Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, October 2006, p. 7772-7782, Vol. 26, No. 20
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.00468-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laboratory for Pluripotent Cell Studies, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology (CDB), Minatojima-Minamimachi 2-2-3, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan,1 Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osaka University, Yamadaoka 1-6, Suita C., Osaka 565-0871, Japan,2 Stem Cell Regulation Research, Area of Molecular Therapeutics, Course of Advanced Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2-2, Suita C., Osaka 565-0871, Japan,3 Developmental Genomics and Aging Section, Laboratory of Genetics, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21224,4 Laboratory for Development and Regenerative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunokicho, Chu-o-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0017, Japan5
Received 17 March 2006/ Returned for modification 2 May 2006/ Accepted 15 August 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the interactions between tissue-specific transcription factors are those that occur during myocyte development, in which the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor MyoD is key in directing differentiation. Although MyoD can bind to the target sequence by cooperation with its partner E12/47 and recruit TFIID with its C-terminal domain, interactions with molecules such as MEF2, Sp1, and p300 are required for activation of target gene expression (41). Overexpression of MyoD can induce differentiation of myocytes only in particular cell types, due to the requirement of cellular factors for MyoD activity as well as the accessibility of the target sequence in chromatin.
In pluripotent stem cells, the undifferentiated phenotype is maintained by a combination of specific transcription factors. We previously reported that the POU family transcription factor Oct3/4 (encoded by Pou5f1) is necessary to maintain self renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cells (28). In ES cells, artificial repression of Oct3/4 induces differentiation toward the trophectoderm, whereas overexpression of Oct3/4 induces differentiation mainly to extraembryonic endoderm, indicating that an appropriate level of Oct3/4 expression is required for continuous propagation of ES cells. We hypothesized that overexpression of Oct3/4 resulted in partial interference with its function by a squelching mechanism in cooperation with its partner molecule (26). To date, however, the only molecule functionally identified as an Oct3/4 partner is the Sry-related HMG box transcription factor Sox2. Cooperation of Oct3/4 and Sox2 was initially detected on the Fibroblast growth factor 4 (Fgf4) enhancer (48) and subsequently observed on several other genes, including Opn (7), Utf1 (24), Fbox15 (42), and Nanog (17). Moreover, we found that both Oct3/4 and Sox2 were regulated in the same manner (32, 43), suggesting the general importance of this partnership in ES cells. Indeed, Sox2 function was also necessary for the establishment of ES cell lines from the inner cell mass (ICM) of blastocyst-stage embryos (2).
Although Sox2 is an important partner of Oct3/4, there is evidence suggesting that Oct3/4 functions differently in ES cells. For example, Zfp42/Rex1, which encodes a zinc finger transcription factor, was identified as a target of Oct3/4, but the partner of the latter was not identified (3). In addition, we recently reported that Oct3/4 variants maintained expression of Lefty1 in ES cells (27). In ES cells expressing the Oct3/4 variant lacking the N-terminal domain (NTD), all known Sox2-dependent target genes as well as Zfp42/Rex1 were expressed normally, but Lefty1 expression was dramatically reduced, suggesting that the mechanism of Oct3/4 regulation of Lefty1 expression is different from the mechanism by which it regulates expression of other genes. We therefore sought to determine the molecular mechanism by which Lefty1 gene expression is activated in ES cells. We found that the 1.3-kb genomic DNA fragment containing the promoter element of the Lefty1 gene was responsible for Oct3/4-dependent ES-specific transcriptional activity. We also found that Oct3/4 activates the ES-specific enhancer element in this fragment by cooperation with Sox2. Unlike their other known targets, however, the combination of Oct3/4 and Sox2 was not sufficient for activation of the Lefty1 promoter. Rather, a Krüppel-type zinc finger transcription factor, Klf4, was identified as a mediating factor that binds to the proximal element and cooperates with Oct3/4 and Sox2 on the distal enhancer in activating the Lefty1 promoter. Repression of Klf4 by RNA interference in ES cells resulted in downregulation of Lefty1 expression, and cooperation of Klf4 with Oct3/4 required the N-terminal domain of Oct3/4. We also found that Klf4 has physiological significance in activating a subset of Oct3/4 target genes in ES cells.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Activation of Lefty1 promoter by Oct3/4 and Sox2. (A) Activities of pLefty1-luc in ES cells maintained by mutant forms of Oct3/4. Relative expression levels of plefty1-luc (filled) and Fgf4tkluc (hatched) are shown. Fgf4tkluc has a tk minimal promoter ligated with the enhancer elements in which Oct3/4 and Sox2 can associate. The luciferase activity in ES cells expressing wild-type (wt) Oct3/4 was set at 1.0. (B) Relative activation of reporters by Oct3/4 and Sox2 in HeLa cells. The reporter plasmids were cotransfected with Oct3/4 and/or Sox2 expression vectors. The luciferase activity of reporter alone was set at 1.0. (C) Reactivation of reporters by Oct3/4 in Oct3/4-depleted ES cells. Reporter plasmids were transfected into ZHBTc4 ES cells, with or without Oct3/4 expression vector, and the cells were cultured with or without Tc. Resulting luciferase activities, relative to that in ES cells without Tc and Oct3/4 expression vector, are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Activation of the Lefty1 reporter by Klf4. (A) Activation of pLefty1-luc by various ES-specific transcription factors with (open) or without (filled) Oct3/4 and Sox2 expression vectors in HeLa cells. Induction of luciferase activity was measured relative to that of empty vector. (B) Activation of various reporters by Klf4 in HeLa cells. Reporter plasmids were cotransfected with empty or Klf4 expression vector into HeLa cells and the luciferase activities, relative to that of empty vector, were measured. (C) Activation of pLefty1-luc by Klf family members. pLefty1-luc was cotransfected with empty or Klf family expression vectors into HeLa cells and luciferase activities, relative to that of empty vector, were measured.
|
The entire open reading frames of cDNAs encoding transcription factors were subcloned into the pCAG-IP expression vector (27). Deletion mutants of Oct3/4 were made as described previously. Sox2 cDNA and the primers 5'-AACTCGAGCGCCCGCATGTATAACATGATG-3' (sense) and 5'-TTGCGGCCGCTAACCCAGGCCGGCGCCCACC-3' as well as 5'-TTGCGGCCGCCTACTCCTGCATCATGCTGTAG-3' and 5'-TTGCGGCCGCCTACATGTGCGACAGGGGCAG-3' (antisense) were used to generate
817,
895, and wild-type Sox-2, respectively. Klf4 cDNA and the primers of 5'-CCTCGAGGACCTTCTGGGCCCCCACATTAATG-3', 5'-CCTCGAGCCACCATGGCTTGCAGCAGTAACAACCC-3', 5'-CCTCGAGCCACCATGGCCGCCACCGTGACCACCTC-3', 5'-CCTCGAGCCACCATGGCGGTCCCGTGGTGCACGG-3' (sense), and 5'-CCGCGGCCGCACTACGTGGGATTTAAAAGTG-3' (antisense) for were used to generate wild-type,
80,
118, and
278 Klf4, respectively. All of these PCR products were digested with XhoI and NotI and inserted into the XhoI and NotI sites of pCAG-IP.
Cell culture, transfection, and luciferase assay. ZHBTc4 ES cells were maintained as described previously (28). For transfection of reporter plasmids, 3 x 104 cells were seeded in each well of a 24-well plate and incubated with 2 µg reporter plasmid and 0.02 µg of the internal control plasmid pRL-CMV, together with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's protocol. Luciferase assays were performed 24 h later using a dual-luciferase assay kit (Promega). The ES cell lines maintained by mutant forms of Oct3/4 were made as described previously (27).
EMSA. Probe DNA sequences are shown in Tables 1 . The Cy-5-labeled oligonucleotides were annealed and 2 as double-stranded probes. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed essentially as described previously (3). The whole-cell extracts (10 µg) were incubated on ice for 15 min with DNA probes containing the regulatory element of the Lefty1 gene. In competition assays, the whole-cell extracts were preincubated for 10 min with a 50-fold molar excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide and protein extracts prior to the addition of the probe mixture. For supershift experiments, protein extracts were preincubated for 30 min on ice with 0.2 µg of antibody to Klf4 (AB4138; Chemicon), Gata4 (sc-9053; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), Oct3/4, or Sox2 (AB5603; Chemicon). All resulting gels were scanned with a Fluorimager (Typhoon 8600; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. EMSA probes for Oct3/4 and Sox2
|
1548); Oct-Sox binding enhancer region, 5'-AAGCTGCAGACTTCATTCCA-3' and 5'-CGGGGGATAGATGAAGAAAC-3' (1264
1060); inner control region, 5'-ATAGCCACACACCCTTGTCC-3' and 5'-CAGACGAGGGGCAACATAGT-3'; Klf4 binding region, 5'-GTCCAGACAGGCTTTTGTGT-3' and 5'-AGTCTGCGGAGGAATGGTA-3' (147
+26); 3' control region, 5'-GACTCCTGTTCCACTGAACG-3' and 5'-AGGCCCTGAATGCTAACTCT-3' (+1105
+1343). Microarray analysis. DNA microarray analyses were performed as described previously (1), using an NIA Mouse 22K Microarray 2.0 (Dev2; Agilent Technologies), which contained the genes listed at the National Institute of Aging mouse cDNA project web site (http://lgsun.grc.nia.nih.gov/cDNA/cDNA.html). Briefly, 5 µg total RNA was transcribed into double-stranded T7 RNA polymerase-tagged cDNA and amplified into single-stranded, fluorescence-tagged cRNA by T7 polymerase. The samples for siKlf4 and mock transfectants were hybridized against a common reference pool of RNA at 60°C on the DNA microarrays. After washing, microarrays were scanned with an Agilent DNA Microarray Scanner. Complete array data will be available on the GEO (NCBI) website.
Knock-down analysis and QPCR. Each Klf4 short interfering RNA (5'-GACAUCGCCGGUUUAUAUUGA-3' and 5'-AAUAUAAACCGGCGAUGUCUU-3') was annealed and transfected into ES cells by use of the manufacturer's protocol (RNAi Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Total RNA was isolated from transfected cells, and the resulting cDNA was used in quantitative PCR (QPCR) with primers for Lefty1 (5'-TGTGTGTGCTCTTTGCTTCC-3' and 5'-GGGGATTCTGTCCTTGGTTT-3'), Klf4 (5'-CAAGTCCCCTCTCTCCATTATCAAGAG-3' and 5'-CCACTACGTGGGATTTAAAAGTGCCTC-3'), Oct3/4 (5'-CACGAGTGGAAAGCAACTCA-3' and 5'-AGATGGTGGTCTGGCTGAAC-3'), Sox2 (5'-ACATGTGAGGGCTGGACTGCGAAC-3' and 5'-GAAGCGCCTAACGTACCACTAGAAC-3'), Fgf4 (5'-GGGAGGCTACAGACAGCAAG-3' and 5'-CTGTGAGCCACCAGACAGAA-3'), Utf1 (5'-ACGTGGAGCATCTACGAGGT-3' and 5'-TAGACTGGGGGTCGTTTCTG-3'), Nanog (5'-ACCTGAGCTATAAGCAGGTTAAGAC-3' and 5'-GTGCTGAGCCCTTCTGAATCAGAC-3'), Fbx15 (5'-TCGCCTGCTTCCACTTACTT-3' and 5'-CATGCTGCTTCGTGACAGAT-3'), Rex1 (5'-GAGTTCGTCCATCTAAAAAGGGAGG-3' and 5'-TCTTAGCTGCTTCCTTGAACAATGCC-3'), and GAPDH (5'-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3' and 5'-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3').
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Identification of an Oct3/4-dependent enhancer in the Lefty1 gene. (A) Isolation of the mouse Lefty1 promoter. A 1,379-bp genomic DNA fragment, from 1297 to +82 relative to the transcription start site, was subcloned by PCR. Ch. 1, chromosome 1. (B) Oct3/4-dependent promoter activity of pLefty1-luc in ES cells. Reporter plasmids were transfected into ZHBTc4 ES cells, followed by culture with or without Tc. The ratios (Tc/+Tc) of the resulting luciferase activities are shown. (C and D) Oct3/4-dependent activities of deletion mutants of pLefty1-luc. (E and F) Enhancer activity of the element containing the putative Oct-Sox binding site. The activities of small deletion mutants (E) and pLefty1-luc with mutations in the Oct or Sox element (F) were assayed in ZHBTc4 ES cells (F). (G) EMSA of the Oct-Sox element. Wild-type (wt) Oct-Sox elements were incubated with ES nuclear extracts, with or without excess cold competitors (lanes 1 to 7), or incubated with antibodies to Oct3/4, Sox2, or Gata4 (lanes 8 to 10), as indicated, and subjected to EMSA. The sequences of the probes are shown in Table 1. Note that the supershifted bands (ss) and reduction of signal were obtained with each antibody.
|
The Oct3/4-dependent enhancer contains Oct3/4 and Sox2 binding sites. Within the 98-bp region carrying ESE, we found an atypical putative Oct3/4 binding sequence (TTCTGCAT) flanked by a typical Sox2 binding sequence (AACAAAG) but without a spacer between them (Fig. 1E). Similar combinations of these binding sites are found in several Oct3/4-dependent enhancers (Table 3). This region, however, has been reported to contain the NPE with an atypical FAST binding sequence between 1097 and 1081 (GTCTTACAATCCACTA) (35). Precise deletion analysis in this region revealed that the 28-bp region between 1163 and 1136, which contains the putative Oct3/4 and Sox2 binding sites, also contains the ESE activity (Fig. 1E). These data also indicated that ESE is separate from NPE.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Sequences of Oct3/4-Sox2 binding sitesa
|
To identify the complexes containing Oct3/4 and/or Sox2, we incubated the DNA fragment containing the Lefty1 ESE that was used with an ES cell extract in the presence or absence of cold probes or specific antibodies (Fig. 1G). These EMSA experiments showed that the upper complex was supershifted by either anti-Oct3/4 or anti-Sox2 antibodies, indicating that it contained both Oct3/4 and Sox2. In contrast, the lower complex was supershifted by anti-Sox2 antibody but not by anti-Oct3/4 antibody, indicating that it contained only Sox2. The inability to detect Oct3/4 complex suggests that Sox2 may bind to this binding site with higher affinity than Oct3/4.
The Oct3/4 and Sox2 binding motifs are conserved in the human LEFTY-B gene. Since functionally important regulatory sequences should be conserved in evolution, we compared the sequence of the human ortholog of Lefty1, LEFTY-B (47), with that of mouse Lefty1. We found that the Oct3/4 and Sox2 binding motifs were highly conserved between species (Table 3). Indeed, LEFTY-B is expressed in undifferentiated but not in differentiated human ES cells (6). A comparison of the Oct-Sox binding sites of the Fgf4, Utf1, Fbx15, Sox2, Oct3/4, and Nanog genes with that of Lefty1 found that they were highly conserved (Table 3). From these comparisons, we deduced that the consensus sequence of the Oct3/4-Sox2 binding sites was WWWWGCATWACAAWG (W = A or T).
The N-terminal domain of Oct3/4 is required for efficient activation of pLefty1-luc.
We have shown that Lefty1 expression is absent in ES cells maintained by an Oct3/4 variant lacking the N-terminal domain (NTD) (27). To test whether the regulatory element in pLefty1-luc is responsible for this phenomenon, we introduced pLefty1-luc into ES cell lines maintained by
N or
C variants of Oct3/4 (27). We found that pLefty1-luc showed significantly weaker activity in
N ES cells than in
C ES cells (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the reporter Utf1tk-luc showed only slightly weaker activity in
N ES cells than in
C ES cells, indicating that Oct3/4 activation of Lefty1 expression is dependent on the NTD of Oct3/4.
Oct3/4 and Sox2 are insufficient to activate pLefty1-luc in differentiated cells. The reporter assays in ES cells showed that pLefty1-luc expression was dependent on Oct3/4. To confirm the role of Oct3/4 and Sox2 in the activation of pLefty1-luc, we cotransfected Oct3/4 and Sox2 expression vectors, together with pLefty1-luc, into HeLa cells, but we observed no activation of pLefty1-luc expression (Fig. 2B). In contrast, both Fgf4tk-luc and Utf1tk-luc were efficiently activated under the same conditions (Fig. 2B), suggesting that an additional factor(s) in ES cells was required to activate pLefty1-luc.
Addition of Tc to ZHBTc4 ES cells has been found to completely deplete Oct3/4 within 24 h, repressing expression from all Oct3/4-dependent reporters (27). Since expression of endogenous Sox2 is maintained, activities of Fgf4tk-luc and Utf1tk-luc were restored by cotransfection of Oct3/4 expression vector alone (Fig. 2C). In contrast, pLefty1-luc was not activated under the same conditions (Fig. 2C), suggesting that the additional factor(s) required for activation of pLefty1-luc was downregulated by repression of Oct3/4.
Functional screening of an ES-specific factor for activation of pLefty1-luc. Since our results suggested that an unknown factor(s) expressed in undifferentiated ES cells is required to activate the Lefty1 promoter, we surveyed candidate transcription factors for their ability to activate pLefty1-luc in HeLa cells. Microarray analysis identified 11 candidate genes by their expression pattern after Oct3/4 repression (R. Matoba, H. Niwa, S. Masui, S. Ohtsuka, M. G. Carter, A. A. Sharov, and M. S. H. Ko, unpublished data). When we cotransfected expression vectors for these genes and pLefty1-luc with or without expression vectors for Oct3/4 and Sox2, we found that only one gene, Klf4, significantly activated pLefty1-luc. The Klf4 gene, which encodes a Krüppel-like zinc finger transcription factor, showed 8.8-fold activation of pLefty1-luc in the absence of Oct3/4 and Sox2 and 25.7-fold activation in their presence (Fig. 3A), indicating that it may be the missing factor.
Nonspecific activation may be observed under these artificial heterologous assay conditions. To exclude this possibility, we tested the specificity of pLefty1-luc activation by Klf4. Transfection of the Klf4 expression vector, together with reporters containing promoters for the Lefty1-luc, Oct3/4, Zfp42/Rex1, Utf1, and Tcl1 genes into HeLa cells, showed efficient activation of only pLefty1-luc (Fig. 3B). Significant activation was observed on the element at base pair 76 of Lefty1 (Lefty1
SacI), suggesting that Klf4 specifically activates the Lefty1 promoter via promoter-proximal elements.
Functional redundancy in Klf family members expressed in ES cells. Our microarray analysis showed that several Klf family members (14) are expressed in ES cells, with Klf2, Klf3, Klf4, and Klf9 showing stem cell-specific expression patterns (Matoba et al., unpublished), which was confirmed by quantitative PCR (QPCR) (data not shown). To test whether these four genes share redundant functions, we tested the ability of each to activate pLefty1-luc in HeLa cells; we also tested Klf5 because of its ability to compete with Klf4 (8). Of these five genes, only Klf2 showed significant ability to transactivate pLefty1-luc, although its activity was less than that of Klf4, suggesting that the function of these two genes overlaps in ES cells (Fig. 3C).
Klf4 acts as a cofactor of the Oct3/4-Sox2 complex. To determine the mechanism by which Klf4 cooperates with Oct3/4 and Sox2 to activate pLefty1-luc, we tested the ability of various combinations of these three gene products to transactivate pLefty1-luc. Although Oct3/4, Sox2, or the two together cannot activate pLefty1-luc, Klf4 alone significantly activated pLefty1-luc in HeLa cells (Fig. 4A). Addition of Oct3/4 or Sox2 to Klf4 enhanced this activation, and a combination of all three factors showed the highest activation of pLefty1-luc, indicating that the action of the distal enhancer activated by Oct3/4 and Sox2 is mediated by Klf4 binding to the proximal element to activate the Lefty1 core promoter.
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Cooperation of Oct3/4, Sox2, and Klf4 in activating the Lefty1 reporter. (A) Cooperative activation of the Lefty1 reporter by Oct3/4, Sox2, and Klf4. pLefty1-luc was cotransfected with various combinations of empty, Oct3/4, Sox2, and Klf4 expression vectors into HeLa cells, and luciferase activities were measured relative to that of empty vector. (B) Activation of the Lefty1 reporter by Oct3/4 variants. pLefty1-luc was cotransfected with expression vectors of Oct3/4 variants, Sox2, and Klf4 into HeLa cells, and luciferase activities were measured relative to that of empty vector. (C) Activation of the Lefty1 reporter by Sox2 variants. pLefty1-luc was cotransfected with expression vectors of Sox2 variants, Oct3/4, and Klf4 into HeLa cells, and luciferase activities were measured relative to that of empty vector. (D and E) Activation of the Lefty1 reporter by Klf4 variants. pLefty1-luc was cotransfected with expression vectors of Klf4 variants alone (D) or Klf4 variants plus Oct3/4 and Sox2 (E) into HeLa cells, and luciferase activities were measured relative to that of empty vector. wt, wild type.
|
N was transfected, indicating its inability to cooperate with Sox2 and Klf4, nor was pLefty1-luc activated when an Oct3/4 mutant lacking DNA binding ability (267V/P) (27) was transfected. In contrast, transfection of
C Oct3/4 could activate pLefty1-luc as well as wild-type Oct3/4. Interestingly, the DNA binding domain alone, designated
N
C, was sufficient for cooperation with Sox2 and Klf4. These data indicated that the heterologous transactivation system in HeLa cells mimics the situation in ES cells, that pLefty1-luc activation was dependent on the NTD of Oct3/4, and that the C-terminal domain might have an inhibitory effect in the synergic action on the Lefty1 transactivation.
We also tested the contribution of the two transactivation domains of Sox2, R1 and R3 (30). When Sox2 variants lacking R1 (
R1) were cotransfected with pLefty1-luc and expression vectors for Oct3/4 and Klf4, activation of pLefty1-luc was inhibited (Fig. 4C). Further deletion of R3, however, did not further reduce pLefty1-luc transactivation, suggesting that the R1 transactivation domain of Sox2 cooperates with Oct3/4 and Klf4 in activating pLefty1-luc.
Deletion of the transactivation domain of Klf4, between amino acids 80 and 118 (10), reduced pLefty1-luc activation (Fig. 4D) as well as its ability to cooperate with Oct3/4 and Sox2 (Fig. 4E), indicating that the transactivation domain of Klf4 is required for proper activation of the Lefty1 reporter.
Identification of Klf4 binding elements proximal to the Lefty1 promoter.
Lefty1
SacI consists of a 76-bp sequence upstream of the transcription start site. This reporter contains two putative Klf4 binding sites, K1 and K2 (Fig. 5A), that match the consensus sequence (RRGGYGY) (39) and are conserved in human LEFTY-B. Using EMSA, we tested the ability of Klf4 to bind to these sites (Fig. 5B). Using a probe containing both putative sites, we observed binding of recombinant Klf4 in COS cells. Of the complexes observed in ES cells, one showed the same mobility as that observed in COS cells. Complex formation was strongly inhibited by competition with cold wild-type K1 and weakly inhibited by competition with cold wild-type K2, suggesting that Klf4 binds to these sites with different affinities.
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Identification of Klf4 binding sites proximal to the Lefty1 core promoter. (A) Sequence around the Lefty1 core promoter in pLefty1 SacI-luc. Two putative Klf4 binding sites (K1 and K2) were identified proximal to the core promoter, both of which are conserved in human LEFTYB. Mutated sequences for K1m and K2m are also shown. (B) Contribution of the putative Klf4 binding sites to the Klf4-dependent activity of pLefty1 SacI-luc. pLefty1 SacI-luc derivatives with mutations in K1 and/or K2 or deletion of both sites were cotransfected with Klf4 or empty expression vector into HeLa cells, and luciferase activities were determined relative to that of empty vector. (C) Cell lysate of ES or Cos-7 cells transfected with Klf4 or empty expression vector was subjected to EMSA with or without competitor. All probes are described in Table 2. (D) ChIP assay of the Lefty1 distal enhancer, proximal element, and core promoter. Primers for QPCR were designed to detect the distal enhancer bound by Oct3/4 and Sox2 (region b), the proximal element bound by Klf4 and the core promoter (region d), and their flanking regions (a, c, and e) as controls. Chromatin samples derived from undifferentiated (ZHBTc4 Tc), differentiated (ZHBTc4 Tc+), and N ES cells were immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibody, followed by QPCR with normalization by input DNA. The amounts of region a were set at 1.0 in each set of analyses, and the relative signal intensities for regions b, c, d, and e were calculated.
|
To investigate the dynamics of recruitment of Klf4 at the proximal element and Oct3/4-Sox2 at the distal enhancer in vivo, ChIP analysis was performed in ES cells (Fig. 5D). Chromatin samples were prepared from undifferentiated (ZHBTc4 without Tc), differentiated (ZHBTc4 72 h after addition of Tc as a negative control), and
N ES cells, in which Lefty1 is activated, repressed, and inefficiently activated, respectively. When these chromatin samples were immunoprecipitated with either anti-Oct3/4, anti-Sox2, or anti-Klf4, significant accumulation of both the distal enhancer element (region b) and the region including the proximal element and the core promoter (region d) were observed from a chromatin sample of undifferentiated ES cells but not from that of differentiated ES cells. These data clearly demonstrate interaction between Oct3/4 and Sox2 on the distal enhancer and Klf4 on the proximal element to activate the Lefty1 core promoter in vivo. In
N ES cells, accumulation of region d by anti-Oct3/4 or anti-Sox2 was not observed, whereas weak enrichment of this region by anti-Klf4 was still observed. These data indicate that deletion of the N terminus of Oct3/4 caused its inability to form a stable regulatory complex on the distal enhancer with Sox2, resulting in inefficient recruitment of Klf4 on the proximal element and weak activation of the core promoter.
Physiological role of Klf4 in the activation of Oct3/4 targets including Lefty1. To confirm the physiological role of Klf4 on the expression of Lefty1 in ES cells, we analyzed gene expression patterns in ES cells following reduction of expression of Klf4. When we introduced short interfering RNA specific for Klf4 (siKlf4) into EB5 ES cells, we found that although these transfectants showed no morphological changes, QPCR analysis showed that the level of expression of Klf4 was reduced to 50% of that observed in mock transfectants, confirming the expected effect of siKlf4 in ES cells (Fig. 6A). When we assayed the level of expression of Oct3/4, Sox2 and their known target genes, including Lefty1, we found that only Lefty1 showed significantly reduced expression (Fig. 6A). Using a DNA microarray, we found that many genes were downregulated after repression of Klf4 (Fig. 6B). After normalization to mock transfectants, we identified 226 candidate Klf4 target genes. When we compared these genes with the 307 putative target genes positively regulated by Oct3/4 (Matoba et al., unpublished), we found 28 that overlapped, including Lefty1 (Fig. 6C). These results indicate that there is a set of target genes in ES cells whose expression may be regulated by cooperation of Klf4 and Oct3/4.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Klf4 target genes in ES cells. (A) Expression of stem cell marker genes in ES cells treated with siKlf4. Relative expression levels of each gene in ES cells treated with mock transfectant (filled; set at 1.0) or siKlf4 (hatched) was estimated by QPCR. (B) DNA microarray analyses of ES cells treated with siKlf4. Log ratios were plotted for genes with relative expression levels. The plot for Lefty1 is indicated. (C) Identification of putative target genes regulated by both Klf4 and Oct3/4. We identified 28 genes whose expression was dependent on both Klf4 and Oct3/4. (D) Activation of the 1200015N20Rik promoter by Klf4. 1200015N20Rik-luc, 6Wtk-luc, or tk-luc was cotransfected with empty or Klf4 expression vector into HeLa cells, and the luciferase activities relative to empty vector were determined. (E) Oct3/4 reactivation of reporters in Oct3/4-depleted ES cells. Reporter plasmids were transfected into ZHBTc4 ES cells with or without Oct3/4 expression vector, the cells were cultured with or without Tc, and luciferase activities relative to that in ES cells without Tc and Oct3/4 expression vector were determined.
|
|
|
|---|
The ability of Oct3/4 to cooperate with Sox2 was first identified on the Fgf4 enhancer and then found to be a common mechanism of Oct3/4 action (26). Activation by Oct3/4-Sox2 has been confirmed for various ES-specific enhancers, including those of Oct3/4 and Sox2 themselves (32, 43). We have shown here that Lefty1 can be added to this list. We previously reported that Lefty1 expression dramatically decreased in ES cells expressing an Oct3/4 variant lacking the NTD, whereas expression of all other known target genes was not affected (27 and data not shown), indicating that NTD dependency is unique to Lefty1. In addition, we found that pLefty1-luc is hardly activated by Oct3/4 and Sox2 in HeLa cells and shows poor reactivation by Oct3/4 in Oct3/4-depleted ES cells, whereas other Oct3/4-Sox2-dependent reporters are activated under these conditions. These observations are consistent with the specific recruitment of Klf4 to the proximal element of the Lefty1 core promoter. Indeed, all known Oct3/4-Sox2 binding elements shown above are distal enhancers located far from the core promoters, which require one or more promoter-proximal elements situated within 100 to 200 bp of the transcription start sites (4, 5, 9, 11, 12). We have shown here that Klf4 cooperates with Oct3/4 in an NTD-dependent manner and is expressed in ES cells in an Oct3/4-dependent manner. These findings indicate that the target genes of the Oct3/4-Sox2 complex can be categorized into different classes by their different dependencies on the cofactors recruited on the promoter-proximal elements. Our DNA microarray analysis revealed that there are only a few Klf4-dependent Oct3/4 target genes, suggesting the presence of a yet-unidentified partner molecule(s) (Fig. 7A).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Role of Klf4 in the activation of the Lefty1 promoter. (A) Differential promoter factor requirement for activation by Oct3/4 and Sox2. The Lefty1 promoter is activated by recruitment of Klf4 as a promoter factor, but requirements for the Utf1 and Oct3/4 promoters have not yet been identified. (B) Regulation of Lefty1 by ES-specific transcription factors. Oct3/4 and Sox2 are activated by themselves, and Klf4 is under the control of Oct3/4.
|
Although stem cell-specific expression of Lefty1/LEFTYB has been observed in human ES cells (6, 36, 45), its functional significance has not yet been demonstrated. Activin/Nodal signaling through Smad2/3 activation was recently reported to be necessary to maintain the pluripotent status of human ES cells (13, 44, 46). Interestingly, both human and mouse ES cells produce Nodal and Cripto, a component of the Nodal receptor, in stem cell-specific manners (6, 36). Since Lefty1 acts as an inhibitor of Activin/Nodal, overexpression of Lefty1 in human ES cells blocked this autocrine loop and the induction of differentiation (44). These findings suggest that Lefty1/LEFTYB may control the capacity for self renewal by competing with the Activin/Nodal autocrine loop. We demonstrated here that the ES-specific enhancer contributed to the activation of Lefty1 expression in a stem cell-specific manner, providing the opportunity to control self renewal by the stem cell-specific transcription factor network. Although it is not clear whether Lefty1 functions during embryogenesis in pluripotent cell populations, Lefty1-null embryos showed defective left-right axis determination (22). In contrast, Lefty2-null embryos died earlier, during the process of gastrulation (20), but they passed the early developmental stage without defects in pluripotent cell populations. Whether Lefty1 and Lefty2 have functional redundancy may be revealed by assaying double mutants, but this may be difficult to generate due to their proximity on mouse chromosome 1 (21).
Klf4 was initially identified as a Klf family member expressed in the gut (39). Klf4-null mice die within 15 h after birth due to a skin barrier defect caused by a perturbation in the differentiation of epidermis (38). A differentiation defect is also observed in the goblet cells of the colon in these knockout mice (15), indicating the indispensable function of Klf4 in the proper development of these organs. In contrast to Lefty1-null embryos, however, Klf4-null mice have no abnormalities in their pluripotent cell population during embryogenesis, indicating that Klf4 function is dispensable in the establishment and maintenance of pluripotency. In contrast, overexpression of Klf4 in mouse ES cells was found to prevent differentiation in embryoid bodies formed in suspension culture, suggesting that Klf4 contributes to ES self renewal (18). We also found that Klf4 overexpression can support leukemia inhibitory factor-independent self renewal of mouse ES cells (unpublished data). This discrepancy between loss- and gain-of-function phenotypes suggests that the former is masked by redundancy between closely related genes. In this case, Klf2 is a good candidate for a functionally overlapping gene, because we found it could activate the Lefty1 promoter and support leukemia inhibitory factor-independent self renewal. Klf2-null embryos died between 12.5 and 14.5 days postcoitum due to severe hemorrhaging (16). Analysis of Klf2/Klf4 double-null embryos may reveal their functions in pluripotent cells in embryos.
Since Oct3/4 is pivotal for maintaining pluripotency in ES cells (28) and during embryogenesis (23), analysis of its function is important for understanding the molecular mechanism governing pluripotency. Although cooperation with Sox2 is important for Oct3/4 function, this complex still requires additional partners to acquire physiological function. While our findings show that Klf4 is one of these partners, Klf4 is involved in the activation of only a subset of Oct3/4 target genes. However, the strategy we used to identify Klf4 should be a powerful tool to identify other partner molecules.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. EMSA probes for Klf4
|
Published ahead of print on 5 September 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»