Section of Molecular Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0322,1 Laboratory of Cell Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892,2 Biology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 119733
Received 11 January 2006/ Returned for modification 7 February 2006/ Accepted 3 July 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Posttranslational modifications of p53 play important roles in regulating p53 stability and activity (1, 55). The p53 protein can be posttranslationally modified at approximately 30 different sites, primarily through the phosphorylation of serine or threonine residues and the acetylation of lysines. Most sites of posttranslational modification reside in the amino- or carboxy-terminal segments of the p53 polypeptide, both of which are predicted to be largely unstructured when not associated with other proteins (3). Both regions of p53 interact with a large number of cellular proteins that may modulate p53 stability and activity, thereby differentially regulating the expression of p53 target genes that control cell cycle progression, apoptosis, or senescence (28). In response to DNA damage and other cellular stresses, the protein levels and the activity of p53 as a transcription factor are greatly increased (29). The interaction between p53 and MDM2, Pirh2, or COP1, each of which is a transcriptional target of p53, leads to the ubiquitination of p53 and its rapid degradation (5). In this context, MDM2, Pirh2, and COP1 each act as a p53-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase, thus functioning in feedback systems that negatively regulate p53 stability (5). In addition, the interaction between Mdm2 or MdmX and the N terminus of p53 inhibits p53 transcriptional activities (39).
Human p53 becomes acetylated at multiple lysine residues in its C terminus in response to various stresses. Six of these, Lys305, -370, -372, -373, -381, and -382, can be acetylated in vitro by the histone acetyltransferase p300 or CBP, which are closely related enzymes that function as coactivators for a number of transcription factors (19, 50). These studies suggest that these acetylation events activate p53 transcriptional activities. Some or all of these C-terminal lysine residues can also be ubiquitinated by Mdm2 and modified by other mechanisms, such as neddylation and sumoylation (5, 13, 54). Cell line transfection experiments have shown that the Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of the C-terminal lysine residues is important for p53 destabilization (33, 44, 49). However, by mutating the endogenous mouse p53 gene to change these C-terminal lysines to arginines, recent knock-in studies indicate that the posttranslational modifications at these lysine residues are not important for regulating p53 stability and only fine-tune p53 activity (17, 30).
Lys320 of human p53 is acetylated in vitro by PCAF, the p300/CBP-associated factor (36, 50); this site is also acetylated in vivo following DNA damage. The corresponding lysine residue of mouse p53 is also acetylated in vivo after DNA damage (10). PCAF is a component of several large chromatin remodeling complexes, e.g., SAGA, that include proteins important for p53-mediated transcription and apoptosis, such as hADA2 and hADA3 (8, 53). Based on several reports that Lys320 acetylation is correlated with increased sequence-specific DNA binding and transcriptional activation, it has been thought that this acetylation positively regulates p53 responses (2, 50, 51). However, other experiments failed to show a significant requirement for acetylation of the human K320 site for the p53-dependent transcriptional activation of reporter genes in transient transfection assays (36). To determine the physiological roles of this acetylation in regulating p53 responses to DNA damage, a missense Lys317 (corresponding to human Lys320)-to-Arg mutation was introduced into both alleles of the endogenous p53 gene of mice. Analysis of the p53-dependent responses to DNA damage in p53K317R mice indicated that this acetylation negatively regulates p53 apoptotic responses to DNA damage.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Western immunoblot analysis. Cell extracts were prepared in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis buffer, and the proteins from 5 x 105 MEFs or 107 thymocytes were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 8% (for Mdm2), 10% (for p53), or 12% (for p21Waf1) polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were probed with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against p21 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), a polyclonal antibody against p53 (CM-5; Novocastra Laboratories Ltd.), a polyclonal antibody against mouse acetyl-K317 p53 (Trevigen Inc.), or a monoclonal antibody against Mdm2 (2A10; Calbiochem/Oncogene Sciences). Filters were subsequently incubated with horseradish peroxide-conjugated secondary antibody and developed with ECL Plus (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). The anti-acetyl-K317 p53 immunoblot was developed using an IR dye-tagged secondary antibody and scanned using the Odyssey imager (LI-COR Biosciences). To control for loading, filters were stripped and probed with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.).
p53-Mdm2 coimmunoprecipitation. MEF cells were lysed in TNEP buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 170 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 10 mM NaF, 0.2 mM Na3VO4 with protease inhibitors) and centrifuged. Protein lysate (1 mg) was immunoprecipitated with a polyclonal antibody against p53 that was conjugated to agarose beads (FL-393AC; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). The immune complexes were rinsed three times with NETN (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.7, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40) and analyzed by Western blotting.
Cell cycle analysis. MEFs were seeded at 1 million cells/10-cm plate and synchronized at G1/G0 for 96 h in DMEM containing 0.1% fetal bovine serum. The cultures were released from the cell cycle block by transfer to normal DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Untreated MEFs or MEFs treated with 45 J/m2 UVC were continuously labeled with BrdU (10 µM; Sigma-Aldrich Co.) for 24 h and harvested by being fixed overnight in 70% ethanol. The S-phase cells were revealed by staining with anti-BrdU antibody, followed by flow cytometric analysis as described previously (9). The G1/G0- and G2/M-phase cells were revealed by staining with propidium iodide.
Analysis of p53-dependent apoptosis in mouse tissues. Mice were handled according to guidelines from the UCSD Animal Subjects Committee. Thymocytes were recovered from 4- to 6-week-old mice, and single-cell suspensions were exposed to various dosages of IR. The apoptotic cells were analyzed 10 h following IR by staining with annexin V (BD Biosciences/Pharmingen).
To analyze p53-dependent apoptosis in the mouse small intestine, 2-month-old mice were irradiated with 8 Gy of IR, and the irradiated animals were sacrificed 5 h later. Their small intestines were fixed overnight in 10% formalin, embedded in paraffin, and then sectioned. The apoptotic cells in sections were revealed by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining by using a Klenow FragEL kit (Calbiochem/Oncogene Science) as recommended by the manufacturer. Sections were examined by fluorescence microscopy.
Retinal apoptosis assays were performed as described previously (4). Briefly, all experiments were performed using postnatal day 3 (P3) littermate pups (day 0 is the day of birth). P3 mice were exposed to 2 Gy whole-body irradiation using a 137Cs irradiator. Mice were kept warm and sacrificed at 6 h following irradiation. The eyes were removed and immersed in fixation buffer (4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4); the tails were used for DNA extraction and genotyping. Following overnight fixation, the eyes were infiltrated with 20% sucrose in phosphate-buffered saline and embedded in tissue-embedding medium, OCT (Tissue-Tek; Sakura). Transverse frozen sections were processed for the TUNEL assay according to the manufacturer's protocol (Roche) and then counterstained with 1 µg/ml bisbenzimide (Hoechst-332558; Sigma-Aldrich Co.). Quantification of retinal apoptotic cells was realized in the inner nuclear layer (INL) and neuroblastic layer (NBL) under the light microscope (magnification, x400) using a grid coupled to the eyepiece. TUNEL-positive nuclei were counted in two to three fields (field
0.04 mm2) per animal. Histograms show the mean and standard error of the mean from four to five animals per genotype. Statistic analysis was realized using Prisma 4 (GraphPad Software Inc.).
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Total RNA was purified from MEFs and thymocytes using TRIzol (Invitrogen), followed by a further purification using the RNeasy mini kit (QIAGEN Inc.). RNA samples were treated with RNase-free DNase I (QIAGEN Inc.) and converted to cDNA using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI 7000 machine (Applied Biosystems) using a 2x SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems). PCR conditions were as follows: 10-min hot start at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 95°C and 1 min at 61°C. Reactions were run in triplicate wells, and the average cycle threshold for each gene was calculated as previously described (9); mRNA levels of each gene were standardized to the mRNA levels of GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase). Primers for p21, Mdm2, and Noxa have been described previously (9). The primers for Lrdd (Pidd) were 5'-CTGGTTCCTGGTCGTTTTACG-3' and 5'-GGATGACCTGAGGAGCAGAGA-3'.
Promoter luciferase assay. E1A/Ras-expressing MEFs were seeded onto the 24-well plate at a density of 200,000 cells per well. Twenty-four hours after plating, 50 ng of p21-Luc (48) or Pidd-Luc (35) construct was cotransfected with 4 ng of thymidine kinase promoter-Renilla luciferase vector using HyFect transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions (Denville Scientific Inc.). After transfection, cells were cultured in normal MEF medium with or without 1 µM doxorubicin for 6 h. The luciferase activity was determined with the Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega Corporation) as previously described (34).
Microarray analysis of p53-regulated genes.
Thymocytes from wild-type or p53K317R mice were cultured as described above and either left untreated or exposed to 5 Gy IR. After 5 h, total RNA was isolated as described above. Total RNA (1 µg) was converted to cRNA, linearly amplified, and fluorescently labeled using a low-input RNA linear amplification kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) and Cy3- or Cy5-labeled CTP (PerkinElmer) following the manufacturer's directions. Untreated (Cy3 labeled, 750 ng) and IR-treated (Cy5 labeled, 750 ng) samples were combined and hybridized to a microarray (Agilent mouse oligonucleotide array,
22,000 features) for 17 h at 60°C. Following low-stringency and high-stringency washes, microarray slides were dried and stored under nitrogen in the dark. Hybridization signals (Agilent microarray scanner) were background corrected and Lowess normalized (Agilent Feature Extraction software). Results from duplicate arrays for each of two independent wild-type or K317R thymocyte preparations for a total of eight arrays were analyzed collectively. Signals with a geometric mean normalized intensity of greater than 0.15 were analyzed further. Genes responsive to IR were identified by applying the Student t test and selecting those with a P value of less than 0.001. Genes for which the IR-induced level was significantly affected by the K317R mutation were identified by applying the Student t test and selecting those with P values of less than 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
p53 stability and activity in MEFs after DNA damage. To investigate the effects of lysine 317 acetylation on p53 stabilization after DNA damage, we analyzed p53 protein levels at different times in p53K317R and control wild-type MEFs following DNA damage induced by UVC radiation, IR, or doxorubicin treatment. Our analyses indicated that p53 accumulated to normal levels in MEFs after each of these treatments (Fig. 2A to C). Consistent with these findings, the p53-Mdm2 interactions were disrupted similarly in wild-type and p53K317R MEFs after UV radiation (Fig. 2D).
|
|
|
|
p53-dependent apoptosis in E1A/Ras-expressing MEFs after DNA damage. Although MEFs generally undergo cell cycle arrest in response to DNA-damaging treatments, overexpression of the oncoproteins E1A and Ras sensitizes MEFs to p53-dependent apoptosis after DNA damage (37). Therefore, E1A/Ras-expressing p53K317R and control MEFs were generated by infection with a retroviral vector that expresses both E1A and Ras as described previously (7). Significantly more apoptosis was observed in E1A/Ras-expressing p53K317R MEFs than in E1A/Ras-expressing wild-type MEFs after doxorubicin treatment, indicating increased p53 apoptotic activities in E1A/Ras-expressing p53K317R MEFs after DNA damage (Fig. 6A). Consistent with this finding, the mRNA levels of the proapoptotic p53 target genes, the Puma, Noxa, Fas (Killer/DR5), and Lrdd (Pidd) genes, were higher in E1A/Ras-expressing p53K317R MEFs than in E1A/Ras-expressing p53 wild-type MEFs (Fig. 6B).
|
Microarray analysis. To investigate the global effects of the K317R mutation on p53-dependent transcriptional responses to IR, differentially labeled RNA samples from untreated thymocytes and thymocytes harvested 5 h after exposure to 5 Gy IR were hybridized to spotted microarrays corresponding to approximately 20,000 genes. Normalized and aggregated hybridization intensities were filtered to select approximately 1,400 genes whose expression was significantly affected (Student's t test P values of less than 0.001) in wild-type or mutant thymocytes after exposure to IR. The distribution of the effects of IR and the K317R mutation on the expression of these genes is shown in Fig. 7. Approximately 35% of the IR-responsive genes exhibited increased expression in response to IR, while 65% were repressed. The proportion of genes induced or repressed by IR was similar to that reported previously (40). Approximately 150 of these genes are significantly affected by the K317R mutation (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The selection was based on a univariant test (P < 0.05) applied successively to each gene. Assuming equal variance, we expect that approximately eight of the genes in Table S1 may be "false positives" in which the appearance of an effect of the K317R mutation has arisen by chance. The fraction of the 150 genes induced or repressed was not significantly different from those that responded to IR; 39 percent were induced while 61 percent were repressed. This list includes previously identified direct and indirect targets of p53 and may include additional p53 target genes that have not yet been identified. However, 25 of the genes significantly affected by the K317R mutation are direct targets of p53, as determined from literature sources (Table 1). The distribution of the effects of IR and the K317R mutation on the p53-responsive gene subset is also shown in Fig. 7. Of the 25 mutation-affected, p53-responsive genes, 12 were induced following exposure to IR and 13 were repressed. All of the induced genes exhibited greater induction in thymocytes from p53K317R mice than in thymocytes from wild-type mice. Six of these, namely, Bbc3 (Puma), Phlda3, Pmaip1 (Noxa), Apaf1, Lrdd (Pidd), and Fas (Tnfrsf6), are strongly proapoptotic. Of the mutant-affected genes that were repressed following IR, 10 exhibited greater repression in the mutant. Only three genes, DNA polymerase (Pold1), calmodulin 3 (Calm3), and Pycard, exhibit reduced repression in K317R compared with that in wild-type thymocytes. Interestingly, the list of significantly repressed genes does not contain genes whose mechanisms of repression by p53 are well established (21). In summary, for 88% of the p53-responsive genes significantly affected by the K317R mutation, its effect was to increase the magnitude of the response, whether it was induction or repression. This finding suggests that in thymocytes, the effect of acetylation of lysine 317 is to negatively modulate the activity of p53 as a transcriptional activator or repressor for a subset of target genes.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We report here our studies of p53K317R knock-in mice to address the physiological roles of the p53 acetylation at lysine 317 in regulating p53 responses to DNA damage. Our studies indicate that abrogation of this acetylation enhances p53-mediated apoptosis after DNA damage in all cell types analyzed. This unexpected role of K317 acetylation suggests that some posttranslational modifications of p53 may have evolved to keep p53 apoptotic activities in check to prevent excessive apoptosis and loss of physiologically important cells after DNA damage. In addition, since apoptosis can induce aging (31), the posttranslational modifications that negatively regulate p53 apoptotic activities could also play important roles in balancing p53 activities in tumor suppression and aging of the whole organism.
Our studies also indicate that K317 acetylation modulates the ability of p53 to activate the expression of a subclass of p53 target genes, several of which are involved in apoptosis. The K317R mutation affects both the genes whose expression is activated by p53, e.g., Pmaip1 (Noxa), Lrdd (Pidd), and Bbc3 (Puma), as well as the genes whose expression is normally repressed by p53, e.g., Egr1, Xrcc5 (Ku80), and Pold1 (21). Significantly, the expression of p21Waf1 (Cdkn1a), Mdm2, and Gadd45a, three genes that are commonly monitored to access p53 function, was not significantly altered by the K317R substitution (Table 2). Thus, our findings show for the first time that a specific modification at the C terminus of p53 can differentially affect the expression of p53-regulated genes and thus potentially affect the outcome of the cellular stress response. In this context, our previous studies have shown that phosphorylation at Ser18 in the N-terminal transactivation domain is required to regulate the expression of p53 target genes in a promoter-specific manner (9).
It remains to be established how K317 acetylation preferentially affects the proapoptotic p53 target genes. One possibility is that the requirements for the optimal binding of p53 to its response elements found in apoptosis-promoting genes differ from those of other classes of p53 target genes. In this context, the response elements of the proapoptotic genes exhibit greater deviation from the p53 consensus pattern and fail to function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae-based reporter assays, while response elements from cell cycle arrest and DNA repair-associated genes conform better to the consensus pattern and also function in the yeast-based assay (46). Alternatively or additionally, the involvement of K317 acetylation in disrupting the recruitment of coactivators to the promoters of proapoptotic and cell cycle arrest-associated genes may be different. In this context, an extensive study of transcriptional regulation of the human p21Waf1 (Cdnk1a) and FAS (Tnfrsf6) promoters revealed distinct patterns of p53-dependent and -independent behaviors of the basal transcriptional machinery that differed at the two promoters (16, 18).
The finding that expression of the oncoproteins E1A and Ras recapitulates the increased apoptosis seen in the p53K317R tissues is also suggestive. The deregulation of the E2F transcription factors through the binding of the adenovirus E1A protein to Rb is fundamental to the process of viral transfection (20). E2F1 binds to p53 and promotes p53-dependent apoptosis (32). Furthermore, E2F1 is a transcriptional activator of several proapoptotic cofactors of p53, including ASPP1 and TP53INP1 (32). A second well-studied aspect of E1A is its disruption of the interaction between PCAF and p300/CBP through the preferential binding of E1A to p300/CBP (12). In response to DNA damage, PCAF also acetylates E2F1, resulting in increased stability and activity as a transcriptional activator (23). Therefore, the intrinsic weakness of p53 binding to its response elements in the promoters of proapoptotic genes, the differences in the regulation of basal transcription of these genes, and the effects of proapoptotic cofactors of p53 all might contribute to the observed differential regulation of p53 target proapoptotic and cell cycle arrest-promoting genes in p53K317R cells after DNA damage.
. . . . . .
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Barlev, N. A., L. Liu, N. H. Chehab, K. Mansfield, K. G. Harris, T. D. Halazonetis, and S. L. Berger. 2001. Acetylation of p53 activates transcription through recruitment of coactivators/histone acetyltransferases. Mol. Cell 8:1243-1254.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Bell, S., C. Klein, L. Muller, S. Hansen, and J. Buchner. 2002. p53 contains large unstructured regions in its native state. J. Mol. Biol. 322:917-927.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Borges, H. L., C. Chao, Y. Xu, R. Linden, and J. Y. Wang. 2004. Radiation-induced apoptosis in developing mouse retina exhibits dose-dependent requirement for ATM phosphorylation of p53. Cell Death Differ. 11:494-502.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Brooks, C. L., and W. Gu. 2006. p53 ubiquitination: Mdm2 and beyond. Mol. Cell 21:307-315.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Brugarolas, J., C. Chandrasekaran, J. I. Gordon, D. Beach, T. Jacks, and G. J. Hannon. 1995. Radiation-induced cell cycle arrest compromised by p21 deficiency. Nature 377:552-557.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Bulavin, D. V., O. N. Demidov, S. Saito, P. Kauraniemi, C. Phillips, S. A. Amundson, C. Ambrosino, G. Sauter, A. R. Nebreda, C. W. Anderson, A. Kallioniemi, A. J. Fornace, Jr., and E. Appella. 2002. Amplification of PPM1D in human tumors abrogates p53 tumor-suppressor activity. Nat. Genet. 31:210-215.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Candau, R., D. M. Scolnick, P. Darpino, C. Y. Ying, T. D. Halazonetis, and S. L. Berger. 1997. Two tandem and independent sub-activation domains in the amino terminus of p53 require the adaptor complex for activity. Oncogene 15:807-816.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Chao, C., M. Hergenhahn, M. D. Kaeser, Z. Wu, S. Saito, R. Iggo, M. Hollstein, E. Appella, and Y. Xu. 2003. Cell type- and promoter-specific roles of Ser18 phosphorylation in regulating p53 responses. J. Biol. Chem. 8:8.
10. Chao, C., S. Saito, C. W. Anderson, E. Appella, and Y. Xu. 2000. Phosphorylation of murine p53 at Ser-18 regulates the p53 responses to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:11936-11941.
11. Chao, C., S. Saito, J. Kang, C. W. Anderson, E. Appella, and Y. Xu. 2000. p53 transcriptional activity is essential for p53-dependent apoptosis following DNA damage. EMBO J. 19:4967-4975.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Chinnadurai, G. 2004. Modulation of oncogenic transformation by the human adenovirus E1A C-terminal region. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 273:139-161.[Medline]
13. Chuikov, S., J. K. Kurash, J. R. Wilson, B. Xiao, N. Justin, G. S. Ivanov, K. McKinney, P. Tempst, C. Prives, S. J. Gamblin, N. A. Barlev, and D. Reinberg. 2004. Regulation of p53 activity through lysine methylation. Nature 432:353-360.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Deng, C., P. Zhang, J. W. Harper, S. J. Elledge, and P. Leder. 1995. Mice lacking p21CIP1/WAF1 undergo normal development, but are defective in G1 checkpoint control. Cell 82:675-684.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. el-Deiry, W. S., J. W. Harper, P. M. O'Connor, V. E. Velculescu, C. E. Canman, J. Jackman, J. A. Pietenpol, M. Burrell, D. E. Hill, Y. Wang, et al. 1994. WAF1/CIP1 is induced in p53-mediated G1 arrest and apoptosis. Cancer Res. 54:1169-1174.
16. Espinosa, J. M., R. E. Verdun, and B. M. Emerson. 2003. p53 functions through stress- and promoter-specific recruitment of transcription initiation components before and after DNA damage. Mol. Cell 12:1015-1027.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Feng, L., T. Lin, H. Uranishi, W. Gu, and Y. Xu. 2005. Functional analysis of the roles of posttranslational modifications at the p53 C terminus in regulating p53 stability and activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:5389-5395.
18. Gomes, N. P., G. Bjerke, B. Llorente, S. A. Szostek, B. M. Emerson, and J. M. Espinosa. 2006. Gene-specific requirement for P-TEFb activity and RNA polymerase II phosphorylation within the p53 transcriptional program. Genes Dev. 20:601-612.
19. Gu, W., and R. G. Roeder. 1997. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell 90:595-606.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Helt, A. M., and D. A. Galloway. 2003. Mechanisms by which DNA tumor virus oncoproteins target the Rb family of pocket proteins. Carcinogenesis 24:159-169.
21. Ho, J., and S. Benchimol. 2003. Transcriptional repression mediated by the p53 tumour suppressor. Cell Death Differ. 10:404-408.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Hollstein, M., D. Sidransky, B. Vogelstein, and C. C. Harris. 1991. p53 mutations in human cancers. Science 253:49-53.
23. Ianari, A., R. Gallo, M. Palma, E. Alesse, and A. Gulino. 2004. Specific role for p300/CREB-binding protein-associated factor activity in E2F1 stabilization in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 279:30830-30835.
24. Imbriano, C., A. Gurtner, F. Cocchiarella, S. Di Agostino, V. Basile, M. Gostissa, M. Dobbelstein, G. Del Sal, G. Piaggio, and R. Mantovani. 2005. Direct p53 transcriptional repression: in vivo analysis of CCAAT-containing G2/M promoters. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3737-3751.
25. Jeffers, J. R., E. Parganas, Y. Lee, C. Yang, J. Wang, J. Brennan, K. H. MacLean, J. Han, T. Chittenden, J. N. Ihle, P. J. McKinnon, J. L. Cleveland, and G. P. Zambetti. 2003. Puma is an essential mediator of p53-dependent and -independent apoptotic pathways. Cancer Cell 4:321-328.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Jimenez, G. S., M. Nister, J. M. Stommel, M. Beeche, E. A. Barcarse, X. Q. Zhang, S. O'Gorman, and G. M. Wahl. 2000. A transactivation-deficient mouse model provides insights into trp53 regulation and function. Nat. Genet. 26:37-43.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Johnson, T. M., E. M. Hammond, A. Giaccia, and L. D. Attardi. 2005. The p53QS transactivation-deficient mutant shows stress-specific apoptotic activity and induces embryonic lethality. Nat. Genet. 37:145-152.[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Kaustov, L., G. S. Yi, A. Ayed, E. Bochkareva, A. Bochkarev, and C. H. Arrowsmith. 2006. p53 transcriptional activation domain: a molecular chameleon? Cell Cycle 5:489-494.[Medline]
29. Ko, L. J., and C. Prives. 1996. p53: puzzle and paradigm. Genes Dev. 10:1054-1072.
30. Krummel, K. A., C. J. Lee, F. Toledo, and G. M. Wahl. 2005. The C-terminal lysines fine-tune P53 stress responses in a mouse model but are not required for stability control or transactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:10188-10193.
31. Kujoth, G. C., A. Hiona, T. D. Pugh, S. Someya, K. Panzer, S. E. Wohlgemuth, T. Hofer, A. Y. Seo, R. Sullivan, W. A. Jobling, J. D. Morrow, H. Van Remmen, J. M. Sedivy, T. Yamasoba, M. Tanokura, R. Weindruch, C. Leeuwenburgh, and T. A. Prolla. 2005. Mitochondrial DNA mutations, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in mammalian aging. Science 309:481-484.
32. La Thangue, N. B. 2003. The yin and yang of E2F-1: balancing life and death. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:587-589.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Li, M., J. Luo, C. L. Brooks, and W. Gu. 2002. Acetylation of p53 inhibits its ubiquitination by Mdm2. J. Biol. Chem. 277:50607-50611.
34. Lin, T., C. Chao, S. Saito, S. J. Mazur, M. E. Murphy, E. Appella, and Y. Xu. 2005. p53 induces differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by suppressing Nanog expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:165-171.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Lin, Y., W. Ma, and S. Benchimol. 2000. Pidd, a new death-domain-containing protein, is induced by p53 and promotes apoptosis. Nat. Genet. 26:122-127.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Liu, L., D. M. Scolnick, R. C. Trievel, H. B. Zhang, R. Marmorstein, T. D. Halazonetis, and S. L. Berger. 1999. p53 sites acetylated in vitro by PCAF and p300 are acetylated in vivo in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1202-1209.
37. Lowe, S. W., H. E. Ruley, T. Jacks, and D. E. Housman. 1993. p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell 74:957-967.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Merritt, A. J., C. S. Potten, C. J. Kemp, J. A. Hickman, A. Balmain, D. P. Lane, and P. A. Hall. 1994. The role of p53 in spontaneous and radiation-induced apoptosis in the gastrointestinal tract of normal and p53-deficient mice. Cancer Res. 54:614-617.
39. Michael, D., and M. Oren. 2002. The p53 and Mdm2 families in cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12:53-59.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Mirza, A., Q. Wu, L. Wang, T. McClanahan, W. R. Bishop, F. Gheyas, W. Ding, B. Hutchins, T. Hockenberry, P. Kirschmeier, J. R. Greene, and S. Liu. 2003. Global transcriptional program of p53 target genes during the process of apoptosis and cell cycle progression. Oncogene 22:3645-3654.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Moll, U. M., S. Wolff, D. Speidel, and W. Deppert. 2005. Transcription-independent proapoptotic functions of p53. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17:631-636.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Murphy, M., J. Ahn, K. K. Walker, W. H. Hoffman, R. M. Evans, A. J. Levine, and D. L. George. 1999. Transcriptional repression by wild-type p53 utilizes histone deacetylases, mediated by interaction with mSin3a. Genes Dev. 13:2490-2501.
43. Murphy, M. E. 2003. The thousand doors that lead to death: p53-dependent repression and apoptosis. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2:381-382.[Medline]
44. Nakamura, S., J. A. Roth, and T. Mukhopadhyay. 2000. Multiple lysine mutations in the C-terminal domain of p53 interfere with MDM2-dependent protein degradation and ubiquitination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:9391-9398.
45. Oren, M. 2003. Decision making by p53: life, death and cancer. Cell Death Differ. 10:431-442.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Qian, H., T. Wang, L. Naumovski, C. D. Lopez, and R. K. Brachmann. 2002. Groups of p53 target genes involved in specific p53 downstream effects cluster into different classes of DNA binding sites. Oncogene 21:7901-7911.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Renzing, J., and D. P. Lane. 1995. p53-dependent growth arrest following calcium phosphate-mediated transfection of murine fibroblasts. Oncogene 10:1865-1868.[Medline]
48. Resnick-Silverman, L., S. St. Clair, M. Maurer, K. Zhao, and J. J. Manfredi. 1998. Identification of a novel class of genomic DNA-binding sites suggests a mechanism for selectivity in target gene activation by the tumor suppressor protein p53. Genes Dev. 12:2102-2107.
49. Rodriguez, M. S., J. M. Desterro, S. Lain, D. P. Lane, and R. T. Hay. 2000. Multiple C-terminal lysine residues target p53 for ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:8458-8467.
50. Sakaguchi, K., J. E. Herrera, S. Saito, T. Miki, M. Bustin, A. Vassilev, C. W. Anderson, and E. Appella. 1998. DNA damage activates p53 through a phosphorylation-acetylation cascade. Genes Dev. 12:2831-2841.
51. Terui, T., K. Murakami, R. Takimoto, M. Takahashi, K. Takada, T. Murakami, S. Minami, T. Matsunaga, T. Takayama, J. Kato, and Y. Niitsu. 2003. Induction of PIG3 and NOXA through acetylation of p53 at 320 and 373 lysine residues as a mechanism for apoptotic cell death by histone deacetylase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 63:8948-8954.
52. Villunger, A., E. M. Michalak, L. Coultas, F. Mullauer, G. Bock, M. J. Ausserlechner, J. M. Adams, and A. Strasser. 2003. p53- and drug-induced apoptotic responses mediated by BH3-only proteins Puma and Noxa. Science 302:1036-1038.
53. Wang, H., R. Cao, L. Xia, H. Erdjument-Bromage, C. Borchers, P. Tempst, and Y. Zhang. 2001. Purification and functional characterization of a histone H3-lysine 4-specific methyltransferase. Mol. Cell 8:1207-1217.[CrossRef][Medline]
54. Xirodimas, D. P., M. K. Saville, J. C. Bourdon, R. T. Hay, and D. P. Lane. 2004. Mdm2-mediated NEDD8 conjugation of p53 inhibits its transcriptional activity. Cell 118:83-97.[CrossRef][Medline]
55. Xu, Y. 2003. Regulation of p53 responses by post-translational modifications. Cell Death Differ. 10:400-403.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|