| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Molecular and Cellular Biology, November 2006, p. 7832-7845, Vol. 26, No. 21
0270-7306/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/MCB.00534-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milano, Italy
Received 27 March 2006/ Returned for modification 5 May 2006/ Accepted 14 August 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Signal transduction upon DNA damage involves the sequential activation of protein kinases and dynamic association with other interactors or adaptors, together amplifying the signal elicited by even a single DNA lesion. In response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), the protein kinase defective in ataxia telangiectasia (38), plays a fundamental role as the first activator of the damage response (31) by phosphorylating a wide range of target proteins on a consensus sequence characterized by serine or threonine residue followed by a glutamine (SQ/TQ sites). For an effective activity on substrates, ATM requires Nbs1, which recruits and dramatically enhances the activity of ATM (14, 21, 22, 33).
Human Chk2, the homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 and Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cds1, is a kinase directly activated by phosphorylation on threonine 68 (T68) by ATM following DNA damage (5). Activated Chk2 propagates the damage signal through the phosphorylation of several targets involved in cell cycle phase progression or apoptosis (8). By phosphorylating Cdc25A and Cdc25C and targeting these proteins for degradation and sequestration in the cytoplasm, respectively (23, 35), Chk2 induces arrest at G1, S, and G2/M phases. Chk2 can also phosphorylate E2F-1, regulating its stability and transcriptional activity (50) and consequently apoptosis (45). Chk2 has been reported to phosphorylate p53, thereby enhancing the transcriptional activity of p53-responsive genes (51), although this event has been questioned in later investigations (28). The functional link between Chk2 and p53 in the DNA damage has been further substantiated in recent studies showing that Hdmx, a negative regulator of p53, is directly phosphorylated by Chk2 and this event accelerates Hdmx degradation (17, 32). Other known Chk2 substrates are Brca1 and PML (57, 58), implicated in DNA repair and apoptosis. Last, Chk2 has been shown to be involved in the replicative senescence signaling pathway in response to telomere erosion (24). The importance of Chk2 in the DNA damage response in cancer is underscored by the finding of CHK2 somatic mutations in various human tumors (reviewed in reference 8).
Chk2 shows three evolutionarily conserved domains: an N-terminal SQ/TQ cluster domain (SCD) (amino acids [aa] 19 to 69), which contains multiple consensus SQ/TQ phosphoresidues; a forkhead-associated (FHA) domain (aa 112 to 175); and a C-terminal catalytic domain (aa 220 to 486). ATM phosphorylates Chk2 primarily on T68 (4), which promotes Chk2 oligomerization through phospho-SCD/FHA interactions. The autophosphorylation step within the activation loop of the kinase domain (T383 and T387) then promotes the full activity of Chk2 (47). This multistep process allows the tightly controlled amplification of the DNA damage signal response.
In this study, we describe the phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35 residues in vivo in response to DNA damage and their regulatory roles in Chk2 activation and function.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids and transfections.
The full-length wild-type Chk2 cDNA was cloned in the EcoRI/NotI sites of
pCDNA3-HA and pCDNA3-FLAG vectors. Alanine substitutions on T68,
S33/35, S33, and S35 were introduced with the QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), while Ser19-to-Ala and Lys249-to-Arg (K249R to produce a kinase-dead Chk2
[Chk2-KD]) substitutions were introduced with the Gene Editor kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The forward primers used were as follows: 5'-GCTCCTTAGAGACAGTGTCCgCTCAGGAACTCTATTCTATTC-3'
for the T68A mutation, 5'-TCCCAAGGCTCCTCCgCACAGgCCCAGGGCATATC-3'
for S33A and S35A mutations, 5'-CCCAAGGCTCCTCCgCACAGTCCCAGGGC-3'
for S33A, and 5'-GGCTCCTCCTCACAGgCCCAGGGCATATC for
S35A. Primers to obtain S19A and Chk2-KD mutants, respectively, were as follows:
5'-CAGTGCCTGTgCACAGCCCCATG-3' and 5'-AAAGTAGCCATAAgaATCATCAGCAAAAG-3'.Lowercase letters indicate mutated bases. To obtain the S19A S33A S35A mutant (S3A), the HA-Chk2 S19A coding vector was subsequently mutagenized using the QuikChange II kit and the same primer used to
introduce S33A and S35A mutations in the HA-Chk2 Ser33A/S35A construct.
To obtain the HA-Chk2-KD-FHA
mutant, two PCR fragment (encoding aa 1 to 115 and 175 to 543) were cloned in the pCDNA3-HA vector. For stable suppression of Chk2 by short hairpin RNA
interference, MCF7 cells were transfected with the pRetro-SUPER vector
(kindly provided by Reuven Agami, The Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands) carrying Chk2 (pSUPER-Chk2 [ATCTTTATAAGACAGTCCTCTT]) or green fluorescent protein (GFP) (pSUPER-GFP [5'-CAAGCUGACCCUGAAGUUC-3']) interference sequences (the latter used as a negative control). Following selection with 1 µg/ml puromycin, single clones were
expanded and characterized for Chk2 protein expression. For complementation experiments in MCF7 cells in which endogenous Chk2 was silenced by short hairpin RNA (shRNA), the pCDNA3-HA-Chk2wt
and pCDNA3-HA-Chk2S33A/S35A constructs were engineered with two silent mutations inserted within the region targeted by the Chk2 shRNA (the forward primer used was
5'-CTCAAGAAGAGGACTGTCTcATtAAGATTACTGATTTTGGGC-3'). In this way, the shChk2 RNA, while interfering with the endogenous Chk2 mRNA, did not interfere with the ectopic Chk2 cDNAs. The constructs
were transfected in the shChk2-MCF7 cells, and selection was carried
out with 400 µg/ml G418. The full-length wild-type Chk2 cDNA
and the triple mutant S3A were then introduced in the pEGFP and
pdsRed-2 vectors to produce GFP and Red2 fusion proteins, respectively.
These constructs were transfected into MCF7 and HCT15 cell lines, and
when indicated, positive cells were purified by fluorescence-activated
cell sorting (FACS). Exponentially growing cells were transiently
transfected with the constructs using TransFast (Promega) according to
the manufacturer's instructions. Stable transfectants of MCF7 and HCT15
cells were obtained by selection for 2 weeks in G418 (600 µg/ml
and 1,200 µg/ml, respectively). ATR silencing was achieved by
transfection of U2OS cells with an ON-TARGET plus SMART pool (Dharmacon
Research, Lafayette, CO).
Immunoblot analyses. Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (11). Mouse monoclonal anti-Chk2 antibody 44D4/21 was generated in-house (12), while rabbit antibodies specific for Chk2 phosphoresidues T68, S19, S33/35, and T387 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA) and used to detect T387 (1:400), S19 (1:800), and S33/35 and T68 (1:1,000). The specificity of these phospho-specific antibodies was confirmed on immunoblots of cells ectopically expressing Ser-to-Ala mutants of Chk2 at residues 19, 33, and 35 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Note that anti-phospho-S33/S35 reacted with both S33 and S35 phosphoresidues, since the binding to single Ser-to-Ala substitutions was not abolished. The specificity and sensitivity of each phospho-specific antibody were also evaluated by indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays on phosphorylated peptides adsorbed on microtiter plates and/or by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) on a nitrocellulose membrane spotted with constitutively phosphorylated bacterial recombinant glutathione S-transferase-Chk2 protein (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-purified peptides with phosphorylated Ser19 or Thr68 were synthesized by Primm (Milan, Italy), whereas the peptide with phosphorylated Ser33 and Ser35 residues was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Monoclonal antibodies against FLAG tag (clone M2; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), hemagglutinin (HA) tag (clone 12CA5; Roche, Mannheim, Germany), ß-actin (Sigma), Hdmx (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX), and cyclin B1 (clone GNS-1; BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) and rabbit antibodies against ATR (ABR Inc., Golden, CO), pS317 Chk1 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), and GFP (Santa Cruz BioTechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were used. Antibody binding to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes was revealed by ECL Super Signal (Pierce, Rockford, IL) on autoradiographic films. Densitometric analyses of scanned bands were performed with the ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
FACS. Staining and sorting of viable G1, S, and G2-M fractions were performed as described previously (18). Briefly, LBCs were irradiated, incubated for 25 min, treated with 10 mg/ml of the DNA-specific permeable dye Hoechst 33342 (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) and harvested 20 min later. Cells were separated according to cell cycle phase with a FACS-Vantage sorter (BD Biosciences) equipped with a UV argon ion laser and a sample refrigeration system.
Immunoprecipitations and in vitro kinase reactions.
Cells were lysed on ice for 30 min in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.2% Triton X-100, 0.3%
NP-40, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA plus protease and phosphatase
inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 1 µg/ml
pepstatin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 25 mM
NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4). Lysates were clarified by
centrifugation, precleared for 1 h with 10 µl
Sepharose-protein G (Sigma), and immunoprecipitated at 4°C for
2 h with 5 µg of the anti-Chk2 monoclonal antibody
44D4/21 using 10 µl of Sepharose-protein G. Kinase reactions
were carried out at 30°C for 30 min in 20-µl volume
containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM EDTA, 1
mM dithiothreitol, 10 µM ß-glycerophosphate, 1 mM NaF,
0.1 mM Na3VO4, 0.1 mM PMSF, 10 µM ATP, 20
µCi [
-32P]ATP, and 1 µg of
glutathione S-transferase-Cdc25C fragment as a
substrate (53). Reaction
products were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, autoradiographed, and immunoblotted for Chk2 to verify
the amount of immunoprecipitated protein per
sample.
Gel filtration and dimerization analysis. Whole-cell extracts were prepared from untreated or IR-treated LBCs or HCT15 cells with NETN buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% NP-40). Extracts (250 µl) were loaded on a Superdex 200 HR 10/30 gel filtration column (Amersham Biosciences, United Kingdom) equilibrated with NETN buffer and run in the same buffer at a flow rate of 0.4 to 0.5 ml/min (55). Twenty fractions of 400 to 500 µl in the 30- to 600-kDa range were collected. The column was calibrated using 100 µl of gel filtration molecular weight markers (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). To evaluate the ability of Chk2 to homodimerize, HCT15 cells were cotransfected with HA-tagged wild-type Chk2 (HA-Chk2wt) and FLAG-Chk2wt or alternatively with HA-Chk2S3A and FLAG-Chk2S3A. After 24 h, cells were exposed to 0 or 10 Gy of IR and 1 h later lysed with NETN buffer. Lysates were precleared for 1 h with Sepharose-protein G and immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibody for 3 h at 4°C. Immunoprecipitated complexes were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted with an anti-FLAG antibody.
G1/S transition analysis. HCT15 cells were transfected with the GFP fusion constructs described above and 24 h later treated for 30 min with 10 µM bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and 200 ng/ml nocodazole (2), then harvested (untreated sample) or irradiated with 10 Gy, and collected 6 and 24 h later. Cells were labeled by double-color immunofluorescence with a polyclonal anti-GFP and monoclonal anti-BrdU antibodies. Three hundred GFP-positive cells were evaluated for BrdU staining.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Gy (Fig.
1A). Similar analyses were performed on cells from an AT
patient (AT52RM, carrying heterozygous ATM mutations 7327C and
T/8365delA, null for ATM protein)
(19) and two NBS patients
(GM07078 and 1548, homozygous for the NBS1 mutation 657del5
and 835del4, respectively). These cell lines, characterized by impaired
Chk2 activation (11,
13,
15), revealed virtually
no detectable phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35 in response to 4 Gy of
IR, whereas phosphorylation of T68 was very faint in the cell line from
the AT patient and about 50% lower in both NBS cell lines (Fig.
1A; results summarized in
Fig. 1B).
|
These data demonstrate that at least four residues within the SCD of Chk2 are responsive in vivo to IR and that in contrast to phosphorylation of T68, which primes Chk2 for activation (4), phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35 enhances Chk2 activity. Moreover, like ATM, the full-length Nbs1 (which is absent in NBS cells), is required for the phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35, but unlike ATM, it is relatively dispensable for T68 phosphorylation, underscoring the functional requirement of Nbs1 for ATM activity, essential for full activation of Chk2.
S19, S33/S35, and T68 phosphorylations are not interdependent nor influenced by the catalytic integrity of Chk2.
The roles
of these phosphoresidues in relation to Chk2 activation were evaluated
in the HCT15 cells, which carry a mutation in the CHEK2 gene
and express limiting amounts of Chk2 with undetectable kinase activity
(9,
55). In these cells
stably transfected with expression constructs encoding Chk2 with
alanine substitutions at S19, S33/S35, and T68, we found an apparently
normal IR-induced phosphorylation of the Chk2-T68A mutant on S19 and
S33/S35, like the phosphorylation of Chk2-S33A/S35A and Chk2-S19A on
T68 (Fig.
2A), thus excluding an interdependence of these phosphorylations in vivo. On
the contrary, a kinase-dead Chk2 ectopically expressed in HCT15 cells
(see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material) exhibited reduced
phosphorylation of these residues after IR (Fig.
2B). This result could be
explained by the requirement of the autocatalytic activity for optimal
phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35 but could also be explained by an
extensive dimerization of Chk2-KD through an SCD/FHA interaction, as
previously found even in the absence of DNA damage
(47), that might hinder
the phosphorylation of these residues. To test this possibility,
Chk2-KD deleted of its FHA domain (Chk2-KD-FHA
),
thus unable to dimerize, was ectopically expressed in HCT15 cells and
examined for S33/S35 phosphorylation, but compared to
Chk2wt, Chk2-KD-FHA
showed the same
level of S33/S35 phosphorylation (Fig.
2B). These results suggest
that the defective phosphorylation of S33/S35 in Chk2-KD might arise
from a steric hindrance effect as a result of its
dimerization.
|
|
|
S19 and S33/S35 are phosphorylated predominantly in G1 phase in response to IR. Because Chk2 regulates multiple cell cycle transitions, we examined its phosphorylation in relation to cell cycle phases in samples sorted by FACS according to DNA content (Fig. 5A). No differences in the overall level or electrophoretic mobility of Chk2 were observed between cell cycle phases before IR (data not shown), but Chk2 from irradiated cells migrated more slowly in G1 and G2-M phase cells than in S-phase cells (Fig. 5B). These differently migrating forms of Chk2 could not be clearly detected in unfractionated samples, probably because of the preponderance of G1 cells (70 to 80% of the total). Analysis of S33/S35, S19, and T68 in Chk2 immunoprecipitated from unirradiated sorted samples revealed no phosphorylation of these residues in any of the cell cycle phases (data not shown), but in samples sorted 45 min after IR treatment, S33/S35, S19 and, to a lesser extent, T387 became phosphorylated in the G1 phase only, while T68 became phosphorylated in all phases (Fig. 5B). The G1-phase-restricted phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35 was also detectable 10 min after IR (Fig. 5C) and even in the presence of the protein phosphatase inhibitor calyculin A (data not shown), the latter arguing against a role for a phosphatase in dephosphorylating S19 and S33/S35 residues in S and G2-M phases. Notably, besides lymphoblastoid cells, the G1-phase-restricted phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35 was also seen in hTERT-immortalized ovarian epithelial cells (data not shown). To establish a role for these phosphorylations, in vitro Chk2 kinase assays were performed on irradiated samples separated according to the cell cycle phases. The results showed that the IR-induced catalytic activity of Chk2, though maximal in G1, was also detectable in G2/M phase cells and to a lower extent in S-phase cells (Fig. 5D). Together, these data demonstrate that Chk2 undergoes a differential phosphorylation in G1 and S-G2/M after DNA damage, but this affects the catalytic activity of Chk2 through the cell cycle phases only partly.
|
|
S19 and S33/S35 phosphoresidues and stability of Hdmx. It was recently reported that Chk2 phosphorylates Hdmx protein and targets it for degradation after DNA damage (17, 41, 44). We therefore evaluated the effects of S19 and S33/S35 on Hdmx in vivo on MCF7 cells in which the endogenous Chk2 was silenced with shRNA (MCF7-shChk2) and that were complemented with constructs encoding Chk2wt or Chk2S3A (two silent mutations introduced in these vectors within the shRNA-Chk2 binding sequence prevented reinduction of endogenous Chk2 [see Materials and Methods for details]). Whereas MCF7-shChk2 cells were quite unable to degrade Hdmx after IR (Fig. 7) (>1.1-fold reduction compared to >5-fold reduction of the mock-silenced cells), complementation with Chk2wt restored the capacity to degrade Hdmx (>4.7-fold reduction [Fig. 7]). On the other hand, the radiation-induced proteolysis of Hdmx was only partially restored by Chk2S3A (<1.5-fold reduction [Fig. 7]).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have
identified three serine phosphoresidues (S19, S33, and S35) located in
the amino-terminal SQ/TQ-rich region of Chk2 that provides a consensus
motif for phosphorylation by ATM. In vivo phosphorylation of these
serine residues in normal cells was rapidly induced in response to IR
doses of >1 Gy (generating >19 DSBs/cell), in contrast
to the phosphorylation of T68 occurring in response to much lower doses
of IR (
0.25 Gy, estimated to generate <8 DSBs/cell).
Interestingly, Chk2 autophosphorylation at T387 occurred at a later
time point (45 to 90 min), when phosphorylation levels of T68, S19, and
S33/S35 decreased markedly, suggesting that these residues serve as a
trigger for Chk2 activation. Given that the proteasome inhibitor ALLN
did not prevent the decline in T68, S19, and S33/S35 phosphorylation
levels, our results are consistent with dephosphorylation rather than
proteolytic degradation to account for this phenomenon. In addition,
the SCD appears to have a dual function, i.e., to initially promote
Chk2 activation through SCD phosphorylation and to limit the
amplification of the number of activated Chk2 molecules through its
dephosphorylation.
Phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35 was normal
in an T68A mutant, indicating the independence of these events.
Conversely, phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35 was markedly attenuated
in Chk2-KD, possibly reflecting a hindering effect played by Chk2
oligomerization rather than catalytic loss, as demonstrated by the
efficient phosphorylation of these residues in
Chk2-KD-FHA
, a mutant form of Chk2 that is unable
to oligomerize because of the deletion of the FHA domain
(5).
The rapidity of S19 and S33/S35 phosphorylation is consistent with a direct activity of ATM on these residues. Indeed, the absence of S19 and S33/S35 phosphorylation in two NBS cell lines lacking full-length Nbs1 protein expression, together with the impaired activity of ATM towards its substrates (14, 26, 54), further supports this contention. The partial phosphorylation of T68 in NBS cells might thus be explained by the differential affinity of ATM, much greater for T68 than for S19 and S33/S35 (39). Therefore, the ability of Nbs1 to increase ATM affinity for its substrate (43) should be dispensable for T68 phosphorylation and indispensable for S19 and S33/S35 phosphorylation. Such a model is also supported by the lack of S19 and S33/S35 phosphorylation in response to IR doses of <1 Gy which nevertheless vigorously activate ATM (7). The role of ATM in S19 and S33/S35 phosphorylation was also highlighted by the fact that neither 4-NQO nor HU treatment affected these residues. Conversely, T68 was phosphorylated by 4-NQO and HU, although in an ATM-independent and ATR-dependent manner, again differentiating between these phosphorylation events. Our results with an ATR-defective Seckel cell line and ATR-silenced cells excluded an involvement of ATR in the IR-induced phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35.
We evaluated the molecular roles of S19 and S33/S35 in MCF7 cells, characterized by a normal ATM-Chk2- and p53-dependent DNA damage response, and in HCT15 cells, which lack endogenous Chk2, stably transfected with single (S19A), double (S33A S35A) or triple (S19A S33A S35A) Chk2 mutants. In these cells, the overall nuclear distribution of Chk2 and relocalization of phospho-T68 in IR-induced foci was unaffected by Ser-to-Ala mutations in S19/S33/S35 (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). In vitro kinase assays revealed deficient autophosphorylation and trans phosphorylation catalytic activities by Chk2S19A, Chk2S33A/S35A, and Chk2S3A, thus implicating these serine residues in the activation of Chk2. Size fractionation analysis of cell extracts from transiently transfected HCT15 cells revealed a marked decrease in the amount of mutant Chk2 in the fractions corresponding to 161 to 238 kDa, suggesting that the Ser-to-Ala substitutions impair Chk2 dimerizations. This observation was confirmed by a direct analysis of the dimerization ability of Chk2, obtained by using two different tagged forms of the protein, and is in accordance with the model proposed for its activation recently supported by crystallographic analysis (42).
Mdmx, an important regulator of p53, was recently shown to be phosphorylated by Chk2 on Ser367 after DNA damage, causing ubiquitination and degradation of Mdmx and activation of p53 (17, 32, 41, 44). We have shown that in cells with stably silenced endogenous Chk2, ectopic Chk2wt restored the IR-induced degradation of Hdmx, whereas Chk2S3A had a partial effect, suggesting a role for S19 and S33/S35 in the Chk2/Hdmx pathway, leading to p53 accumulation and apoptosis in response to a high level of DNA damage.
Analysis of Chk2 in relation to the cell cycle revealed that in response to radiation, T68 became phosphorylated in G1, S, and G2/M, whereas S19 and S33/S35, and to a lower extent T387, became phosphorylated in G1 phase only. This event was observed not only in lymphoblastoid cells but also in hTERT-immortalized epithelial cells. One mechanism to account for this cell cycle-restricted phosphorylation might depend on the activity of a kinase that specifically targets (in an ATM-dependent manner) these residues in the G1 phase, as in the case of other target substrates of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in yeast (49) and mammalian cells (20). Alternatively, a phosphatase(s) might selectively dephosphorylate S19 and S33/S35 in S and G2/M, assuming that DNA damage induces phosphorylation of these residues in all phases of the cell cycle. However, preliminary results with phosphatase inhibitors, e.g., calyculin A or orthovanadate (data not shown), would argue against the latter possibility.
Whatever the underlying mechanism, the biological significance of the G1 phase-restricted phosphorylation of S19 and S33/S35 remains unclear, given that the radiation-induced Chk2 kinase activity, though maximal in G1 phase cells (4.3-fold), was also seen in G2/M phase cells (2.6-fold) and to a lower extent in S-phase (2.1-fold) cells. This would be compatible with Chk2 playing a major role in G1/S checkpoint arrest in the presence of a high level of DNA damage and with the restoration of the G1/S checkpoint in Chk2 null cells (Fig. 9) (23) by the wild-type Chk2, but not by the S3A mutant Chk2. It is possible that this phosphorylated form of Chk2, occurring in response to >18 DSBs/cell, might provide a more effective and sustained G1 arrest to prevent replication of cells with damaged DNA that reenter G1 after escaping mitotic checkpoint arrest.
Finally, we showed that ectopic expression of wild-type Chk2 in the absence of de novo DNA damage has an antiproliferative effect, possibly reflecting a constitutive trans autophosphorylation and activation of Chk2 when overexpressed (47) and, in turn, an increased apoptotic cell death and senescence, as recently reported (16). Conversely, the Chk2S3A mutant lacked the antiproliferative activity of Chk2wt, underscoring the biological role of S19 and S33/S35 phosphoresidues in Chk2 activity.
Together, our data shed light on several aspects of the intricate and tightly coordinated phosphorylation events leading to the ATM-dependent functional activation of Chk2 kinase. Finally, the differential phosphorylation of Chk2 at multiple residues as a function of the IR dose (T68 is responsive to even 0.25 Gy, estimated to generate <8 DSBs/cell, whereas S19 and S33/S35 are responsive to >1 Gy, estimated to generate >19 DSBs/cell [12]) might represent a mechanism by which ATM fine-tunes Chk2's pleiotropic responses to increasing numbers of genotoxic lesions.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC), Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata), Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche (CNR), and Telethon (grant GGP05226B).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 28 August 2006. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://mcb.asm.org/. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Agami, R., and R. Bernards. 2000. Distinct initiation and maintenance mechanisms cooperate to induce G1 cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Cell 102:55-66.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Ahn,
J., and C. Prives. 2002. Checkpoint kinase 2 (Chk2)
monomers or dimers phosphorylate Cdc25C after DNA damage regardless of
threonine 68 phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem.
277:48418-48426.
4. Ahn,
J. Y., J. K. Schwarz, H. Piwnica-Worms, and
C. E. Canman. 2000. Threonine 68
phosphorylation by ataxia telangiectasia mutated is required for
efficient activation of Chk2 in response to ionizing radiation.Cancer Res.
60:5934-5936.
5. Ahn,
J. Y., X. Li, H. L. Davis, and C. E.
Canman. 2002. Phosphorylation of threonine 68 promotes
oligomerization and autophosphorylation of the Chk2 protein kinase via
the forkhead-associated domain. J. Biol. Chem.
277:19389-19395.
6. Alderton,
G. K., H. Joenje, R. Varon, A. D. Borglum,
P. A. Jeggo, and M. O'Driscoll. 2004. Seckel
syndrome exhibits cellular features demonstrating defects in the
ATR-signalling pathway. Hum. Mol. Genet.
13:3127-3138.
7. Bakkenist, C. J., and M. B. Kastan. 2003. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 421:499-506.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Bartek, J., and J. Lukas. 2003. Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. Cancer Cell 3:421-429.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Bell,
D. W., J. M. Varley, T. E. Szydlo,
D. H. Kang, D. C. Wahrer, K. E. Shannon,
M. Lubratovich, S. J. Verselis, K. J. Isselbacher,
J. F. Fraumeni, J. M. Birch, F. P. Li,
J. E. Garber, and D. A. Haber.1999
. Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in
Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Science
286:2528-2531.
10. Brown,
A. L., C. H. Lee, J. K. Schwarz, N.
Mitiku, H. Piwnica-Worms, and J. H. Chung.1999
. A human Cds1-related kinase that functions
downstream of ATM protein in the cellular response to DNA damage.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:3745-3750.
11. Buscemi,
G., C. Savio, L. Zannini, F. Micciche, D. Masnada, M. Nakanishi, H.
Tauchi, K. Komatsu, S. Mizutani, K. Khanna, J. Chen, P.
Concannon, L. Chessa, and D. Delia. 2001. Chk2
activation dependence on Nbs1 after DNA damage. Mol. Cell.
Biol.
21:5214-5222.
12. Buscemi, G., P. Perego, N. Carenini, M. Nakanishi, L. Chessa, J. Chen, K. Khanna, and D. Delia. 2004. Activation of ATM and Chk2 kinases in relation to the amount of DNA strand breaks.Oncogene 23:7691-7700.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Cerosaletti,
K., and P. Concannon. 2004. Independent roles for
nibrin and Mre11-Rad50 in the activation and function of Atm.J. Biol. Chem.
279:38813-38819.
14. Cerosaletti,
K., J. Wright, and P. Concannon. 2006. Active role for
nibrin in the kinetics of ATM activation. Mol. Cell.
Biol.
26:1691-1699.
15. Chaturvedi, P., W. K. Eng, Y. Zhu, M. R. Mattern, R. Mishra, M. R. Hurle, X. Zhang, R. S. Annan, Q. Lu, L. F. Faucette, G. F. Scott, X. Li, S. A. Carr, R. K. Johnson, J. D. Winkler, and B. B. Zhou. 1999. Mammalian Chk2 is a downstream effector of the ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway.Oncogene 18:4047-4054.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Chen,
C. R., W. Wang, H. A. Rogoff, X. Li, W. Mang, and
C. J. Li. 2005. Dual induction of apoptosis
and senescence in cancer cells by Chk2 activation: checkpoint
activation as a strategy against cancer. Cancer Res.
65:6017-6021.
17. Chen, L., D. M. Gilkes, Y. Pan, W. S. Lane, and J. Chen. 2005. ATM and Chk2-dependent phosphorylation of MDMX contribute to p53 activation after DNA damage.EMBO J. 24:3411-3422.[CrossRef][Medline]
18. Delia, D., K. Goi, S. Mizutani, T. Yamada, A. Aiello, E. Fontanella, G. Lamorte, S. Iwata, C. Ishioka, S. Krajewski, J. C. Reed, and M. A. Pierotti. 1997. Dissociation between cell cycle arrest and apoptosis can occur in Li-Fraumeni cells heterozygous for p53 gene mutations. Oncogene 14:2137-2147.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Delia, D., S. Mizutani, S. Panigone, E. Tagliabue, E. Fontanella, M. Asada, T. Yamada, Y. Taya, S. Prudente, S. Saviozzi, L. Frati, M. A. Pierotti, and L. Chessa. 2000. ATM protein and p53-serine 15 phosphorylation in ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) patients and AT heterozygotes. Br. J. Cancer 82:1938-1945.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Delia, D., E. Fontanella, C. Ferrario, L. Chessa, and S. Mizutani.2003 . DNA damage-induced cell-cycle phase regulation of p53 and p21waf1 in normal and ATM-defective cells.Oncogene 22:7866-7869.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Difilippantonio, S., A. Celeste, O. Fernandez-Capetillo, H. T. Chen, B. Reina San Martin, F. Van Laethem, Y. P. Yang, G. V. Petukhova, M. Eckhaus, L. Feigenbaum, K. Manova, M. Kruhlak, R. D. Camerini-Otero, S. Sharan, M. Nussenzweig, and A. Nussenzweig. 2005. Role of Nbs1 in the activation of the Atm kinase revealed in humanized mouse models. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:675-685.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Dupre, A., L. Boyer-Chatenet, and J. Gautier. 2006. Two-step activation of ATM by DNA and the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13:451-457.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Falck, J., N. Mailand, R. G. Syljuasen, J. Bartek, and J. Lukas.2001 . The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis. Nature 410:842-847.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Gire, V., P. Roux, D. Wynford-Thomas, J. M. Brondello, and V. Dulic. 2004. DNA damage checkpoint kinase Chk2 triggers replicative senescence. EMBO J. 23:2554-2563.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Guo,
Z., A. Kumagai, S. X. Wang, and W. G. Dunphy.2000
. Requirement for Atr in phosphorylation of Chk1 and
cell cycle regulation in response to DNA replication blocks and
UV-damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. Genes Dev.
14:2745-2756.
26. Horejsi, Z., J. Falck, C. J. Bakkenist, M. B. Kastan, J. Lukas, and J. Bartek. 2004. Distinct functional domains of Nbs1 modulate the timing and magnitude of ATM activation after low doses of ionizing radiation. Oncogene 23:3122-3127.[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Ismail,
I. H., S. Nystrom, J. Nygren, and O. Hammarsten.2005
. Activation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated by DNA
strand break-inducing agents correlates closely with the number of DNA
double strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem.
280:4649-4655.
28. Jallepalli,
P. V., C. Lengauer, B. Vogelstein, and F. Bunz.2003
. The Chk2 tumor suppressor is not required for p53
responses in human cancer cells. J. Biol.
Chem.
278:20475-20479.
29. Kastan, M. B., and J. Bartek. 2004. Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 432:316-323.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Khanna, K. K., and S. P. Jackson. 2001. DNA double-strand breaks: signalling, repair and the cancer connection.Nat. Genet. 27:247-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Lavin, M. F., G. Birrell, P. Chen, S. Kozlov, S. Scott, and N. Gueven. 2005. ATM signaling and genomic stability in response to DNA damage. Mutat. Res. 569:123-132.[Medline]
32. LeBron, C., L. Chen, D. M. Gilkes, and J. Chen.2006 . Regulation of MDMX nuclear import and degradation by Chk2 and 14-3-3. EMBO J. 25:1196-1206.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Lee,
J. H., and T. T. Paull. 2005. ATM
activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1
complex. Science
308:551-554.
34. Li,
J., and D. F. Stern. 2005. DNA damage
regulates CHK2 association with chromatin. J. Biol.
Chem.
280:37948-37956.
35. Matsuoka,
S., M. Huang, and S. J. Elledge. 1998.
Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase.Science
282:1893-1897.
36. Matsuoka,
S., G. Rotman, A. Ogawa, Y. Shiloh, K. Tamai, and S. J.
Elledge. 2000. Ataxia telangiectasia-mutated
phosphorylates Chk2 in vivo and in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA
97:10389-10394.
37. McGowan, C. H., and P. Russell. 2004. The DNA damage response: sensing and signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16:629-633.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. McKinnon, P. J. 2004. ATM and ataxia telangiectasia.EMBO Rep. 5:772-776.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Melchionna, R., X. B. Chen, A. Blasina, and C. H. McGowan.2000 . Threonine 68 is required for radiation-induced phosphorylation and activation of Cds1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:762-765.[CrossRef][Medline]
40. O'Driscoll, M., A. R. Gennery, J. Seidel, P. Concannon, and P. A. Jeggo. 2004. An overview of three new disorders associated with genetic instability: LIG4 syndrome, RS-SCID and ATR-Seckel syndrome. DNA Repair 3:1227-1235.[Medline]
41. Okamoto,
K., K. Kashima, Y. Pereg, M. Ishida, S. Yamazaki, A. Nota, A. Teunisse,
D. Migliorini, L. Kitabayashi, J. C. Marine, C. Prives, Y.
Shiloh, A. G. Jochemsen, and Y. Taya. 2005.
DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of MdmX at serine 367 activates p53
by targeting MdmX for Mdm2-dependent degradation. Mol. Cell.
Biol.
25:9608-9620.
42. Oliver, A. W., A. Paul, K. J. Boxall, S. E. Barrie, G. W. Aherne, M. D. Garrett, S. Mittnacht, and L. H. Pearl. 2006. Trans-activation of the DNA-damage signalling protein kinase Chk2 by T-loop exchange.EMBO J. 25:3179-3190.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Paull, T. T., and J. H. Lee. 2005. The Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex and its role as a DNA double-strand break sensor for ATM. Cell Cycle 4:737-740.[Medline]
44. Pereg,
Y., D. Shkedy, P. de Graaf, E. Meulmeester, M. Edelson-Averbukh, M.
Salek, S. Biton, A. F. Teunisse, W. D. Lehmann,
A. G. Jochemsen, and Y. Shiloh. 2005.
Phosphorylation of Hdmx mediates its Hdm2- and ATM-dependent
degradation in response to DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
USA
102:5056-5061.
45. Rogoff,
H. A., M. T. Pickering, F. M. Frame,
M. E. Debatis, Y. Sanchez, S. Jones, and T. F.
Kowalik. 2004. Apoptosis associated with deregulated
E2F activity is dependent on E2F1 and Atm/Nbs1/Chk2. Mol. Cell.
Biol.
24:2968-2977.
46. Sarkaria,
J. N., E. C. Busby, R. S. Tibbetts, P.
Roos, Y. Taya, L. M. Karnitz, and R. T.
Abraham. 1999. Inhibition of ATM and ATR kinase
activities by the radiosensitizing agent, caffeine. Cancer
Res.
59:4375-4382.
47. Schwarz,
J. K., C. M. Lovly, and H. Piwnica-Worms.2003
. Regulation of the Chk2 protein kinase by
oligomerization-mediated cis- and trans-phosphorylation. Mol.
Cancer Res.
1:598-609.
48. Shiloh, Y. 2003. ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3:155-168.[CrossRef][Medline]
49. Shroff, R., A. Arbel-Eden, D. Pilch, G. Ira, W. M. Bonner, J. H. Petrini, J. E. Haber, and M. Lichten.2004 . Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 14:1703-1711.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Stevens, C., L. Smith, and N. B. La Thangue. 2003. Chk2 activates E2F-1 in response to DNA damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:401-409.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Takai, H., K. Naka, Y. Okada, M. Watanabe, N. Harada, S. Saito, C. W. Anderson, E. Appella, M. Nakanishi, H. Suzuki, K. Nagashima, H. Sawa, K. Ikeda, and N. Motoyama. 2002. Chk2-deficient mice exhibit radioresistance and defective p53-mediated transcription.EMBO J. 21:5195-5205.[CrossRef][Medline]
52. Taylor, A. M., A. Groom, and P. J. Byrd.2004 . Ataxia-telangiectasia-like disorder (ATLD)its clinical presentation and molecular basis.DNA Repair 3:1219-1225.[Medline]
53. Tominaga,
K., H. Morisaki, Y. Kaneko, A. Fujimoto, T. Tanaka, M.Ohtsubo, M. Hirai, H. Okayama, K. Ikeda, and M. Nakanishi.1999
. Role of human Cds1 (Chk2) kinase in DNA damage
checkpoint and its regulation by p53. J. Biol.
Chem.
274:31463-31467.
54. Uziel, T., Y. Lerenthal, L. Moyal, Y. Andegeko, L. Mittelman, and Y. Shiloh. 2003. Requirement of the MRN complex for ATM activation by DNA damage. EMBO J. 22:5612-5621.[CrossRef][Medline]
55. Wu,
X., S. R. Webster, and J. Chen.2001
. Characterization of tumor-associated Chk2 mutations.J. Biol. Chem.
276:2971-2974.
56. Xu,
X., L. M. Tsvetkov, and D. F. Stern.2002
. Chk2 activation and phosphorylation-dependent
oligomerization. Mol. Cell. Biol.
22:4419-4432.
57. Yang, S., C. Kuo, J. E. Bisi, and M. K. Kim.2002 . PML-dependent apoptosis after DNA damage is regulated by the checkpoint kinase hCds1/Chk2. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:865-870.[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Zhang,
J., H. Willers, Z. Feng, J. C. Ghosh, S. Kim, D. T.
Weaver, J. H. Chung, S. N. Powell, and F. Xia.2004
. Chk2 phosphorylation of BRCA1 regulates DNA
double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol.
24:708-718.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||