| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Département de Radiobiologie et Radiopathologie, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique,1 UMR 217 CNRS/CEA, 18 route du Panorama, F-92265 Fontenay aux Roses, France,2 Laboratoire Pierre Sue CEA-CNRS UMR 9956, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette, France3
Received 11 April 2006/ Returned for modification 5 June 2006/ Accepted 31 July 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cellular targets for ROS are numerous and include lipids, proteins, and DNA (12, 14, 33). A major product of ROS attack in genomic DNA is the premutagenic lesion 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), which causes G-to-T transversions (22, 34). The main defense against the mutagenic effect of 8-oxoG is the base excision repair pathway, which in eukaryotes is initiated by the OGG1 protein, a DNA glycosylase that catalyzes the excision of 8-oxoG from DNA (5). ROS-mediated accumulation of 8-oxoG was reported after cadmium treatment in a number of cell systems (17, 45). Not only could the oxidative stress generated by cadmium exposure yield oxidative DNA damage, but the heavy metal was also described as being an inhibitor of oxidative DNA repair pathways (11). In particular, exposure to cadmium was shown to reduce the 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase activity levels from extracts of both lung tissue from rats and rat lung cell lines (36, 37). These effects were associated with lower levels of protein expression. It was also shown in in vitro assays that cadmium is a direct and irreversible inhibitor of the mouse OGG1 protein (48). However, at present little is known concerning the effect of cadmium on the human OGG1 (hOGG1) protein activity. Only one study recently addressed this question, demonstrating that several hours' exposure of human cells to low cadmium doses reduced hOGG1 activity through a decrease in the hOGG1 gene expression at the transcriptional level (47). The present study aimed at establishing whether an acute exposure of human cells to a high cadmium concentration alters the 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase activity of hOGG1 and at clarifying the underlying mechanisms of Cd genotoxicity.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cadmium treatment. Cells were treated at a density of 1 x 106 cells/ml with cadmium chloride in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 min. They were washed twice in PBS and returned to the incubator in fresh medium. At different times during and after treatment they were washed in PBS by centrifugation and stored as dried pellets in liquid nitrogen until protein extraction.
Protein extraction. Cell extracts were obtained by sonication of cell pellets in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8; 250 mM NaCl; and a cocktail of aprotinin, antipain, and leupeptin (0.8 µg/ml each). The homogenate was centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was aliquoted and stored at 80°C for biochemical assays. Protein content was measured using a Bio-Rad assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA) with bovine serum albumin as a standard.
Intracellular cadmium determination. At different times during and after metal exposure cells were washed twice in PBS-EDTA (2 mM) and lysed in lysis buffer (Promega) at 4°C. Samples were treated with ultrapure 65% nitric acid (Normaton quality grade; VWR Prolabo) and diluted in ultrapure water. Cadmium concentration was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) using an X7 series quadrupole Thermo Elemental apparatus and related to the protein content. The ICP-MS apparatus was calibrated with a SPEX CertiPrep standard (Jobin Yvon, Longjumeau, France). Yttrium was used as an internal standard (1 ppb).
Determination of glutathione content. An aliquot of the 20,000 x g supernatant from the cell lysate was treated with an equal volume of 10% trichloroacetic acid. After centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C, total glutathione content was measured on the supernatant by the Tietze recycling assay (1). Oxidized glutathione (GSSG) was measured by the same method after derivatization of reduced glutathione using 2-vinylpyridine.
Purification of human OGG1. Glutathione S-transferase-tagged recombinant hOGG1 was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21. After induction, cells from 3 liters of culture (A600 of 2.3) were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended, and sonicated in 120 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer (25 mM phosphate sodium, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, 500 mM NaCl, pH 7.6) with antipain (2.5 µg/ml), aprotinin (2.5 µg/ml), leupeptin (2.5 µg/ml), and lysozyme (1 mg/ml). The lysate was centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was incubated with 7 ml of glutathione Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences) for 1 h at room temperature. The mixture was loaded on a column, and the resin was washed with 35 ml of lysis buffer and equilibrated with 35 ml of G0 buffer (25 mM phosphate sodium, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.6). Twenty-seven milligrams of glutathione S-transferase-OGG1 was eluted in the same buffer with 30 mM glutathione. The protein was dialyzed against G0 and incubated with 250 U of thrombin (Amersham Biosciences) overnight at room temperature. The digestion mix was diluted three times with 25 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6, and loaded on a 1-ml column of resource S (Amersham Biosciences). Cleaved hOGG1 was eluted with a linear NaCl gradient in phosphate buffer. Nine milligrams of recovered protein was diluted four times with 25 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.6, to 50 mM NaCl and loaded on a 1-ml Hitrap heparin column (Amersham Biosciences). hOGG1 was eluted with a linear NaCl gradient and collected at 400 mM NaCl. A 6.5-mg quantity of protein was obtained and conserved in 50% glycerol at 20°C.
8-OxoG DNA glycosylase assay.
A 34-mer oligonucleotide containing an 8-oxoguanine at position 16 was labeled at the 5' end using [
-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Biosciences) and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs). The 32P-labeled strand was hybridized to its complementary oligonucleotide containing a cytosine (C) opposite the lesion yielding the 8-oxo-G:C duplex. In a standard reaction mixture various amount of protein extracts or purified OGG1 (6-µl final volume) were added to a 9-µl reaction mixture containing 25 fmol of the 8-oxo-G:C-labeled duplex in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 6.8. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 25 min. NaOH (0.1 N final concentration) was added, and the mixtures were further incubated for 10 min at 37°C and stopped with formamide dye, followed by heating for 5 min at 95°C. The products of the reaction were resolved by denaturing 20% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (19:1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide). Gels were scanned, and band intensities were quantified using a Storm PhosphorImager (Amersham Bioscience).
Western blot analysis. Aliquots from cell extracts (50 µg) were denatured by being heated for 5 min at 95°C in either Laemmli buffer containing 100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) (reducing Western blot assay) or Laemmli buffer without DTT (nonreducing Western blot assay). After denaturation samples were electrophoresed on a 12.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked for 1 h with 5% nonfat dry milk in PBS-T (PBS with 0.1% Tween 20) and incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-human OGG1 (2) in 1% blocking reagent (Roche Diagnostic) for 2 h at room temperature. After three 15-min washes with PBS-T, the membrane was incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G antibody at a 1/20,000 dilution at room temperature. After three additional washing steps, the protein-antibody complexes were visualized by ECL (Amersham Biosciences).
Analysis of hOGG1 redox conformation. Purified hOGG1 was incubated for 30 min at 37°C with diamide or cadmium in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), precipitated by addition of 20% trichloroacetic acid (7.5% final concentration) for 15 min on ice, and centrifuged at 4°C at 16,000 x g for 20 min. After being washed with ice-cold acetone, the protein was incubated for 90 min at 30°C in 10 mM AMS (4-acetamido-4'-maleimidylstilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid), denatured in Laemmli buffer without DTT, electrophoresed on a 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel, and revealed using the Imperial Protein staining reagent (Pierce).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Cysteine modifications in hOGG1 modulate its activity. The above hypothesis implies that the 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase activity of hOGG1 can be modulated by oxidative alterations of the protein in response to the redox environment of the cell. In particular, cysteine residues, of which eight are present in hOGG1, are potential targets for oxidative modifications. We therefore examined whether OGG1 activity could be modulated by cysteine-modifying agents. The cysteine-blocking reagent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) strongly inhibited the 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase activity of either purified hOGG1 or whole untreated cell extracts in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6A). Moreover, while hydrogen peroxide had no effect, other oxidants such as nitric oxide donors (data not shown) and diamide (Fig. 6A) were also able to inhibit the enzymatic activity of hOGG1 both in purified material and in cell extracts. In the case of diamide the inhibition of the extract activity was stronger than that of the pure protein. This might reflect the amplification of the oxidative response by secondary oxidative chain reactions involving other cellular components such as lipids. Interestingly, the migration pattern of purified OGG1 protein after oxidation by diamide was similar to that found in cadmium-treated cells (compare lanes 6 and 7 from Fig. 6B with Fig. 5). To test for the redox status of the thiol groups, the purified protein treated with either diamide or Cd was incubated in the presence of AMS before being loaded in the gel. AMS modifies proteins by the addition of a bulky adduct on reduced cysteine residues, causing a shift towards higher-molecular-weight forms. Figure 6B shows that exposure to diamide previous to AMS treatment blocks adduct formation, resulting in a protein with a lower molecular weight (lanes 2 to 4) compared to the completely reduced protein (lane 1). This confirms the oxidation of cysteine moieties by diamide. More important, Cd treatment of purified hOGG1 did not block the modification of cysteines by AMS (lane 5), implying that the metal does not directly oxidize the protein.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As is the case for the mouse enzyme (48), Cd can directly inactivate hOGG1 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase activity in vitro (Fig. 2). It has been proposed elsewhere (48) that this direct effect of Cd on the OGG1 activity is the result of its capacity to replace the Ca atom identified in the crystal structure of the protein (6). However, also as described for the mouse model, this direct inhibition appears irreversible, suggesting that in cadmium-treated cells the mechanism underlying the reversible inhibition of hOGG1 is mainly indirect. With the balance of glutathione and GSSG providing a dynamic indicator of oxidative stress (30, 35, 39), our data confirmed that cadmium compromises the cellular redox state, inducing a temporary shift towards a strongly oxidizing environment. The alteration of the glutathione balance characterized by an increase in the oxidized form, GSSG, when the heavy metal accumulated in cells was paralleled by an inhibition of the cellular DNA glycosylase activity. Therefore, the dramatic change induced by Cd in the redox status of the cell could produce reversible oxidative modifications of critical residues in the OGG1 protein. Disruption of the intracellular homeostasis by cadmium-induced oxidative stress leading to protein thiolation (16) and alteration of thiol transferases has been reported previously (9, 23). The human OGG1 protein, possessing eight cysteine residues, with two of them, C253 and C255, in the active site (4, 6), is a good candidate for regulation through oxidative modifications. Another characteristic of these particular cysteines is that they are surrounded by positively charged amino acids, making them more susceptible to oxidation by the stabilization of the thiolate anion (Cys-S) (31). Also arguing for this hypothesis, the activity of OGG1 immunoprecipitated from a human cell line overexpressing hOGG1 was found to be inhibited by nitric oxide treatment of the cells (29). Using nonreducing Western blot assays, we have established that the modifications of cellular 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase activity in cadmium-treated cells clearly coincided with changes in the redox state of the OGG1 protein. Similar results showing a redox-induced modification and regulation of hOGG1 after Cd treatment, albeit with different kinetics probably due to the different permeability of cell membranes to Cd, were obtained with two human epithelial cell lines (data not shown). Although we cannot rule out the possibility that other posttranslational modifications induced by Cd treatment of the cells could have minor effects on the activity of hOGG1, our results support the hypothesis that cadmium-induced alterations of the cellular hOGG1 activity resulted mainly from an indirect effect mediated through changes in the oxidizing environment that in turn lead to reversible modifications of the redox state of the hOGG1 protein. Cysteine residues can be modified reversibly in different ways that can affect the activities of proteins. Such modifications include S-nitrosylation, S-glutathionylation, and formation of sulfenic acids and intra- or intermolecular disulfides. They are thought to protect proteins from further irreversible oxidation to sulfonic acid. Once the redox cellular environment is normalized, these oxidized forms can revert to yield a nonmodified protein. In many cases the reversion reaction is carried out by specific redox regulatory proteins such as thioredoxin, glutaredoxin, sulfidoredoxin, or APE1/ref-1 (3, 18, 21). Examples of redox-regulated proteins include a number of transcription factors binding to DNA such as AP-1 (26), p53 (40), and NF-
B (20). Confirming that hOGG1 activity can be regulated by redox modification of the protein, we showed here that hOGG1 activity can be inhibited using the cysteine-modifying agent NEM or the thiol oxidant diamide, indicating that modification of sulfhydryl moieties within the hOGG1 protein can impair its activity. Furthermore, diamide-induced inhibition of purified OGG1 is reversible by using a reducing agent.
It is tempting to speculate that the redox state of hOGG1 can be modulated by a reductive protein partner in human cells allowing recovery of a functional enzyme after its inactivation by an oxidative burst. As mentioned above, there are at the moment a few proteins, TRx, GRx, SRx, and APE1/ref-1, whose roles in controlling protein thiol oxidation have been demonstrated. Among them, APE1/ref-1 appears as an interesting candidate for a modulator of the hOGG1 activity: it is a bifunctional protein which is involved in activation of several transcription factors through its redox domain (7, 21, 24, 40, 46) and also the second enzyme of the base excision repair pathway through its endonuclease domain cleaving the abasic sites resulting from DNA glycosylase activity (13, 28, 42). Further work is obviously required for sustain this hypothesis.
In summary, we have shown that an acute exposure of human cells to cadmium leads to the reversible inactivation of hOGG1 activity through an indirect mechanism resulting from the cadmium-induced oxidative stress. Our results indicate that hOGG1 must possess critical redox-sensitive residues whose reduced state is important for the 8-oxoG DNA glycosylase activity. This finding confirms the central importance of oxidative stress in cadmium effect, and particular in its carcinogenic potential, leading to oxidative DNA damages but also to inhibition of a critical enzyme involved in the repair of oxidized bases. More largely, the fact that hOGG1 activity is sensitive to alterations in the cellular redox equilibrium opens interesting questions about its behavior during oxidative stresses known to occur in numerous physiological or pathological situations such as inflammation, cancer, or neurodegenerative diseases.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by the CEA, the CNRS, and grants from the Programme de Toxicologie Nucléaire et Environmentale and the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC 3836).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 21 August 2006. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Audebert, M., J. B. Charbonnier, S. Boiteux, and J. P. Radicella. 2002. Mitochondrial targeting of human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase hOGG1 is impaired by a somatic mutation found in kidney cancer. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 1:497-505.[CrossRef]
3. Biswas, S., A. S. Chida, and I. Rahman. 2006. Redox modifications of protein-thiols: emerging roles in cell signaling. Biochem. Pharmacol. 71:551-564.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Bjoras, M., L. Luna, B. Johnsen, E. Hoff, T. Haug, T. Rognes, and E. Seeberg. 1997. Opposite base-dependent reactions of a human base excision repair enzyme on DNA containing 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine and abasic sites. EMBO J. 16:6314-6322.[CrossRef][Medline]
5. Boiteux, S., and J. P. Radicella. 2000. The human OGG1 gene: structure, functions, and its implication in the process of carcinogenesis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 377:1-8.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Bruner, S. D., D. P. G. Norman, and G. L. Verdine. 2000. Structural basis for recognition and repair of the endogenous mutagen 8-oxoguanine in DNA. Nature 403:859-866.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Cao, X., F. Kambe, X. Lu, N. Kobayashi, S. Ohmori, and H. Seo. 2005. Glutathionylation of two cysteine residues in paired domain regulates DNA binding activity of Pax-8. J. Biol. Chem. 280:25901-25906.
8. Chao, J. I., and J. L. Yang. 2001. Alteration of cadmium-induced mutational spectrum by catalase depletion in Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells. Mutat. Res. 498:7-18.[Medline]
9. Chrestensen, C. A., D. W. Starke, and J. J. Mieyal. 2000. Acute cadmium exposure inactivates thioltransferase (glutaredoxin), inhibits intracellular reduction of protein-glutathionyl-mixed disulfides, and initiates apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 275:26556-26565.
10. Coutant, A., N. Bidon-Wagner, C. Levalois, B. Lectard, J. Lebeau, and S. Chevillard. Biochimie, in press.
11. Dally, H., and A. Hartwig. 1997. Induction and repair inhibition of oxidative DNA damage by nickel(II) and cadmium(II) in mammalian cells. Carcinogenesis 18:1021-1026.
12. Davies, K. J. 1987. Protein damage and degradation by oxygen radicals. I. General aspects. J. Biol. Chem. 262:9895-9901.
13. Demple, B., and L. Harrison. 1994. Repair of oxidative damage to DNA: enzymology and biology. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63:915-948.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. de Zwart, L. L., J. H. Meerman, J. N. Commandeur, and N. P. Vermeulen. 1999. Biomarkers of free radical damage applications in experimental animals and in humans. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 26:202-226.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Ercal, N., H. Gurer-Orhan, and N. Aykin-Burns. 2001. Toxic metals and oxidative stress part I: mechanisms involved in metal-induced oxidative damage. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 1:529-539.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Figueiredo-Pereira, M. E., S. Yakushin, and G. Cohen. 1998. Disruption of the intracellular sulfhydryl homeostasis by cadmium-induced oxidative stress leads to protein thiolation and ubiquitination in neuronal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273:12703-12709.
17. Filipic, M., and T. K. Hei. 2004. Mutagenicity of cadmium in mammalian cells: implication of oxidative DNA damage. Mutat. Res. 546:81-91.[Medline]
18. Findlay, V. J., H. Tapiero, and D. M. Townsend. 2005. Sulfiredoxin: a potential therapeutic agent? Biomed. Pharmacother. 59:374-379.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Fotakis, G., E. Cemeli, D. Anderson, and J. A. Timbrell. 2005. Cadmium chloride-induced DNA and lysosomal damage in a hepatoma cell line. Toxicol. In Vitro 19:481-489.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Freemerman, A. J., A. Gallegos, and G. Powis. 1999. Nuclear factor
B transactivation is increased but is not involved in the proliferative effects of thioredoxin overexpression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 59:4090-4094.
21. Fritz, G., S. Grosch, M. Tomicic, and B. Kaina. 2003. APE/Ref-1 and the mammalian response to genotoxic stress. Toxicology 193:67-78.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Grollman, A. P., and M. Moriya. 1993. Mutagenesis by 8-oxoguanine: an enemy within. Trends Genet. 9:246-249.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Hansen, J. M., H. Zhang, and D. P. Jones. 2006. Differential oxidation of thioredoxin-1, thioredoxin-2, and glutathione by metal ions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 40:138-145.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Hanson, S., E. Kim, and W. Deppert. 2005. Redox factor 1 (Ref-1) enhances specific DNA binding of p53 by promoting p53 tetramerization. Oncogene 24:1641-1647.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Hartwig, A., M. Asmuss, H. Blessing, S. Hoffmann, G. Jahnke, S. Khandelwal, A. Pelzer, and A. Burkle. 2002. Interference by toxic metal ions with zinc-dependent proteins involved in maintaining genomic stability. Food Chem. Toxicol. 40:1179-1184.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Hirota, K., M. Matsui, S. Iwata, A. Nishiyama, K. Mori, and J. Yodoi. 1997. AP-1 transcriptional activity is regulated by a direct association between thioredoxin and Ref-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:3633-3638.
27. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1993. Cadmium and cadmium components. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum. 58:119-237.[Medline]
28. Izumi, T., T. K. Hazra, I. Boldogh, A. E. Tomkinson, M. S. Park, S. Ikeda, and S. Mitra. 2000. Requirement for human AP endonuclease 1 for repair of 3'-blocking damage at DNA single-strand breaks induced by reactive oxygen species. Carcinogenesis 21:1329-1334.
29. Jaiswal, M., N. F. LaRusso, N. Nishioka, Y. Nakabeppu, and G. J. Gores. 2001. Human Ogg1, a protein involved in the repair of 8-oxoguanine, is inhibited by nitric oxide. Cancer Res. 61:6388-6393.
30. Jones, D. P. 2002. Redox potential of GSH/GSSG couple: assay and biological significance. Methods Enzymol. 348:93-112.[Medline]
31. Kim, J. R., H. W. Yoon, K. S. Kwon, S. R. Lee, and S. G. Rhee. 2000. Identification of proteins containing cysteine residues that are sensitive to oxidation by hydrogen peroxide at neutral pH. Anal. Biochem. 283:214-221.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Lloyd, D. R., P. L. Carmichael, and D. H. Phillips. 1998. Comparison of the formation of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine and single- and double-strand breaks in DNA mediated by Fenton reactions. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 11:420-427.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Marnett, L. J. 2000. Oxyradicals and DNA damage. Carcinogenesis 21:361-370.
34. Michaels, M. L., and J. H. Miller. 1992. The GO system protects organisms from the mutagenic effect of the spontaneous lesion 8-hydroxyguanine (7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine). J. Bacteriol. 174:6321-6325.
35. Pias, E. K., and T. Y. Aw. 2002. Apoptosis in mitotic competent undifferentiated cells is induced by cellular redox imbalance independent of reactive oxygen species production. FASEB J. 16:781-790.
36. Potts, R. J., I. A. Bespalov, S. S. Wallace, R. J. Melamede, and B. A. Hart. 2001. Inhibition of oxidative DNA repair in cadmium-adapted alveolar epithelial cells and the potential involvement of metallothionein. Toxicology 161:25-38.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Potts, R. J., R. D. Watkin, and B. A. Hart. 2003. Cadmium exposure down-regulates 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase expression in rat lung and alveolar epithelial cells. Toxicology 184:189-202.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Pourahmad, J., P. J. O'Brien, F. Jokar, and B. Daraei. 2003. Carcinogenic metal induced sites of reactive oxygen species formation in hepatocytes. Toxicol. In Vitro 17:803-810.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Schafer, F. Q., and G. R. Buettner. 2001. Redox environment of the cell as viewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione couple. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 30:1191-1212.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Seemann, S., and P. Hainaut. 2005. Roles of thioredoxin reductase 1 and APE/Ref-1 in the control of basal p53 stability and activity. Oncogene 24:3853-3863.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Stohs, S. J., D. Bagchi, E. Hassoun, and M. Bagchi. 2001. Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of chromium and cadmium ions. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 20:77-88.[Medline]
42. Vidal, A. E., I. D. Hickson, S. Boiteux, and J. P. Radicella. 2001. Mechanism of stimulation of the DNA glycosylase activity of hOGG1 by the major human AP endonuclease: bypass of the AP lyase activity step. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:1285-1292.
43. Vido, K., D. Spector, G. Lagniel, S. Lopez, M. B. Toledano, and J. Labarre. 2001. A proteome analysis of the cadmium response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 276:8469-8474.
44. Waisberg, M., P. Joseph, B. Hale, and D. Beyersmann. 2003. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of cadmium carcinogenesis. Toxicology 192:95-117.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Watjen, W., and D. Beyersmann. 2004. Cadmium-induced apoptosis in C6 glioma cells: influence of oxidative stress. Biometals 17:65-78.[CrossRef][Medline]
46. Xanthoudakis, S., G. Miao, F. Wang, Y. C. Pan, and T. Curran. 1992. Redox activation of Fos-Jun DNA binding activity is mediated by a DNA repair enzyme. EMBO J. 11:3323-3335.[Medline]
47. Youn, C. K., S. H. Kim, Y. Lee do, S. H. Song, I. Y. Chang, J. W. Hyun, M. H. Chung, and H. J. You. 2005. Cadmium down-regulates human OGG1 through suppression of Sp1 activity. J. Biol. Chem. 280:25185-25195.
48. Zharkov, D. O., and T. A. Rosenquist. 2002. Inactivation of mammalian 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase by cadmium(II): implications for cadmium genotoxicity. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 1:661-670.[CrossRef]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | J. Virol. | Eukaryot. Cell |
|---|
| Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | All ASM Journals |
|---|