Molecular and Cellular Biology, January 2006, p. 727-734, Vol. 26, No. 2
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.26.2.727-734.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institut Curie, Inserm U528, Transduction Networks Analysis Group, Paris, France,1 Department of Cell Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas,2 CNRS UMR144, Institut Curie, Paris, France3
Received 24 April 2005/ Returned for modification 16 May 2005/ Accepted 21 October 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Perhaps related to their role(s) in tumor metastasis, Ral GTPases have been functionally implicated in the regulation of cell motility (2, 10, 20, 30). However, the mechanistic basis of this contribution is unknown. Ral has two well-documented effectors; RLIP76/RalBP1, a Rac/CDC42 Gap that presumably participates in the functional assembly of endocytosis machinery (13, 19), and the Sec6/8 or exocyst complex, which facilitates regulated exocytosis to regions of rapid membrane expansion (5, 17, 18, 23, 29).
To define the mechanistic contribution of Ral GTPases to cell motility and migration, we have employed small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated loss-of-function analysis to directly evaluate the relative contribution of RalA, RalB, and Ral effector pathways to support of this system. Neither RalA nor the RLIP76/RalBP1 effector pathway is limiting for cell motility. In contrast, RalB and the exocyst are both required. Depletion of either RalB or any of several exocyst subunits abolishes cell migration into a wounded monolayer or across a porous membrane. The mechanistic connection between RalB and exocyst function in this biological system is highlighted by the observation that RalB expression is required both to stabilize the assembly of the full heteroocomeric exocyst complex and to localize functional exocyst complexes to the leading edge of migrating cells.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Boyden chamber assay. The Boyden chamber assay was performed using transwell chambers with 8-µm-pore-size membranes (Biocat Cell Culture Inserts; Becton Dickinson). The chambers were inserted into 24-well culture plates containing culture medium with either with 0.5% or 10% serum. The cells (10 x 104) were loaded into the upper compartments of the Boyden chambers. Nonmigrated cells were removed with a cotton swab, and migrating cells were fixed and stained with 0.2% crystal violet in 20% ethanol for 30 min. Cells were lysed with 30% acetic acid, and absorbance was measured at 540 nm. The intensity of the color was directly proportional to the density of cells.
Immunofluorescence.
Classic methods were used with cells being fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized in 1% Triton X-100, and mounted using Mowiol. Primary antibodies were obtained from Stressgen (Sec6), Transduction Laboratory (Sec8), Cell Signaling (phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 [ERK1/2]) and UBI (ERK1/2), Molecular Probes (Cy3- or fluorescein isothiocyanate [FITC]-coupled phalloidin), and Sigma (
-tubulin). Secondary antibodies were from Jackson Laboratories and were coupled to FITC, Cy3, or Cy5. Anti-Sec5 sera were generated by immunization of rabbits with the Ral-binding domain of Sec5 fused to gluthathione S-transferase (25). Polyclonal antibodies against Sec10 were generated against a synthetic peptide derived from human Sec10 (positions 6 to 20) (25)
Biochemistry, immunoprecipitation, and immunodetection. For whole-cell extracts, cells were lysed directly on plates in hot Laemmli buffer. For immunoprecipitation, cells were lysed in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 1% Triton X-100, and 10% glycerol; antibodies were used at the concentrations recommended by suppliers for immunoprecipitation or for immunodetection on membranes. Proteins were visualized on membranes with a chemoluminescent detection system (ECL; Amersham). Quantifications were performed using the Las-1000plus Luminescent Image analyzer (Fuji) and Image Gauge software.
For "scratch tests," NRK cells were brought to confluence and scratched orthogonally at least 20 times with a p20-200 yellow tip. Cells were either further incubated for 1 or 3 h or harvested immediately. Preparation of cell extracts and the Ral trap experiments were performed according to published procedures (34). Leupeptin was from Sigma, MG132 was from Calbiochem, and concanamycin B was a gift from P. Benaroch.
siRNAs. siRNAs were transfected at 160 nM with Oligofectamine (Invitrogen) (8). SiRNA were ordered from Dharmacon, except those targeting Sec10 and Sec8 (Proligo). Target sequences were GUAGAGAGGACCAUGAUGU (RLIP76), GAGACAACUACUUCCGAAG (RalA+B), GGUUUCUGUAGAAGAGGCA (RalA), UGACGAGUUUGUAGAAGAC (RalB-2), ACGUGGACAAGGUGUUCUU (RalB-1), CGGCAGAAUGGAUGUCUGC (Sec5-1), GGUCGGAAAGACAAGGCAGAU (Sec5-2), CUGGAGGCAGAGCAUCAACAC (Sec6), ACAGUGUCCUCUUCGAGAG (Sec8), and UGAGUUUCUAGAUGGAGAA (Sec10).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
To examine if cell migratory cues impact the stability of the exocyst complex, a monolayer of confluent NRK cells was extensively scratched to maximize the number of "free edges" where cell-cell contacts were released. Given that Sec5 and Sec8 are found in the same membrane fraction in resting cells while Sec10 is in another (18), we examined the consequences of cell migration on Sec8/Sec5 and Sec8/Sec10 complex assembly. As shown in Fig. 5 and consistent with expectations from the results of Moskalenko et al. (17, 18), Sec8/Sec5 complex formation was unaffected by conditions promoting cell migration, while Sec8/Sec10 complex formation was enhanced.
|
RalB recruits the exocyst to the leading edge of migrating cells. Motile cells develop a region of rapid plasma membrane expansion (leading edge) oriented toward the direction of movement. We examined the distribution of the exocyst in motile cells using monoclonal antibodies that recognize endogenous Exo70 and Sec6. As shown in Fig. 6A and B, Exo70 and Sec6 were enriched at the leading edges of plasma membranes free of cell-cell contacts at the forefront of motile cells. These proteins were not detected on plasma membranes bordering adjacent cells. In all cells, Exo70 and Sec6 were also detected on perinuclear in vesicular structures. Neither Rab6 nor the transferrin receptor displayed enrichment on the leading edge of motile cells, suggesting the localization pattern observed for Exo70 and Sec6 is not an artifact of membrane ruffling. By 3 h, the clusters of Exo70- and Sec6-positive perinuclear vesicles were oriented toward the wound in the first row of cells. Endogenous Sec10 was also enriched at the plasma membrane facing the wound (data not shown).
|
Brefeldin A (BFA)-induced disruption of the Golgi apparatus inhibits migration, presumably as a consequence of blocking resupply of secretory vesicles (1). Given that the exocyst has been observed on both the Golgi apparatus and the plasma membrane (35), we examined the consequences of BFA exposure on Exo70 recruitment to the leading edge. Under conditions where BFA clearly blocked cells migration, Exo70 was still recruited to the leading edge of cells bordering a monolayer wound (Fig. 7). This observation suggests that the capacity of RalB to recruit the exocyst is independent of an intact Golgi apparatus and is consistent with the proposed involvement of the exocyst with regulation of vesicle recycling (14, 25).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Distinct roles for RalA and RalB in cell migration. siRNA-mediated depletion of RalA and RalB revealed that only the latter is a limiting factor for cells to maintain the capacity to migrate. To our surprise, depletion of RalA restored the loss of motility observed upon depletion of RalB. In this experiment, depletion of both GTPases together was as efficient as depletion of either alone, suggesting that reversing sensitivity to RalB siRNAs by RalA depletion is not simply a consequence of saturation of the RISC or other RNAi machinery. Suppression of RalB sensitivity in cells upon RalA depletion has also been observed in the context of cancer cell survival (7), as well as cancer cell migration (22). However, it remains to be determined if the mechanistic contribution of RalB to cell migration overlaps with its role in supporting cancer cell survival.
The exocyst is the RalB effector complex supporting cell migration. Ral GTPases have been implicated in vesicle trafficking both in the context of endocytosis through the effector RLIP76/RalBP1 and in the context of exocytosis through the effectors Sec5 and Exo84. We have shown here that RLIP76/RalBP1 is apparently dispensable, while the exocyst is a key component immediately downstream of RalB required for cell migration. The exocyst is thought to direct targeting and tethering of subclasses of secretory vesicles to their sites of fusion with the plasma membrane; it is required, together with Ral proteins, for the asymmetric localization of plasma membrane proteins in polarized cells (17), for receptor trafficking at the postsynaptic membrane (26), and for the extension of filopods on neuronal growth cones (12).
The immunofluorescence localization analysis of the exocyst in resting versus motile cells in this study reveals that the exocyst complex is dynamically recruited to plasma membrane subdomains that have been specified for rapid expansion and that this recruitment correlates with RalB activation and requires RalB expression. In cells organized in a monolayer, the exocyst subunits Sec6 and Exo70 were primarily asymmetrically localized in the perinuclear region and enriched in the vicinity of the Golgi. In motile cells, Sec6 and Exo70 were enriched at the leading edge of the "free" plasma membrane, as opposed to membrane engaged in cell-cell contacts. This "motility-induced" alteration in exocyst localization was dependent on RalB but not on RalA. The regulated subcellular recruitment of the exocyst we observe is consistent with its presence on other dynamic membranes, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha- or interleukin-1-induced filopods (29), and the leading edge of migrating osteoblasts (24).
The current "Ral-exocyst paradigm" (18) suggests that the exocyst is in equilibrium between hemicomplexes containing discrete subunits versus the octameric holocomplex. We find that this equilibrium is shifted toward the holocomplex in migrating cells and that this shift is RalB dependent. It remains to be determined if the contribution of RalB to exocyst localization and assembly is a consequence of a single or multiple RalB-dependent regulatory interactions.
Ral GTPases have been implicated in a variety of biological systems that may be expected to impact cell motility, including filamin-dependent modulation of the actin cytoskeleton (21, 27) and exocyst-dependent microtubule polymerization (32). In the system employed here, we did not detect any contribution of RalA or RalB to global actin cytoskeletal architecture or maintenance of the microtubule network (data not shown), suggesting that such perturbations are not likely to mediate the sensitivity of cell migration to RalB expression. In addition, serum-dependent ERK1/2 activation is unaffected by RalB depletion, reflecting intact receptor-mediated signal transduction cascades (data not shown). Finally, consistent with previous evaluation of the consequences RalB depletion in matrix-attached nontransformed cells (7), we observed no cell toxicity or inhibition of proliferation during the course of the experiments reported here. Taken together, these observations support the hypothesis that impaired migration upon RalB or exocyst depletion is due to an intrinsic contribution of the exocyst to cell motility, rather than to a global perturbation of cell homeostasis.
Concluding remarks. Cell migration requires de novo plasma membrane addition at the leading edge, and a driving role for vesicle trafficking in directional cell motility has been suggested (4). The observations described here help establish a mechanistic framework for the regulation of dynamic membrane expansion in motile cells. We propose that, upon local activation by the release of plasma membranes from cell-cell contacts, RalB acts to specify and constrain vesicle trafficking for directional cell movement through mobilization of the exocyst. This task is likely coordinated with the Rab-dependent and SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptor)-dependent machinery contributing to secretory vesicle dynamics, as well as other (macro)molecular machines involved in cell migration such as the protein kinase C zeta/Par3/Par6 complex. Potential molecular links between the exocyst and these systems are currently under investigation.
This conclusion does not exclude other eventually unidentified effectors of Ral as actors of migration but shows that the exocyst complex is definitively required.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to S. Hsu for providing anti-Exo70 monoclonal antibodies and to L. Feig, C. Marshall, P. Frankel, L. Quilliam, and M. Katan for reagents used during this work. We thank Dominique Morineau for his expert artwork, Chloé Camonis for film editing, and Nathalie Brandon, Marie Bourgeois, and Carole Gomez for skillful technical help. Fanny Momboisse was an efficient intern during the course of this work. We are very indebted to Franck Perez for stimulating discussions and suggestions, as well as to Jean de Gunzburg and to Julie Plastino for critical reading of the manuscript.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bhattacharya, M., P. H. Anborgh, A. V. Babwah, L. B. Dale, T. Dobransky, J. L. Benovic, R. D. Feldman, J. M. Verdi, R. J. Rylett, and S. S. Ferguson. 2002. Beta-arrestins regulate a Ral-GDS Ral effector pathway that mediates cytoskeletal reorganization. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:547-555.[Medline]
3. Boyd, C., T. Hughes, M. Pypaert, and P. Novick. 2004. Vesicles carry most exocyst subunits to exocytic sites marked by the remaining two subunits, Sec3p and Exo70p. J. Cell Biol. 167:889-901.
4. Bretscher, M. S., and C. Aguado-Velasco. 1998. Membrane traffic during cell locomotion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10:537-541.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Brymora, A., V. A. Valova, M. R. Larsen, B. D. Roufogalis, and P. J. Robinson. 2001. The brain exocyst complex interacts with RalA in a GTP-dependent manner: identification of a novel mammalian Sec3 gene and a second Sec15 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 276:29792-29797.
6. Camonis, J. H., and M. A. White. 2005. Ral GTPases: corrupting the exocyst in cancer cells. Trends Cell Biol. 15:327-332.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Chien, Y., and M. A. White. 2003. RAL GTPases are linchpin modulators of human tumour-cell proliferation and survival. EMBO Rep. 4:800-806.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Elbashir, S. M., J. Harborth, W. Lendeckel, A. Yalcin, K. Weber, and T. Tuschl. 2001. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature 411:494-498.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Feig, L. A. 2003. Ral-GTPases: approaching their 15 minutes of fame. Trends Cell Biol. 13:419-425.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Gildea, J. J., M. A. Harding, M. J. Seraj, K. M. Gulding, and D. Theodorescu. 2002. The role of Ral A in epidermal growth factor receptor-regulated cell motility. Cancer Res. 62:982-985.
11. Gonzalez-Garcia, A., C. A. Pritchard, H. F. Paterson, G. Mavria, G. Stamp, and C. J. Marshall. 2005. RalGDS is required for tumor formation in a model of skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Cell 7:219-226.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Hazuka, C. D., D. L. Foletti, S. C. Hsu, Y. Kee, F. W. Hopf, and R. H. Scheller. 1999. The sec6/8 complex is located at neurite outgrowth and axonal synapse-assembly domains. J. Neurosci. 19:1324-1334.
13. Jullien-Flores, V., Y. Mahe, G. Mirey, C. Leprince, B. Meunier-Bisceuil, A. Sorkin, and J. H. Camonis. 2000. RLIP76, an effector of the GTPase Ral, interacts with the AP2 complex: involvement of the Ral pathway in receptor endocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 113:2837-2844.[Abstract]
14. Langevin, J., M. J. Morgan, C. Rossé, V. Racine, J. B. Sibarita, S. Aresta, M. Murthy, T. Schwarz, J. Camonis, and Y. Bellaïche. 2005. Drosophila exocyst components Sec5, Sec6, and Sec15 regulate DE-cadherin trafficking from recycling endosomes to the plasma membrane. Dev. Cell 9:355-376.[Medline]
15. Lee, T., L. Feig, and D. J. Montell. 1996. Two distinct roles for Ras in a developmentally regulated cell migration. Development 122:409-418.[Abstract]
16. Lim, K. H., A. T. Baines, J. J. Fiordalisi, M. Shipitsin, L. A. Feig, A. D. Cox, C. J. Der, and C. M. Counter. 2005. Activation of RalA is critical for Ras-induced tumorigenesis of human cells. Cancer Cell 7:533-545.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Moskalenko, S., D. O. Henry, C. Rosse, G. Mirey, J. H. Camonis, and M. A. White. 2002. The exocyst is a Ral effector complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:66-72.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Moskalenko, S., C. Tong, C. Rosse, G. Mirey, E. Formstecher, L. Daviet, J. Camonis, and M. A. White. 2003. Ral GTPases regulate exocyst assembly through dual subunit interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 278:51743-51748.
19. Nakashima, S., K. Morinaka, S. Koyama, M. Ikeda, M. Kishida, K. Okawa, A. Iwamatsu, S. Kishida, and A. Kikuchi. 1999. Small G protein Ral and its downstream molecules regulate endocytosis of EGF and insulin receptors. EMBO J. 18:3629-3642.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Neuhaus, P., S. Oustanina, T. Loch, M. Krüger, E. Bober, R. Dono, R. Zeller, and T. Braun. 2003. Reduced mobility of fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-deficient myoblasts might contribute to dystrophic changes in the musculature of FGF2/FGF6/mdx triple-mutant mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6037-6048.
21. Ohta, Y., N. Suzuki, S. Nakamura, J. H. Hartwig, and T. P. Stossel. 1999. The small GTPase RalA targets filamin to induce filopodia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:2122-2128.
22. Oxford, G., C. R. Owens, B. J. Titus, T. L. Foreman, M. C. Herlevsen, S. C. Smith, and D. Theodorescu. 2005. RalA and RalB: antagonistic relatives in cancer cell migration. Cancer Res. 65:7111-7120.
23. Polzin, A., M. Shipitsin, T. Goi, L. A. Feig, and T. J. Turner. 2002. Ral-GTPase influences the regulation of the readily releasable pool of synaptic vesicles. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:1714-1722.
24. Prele, C. M., M. A. Horton, P. Caterina, and G. Stenbeck. 2003. Identification of the molecular mechanisms contributing to polarized trafficking in osteoblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 282:24-34.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Prigent, M., T. Dubois, G. Raposo, V. Derrien, D. Tenza, C. Rosse, J. Camonis, and P. Chavrier. 2003. ARF6 controls post-endocytic recycling through its downstream exocyst complex effector. J. Cell Biol. 163:1111-1121.
26. Sans, N., K. Prybylowski, R. S. Petralia, K. Chang, Y. X. Wang, C. Racca, S. Vicini, and R. J. Wenthold. 2003. NMDA receptor trafficking through an interaction between PDZ proteins and the exocyst complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:520-530.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Sawamoto, K., P. Winge, S. Koyama, Y. Hirota, C. Yamada, S. Miyao, S. Yoshikawa, M.-H. Jin, A. Kikuchi, and H. Okano. 1999. The Drosophila Ral GTPase regulates developmental cell shape changes through the Jun NH2-terminal kinase pathway. J. Cell Biol. 146:361-372.
28. Sriuranpong, V., A. Mutirangura, J. W. Gillespie, V. Patel, P. Amornphimoltham, A. A. Molinolo, V. Kerekhanjanarong, S. Supanakorn, P. Supiyaphun, S. Rangdaeng, N. Voravud, and J. S. Gutkind. 2004. Global gene expression profile of nasopharyngeal carcinoma by laser capture microdissection and complementary DNA microarrays. Clin. Cancer Res. 10:4944-4958.
29. Sugihara, K., S. Asano, K. Tanaka, A. Iwamatsu, K. Okawa, and Y. Ohta. 2001. The exocyst complex binds the small GTPase RalA to mediate filopodia formation. Nat. Cell Biol. 17:17.
30. Suzuki, J., Y. Yamazaki, G. Li, Y. Kaziro, and H. Koide. 2000. Involvement of Ras and Ral in chemotactic migration of skeletal myoblasts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:4658-4665.
31. Tchevkina, E., L. Agapova, N. Dyakova, A. Martinjuk, A. Komelkov, and A. Tatosyan. 2005. The small G-protein RalA stimulates metastasis of transformed cells. Oncogene 24:329-335.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Wang, S., Y. Liu, C. L. Adamson, G. Valdez, W. Guo, and S. C. Hsu. 2004. The mammalian exocyst, a complex required for exocytosis, inhibits tubulin polymerization. J. Biol. Chem. 279:35958-35966.
33. Ward, Y., W. Wang, E. Woodhouse, I. Linnoila, L. Liotta, and K. Kelly. 2001. Signal pathways which promote invasion and metastasis: critical and distinct contributions of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and Ral-specific guanine exchange factor pathways. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:5958-5969.
34. Wolthuis, R. M., B. Franke, M. van Triest, B. Bauer, R. H. Cool, J. H. Camonis, J. W. Akkerman, and J. L. Bos. 1998. Activation of the small GTPase Ral in platelets. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2486-2491.
35. Yeaman, C., K. K. Grindstaff, J. R. Wright, and W. J. Nelson. 2001. Sec6/8 complexes on trans-Golgi network and plasma membrane regulate late stages of exocytosis in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 155:593-604.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|