Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2006, p. 7103-7115, Vol. 26, No. 19
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.00424-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Oleg Yu Tyrsin,1,
Chaomei Xiang,1,
Verena Pfeiffer,1
Sandra Pleiser,1
Stefan Wiese,2
Rudolf Götz,1 and
Ulf R. Rapp1*
Institut für Medizinische Strahlenkunde und Zellforschung, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Versbacher-Str. 5, D-97078 Würzburg, Germany,1 Institut für Klinische Neurobiologie, Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Josef Schneider-Str. 11, D-97078 Würzburg, Germany2
Received 10 March 2006/ Returned for modification 4 May 2006/ Accepted 3 July 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Knock-in experiments support an important role of C-RAF in apoptosis suppression (6, 18, 53). The presence of multiple interaction partners of RAF that have been implicated in the control of apoptosis (36) and genetic experiments (18, 24, 48) raise the possibility that modulation of C-RAF kinase activity in survival depends on interaction with a different set of proteins, including Bcl-2 and Bag1 (11, 12, 43, 44). A-RAF, the least well-characterized member of the family, appears to have the lowest specific activity for MEK (32, 51), although it clearly functions as a transforming gene and activates the mitogenic cascade when overexpressed in an activated form (17, 41). Moreover, like B- and C-RAF, A-RAF activation is coupled to stimulation of growth factor receptors such as nerve growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptors and expression of activated variants of all three isozymes causes differentiation and neurite formation in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells (47).
Before determination of differentiated cell lineages in midgestation, C-RAF alone can fully compensate B-RAF function and vice versa (18, 24, 49, 50). Double knockout experiments demonstrate that A-RAF alone cannot compensate B- and C-RAF functions but raise the possibility of cooperation between A-RAF and either B- or C-RAF in rescue before midgestation (23, 48). During midgestation, cooperation of C- with B-RAF might be essential for full extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation and for survival activity (45, 48). No specific role has yet been assigned to B-RAF in mouse development after midgestation, when the majority of brain development occurs and when neurons express much higher levels of B-RAF than other cell types. Also, it is not clear whether B-RAF-mediated protection of endothelial cells from apoptosis is associated with its high MEK kinase activity or involves other pathways (3, 46).
To elucidate the role of B-RAF in brain development and in differentiated neurons, we wanted to obtain mice lacking B-RAF that overcome the E11.5/12.5 lethality. B-RAFKIN/KIN mice were created that express A-RAF under control of endogenous B-RAF promoter, and we expected that neurons would survive beyond the critical midgestation cell death phase. Because we had previously observed that B-RAF overexpression can mediate neurite outgrowth (47) and because B-RAF localizes to axons and dendrites in vivo (25), we wanted to study these aspects of B-RAF function in neuronal differentiation.
A-RAF expression under the B-RAF promoter rescued B-RAF-deficient embryos from endothelial apoptosis and allowed them to survive after midgestation. A fraction of these late-stage embryos survived to adulthood. Histological analysis demonstrated that A-RAF can substitute for B-RAF in mediating growth factor-dependent survival. Moreover, in the developing neocortex, impaired neuronal migration was observed in conjunction with disorganization of neuronal layering.
|
|
|---|
Tissue preparation and immunohistochemical analysis. Whole embryos at E10.5 to E16.5 and brains of E18.5 or postnatal mice were dissected into cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed overnight in fresh buffered 4% paraformaldehyde, and 7-µm paraffin serial sections were prepared. Deparaffinized sections were microwaved in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 5.5) and washed in PBS. Subsequently, the slides were incubated in peroxidase blocking solution (1.5% H2O2 in PBS) and preincubated for 30 min with blocking serum (5% goat or rabbit serum, 0.1% Triton in PBS). Primary antibodies were diluted in blocking serum and applied overnight at 4°C. The primary antibodies used were anti-caspase-3 activated polyclonal (1:100; Cell Signaling), anti-NeuN monoclonal (1:100; Chemicon), anti-MAP2 monoclonal (1:500; Abcam), anti-Nestin monoclonal (1:5; DSHB, Iowa), anti-Tuj1-ß monoclonal (1:100; Chemicon), anti-Brn-2 rabbit polyclonal (1:800; gift from M. Wegner), and anti-Reelin (1:1,000; Abcam). Immunolabeling was revealed by the indirect immunofluorescence procedure using Texas Red and Alexa-488-conjugated secondary antibodies purchased from Vector Labs and Molecular Probes, respectively, or by the avidin-biotin method. For primary cell culture of cortical neurons, cells from E14.5 mouse cerebral cortices were dissociated and seeded on poly-D-lysine and laminin-coated glass coverslips in neurobasal medium (Invitrogen) containing 500 µM glutamine, 2% B27 supplement (Invitrogen), and penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen). After 4 h in culture, cells were fixed and stained with anti-B-RAF antibodies specific for the N terminus (1:300; Santa Cruz).
BrdU labeling, immunodetection, and quantification. For the cell proliferation assay, pregnant females were injected intraperitoneally withbromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) (70 µg/g of body weight). After 2 h of labeling, embryos were removed, processed, and serially sectioned. The brain sections were incubated in 2 N HCl for 30 min at 37°C, neutralized in borate buffer (pH 8.5) for 25 min at room temperature, rinsed twice in PBS, and blocked with 3% nonfat milk for 3 h at room temperature. The sections were then incubated with an anti-BrdU monoclonal antibody (1:100; Molecular Probes) overnight at 4°C and rinsed twice in PBS, followed by incubation with an Alexa-488-conjugated secondary antibody (1:100; Molecular Probes). For each genotype, three embryos were analyzed at the indicated stages, and three or four nonadjacent sections at the level of the olfactory bulb were selected to determine the BrdU labeling index. This index was calculated by dividing the number of BrdU-positive nuclei by the total number of the nuclei identified in units of 200-µm-wide ventricular zone (VZ) in a x40 optical view of mutant and control cortical regions. For migration analysis in vivo, BrdU was injected at E14.5, and E17.5 parasagittal sections at the level of the olfactory bulb were used. At this level, the entire cortical region was divided in two parts: upper, at the level of the cortical plate (CP), and deep, at the level of the intermediate zone (IZ) and subventricular zone. The number of BrdU-labeled cells was counted and the relative distribution (as a percentage) in each layer was calculated.
Western blot analysis. Western blotting was performed from embryonic lysates according to standard methods. Tissue was lysed in ice-cold buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, and 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with a protease inhibitor mixture (Roche). Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) were boiled in Laemmli buffer, separated by 10% to 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels, and transferred to a 0.45-µm nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline plus 0.5% Tween 20 for 2 h at room temperature and then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody. The antibodies used were monoclonal anti-HA tag (anti-12CA5), polyclonal anti-ERK2, anti-B-RAF C terminus (Santa Cruz), and anti-A-RAF C terminus (Santa Cruz), each at a dilution of 1:1,000.
Transwell cell migration assay. Migration of dissociated cerebral cortex neurons from E14.5 embryos was assayed using a Boyden transwell system (5-µm pore size; Corning Costar Co.). Two hundred microliters of serum-free medium containing dissociated cortical neurons (2 x 105 cells/cm2) was added to the upper insert of a transwell in neurobasal medium. Prior to seeding, both sides of the transwell were coated with poly-D-lysine and laminin. In the bottom chamber, 500 µl of neurobasal medium with or without BDNF (10 ng/ml; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was added. Twenty-four hours after seeding, cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde, and cells attached to the upper side of the membrane were thoroughly scraped off with cotton swabs. Migrated neurons attached to the bottom side of the membranes were visualized with anti-Tuj1-ß fluorescence staining. Cell migration was determined by counting the total number of Tuj1-ß-positive cells on the bottom side of the membranes. Each experiment was done in duplicate; a total of four embryos of each genotype were investigated.
Statistical analysis. Data sets from independent experiments were pooled, and the results were expressed as means and standard deviations. Statistical significance between data sets was assessed by Student's t test and assigned when the P value was <0.05.
|
|
|---|
Western blot analysis of equal amounts of forebrain tissue extracts showed an up-regulation of both kinases at E16.5 compared to E12.5 and E14.5 (Fig. 1A). This observation may indicate that differentiating/mature neurons require higher levels of both kinases than neural progenitor cells. To substantiate this notion, we immunostained sagittal sections of the neocortex of E10.5 and E14.5 embryos with a B-RAF antibody. Homogeneous B-RAF expression in the whole ventricular zone, consisting mainly of progenitor cells, was observed at E10.5 (Fig. 1B, C). At E14.5, predominant B-RAF expression was seen in the IZ migrating neurons and the newly generated CP neurons (Fig. 1E). In higher-magnification pictures within the IZ, B-RAF protein seemed to be accumulated within the presumed leading process and adjacent cytoplasmic region, both thought to be important subcellular sites for neuronal migration (Fig. 1F, G). To further determine the subcellular distribution of B-RAF expression, cortical neurons were isolated from E14.5 forebrain and cultured on laminin for 4 h, fixed, and stained with an anti-B-RAF antibody. Localization of B-RAF was not only restricted to cell bodies but also occurred in the shaft of neurites in neurons with a single process (Fig. 1H).
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Expression
of B-RAF and A-RAF in embryonic forebrain. (A) Western blot
analysis of equal amounts of forebrain tissue extracts (20 µg)
shows up-regulation of both kinases at E16.5 compared to E12.5 and
E14.5. The two bands for B-RAF (arrowheads) correspond to the 97-kDa
and 94-kDa isoforms, respectively. Reprobing of the blot with an ERK2
antibody (lower panel) was used as a loading control. (B and C)
Immunostaining (red) of sagittal sections with an anti-B-RAF antibody
showed homogeneous B-RAF expression in the whole VZ at E10.5 (B). The
boxed area in panel B corresponds to the enlarged image in panel C.
(D) Note the absence of the B-RAF signal in the cortex in a
matching section from a B-RAF-deficient E10.5 embryo. (E)
B-RAF staining (red) of sagittal sections at E14.5; predominant B-RAF
expression is seen in neurons of the IZ and CP. (F)
Higher-magnification of B-RAF-stained (red) migrating neurons of IZ.
(G) Merged image of panel F with Nomarski differential
contrast. (H) Immunostaining for B-RAF (red) of cortical
neurons isolated from E14.5 forebrain and grown for 4 h on a
laminin substrate. Arrowhead indicates cell body; arrow shows
neurite. (I) Omission of the first antibody yielded no
specific staining; nuclei (DAPI) are blue. Scale bars, 200 µm
(B), 50 µm (C to E), 10 µm (F and G), 20 µm
(H and
I).
|
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Defects
in differentiation, proliferation, positioning, and survival of neural
cells in B-RAF-deficient forebrain. (A to D) In sagittal sections from
E10.5 and E12.5 WT and B-RAF-deficient embryos, early neurons were
identified by staining with Tuj1-ß antibody (red, arrowheads
indicate misplaced neurons). (E) Quantification of
Tuj1-ß-positive cells at E10.5. (F to I) Sections of WT (F and
H) and B-RAF-deficient (G and I) forebrain after a 2-h pulse in vivo
with BrdU, followed by immunohistochemistry (green). (J)
Quantification of BrdU-positive cells at E10.5. (K
to N) Analysis of mitoses using phosphorylated histone H3 (red)
staining of neuroepithelial progenitor cells. Mitotic cells are
observed outside the ventricular
apical surface in the B-RAF-deficient cortex (L and N) (arrowheads
indicate ectopic mitosis). (O) Quantification of phosphorylated histone
H3-stained cells. (Q) Apoptotic cells were identified by staining for
cleaved caspase-3 (red) in sagittal sections from the E12.5 forebrains
of B-RAF-deficient embryos. Note the colocalization (yellow to orange)
with the Tuj1-ß staining (green, merged images are shown). (P)
Note absence of cell death in an equivalent section from the wild-type
cortex. Scale bars, 50
µm.
|
Generation of mice carrying A-RAF in the B-RAF gene locus (B-RAFKIN/KIN mice). To elucidate the role of B-RAF in neocortex development after E12.5 without interfering with its role in cell survival, we designed and cloned a knock-in construct that expresses A-RAF under the control of the endogenous B-RAF genomic locus. To achieve this gene replacement, the cDNA encoding human A-RAF was inserted into the B-RAF locus. Since B-RAF has multiple splice forms and exon 3 is present in all of them (2), an in-frame fusion was made in the third exon of B-RAF, at the beginning of the conserved Ras binding domain (Fig. 3A). The resulting chimeric kinase of 738 amino acid residues (B-RAFKIN) combines the unique N-terminal part of B-RAF with the remainder of A-RAF (Fig. 3B). Southern blotting confirmed homologous recombination in seven targeted ES cell clones. The expression of the expected mRNA and the 87-kDa chimeric protein in the selected ES cell clones was confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR and Western blotting (data not shown). The neomycin resistance gene, flanked by loxP sites, did not interfere with the expression of chimeric kinase. Chimeric male mice produced from two independent ES clones transmitted the B-RAFKIN allele to their F1 offspring. The F1 heterozygous mice were obtained at a frequency expected for a recessive allele and displayed no visible phenotype, suggesting that there is no dominant negative function of the chimeric kinase.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Generation
of mice carrying A-RAF in the B-RAF gene locus
(B-RAFKIN/KIN
mice). (A) Targeting strategy to introduce human A-RAF cDNA
into the B-RAF locus. Restriction sites: B, BamHI; E,
EcoRI; N, NsiI; X, XhoI. Black bars indicate probes used for Southern
hybridization. The positions of the neomycin resistance gene (NEO) and
LoxP sites (arrows) are shown. (B) The expected chimeric
protein harbors 155 amino acids of the N-terminal part of mouse B-RAF
and the remainder of A-RAF. An HA tag was introduced at the C terminus
of the chimeric kinase. (C) Western blot analysis of E12.5
and E14.5 forebrain lysates, using an antibody specific for the C
terminus of B-RAF, revealed the absence of B-RAF protein in
B-RAFKIN/KIN
embryos (upper panel). After stripping of the antibody, the membrane
was reacted with an antibody specific for the C terminus of A-RAF
(middle panel). Reprobing of the blot (lower panel) with an ERK2
antibody was employed as a loading
control.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Genotyping
data from B-RAFkin/+
intercrosses in 129Sv/C57BL/6/CD-1 (1:1:2) background
|
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. B-RAFKIN/KIN
mice are rescued from lethality and endothelial apoptosis.
(A) Knock-in of A-RAF into the B-RAF locus
rescued embryos from death. Representative pictures of embryos and
3-week-old (P21) mice are shown. The developmental stages and genotypes
are indicated. (B to D) Absence of endothelial cell death around the
dorsal aorta (da) of WT (B) and
B-RAFKIN/KIN
(C) E11.5 embryos by immunohistochemistry for activated
caspase-3. In contrast, a
B-RAF/
embryo showed many dying endothelial cells (arrows) (D). Scale bars,
1,000 µm (A), 50 µm (B to
D).
|
B-RAFKIN/KIN mice are impaired in neocortical development. The survival activity of the B-RAFKIN/KIN allele was also evident in the embryonic cortex. Neurogenesis in the neocortex in mice starts at around E10.5 and lasts until E17. Tuj1-ß-positive neurons were present in the preplate of the neocortex at E10.5 (data not shown) and E13.5; no significant differences were found in the thickness and distribution of the Tuj1-ß-positive cell layers in B-RAFKIN/KIN compared to WT littermates at this stage (Fig. 5A and B). Quantitative comparison showed similar numbers of Tuj1-ß cells in B-RAFKIN/KIN and WT embryos (data not shown). The progressive change in the intensity of Tuj1-ß expression defines the degree of maturation of these layers. The higher expression levels of Tuj1-ß in SP and molecular layer, compared to CP, allowed us to determine the thickness of cortical layers in E16.5 B-RAFKIN/KIN and WT embryos (Fig. 5C and E). While the distance between the upper boundary of the SP and the pial surface was reduced nearly twofold (127 µm in B-RAFKIN/KIN embryos compared with 246 µm in the control cortex), the total width was reduced by only 16% (497 µm in B-RAFKIN/KIN embryos compared with 592 µm in the control cortex). In addition, the clear boundary between SP and IZ obvious in WT embryos (Fig. 5C) was not visible between SP and IZ in B-RAFKIN/KIN embryos (Fig. 5E). Instead, many neurons were present in the IZ in B-RAFKIN/KIN embryos, indicating that the cells were impaired in their migration toward the CP (Fig, 5E).
![]() View larger version (60K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Cortical
pathology in
B-RAFKIN/KIN
embryos. (A and B) Tuj1-ß immunostaining (red) of sagittal
sections labels neurons in the preplate of the WT (A) and
mutant
B-RAFKIN/KIN
(B) E13.5 neocortex. (C to F) Tuj1-ß immunostaining
(red) and DAPI (blue) staining in sagittal sections of E16.5 cortices.
Note that the CP is thinner in the
B-RAFKIN/KIN
cortex (E and F) than in the WT cortex (C and D) and that the number of
Tuj1-ß-positive cells in the IZ, beneath the SP, is increased
in the
B-RAFKIN/KIN
neocortex (E). Scale bars, 100
µm.
|
![]() View larger version (124K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Cortical
pathology in
B-RAFKIN/KIN
postnatal cortex. (A and B) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of
WT and
B-RAFKIN/KIN
mutant sagittal sections of the P19 cortex. Cell layers I to VI are
indicated. (C to F) Immunohistochemistry in sagittal sections for NeuN,
a nuclear protein expressed in all mature neurons (C and D) and Brn-2,
a marker for pyramidal neurons (E and F). (G and H) MAP2 staining in
sagittal cortex sections is indicative of a loss of dendritic
fasciculation (arrowheads) in layers II and III of mutant cortex. Scale
bars: A to F, 100 µm; G and H, 50
µm.
|
Reduced proliferation of late progenitor cells in B-RAFKIN/KIN cortex. There was no increase in apoptosis in the B-RAFKIN/KIN cortex from E13.5 to postnatal day 19 (data not shown). In fact, there was even an increase in cell density in SP and IZ, as deduced from 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and Tuj1-ß staining, in B-RAFKIN/KIN embryos at E16.5 (Fig. 5E and F). Therefore, we could exclude increased cell death as the cause for the apparent loss of Brn-2-positive neurons in the postnatal cortex. We next examined the proliferation of cortical progenitor cells by in vivo labeling with BrdU (Fig. 7A to G). Up to E13.5, there was no significant difference in the number of BrdU-labeled cells in the VZ of B-RAFKIN/KIN embryos compared with WT (Fig. 7A, B, and G). A slightly reduced cell proliferation in the VZ of the B-RAFKIN/KIN neocortex was observed at E14.5 that further decreased at E16.5 (Fig. 7C to G). These results indicate that B-RAF has an essential role in the proliferation of late cortical progenitor cells and that the reduction in cortical cell production could be one cause of the hypoplastic cortex seen in the B-RAFKIN/KIN postnatal brain.
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Reduced
cell proliferation in late progenitor cells in
B-RAFKIN/KIN
neocortex. (A to F) E10.5 to E16.5 sagittal sections of the developing
cortex after a 2-h pulse in vivo with BrdU, followed by fluorescent
staining (green) with an antibody against BrdU. Note impaired
proliferation starting at E14.5 in
B-RAFKIN/KIN
embryos. The developmental stages and genotypes are indicated.
(G) Quantification of BrdU-positive cells. Scale bars, 50
µm (A and B), 100 µm (C to
F).
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Impaired
migration of cortical neurons in
B-RAFKIN/KIN
mice. (A and B) BrdU immunofluorescence in E17.5 sagittal sections.
(C) Quantification of BrdU-positive cells (mean ±
standard deviation) showed a change in the ratio of cells present in
pia-proximal (CP) and subventricular-proximal (IZ/subventricular zone)
neocortex (n = 3; P < 0.001,
t test). (D and E) Brn-2 immunostaining of sagittal sections
from E18.5 cortex of WT and
B-RAFKIN/KIN
embryos. Notably, Brn-2-stained cells were present in the central
region of the cortex in
B-RAFKIN/KIN
embryos compared to their location close to the pia in WT embryos. (F
to I) Nestin staining in E13.5 and E16.5 of
B-RAFKIN/KIN
embryos compared with WT showed a comparable number of radial glia
cells and their fibers between both genotypes. (J to M) Reelin staining
in E13.5 and E16.5
B-RAFKIN/KIN
embryos compared with WT revealed similar numbers of Cajal-Retzius
neurons and expression of the guidance cue Reelin. The developmental
stages and genotypes are indicated. Scale bars, 100 µm (A to
E), 50 µm (F to
M).
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. B-RAF
is required for BDNF-mediated cortical neuron migration. (A)
Schematic representation of Boyden transwell chamber used for the
migration assays of dissociated cortex neurons. (B to E) TuJ1-ß
immunostaining of cortical neurons that had migrated onto the bottom
side of the transwell membrane. Dissociated cortical neurons (E14.5)
isolated from WT embryos (B and D) and
B-RAFKIN/KIN
(C and E) were placed into the upper well of a Boyden chamber in the
absence (B and C) or presence (D and E) of 10 ng/ml BDNF in
the bottom
chamber. (F) Twenty-four hours after seeding, the total number of
migrating cells, stained with TuJ1-ß, was quantified. Each
assay was done in duplicate from at least four embryos of each
genotype. Scale bars, 50 µm (B to
E).
|
|
|
|---|
Apoptosis suppression by A-RAF.
The organs of
B-RAFKIN/KIN mice appeared normal and
proportional to body size, excluding the thymus and spleen, which were
reduced 10-fold in weight compared to wild-type littermates, indicating
the need for B-RAF-specific function in hematopoiesis. Typing for
lymphoid and myeloid lineages suggests deficiencies at the level of
early progenitor cells (U. Bommhardt, L. Nitschke, and U.
R. Rapp, unpublished). Only recently, the interaction of
neural stem cells with their local extracellular microenvironment or
niche has been investigated. It has become clear that neural stem cell
expansion and differentiation are regulated in vivo and in vitro by
environmental factors synthesized in the stem cell niche. In the
developing central nervous system, ventricular zone cells produce
vascular endothelial growth factor, which attracts vessel growth toward
them (4). It has also been
shown in coculture experiments that endothelial cells stimulate
self-renewal and induce neurogenesis of neural stem cells in vitro
(39). Thus, loss of
endothelial cells in the niche populated by neural stem cells would be
expected to adversely affect proliferation of neural stem cells and
their ability to differentiate into neurons. Loss of signaling caused
by death of endothelial cells in B-RAF-deficient mouse embryos might
contribute to the increased rate of apoptosis of differentiating
neurons in the forebrain at E10.5. Besides suppression of
apoptosis in endothelial cells by A-RAF in
B-RAFKIN/KIN mice, two other neuronal cell types
that undergo apoptosis when B-RAF is missing were rescued in
B-RAFKIN/KIN animals: cortical neurons and
motoneurons. Three possibilities may be envisioned for how A-RAF,
expressed from the B-RAF promoter and therefore under physiological
regulation, might protect from cell death. First, an A-RAF-specific
function in apoptosis suppression could be at play. It was
described that the N-terminal part of A-RAF specifically interacts with
two mitochondrial proteins, hTOM and hTIM, which are similar to
components of mitochondrial outer and inner membrane protein-import
receptors from lower organisms. Moreover, it was reported that A-RAF is
imported into mitochondria via a system for isoform-specific uptake
(52). Rescue of
B-RAF-deficient mice from endothelial apoptosis may be related to such
mitochondrial activity of chimeric A-RAF. Indeed, our preliminary
results demonstrate the ability of recombinant A-RAF from SF9 insect
cells to directly phosphorylate proapoptotic BH3-only protein BAD in
vitro (unpublished data). Another explanation for the antiapoptotic
function of B-RAFKIN kinase may be a cooperation between
A-RAF and C-RAF. Early evidence for B-RAF/C-RAF cooperation through
heterodimer formation
(42,
45,
48) has recently been
confirmed in an elegant series of experiments
(8). In addition, there is
also genetic evidence for A-RAF/C-RAF cooperation
(23,
48). Recent studies
demonstrated an important role for C-RAF in protection of
vascular endothelial cells from apoptosis via its action on
two distinct signaling pathways: (i) through vascular
endothelial growth factor-mediated ERK activation and (ii)
through basic fibroblast growth factor-mediated accumulation of C-RAF
at mitochondria instrumental for the antiapoptotic activity of C-RAF
(1,
16). A third possible
explanation for the antiapoptotic function of chimeric A-RAF which
harbors the N-terminal 155 amino acids of B-RAF might be due
to the survival function of a B-RAF effector activated by this
N-terminal domain. A candidate for this role is PA28
, a
subunit of the 11S regulator of proteasomes, known to specifically
interact with B-RAF N terminus
(19). The connection
between proteasomal activity and apoptosis has been described.
Dependent on the cellular background, programmed cell death was induced
or inhibited by the proteosomal inhibitor lactacystin
(13,
13,
38). Neurons were
previously shown by us to specifically require B-RAF function for
responsiveness to neurotrophic factors
(46). C-RAF could not
compensate for the loss of B-RAF. The basis for the different finding
with A-RAF may be A-RAF/C-RAF heterodimer formation analogous to
B-/C-RAF heterodimers that we have described earlier
(45). Such heterodimers
might be formed due to the presence of the N-terminal part of B-RAF in
the fusion protein overexpressed in the
B-RAFKIN/KIN mice and allow the B-RAF function to
be partially complemented, e.g., in mitochondria. If this would be the
case, A-/C-RAF dimers but not C-RAF homodimers would be predicted to
couple neurotrophic receptors to the mitogenic cascade and/or survival
signaling at the mitochondria.
Role of B-RAF in neuronal migration. The cortex is formed through the coordinated processes of neurogenesis and migration. Loss of B-RAF led to a severe reduction of Brn-2 expressing pyramidal projection neurons in the upper layers of the postnatal cortex and most dramatically in the somatosensory and visual cortex (Fig. 6F). This observation was puzzling in light of the finding that, at E18.5, the number of Brn-2-positive cells was not reduced (Fig. 8E), although they were misplaced. Conceivably, the "improper" environment distant from the pia might have induced a down-regulation of Brn-2 expression, leading in consequence also to a loss of dendrite formation. In melanoma cells, Brn-2 has been shown to be activated either by B-RAF (10) or by Wnt signaling (9). In cortical neurons, Brn-2 controls in a cell autonomous manner the expression of p35, a regulatory subunit of Cdk5 (22), and the signal transducer Dab (40) and thereby mediates migration of cortical neurons. Two different modes of radial migration have been described for newly generated neurons (26). In somal translocation, neurons move their cell soma toward a leading process that is stably attached to the pial surface. Later on during embryogenesis, when the cortex has grown in size, neurons move by locomotion along radial glial fibers. Based on the timing of the histological defects and misplaced neurons, we conclude that migration by locomotion is impaired in neurons lacking B-RAF. Starting at E14.5, we observed a reduction in proliferation and migration, indicating that these cellular activities are dependent on B-RAF. Four distinct phases have been discerned in locomotion at this time of corticogenesis: initial radial migration, arrest of migration in the subventricular zone, migration back toward the ventricle, and finally, secondary migration to the appropriate layer (27). What step in migration is specifically impaired cannot be concluded from static histological analysis but would require time-lapse imaging of slice cultures. In contrast to neurons, lack of B-RAF in fibroblasts led to an increase in migration, in conjunction with reduced levels of F-actin which have been proposed to act through reduced ROCKII expression and impaired phosphorylation of cofilin (31). We have recently uncovered a role of C-RAF in cell migration (33). This work has identified prohibitin as an essential component of MEK/ERK signaling in epithelial cell adhesion and migration. In the absence of prohibitin, the C-RAF kinase fails to become activated downstream of Ras, so that the cells remain adhered very tightly and epidermal growth factor no longer induces cell migration. Considering that cortical neurons migrate along radial glial fibers and that their migration modes are more complex than those of fibroblast cells, the mechanistic details of how B-RAF controls cortical migration remain to be elucidated. In summary, we have shown that the survival function of B-RAF is replaced by that of A-RAF in several cell systems but A-RAF does not fully substitute for B-RAF in neuronal migration and dendrite formation, indicating a specific requirement for B-RAF in these processes.
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 581 TP B5, GK1048, and DAAD grant D/04/39971. G.C. was a postdoctoral fellow supported in part by the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Educación y Cultura).
These authors contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»