Mary M. Lozano, and
Jaquelin P. Dudley*
Section of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
Received 15 June 2006/ Accepted 20 July 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genetic studies of the Drosophila cut gene have revealed an important role in determining cell type specificity in several tissues (5, 6, 36), and similar conclusions have been obtained with mice and chickens (45, 46). Experiments using Cutl1 knockout mice showed organ-specific phenotypes, including curly whiskers, growth retardation, altered hair follicle morphogenesis, delayed differentiation of lung epithelia, male infertility, and excess production of myeloid cells (13, 28, 44). Further, mice expressing a Cutl1 variant missing CR1 (
CR1) had a defect in milk composition (46). In contrast, Cutl1 overexpression in transgenic mice caused multiorgan hyperplasia and organomegaly (22).
Cutl1/CDP is a transcriptional repressor of multiple cellular genes, including gp91-phox, c-myc, T-cell receptor ß chain, CD8, and immunoglobulin heavy chain (4, 12, 20, 24, 36, 49), as well as viral genes, including mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) and human papillomavirus (37, 53). Multiple studies indicate that CDP is expressed at high levels in undifferentiated cells, whereas CDP-mediated repression declines during differentiation (36). Kidney-specific Cutl1 expression is inversely related to the degree of cellular differentiation (48), and DNA-binding activity is down-regulated during myeloid and B-cell development (21, 49). In addition, we previously have shown that CDP negatively regulates transcription of multiple genes that are expressed in differentiated mammary glands (54). These results indicate that CDP is a transcriptional repressor of genes whose expression is highest during the end stages of differentiation. Furthermore, Cutl1/CDP appears to participate in cell migratory behavior and has been associated with breast cancer progression (31).
MMTV is a retrovirus that primarily induces mammary carcinomas, and the viral major promoter is a paradigm for mammary-specific and hormone-regulated expression (35). Multiple transcriptional controls suppress MMTV expression at early stages of mammary development (27, 52, 53). However, viral mRNA levels increase during differentiation, and the highest levels of transcription occur during lactation, a time when virus is transmitted from mothers to offspring in the milk (54). We previously have shown that CDP is a repressor of MMTV expression (52, 53). CDP binding to viral negative regulatory elements (NREs) in the MMTV long terminal repeats (LTRs) is maximal in virgin mammary gland, and this activity declines during mammary development (53). Interestingly, CDP itself is differentially regulated during mammary differentiation. Full-length CDP levels decline during mammary development, concurrent with the appearance of a novel 150-kDa protein and decreased binding to the MMTV NREs (53, 54). However, the mechanism of CDP-mediated MMTV regulation during mammary differentiation has not been demonstrated.
In the present study, we have investigated the mechanism of CDP regulation in the mammary gland. We have shown that the levels of full-length CDP decrease both in vivo and in cultured breast epithelial cells during differentiation, a period when MMTV transcription increases. Endogenous or exogenous full-length CDP protein (200 kDa) is proteolytically cleaved to generate a novel C-terminally truncated protein of 150 kDa with identical properties (here called CDP150), and this processing event is regulated during mammary differentiation. Interestingly, analysis of full-length CDP or deletion mutants indicated that both the HD and the C terminus are required for processing and that CDP150 acts as a dominant-negative protein on both the MMTV NREs and the ß-casein promoter. Further, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) confirmed that RNA levels of several mammary-specific genes increased after expression of a construct similar to CDP150. Together, these results revealed a novel mode of CDP-mediated regulation during mammary development.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmid constructions.
The plasmid pMTV-LUC (also called pLC-LUC or pC3H-LUC) contains the C3H MMTV LTR sequence upstream of firefly luciferase as described previously (43, 53). The full-length Cutl1/CDP cDNA clone used here originally was obtained from Ellis Neufeld (24) and begins at the first in-frame ATG at position 44 of exon 1b of the Cutl1 gene. The full-length CDP gene was cloned into pCMV-Tag2A at the EcoRI and EcoRV sites (FLAG-CDP). This N-terminally FLAG-tagged CDP vector was C-terminally hemagglutinin (HA) tagged by Patrick Hearing (14). The construct FLAG-
CR23HD, lacking the CR2, CR3, and HD, was prepared by partial BamHI digestion of FLAG-CDP. The 7,683-bp fragment was recovered from the gel, and the ends were ligated. The FLAG-
C plasmid, which lacks the C-terminal domain of CDP, was constructed by partial BamHI digestion of FLAG-CDP followed by blunting the ends and ligation, resulting in deletion of the C terminus at bp 3936. The HA tag sequence was added to the C-terminal end of FLAG-
C by PCR using the following primers: CDP HindIII+ (5' ATC CTC ACC CCC AAG CTT CTG TCC ACC 3') and CDP-
CHA- (5' CTA GCT AGC TCA CAG GCT GGC ATA GTC AGG CAC GTC ATA AGG ATA GCT GAT CCG AGA 3'). The PCR product was gel purified and cloned into the HindIII and NheI sites of the CDP expression vector. FLAG-
HD-HA, which has an internal deletion of the HD, was prepared by recombinant PCR using the following primer pairs: CDP HindIII+ and CDPin- (5' CTC AAT GAA CAG GGG CTG GCT GTC ACT GAC TGA 3'); CDPin+ (5' GAC AGC CAG CCC CTG TTC ATT GAG GAA ATT CAG 3') and CDPHANheI- (5' CTA GCT AGC TCA CAG GCT GGC AT 3'). The PCR products were digested with HindIII and NheI and cloned into the HindIII and NheI sites of the CDP vector. The FLAG-
HD15C vector was made by using the following primers: CDP HindIII+ and CDP-
HD15- (5' CTA GCT AGC TCA GCT TGT TTT CAG GTT 3'). The PCR product was gel purified using spin columns (QIAGEN) and digested with HindIII and NheI and cloned into the CDP expression vector digested with HindIII and NheI. All PCRs were performed using the Expand Long Template PCR system (Roche). The
LZHD15C mutant was constructed by recombinant PCR to delete the leucine zipper region (bp 1040 to 1277); the fragment was cloned into the EcoR1 and EcoRV sites of FLAG-CDP. The construct was then modified as described for FLAG-
HD15C. The ß-casein-LUC plasmid was constructed by PCR amplification of a region from bp 1 to 330 upstream of the ß-casein transcription start site. The following primers containing a HindIII restriction site were used: ß-casein1 (5' CCC AAG CTT GTC CTA TCA GAC TCT GTG ACC GTA 3') and ß-casein331 (5' CCC AAG CTT TTA AAG CCC CCC ACT AGG 3'). The PCR product was gel purified, digested with HindIII, and cloned into the HindIII site of p19LUC containing the firefly luciferase gene. The correct orientation of the insert was confirmed by sequencing.
Transient transfections and luciferase assays. SCp2 cells were transfected with DMRIE-C reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Transfections were performed with either full-length or CDP deletion mutant constructs followed by incubation of cells with or without differentiation medium and ECM. After 4 days of differentiation, the transfected cells were resuspended in Matrisperse cell recovery solution and then used for preparation of nuclear extracts. For luciferase assays, 5 x 105 SCp2 cells were seeded in a six-well plate in 2 ml of DMEM/F-12 growth medium. For each transfection, pMTV-LUC and different amounts of full-length and truncated CDP expression vectors were added to 1 ml of DMEM/F-12 without serum containing 12 µl of DMRIE-C reagent and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The cells were washed with DMEM/F-12 without serum, and the DNA solution was incubated with the cells for 6 h at 37°C. Subsequently, 1 ml of complete medium containing twice the normal concentration of serum was added without removing the DNA-containing medium, and the cells were incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator for 48 h. The cells were assayed for luciferase activity using the Dual Luciferase detection kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transfections were expressed as relative values per 100 µg protein.
Preparation of nuclear extracts and Western analysis. Nuclear extracts for EMSAs were prepared essentially as described by Liu et al. (27). Mammary tissue extracts were prepared from normal BALB/cJ mice (Jackson Labs) or Sprague-Dawley rats as described previously (54). Nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts from transfected SCp2 cells for Western analysis were prepared using the NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents kit (Pierce Biotechnology). Whole-cell lysates were prepared in RIPA buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.8], 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate), and the protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent. Protein extracts were subjected to electrophoresis on 6% polyacrylamide gels prior to Western blotting, as described elsewhere (54). Binding of the secondary antibody was detected using the Western blotting Lightning ECL detection system (Perkin-Elmer). The N-terminal CDP-specific antibody was kindly provided by Alain Nepveu (McGill University, Montreal, Canada). The FLAG and HA antibodies were obtained from Stratagene and Roche, respectively. The C-20 polyclonal antibody specific for the C-terminal 20 amino acids of Cutl1/CDP was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Antibodies specific for the C-terminal region of CDP (CR2-Cterm) have been described previously (27).
EMSAs and antibody ablation assays. EMSAs were performed as described by Liu et al. (26, 27) using the pNRE4 probe (27). Conditions for Sp1 binding have been described elsewhere (53). The 145-bp ß-casein probe spanning the CDP-binding sites predicted by the TRANSFAC software was obtained by PCR using the following primers: ß-casein 4606 (5' CCG GAA TTC TTG GCT GGA GGA ACA TGT AGT TGT T 3') and ß-casein 4750 (5' CCC AAG CTT TTA GAA AAT GGT TTC TTT CTA TT 3'). The introduced HindIII and EcoRI sites are shown in bold. The PCR product was gel purified, digested with EcoRI and HindIII, and cloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). Purified plasmid DNA from pNRE4 was digested with EcoRI and HindIII (pNRE4) to give 5' overhanging ends, and the inserts were isolated on polyacrylamide gels. Fragments were end labeled with Sequenase (version 2.0; USB Corp.), and 2.5 fmol was incubated with nuclear extracts and analyzed on 4% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels as previously described (54). One µl (1:10 dilution) of rabbit anti-CDP (CR2-Cterm), mouse anti-FLAG or preimmune serum was used for antibody ablation experiments as described previously (27).
RT-PCRs. RNA extraction methods, conditions for RT-PCRs, and some primer sequences have been described previously (54). Primer pairs used to test the expression of different DNA-binding domains of CDP were as follows: CR1 (5' TGC CAT CCG CTC CAT CCT ACA 3' and 5' GCT GGA ACT CAT TGG GGA CT 3'); CR2/CR3 (5' AGC AGT ACG AGG TCT ACA TG 3' and 5' GCC CAG CTC TCC ATT CAG 3'); CR3/HD (5' TGC CTC TCT CTG GAC ACT CA 3' and 5' GAG TCG CTG GCA CCA GCC TG 3').
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To examine the DNA-binding activities of CDP and CDP150, nuclear extracts were prepared from differentiated and undifferentiated SCp2 cells and analyzed by EMSA using a promoter-proximal NRE (pNRE) probe. CDP-binding activity to the pNRE within the MMTV LTR was detected in untreated SCp2 cells or cells treated with hormones alone (Fig. 1F, lanes 2 and 3); binding was abolished by CDP-specific, but not preimmune, sera (compare lanes 6 and 9). This activity disappeared following differentiation in the presence of ECM, concurrent with the loss of full-length CDP (Fig. 1F, lane 4). Incubation of the same extracts with Sp1 probe confirmed the integrity of the SCp2 nuclear extracts (data not shown), in agreement with previous data using tissue extracts (53). These results support our previously published data obtained with mammary tissues from different developmental stages (53) and validated this in vitro system for studying CDP regulation during mammary differentiation.
Loss of endogenous full-length CDP during mammary differentiation relieves MMTV transcriptional repression. Previous studies have shown that CDP overexpression suppresses MMTV LTR-reporter activity in cultured cells (52, 53), and mutations within the LTR that inhibit CDP binding also increase MMTV transcription (52, 54). Thus, loss of full-length CDP during differentiation of SCp2 cells should elevate MMTV transcription. To verify this, the effect of cellular differentiation on MMTV-LTR-driven luciferase reporter gene expression (Fig. 2A) was determined in transient-transfection assays.
|
CDP is processed at the C terminus by a cysteine protease during mammary differentiation. Full-length CDP is expressed in most undifferentiated tissues, although multiple isoforms of this protein also have been described (18, 25, 32). Proteolytic processing of CDP to a 110-kDa form during the G1/S transition plays an important role in the regulation of cell cycle progression (32). To study the mechanism of CDP down-regulation during mammary development, several possibilities were evaluated. First, an extensive cocktail of protease inhibitors was used during cell lysis to prevent proteolytic degradation during extract preparation. Mixing of nuclear extracts derived from virgin and lactating mammary tissues before or after homogenization revealed the presence of both full-length CDP and CDP150, suggesting that CDP was not being degraded during lysis and that both forms were in the nucleus (see below). Second, we examined whether CDP regulation occurred at the posttranscriptional level. No alterations in known CDP mRNA species were detected during mammary development using RT-PCR with RNAs extracted from virgin, pregnant, and lactating mammary glands and primers spanning the different DNA-binding domains (data not shown). Third, we determined whether CDP150 is generated by proteolytic cleavage of the full-length protein.
To evaluate this model, SCp2 cells were transfected with a vector encoding the full-length CDP cDNA carrying N-terminal FLAG and C-terminal HA tags (Fig. 3A). Transfected cells were plated with or without ECM in the presence of lactogenic hormones to determine whether one of the terminal tags would be lost during differentiation. After 4 days, cells were harvested and analyzed by Western blotting using FLAG- or HA-specific antibody. Cells harvested 24 h posttransfection were used to ensure that full-length CDP could be detected (Fig. 3B, lane 2). FLAG-specific antibody confirmed the presence of the N terminus in both CDP and CDP150 (Fig. 3B, lane 4). However, the HA-specific antibody detected full-length CDP, but not the 150-kDa form, in differentiated cells, consistent with CDP processing at the C terminus to form CDP150 (Fig. 3B, lane 8).
|
CDP processing in mammary cells requires both the HD and the C terminus. To map the sequences required for processing, a series of CDP expression vectors expressing tagged versions of the protein were generated (Fig. 4A). Expression of mutant proteins and their localization to the nucleus was confirmed (Fig. 4B and C). Since mutants lacking the N-terminal, middle, or C-terminal region each were detected in the nucleus, these results suggested that full-length CDP has at least two nuclear localization signals. Subsequently, each of the N-terminally FLAG-tagged CDP mutants was transfected into SCp2 cells, and the appearance of the truncated CDP forms was analyzed after differentiation by Western blotting using FLAG- or HA-specific antibody.
|
C-HA). This deletion construct produced a protein which was tagged on both termini and whose size was similar to the CDP150 form observed during differentiation. If this C-terminal deletion mutant mimics CDP150, then protein processing should not occur after treatment of cells with hormones and ECM. SCp2 cells were transiently transfected with the FLAG-
C-HA mutant prior to treatment with lactogenic hormones in the presence or absence of ECM to induce differentiation. As expected, Western analysis using extracts from transfected cells revealed that no processed CDP forms were generated upon differentiation (Fig. 5A, lane 2).
|
C-HA prior to nuclear extract preparation and EMSAs. Interestingly, the
C mutant protein retained its DNA-binding ability to the MMTV LTR probe in undifferentiated cells, indicating that this CDP form is different from CDP150 (Fig. 5B, lane 2). Furthermore, DNA-binding activities of both the endogenous CDP and
C proteins were detectable and confirmed by ablation with specific antibodies (Fig. 5B, lanes 3 and 4). These results suggest that the C-terminal domain is dispensable for CDP repressor function on the MMTV LTR.
One possible model for CDP150 generation is that full-length protein is cleaved within the HD but requires the C-terminal domain for processing. To test this possibility, two additional mutants, one lacking the HD but retaining the C-terminal domain of CDP (FLAG-
HD-HA) and the other lacking CR2, CR3, and HD (FLAG-
CR23HD), were tested (Fig. 4A). Transfection experiments followed by Western blot analysis revealed that neither protein was processed (Fig. 5C). In contrast, the mutant lacking the N terminus, the leucine zipper, and CR1 (FLAG-
NLZCR1) was processed after differentiation to give a protein of 50 kDa lower in mass, and this protein retained the N-terminal tag (Fig. 5C). These results suggested that CDP150 is generated by truncation within the HD, a domain which is missing in both
HD and
CR23HD. Moreover, the N-terminal region of CDP is dispensable for processing, whereas the C-terminal domain is not.
CDP150 acts as a dominant-negative regulator of CDP to elevate MMTV expression.
Our previous data indicated that CDP150 was localized to the nucleus of differentiated mammary cells but lacked DNA-binding activity for the MMTV NREs (53). Therefore, we determined the CDP domains required for binding to the MMTV NREs. The homeodomains of many proteins are highly conserved domains that participate in sequence-specific DNA binding (11) through an
-helix near the HD C terminus known as the "recognition helix" (19). Therefore, we constructed an additional mutant with a deletion of the CDP C-terminal domain and 15 amino acids from the HD that removed the "recognition helix" (FLAG-
HD15C). Wild-type and mutant expression vectors then were used for transfections of undifferentiated SCp2 cells and nuclear extract preparation.
Both CDP and FLAG-
C-HA deletion mutants exhibited DNA-binding activity by EMSAs (Fig. 5B). However, the mutants lacking either the HD (
HD) or the C-terminal domain together with 15 amino acids from the C-terminal end of HD (
HD15C) failed to bind to the MMTV LTR probe (Fig. 6A, lanes 9 and 13). All proteins were expressed in equivalent amounts (Fig. 6B). These results indicate that the HD is required for CDP binding to the viral NREs. Furthermore, transfection of cells with either
HD or
HD15C, but not
C, expression vectors eliminated binding of endogenous CDP to the MMTV LTR (Fig. 5B and 6A), suggesting that CDP isoforms lacking the HD act in a dominant-negative manner to block wild-type CDP binding to DNA.
|
HD15C in EMSAs, we performed mixing experiments with nuclear extracts derived from virgin and lactating mammary glands of BALB/c mice. As described previously (53, 54), virgin gland extracts showed considerable binding to the MMTV NREs, which was abolished by CDP-specific antibody, whereas lactating extracts had little or no binding activity (Fig. 6C, lanes 4 and 2, respectively). Mixing of the two extracts to give an approximate 1:1 molar ratio of the two proteins as determined by Western blotting (Fig. 6D, lane 3) eliminated binding to the MMTV NREs (Fig. 6C, lane 3). Similar results were obtained with differentiated SCp2 extracts that contained equal amounts of full-length CDP and CDP150 (Fig. 6C and D). Thus, by size and DNA-binding characteristics, CDP150 and
HD15C are indistinguishable.
Dominant-negative proteins should affect the repressor function of CDP on the MMTV NREs. Therefore, MMTV LTR-reporter gene activity was analyzed in cotransfection assays of SCp2 cells (Fig. 6E). As anticipated, the
C construct behaved like wild-type CDP in suppressing expression from the viral LTR, indicating that the C-terminal region, which contains the active repression domains (29), is not required for regulating MMTV transcription. In contrast, the CDP deletion mutants lacking the HD (
HD and
HD15C) failed to repress MMTV LTR activity in transient assays. Interestingly, both of these mutants activated MMTV transcription compared to cells transfected with empty vector.
To further test the idea that CDP150 acts as a dominant-negative protein, the
HD15C expression plasmid was modified by deletion of the leucine zipper (
LZHD15C). Cotransfection of the pMTV-LUC reporter plasmid with
LZHD15C eliminated the ability of
HD15C to induce expression from the MMTV LTR (Fig. 6F). These results are consistent with results from DNA-binding assays indicating that CDP isoforms lacking all or part of the HD act as dominant-negative proteins that interfere with CDP repressor function.
CDP150 regulates ß-casein and other mammary-specific genes. We previously have shown that Cutl1/CDP knockout mice have increased expression of MMTV and several mammary-specific genes (54). To determine whether the dominant-negative activity of CDP150 was restricted to the MMTV LTR, we tested the binding ability of mutant CDP proteins to the ß-casein promoter. Similar to results observed with the MMTV NRE probe, EMSAs using extracts derived from transfected SCp2 cells revealed that full-length CDP could bind to the ß-casein probe, whereas constructs lacking all or part of the HD could not (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, CDP constructs without the HD interfered with endogenous CDP binding. Western blotting of the nuclear extracts confirmed the expression of the transfected proteins (Fig. 7B).
|
C protein (Fig. 7C). However, constructs carrying a deletion of all or part of the HD increased luciferase activity from two- to threefold. To confirm and extend these findings, we assayed the endogenous levels of several mammary-specific genes by semiquantitative RT-PCR after expression of either
HD or
HD15C in SCp2 cells. Similar to expression assays with reporter vectors, CDP constructs lacking a functional HD elevated endogenous MMTV and ß-casein expression two- to threefold (Fig. 7D). Increased amounts of whey acidic protein (WAP) and
-lactalbumin mRNAs also were observed in the presence of
HD or
HD15C proteins. However, in agreement with our studies of Cutl1 knockout mice (54), there was no significant effect on
-casein or WDNM1 in mammary cells. Together, our results suggest that CDP150 is a novel, differentiation-induced, dominant-negative protein that appears during mammary gland development to increase the expression of multiple mammary-specific genes. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The CDP isoforms found in differentiated mammary cells in culture and in vivo appear to be identical. The CDP150 forms found in lactating mammary glands and differentiated SCp2 cells share similar size, reactivity with antibodies, and failure to bind to the MMTV NREs. Further, the appearance of CDP150 correlates in vivo and in culture with increased MMTV expression (53) (Fig. 2). Characterization of CDP150 has been very difficult because no method exists to identify the C terminus of every protein. Even in cases where the method works, much greater protein quantities are required compared to that needed for N-terminal sequencing. Moreover, mass spectrometry analysis does not detect all peptides, and clear identification of a truncated C-terminal peptide is not possible (8; R. Kobayashi, personal communication). However, the
HD15C mutant mimics the biochemical, serological, and functional characteristics observed for the CDP150 isoform.
CDP150 appears to act as a dominant-negative protein. Mixing of extracts from differentiated and undifferentiated cells obtained either in vivo or from cell cultures leads to loss of DNA binding to the MMTV NREs (Fig. 6). We have demonstrated that loss of all or part of the CDP HD abrogated binding to the MMTV LTR and the ß-casein promoters in spite of retaining three other DNA-binding domains (Fig. 6 and 7). The CDP HD is a highly conserved domain that has been shown to be essential for DNA binding in other homeoproteins (11). An important characteristic of the HD is the presence of the C-terminal helix-turn-helix motif, which mediates DNA binding (19). Since CDP150 lacks binding activity for the MMTV and ß-casein promoters, removal of the HD C terminus likely interferes with sequences essential for DNA binding. Moreover, the CDP mutants
HD and
HD15C failed to bind to the MMTV NREs or the ß-casein promoter or to repress reporter gene expression in transient assays (Fig. 6 and 7). These mutant CDPs were able to stimulate expression from reporter gene constructs, suggesting that they act as dominant-negative proteins by dimer formation with full-length CDP. Although CDP150 might act as a positive regulator to activate MMTV expression during differentiation, we have been unable to detect binding of either
HD or
HD15C to the MMTV LTR (data not shown). Furthermore, removal of the leucine zipper from the
HD15C protein eliminates its ability to interfere with the function of full-length CDP, consistent with a dominant-negative activity on the MMTV promoter (Fig. 6F).
Multiple isoforms of Cutl1/CDP have been characterized (18, 25, 32). The p110 isoform is proteolytically processed to remove the N terminus by a nuclear form of cathepsin L at the G1/S transition of the cell cycle (17). This form, which contains CR2, CR3, and HD, has been reported to stably interact with DNA and to be overexpressed in uterine leiomyomas (33). A shorter isoform of 75 kDa contains only two DNA-binding domains, CR3 and HD, and is generated by transcription initiation in intron 20 (18). The p75 protein is expressed in CD4+ CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and in many breast tumor cells, but not normal mammary tissue (18). Another isoform, Cut-alternatively spliced product (CASP), has the N-terminal leucine zipper, but no DNA-binding domains, and has been proposed to act as a dominant-negative protein (25). However, more recent evidence indicates that CASP is a cytoplasmic Golgi protein of 80 kDa with a unique C terminus and similarities to golgin 84 and giantin (16). Thus, all previously described nuclear CDP isoforms lack various portions of the N terminus. The CDP150 isoform is novel because it only appears after mammary differentiation, has a nuclear location, lacks DNA-binding activity for the MMTV and ß-casein promoters, has a different mass than other described isoforms, lacks the C terminus, and acts as a dominant-negative protein.
Several models were evaluated to explain the appearance of CDP150 during mammary epithelial cell differentiation. Assays for alternative splicing by RT-PCR indicated that there was no detectable difference between CDP RNA transcripts found in virgin and lactating mammary gland (data not shown). Studies of C/EBPß in mammary cells have revealed control of translational initiation to give isoforms with dominant-negative activity (3). However, these forms are missing the N-terminal portions of the C/EBP full-length proteins, in contrast to CDP150, which lacks the C terminus (Fig. 1). Further support for C-terminal processing was provided by transfection of tagged forms of full-length and various CDP mutants in SCp2 cells, consistent with C-terminal processing within the HD to generate the truncated form (Fig. 3 and 4). Since all of the tagged proteins were produced by transfections of cDNA expression vectors and because the cysteine protease inhibitor E64d, but not other inhibitors, interfere with production of endogenous CDP150, our data support CDP150 production by proteolytic processing, which appears to be induced specifically in the presence of extracellular matrix (Fig. 1D). Loss of the HD prevented CDP processing during mammary cell differentiation, indicating that the cleavage site is within the HD (Fig. 5). Nevertheless, mutants lacking only the C-terminal domain revealed that this region is essential for correct processing (Fig. 5). CDP also undergoes posttranslational modification at the C terminus (unpublished data). However, the nature of the responsible protease, whether there is protease activation during differentiation, and whether CDP is modified as a prerequisite for cleavage during mammary development have yet to be determined.
Addition of the E64d protease inhibitor blocked the appearance of CDP150 in the presence of differentiation conditions as determined by Western blotting, but not the overall level of ß-casein protein (Fig. 3C). In differentiated mammary cells, transcriptional activators may overcome the repressor effects of full-length CDP on MMTV and other mammary-specific genes, including ß-casein. Our data suggest that CDP cleavage is essential for developmentally specific induction of ß-casein mRNA, which occurs during late pregnancy (39). However, the presence of lactogenic hormones and positive factors are required for maximal ß-casein production during lactation. Overexpression of the dominant-negative protein CDP150 in the absence of differentiation conditions (39, 40) (Fig. 7C and D) will lower the amount of functional CDP, leading to an increase in MMTV and ß-casein RNA. Thus, our data support a model where CDP cleavage begins during late pregnancy (Fig. 1B), but large-scale production of MMTV and ß-casein proteins requires positive regulators that are expressed during lactation in highly differentiated cells.
Proteolytic processing is an important form of regulation in a number of cellular processes. For example, processing of C-terminal I
B sequences from NF-
B p105 contributes to nuclear translocation of the p50 isoform (34). However, CDP processing during mammary differentiation did not relocalize CDP150 to the cytoplasm. In some cases, specific proteolytic cleavage serves to generate novel isoforms with altered biochemical activities. Cleavage of full-length C/EBPß in the liver also has been proposed to give a dominant-negative isoform that binds to DNA but lacks transactivation potential (50). Previous studies have shown that CDP DNA-binding activity is inhibited by different posttranslational modifications, i.e., phosphorylation and acetylation, during differentiation of several cell types (9, 23). We have demonstrated that CDP DNA-binding activity for the MMTV and ß-casein promoters is regulated during mammary differentiation due to proteolytic processing of full-length CDP.
MMTV has long served as a model for mammary-specific gene regulation (7). Our experiments indicate that CDP is differentially expressed in the mammary gland to regulate MMTV and several cellular genes, e.g., ß-casein, WAP, and
-lactalbumin, which are expressed at their highest levels during lactation (Fig. 7). The generation of a dominant-negative CDP by intranuclear cleavage represents a novel form of regulation for multiple genes in the developing mammary gland.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants R01CA34780 and DAMD17-01-1-0424 from the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address: Center for Developmental Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6000 Harry Hines Blvd., NB 5.118, Dallas, TX 75390-9133. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Aufiero, B., E. J. Neufeld, and S. H. Orkin. 1994. Sequence-specific DNA binding of individual cut repeats of the human CCAAT displacement/cut homeodomain protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:7757-7761.
3. Baldwin, B. R., N. A. Timchenko, and C. A. Zahnow. 2004. Epidermal growth factor receptor stimulation activates the RNA binding protein CUG-BP1 and increases expression of C/EBPß-LIP in mammary epithelial cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:3682-3691.
4. Banan, M., I. C. Rojas, W. H. Lee, H. L. King, J. V. Harriss, R. Kobayashi, C. F. Webb, and P. D. Gottlieb. 1997. Interaction of the nuclear matrix-associated region (MAR)-binding proteins, SATB1 and CDP/Cux, with a MAR element (L2a) in an upstream regulatory region of the mouse CD8
gene. J. Biol. Chem. 272:18440-18452.
5. Blochlinger, K., R. Bodmer, J. Jack, L. Y. Jan, and Y. N. Jan. 1988. Primary structure and expression of a product from cut, a locus involved in specifying sensory organ identity in Drosophila. Nature 333:629-635.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Blochlinger, K., L. Y. Jan, and Y. N. Jan. 1991. Transformation of sensory organ identity by ectopic expression of Cut in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 5:1124-1135.
7. Cardiff, R. D., and W. J. Muller. 1993. Transgenic mouse models of mammary tumorigenesis. Cancer Surveys 16:97-113.[Medline]
8. Casagranda, F., and J. F. Wilshire. 1994. C-terminal sequencing of peptides. The thiocyanate degradation method. Methods Mol. Biol. 32:335-349.[Medline]
9. Coqueret, O., N. Martin, G. Berube, M. Rabbat, D. W. Litchfield, and A. Nepveu. 1998. DNA binding by cut homeodomain proteins is down-modulated by casein kinase II. J. Biol. Chem. 273:2561-2566.
10. Desprez, P. Y., E. Hara, M. J. Bissell, and J. Campisi. 1995. Suppression of mammary epithelial cell differentiation by the helix-loop-helix protein Id-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3398-3404.[Abstract]
11. Dragan, A. I., Z. Li, E. N. Makeyeva, E. I. Milgotina, Y. Liu, C. Crane-Robinson, and P. L. Privalov. 2006. Forces driving the binding of homeodomains to DNA. Biochemistry 45:141-151.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Dufort, D., and A. Nepveu. 1994. The human cut homeodomain protein represses transcription from the c-myc promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:4251-4257.
13. Ellis, T., L. Gambardella, M. Horcher, S. Tschanz, J. Capol, P. Bertram, W. Jochum, Y. Barrandon, and M. Busslinger. 2001. The transcriptional repressor CDP (Cutl1) is essential for epithelial cell differentiation of the lung and the hair follicle. Genes Dev. 15:2307-2319.
14. Erturk, E., P. Ostapchuk, S. I. Wells, J. Yang, K. Gregg, A. Nepveu, J. P. Dudley, and P. Hearing. 2003. Binding of CCAAT displacement protein CDP to adenovirus packaging sequences. J. Virol. 77:6255-6264.
15. Giangrande, A., and J. Palka. 1990. Genes involved in the development of the peripheral nervous system of Drosophila. Semin. Cell Biol. 1:197-209.[Medline]
16. Gillingham, A. K., A. C. Pfeifer, and S. Munro. 2002. CASP, the alternatively spliced product of the gene encoding the CCAAT-displacement protein transcription factor, is a Golgi membrane protein related to giantin. Mol. Biol. Cell 13:3761-3774.
17. Goulet, B., A. Baruch, N. S. Moon, M. Poirier, L. L. Sansregret, A. Erickson, M. Bogyo, and A. Nepveu. 2004. A cathepsin L isoform that is devoid of a signal peptide localizes to the nucleus in S phase and processes the CDP/Cux transcription factor. Mol. Cell 14:207-219.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Goulet, B., P. Watson, M. Poirier, L. Leduy, G. Berube, S. Meterissian, P. Jolicoeur, and A. Nepveu. 2002. Characterization of a tissue-specific CDP/Cux isoform, p75, activated in breast tumor cells. Cancer Res. 62:6625-6633.
19. Hanes, S. D., and R. Brent. 1989. DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9. Cell 57:1275-1283.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Kaul-Ghanekar, R., A. Jalota, L. Pavithra, P. Tucker, and S. Chattopadhyay. 2004. SMAR1 and Cux/CDP modulate chromatin and act as negative regulators of the TCRß enhancer (Eß). Nucleic Acids Res. 32:4862-4875.
21. Khanna-Gupta, A., T. Zibello, H. Sun, J. Lekstrom-Himes, and N. Berliner. 2001. C/EBP
mediates myeloid differentiation and is regulated by the CCAAT displacement protein (CDP/cut). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:8000-8005.
22. Ledford, A. W., J. G. Brantley, G. Kemeny, T. L. Foreman, S. E. Quaggin, P. Igarashi, S. M. Oberhaus, M. Rodova, J. P. Calvet, and G. B. Vanden Heuvel. 2002. Deregulated expression of the homeobox gene Cux-1 in transgenic mice results in downregulation of p27kip1 expression during nephrogenesis, glomerular abnormalities, and multiorgan hyperplasia. Dev. Biol. 245:157-171.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Li, S., B. Aufiero, R. L. Schiltz, and M. J. Walsh. 2000. Regulation of the homeodomain CCAAT displacement/cut protein function by histone acetyltransferases p300/CREB-binding protein (CBP)-associated factor and CBP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:7166-7171.
24. Lievens, P. M., J. J. Donady, C. Tufarelli, and E. J. Neufeld. 1995. Repressor activity of CCAAT displacement protein in HL-60 myeloid leukemia cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270:12745-12750.
25. Lievens, P. M., C. Tufarelli, J. J. Donady, A. Stagg, and E. J. Neufeld. 1997. CASP, a novel, highly conserved alternative-splicing product of the CDP/cut/cux gene, lacks cut-repeat and homeo DNA-binding domains, and interacts with full-length CDP in vitro. Gene 197:73-81.[CrossRef][Medline]
26. Liu, J., A. Barnett, E. J. Neufeld, and J. P. Dudley. 1999. Homeoproteins CDP and SATB1 interact: potential for tissue-specific regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:4918-4926.
27. Liu, J., D. Bramblett, Q. Zhu, M. Lozano, R. Kobayashi, S. R. Ross, and J. P. Dudley. 1997. The matrix attachment region-binding protein SATB1 participates in negative regulation of tissue-specific gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:5275-5287.[Abstract]
28. Luong, M. X., C. M. van der Meijden, D. Xing, R. Hesselton, E. S. Monuki, S. N. Jones, J. B. Lian, J. L. Stein, G. S. Stein, E. J. Neufeld, and A. J. van Wijnen. 2002. Genetic ablation of the CDP/Cux protein C terminus results in hair cycle defects and reduced male fertility. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:1424-1437.
29. Mailly, F., G. Berube, R. Harada, P. L. Mao, S. Phillips, and A. Nepveu. 1996. The human cut homeodomain protein can repress gene expression by two distinct mechanisms: active repression and competition for binding site occupancy. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:5346-5357.[Abstract]
30. Michallet, M. C., F. Saltel, X. Preville, M. Flacher, J. P. Revillard, and L. Genestier. 2003. Cathepsin-B-dependent apoptosis triggered by antithymocyte globulins: a novel mechanism of T-cell depletion. Blood 102:3719-3726.
31. Michl, P., A. R. Ramjaun, O. E. Pardo, P. H. Warne, M. Wagner, R. Poulsom, C. D'Arrigo, K. Ryder, A. Menke, T. Gress, and J. Downward. 2005. CUTL1 is a target of TGFß signaling that enhances cancer cell motility and invasiveness. Cancer Cell 7:521-532.[CrossRef][Medline]
32. Moon, N. S., P. Premdas, M. Truscott, L. Leduy, G. Berube, and A. Nepveu. 2001. S phase-specific proteolytic cleavage is required to activate stable DNA binding by the CDP/Cut homeodomain protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:6332-6345.
33. Moon, N. S., Z. W. Rong, P. Premdas, M. Santaguida, G. Berube, and A. Nepveu. 2002. Expression of N-terminally truncated isoforms of CDP/Cux is increased in human uterine leiomyomas. Int. J. Cancer 100:429-432.[CrossRef][Medline]
34. Moynagh, P. N. 2005. The NF-
B pathway. J. Cell Sci. 118:4589-4592.
35. Nagaich, A. K., D. A. Walker, R. Wolford, and G. L. Hager. 2004. Rapid periodic binding and displacement of the glucocorticoid receptor during chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell 14:163-174.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Nepveu, A. 2001. Role of the multifunctional CDP/Cut/Cux homeodomain transcription factor in regulating differentiation, cell growth and development. Gene 270:1-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Pattison, S., D. G. Skalnik, and A. Roman. 1997. CCAAT displacement protein, a regulator of differentiation-specific gene expression, binds a negative regulatory element within the 5' end of the human papillomavirus type 6 long control region. J. Virol. 71:2013-2022.[Abstract]
38. Quaggin, S. E., G. V. Heuvel, K. Golden, R. Bodmer, and P. Igarashi. 1996. Primary structure, neural-specific expression, and chromosomal localization of Cux-2, a second murine homeobox gene related to Drosophila cut. J. Biol. Chem. 271:22624-22634.
39. Robinson, G. W., R. A. McKnight, G. H. Smith, and L. Hennighausen. 1995. Mammary epithelial cells undergo secretory differentiation in cycling virgins but require pregnancy for the establishment of terminal differentiation. Development 121:2079-2090.[Abstract]
40. Rosen, J. M., S. L. Woo, and J. P. Comstock. 1975. Regulation of casein messenger RNA during the development of the rat mammary gland. Biochemistry 14:2895-2903.[CrossRef][Medline]
41. Ross, S. R., C. L. Hsu, Y. Choi, E. Mok, and J. P. Dudley. 1990. Negative regulation in correct tissue-specific expression of mouse mammary tumor virus in transgenic mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:5822-5829.
42. Scherer, S. W., E. J. Neufeld, P. M. Lievens, S. H. Orkin, J. Kim, and L. C. Tsui. 1993. Regional localization of the CCAAT displacement protein gene (CUTL1) to 7q22 by analysis of somatic cell hybrids. Genomics 15:695-696.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Seo, J., M. M. Lozano, and J. P. Dudley. 2005. Nuclear matrix binding regulates SATB1-mediated transcriptional repression. J. Biol. Chem. 280:24600-24609.
44. Sinclair, A. M., J. A. Lee, A. Goldstein, D. Xing, S. Liu, R. Ju, P. W. Tucker, E. J. Neufeld, and R. H. Scheuermann. 2001. Lymphoid apoptosis and myeloid hyperplasia in CCAAT displacement protein mutant mice. Blood 98:3658-3667.
45. Tavares, A. T., T. Tsukui, and B. J. Izpisua. 2000. Evidence that members of the Cut/Cux/CDP family may be involved in AER positioning and polarizing activity during chick limb development. Development 127:5133-5144.[Abstract]
46. Tufarelli, C., Y. Fujiwara, D. C. Zappulla, and E. J. Neufeld. 1998. Hair defects and pup loss in mice with targeted deletion of the first cut repeat domain of the Cux/CDP homeoprotein gene. Dev. Biol. 200:69-81.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Valarche, I., J. P. Tissier-Seta, M. R. Hirsch, S. Martinez, C. Goridis, and J. F. Brunet. 1993. The mouse homeodomain protein Phox2 regulates Ncam promoter activity in concert with Cux/CDP and is a putative determinant of neurotransmitter phenotype. Development 119:881-896.[Abstract]
48. Vanden Heuvel, G. B., R. Bodmer, K. R. McConnell, G. T. Nagami, and P. Igarashi. 1996. Expression of a cut-related homeobox gene in developing and polycystic mouse kidney. Kidney Int. 50:453-461.[Medline]
49. Wang, Z., A. Goldstein, R. T. Zong, D. Lin, E. J. Neufeld, R. H. Scheuermann, and P. W. Tucker. 1999. Cux/CDP homeoprotein is a component of NF-µNR and represses the immunoglobulin heavy chain intronic enhancer by antagonizing the bright transcription activator. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:284-295.
50. Welm, A. L., N. A. Timchenko, and G. J. Darlington. 1999. C/EBP
regulates generation of C/EBPß isoforms through activation of specific proteolytic cleavage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1695-1704.
51. Yoon, S. O., and D. M. Chikaraishi. 1994. Isolation of two E-box binding factors that interact with the rat tyrosine hydroxylase enhancer. J. Biol. Chem. 269:18453-18462.
52. Zhu, Q., and J. P. Dudley. 2002. CDP binding to multiple sites in the mouse mammary tumor virus long terminal repeat suppresses basal and glucocorticoid-induced transcription. J. Virol. 76:2168-2179.
53. Zhu, Q., K. Gregg, M. Lozano, J. Liu, and J. P. Dudley. 2000. CDP is a repressor of mouse mammary tumor virus expression in the mammary gland. J. Virol. 74:6348-6357.
54. Zhu, Q., U. Maitra, D. Johnston, M. Lozano, and J. P. Dudley. 2004. The homeodomain protein CDP regulates mammary-specific gene transcription and tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:4810-4823.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||