promotes the anagen phase of hair growth independently of telomere length (12, 28). Interestingly, these telomere length-independent effects of mTert in the skin anticipate the skin tumor-prone phenotype previously described for these mice (17).
Similar to that of humans, mouse adult skin has very low or undetectable levels of telomerase activity, which is increased in late-stage skin tumors (5). To evaluate the contribution of telomerase to Myc actions in vivo, we have used a previously described Myc model of skin papillomatosis, the Inv-MycERTAM mouse (27). In this mouse model, expression of a switchable form of Myc has been targeted to the skin epidermis via the involucrin promoter. Activation of MycERTAM in adult mice by topical and daily application of the ERTAM-activating ligand 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) induces keratinocyte proliferation, which in turn provokes an increase in the number of keratinocyte layers in the area treated (13, 27). Given that MycERTAM is driven by the involucrin promoter, the transgene is expressed in the epidermis at the basal-suprabasal transition, further increasing its expression as keratinocytes progress through their differentiation program (13).
To explore a possible role for Myc in telomerase regulation in vivo and a role for telomerase and telomere length in Myc-induced papillomatosis, we have generated various compound mice for Myc and telomerase in the skin. The results described here demonstrate that Myc regulates telomerase activity levels in the skin in vivo by upregulating mTert transcription and that this telomerase activation significantly contributes to Myc-elicited skin papillomatosis. Moreover, we show that critical telomere shortening in telomerase-deficient mice severely impairs the Myc response. Finally, we show that mice doubly transgenic for Myc and mTert show augmented skin papillomatosis, further suggesting a role for telomerase activation in Myc-induced papillomatosis.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Real-time quantitative PCR for mTert mRNA detection. Three or four 8-week-old mice of the indicated genotypes were treated by daily topical application of 4-OHT or EtOH to the upper dorsal skin. At the indicated time points, treated skin was collected and total RNA was prepared with Trizol (Invitrogen). mTert mRNA detection was performed as previously described (15). Briefly, reverse transcription was conducted with 1 µg of total RNA, random hexamers as primers, and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was done with two dilutions in duplicates of cDNA on an ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems), with SYBR Green (Applied Biosystems), where each reaction contained 1x SYBR-Green mix, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.4 µM each primer, 0.5 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 5 µl of the sample. For each mRNA sample, mTert expression was corrected by the actin mRNA content in each sample. The PCRs employed a set of primers specific for the mTert gene (TERT-F, 5' GGA TTG CCA CTG GCT CCG 3'; TERT-R, 5' TGC CTG ACC TCC TCT TGT GAC 3') and a set specific for actin (ACTIN-F, 5' GGC ACC ACA CCT TCT ACA ATG 3', ACTIN-R, 5' GTG GTG GTG AAG CTG TAG 3').
Telomerase assays. Telomerase activity of skin was measured with a modified telomeric repeat protocol (TRAP) as previously described (4). As a control for PCR efficiency, a previously described internal control was used (4). TRAP assays were performed under linear conditions of product amplification, which allowed semiquantitative detection of telomerase activity levels. TRAP products were quantified with ImageJ (version 1.32) software.
IHC of mouse skin. For BrdU detection in epidermis, samples from the upper back skin or from the tail skin were fixed overnight in neutral-buffered formalin at 4°C, dehydrated through graded alcohols and xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer sections were used for immunohistochemistry (IHC). Prior to IHC, slides were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and immersed in 10 mM citrate solution and epitopes were retrieved by three high-power 5-min microwave pulses. Slides were washed in water, blocked in a 1:10 dilution of normal goat serum (Vectors Labs), and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a mouse monoclonal antibody against BrdU at 1:400 (clone BU-1; Amersham). Samples were then incubated at room temperature for 1 h with biotinylated secondary antibodies from Vector Labs (goat anti-rabbit at 1:200 or goat anti-mouse at 1:200), followed by signal development with an immunoperoxidase reagent (avidin-biotin-peroxidase-horseradish peroxidase; Vector Labs) and diaminobenzidine (Sigma) as the substrate. Eight different sections per genotype and treatment regimen were slightly counterstained with hematoxylin and analyzed by light microscopy.
Telomere Q-FISH analysis on skin. For quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (Q-FISH) determinations, paraffin-embedded skin sections from the upper back and tail were hybridized with a PNA-telo probe and the fluorescence intensity of telomeres was determined as previously described (17). Slides were deparaffinized in three xylene washes and then treated with 100, 95, and 70% EtOH. Fifty nuclei per keratinocyte layer were captured for each mouse at a magnification of x100, and the telomere fluorescence was integrated by spot integrated optical density analysis with the TFL-TELO program (17). To correct for daily variations in lamp alignment and intensity, images from fluorescent beads (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.) and from wild-type (WT) skin were captured and analyzed with the TFL-TELO program. The average telomere fluorescence of WT basal keratinocytes was normalized between different experiments.
Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis of differences between different mouse cohorts was performed with the Student t test with one tail and two samples of equal variance. Microsoft Excel v. X was used for calculations. For Student's t test, the differences are considered not significant for P > 0.05, significant for P < 0.05, highly significant for P < 0.01, and extremely significant for P < 0.001.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
24% reduction in the number of interfollicular keratinocyte layers (statistically significant, P = 0.031 [Fig. 2c]) and an
17% reduction in the abundance of total BrdU-proliferating cells within the interfollicular epidermis (IFE) (statistically significant, P = 0.047 [Fig. 2d]) were found in Inv-MycERTAM x G1 Terc/ mouse skin compared to the skin of similarly treated Inv-MycERTAM mice. These findings indicate that the presence of Terc, and therefore of active Tert/Terc telomerase complexes, has a modest but significant effect in eliciting a full Myc-induced hyperplastic response.
|
78% reduction in 4-OHT-treated MycERTAM x G3 Terc/ mice compared to similarly treated Inv-MycERTAM controls (extremely significant, P < 0.001 [Fig. 2c]). Coincidentally, the number of total proliferating keratinocytes (BrdU-positive cells) in Inv-MycERTAM x G3 Terc/ epidermis was lower compared to Inv-MycERTAM epidermis (Fig. 2b shows examples, and Fig. 2d shows quantification). This represented an
56% reduction in 4-OHT-treated MycERTAM x G3 Terc/ mice compared to similarly treated Inv-MycERTAM controls (extremely significant, P < 0.001 [Fig. 2d]). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that short telomeres severely limit Myc-induced papillomatosis in the skin. Furthermore, they show a modest but significant decrease in Myc-induced papillomatosis in G1 Terc/ mice, suggesting that this response is partially dependent on telomerase activity. In turn, the fact that the Myc-induced hyperplastic response was only partially inhibited in the absence of telomerase in G1 Terc/ mice suggests that Myc induces papillomatosis by ways that are partially independent of telomerase activation.
Next, we determined telomere length in Myc-induced skin from Inv-MycERTAM, Inv-MycERTAM x G1 Terc/, and Inv-MycERTAM x G3 Terc/ mice by Q-FISH (see Materials and Methods). First, Myc activation for 14 days did not result in increased telomere length compared to the nontreated animals (see below), in agreement with previous reports showing that increased transgenic Tert expression in the skin does not lead to telomere elongation and supporting the notion that normal-length telomeres are not further elongated by telomerase (17). Next, we observed that the average telomere length per keratinocyte in Inv-MycERTAM 4-OHT-treated skin was maintained relatively constant (an average of 280 ± 29 arbitrary telomere fluorescence units) as keratinocytes migrated from the basal layer to the outermost viable layer of the epidermis (no significant differences between the innermost and outermost viable layers, P > 0.05 [Fig. 3a and b]), in agreement with the known telomerase expression in the skin mitotically active compartments (12). In contrast, both G1 and G3 Inv-MycERTAM x Terc/ 4-OHT-treated mice showed progressive telomere attrition in skin keratinocytes as they migrate from the basal layer to the surface of the skin (Fig. 3a shows representative examples, and Fig. 3b shows quantification). This represented an
29% telomere reduction between the innermost and outermost keratinocyte layers (statistically significant for both G1 and G3 Terc x Inv-MycERTAM, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively [Fig. 3a and b]), in agreement with the fact that these mice lack telomerase activity because of Terc deficiency. The decline in average telomere length was similar for both Inv-MycERTAM x G1 Terc/ and Inv-MycERTAM x G3 Terc/ keratinocytes, but the initial telomere length (value of the innermost layer) was lower in Inv-MycERTAM keratinocytes in a G3 Terc/ background (an average of 214 ± 63 arbitrary fluorescence units [Fig. 3b]), in agreement with three generations in the absence of telomerase activity. These data indicate the existence of a telomere length-dependent threshold that limits keratinocyte proliferation in the skin, similar to that previously shown for other mouse tissues (29). Furthermore, these results indicate that Myc-dependent mTert upregulation in the absence of Terc is not sufficient to prevent telomere shortening associated with increased hyperplasia.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By using mouse models, we show here that mTert is transcriptionally activated by Myc in the skin and that this results in Myc-induced telomerase activation. Furthermore, we show that increased telomerase activity partially contributes to Myc protumorigenic actions in vivo. In particular, Myc-mediated mTert upregulation in a Terc-deficient background, therefore in the absence of active telomerase complexes, leads to a modest but significant reduction in the Myc-induced hyperplastic response. Interestingly, this inhibitory effect of telomerase deficiency in Myc-induced papillomatosis is more pronounced in mice with short telomeres (a situation that resemble human tumors), supporting the idea that telomerase inhibitors may show some efficacy in Myc-selective therapeutics of human tumors.
These results highlight the fact that the abilities of skin keratinocytes to respond to mitogenic signals and to produce hyperplastic lesions require maintenance of telomere length above a certain threshold, which would allow keratinocyte proliferation for longer times and enlarge the proliferative compartment. It is important to note, however, that the expansion of the proliferative compartment in Myc-induced skin is self-limited since the execution of the final stages of the keratinocyte terminal differentiation program has been shown to prevail over the ability of Myc to maintain suprabasal keratinocyte proliferation (13).
Finally, we show that although mTert overexpression failed to substitute for Myc activation in inducing papillomatosis, in analogy with their different roles in transformation assays in vitro (18), it significantly augments hyperplastic lesions in Myc-transgenic mice. These results suggest additive effects of mTert overexpression in basal cell layers and Myc upregulation in the upper skin layers, leading to increased Myc-induced skin papillomatosis, which occurs in the absence of significant changes in telomere length. This effect of mTert overexpression augmenting Myc-induced papillomatosis could be explained in light of our recent findings demonstrating that mTert overexpression increases epidermal stem cell mobilization (12), which in turn could have additive effects with Myc expression in the basal-to-suprabasal skin layers.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We do not have any conflicts of interest.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Blasco, M. A. 2005. Telomeres and human disease: ageing, cancer and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:611-622.[Medline]
3. Blasco, M. A., and W. C. Hahn. 2003. Evolving views of telomerase and cancer. Trends Cell Biol. 13:289-294.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Blasco, M. A., H. W. Lee, M. P. Hande, E. Samper, P. M. Lansdorp, R. A. DePinho, and C. W. Greider. 1997. Telomere shortening and tumor formation by mouse cells lacking telomerase RNA. Cell 91:25-34.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Blasco, M. A., M. Rizen, C. W. Greider, and D. Hanahan. 1996. Differential regulation of telomerase activity and telomerase RNA during multi-stage tumorigenesis. Nat. Genet. 12:200-204.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Cayuela, M. L., J. M. Flores, and M. A. Blasco. 2005. The telomerase RNA component Terc is required for the tumour-promoting effects of Tert overexpression. EMBO Rep. 6:268-274.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Cerezo, A., H. Kalthoff, M. Schuermann, B. Schafer, and P. Boukamp. 2002. Dual regulation of telomerase activity through c-Myc-dependent inhibition and alternative splicing of hTERT. J. Cell Sci. 115:1305-1312.
8. Drissi, R., F. Zindy, M. F. Roussel, and J. L. Cleveland. 2001. c-Myc-mediated regulation of telomerase activity is disabled in immortalized cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:29994-30001.
9. Evan, G. I., A. H. Wyllie, C. S. Gilbert, T. D. Littlewood, H. Land, M. Brooks, C. M. Waters, L. Z. Penn, and D. C. Hancock. 1992. Induction of apoptosis in fibroblasts by c-myc protein. Cell 69:119-128.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Felsher, D. W. 2003. Cancer revoked: oncogenes as therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3:375-379.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Felsher, D. W. Reversibility of oncogene-induced cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 14:37-42.
12. Flores, I., M. L. Cayuela, and M. A. Blasco. 2005. Effects of telomerase and telomere length on epidermal stem cell behavior. Science 309:1253-1256.
13. Flores, I., D. J. Murphy, L. B. Swigart, U. Knies, and G. I. Evan. 2004. Defining the temporal requirements for Myc in the progression and maintenance of skin neoplasia. Oncogene 23:5923-5930.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Gonzalez-Suarez, E., J. M. Flores, and M. A. Blasco. 2002. Cooperation between p53 mutation and high telomerase transgenic expression in spontaneous cancer development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:7291-7301.
15. Gonzalez-Suarez, E., C. Geserick, J. M. Flores, and M. A. Blasco. 2005. Antagonistic effects of telomerase on cancer and aging in K5-mTert transgenic mice. Oncogene 24:2256-2270.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Gonzalez-Suarez, E., E. Samper, J. M. Flores, and M. A. Blasco. 2000. Telomerase-deficient mice with short telomeres are resistant to skin tumorigenesis. Nat. Genet. 26:114-117.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Gonzalez-Suarez, E., E. Samper, A. Ramirez, J. M. Flores, J. Martin-Caballero, J. L. Jorcano, and M. A. Blasco. 2001. Increased epidermal tumors and increased skin wound healing in transgenic mice overexpressing the catalytic subunit of telomerase, mTERT, in basal keratinocytes. EMBO J. 20:2619-2630.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Greenberg, R. A., R. C. O'Hagan, H. Deng, Q. Xiao, S. R. Hann, R. R. Adams, S. Lichtsteiner, L. Chin, G. B. Morin, and R. A. DePinho. 1999. Telomerase reverse transcriptase gene is a direct target of c-Myc but is not functionally equivalent in cellular transformation. Oncogene 18:1219-1226.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Hanahan, D., and R. A. Weinberg. 2000. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57-70.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Herrera, E., E. Samper, J. Martin-Caballero, J. M. Flores, H. W. Lee, and M. A. Blasco. 1999. Disease states associated with telomerase deficiency appear earlier in mice with short telomeres. EMBO J. 18:2950-2960.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Martin-Rivera, L., E. Herrera, J. P. Albar, and M. A. Blasco. 1998. Expression of mouse telomerase catalytic subunit in embryos and adult tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:10471-10476.
22. Miliani de Marval, P. L., E. Macias, R. Rounbehler, P. Sicinski, H. Kiyokawa, D. G. Johnson, C. J. Conti, and M. L. Rodriguez-Puebla. 2004. Lack of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibits c-myc tumorigenic activities in epithelial tissues. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:7538-7547.
23. Murphy, D. J., L. B. Swigart, M. A. Israel, and G. I. Evan. 2004. Id2 is dispensable for Myc-induced epidermal neoplasia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:2083-2090.
24. Nilsson, J. A., and J. L. Cleveland. 2003. Myc pathways provoking cell suicide and cancer. Oncogene 22:9007-9021.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Patel, J. H., A. P. Loboda, M. K. Showe, L. C. Showe, and S. B. McMahon. 2004. Analysis of genomic targets reveals complex functions of MYC. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4:562-568.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Pelengaris, S., M. Khan, and G. Evan. 2002. c-MYC: more than just a matter of life and death. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2:764-776.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Pelengaris, S., T. Littlewood, M. Khan, G. Elia, and G. Evan. 1999. Reversible activation of c-Myc in skin: induction of a complex neoplastic phenotype by a single oncogenic lesion. Mol. Cell 3:565-577.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Sarin, K. Y., P. Cheung, D. Gilison, E. Lee, R. I. Tennen, E. Wang, M. K. Artandi, A. E. Oro, and S. E. Artandi. 2005. Conditional telomerase induction causes proliferation of hair follicle stem cells. Nature 436:1048-1052.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Satyanarayana, A., S. U. Wiemann, J. Buer, J. Lauber, K. E. Dittmar, T. Wustefeld, M. A. Blasco, M. P. Manns, and K. L. Rudolph. 2003. Telomere shortening impairs organ regeneration by inhibiting cell cycle re-entry of a subpopulation of cells. EMBO J. 22:4003-4013.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Shay, J. W., and W. E. Wright. 2002. Telomerase: a target for cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell 2:257-265.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Smith, L. L., H. A. Coller, and J. M. Roberts. 2003. Telomerase modulates expression of growth-controlling genes and enhances cell proliferation. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:474-479.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Smogorzewska, A., and T. de Lange. 2004. Regulation of telomerase by telomeric proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:177-208.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Wang, J., L. Y. Xie, S. Allan, D. Beach, and G. J. Hannon. 1998. Myc activates telomerase. Genes Dev. 12:1769-1774.
34. Weinrich, S. L., R. Pruzan, L. Ma, M. Ouellette, V. M. Tesmer, S. E. Holt, A. G. Bodnar, S. Lichtsteiner, N. W. Kim, J. B. Trager, R. D. Taylor, R. Carlos, W. H. Andrews, W. E. Wright, J. W. Shay, C. B. Harley, and G. B. Morin. 1997. Reconstitution of human telomerase with the template RNA component hTR and the catalytic protein subunit hTRT. Nat. Genet. 17:498-502.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Wu, K. J., C. Grandori, M. Amacker, N. Simon-Vermot, A. Polack, J. Lingner, and R. Dalla-Favera. 1999. Direct activation of TERT transcription by c-MYC. Nat. Genet. 21:220-224.[CrossRef][Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|